Ever since Julia Gillard called the election back in January most discussions about the slow economy included something along the lines of “people are waiting to see what will happen after the election”. Implicit in that was a belief that once the leadership was decided, it would all go back to normal and the economy would pick up. What exactly can we expect from a coalition-led economy? Let’s look at some historical data recently published by Goldman Sachs to get a better idea. In three changes of power to the coalition from Labor since 1949, the Australian sharemarket has been up an average of 26.8 per cent 18 months after an election. For the nine runs of Labor Party rule since 1949, the average performance of the Australian sharemarket 18 months after- wards is minus 1.74 per cent. For the 16 runs of coalition govern- ment, the average performance of the market is 15.43 per cent. While this suggests that coali- tion governments have a signifi- cantly better economic record than Labor, it is possible the over- all global economic climate at the time has as much or more to do with these statistics as any inter- nal influence by the coalition. If that is the case, with global markets appearing to be improv- ing for the first sustained period since the 2008 global financial crisis, the coalition may well gain from another dose of good timing. Benefiting from this global prosperity by attracting foreign investors to Australia and by ax- ing the carbon and mining taxes is a focus of Tony Abbott’s efforts to stimulate economic growth. Another factor that undoubt edly has an effect on the nation’s financial prosperity is having confidence in a government, whether Labor or coalition. Following two terms in which the incumbent Labor prime min- ister was ousted before even con- testing a second election, it is fair to consider that investor and pub- lic confidence in Labor govern- ment stability as low. With Mr Abbott able to survive as opposition leader despite con- sistently poor leadership polling over recent years it is highly un- likely the coalition will follow La- bor’s blueprint for disaster. It is that stability, along with a steadily improving global econo- my, that should give investors cause for optimism about Austra- lia’s economic future. Troy MacMillan is a financial planner with The Wealth Designers It’s about stability — we all like it ■ Troy MacMillan Julia Gillard Tony Abbott The US Treasury has warned of a severe recession and the Interna- tional Monetary Fund of a global slowdown if US political grand- standing leads to a historic US debt default. President Barack Obama’s Democrats or the Republicans, led by John Boehner, must agree to raise the statutory limit on US borrowing before October 17. Complacent financial markets accustomed to US officials bend- ing over backwards to soothe them have begun to stir as the deadlock drags on, but few expect the US to actually default on its interest payments. Though markets might be un- derestimating the pig-headed- ness of US lawmakers and the fallout of a “selective” default, they are correct to assume over the longer term there is limited risk of non-payment for US bond holders. The credit rating will take a hit in the short term, but there sim- ply is no way that after spending $US3.7 trillion via the US Federal Reserve to support global mar- kets, US officials will let the tech- nical issue of a nominal debt lim- it blot its credit rating. It is unthinkable and unneces- sary because as the issuer of its own currency the US Govern- ment will find a way to make up for any delayed interest pay- ments and any short-term notes that matured during a strategic default. Highly geared investors could lose a lot of money as volatility soars, but the GFC in 2008 showed there is nothing quite like a fi- nancial markets crisis to crystal- lise a bipartisan agreement. The most likely scenario is that a deal will be reached at the 11th hour when one party blinks, but there are other unorthodox ways to conjure up funding. The option to mint a $US1 tril- lion platinum coin was touted back in 2011 as a solution to the debt ceiling wrangling. It has been raised again as a longer-lasting solution to circum- vent the increasingly regular political deadlock. Regulations allow the US Trea- sury to mint coins, including an absurdly expensive $US1 trillion platinum coin, of whatever phys- ical size it chooses. The coin can then be pledged as collateral in a repo (repurchase agreement) with the Fed to get cash, less a nominal haircut. Putting aside the cream-skim- ming, round-trip through the ma- jor banks, a platinum coin repo is essentially no different to the current sale of US Treasury bonds to primary bond dealers and the subsequent purchase by the Fed via its $US85 billion a month quantitative easing pro- gram. Every week the US Treasury says the “paper” bonds it sells are worth anything from $US5 bil- lion to $US50 billion, so the once off issue of a coin it claims is worth $US1 trillion is little differ- ent, except for the perculiar na- ture and size. US bond holders will most cer- tainly be made “whole” at some point, even if there is a default. The risk for markets is an in- terbank cash lock-up where the continual “flow” of US dollars is essential to global markets. The Fed would, as usual, pro- vide emergency liquidity to ma- jor US banks. But any cash squeeze in the run-up to October 17 could be most acutely felt by increased margin calls in the $US1 quad- rillion derivatives market. It would also knock emerging mar- kets like India, Brazil and Indo- nesia, where the brunt of taper- ing fears were felt in May. In the gun: Federal workers rally in Washington to demand a vote to end the government shutdown. Picture: Reuters Who takes the hit if Uncle Sam defaults? ■ Gareth Costa Analysis 5 YOUR MONEY thewest.com.au Monday, October 7, 2013 Did you know that self managed superannuation fund members can provide interest-free loans to their SMSF without any penalty from the tax man? While being able to make loans to the fund overcomes the issue of the cap on member contributions the ability to make interest-free loans