Top Banner
Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN, DISTRICT, LOCAL AND VILLAGE CENTRES STUDY Appendices November 2007
172

Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Sep 21, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN, DISTRICT, LOCAL AND VILLAGE CENTRES STUDY

Appendices November 2007

Page 2: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

P1756

ROGER TYM & PARTNERS

Fairfax House 15 Fulwood Place London WC1V 6HU t (020) 7831 2711 f (020) 7831 7653 e [email protected] w www.tymconsult.com

This document is formatted for double-sided printing.

Page 3: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

CONTENTS

APPENDIX 1 – HOUSEHOLD SURVEY

APPENDIX 2 – IN CENTRE – DORKING, LEATHERHEAD, ASHTEAD, FETCHAM & BOOKHAM

APPENDIX 3 - BUSINESS SURVEY

APPENDIX 4 - RETAILER REQUIREMENTS - DORKING AND LEATHERHEAD

APPENDIX 5 - NEED AND CAPACITY

APPENDIX 6 - GLOSSARY

Page 4: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 5: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

APPENDIX 1 Household Survey

Page 6: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 7: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q01 In which shop has your household spent most money on food and groceries over the past 6 months ? Alldays, The Street, Ashtead 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Asda, Burgh Heatth 2.2% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.0% 5 2.0% 2 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 0.0% 0Asda, Sutton / Cheam 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Budgens, Fetcham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Co-Op, Cranleigh 0.8% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Lidl, Horley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lidl, Leatherhead 0.4% 4 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lidl, Redhill 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Cranleigh 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Marks & Spencer, Dorking 0.2% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Redhill 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Reigate 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer,

Brooklands, Weybridge 0.3% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Morrisons, Reigate 3.9% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.0% 25 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 1.0% 2One Stop, Kingston Rd,

Leatherhead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Rusts, Bookham 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Burpham /

Guildford 1.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.0% 7 4.0% 5 0.0% 0

Sainsburys, Cobham 5.7% 46 32.0% 20 11.0% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.0% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Cranleigh 4.9% 39 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 31.0% 32 2.0% 2 3.0% 5Sainsburys, Dorking 4.9% 39 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 28.0% 35 1.0% 2Sainsburys, Epsom 3.0% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 22.0% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Godalming 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Horsham 5.1% 41 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 25.0% 39Sainsburys, Leatherhead 6.0% 48 0.0% 0 22.0% 20 27.0% 16 8.0% 8 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Redhill 1.6% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.0% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, North Cheam /

Sutton 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Somerfield, Bookham 1.4% 11 0.0% 0 11.0% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tesco, Craddocks Parade,

Ashtead 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Tesco, Broadbridge Heath / Horsham

11.1% 89 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 6.0% 6 4.0% 5 49.0% 77

Tesco, Guildford 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tesco, Hookwood 4.8% 38 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 28.0% 30 0.0% 0 5.0% 6 1.0% 2Tesco, Leatherhead 14.4% 115 14.0% 9 41.0% 37 46.0% 27 31.0% 30 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 8.0% 10 0.0% 0Tesco, North Cheam / Sutton 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tesco, Brooklands,

Weybridge 0.8% 7 7.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Waitrose, Banstead 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Cobham 4.1% 33 36.0% 23 1.0% 1 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 7.0% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Dorking 5.3% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 27.0% 33 3.0% 5Waitrose, Epsom 2.4% 19 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 17.0% 16 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Esher 0.3% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Waitrose, Godalming 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Horley 0.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Horsham 0.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 6Other 1.8% 15 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 3.0% 4 2.0% 3Internet / mail order /

delivered 4.3% 34 4.0% 3 3.0% 3 3.0% 2 7.0% 7 8.0% 9 4.0% 4 5.0% 6 1.0% 2

Asda, Peglar Way, Crawley 0.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 6Marks & Spencer, Ashley

Centre, Epsom 0.4% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Budgens, East Horsley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 3.0% 24 1.0% 1 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 4.0% 4 4.0% 4 2.0% 2 4.0% 6Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 8: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 65 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q02 When your household undertakes its main food and grocery shopping at (STORE MENTIONED AT Q01) does it visit other shops, leisure facilities or use other services on the same shopping trips:

Those who do not shop on the internet at Q01 Always 7.2% 55 11.5% 7 13.4% 12 5.2% 3 8.6% 8 6.5% 6 6.3% 6 4.2% 5 5.1% 8Normally 15.9% 122 20.8% 13 12.4% 11 14.4% 8 8.6% 8 16.3% 16 17.7% 18 13.7% 16 21.2% 33Sometimes 17.5% 134 11.5% 7 18.6% 16 17.5% 10 20.4% 18 20.7% 20 11.5% 11 22.1% 26 16.2% 25Rarely 9.5% 73 4.2% 3 13.4% 12 7.2% 4 10.8% 10 7.6% 7 11.5% 11 11.6% 14 8.1% 13Never 48.8% 373 51.0% 31 41.2% 36 55.7% 32 48.4% 44 48.9% 48 51.0% 51 48.4% 57 48.5% 75(Don't know / varies) 1.1% 8 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.2% 3 0.0% 0 2.1% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 2

Weighted base: 766 61 87 57 90 98 100 117 155Sample: 765 96 97 97 93 92 96 95 99 Q03 In addition to a main food shop, does your household normally do any other ‘top-up’ shopping for food and grocery items at an

individual shop or supermarket ? Yes 74.2% 593 69.0% 44 81.0% 73 63.0% 37 69.0% 67 74.0% 79 77.0% 80 78.0% 96 75.0% 117No 25.6% 205 31.0% 20 19.0% 17 37.0% 22 31.0% 30 26.0% 28 21.0% 22 22.0% 27 25.0% 39(Don't know) 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 9: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 66 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q04 Where does your household undertake most ‘top-up’ food and grocery purchases ? Those who do top up shopping at Q03 Alldays, The Street, Ashtead 0.5% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.6% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 2Asda, Burgh Heatth 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Asda, Sutton / Cheam 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Budgens, Fetcham 3.8% 22 1.4% 1 28.4% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Co-Op, Cranleigh 2.3% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.6% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 13.0% 10 0.0% 0 1.3% 2Lidl, Horley 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lidl, Leatherhead 0.6% 4 0.0% 0 1.2% 1 4.8% 2 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lidl, Redhill 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Cranleigh 0.7% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Dorking 1.6% 9 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 1.6% 1 1.4% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 6.4% 6 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Redhill 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Reigate 1.4% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer,

Brooklands, Weybridge 0.1% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Morrisons, Reigate 2.3% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.6% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0One Stop, Kingston Rd,

Leatherhead 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Rusts, Bookham 0.5% 3 0.0% 0 3.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Burpham /

Guildford 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Sainsburys, Cobham 1.2% 7 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 1.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 1 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Cranleigh 2.8% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.9% 14 0.0% 0 2.7% 3Sainsburys, Dorking 7.8% 46 0.0% 0 1.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 38.5% 37 5.3% 6Sainsburys, Epsom 1.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 5.8% 4 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Horsham 0.8% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 5Sainsburys, Leatherhead 5.0% 29 0.0% 0 4.9% 4 47.6% 18 8.7% 6 0.0% 0 1.3% 1 1.3% 1 0.0% 0Sainsburys, Redhill 0.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sainsburys, North Cheam /

Sutton 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Somerfield, Bookham 3.8% 23 0.0% 0 29.6% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tesco, Craddocks Parade,

Ashtead 3.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 31.9% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Tesco, Broadbridge Heath / Horsham

2.8% 17 0.0% 0 1.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.3% 16

Tesco, Guildford 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tesco, Hookwood 1.3% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.6% 1 0.0% 0 5.4% 4 0.0% 0 1.3% 1 1.3% 2Tesco, Leatherhead 3.4% 20 13.0% 6 6.2% 4 17.5% 7 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 2 0.0% 0Tesco, North Cheam / Sutton 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tesco, Brooklands,

Weybridge 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Waitrose, Banstead 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Cobham 5.0% 30 52.2% 23 2.5% 2 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 3.9% 3 1.3% 1 0.0% 0Waitrose, Dorking 4.6% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 20.5% 20 5.3% 6Waitrose, Epsom 2.6% 15 0.0% 0 1.2% 1 1.6% 1 18.8% 13 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Esher 0.3% 2 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 1 0.0% 0Waitrose, Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose, Horley 0.8% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 2Waitrose, Horsham 1.2% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.3% 6Other 13.8% 82 5.8% 3 8.6% 6 14.3% 5 11.6% 8 17.6% 14 16.9% 14 14.1% 14 16.0% 19Internet / mail order /

delivered 1.4% 8 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.0% 5

Asda, Peglar Way, Crawley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks & Spencer, Ashley

Centre, Epsom 0.6% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.6% 1 4.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Budgens, East Horsley 1.4% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.4% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 19.0% 113 10.1% 4 9.9% 7 0.0% 0 10.1% 7 21.6% 17 26.0% 21 11.5% 11 38.7% 45

Weighted base: 593 44 73 37 67 79 80 96 117Sample: 586 69 81 63 69 74 77 78 75

Page 10: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 67 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q05 In which village, town, retail park or other centre have the members of your household spent most money on clothes and shoes in the past six months ?

Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 1.0% 8 3.0% 2 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Cobham 0.8% 6 5.0% 3 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 10.7% 86 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 23.0% 25 3.0% 3 20.0% 25 20.0% 31Croydon 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Dorking 5.1% 41 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 21.0% 26 3.0% 5Epsom / Ewell 10.5% 84 2.0% 1 17.0% 15 24.0% 14 52.0% 50 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 21.3% 171 18.0% 11 27.0% 24 9.0% 5 4.0% 4 13.0% 14 58.0% 60 29.0% 36 10.0% 16Horsham 9.9% 79 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 3.0% 4 45.0% 70Kingston 10.1% 80 34.0% 22 9.0% 8 22.0% 13 17.0% 16 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 7.0% 9 4.0% 6Leatherhead 2.1% 17 1.0% 1 7.0% 6 13.0% 8 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 1.8% 14 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 12.0% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 1.2% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.0% 9 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 1.9% 16 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 5.0% 3 4.0% 4 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Other 2.1% 17 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 3.0% 4 3.0% 5Internet / mail order /

catalogue 6.5% 52 8.0% 5 12.0% 11 6.0% 4 4.0% 4 7.0% 7 7.0% 7 4.0% 5 6.0% 9

Central London 2.4% 19 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 5.0% 5 5.0% 5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 3Woking 0.6% 5 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.5% 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 1.3% 10 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 1.0% 2

(Nowhere else) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not buy these goods) 8.8% 71 20.0% 13 7.0% 6 10.0% 6 3.0% 3 9.0% 10 16.0% 17 7.0% 9 5.0% 8

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 11: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 68 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

2nd Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 1.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 2Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.4% 3 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.6% 5 5.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 7.1% 57 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.0% 7 6.0% 6 10.0% 12 18.0% 28Croydon 0.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 2.4% 19 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 7.0% 9 0.0% 0Epsom / Ewell 4.6% 37 5.0% 3 8.0% 7 11.0% 7 14.0% 14 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 8.7% 70 18.0% 11 13.0% 12 9.0% 5 10.0% 10 5.0% 5 7.0% 7 4.0% 5 9.0% 14Horsham 4.8% 39 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 9.0% 9 9.0% 11 11.0% 17Kingston 5.5% 44 7.0% 4 9.0% 8 11.0% 7 14.0% 14 3.0% 3 3.0% 3 4.0% 5 0.0% 0Leatherhead 1.9% 15 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 2.0% 1 7.0% 7 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Reigate 0.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 1.7% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.0% 9 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 2.2% 17 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 8.0% 5 9.0% 9 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.2% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 1.9% 16 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 3.0% 4 4.0% 6Internet / mail order /

catalogue 1.2% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Central London 1.3% 11 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 2Woking 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.3% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 2.1% 17 4.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 6.0% 6 1.0% 1 1.0% 2

(Nowhere else) 40.7% 325 34.0% 22 43.0% 39 44.0% 26 28.0% 27 40.0% 43 37.0% 39 44.0% 54 49.0% 77(Do not buy these goods) 8.8% 71 20.0% 13 7.0% 6 10.0% 6 3.0% 3 9.0% 10 16.0% 17 7.0% 9 5.0% 8

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 12: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 69 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q06 In which village, town, retail park or other centre have the members of your household spent most money on furniture / carpets / soft household furnishings in the past six months ?

Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.7% 5 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 4.0% 2 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 1.0% 8 8.0% 5 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 5.8% 46 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.0% 15 3.0% 3 8.0% 10 11.0% 17Croydon 4.1% 33 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 5.0% 3 6.0% 6 7.0% 7 2.0% 2 4.0% 5 5.0% 8Dorking 2.7% 21 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 11.0% 14 1.0% 2Epsom / Ewell 2.0% 16 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 3.0% 2 11.0% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 7.3% 58 8.0% 5 13.0% 12 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 18.0% 19 8.0% 10 5.0% 8Horsham 6.4% 51 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 28.0% 44Kingston 3.9% 31 5.0% 3 3.0% 3 8.0% 5 11.0% 11 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 5Leatherhead 1.3% 10 2.0% 1 3.0% 3 6.0% 4 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 0.8% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Redhill 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.8% 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 2.6% 21 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 8.0% 13Internet / mail order /

catalogue 3.8% 30 1.0% 1 6.0% 5 3.0% 2 4.0% 4 3.0% 3 4.0% 4 4.0% 5 4.0% 6

Central London 1.6% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 6Woking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 1.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 2.3% 18 3.0% 2 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 6.0% 6 5.0% 5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

(Nowhere else) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not buy these goods) 51.1% 409 70.0% 44 58.0% 52 60.0% 35 57.0% 55 41.0% 44 58.0% 60 57.0% 70 30.0% 47

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 13: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 70 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

2nd Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.2% 1 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 1.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 4.0% 6Croydon 1.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 3Dorking 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Epsom / Ewell 0.7% 6 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 2.5% 20 0.0% 0 7.0% 6 2.0% 1 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 3.0% 4 2.0% 3Horsham 1.7% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 2.0% 2 4.0% 6Kingston 1.6% 13 2.0% 1 4.0% 4 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Leatherhead 0.4% 3 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 0.5% 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Internet / mail order /

catalogue 0.7% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 3

Central London 0.4% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Woking 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

(Nowhere else) 35.2% 281 23.0% 15 26.0% 23 25.0% 15 29.0% 28 41.0% 44 29.0% 30 34.0% 42 54.0% 84(Do not buy these goods) 51.1% 409 70.0% 44 58.0% 52 60.0% 35 57.0% 55 41.0% 44 58.0% 60 57.0% 70 30.0% 47

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 14: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 71 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q07 In which village, town, retail park or other centre have the members of your household spent most money on DIY and decorating goods in the past six months ?

Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 23.3% 186 55.0% 35 64.0% 57 58.0% 34 42.0% 41 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 11.0% 14 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 3.6% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 3.0% 3 17.0% 21 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 4.8% 38 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.0% 13 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 13.0% 20Croydon 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 3.8% 30 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 6 1.0% 1 16.0% 20 2.0% 3Epsom / Ewell 2.2% 17 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 4.0% 2 14.0% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 6.2% 49 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 40.0% 42 2.0% 2 1.0% 2Horsham 14.9% 119 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.0% 12 3.0% 4 66.0% 103Kingston 0.2% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 3.1% 25 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 10.0% 6 9.0% 9 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 5.0% 6 0.0% 0Reigate 5.6% 44 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 39.0% 42 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 2Redhill 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 1.2% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Internet / mail order /

catalogue 1.0% 8 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 3

Central London 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 0.7% 5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 2

(Nowhere else) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not buy these goods) 27.4% 219 39.0% 25 24.0% 22 24.0% 14 27.0% 26 25.0% 27 33.0% 34 40.0% 49 14.0% 22

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 15: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 72 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

2nd Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 3.2% 26 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 4.0% 2 6.0% 6 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 7.0% 9 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 2.8% 22 0.0% 0 10.0% 9 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 8.0% 10 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.5% 4 5.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 3.9% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.0% 9 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 13.0% 20Croydon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 2.0% 16 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 1.0% 1 3.0% 4 3.0% 5Epsom / Ewell 3.9% 32 1.0% 1 6.0% 5 7.0% 4 22.0% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.3% 3 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 2.9% 23 0.0% 0 10.0% 9 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 5.0% 6 1.0% 2Horsham 1.4% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 3.0% 4 3.0% 5Kingston 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 2.4% 19 0.0% 0 7.0% 6 1.0% 1 4.0% 4 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 2Reigate 1.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 2Redhill 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Other 0.4% 3 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Internet / mail order /

catalogue 0.3% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Central London 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woking 0.2% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Godalming 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 1.6% 13 3.0% 2 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 2

(Nowhere else) 43.3% 346 45.0% 29 30.0% 27 59.0% 35 31.0% 30 47.0% 50 44.0% 46 28.0% 35 61.0% 95(Do not buy these goods) 27.4% 219 39.0% 25 24.0% 22 24.0% 14 27.0% 26 25.0% 27 33.0% 34 40.0% 49 14.0% 22

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 16: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 73 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q08 In which village, town, retail park or other centre have the members of your household spent most money on domestic appliances, home entertainment and computers in the past six months ?

Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.3% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.9% 8 1.0% 1 6.0% 5 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 1.0% 8 8.0% 5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 6.2% 50 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.0% 14 0.0% 0 10.0% 12 15.0% 23Croydon 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 6.1% 48 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 27.0% 33 4.0% 6Epsom / Ewell 1.3% 10 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 5.0% 3 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 7.7% 62 3.0% 2 16.0% 14 8.0% 5 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 25.0% 26 5.0% 6 3.0% 5Horsham 6.6% 53 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 3.0% 4 30.0% 47Kingston 4.2% 33 7.0% 4 4.0% 4 7.0% 4 12.0% 12 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 3.0% 4 1.0% 2Leatherhead 2.6% 21 2.0% 1 10.0% 9 13.0% 8 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 3.5% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 20.0% 21 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 3Redhill 0.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 2.3% 19 5.0% 3 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 6.0% 6 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 2Internet / mail order /

catalogue 15.5% 124 10.0% 6 19.0% 17 12.0% 7 12.0% 12 19.0% 20 18.0% 19 17.0% 21 14.0% 22

Central London 0.7% 6 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woking 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 1.0% 8 6.0% 4 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.7% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 2.1% 17 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 6.0% 6 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 3

(Nowhere else) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not buy these goods) 34.6% 277 53.0% 34 32.0% 29 43.0% 25 40.0% 39 24.0% 26 40.0% 42 32.0% 40 28.0% 44

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 17: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 74 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

2nd Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.2% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 3.1% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.0% 10 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 9.0% 14Croydon 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Dorking 1.3% 11 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 3.0% 5Epsom / Ewell 0.7% 6 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 2.8% 22 1.0% 1 7.0% 6 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 8.0% 8 2.0% 2 2.0% 3Horsham 0.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 5Kingston 0.3% 2 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 1.0% 8 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 4.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 0.8% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Internet / mail order /

catalogue 2.8% 22 2.0% 1 5.0% 4 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 3.0% 4 4.0% 6

Central London 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woking 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.3% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Godalming 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 2.0% 16 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 3.0% 3 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 1.0% 2

(Nowhere else) 47.0% 376 37.0% 23 40.0% 36 46.0% 27 43.0% 42 55.0% 59 44.0% 46 54.0% 67 49.0% 77(Do not buy these goods) 34.6% 277 53.0% 34 32.0% 29 43.0% 25 40.0% 39 24.0% 26 40.0% 42 32.0% 40 28.0% 44

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 18: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 75 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q09 In which village, town, retail park or other centre have the members of your household spent most money on specialist non-food items such as china, glass, books, jewellery, photographic goods, musical instruments and sports equipment in the past six months?

Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 2.7% 21 22.0% 14 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 4.0% 32 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 6 1.0% 1 6.0% 7 11.0% 17Croydon 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Dorking 5.4% 43 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.0% 9 1.0% 1 20.0% 25 5.0% 8Epsom / Ewell 5.2% 42 2.0% 1 8.0% 7 15.0% 9 25.0% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 10.5% 84 5.0% 3 19.0% 17 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 37.0% 39 5.0% 6 7.0% 11Horsham 7.9% 63 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 5 36.0% 56Kingston 5.5% 44 12.0% 8 8.0% 7 8.0% 5 15.0% 15 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 2.0% 3Leatherhead 3.2% 25 3.0% 2 11.0% 10 14.0% 8 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Reigate 2.3% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.0% 17 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Redhill 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 1.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.2% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 1.5% 12 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 5Internet / mail order /

catalogue 10.7% 86 13.0% 8 9.0% 8 11.0% 7 10.0% 10 18.0% 19 6.0% 6 10.0% 12 10.0% 16

Central London 1.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 5Woking 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 1.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.0% 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 3.4% 27 2.0% 1 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 4.0% 4 5.0% 5 4.0% 5 3.0% 5

(Nowhere else) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not buy these goods) 33.0% 264 40.0% 25 35.0% 31 45.0% 27 30.0% 29 30.0% 32 36.0% 37 41.0% 51 20.0% 31

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 19: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 76 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

2nd Most Money Spent B&Q, Leatherhead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.5% 4 6.0% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 3.5% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.0% 23Croydon 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 1.9% 15 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 5.0% 6 1.0% 2Epsom / Ewell 1.6% 13 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 7.0% 7 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 3.6% 29 4.0% 3 7.0% 6 2.0% 1 5.0% 5 3.0% 3 4.0% 4 3.0% 4 2.0% 3Horsham 3.1% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 2.0% 2 10.0% 16Kingston 2.6% 21 7.0% 4 4.0% 4 2.0% 1 4.0% 4 2.0% 2 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 1.0% 2Leatherhead 1.2% 10 2.0% 1 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Reigate 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Redhill 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 1.2% 9 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 4 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.8% 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 3Internet / mail order /

catalogue 2.1% 17 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 3.0% 5

Central London 0.5% 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Woking 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Weybridge / Brooklands 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Godalming 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bramley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / can't

remember) 2.7% 21 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 5.0% 5 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 4.0% 6

(Nowhere else) 40.1% 321 35.0% 22 36.0% 32 43.0% 25 48.0% 47 40.0% 43 39.0% 41 38.0% 47 41.0% 64(Do not buy these goods) 33.0% 264 40.0% 25 35.0% 31 45.0% 27 30.0% 29 30.0% 32 36.0% 37 41.0% 51 20.0% 31

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 20: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 77 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Q10 In which village, town, leisure park or other centre does your household spend most money on the following leisure and culture activities ?

Recreation & Sport (eg gym, swimming, skating, bowling) Chessington World of

Adventure 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Thorpe Park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashted 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashted 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.6% 5 1.0% 1 5.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.8% 6 10.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 3.7% 30 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 1.0% 1 5.0% 6 11.0% 17Croydon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 9.1% 72 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 15.0% 16 2.0% 2 35.0% 43 5.0% 8Epsom / Ewell 4.4% 35 6.0% 4 1.0% 1 4.0% 2 28.0% 27 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Esher 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.3% 3 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 8.2% 66 10.0% 6 6.0% 5 7.0% 4 3.0% 3 5.0% 5 26.0% 27 8.0% 10 3.0% 5Horsham 6.0% 48 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 4.0% 5 27.0% 42Kingston 0.3% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 12.7% 102 17.0% 11 40.0% 36 39.0% 23 24.0% 23 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 3.0% 4 0.0% 0Reigate 1.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.0% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Redhill 1.7% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.0% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 3.2% 25 6.0% 4 2.0% 2 3.0% 2 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 6.0% 9Internet / mail order /

catalogue 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Central London 0.5% 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Woking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 3.6% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.0% 17 1.0% 1 7.0% 11East Horsley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 2.8% 22 4.0% 3 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 6.0% 9(Do not do this activity) 39.9% 319 43.0% 27 38.0% 34 42.0% 25 34.0% 33 48.0% 51 43.0% 45 41.0% 51 34.0% 53

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 21: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 78 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Cultural Services (eg cinema, theatre, concerts, museums) Chessington World of

Adventure 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Thorpe Park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashted 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashted 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 9.7% 77 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.0% 12 3.0% 3 10.0% 12 32.0% 50Croydon 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 10.6% 85 0.0% 0 10.0% 9 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 3.0% 3 4.0% 4 41.0% 51 9.0% 14Epsom / Ewell 13.8% 111 18.0% 11 18.0% 16 38.0% 22 51.0% 49 7.0% 7 0.0% 0 3.0% 4 0.0% 0Esher 2.4% 19 26.0% 16 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 12.1% 97 6.0% 4 17.0% 15 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 49.0% 51 8.0% 10 7.0% 11Horsham 1.8% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.0% 14Kingston 0.2% 2 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 4.9% 39 5.0% 3 17.0% 15 22.0% 13 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 4.7% 38 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 26.0% 28 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 2.0% 3Redhill 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Other 0.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Internet / mail order /

catalogue 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Central London 9.5% 76 8.0% 5 8.0% 7 9.0% 5 17.0% 16 11.0% 12 7.0% 7 12.0% 15 5.0% 8Woking 0.9% 7 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0East Horsley 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 3.3% 27 4.0% 3 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 7.0% 7 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 6.0% 9(Do not do this activity) 24.2% 194 27.0% 17 25.0% 22 22.0% 13 16.0% 16 29.0% 31 25.0% 26 19.0% 23 29.0% 45

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 22: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 79 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Games of Chance (eg bingo, casino) Chessington World of

Adventure 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Thorpe Park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashted 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashted 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 1.2% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 4.0% 6Croydon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Epsom / Ewell 0.5% 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Esher 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Horsham 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Kingston 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.6% 5 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Internet / mail order /

catalogue 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Central London 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woking 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0East Horsley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not do this activity) 96.1% 768 96.0% 61 99.0% 89 94.0% 56 97.0% 94 96.0% 103 97.0% 101 96.0% 119 94.0% 147

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 23: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 80 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Restaurants, Cafés & Pubs Chessington World of

Adventure 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Thorpe Park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashted 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashted 0.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 2.1% 17 0.0% 0 13.0% 12 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 4.1% 33 41.0% 26 5.0% 4 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 2.7% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 12.0% 19Croydon 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Dorking 12.6% 101 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 9.0% 10 3.0% 3 63.0% 78 4.0% 6Epsom / Ewell 7.4% 60 2.0% 1 6.0% 5 15.0% 9 41.0% 40 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Esher 1.4% 11 13.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.6% 4 0.0% 0 5.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 4.1% 33 1.0% 1 5.0% 4 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.0% 22 1.0% 1 2.0% 3Horsham 6.2% 50 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 30.0% 47Kingston 0.8% 6 4.0% 3 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Leatherhead 7.4% 59 2.0% 1 22.0% 20 47.0% 28 8.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Reigate 5.2% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 34.0% 36 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 2Redhill 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.6% 5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 3Other 3.6% 29 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 6.0% 6 11.0% 11 0.0% 0 4.0% 6Internet / mail order /

catalogue 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Central London 1.7% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 3.0% 4 0.0% 0Woking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 2.0% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.0% 15 1.0% 1 0.0% 0East Horsley 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 19.6% 157 14.0% 9 21.0% 19 11.0% 7 16.0% 16 20.0% 21 16.0% 17 14.0% 17 33.0% 52(Do not do this activity) 16.1% 129 20.0% 13 18.0% 16 16.0% 9 12.0% 12 18.0% 19 26.0% 27 11.0% 14 12.0% 19

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 24: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 81 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Hairdressing Salons & Personal Grooming Chessington World of

Adventure 0.1% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Thorpe Park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bluewater 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lakeside 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Craddocks Parade, Ashted 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street, Ashted 2.4% 19 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 18.0% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 4.2% 34 1.0% 1 29.0% 26 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 3.5% 28 40.0% 25 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Crawley 1.5% 12 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 8Croydon 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 2Dorking 13.1% 105 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 9.0% 10 4.0% 4 61.0% 75 9.0% 14Epsom / Ewell 5.4% 43 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 10.0% 6 28.0% 27 5.0% 5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Esher 0.3% 2 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 2.0% 16 2.0% 1 15.0% 13 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 3.5% 28 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.0% 18 2.0% 2 3.0% 5Horsham 8.6% 69 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 42.0% 66Kingston 0.2% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 8.0% 64 6.0% 4 25.0% 22 43.0% 25 8.0% 8 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Reigate 5.3% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 37.0% 40 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Redhill 1.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 6 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Sutton / Cheam 0.5% 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wimbledon 0.5% 4 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 3.7% 29 4.0% 3 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 6.0% 6 6.0% 6 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 7.0% 11Internet / mail order /

catalogue 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 2

Central London 0.7% 6 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woking 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cranleigh 3.0% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.0% 21 1.0% 1 1.0% 2East Horsley 0.7% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 7.1% 57 9.0% 6 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 5.0% 5 13.0% 14 2.0% 2 15.0% 23(Do not do this activity) 24.0% 192 22.0% 14 21.0% 19 36.0% 21 24.0% 23 24.0% 26 27.0% 28 30.0% 37 15.0% 23

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Q11 How does your household normally travel to… Its main food &grocery shopping destination Car / van (as driver) 74.6% 596 84.0% 53 84.0% 75 64.0% 38 71.0% 69 76.0% 81 78.0% 81 66.0% 81 75.0% 117Car / van (as passenger) 7.3% 59 2.0% 1 8.0% 7 6.0% 4 7.0% 7 5.0% 5 6.0% 6 9.0% 11 11.0% 17Bus 3.6% 28 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 4.0% 2 5.0% 5 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 4.0% 5 6.0% 9Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Walk 7.7% 62 7.0% 4 4.0% 4 21.0% 12 5.0% 5 7.0% 7 5.0% 5 18.0% 22 1.0% 2Taxi 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Train 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.7% 5 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Other 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 1.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 5(Do not travel, goods

delivered) 3.8% 30 4.0% 3 2.0% 2 4.0% 2 7.0% 7 6.0% 6 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 3.0% 5

(Do not do this activity) 0.4% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 25: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 82 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Where it spends most money on clothes & shoes Car / van (as driver) 70.7% 566 78.0% 49 79.0% 71 57.0% 34 66.0% 64 73.0% 78 69.0% 72 64.0% 79 76.0% 119Car / van (as passenger) 4.9% 39 1.0% 1 6.0% 5 1.0% 1 6.0% 6 2.0% 2 5.0% 5 8.0% 10 6.0% 9Bus 6.5% 52 1.0% 1 4.0% 4 16.0% 9 5.0% 5 5.0% 5 7.0% 7 4.0% 5 10.0% 16Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Walk 5.2% 41 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 16.0% 9 11.0% 11 5.0% 5 2.0% 2 10.0% 12 0.0% 0Taxi 0.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Train 1.9% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 6.0% 7 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 2Other 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 1.7% 13 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 4.0% 6(Do not travel, goods

delivered) 2.2% 17 3.0% 2 4.0% 4 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 4.0% 5 1.0% 2

(Do not do this activity) 6.1% 49 15.0% 10 6.0% 5 4.0% 2 4.0% 4 8.0% 9 13.0% 14 2.0% 2 2.0% 3

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Where it spends most money on furniture, carpets & soft household furnishings Car / van (as driver) 61.9% 496 55.0% 35 69.0% 62 60.0% 35 55.0% 53 73.0% 78 59.0% 61 52.0% 64 68.0% 106Car / van (as passenger) 7.2% 58 1.0% 1 8.0% 7 6.0% 4 7.0% 7 3.0% 3 5.0% 5 14.0% 17 9.0% 14Bus 3.0% 24 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 7.0% 4 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 6.0% 9Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Walk 1.6% 13 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 8.0% 5 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Taxi 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Train 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 2.0% 16 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 6.0% 9(Do not travel, goods

delivered) 3.1% 25 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 2 2.0% 2 3.0% 3 5.0% 5 7.0% 9 1.0% 2

(Do not do this activity) 20.6% 165 43.0% 27 18.0% 16 14.0% 8 29.0% 28 13.0% 14 26.0% 27 23.0% 28 10.0% 16

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Where it spends most money on DIY & decorating goods Car / van (as driver) 66.7% 533 69.0% 44 72.0% 65 66.0% 39 64.0% 62 74.0% 79 70.0% 73 52.0% 64 69.0% 108Car / van (as passenger) 8.4% 67 1.0% 1 11.0% 10 3.0% 2 9.0% 9 3.0% 3 6.0% 6 16.0% 20 11.0% 17Bus 2.5% 20 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 7.0% 4 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 5.0% 8Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Walk 2.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.0% 7 4.0% 4 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 1.0% 2Taxi 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Train 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Other 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 1.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 5.0% 8(Do not travel, goods

delivered) 1.4% 11 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 4 2.0% 3

(Do not do this activity) 16.0% 128 30.0% 19 15.0% 13 10.0% 6 18.0% 17 13.0% 14 19.0% 20 22.0% 27 7.0% 11Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Where it spends most money on domestic appliances, home entertainment & computers Car / van (as driver) 59.6% 477 58.0% 37 64.0% 57 60.0% 35 59.0% 57 68.0% 73 55.0% 57 42.0% 52 69.0% 108Car / van (as passenger) 7.6% 60 1.0% 1 5.0% 4 5.0% 3 7.0% 7 5.0% 5 4.0% 4 14.0% 17 12.0% 19Bus 2.4% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.0% 5 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 4.0% 6Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Walk 3.5% 28 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 10.0% 6 6.0% 6 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 9.0% 11 0.0% 0Taxi 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Train 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 1.1% 9 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 5(Do not travel, goods

delivered) 7.8% 63 3.0% 2 11.0% 10 5.0% 3 4.0% 4 8.0% 9 12.0% 12 11.0% 14 6.0% 9

(Do not do this activity) 17.3% 138 38.0% 24 16.0% 14 10.0% 6 18.0% 17 12.0% 13 26.0% 27 22.0% 27 6.0% 9

