MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL REGULATION NO. 5 YEAR 2008 ABOUT SMOKE- FREE AREA (SFA) AND SMOKE- RESTRICTED AREA (SRA) IN SURABAYA.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL REGULATION NO. 5 YEAR 2008 ABOUT SMOKE- FREE AREA (SFA) AND

SMOKE- RESTRICTED AREA (SRA) IN SURABAYA

OlehKurnia Dwi Artanti

Santi MartiniKusuma Scorpia Lestari

Presented atThe 2nd ITCRN

21April 2015

Faculty of Public Health , Airlangga UniversitySurabaya, East Java

Background

Background (Cont..)Smoke Free- Area :an area where individuals who is prohibited to conduct activities related smoking like as: producing or making cigarettes; sell cigarettes; organized cigarette advertising; promoting cigarettes and cigarette use.

Smoke Restricted Area :an area where individuals are permited to smoke in limited areas. The management must provide a designated smoking room and put “ No smoking” signage in other areas.

Research Objectives

General :To monitor and evaluate of implementation of Local Regulation No. 5/ 2008 in Surabaya about SFA and SRA public facilities Specific :•To get description of the local regulation implementation at work and public places. •To identify obstacles and supporting factors in regarding to implement the local regulation •To get input for implementation the local regulation optimally.

Methodology• Research design : cross – sectional study• The Study location consist of restaurant,

hotel, mall, park, market, transportation.• Sample size are 200 places chosen randomly

Sampling for this study used cluster random sampling based on area in Surabaya (East, West, Center, North, and South).

Methodology (cont.....)

Results

SignateHotel Resto Mall Park Transport Market Frequency

n %Get “No smoking” Signage Accordance to Regulation

0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1

Get “ No smoking” Signage Not Accordance Regulation

34 31 13 1 4 1 84 42

Not Get Signage 32 22 4 14 1 41 114 57Sum 66 53 19 15 5 42 200 100

Overview Implementation Regulation about Signage

The Signage

The Standard Signage

No The Standard Signage

Result (Cont .....)Overview Implementation Regulation about Founded smoking room

IndicatorsHotel Resto Mall Park Transport Market Frequency

N %Outside Building Accordace Regulation

0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1

Outside Building Not Accordace Regulation

6 5 2 0 4 017 8.5

Inside Building 7 14 10 0 0 0 31 15.5Outside Building Not Accordace Regulation and Inside Building

2 2 1 0 0 05 2.5

Do Not have smoking room

51 32 5 15 0 42145 72.5

Sum 66 53 19 15 5 42 200 100

Result (Cont.....)

Indicators Hotel Resto Mall Park Transport Market FrequencyN %

Founded Smoker weekday 25 18 13 14 5 40 115 57,5

Founded Smoker weekend 27 16 13 11 5 40 112 56

Founded the smell cigarette smoke weekday

30 13 10 8 4 36 101 50,5

Founded the smell cigarette smoke weekend

35 9 10 8 5 33 100 50

Founded Astray and Lighter weekday

60 26 13 4 3 19 125 62,5

Founded Astray and Lighter weekend 60 27 13 4 3 17 124 62

Overview Implementation Regulation about Violation

Result (Cont...)Overview Implementation Regulation about Violation

Indicators Hotel Resto Mall Park Transport Market FrequencyN %

Founded Cigarette Butts weekday

53 21 9 15 5 42 145 72,5

Founded Cigarette Butts weekend

52 24 10 15 5 41 147 73,5

Presence cooperation with tobacco industry weekday

15 19 6 1 2 22 65 32,5

Presence cooperation with tobacco industry weekend

15 20 6 1 2 22 66 33

Founded cigarette sales weekday

31 15 13 4 5 36 104 52

Founded cigarette sales weekend

31 15 13 3 5 36 102 51

Supports and Obtacles• 64.5% managers of public facilities did not know about the

regulation SFA in Surabaya which ban smoking in the area public facility.

• Facilities have done implement these regulations were still 52.5%.

• Although public facilities have been implementing regulations, but still a little (30%) already provides for sanctions include verbal warning.

• Only 12% of public facilities are already recorded every sanctions already given.

• Managers do not aware that if they do not implement the regulation of SFA and SRA cause managers public facilities get sanction from the local government.

Suggestion to Increase Implementation

No Suggestion Number of Facilities

1. Given Information session conducted by public facilities management

50

2. Given Information session conducted by outsider 43

3. Give Punishment or Reward 30

4. There is a smoking area / special place 19

5. Signing No smoking 12

6. Establishment of a monitoring team at public facilities 7

7. Rejected 23

Conclusion• An overview of the implementation of the Regional Regulation of

Surabaya No. 5 of 2008 is still very weak because there are many violation in almost all indicators observed.

• The most violation is installation signage “no smoking” and providing smoking room that is not in accordance with the Regional Regulation No. 5 tahun 2008 of Surabaya City.

• Constraints met by managers of public facilities in the implementing regulations SFA and SRA is the manager did not know about the regulation SFA and SRA in Surabaya which bans smoking in the building / the public facility

• The Most Suggestion for Optimization of implementation regulations are give Information session from the manager of a public facility or outside.

Recommendations

• To improve the effectiveness of the implementation of Regulation No. 5 of 2008 about SFA and SRA, Given Information session of these regulations should be done regularly and continuously.

• Installation of signange “no-smoking “ in accordance Perwali no. 25 of 2009 and its implementation should be monitored by the Monitoring Team SFA and SRA at City level.

• For the implementation of this Regulation SFA and SRA optimally, then sanctions for violations should be upheld both for smokers who violate the regulations and management public facilities.

Thank You