to funds would make SMSF borrowing even more attractive to trustees. The ATO has admitted that the law allows SMSF members to pro- vide interest-free loans to their funds because the fund suffers no disadvantage under the limited recourse borrowing arrange- ments. The ATO agreed that the law does not prevent related par- ties providing interest-free loans to their funds. However, the ATO is certainly not publicising this. While it’s probably a loophole that will end up being closed, at the moment it’s quite legal for people to do this. It means funds can buy bigger assets, such as property, at zero interest and pay tax on investment income at a maximum of 15 per cent, rather than the members’ marginal tax rate. SMSF trustees could take ad- vantage of the loophole by doing the following: ᔢ Ensuring interest rates are not more favourable to the lender than the fund. If the interest rate is at a commercial rate, or even lower, the arrangement satisfies the law. ᔢ Structure the loan correctly. Loan documents need to be in the name of the SMSF trustee. Title documents need to be in the name of a separate holding trustee. ᔢ Be careful of having a related party act as a guarantor for the loan. If the fund defaults on the loan and the lender approaches the guarantor before making a claim on the fund’s asset the guarantor’s loan repayment would be viewed as a contribu- tion and could incur more tax. Monica Rule is the author of The Self Managed Super Handbook — Superannuation Law for Self Managed Superannuation Funds in Plain English www.monicarule.com.au Here’s a loophole worth acting on super ■ Monica Rule The effects of the US Government shutdown were cascading into the business sector and into vital collection of economic data, the country’s Com- merce Secretary Penny Pritzker warned yesterday. The first shutdown in 17 years had di- rectly affected hundreds of thousands of government employees but Ms Pritzker said companies were also starting to hurt. “The shutdown is not good for busi- ness. It’s not good for the economy,” Ms Pritzker said at the Asia-Pacific Eco- nomic Cooperation forum in Bali, which President Barack Obama has been forced to skip. Ms Pritzker said one big problem was businesses could no longer access vital data about the economy that is usually posted on the Commerce Department’s website. Ms Pritzker recounted the story of her son, an analyst in New York, who could not access retail sales data that is normally accessible online. “He said: ‘I need retail sales numbers and your website is not functioning right now’,” Ms Pritzker said. Nevertheless, Ms Pritzker said she was an optimist and believed a solution would be achieved soon. AFP US business feels squeeze THE COALITION EFFECT
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Ever since Julia Gillard calledthe election back in Januarymost discussions about the sloweconomy included somethingalong the lines of “people arewaiting to see what will happenafter the election”.
Implicit in that was a beliefthat once the leadership was decided, it would all go back tonormal and the economy wouldpick up.
What exactly can we expect
from a coalition-led economy?Let’s look at some historical datarecently published by GoldmanSachs to get a better idea.
In three changes of power to thecoalition from Labor since 1949,the Australian sharemarket hasbeen up an average of 26.8 percent 18 months after an election.
For the nine runs of Labor Party rule since 1949, the averageperformance of the Australiansharemarket 18 months after-wards is minus 1.74 per cent. Forthe 16 runs of coalition govern-ment, the average performance ofthe market is 15.43 per cent.
While this suggests that coali-tion governments have a signifi-
cantly better economic recordthan Labor, it is possible the over-all global economic climate at thetime has as much or more to dowith these statistics as any inter-
nal influence by the coalition.If that is the case, with global
markets appearing to be improv-ing for the first sustained periodsince the 2008 global financial crisis, the coalition may well gainfrom another dose of good timing.
Benefiting from this globalprosperity by attracting foreigninvestors to Australia and by ax-ing the carbon and mining taxesis a focus of Tony Abbott’s effortsto stimulate economic growth.
Another factor that undoubtedly has an effect on the nation’s financial prosperity is havingconfidence in a government,whether Labor or coalition.
Following two terms in which
the incumbent Labor prime min-ister was ousted before even con-testing a second election, it is fairto consider that investor and pub-lic confidence in Labor govern-ment stability as low.
With Mr Abbott able to surviveas opposition leader despite con-sistently poor leadership pollingover recent years it is highly un-likely the coalition will follow La-bor’s blueprint for disaster.
It is that stability, along with asteadily improving global econo-my, that should give investorscause for optimism about Austra-lia’s economic future.Troy MacMillan is a financial plannerwith The Wealth Designers
It’s about stability — we all like it■ Troy MacMillan
Julia Gillard Tony Abbott
The US Treasury has warned of asevere recession and the Interna-tional Monetary Fund of a globalslowdown if US political grand-standing leads to a historic USdebt default.
President Barack Obama’sDemocrats or the Republicans,led by John Boehner, must agreeto raise the statutory limit on USborrowing before October 17.
Complacent financial marketsaccustomed to US officials bend-ing over backwards to soothethem have begun to stir as thedeadlock drags on, but few expectthe US to actually default on itsinterest payments.
Though markets might be un-derestimating the pig-headed-ness of US lawmakers and thefallout of a “selective” default,they are correct to assume overthe longer term there is limitedrisk of non-payment for US bondholders.
The credit rating will take a hitin the short term, but there sim-ply is no way that after spending$US3.7 trillion via the US FederalReserve to support global mar-kets, US officials will let the tech-nical issue of a nominal debt lim-it blot its credit rating.