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 26: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 83 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Where it spends most money on specialist non-food items such as china, glass books, jewellery, photographic goods, musical instruments & sports equipment

Car / van (as driver) 64.7% 518 62.0% 39 71.0% 64 60.0% 35 61.0% 59 71.0% 76 59.0% 61 58.0% 72 71.0% 111Car / van (as passenger) 6.2% 49 2.0% 1 6.0% 5 4.0% 2 7.0% 7 4.0% 4 5.0% 5 8.0% 10 9.0% 14Bus 3.6% 28 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 9.0% 5 5.0% 5 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 3.0% 4 6.0% 9Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Walk 4.0% 32 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 11.0% 7 6.0% 6 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 8.0% 10 1.0% 2Taxi 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Train 0.8% 6 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.4% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Other 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 2.2% 18 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 4.0% 5 5.0% 8(Do not travel, goods

delivered) 2.9% 23 3.0% 2 3.0% 3 3.0% 2 4.0% 4 3.0% 3 4.0% 4 3.0% 4 1.0% 2

(Do not do this activity) 15.0% 120 30.0% 19 15.0% 13 11.0% 7 15.0% 15 12.0% 13 26.0% 27 14.0% 17 6.0% 9

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Its main leisure desintation Car / van (as driver) 70.4% 563 88.0% 56 80.0% 72 56.0% 33 71.0% 69 70.0% 75 77.0% 80 55.0% 68 71.0% 111Car / van (as passenger) 6.3% 50 3.0% 2 9.0% 8 3.0% 2 8.0% 8 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 11.0% 14 7.0% 11Bus 2.8% 22 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 7.0% 4 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 4.0% 4 2.0% 2 3.0% 5Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Walk 7.2% 57 2.0% 1 4.0% 4 18.0% 11 6.0% 6 5.0% 5 2.0% 2 18.0% 22 4.0% 6Taxi 0.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Train 1.0% 8 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Bicycle 1.0% 8 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Other 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 2.2% 18 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 4 2.0% 2 4.0% 5 2.0% 3(Do not travel, goods

delivered) 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

(Do not do this activity) 8.1% 65 1.0% 1 5.0% 4 10.0% 6 8.0% 8 8.0% 9 10.0% 10 8.0% 10 11.0% 17

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Q12 Does the availability of cheap and convenient car parking affect your decision about where to… Shop for food & groceries Yes 52.7% 422 44.0% 28 58.0% 52 52.0% 31 55.0% 53 55.0% 59 52.0% 54 49.0% 60 54.0% 84No 43.3% 346 52.0% 33 40.0% 36 43.0% 25 42.0% 41 35.0% 37 43.0% 45 49.0% 60 44.0% 69Sometimes 3.0% 24 3.0% 2 1.0% 1 5.0% 3 1.0% 1 8.0% 9 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 2.0% 3(Don’t know / varies) 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not do this activity) 0.7% 6 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Shop for clothes & shoes Yes 44.7% 357 38.0% 24 41.0% 37 39.0% 23 46.0% 45 48.0% 51 42.0% 44 45.0% 56 50.0% 78No 46.1% 369 43.0% 27 49.0% 44 50.0% 30 48.0% 47 40.0% 43 43.0% 45 53.0% 65 44.0% 69Sometimes 3.6% 29 5.0% 3 4.0% 4 8.0% 5 1.0% 1 7.0% 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 8(Don’t know / varies) 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not do this activity) 5.4% 43 14.0% 9 6.0% 5 2.0% 1 4.0% 4 5.0% 5 14.0% 15 2.0% 2 1.0% 2Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Shop for Furniture, carpets and soft household furnishings Yes 38.3% 307 23.0% 15 38.0% 34 37.0% 22 33.0% 32 46.0% 49 36.0% 37 37.0% 46 46.0% 72No 43.7% 350 35.0% 22 49.0% 44 47.0% 28 43.0% 42 39.0% 42 39.0% 41 51.0% 63 44.0% 69Sometimes 3.4% 27 6.0% 4 0.0% 0 7.0% 4 1.0% 1 8.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 9(Don’t know / varies) 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0(Do not do this activity) 14.1% 112 36.0% 23 12.0% 11 9.0% 5 23.0% 22 6.0% 6 24.0% 25 11.0% 14 4.0% 6

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 27: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 84 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

Shop for DIY & decorating goods Yes 42.6% 340 34.0% 22 41.0% 37 40.0% 24 40.0% 39 47.0% 50 39.0% 41 41.0% 51 50.0% 78No 43.6% 349 35.0% 22 48.0% 43 47.0% 28 46.0% 45 39.0% 42 41.0% 43 48.0% 59 43.0% 67Sometimes 2.7% 22 4.0% 3 0.0% 0 7.0% 4 0.0% 0 7.0% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.0% 8(Don’t know / varies) 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not do this activity) 10.9% 87 27.0% 17 11.0% 10 6.0% 4 14.0% 14 6.0% 6 19.0% 20 11.0% 14 2.0% 3

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Shop for domestic appliances, home entertainment & computers Yes 40.0% 320 27.0% 17 39.0% 35 38.0% 22 38.0% 37 47.0% 50 35.0% 36 37.0% 46 49.0% 77No 44.1% 353 36.0% 23 49.0% 44 46.0% 27 45.0% 44 40.0% 43 42.0% 44 50.0% 62 43.0% 67Sometimes 3.0% 24 4.0% 3 0.0% 0 7.0% 4 0.0% 0 7.0% 7 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 5.0% 8(Don’t know / varies) 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not do this activity) 12.3% 98 33.0% 21 11.0% 10 9.0% 5 16.0% 16 6.0% 6 20.0% 21 12.0% 15 3.0% 5

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Shop for specialist non-food items such as china, glass books, jewellery, photographic goods, musical instruments & sports equipment Yes 40.3% 323 30.0% 19 38.0% 34 37.0% 22 37.0% 36 46.0% 49 36.0% 37 38.0% 47 50.0% 78No 46.0% 368 35.0% 22 51.0% 46 49.0% 29 54.0% 52 41.0% 44 40.0% 42 52.0% 64 44.0% 69Sometimes 2.7% 22 4.0% 3 0.0% 0 7.0% 4 0.0% 0 7.0% 7 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 4.0% 6(Don’t know / varies) 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Do not do this activity) 10.7% 86 31.0% 20 11.0% 10 7.0% 4 9.0% 9 6.0% 6 22.0% 23 9.0% 11 2.0% 3

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Visit to use leisure facilities Yes 41.7% 334 37.0% 23 46.0% 41 36.0% 21 42.0% 41 49.0% 52 42.0% 44 38.0% 47 41.0% 64No 49.7% 398 59.0% 37 48.0% 43 54.0% 32 51.0% 49 36.0% 38 51.0% 53 55.0% 68 49.0% 77Sometimes 2.4% 20 3.0% 2 1.0% 1 6.0% 4 1.0% 1 10.0% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2(Don’t know / varies) 0.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 2(Do not do this activity) 5.6% 45 1.0% 1 5.0% 4 4.0% 2 5.0% 5 5.0% 5 7.0% 7 6.0% 7 8.0% 13

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 SEX Sex of respondent Male 30.7% 246 37.0% 23 25.0% 22 33.0% 20 35.0% 34 23.0% 25 36.0% 37 29.0% 36 31.0% 48Female 69.3% 554 63.0% 40 75.0% 67 67.0% 40 65.0% 63 77.0% 82 64.0% 67 71.0% 88 69.0% 108

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 AGE Could I just ask, how old are you? 18 to 24 years 2.3% 19 4.0% 3 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 5.0% 5 2.0% 2 2.0% 325 to 34 years 5.7% 45 5.0% 3 4.0% 4 13.0% 8 6.0% 6 8.0% 9 2.0% 2 4.0% 5 6.0% 935 to 44 years 19.6% 157 23.0% 15 20.0% 18 9.0% 5 21.0% 20 18.0% 19 20.0% 21 21.0% 26 21.0% 3345 to 54 years 23.2% 186 21.0% 13 23.0% 21 28.0% 17 20.0% 19 27.0% 29 18.0% 19 26.0% 32 23.0% 3655 to 64 years 24.4% 195 26.0% 16 22.0% 20 21.0% 12 25.0% 24 21.0% 22 29.0% 30 22.0% 27 27.0% 4265+ years 24.0% 192 19.0% 12 29.0% 26 26.0% 15 25.0% 24 24.0% 26 25.0% 26 24.0% 30 21.0% 33(Refused) 0.9% 7 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 CAR How many cars does your household own or have the use of? None 5.9% 47 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 12.0% 7 8.0% 8 6.0% 6 3.0% 3 9.0% 11 5.0% 8One 37.8% 302 22.0% 14 40.0% 36 45.0% 27 37.0% 36 41.0% 44 42.0% 44 40.0% 49 34.0% 53Two 43.2% 346 53.0% 34 45.0% 40 31.0% 18 44.0% 43 43.0% 46 35.0% 36 42.0% 52 49.0% 77Three or more 12.5% 100 21.0% 13 11.0% 10 12.0% 7 10.0% 10 10.0% 11 19.0% 20 9.0% 11 12.0% 19(Refused) 0.6% 4 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 28: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 85 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

CAR2 Is there a car usually available for shopping and leisure purposes ? Always available 78.8% 630 90.0% 57 83.0% 75 61.0% 36 74.0% 72 61.0% 65 88.0% 92 82.0% 101 85.0% 133Usually available 14.1% 113 5.0% 3 13.0% 12 27.0% 16 15.0% 15 32.0% 34 6.0% 6 9.0% 11 10.0% 16Rarely available 2.2% 17 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 6.0% 4 5.0% 5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 3.0% 5Never available 4.2% 34 3.0% 2 2.0% 2 5.0% 3 5.0% 5 6.0% 6 4.0% 4 7.0% 9 2.0% 3(Refused) 0.8% 6 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 INT Do you have access to the internet either at work or at home? Yes both 36.8% 294 53.0% 34 30.0% 27 33.0% 20 41.0% 40 37.0% 40 36.0% 37 32.0% 40 37.0% 58At home only 39.0% 312 33.0% 21 42.0% 38 35.0% 21 36.0% 35 41.0% 44 39.0% 41 45.0% 56 37.0% 58At work only 2.4% 20 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 4.0% 2 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 5.0% 8No access to the internet 21.1% 169 14.0% 9 25.0% 22 26.0% 15 21.0% 20 18.0% 19 22.0% 23 22.0% 27 21.0% 33(Refused) 0.6% 5 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 WOR Which of these activities best describes what you are doing at present? Employee in full time job

(30 hours + per week) 31.9% 255 32.0% 20 23.0% 21 31.0% 18 34.0% 33 31.0% 33 29.0% 30 26.0% 32 43.0% 67

Employee in part time job (under 30 hours per week)

16.9% 135 20.0% 13 12.0% 11 15.0% 9 12.0% 12 24.0% 26 12.0% 12 23.0% 28 16.0% 25

Self employed, full or part time

5.7% 46 3.0% 2 13.0% 12 6.0% 4 7.0% 7 7.0% 7 5.0% 5 6.0% 7 1.0% 2

On a Government-supported training programme e.g. Modern Apprenticeship, Training for Work

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Full time education 0.9% 7 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 2Unemployed and available

for work 2.3% 18 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 5.0% 8

Permanently sick / disabled 0.8% 6 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Wholly retired from work 34.1% 273 30.0% 19 40.0% 36 36.0% 21 35.0% 34 33.0% 35 36.0% 37 31.0% 38 33.0% 52Looking after the home 5.8% 46 13.0% 8 5.0% 4 5.0% 3 9.0% 9 0.0% 0 9.0% 9 10.0% 12 0.0% 0Other 0.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0(Refused) 1.3% 10 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 2.0% 1 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 1.0% 2

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 DIS Do you have any long standing illness, disability or infirmity that affects your day to day activities? Yes 13.6% 109 11.0% 7 15.0% 13 16.0% 9 12.0% 12 12.0% 13 19.0% 20 9.0% 11 15.0% 23No 84.0% 672 88.0% 56 80.0% 72 83.0% 49 85.0% 82 87.0% 93 76.0% 79 91.0% 112 82.0% 128(Refused) 2.4% 20 1.0% 1 5.0% 4 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 1.0% 1 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 3.0% 5Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 29: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 86 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

Column %ges. 200307 NEMS market research

ETH To which of these groups do you consider that you belong? British 91.6% 733 90.0% 57 92.0% 83 95.0% 56 90.0% 87 93.0% 99 87.0% 91 95.0% 117 91.0% 142Irish 1.2% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 4.0% 4 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Other White background 4.0% 32 9.0% 6 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 9.0% 9 2.0% 2 5.0% 8Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0African 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other Black or Black British

background 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inidan 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pakistani 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bangladeshi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other Asian or Asian British

background 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Chinese 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Black Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Black African 0.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 2White and Asian 0.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other Mixed background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 2.3% 19 1.0% 1 5.0% 4 1.0% 1 3.0% 3 2.0% 2 2.0% 2 1.0% 1 3.0% 5

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 SEG Socio economic grouping A 8.1% 65 13.0% 8 9.0% 8 6.0% 4 14.0% 14 8.0% 9 7.0% 7 5.0% 6 6.0% 9B 22.0% 176 32.0% 20 15.0% 13 14.0% 8 24.0% 23 22.0% 23 22.0% 23 19.0% 23 26.0% 41C1 33.8% 271 29.0% 18 41.0% 37 38.0% 22 35.0% 34 41.0% 44 36.0% 37 30.0% 37 26.0% 41C2 17.2% 138 11.0% 7 16.0% 14 25.0% 15 12.0% 12 17.0% 18 12.0% 12 14.0% 17 27.0% 42D 7.9% 63 6.0% 4 6.0% 5 4.0% 2 8.0% 8 6.0% 6 9.0% 9 10.0% 12 10.0% 16E 0.3% 3 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 10.7% 85 9.0% 6 12.0% 11 12.0% 7 7.0% 7 5.0% 5 14.0% 15 22.0% 27 5.0% 8

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 QUOTA Quota Area Zone 1 7.9% 63 100.0% 63 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Zone 2 11.2% 90 0.0% 0 100.0% 90 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Zone 3 7.4% 59 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 59 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Zone 4 12.1% 97 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 97 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Zone 5 13.4% 107 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 107 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Zone 6 13.0% 104 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 104 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Zone 7 15.4% 123 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 123 0.0% 0Zone 8 19.5% 156 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 156

Weighted base: 800 63 90 59 97 107 104 123 156Sample: 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 30: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 31: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

APPENDIX 2 In Centre – Dorking Leatherhead Ashtead Fetcham Bookham

Page 32: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 33: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 74 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q01 How did you travel to [name of centre] today ? Car driver 57.8% 59 60.7% 17 56.8% 42 18.8% 3 65.9% 27 64.4% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 57.8% 59 0.0% 0Car passenger 4.9% 5 3.6% 1 5.4% 4 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0Bus 9.8% 10 7.1% 2 10.8% 8 18.8% 3 2.4% 1 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.8% 10 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Rail 2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 12.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Taxi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0On foot 25.5% 26 25.0% 7 25.7% 19 43.8% 7 24.4% 10 20.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.5% 26 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 Q02 How long do you intend to stay in [name of centre] today? Less than 30 minutes 6.9% 7 14.3% 4 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 030-59 minutes 16.7% 17 25.0% 7 13.5% 10 18.8% 3 12.2% 5 20.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 17 0.0% 0Between 1 – 2 hours 32.4% 33 17.9% 5 37.8% 28 25.0% 4 41.5% 17 26.7% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32.4% 33 0.0% 0Over 2 – 3 hours 19.6% 20 14.3% 4 21.6% 16 12.5% 2 12.2% 5 28.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 19.6% 20 0.0% 0Over 3 – 4 hours 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Over 4 hours 21.6% 22 28.6% 8 18.9% 14 31.3% 5 24.4% 10 15.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.6% 22 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 Q03 How often do you visit [name of centre] (including Sunday) ? Everyday 17.6% 18 25.0% 7 14.9% 11 25.0% 4 22.0% 9 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.6% 18 0.0% 04 to 6 days a week 21.6% 22 21.4% 6 21.6% 16 37.5% 6 14.6% 6 22.2% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.6% 22 0.0% 02 to 3 days a week 33.3% 34 28.6% 8 35.1% 26 25.0% 4 34.1% 14 35.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33.3% 34 0.0% 01 day a week 17.6% 18 10.7% 3 20.3% 15 6.3% 1 24.4% 10 15.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.6% 18 0.0% 0Once every 2 weeks 2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Once every month 2.9% 3 3.6% 1 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Once a quarter 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Less often than once a

quarter 2.9% 3 7.1% 2 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0

First time today 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 34: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 75 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q04 What is the main reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 35.3% 36 21.4% 6 40.5% 30 18.8% 3 39.0% 16 37.8% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 35.3% 36 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

