Top Banner
Measuring policy influence: like measuring thin air? John Young: [email protected] Arnaldo Pellini: [email protected]
17

Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Nov 01, 2014

Download

Technology

ODI_Webmaster

A presentation from RAPID's John Young, outlining how the programme thinks about measuring policy influence through monitoring and evaluation.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Measuring policy influence: like

measuring thin air?

John Young: [email protected] Pellini: [email protected]

Page 2: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

RAPID

Power, Politics and evidence use

Evidence production and communication

Knowledge intermediaries and interactions

Page 3: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Policy processes are...

Monitoring and Evaluation

Agenda Setting

DecisionMaking

Policy Implementation

Policy Formulation

Civil Society

DonorsCabinet

Parliament

Ministries

Private Sector

Page 4: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

The Cynefn Framework

4

Page 5: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Policy change

• Discursive: Client-focused services

• Attitudinal: Farmers have good ideas

• Procedural: Participatory approaches to service development

• Content: UU20, UU25. New guidelines

• Behavioural: Approach being applied in practice

5

Page 6: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Focus on behaviour change

Inputs Activities Outputs

Other Actors

Project Team

Outcome ImpactOutcomes ImpactOutcomes Impact

BehaviourChange6

Page 7: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach

Academic research communications

Develop a network or partnership

Online communications

Media strategy

More research

Policy advocacy coalition

Page 8: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Why do M&E?

• To learn about what works• To manage better• To account:

– to donors– to recipients

8

Page 9: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Methods

• Classical case studies (IDRC, IFPRI)

• Episode studies (ODI/RAPID)

• Stories of Change (Denning)

• Micro-Narratives (Snowden)

• Impact matrices (Davies)

• Peer evaluations (CHSRF)

• Systematic reviews?

• RCTs?

9

Page 10: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Outcome Mapping

OUTCOME MAPPING:Building Learning and Reflection into Development ProgramsSarah Earl, Fred Carden, and Terry Smutylo

http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-9330-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html

10

Page 11: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Social Network Analysis

11

Page 12: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

RAPID Outcome Assessment

12

Page 13: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

1. Strategy and direction –are you doing the right thing?

2. Management –are you doing what you planned to do?

3. Outputs – are the outputs appropriate for the audience?

4. Uptake – are people aware of your work?

5. Outcomes and impacts –are you having any impact?

A systematic approach

1. Strategy and direction

2. Management

3. Outputs

4. Uptake

5. Outcomes and impacts

13

Page 14: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

M&E in ODI

Page 15: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

Impact Logs & SoC

15

Page 16: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

3ie PIM Project Evaluation Framework

16

Page 17: Monitoring & Evaluation - the RAPID approach

TTI Evaluation Framework