It is unthinkable and unneces-
sary because as the issuer of itsown currency the US Govern-ment will find a way to make upfor any delayed interest pay-ments and any short-term notesthat matured during a strategicdefault.
Highly geared investors couldlose a lot of money as volatilitysoars, but the GFC in 2008 showedthere is nothing quite like a fi-nancial markets crisis to crystal-lise a bipartisan agreement.
The most likely scenario is thata deal will be reached at the 11thhour when one party blinks, butthere are other unorthodox
ways to conjure up funding.The option to mint a $US1 tril-
lion platinum coin was toutedback in 2011 as a solution to thedebt ceiling wrangling.
It has been raised again as alonger-lasting solution to circum-vent the increasingly regular political deadlock.
Regulations allow the US Trea-sury to mint coins, including anabsurdly expensive $US1 trillionplatinum coin, of whatever phys-ical size it chooses.
The coin can then be pledged ascollateral in a repo (repurchaseagreement) with the Fed to get
cash, less a nominal haircut.Putting aside the cream-skim-
ming, round-trip through the ma-jor banks, a platinum coin repo isessentially no different to thecurrent sale of US Treasurybonds to primary bond dealersand the subsequent purchase bythe Fed via its $US85 billion amonth quantitative easing pro-gram.
Every week the US Treasurysays the “paper” bonds it sells areworth anything from $US5 bil-lion to $US50 billion, so the onceoff issue of a coin it claims isworth $US1 trillion is little differ-ent, except for the perculiar na-ture and size.
US bond holders will most cer-tainly be made “whole” at somepoint, even if there is a default.
The risk for markets is an in-terbank cash lock-up where thecontinual “flow” of US dollars isessential to global markets.
The Fed would, as usual, pro-vide emergency liquidity to ma-jor US banks.
But any cash squeeze in therun-up to October 17 could bemost acutely felt by increasedmargin calls in the $US1 quad-rillion derivatives market. Itwould also knock emerging mar-kets like India, Brazil and Indo-nesia, where the brunt of taper-ing fears were felt in May.
In the gun: Federal workers rally in Washington to demand a vote to end the government shutdown. Picture: Reuters
Who takes the hit if Uncle Sam defaults?■ Gareth Costa
Analysis
5YOUR MONEYthewest.com.auMonday, October 7, 2013
Did you know that self managedsuperannuation fund memberscan provide interest-free loans totheir SMSF without any penaltyfrom the tax man?
While being able to make loansto the fund overcomes the issue ofthe cap on member contributionsthe ability to make interest-freeloans to funds would make SMSFborrowing even more attractiveto trustees.
The ATO has admitted that thelaw allows SMSF members to pro-vide interest-free loans to theirfunds because the fund suffers nodisadvantage under the limitedrecourse borrowing arrange-ments. The ATO agreed that thelaw does not prevent related par-ties providing interest-free loansto their funds. However, the ATOis certainly not publicising this.
While it’s probably a loopholethat will end up being closed, atthe moment it’s quite legal forpeople to do this. It means fundscan buy bigger assets, such asproperty, at zero interest and paytax on investment income at amaximum of 15 per cent, ratherthan the members’ marginal taxrate.
SMSF trustees could take ad-vantage of the loophole by doingthe following: � Ensuring interest rates are notmore favourable to the lenderthan the fund. If the interest rateis at a commercial rate, or evenlower, the arrangement satisfiesthe law. � Structure the loan correctly.Loan documents need to be in thename of the SMSF trustee. Titledocuments need to be in the nameof a separate holding trustee. � Be careful of having a relatedparty act as a guarantor for theloan. If the fund defaults on theloan and the lender approachesthe guarantor before making aclaim on the fund’s asset theguarantor’s loan repaymentwould be viewed as a contribu-tion and could incur more tax. Monica Rule is the author of The SelfManaged Super Handbook —Superannuation Law for Self ManagedSuperannuation Funds in Plain Englishwww.monicarule.com.au
Here’s aloopholeworthacting on
super■ Monica Rule
The effects of the US Governmentshutdown were cascading into thebusiness sector and into vital collectionof economic data, the country’s Com-merce Secretary Penny Pritzkerwarned yesterday.
The first shutdown in 17 years had di-rectly affected hundreds of thousandsof government employees but MsPritzker said companies were alsostarting to hurt.
“The shutdown is not good for busi-ness. It’s not good for the economy,”Ms Pritzker said at the Asia-Pacific Eco-nomic Cooperation forum in Bali,which President Barack Obama has
been forced to skip. Ms Pritzker saidone big problem was businesses couldno longer access vital data about theeconomy that is usually posted on theCommerce Department’s website.
Ms Pritzker recounted the story ofher son, an analyst in New York, whocould not access retail sales data that isnormally accessible online.
“He said: ‘I need retail sales numbersand your website is not functioningright now’,” Ms Pritzker said.
Nevertheless, Ms Pritzker said shewas an optimist and believed a solutionwould be achieved soon.AFP
US business feels squeeze
THE COALITION EFFECT
Related Documents