16.7% 17 17.9% 5 16.2% 12 18.8% 3 17.1% 7 15.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 17 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

11.8% 12 7.1% 2 13.5% 10 0.0% 0 14.6% 6 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.8% 12 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 27.5% 28 46.4% 13 20.3% 15 56.3% 9 26.8% 11 17.8% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.5% 28 0.0% 0To meet someone 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 2.0% 2 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Going for a walk 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0(No particular pattern) 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 35: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 76 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q05 Is there any other reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 27.5% 28 35.7% 10 24.3% 18 12.5% 2 34.1% 14 26.7% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.5% 28 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

26.5% 27 17.9% 5 29.7% 22 18.8% 3 26.8% 11 28.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 26.5% 27 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

9.8% 10 10.7% 3 9.5% 7 18.8% 3 4.9% 2 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.8% 10 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Work 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0To meet someone 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Other 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Browsing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Visit charity shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No other reason/s) 27.5% 28 32.1% 9 25.7% 19 43.8% 7 22.0% 9 26.7% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.5% 28 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 36: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 77 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q06 What are the main things that you LIKE about [name of centre] ? Near / convenient 36.3% 37 35.7% 10 36.5% 27 50.0% 8 43.9% 18 24.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 36.3% 37 0.0% 0Good public transport links 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Parking is easy 5.9% 6 3.6% 1 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 9.8% 4 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0Parking is cheap 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of congestion on roads 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pedestrianised streets 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Little traffic-pedestrian

conflict 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Good directional signs to Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Convenient drop off / pick up stops for buses / good location of bus station

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Ease of access to all (with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Well signposted route ways / good local maps

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other access / transport factor

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

General cleanliness of shopping streets

2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Feels safe / absence of threatening individuals / groups

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Presence of police / other security measures

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice busy feel 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Not too crowded 10.8% 11 7.1% 2 12.2% 9 6.3% 1 14.6% 6 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0Character / atmosphere 52.0% 53 50.0% 14 52.7% 39 18.8% 3 51.2% 21 64.4% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 52.0% 53 0.0% 0Historic buildings / tourist

attractions 7.8% 8 10.7% 3 6.8% 5 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0

Other environmental factor 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Selection / choice of

independent / specialist shops

27.5% 28 25.0% 7 28.4% 21 37.5% 6 19.5% 8 31.1% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.5% 28 0.0% 0

Selection / choice of multiple shops (i.e. high street chains such as Boots etc)

5.9% 6 0.0% 0 8.1% 6 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0

Quality of shops 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Specified shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Prices are competitive in

shops compared to other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 37: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 78 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

town/district centres Play area for children 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of places to eat 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Range of pubs / bars 2.9% 3 3.6% 1 2.7% 2 12.5% 2 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Range of services (banks,

insurance, hairdressers, etc)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Range of leisure facilities 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Other points on shops /

attractions 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

I like everything about [centre]

2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Community spirit 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Friendly 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice village 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is rural 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice place 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The butchers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fresh food shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pet shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Post Office 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is compact 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is quiet 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The market 3.9% 4 7.1% 2 2.7% 2 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0(No opinion) 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 11.8% 12 14.3% 4 10.8% 8 18.8% 3 7.3% 3 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.8% 12 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 38: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 79 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q07 What are the main things you DISLIKE about [name of centre]? Unsafe for pedestrians /

traffic conflict 13.7% 14 7.1% 2 16.2% 12 12.5% 2 17.1% 7 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.7% 14 0.0% 0

Not enough pedestrianisation 4.9% 5 7.1% 2 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0Difficulties in parking 16.7% 17 32.1% 9 10.8% 8 6.3% 1 17.1% 7 20.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 17 0.0% 0Location of parking 2.9% 3 3.6% 1 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Parking is expensive 7.8% 8 10.7% 3 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 12.2% 5 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0Poor public transport links 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Road congestion 14.7% 15 25.0% 7 10.8% 8 0.0% 0 29.3% 12 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.7% 15 0.0% 0Poor directional signs to

Centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor signage / routeways within centre / lack of maps of centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inconvenient location of bus stops / bus station

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Difficulties with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other transport / access factor

2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Dirty shopping streets 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 5.4% 4 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0Feels unsafe / presence of

threatening individuals / groups

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Lack of police presence / other security measures

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Lack of street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Not busy enough 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over-crowded 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other environmental factor 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0General lack of choice of

multiple shops 14.7% 15 7.1% 2 17.6% 13 25.0% 4 12.2% 5 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.7% 15 0.0% 0

General lack of independent / specialist shops

8.8% 9 0.0% 0 12.2% 9 6.3% 1 12.2% 5 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0

Quality of shops is inadequate

2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0

Shops too small 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of a larger supermarket 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 9.5% 7 0.0% 0 9.8% 4 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0Specified shops absent 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of places to

eat 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Inadequate range of services 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of leisure

facilities 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Absence of play areas for 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 39: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 80 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

children Other 6.9% 7 7.1% 2 6.8% 5 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0I dislike everything about

[centre] 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor pavements 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Poor road condition 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Roadworks 3.9% 4 7.1% 2 2.7% 2 6.3% 1 4.9% 2 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0In-filling 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No character 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Quality of greengrocers

inadequate 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Qualoty of childrens shops inadequate

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Quality of clothes shops inadequate

2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Too many charity shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No clothes shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0No electrical stores 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Need a Marks and Spencers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Don't want a betting shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too much development 2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Too many empty shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0(No opinion) 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 26.5% 27 32.1% 9 24.3% 18 25.0% 4 24.4% 10 28.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 26.5% 27 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 40: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 81 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q08 How could [name of centre] best be improved for shopping? Specified new shop 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 9.5% 7 0.0% 0 9.8% 4 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0Better choice of shops in

general 34.3% 35 17.9% 5 40.5% 30 50.0% 8 31.7% 13 31.1% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 34.3% 35 0.0% 0

Better quality of shops 10.8% 11 7.1% 2 12.2% 9 12.5% 2 17.1% 7 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 7.8% 8 3.6% 1 9.5% 7 0.0% 0 14.6% 6 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 5.9% 6 3.6% 1 6.8% 5 12.5% 2 2.4% 1 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0More parking 8.8% 9 21.4% 6 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 12.2% 5 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 8.8% 9 21.4% 6 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 3.9% 4 10.7% 3 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 2.9% 3 3.6% 1 2.7% 2 12.5% 2 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0

Improved security measures / policing

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More children’s play areas 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redevelopments/changes to

site 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Other 6.9% 7 7.1% 2 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0A butchers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Clothes shops 3.9% 4 3.6% 1 4.1% 3 12.5% 2 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0Childrens shops 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 5.4% 4 6.3% 1 4.9% 2 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0Delicatessen 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Greengrocer 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 6.8% 5 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0An electrical store 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woolworths 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks and Spencers 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0A better / bigger supermarket 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0A one way system 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Shoe shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Less empty shops 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Independent shops 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Free parking 2.0% 2 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 13.7% 14 17.9% 5 12.2% 9 6.3% 1 17.1% 7 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.7% 14 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 10.8% 11 14.3% 4 9.5% 7 12.5% 2 7.3% 3 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 41: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 82 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q09 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Yes 22.5% 23 10.7% 3 27.0% 20 12.5% 2 36.6% 15 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22.5% 23 0.0% 0No 63.7% 65 67.9% 19 62.2% 46 81.3% 13 58.5% 24 62.2% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 63.7% 65 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 13.7% 14 21.4% 6 10.8% 8 6.3% 1 4.9% 2 24.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.7% 14 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 Q10 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Those who said Yes at Q09 Cinema 13.0% 3 0.0% 0 15.0% 3 0.0% 0 6.7% 1 33.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.0% 3 0.0% 0Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 4.3% 1 33.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 6.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 0.0% 0Nightclubs 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 21.7% 5 0.0% 0 25.0% 5 50.0% 1 20.0% 3 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.7% 5 0.0% 0Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A swimming pool 8.7% 2 0.0% 0 10.0% 2 0.0% 0 13.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.7% 2 0.0% 0Childrens facilities 47.8% 11 66.7% 2 45.0% 9 0.0% 0 53.3% 8 50.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 47.8% 11 0.0% 0Skate park 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 50.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 6.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 0.0% 0

Base: 23 3 20 2 15 6 0 0 0 23 0 Q11 Where should these leisure facilities be situated? Those who said Yes at Q09 Don't know 34.8% 8 0.0% 0 40.0% 8 50.0% 1 33.3% 5 33.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 34.8% 8 0.0% 0Near leisure centre 17.4% 4 0.0% 0 20.0% 4 0.0% 0 20.0% 3 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.4% 4 0.0% 0Town centre 13.0% 3 0.0% 0 15.0% 3 50.0% 1 13.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.0% 3 0.0% 0Where the existing one is 8.7% 2 0.0% 0 10.0% 2 0.0% 0 13.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.7% 2 0.0% 0Other 8.7% 2 33.3% 1 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 6.7% 1 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.7% 2 0.0% 0Near the park 8.7% 2 33.3% 1 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 13.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.7% 2 0.0% 0High Street 4.3% 1 33.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 0.0% 0Near the centre 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 1 0.0% 0Base: 23 3 20 2 15 6 0 0 0 23 0 Q12 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Yes 10.8% 11 10.7% 3 10.8% 8 0.0% 0 14.6% 6 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0No 76.5% 78 67.9% 19 79.7% 59 93.8% 15 78.0% 32 68.9% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 76.5% 78 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 12.7% 13 21.4% 6 9.5% 7 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 20.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 42: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 83 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q13 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Those who said Yes at Q12 Cinema 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 27.3% 3 100.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 40.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.3% 3 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 72.7% 8 33.3% 1 87.5% 7 0.0% 0 100.0% 6 40.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 72.7% 8 0.0% 0Nightclubs 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 12.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 11 3 8 0 6 5 0 0 0 11 0

Page 43: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 84 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q14 How could [name of centre] be improved to encourage people to spend more leisure time here? Specified new leisure

operator 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better choice of leisure destination in general

3.9% 4 3.6% 1 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0

Better quality of leisure uses 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 6.8% 5 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 2.9% 3 3.6% 1 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 6.9% 7 3.6% 1 8.1% 6 6.3% 1 9.8% 4 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0More parking 3.9% 4 10.7% 3 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 2.4% 1 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 10.8% 11 17.9% 5 8.1% 6 12.5% 2 12.2% 5 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 4.9% 5 3.6% 1 5.4% 4 6.3% 1 4.9% 2 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 9.5% 7 12.5% 2 4.9% 2 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0

Better late night public transport

5.9% 6 3.6% 1 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Improved security measures /

policing 2.9% 3 7.1% 2 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Redevelopments/changes to site

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Other 8.8% 9 14.3% 4 6.8% 5 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0More restaurants 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Swimming pool 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Youth facilities 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Better cinema 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 6.3% 1 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0A nightclub 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parks 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 39.2% 40 35.7% 10 40.5% 30 37.5% 6 36.6% 15 42.2% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 39.2% 40 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 6.9% 7 10.7% 3 5.4% 4 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 13.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 GEN Gender Male 27.5% 28 100.0% 28 0.0% 0 31.3% 5 24.4% 10 28.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.5% 28 0.0% 0Female 72.5% 74 0.0% 0 100.0% 74 68.8% 11 75.6% 31 71.1% 32 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 72.5% 74 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 44: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 85 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

AGE Age 16 – 24 years 6.9% 7 10.7% 3 5.4% 4 43.8% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 025 – 34 years 8.8% 9 7.1% 2 9.5% 7 56.3% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 035 – 44 years 15.7% 16 7.1% 2 18.9% 14 0.0% 0 39.0% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.7% 16 0.0% 045 – 54 years 24.5% 25 28.6% 8 23.0% 17 0.0% 0 61.0% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 055 – 64 years 23.5% 24 28.6% 8 21.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 53.3% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.5% 24 0.0% 065+ years 20.6% 21 17.9% 5 21.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 46.7% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 INT Do you have access to the internet either at home or at work? Yes both 43.1% 44 53.6% 15 39.2% 29 56.3% 9 58.5% 24 24.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 43.1% 44 0.0% 0at home only 30.4% 31 28.6% 8 31.1% 23 31.3% 5 24.4% 10 35.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30.4% 31 0.0% 0at work only 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0no access to the internet 26.5% 27 17.9% 5 29.7% 22 12.5% 2 17.1% 7 40.0% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 26.5% 27 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 EMP Employment: Which of these activities best describes what you are doing at present? (code one answer only) Employee in full-time job

(30 hours plus) 33.3% 34 42.9% 12 29.7% 22 81.3% 13 39.0% 16 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33.3% 34 0.0% 0

Employee in part-time job (under 30 hours)

20.6% 21 7.1% 2 25.7% 19 6.3% 1 29.3% 12 17.8% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0

Self-employed full or part-time

10.8% 11 28.6% 8 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 14.6% 6 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0

Full-time education at school, college or university

2.0% 2 3.6% 1 1.4% 1 12.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0

On a government supported training scheme

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Unemployed and available for work

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0

Permanently sick / disabled 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0Wholly retired from work 18.6% 19 14.3% 4 20.3% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 42.2% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.6% 19 0.0% 0Looking after the home 12.7% 13 0.0% 0 17.6% 13 0.0% 0 14.6% 6 15.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0Doing something else 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 45: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 86 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

LOC1 Location of workplace: Those who are employed Ashtead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0Cobham 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0Croydon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 54.5% 36 54.5% 12 54.5% 24 57.1% 8 55.9% 19 50.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 54.5% 36 0.0% 0Epsom 3.0% 2 4.5% 1 2.3% 1 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 3.0% 2 9.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0Work at home 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0Kingston 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0London 10.6% 7 13.6% 3 9.1% 4 0.0% 0 14.7% 5 11.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.6% 7 0.0% 0Mole Valley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0Sutton 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tadworth 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0Varies 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 19.7% 13 13.6% 3 22.7% 10 14.3% 2 20.6% 7 22.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 19.7% 13 0.0% 0(Refused) 1.5% 1 4.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0Base: 66 22 44 14 34 18 0 0 0 66 0 LOC2 Is This Within The Centre of Survey Town Those who mentioned a location of workplace Yes 50.8% 33 42.9% 9 54.5% 24 57.1% 8 55.9% 19 35.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 50.8% 33 0.0% 0No 49.2% 32 57.1% 12 45.5% 20 42.9% 6 44.1% 15 64.7% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 49.2% 32 0.0% 0Base: 65 21 44 14 34 17 0 0 0 65 0 ILL Do you have any long standing illness, disability or infirmity that affects your day to day activities? Yes 7.8% 8 7.1% 2 8.1% 6 6.3% 1 7.3% 3 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0No 92.2% 94 92.9% 26 91.9% 68 93.8% 15 92.7% 38 91.1% 41 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 92.2% 94 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 46: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 87 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

ETH Ethnicity: White - British 90.2% 92 92.9% 26 89.2% 66 87.5% 14 95.1% 39 86.7% 39 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 90.2% 92 0.0% 0White - Irish 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0Any other White background 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0White and Black Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and black African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Asian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other mixed background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Indian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pakistani 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bangladeshi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Asian background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Black background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Chinese 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other ethnic group 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 6.9% 7 7.1% 2 6.8% 5 6.3% 1 4.9% 2 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 DAY Day of interview: Monday 24.5% 25 28.6% 8 23.0% 17 12.5% 2 29.3% 12 24.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 0Tuesday 24.5% 25 10.7% 3 29.7% 22 12.5% 2 29.3% 12 24.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 0Wednesday 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Thursday 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friday 23.5% 24 28.6% 8 21.6% 16 25.0% 4 14.6% 6 31.1% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.5% 24 0.0% 0Saturday 27.5% 28 32.1% 9 25.7% 19 50.0% 8 26.8% 11 20.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.5% 28 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 ADU Number of adults (incl. resp.): One 21.6% 22 10.7% 3 25.7% 19 25.0% 4 9.8% 4 31.1% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.6% 22 0.0% 0Two 52.9% 54 64.3% 18 48.6% 36 37.5% 6 53.7% 22 57.8% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 52.9% 54 0.0% 0Three 12.7% 13 7.1% 2 14.9% 11 12.5% 2 17.1% 7 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0Four or more 12.7% 13 17.9% 5 10.8% 8 25.0% 4 19.5% 8 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 47: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 88 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

CHI No. of children 15 years and under: None 77.5% 79 78.6% 22 77.0% 57 75.0% 12 56.1% 23 97.8% 44 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 77.5% 79 0.0% 0One 11.8% 12 7.1% 2 13.5% 10 18.8% 3 19.5% 8 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.8% 12 0.0% 0Two 7.8% 8 10.7% 3 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 19.5% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0Three 2.9% 3 3.6% 1 2.7% 2 6.3% 1 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0Four or more 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 CAR Number of cars in Household: None 9.8% 10 3.6% 1 12.2% 9 18.8% 3 4.9% 2 11.1% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.8% 10 0.0% 0One 33.3% 34 39.3% 11 31.1% 23 50.0% 8 17.1% 7 42.2% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33.3% 34 0.0% 0Two 42.2% 43 50.0% 14 39.2% 29 18.8% 3 56.1% 23 37.8% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 42.2% 43 0.0% 0Three 6.9% 7 3.6% 1 8.1% 6 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0Four or more 7.8% 8 3.6% 1 9.5% 7 12.5% 2 14.6% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0 LOC3 Location of Interview: West Street (Hampshires to

HSBC) 17.6% 18 10.7% 3 20.3% 15 6.3% 1 22.0% 9 17.8% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.6% 18 0.0% 0

South Street (The Boot Hole to Abbey Bank)

20.6% 21 32.1% 9 16.2% 12 31.3% 5 22.0% 9 15.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0

Bottom High Street (Robert Dyas to Steamer Trading)

16.7% 17 10.7% 3 18.9% 14 12.5% 2 14.6% 6 20.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 17 0.0% 0

Middle High Street (Clarks to Monsoon)

20.6% 21 21.4% 6 20.3% 15 31.3% 5 17.1% 7 20.0% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0

Top High Street (Post Office to Halifax)

24.5% 25 25.0% 7 24.3% 18 18.8% 3 24.4% 10 26.7% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 0

Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 48: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 89 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

PC BN5 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Blank 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR5 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR8 5 2.0% 2 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0DD8 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DH5 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU11 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU12 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU2 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU22 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 3 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0GU4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU5 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0GU6 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0IP24 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT10 8 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0KT11 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0KT14 6 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0KT15 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT17 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 7 3.9% 4 3.6% 1 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0KT20 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 49: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 90 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

KT22 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 9 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0KT23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 6 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0KT27 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT4 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT8 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0LU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N19 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N77 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NR32 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NW6 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH1 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH1 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH11 0 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH12 3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH13 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH2 9 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH20 1 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH3 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH3 7 5.9% 6 7.1% 2 5.4% 4 6.3% 1 9.8% 4 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0RH4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 1 17.6% 18 21.4% 6 16.2% 12 25.0% 4 14.6% 6 17.8% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.6% 18 0.0% 0RH4 2 7.8% 8 0.0% 0 10.8% 8 6.3% 1 12.2% 5 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0RH4 3 17.6% 18 25.0% 7 14.9% 11 25.0% 4 17.1% 7 15.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.6% 18 0.0% 0RH4 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH5 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH5 4 9.8% 10 7.1% 2 10.8% 8 12.5% 2 9.8% 4 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.8% 10 0.0% 0RH5 5 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 8.1% 6 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 8.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0RH5 6 5.9% 6 3.6% 1 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0RH6 9 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0RH8 6 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0SM5 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 50: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Dorking Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 91 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

SM7 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SS13 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SU1 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0SW17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 2 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 6.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0SW20 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0T21 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN37 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TQ14 9 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0TW12 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W14 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W2 4 1.0% 1 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0YO26 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 28 74 16 41 45 0 0 0 102 0

Page 51: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 92 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q01 How did you travel to [name of centre] today ? Car driver 50.4% 59 52.3% 23 49.3% 36 33.3% 9 59.6% 28 51.2% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 50.4% 59Car passenger 4.3% 5 6.8% 3 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5Bus 6.0% 7 6.8% 3 5.5% 4 11.1% 3 6.4% 3 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 7Bicycle 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Rail 4.3% 5 4.5% 2 4.1% 3 11.1% 3 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5Taxi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0On foot 31.6% 37 27.3% 12 34.2% 25 37.0% 10 21.3% 10 39.5% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 31.6% 37Other 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 Q02 How long do you intend to stay in [name of centre] today? Less than 30 minutes 14.5% 17 13.6% 6 15.1% 11 22.2% 6 2.1% 1 23.3% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.5% 1730-59 minutes 23.9% 28 25.0% 11 23.3% 17 18.5% 5 19.1% 9 32.6% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.9% 28Between 1 – 2 hours 30.8% 36 31.8% 14 30.1% 22 7.4% 2 42.6% 20 32.6% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30.8% 36Over 2 – 3 hours 16.2% 19 9.1% 4 20.5% 15 33.3% 9 14.9% 7 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.2% 19Over 3 – 4 hours 3.4% 4 9.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Over 4 hours 9.4% 11 11.4% 5 8.2% 6 18.5% 5 10.6% 5 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.4% 11(Don’t know) 1.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 Q03 How often do you visit [name of centre] (including Sunday) ? Everyday 14.5% 17 15.9% 7 13.7% 10 18.5% 5 14.9% 7 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.5% 174 to 6 days a week 12.0% 14 20.5% 9 6.8% 5 22.2% 6 8.5% 4 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.0% 142 to 3 days a week 41.0% 48 29.5% 13 47.9% 35 25.9% 7 31.9% 15 60.5% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 41.0% 481 day a week 12.0% 14 11.4% 5 12.3% 9 18.5% 5 10.6% 5 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.0% 14Once every 2 weeks 8.5% 10 9.1% 4 8.2% 6 0.0% 0 19.1% 9 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.5% 10Once every month 6.8% 8 6.8% 3 6.8% 5 7.4% 2 8.5% 4 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.8% 8Once a quarter 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Less often than once a

quarter 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

First time today 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2(Don’t know / varies) 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 52: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 93 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q04 What is the main reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 29.9% 35 34.1% 15 27.4% 20 29.6% 8 21.3% 10 39.5% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 29.9% 35

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

17.1% 20 11.4% 5 20.5% 15 14.8% 4 19.1% 9 16.3% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.1% 20

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

17.9% 21 13.6% 6 20.5% 15 3.7% 1 19.1% 9 25.6% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.9% 21

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

As a day visitor 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2As a staying visitor 1.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 17.1% 20 27.3% 12 11.0% 8 25.9% 7 21.3% 10 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.1% 20To meet someone 10.3% 12 11.4% 5 9.6% 7 11.1% 3 14.9% 7 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.3% 12Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 3.4% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 4 7.4% 2 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Going for a walk 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 53: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 94 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q05 Is there any other reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 24.8% 29 15.9% 7 30.1% 22 25.9% 7 27.7% 13 20.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.8% 29

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

22.2% 26 27.3% 12 19.2% 14 14.8% 4 19.1% 9 30.2% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22.2% 26

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

9.4% 11 6.8% 3 11.0% 8 11.1% 3 6.4% 3 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.4% 11

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 6.8% 8 9.1% 4 5.5% 4 7.4% 2 6.4% 3 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.8% 8

Work 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1To meet someone 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Browsing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Visit charity shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No other reason/s) 33.3% 39 36.4% 16 31.5% 23 40.7% 11 31.9% 15 30.2% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33.3% 39

Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 54: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 95 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q06 What are the main things that you LIKE about [name of centre] ? Near / convenient 51.3% 60 45.5% 20 54.8% 40 48.1% 13 53.2% 25 51.2% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 51.3% 60Good public transport links 2.6% 3 2.3% 1 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Parking is easy 7.7% 9 9.1% 4 6.8% 5 3.7% 1 14.9% 7 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9Parking is cheap 4.3% 5 6.8% 3 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 8.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5Lack of congestion on roads 2.6% 3 2.3% 1 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Pedestrianised streets 12.8% 15 11.4% 5 13.7% 10 14.8% 4 10.6% 5 14.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.8% 15Little traffic-pedestrian

conflict 3.4% 4 2.3% 1 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 8.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4

Good directional signs to Centre

0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Convenient drop off / pick up stops for buses / good location of bus station

0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Ease of access to all (with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc)

2.6% 3 2.3% 1 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Well signposted route ways / good local maps

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other access / transport factor

0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

General cleanliness of shopping streets

10.3% 12 6.8% 3 12.3% 9 11.1% 3 8.5% 4 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.3% 12

Feels safe / absence of threatening individuals / groups

10.3% 12 11.4% 5 9.6% 7 11.1% 3 10.6% 5 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.3% 12

Presence of police / other security measures

2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Nice street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice busy feel 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Not too crowded 17.9% 21 27.3% 12 12.3% 9 22.2% 6 12.8% 6 20.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.9% 21Character / atmosphere 15.4% 18 13.6% 6 16.4% 12 11.1% 3 19.1% 9 14.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.4% 18Historic buildings / tourist

attractions 7.7% 9 2.3% 1 11.0% 8 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9

Other environmental factor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Selection / choice of

independent / specialist shops

4.3% 5 9.1% 4 1.4% 1 7.4% 2 4.3% 2 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5

Selection / choice of multiple shops (i.e. high street chains such as Boots etc)

2.6% 3 2.3% 1 2.7% 2 0.0% 0 4.3% 2 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Quality of shops 4.3% 5 4.5% 2 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 8.5% 4 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5Specified shops 2.6% 3 4.5% 2 1.4% 1 7.4% 2 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Prices are competitive in

shops compared to other 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Page 55: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 96 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

town/district centres Play area for children 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of places to eat 7.7% 9 6.8% 3 8.2% 6 14.8% 4 6.4% 3 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9Range of pubs / bars 10.3% 12 13.6% 6 8.2% 6 18.5% 5 10.6% 5 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.3% 12Range of services (banks,

insurance, hairdressers, etc)

6.0% 7 6.8% 3 5.5% 4 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 7

Range of leisure facilities 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other points on shops /

attractions 1.7% 2 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

I like everything about [centre]

4.3% 5 0.0% 0 6.8% 5 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5

Community spirit 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friendly 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice village 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is rural 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice place 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The butchers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fresh food shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pet shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Post Office 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is compact 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 6.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3It is quiet 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The market 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1(No opinion) 5.1% 6 9.1% 4 2.7% 2 7.4% 2 2.1% 1 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6(Nothing in particular) 9.4% 11 11.4% 5 8.2% 6 14.8% 4 6.4% 3 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.4% 11Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 56: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 97 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q07 What are the main things you DISLIKE about [name of centre]? Unsafe for pedestrians /

traffic conflict 1.7% 2 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

Not enough pedestrianisation 2.6% 3 4.5% 2 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Difficulties in parking 6.8% 8 11.4% 5 4.1% 3 3.7% 1 10.6% 5 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.8% 8Location of parking 7.7% 9 4.5% 2 9.6% 7 3.7% 1 8.5% 4 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9Parking is expensive 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2Poor public transport links 3.4% 4 2.3% 1 4.1% 3 7.4% 2 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Road congestion 4.3% 5 9.1% 4 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5Poor directional signs to

Centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor signage / routeways within centre / lack of maps of centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inconvenient location of bus stops / bus station

1.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

Difficulties with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other transport / access factor

5.1% 6 4.5% 2 5.5% 4 7.4% 2 2.1% 1 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6

Dirty shopping streets 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Feels unsafe / presence of

threatening individuals / groups

0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Lack of police presence / other security measures

0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Lack of street furniture / floral displays

0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Not busy enough 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Over-crowded 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other environmental factor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0General lack of choice of

multiple shops 23.9% 28 22.7% 10 24.7% 18 25.9% 7 21.3% 10 25.6% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.9% 28

General lack of independent / specialist shops

23.1% 27 22.7% 10 23.3% 17 29.6% 8 14.9% 7 27.9% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.1% 27

Quality of shops is inadequate

1.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

Shops too small 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Lack of a larger supermarket 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Specified shops absent 5.1% 6 0.0% 0 8.2% 6 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6Inadequate range of places to

eat 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Inadequate range of services 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of leisure

facilities 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Absence of play areas for 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 6.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Page 57: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 98 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

children Other 7.7% 9 11.4% 5 5.5% 4 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 14.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9I dislike everything about

[centre] 1.7% 2 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

Poor pavements 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Poor road condition 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Roadworks 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0In-filling 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No character 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Quality of greengrocers

inadequate 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Qualoty of childrens shops inadequate

3.4% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 4 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4

Quality of clothes shops inadequate

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Too many charity shops 2.6% 3 2.3% 1 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3No clothes shops 2.6% 3 4.5% 2 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3No electrical stores 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Need a Marks and Spencers 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Don't want a betting shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too much development 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too many empty shops 1.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2(No opinion) 7.7% 9 9.1% 4 6.8% 5 3.7% 1 8.5% 4 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9(Nothing in particular) 28.2% 33 27.3% 12 28.8% 21 33.3% 9 34.0% 16 18.6% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 28.2% 33

Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 58: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 99 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q08 How could [name of centre] best be improved for shopping? Specified new shop 6.0% 7 6.8% 3 5.5% 4 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 7Better choice of shops in

general 45.3% 53 34.1% 15 52.1% 38 37.0% 10 55.3% 26 39.5% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 45.3% 53

Better quality of shops 23.9% 28 22.7% 10 24.7% 18 22.2% 6 29.8% 14 18.6% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.9% 28More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 5.1% 6 6.8% 3 4.1% 3 3.7% 1 8.5% 4 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6

Less traffic / congestion 3.4% 4 2.3% 1 4.1% 3 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4More shelter from wind /

rain 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1More parking 5.1% 6 13.6% 6 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 8.5% 4 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6Cheaper parking 1.7% 2 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2More accessible car parking 5.1% 6 9.1% 4 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6Better bus services to the

centre 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Improved security measures / policing

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More children’s play areas 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Redevelopments/changes to

site 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Other 4.3% 5 11.4% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 2 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5A butchers 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Clothes shops 3.4% 4 4.5% 2 2.7% 2 7.4% 2 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Childrens shops 1.7% 2 0.0% 0 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2Delicatessen 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Greengrocer 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0An electrical store 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose 3.4% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 4 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Woolworths 4.3% 5 0.0% 0 6.8% 5 0.0% 0 8.5% 4 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5Marks and Spencers 3.4% 4 2.3% 1 4.1% 3 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4A better / bigger supermarket 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A one way system 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Shoe shops 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Less empty shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Independent shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Free parking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 20.5% 24 34.1% 15 12.3% 9 33.3% 9 12.8% 6 20.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.5% 24(None mentioned) 8.5% 10 6.8% 3 9.6% 7 7.4% 2 12.8% 6 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.5% 10

Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 59: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 100 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q09 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Yes 23.1% 27 22.7% 10 23.3% 17 29.6% 8 25.5% 12 16.3% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.1% 27No 56.4% 66 52.3% 23 58.9% 43 55.6% 15 42.6% 20 72.1% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 56.4% 66(Don’t know) 20.5% 24 25.0% 11 17.8% 13 14.8% 4 31.9% 15 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.5% 24

Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 Q10 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Those who said Yes at Q09 Cinema 37.0% 10 40.0% 4 35.3% 6 25.0% 2 50.0% 6 28.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 37.0% 10Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 7.4% 2 10.0% 1 5.9% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.4% 2Health and fitness club 3.7% 1 10.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.7% 1Theatre 18.5% 5 0.0% 0 29.4% 5 0.0% 0 16.7% 2 42.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.5% 5Pubs / bars 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 5.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.7% 1Restaurants / cafes 3.7% 1 10.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.7% 1Nightclubs 7.4% 2 20.0% 2 0.0% 0 25.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.4% 2Other 25.9% 7 30.0% 3 23.5% 4 37.5% 3 25.0% 3 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.9% 7Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A swimming pool 3.7% 1 10.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.7% 1Childrens facilities 18.5% 5 20.0% 2 17.6% 3 37.5% 3 16.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.5% 5Skate park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 27 10 17 8 12 7 0 0 0 0 27 Q11 Where should these leisure facilities be situated? Those who said Yes at Q09 Don't know 55.6% 15 40.0% 4 64.7% 11 50.0% 4 75.0% 9 28.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 55.6% 15Near railway station 14.8% 4 20.0% 2 11.8% 2 12.5% 1 16.7% 2 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.8% 4Other 14.8% 4 20.0% 2 11.8% 2 25.0% 2 8.3% 1 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.8% 4Where the existing one is 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 11.8% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 28.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.4% 2High Street 3.7% 1 10.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.7% 1Town centre 3.7% 1 10.0% 1 0.0% 0 12.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.7% 1Base: 27 10 17 8 12 7 0 0 0 0 27 Q12 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Yes 12.0% 14 11.4% 5 12.3% 9 3.7% 1 17.0% 8 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.0% 14No 64.1% 75 56.8% 25 68.5% 50 70.4% 19 53.2% 25 72.1% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 64.1% 75(Don’t know) 23.9% 28 31.8% 14 19.2% 14 25.9% 7 29.8% 14 16.3% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.9% 28Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 60: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 101 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q13 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Those who said Yes at Q12 Cinema 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 11.1% 1 0.0% 0 12.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.1% 1Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 35.7% 5 20.0% 1 44.4% 4 0.0% 0 12.5% 1 80.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 35.7% 5Restaurants / cafes 28.6% 4 40.0% 2 22.2% 2 0.0% 0 25.0% 2 40.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 28.6% 4Nightclubs 7.1% 1 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.1% 1Other 21.4% 3 20.0% 1 22.2% 2 100.0% 1 25.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.4% 3Nothing 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 11.1% 1 0.0% 0 12.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.1% 1Base: 14 5 9 1 8 5 0 0 0 0 14

Page 61: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 102 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q14 How could [name of centre] be improved to encourage people to spend more leisure time here? Specified new leisure

operator 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

Better choice of leisure destination in general

9.4% 11 4.5% 2 12.3% 9 7.4% 2 17.0% 8 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.4% 11

Better quality of leisure uses 7.7% 9 13.6% 6 4.1% 3 11.1% 3 8.5% 4 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 2.6% 3 6.8% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 2 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Less traffic / congestion 3.4% 4 9.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 2 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4More shelter from wind /

rain 3.4% 4 2.3% 1 4.1% 3 7.4% 2 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4

Improve appearance / environment of centre

2.6% 3 4.5% 2 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Remove litter more often 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1More parking 6.0% 7 13.6% 6 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 10.6% 5 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 7Cheaper parking 6.8% 8 11.4% 5 4.1% 3 7.4% 2 10.6% 5 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.8% 8More accessible car parking 6.0% 7 13.6% 6 1.4% 1 11.1% 3 6.4% 3 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 7Better bus services to the

centre 2.6% 3 6.8% 3 0.0% 0 7.4% 2 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Better late night public transport

3.4% 4 9.1% 4 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4

New / relocated bus stops 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Improved security measures /

policing 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Redevelopments/changes to site

2.6% 3 2.3% 1 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3

Other 3.4% 4 4.5% 2 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4More restaurants 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Swimming pool 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Youth facilities 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Better cinema 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1A nightclub 1.7% 2 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2Parks 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 30.8% 36 27.3% 12 32.9% 24 29.6% 8 25.5% 12 37.2% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30.8% 36(None mentioned) 29.9% 35 15.9% 7 38.4% 28 14.8% 4 31.9% 15 37.2% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 29.9% 35Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 GEN Gender Male 37.6% 44 100.0% 44 0.0% 0 51.9% 14 34.0% 16 32.6% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 37.6% 44Female 62.4% 73 0.0% 0 100.0% 73 48.1% 13 66.0% 31 67.4% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 62.4% 73Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 62: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 103 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

AGE Age 16 – 24 years 9.4% 11 13.6% 6 6.8% 5 40.7% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.4% 1125 – 34 years 13.7% 16 18.2% 8 11.0% 8 59.3% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.7% 1635 – 44 years 18.8% 22 20.5% 9 17.8% 13 0.0% 0 46.8% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.8% 2245 – 54 years 21.4% 25 15.9% 7 24.7% 18 0.0% 0 53.2% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.4% 2555 – 64 years 16.2% 19 11.4% 5 19.2% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 44.2% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.2% 1965+ years 20.5% 24 20.5% 9 20.5% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 55.8% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.5% 24

Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 INT Do you have access to the internet either at home or at work? Yes both 25.6% 30 38.6% 17 17.8% 13 33.3% 9 31.9% 15 14.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.6% 30at home only 38.5% 45 25.0% 11 46.6% 34 48.1% 13 34.0% 16 37.2% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 38.5% 45at work only 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 6.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3no access to the internet 33.3% 39 36.4% 16 31.5% 23 18.5% 5 27.7% 13 48.8% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33.3% 39Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 EMP Employment: Which of these activities best describes what you are doing at present? (code one answer only) Employee in full-time job

(30 hours plus) 32.5% 38 54.5% 24 19.2% 14 29.6% 8 46.8% 22 18.6% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32.5% 38

Employee in part-time job (under 30 hours)

25.6% 30 11.4% 5 34.2% 25 14.8% 4 34.0% 16 23.3% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.6% 30

Self-employed full or part-time

3.4% 4 6.8% 3 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4

Full-time education at school, college or university

5.1% 6 6.8% 3 4.1% 3 22.2% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6

On a government supported training scheme

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Unemployed and available for work

1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2

Permanently sick / disabled 2.6% 3 4.5% 2 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Wholly retired from work 17.9% 21 13.6% 6 20.5% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 48.8% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.9% 21Looking after the home 7.7% 9 0.0% 0 12.3% 9 14.8% 4 4.3% 2 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 9Doing something else 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1(Refused) 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 3.7% 1 4.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 63: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 104 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

LOC1 Location of workplace: Those who are employed Ashtead 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1Bookham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Croydon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Epsom 4.2% 3 3.1% 1 5.0% 2 0.0% 0 5.0% 2 5.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.2% 3Fetcham 2.8% 2 3.1% 1 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.8% 2Guildford 1.4% 1 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1Work at home 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Kingston 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1Leatherhead 25.0% 18 34.4% 11 17.5% 7 53.8% 7 12.5% 5 31.6% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.0% 18London 4.2% 3 9.4% 3 0.0% 0 15.4% 2 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.2% 3Mole Valley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1Tadworth 1.4% 1 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% 1Varies 2.8% 2 3.1% 1 2.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 5.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.8% 2Other 18.1% 13 25.0% 8 12.5% 5 0.0% 0 25.0% 10 15.8% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.1% 13(Refused) 36.1% 26 15.6% 5 52.5% 21 30.8% 4 40.0% 16 31.6% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 36.1% 26Base: 72 32 40 13 40 19 0 0 0 0 72 LOC2 Is This Within The Centre of Survey Town Those who mentioned a location of workplace Yes 34.8% 16 33.3% 9 36.8% 7 66.7% 6 20.8% 5 38.5% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 34.8% 16No 65.2% 30 66.7% 18 63.2% 12 33.3% 3 79.2% 19 61.5% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 65.2% 30Base: 46 27 19 9 24 13 0 0 0 0 46 ILL Do you have any long standing illness, disability or infirmity that affects your day to day activities? Yes 6.0% 7 11.4% 5 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 7No 94.0% 110 88.6% 39 97.3% 71 96.3% 26 93.6% 44 93.0% 40 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 94.0% 110Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 64: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 105 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

ETH Ethnicity: White - British 90.6% 106 88.6% 39 91.8% 67 85.2% 23 87.2% 41 97.7% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 90.6% 106White - Irish 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Any other White background 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2White and Black Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and black African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Asian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other mixed background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Indian 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Pakistani 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bangladeshi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Asian background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Black background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Chinese 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other ethnic group 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 6.0% 7 9.1% 4 4.1% 3 7.4% 2 8.5% 4 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.0% 7Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 DAY Day of interview: Monday 19.7% 23 15.9% 7 21.9% 16 22.2% 6 25.5% 12 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 19.7% 23Tuesday 21.4% 25 29.5% 13 16.4% 12 33.3% 9 25.5% 12 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.4% 25Wednesday 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Thursday 14.5% 17 18.2% 8 12.3% 9 18.5% 5 14.9% 7 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.5% 17Friday 23.1% 27 13.6% 6 28.8% 21 11.1% 3 21.3% 10 32.6% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.1% 27Saturday 21.4% 25 22.7% 10 20.5% 15 14.8% 4 12.8% 6 34.9% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.4% 25Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 ADU Number of adults (incl. resp.): One 22.2% 26 20.5% 9 23.3% 17 11.1% 3 21.3% 10 30.2% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22.2% 26Two 63.2% 74 59.1% 26 65.8% 48 59.3% 16 66.0% 31 62.8% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 63.2% 74Three 11.1% 13 15.9% 7 8.2% 6 18.5% 5 10.6% 5 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.1% 13Four or more 3.4% 4 4.5% 2 2.7% 2 11.1% 3 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 65: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 106 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

CHI No. of children 15 years and under: None 66.7% 78 70.5% 31 64.4% 47 37.0% 10 55.3% 26 97.7% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 66.7% 78One 17.9% 21 13.6% 6 20.5% 15 29.6% 8 25.5% 12 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.9% 21Two 11.1% 13 15.9% 7 8.2% 6 18.5% 5 17.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.1% 13Three 3.4% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 4 11.1% 3 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Four or more 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 CAR Number of cars in Household: None 19.7% 23 18.2% 8 20.5% 15 18.5% 5 17.0% 8 23.3% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 19.7% 23One 35.0% 41 27.3% 12 39.7% 29 22.2% 6 25.5% 12 53.5% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 35.0% 41Two 40.2% 47 47.7% 21 35.6% 26 51.9% 14 51.1% 24 20.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 40.2% 47Three 3.4% 4 4.5% 2 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 6.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4Four or more 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117 LOC3 Location of Interview: Bottom High St / Junction

Church St (around Argos, NatWest, Abbey National)

31.6% 37 29.5% 13 32.9% 24 18.5% 5 46.8% 22 23.3% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 31.6% 37

Swan Centre Square 29.9% 35 34.1% 15 27.4% 20 29.6% 8 21.3% 10 39.5% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 29.9% 35Lidl, Station Rd 20.5% 24 15.9% 7 23.3% 17 18.5% 5 19.1% 9 23.3% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.5% 24Top High Street (around the

Duke’s Head, Wetherspoon)

17.9% 21 20.5% 9 16.4% 12 33.3% 9 12.8% 6 14.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.9% 21

Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 66: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 107 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

PC BN5 9 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1Blank 5.1% 6 2.3% 1 6.8% 5 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 9.3% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.1% 6CR0 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 4 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1CR5 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR8 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DD8 1 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1DH5 4 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1GU11 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU12 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU2 2 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1GU21 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU22 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1GU3 1 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1GU3 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1GU4 7 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1GU5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU6 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0IP24 3 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT1 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT10 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT11 2 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT14 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT15 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT17 3 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT18 6 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT18 7 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT19 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 9 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT2 6 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2KT20 5 1.7% 2 2.3% 1 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2KT20 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 8 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT21 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT21 1 2.6% 3 0.0% 0 4.1% 3 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 3KT21 2 4.3% 5 6.8% 3 2.7% 2 3.7% 1 2.1% 1 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.3% 5KT21 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 3.4% 4 9.1% 4 0.0% 0 11.1% 3 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 4

Page 67: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 108 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

KT22 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 5 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT22 6 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT22 7 14.5% 17 18.2% 8 12.3% 9 18.5% 5 12.8% 6 14.0% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.5% 17KT22 8 12.8% 15 6.8% 3 16.4% 12 7.4% 2 10.6% 5 18.6% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.8% 15KT22 9 14.5% 17 9.1% 4 17.8% 13 11.1% 3 12.8% 6 18.6% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.5% 17KT23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 3 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT23 4 6.8% 8 0.0% 0 11.0% 8 7.4% 2 8.5% 4 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.8% 8KT23 9 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT24 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT27 9 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1KT4 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT8 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0LU4 7 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1N17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N19 5 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1N77 3 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1NR32 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1NW6 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 4 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1RH1 5 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1RH11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH12 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH13 9 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1RH2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH20 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1RH4 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH8 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SM5 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 68: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Leatherhead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 109 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

SM7 2 1.7% 2 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 2SS13 1 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1SU1 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW17 9 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1SW19 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW20 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW7 4 0.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1T21 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN37 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TQ14 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TW12 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W14 8 0.9% 1 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.9% 1W2 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0YO26 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 117 44 73 27 47 43 0 0 0 0 117

Page 69: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 20 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q01 How did you travel to [name of centre] today ? Car driver 63.5% 80 52.6% 20 68.2% 60 38.5% 5 69.1% 38 64.9% 37 63.5% 80 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Car passenger 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 4.5% 4 7.7% 1 3.6% 2 1.8% 1 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bus 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bicycle 3.2% 4 2.6% 1 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 3.5% 2 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Rail 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Taxi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0On foot 29.4% 37 42.1% 16 23.9% 21 53.8% 7 23.6% 13 28.1% 16 29.4% 37 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 Q02 How long do you intend to stay in [name of centre] today? Less than 30 minutes 59.5% 75 65.8% 25 56.8% 50 53.8% 7 56.4% 31 64.9% 37 59.5% 75 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 030-59 minutes 15.1% 19 23.7% 9 11.4% 10 7.7% 1 20.0% 11 12.3% 7 15.1% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Between 1 – 2 hours 15.9% 20 7.9% 3 19.3% 17 15.4% 2 10.9% 6 19.3% 11 15.9% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 2 – 3 hours 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 4.5% 4 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 3.5% 2 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 3 – 4 hours 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 4 hours 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 8.0% 7 15.4% 2 9.1% 5 0.0% 0 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 Q03 How often do you visit [name of centre] (including Sunday) ? Everyday 15.9% 20 13.2% 5 17.0% 15 15.4% 2 21.8% 12 10.5% 6 15.9% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 04 to 6 days a week 16.7% 21 18.4% 7 15.9% 14 15.4% 2 12.7% 7 21.1% 12 16.7% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 02 to 3 days a week 36.5% 46 39.5% 15 35.2% 31 38.5% 5 30.9% 17 40.4% 23 36.5% 46 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 01 day a week 14.3% 18 10.5% 4 15.9% 14 23.1% 3 18.2% 10 8.8% 5 14.3% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once every 2 weeks 5.6% 7 7.9% 3 4.5% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 7.0% 4 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once every month 7.1% 9 7.9% 3 6.8% 6 7.7% 1 9.1% 5 5.3% 3 7.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once a quarter 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Less often than once a

quarter 2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.3% 3 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

First time today 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 70: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 21 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q04 What is the main reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 36.5% 46 34.2% 13 37.5% 33 15.4% 2 38.2% 21 38.6% 22 36.5% 46 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

9.5% 12 10.5% 4 9.1% 8 0.0% 0 7.3% 4 14.0% 8 9.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

22.2% 28 31.6% 12 18.2% 16 30.8% 4 14.5% 8 28.1% 16 22.2% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 4.0% 5 2.6% 1 4.5% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 3.5% 2 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 9.5% 12 5.3% 2 11.4% 10 23.1% 3 16.4% 9 0.0% 0 9.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0To meet someone 5.6% 7 7.9% 3 4.5% 4 15.4% 2 5.5% 3 3.5% 2 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 7.9% 10 2.6% 1 10.2% 9 15.4% 2 5.5% 3 8.8% 5 7.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Going for a walk 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No particular pattern) 2.4% 3 5.3% 2 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 1.8% 1 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 71: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 22 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q05 Is there any other reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 18.3% 23 15.8% 6 19.3% 17 23.1% 3 20.0% 11 15.8% 9 18.3% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

15.1% 19 13.2% 5 15.9% 14 7.7% 1 10.9% 6 19.3% 11 15.1% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

5.6% 7 5.3% 2 5.7% 5 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 7.0% 4 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0To meet someone 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 5.7% 5 7.7% 1 3.6% 2 3.5% 2 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Browsing 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Visit charity shop 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No other reason/s) 51.6% 65 63.2% 24 46.6% 41 61.5% 8 54.5% 30 47.4% 27 51.6% 65 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 72: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 23 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q06 What are the main things that you LIKE about [name of centre] ? Near / convenient 34.1% 43 26.3% 10 37.5% 33 38.5% 5 38.2% 21 29.8% 17 34.1% 43 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Good public transport links 4.0% 5 5.3% 2 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 3.5% 2 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is easy 6.3% 8 0.0% 0 9.1% 8 0.0% 0 12.7% 7 1.8% 1 6.3% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is cheap 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.4% 3 7.7% 1 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of congestion on roads 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pedestrianised streets 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Little traffic-pedestrian

conflict 1.6% 2 2.6% 1 1.1% 1 7.7% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Good directional signs to Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Convenient drop off / pick up stops for buses / good location of bus station

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Ease of access to all (with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Well signposted route ways / good local maps

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other access / transport factor

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

General cleanliness of shopping streets

4.8% 6 7.9% 3 3.4% 3 15.4% 2 5.5% 3 1.8% 1 4.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Feels safe / absence of threatening individuals / groups

5.6% 7 5.3% 2 5.7% 5 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 8.8% 5 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Presence of police / other security measures

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice busy feel 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Not too crowded 15.1% 19 18.4% 7 13.6% 12 46.2% 6 12.7% 7 10.5% 6 15.1% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Character / atmosphere 27.8% 35 31.6% 12 26.1% 23 23.1% 3 32.7% 18 24.6% 14 27.8% 35 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Historic buildings / tourist

attractions 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other environmental factor 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 7.7% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Selection / choice of

independent / specialist shops

30.2% 38 23.7% 9 33.0% 29 15.4% 2 41.8% 23 22.8% 13 30.2% 38 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Selection / choice of multiple shops (i.e. high street chains such as Boots etc)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of shops 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Specified shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Prices are competitive in

shops compared to other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 73: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 24 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

town/district centres Play area for children 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of places to eat 7.1% 9 2.6% 1 9.1% 8 15.4% 2 9.1% 5 3.5% 2 7.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of pubs / bars 5.6% 7 2.6% 1 6.8% 6 15.4% 2 7.3% 4 1.8% 1 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of services (banks,

insurance, hairdressers, etc)

3.2% 4 2.6% 1 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 7.3% 4 0.0% 0 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Range of leisure facilities 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other points on shops /

attractions 2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

I like everything about [centre]

5.6% 7 0.0% 0 8.0% 7 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 8.8% 5 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Community spirit 3.2% 4 2.6% 1 3.4% 3 7.7% 1 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friendly 9.5% 12 13.2% 5 8.0% 7 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 14.0% 8 9.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice village 12.7% 16 15.8% 6 11.4% 10 15.4% 2 12.7% 7 12.3% 7 12.7% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is rural 2.4% 3 5.3% 2 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 1.8% 1 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice place 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The butchers 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fresh food shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pet shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Post Office 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is compact 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is quiet 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The market 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No opinion) 3.2% 4 2.6% 1 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 5.3% 3 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 4.0% 5 7.9% 3 2.3% 2 7.7% 1 3.6% 2 3.5% 2 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 74: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 25 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q07 What are the main things you DISLIKE about [name of centre]? Unsafe for pedestrians /

traffic conflict 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Not enough pedestrianisation 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Difficulties in parking 8.7% 11 7.9% 3 9.1% 8 7.7% 1 14.5% 8 3.5% 2 8.7% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Location of parking 9.5% 12 5.3% 2 11.4% 10 7.7% 1 16.4% 9 3.5% 2 9.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is expensive 5.6% 7 5.3% 2 5.7% 5 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 7.0% 4 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor public transport links 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Road congestion 18.3% 23 13.2% 5 20.5% 18 7.7% 1 18.2% 10 19.3% 11 18.3% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor directional signs to

Centre 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor signage / routeways within centre / lack of maps of centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inconvenient location of bus stops / bus station

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Difficulties with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other transport / access factor

2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Dirty shopping streets 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Feels unsafe / presence of

threatening individuals / groups

4.0% 5 7.9% 3 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 7.3% 4 1.8% 1 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Lack of police presence / other security measures

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Lack of street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Not busy enough 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over-crowded 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other environmental factor 4.0% 5 7.9% 3 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 7.0% 4 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0General lack of choice of

multiple shops 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 0.0% 0 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

General lack of independent / specialist shops

4.8% 6 5.3% 2 4.5% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 5.3% 3 4.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of shops is inadequate

0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Shops too small 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of a larger supermarket 1.6% 2 2.6% 1 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.5% 2 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Specified shops absent 2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.3% 3 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of places to

eat 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inadequate range of services 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of leisure

facilities 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Absence of play areas for 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 75: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 26 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

children Other 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0I dislike everything about

[centre] 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor pavements 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor road condition 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Roadworks 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0In-filling 3.2% 4 2.6% 1 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.0% 4 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No character 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Quality of greengrocers

inadequate 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Qualoty of childrens shops inadequate

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of clothes shops inadequate

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Too many charity shops 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No clothes shops 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 15.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No electrical stores 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Need a Marks and Spencers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Don't want a betting shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too much development 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too many empty shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No opinion) 4.0% 5 7.9% 3 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 3.5% 2 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 42.1% 53 44.7% 17 40.9% 36 53.8% 7 38.2% 21 43.9% 25 42.1% 53 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 76: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 27 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q08 How could [name of centre] best be improved for shopping? Specified new shop 3.2% 4 2.6% 1 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 3.5% 2 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better choice of shops in

general 16.7% 21 13.2% 5 18.2% 16 30.8% 4 21.8% 12 8.8% 5 16.7% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better quality of shops 8.7% 11 7.9% 3 9.1% 8 15.4% 2 9.1% 5 7.0% 4 8.7% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 8.0% 7 7.7% 1 5.5% 3 5.3% 3 5.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.5% 2 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More parking 14.3% 18 7.9% 3 17.0% 15 23.1% 3 18.2% 10 8.8% 5 14.3% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 11.9% 15 10.5% 4 12.5% 11 15.4% 2 7.3% 4 15.8% 9 11.9% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 4.8% 6 0.0% 0 6.8% 6 7.7% 1 3.6% 2 5.3% 3 4.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improved security measures / policing

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More children’s play areas 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redevelopments/changes to

site 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 14.3% 18 21.1% 8 11.4% 10 7.7% 1 16.4% 9 14.0% 8 14.3% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A butchers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Clothes shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Childrens shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Delicatessen 2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 0.0% 0 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Greengrocer 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0An electrical store 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose 4.8% 6 5.3% 2 4.5% 4 7.7% 1 7.3% 4 1.8% 1 4.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woolworths 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks and Spencers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A better / bigger supermarket 3.2% 4 2.6% 1 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 3.5% 2 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A one way system 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Shoe shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Less empty shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Independent shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Free parking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 24.6% 31 31.6% 12 21.6% 19 23.1% 3 23.6% 13 26.3% 15 24.6% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 13.5% 17 15.8% 6 12.5% 11 7.7% 1 9.1% 5 17.5% 10 13.5% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 77: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 28 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q09 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Yes 29.4% 37 26.3% 10 30.7% 27 46.2% 6 36.4% 20 19.3% 11 29.4% 37 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 52.4% 66 55.3% 21 51.1% 45 46.2% 6 43.6% 24 61.4% 35 52.4% 66 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 18.3% 23 18.4% 7 18.2% 16 7.7% 1 20.0% 11 19.3% 11 18.3% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 Q10 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Those who said Yes at Q09 Cinema 10.8% 4 10.0% 1 11.1% 3 16.7% 1 15.0% 3 0.0% 0 10.8% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bingo hall 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 10.8% 4 10.0% 1 11.1% 3 16.7% 1 10.0% 2 9.1% 1 10.8% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 16.2% 6 20.0% 2 14.8% 4 16.7% 1 25.0% 5 0.0% 0 16.2% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nightclubs 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 5.4% 2 10.0% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 10.0% 2 0.0% 0 5.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A swimming pool 8.1% 3 10.0% 1 7.4% 2 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 18.2% 2 8.1% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Childrens facilities 27.0% 10 20.0% 2 29.6% 8 16.7% 1 20.0% 4 45.5% 5 27.0% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Skate park 16.2% 6 20.0% 2 14.8% 4 0.0% 0 20.0% 4 18.2% 2 16.2% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 8.1% 3 10.0% 1 7.4% 2 16.7% 1 5.0% 1 9.1% 1 8.1% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 37 10 27 6 20 11 37 0 0 0 0 Q11 Where should these leisure facilities be situated? Those who said Yes at Q09 Don't know 62.2% 23 40.0% 4 70.4% 19 66.7% 4 60.0% 12 63.6% 7 62.2% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 21.6% 8 40.0% 4 14.8% 4 16.7% 1 25.0% 5 18.2% 2 21.6% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Where the existing one is 5.4% 2 10.0% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 10.0% 2 0.0% 0 5.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Recreation ground 5.4% 2 10.0% 1 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 9.1% 1 5.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0High Street 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Near the park 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 37 10 27 6 20 11 37 0 0 0 0 Q12 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Yes 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 79.4% 100 73.7% 28 81.8% 72 84.6% 11 74.5% 41 82.5% 47 79.4% 100 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 19.8% 25 26.3% 10 17.0% 15 7.7% 1 25.5% 14 17.5% 10 19.8% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 78: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 29 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q13 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Those who said Yes at Q12 Cinema 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nightclubs 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Page 79: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 30 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q14 How could [name of centre] be improved to encourage people to spend more leisure time here? Specified new leisure

operator 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better choice of leisure destination in general

7.9% 10 2.6% 1 10.2% 9 7.7% 1 9.1% 5 7.0% 4 7.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better quality of leisure uses 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 4.5% 4 0.0% 0 7.3% 4 0.0% 0 3.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 1.8% 1 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More parking 10.3% 13 7.9% 3 11.4% 10 7.7% 1 16.4% 9 5.3% 3 10.3% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 5.7% 5 15.4% 2 3.6% 2 1.8% 1 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 7.7% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better late night public transport

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Improved security measures /

policing 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Redevelopments/changes to site

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 4.0% 5 2.6% 1 4.5% 4 7.7% 1 5.5% 3 1.8% 1 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More restaurants 4.0% 5 5.3% 2 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 3.5% 2 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Swimming pool 1.6% 2 2.6% 1 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Youth facilities 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better cinema 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A nightclub 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parks 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 42.1% 53 47.4% 18 39.8% 35 38.5% 5 40.0% 22 45.6% 26 42.1% 53 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 27.0% 34 28.9% 11 26.1% 23 15.4% 2 23.6% 13 31.6% 18 27.0% 34 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 GEN Gender Male 30.2% 38 100.0% 38 0.0% 0 23.1% 3 23.6% 13 38.6% 22 30.2% 38 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Female 69.8% 88 0.0% 0 100.0% 88 76.9% 10 76.4% 42 61.4% 35 69.8% 88 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 80: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 31 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

AGE Age 16 – 24 years 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 15.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 025 – 34 years 8.7% 11 7.9% 3 9.1% 8 84.6% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.7% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 035 – 44 years 21.4% 27 18.4% 7 22.7% 20 0.0% 0 49.1% 27 0.0% 0 21.4% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 045 – 54 years 22.2% 28 15.8% 6 25.0% 22 0.0% 0 50.9% 28 0.0% 0 22.2% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 055 – 64 years 17.5% 22 21.1% 8 15.9% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 38.6% 22 17.5% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 065+ years 27.8% 35 36.8% 14 23.9% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 61.4% 35 27.8% 35 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 INT Do you have access to the internet either at home or at work? Yes both 23.8% 30 28.9% 11 21.6% 19 38.5% 5 43.6% 24 1.8% 1 23.8% 30 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0at home only 38.9% 49 34.2% 13 40.9% 36 46.2% 6 38.2% 21 36.8% 21 38.9% 49 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0at work only 1.6% 2 2.6% 1 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0no access to the internet 35.7% 45 34.2% 13 36.4% 32 15.4% 2 16.4% 9 59.6% 34 35.7% 45 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 EMP Employment: Which of these activities best describes what you are doing at present? (code one answer only) Employee in full-time job

(30 hours plus) 27.0% 34 39.5% 15 21.6% 19 53.8% 7 45.5% 25 3.5% 2 27.0% 34 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Employee in part-time job (under 30 hours)

19.0% 24 2.6% 1 26.1% 23 30.8% 4 32.7% 18 3.5% 2 19.0% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Self-employed full or part-time

0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Full-time education at school, college or university

0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

On a government supported training scheme

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Unemployed and available for work

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Permanently sick / disabled 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wholly retired from work 34.1% 43 44.7% 17 29.5% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 73.7% 42 34.1% 43 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Looking after the home 12.7% 16 5.3% 2 15.9% 14 7.7% 1 14.5% 8 12.3% 7 12.7% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Doing something else 1.6% 2 2.6% 1 1.1% 1 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 4.0% 5 2.6% 1 4.5% 4 0.0% 0 5.5% 3 3.5% 2 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 81: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 32 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

LOC1 Location of workplace: Those who are employed Ashtead 20.3% 12 0.0% 0 28.6% 12 18.2% 2 23.3% 10 0.0% 0 20.3% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Croydon 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 1.7% 1 5.9% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Epsom 8.5% 5 5.9% 1 9.5% 4 0.0% 0 9.3% 4 20.0% 1 8.5% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 4.8% 2 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Work at home 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Kingston 1.7% 1 5.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 6.8% 4 0.0% 0 9.5% 4 9.1% 1 7.0% 3 0.0% 0 6.8% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0London 22.0% 13 47.1% 8 11.9% 5 9.1% 1 25.6% 11 20.0% 1 22.0% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Mole Valley 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton 5.1% 3 5.9% 1 4.8% 2 9.1% 1 4.7% 2 0.0% 0 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tadworth 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Varies 1.7% 1 5.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.0% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 16.9% 10 23.5% 4 14.3% 6 18.2% 2 16.3% 7 20.0% 1 16.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 14.3% 6 9.1% 1 9.3% 4 20.0% 1 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 59 17 42 11 43 5 59 0 0 0 0 LOC2 Is This Within The Centre of Survey Town Those who mentioned a location of workplace Yes 20.8% 11 0.0% 0 30.6% 11 20.0% 2 23.1% 9 0.0% 0 20.8% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 79.2% 42 100.0% 17 69.4% 25 80.0% 8 76.9% 30 100.0% 4 79.2% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 53 17 36 10 39 4 53 0 0 0 0 ILL Do you have any long standing illness, disability or infirmity that affects your day to day activities? Yes 7.1% 9 5.3% 2 8.0% 7 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 12.3% 7 7.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 92.9% 117 94.7% 36 92.0% 81 100.0% 13 96.4% 53 87.7% 50 92.9% 117 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 82: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 33 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

ETH Ethnicity: White - British 94.4% 119 94.7% 36 94.3% 83 84.6% 11 90.9% 50 100.0% 57 94.4% 119 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White - Irish 2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 7.7% 1 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other White background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Black Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and black African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Asian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other mixed background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Indian 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pakistani 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bangladeshi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Asian background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Caribbean 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Black background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Chinese 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other ethnic group 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 1.6% 2 2.6% 1 1.1% 1 7.7% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 DAY Day of interview: Monday 19.8% 25 28.9% 11 15.9% 14 38.5% 5 21.8% 12 14.0% 8 19.8% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tuesday 21.4% 27 15.8% 6 23.9% 21 23.1% 3 27.3% 15 15.8% 9 21.4% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wednesday 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Thursday 19.0% 24 18.4% 7 19.3% 17 7.7% 1 23.6% 13 17.5% 10 19.0% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friday 19.8% 25 18.4% 7 20.5% 18 7.7% 1 10.9% 6 31.6% 18 19.8% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Saturday 19.8% 25 18.4% 7 20.5% 18 23.1% 3 16.4% 9 21.1% 12 19.8% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 ADU Number of adults (incl. resp.): One 17.5% 22 13.2% 5 19.3% 17 15.4% 2 9.1% 5 26.3% 15 17.5% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 61.1% 77 68.4% 26 58.0% 51 46.2% 6 61.8% 34 63.2% 36 61.1% 77 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 11.1% 14 10.5% 4 11.4% 10 7.7% 1 18.2% 10 5.3% 3 11.1% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 10.3% 13 7.9% 3 11.4% 10 30.8% 4 10.9% 6 5.3% 3 10.3% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 83: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 34 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

CHI No. of children 15 years and under: None 74.6% 94 76.3% 29 73.9% 65 76.9% 10 49.1% 27 98.2% 56 74.6% 94 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0One 13.5% 17 15.8% 6 12.5% 11 23.1% 3 23.6% 13 1.8% 1 13.5% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 7.1% 9 7.9% 3 6.8% 6 0.0% 0 16.4% 9 0.0% 0 7.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 5.7% 5 0.0% 0 9.1% 5 0.0% 0 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 CAR Number of cars in Household: None 9.5% 12 15.8% 6 6.8% 6 23.1% 3 0.0% 0 15.8% 9 9.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0One 37.3% 47 31.6% 12 39.8% 35 7.7% 1 29.1% 16 50.9% 29 37.3% 47 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 39.7% 50 42.1% 16 38.6% 34 46.2% 6 52.7% 29 26.3% 15 39.7% 50 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 8.7% 11 7.9% 3 9.1% 8 0.0% 0 12.7% 7 7.0% 4 8.7% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 4.8% 6 2.6% 1 5.7% 5 23.1% 3 5.5% 3 0.0% 0 4.8% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0 LOC3 Location of Interview: Craddocks Parade 51.6% 65 55.3% 21 50.0% 44 53.8% 7 58.2% 32 43.9% 25 51.6% 65 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The Street (around 35-37 and

66-84) 48.4% 61 44.7% 17 50.0% 44 46.2% 6 41.8% 23 56.1% 32 48.4% 61 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 84: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 35 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

PC BN5 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Blank 4.0% 5 5.3% 2 3.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 5 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 1 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 4 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR5 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR6 9 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR8 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DD8 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DH5 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU11 3 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU12 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU2 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU22 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU6 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0IP24 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT10 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT11 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT14 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT15 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT17 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 6 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 7 2.4% 3 2.6% 1 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.3% 3 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 8 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 5 1.6% 2 2.6% 1 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 7 2.4% 3 5.3% 2 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 3.5% 2 2.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 6.3% 8 7.9% 3 5.7% 5 23.1% 3 3.6% 2 5.3% 3 6.3% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 1 31.7% 40 34.2% 13 30.7% 27 30.8% 4 38.2% 21 26.3% 15 31.7% 40 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 2 27.0% 34 23.7% 9 28.4% 25 23.1% 3 16.4% 9 36.8% 21 27.0% 34 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 3 1.6% 2 5.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 6 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 85: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 36 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

KT22 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 7 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 8 4.0% 5 2.6% 1 4.5% 4 0.0% 0 7.3% 4 1.8% 1 4.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 9 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 4 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 5 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT27 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT4 8 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT8 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0LU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N19 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N77 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NR32 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NW6 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH12 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH13 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH20 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 2 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.5% 2 1.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 4 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH8 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SM5 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 86: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Ashtead Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 37 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

SM7 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SS13 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SU1 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 1 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 7.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW20 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0T21 1 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN37 7 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN7 4 0.8% 1 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TQ14 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TW12 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W14 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W2 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0YO26 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 126 38 88 13 55 57 126 0 0 0 0

Page 87: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 38 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q01 How did you travel to [name of centre] today ? Car driver 71.3% 72 78.6% 33 66.1% 39 28.6% 2 82.9% 34 67.3% 35 0.0% 0 71.3% 72 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Car passenger 3.0% 3 4.8% 2 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bus 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Motorcycle 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Rail 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Taxi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0On foot 24.8% 25 14.3% 6 32.2% 19 57.1% 4 12.2% 5 30.8% 16 0.0% 0 24.8% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 Q02 How long do you intend to stay in [name of centre] today? Less than 30 minutes 84.2% 85 88.1% 37 81.4% 48 57.1% 4 85.4% 35 88.5% 46 0.0% 0 84.2% 85 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 030-59 minutes 8.9% 9 4.8% 2 11.9% 7 28.6% 2 7.3% 3 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 8.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Between 1 – 2 hours 4.0% 4 2.4% 1 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 2 – 3 hours 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 3 – 4 hours 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 4 hours 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 Q03 How often do you visit [name of centre] (including Sunday) ? Everyday 14.9% 15 16.7% 7 13.6% 8 0.0% 0 9.8% 4 21.2% 11 0.0% 0 14.9% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 04 to 6 days a week 16.8% 17 16.7% 7 16.9% 10 14.3% 1 12.2% 5 21.2% 11 0.0% 0 16.8% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 02 to 3 days a week 35.6% 36 40.5% 17 32.2% 19 57.1% 4 34.1% 14 34.6% 18 0.0% 0 35.6% 36 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 01 day a week 16.8% 17 16.7% 7 16.9% 10 14.3% 1 22.0% 9 13.5% 7 0.0% 0 16.8% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once every 2 weeks 5.0% 5 2.4% 1 6.8% 4 14.3% 1 7.3% 3 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once every month 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 12.2% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once a quarter 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Less often than once a

quarter 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

First time today 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know / varies) 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 88: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 39 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q04 What is the main reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 52.5% 53 45.2% 19 57.6% 34 28.6% 2 51.2% 21 57.7% 30 0.0% 0 52.5% 53 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

19.8% 20 23.8% 10 16.9% 10 14.3% 1 24.4% 10 17.3% 9 0.0% 0 19.8% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

12.9% 13 14.3% 6 11.9% 7 14.3% 1 14.6% 6 11.5% 6 0.0% 0 12.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 2.0% 2 4.8% 2 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 5.9% 6 7.1% 3 5.1% 3 28.6% 2 2.4% 1 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0To meet someone 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 4.0% 4 2.4% 1 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Going for a walk 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 89: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 40 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q05 Is there any other reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 13.9% 14 4.8% 2 20.3% 12 14.3% 1 7.3% 3 19.2% 10 0.0% 0 13.9% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

18.8% 19 19.0% 8 18.6% 11 0.0% 0 17.1% 7 23.1% 12 0.0% 0 18.8% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

9.9% 10 9.5% 4 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 12.2% 5 9.6% 5 0.0% 0 9.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0To meet someone 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 5.0% 5 4.8% 2 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Browsing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Visit charity shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No other reason/s) 50.5% 51 59.5% 25 44.1% 26 71.4% 5 58.5% 24 40.4% 21 0.0% 0 50.5% 51 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 90: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 41 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q06 What are the main things that you LIKE about [name of centre] ? Near / convenient 40.6% 41 45.2% 19 37.3% 22 42.9% 3 41.5% 17 40.4% 21 0.0% 0 40.6% 41 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Good public transport links 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is easy 35.6% 36 45.2% 19 28.8% 17 14.3% 1 39.0% 16 34.6% 18 0.0% 0 35.6% 36 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is cheap 12.9% 13 14.3% 6 11.9% 7 0.0% 0 17.1% 7 9.6% 5 0.0% 0 12.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of congestion on roads 3.0% 3 2.4% 1 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pedestrianised streets 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Little traffic-pedestrian

conflict 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Good directional signs to Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Convenient drop off / pick up stops for buses / good location of bus station

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Ease of access to all (with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Well signposted route ways / good local maps

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other access / transport factor

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

General cleanliness of shopping streets

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Feels safe / absence of threatening individuals / groups

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Presence of police / other security measures

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice street furniture / floral displays

1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice busy feel 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Not too crowded 12.9% 13 7.1% 3 16.9% 10 0.0% 0 22.0% 9 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 12.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Character / atmosphere 23.8% 24 16.7% 7 28.8% 17 28.6% 2 26.8% 11 19.2% 10 0.0% 0 23.8% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Historic buildings / tourist

attractions 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other environmental factor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Selection / choice of

independent / specialist shops

28.7% 29 31.0% 13 27.1% 16 28.6% 2 26.8% 11 30.8% 16 0.0% 0 28.7% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Selection / choice of multiple shops (i.e. high street chains such as Boots etc)

2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of shops 6.9% 7 7.1% 3 6.8% 4 14.3% 1 7.3% 3 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Specified shops 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Prices are competitive in

shops compared to other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 91: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 42 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

town/district centres Play area for children 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of places to eat 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of pubs / bars 2.0% 2 4.8% 2 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of services (banks,

insurance, hairdressers, etc)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Range of leisure facilities 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other points on shops /

attractions 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

I like everything about [centre]

1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Community spirit 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friendly 9.9% 10 9.5% 4 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 15.4% 8 0.0% 0 9.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice village 5.0% 5 4.8% 2 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is rural 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice place 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 5.1% 3 14.3% 1 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The butchers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fresh food shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pet shop 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Post Office 3.0% 3 2.4% 1 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is compact 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is quiet 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The market 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No opinion) 5.9% 6 7.1% 3 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 4.0% 4 4.8% 2 3.4% 2 14.3% 1 2.4% 1 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 92: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 43 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q07 What are the main things you DISLIKE about [name of centre]? Unsafe for pedestrians /

traffic conflict 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Not enough pedestrianisation 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Difficulties in parking 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 12.2% 5 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Location of parking 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is expensive 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor public transport links 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Road congestion 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor directional signs to

Centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor signage / routeways within centre / lack of maps of centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inconvenient location of bus stops / bus station

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Difficulties with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other transport / access factor

3.0% 3 4.8% 2 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Dirty shopping streets 2.0% 2 4.8% 2 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Feels unsafe / presence of

threatening individuals / groups

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Lack of police presence / other security measures

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Lack of street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Not busy enough 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over-crowded 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other environmental factor 5.0% 5 7.1% 3 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0General lack of choice of

multiple shops 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 11.9% 7 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

General lack of independent / specialist shops

3.0% 3 0.0% 0 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of shops is inadequate

2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 14.3% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Shops too small 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of a larger supermarket 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Specified shops absent 2.0% 2 4.8% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of places to

eat 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 14.3% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inadequate range of services 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of leisure

facilities 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Absence of play areas for 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 93: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 44 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

children Other 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0I dislike everything about

[centre] 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor pavements 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor road condition 6.9% 7 4.8% 2 8.5% 5 28.6% 2 7.3% 3 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Roadworks 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0In-filling 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No character 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Quality of greengrocers

inadequate 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Qualoty of childrens shops inadequate

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of clothes shops inadequate

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Too many charity shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No clothes shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No electrical stores 6.9% 7 4.8% 2 8.5% 5 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Need a Marks and Spencers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Don't want a betting shop 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 6.8% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too much development 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too many empty shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No opinion) 5.0% 5 7.1% 3 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 51.5% 52 57.1% 24 47.5% 28 42.9% 3 56.1% 23 48.1% 25 0.0% 0 51.5% 52 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 94: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 45 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q08 How could [name of centre] best be improved for shopping? Specified new shop 5.9% 6 4.8% 2 6.8% 4 14.3% 1 12.2% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better choice of shops in

general 7.9% 8 4.8% 2 10.2% 6 14.3% 1 7.3% 3 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 7.9% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better quality of shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 3.0% 3 4.8% 2 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

5.9% 6 9.5% 4 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More parking 4.0% 4 2.4% 1 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improved security measures / policing

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More children’s play areas 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redevelopments/changes to

site 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 8.9% 9 14.3% 6 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 11.5% 6 0.0% 0 8.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A butchers 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 11.9% 7 14.3% 1 4.9% 2 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Clothes shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Childrens shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Delicatessen 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Greengrocer 8.9% 9 2.4% 1 13.6% 8 0.0% 0 9.8% 4 9.6% 5 0.0% 0 8.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0An electrical store 5.9% 6 4.8% 2 6.8% 4 0.0% 0 9.8% 4 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woolworths 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks and Spencers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A better / bigger supermarket 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A one way system 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Shoe shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Less empty shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Independent shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Free parking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 19.8% 20 23.8% 10 16.9% 10 14.3% 1 17.1% 7 21.2% 11 0.0% 0 19.8% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 31.7% 32 38.1% 16 27.1% 16 28.6% 2 29.3% 12 34.6% 18 0.0% 0 31.7% 32 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 95: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 46 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q09 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Yes 17.8% 18 16.7% 7 18.6% 11 14.3% 1 14.6% 6 21.2% 11 0.0% 0 17.8% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 67.3% 68 76.2% 32 61.0% 36 71.4% 5 63.4% 26 69.2% 36 0.0% 0 67.3% 68 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 14.9% 15 7.1% 3 20.3% 12 14.3% 1 22.0% 9 9.6% 5 0.0% 0 14.9% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 Q10 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Those who said Yes at Q09 Cinema 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 11.1% 2 14.3% 1 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 11.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 16.7% 3 28.6% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 16.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 16.7% 3 14.3% 1 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 50.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nightclubs 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 22.2% 4 28.6% 2 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 36.4% 4 0.0% 0 22.2% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A swimming pool 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Childrens facilities 33.3% 6 28.6% 2 36.4% 4 100.0% 1 33.3% 2 27.3% 3 0.0% 0 33.3% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Skate park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 11.1% 2 14.3% 1 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 11.1% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 18 7 11 1 6 11 0 18 0 0 0 Q11 Where should these leisure facilities be situated? Those who said Yes at Q09 Other 38.9% 7 28.6% 2 45.5% 5 100.0% 1 50.0% 3 27.3% 3 0.0% 0 38.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Don't know 27.8% 5 28.6% 2 27.3% 3 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 36.4% 4 0.0% 0 27.8% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Near the centre 16.7% 3 28.6% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 33.3% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0High Street 5.6% 1 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Near the park 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Recreation ground 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 5.6% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 18 7 11 1 6 11 0 18 0 0 0 Q12 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Yes 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 83.2% 84 83.3% 35 83.1% 49 71.4% 5 82.9% 34 86.5% 45 0.0% 0 83.2% 84 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 15.8% 16 14.3% 6 16.9% 10 14.3% 1 17.1% 7 13.5% 7 0.0% 0 15.8% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 96: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 47 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q13 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Those who said Yes at Q12 Cinema 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nightclubs 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Page 97: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 48 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q14 How could [name of centre] be improved to encourage people to spend more leisure time here? Specified new leisure

operator 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better choice of leisure destination in general

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better quality of leisure uses 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More parking 3.0% 3 2.4% 1 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better late night public transport

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Improved security measures /

policing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Redevelopments/changes to site

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 5.0% 5 4.8% 2 5.1% 3 14.3% 1 2.4% 1 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More restaurants 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Swimming pool 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Youth facilities 4.0% 4 2.4% 1 5.1% 3 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better cinema 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A nightclub 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parks 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 33.7% 34 33.3% 14 33.9% 20 28.6% 2 36.6% 15 32.7% 17 0.0% 0 33.7% 34 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 48.5% 49 50.0% 21 47.5% 28 57.1% 4 41.5% 17 51.9% 27 0.0% 0 48.5% 49 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 GEN Gender Male 41.6% 42 100.0% 42 0.0% 0 57.1% 4 29.3% 12 50.0% 26 0.0% 0 41.6% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Female 58.4% 59 0.0% 0 100.0% 59 42.9% 3 70.7% 29 50.0% 26 0.0% 0 58.4% 59 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 98: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 49 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

AGE Age 16 – 24 years 3.0% 3 4.8% 2 1.7% 1 42.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 025 – 34 years 4.0% 4 4.8% 2 3.4% 2 57.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 035 – 44 years 17.8% 18 19.0% 8 16.9% 10 0.0% 0 43.9% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.8% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 045 – 54 years 22.8% 23 9.5% 4 32.2% 19 0.0% 0 56.1% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22.8% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 055 – 64 years 18.8% 19 21.4% 9 16.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 36.5% 19 0.0% 0 18.8% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 065+ years 32.7% 33 40.5% 17 27.1% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 63.5% 33 0.0% 0 32.7% 33 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 INT Do you have access to the internet either at home or at work? Yes both 26.7% 27 28.6% 12 25.4% 15 42.9% 3 39.0% 16 13.5% 7 0.0% 0 26.7% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0at home only 47.5% 48 47.6% 20 47.5% 28 57.1% 4 43.9% 18 50.0% 26 0.0% 0 47.5% 48 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0at work only 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0no access to the internet 23.8% 24 21.4% 9 25.4% 15 0.0% 0 12.2% 5 36.5% 19 0.0% 0 23.8% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 EMP Employment: Which of these activities best describes what you are doing at present? (code one answer only) Employee in full-time job

(30 hours plus) 29.7% 30 45.2% 19 18.6% 11 71.4% 5 39.0% 16 15.4% 8 0.0% 0 29.7% 30 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Employee in part-time job (under 30 hours)

21.8% 22 2.4% 1 35.6% 21 14.3% 1 36.6% 15 11.5% 6 0.0% 0 21.8% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Self-employed full or part-time

1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Full-time education at school, college or university

1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

On a government supported training scheme

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Unemployed and available for work

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Permanently sick / disabled 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wholly retired from work 34.7% 35 45.2% 19 27.1% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 67.3% 35 0.0% 0 34.7% 35 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Looking after the home 9.9% 10 0.0% 0 16.9% 10 0.0% 0 17.1% 7 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 9.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Doing something else 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 99: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 50 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

LOC1 Location of workplace: Those who are employed Ashtead 1.9% 1 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 7.5% 4 9.5% 2 6.3% 2 16.7% 1 6.3% 2 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 7.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Croydon 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 3.8% 2 4.8% 1 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 6.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Epsom 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 24.5% 13 14.3% 3 31.3% 10 33.3% 2 18.8% 6 35.7% 5 0.0% 0 24.5% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 1.9% 1 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Work at home 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Kingston 1.9% 1 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 13.2% 7 4.8% 1 18.8% 6 0.0% 0 12.5% 4 21.4% 3 0.0% 0 13.2% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0London 7.5% 4 9.5% 2 6.3% 2 16.7% 1 3.1% 1 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 7.5% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Mole Valley 3.8% 2 4.8% 1 3.1% 1 0.0% 0 6.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tadworth 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Varies 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 24.5% 13 28.6% 6 21.9% 7 16.7% 1 28.1% 9 21.4% 3 0.0% 0 24.5% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 3.8% 2 9.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 53 21 32 6 32 14 0 53 0 0 0 LOC2 Is This Within The Centre of Survey Town Those who mentioned a location of workplace Yes 27.5% 14 15.8% 3 34.4% 11 33.3% 2 22.6% 7 38.5% 5 0.0% 0 27.5% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 72.5% 37 84.2% 16 65.6% 21 66.7% 4 77.4% 24 61.5% 8 0.0% 0 72.5% 37 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 51 19 32 6 31 13 0 51 0 0 0 ILL Do you have any long standing illness, disability or infirmity that affects your day to day activities? Yes 12.9% 13 19.0% 8 8.5% 5 0.0% 0 7.3% 3 19.2% 10 0.0% 0 12.9% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 87.1% 88 81.0% 34 91.5% 54 100.0% 7 92.7% 38 80.8% 42 0.0% 0 87.1% 88 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 100: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 51 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

ETH Ethnicity: White - British 97.0% 98 97.6% 41 96.6% 57 85.7% 6 97.6% 40 100.0% 52 0.0% 0 97.0% 98 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White - Irish 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other White background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Black Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and black African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Asian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other mixed background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Indian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pakistani 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bangladeshi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Asian background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Black background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Chinese 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other ethnic group 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 DAY Day of interview: Monday 24.8% 25 28.6% 12 22.0% 13 14.3% 1 29.3% 12 21.2% 11 0.0% 0 24.8% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tuesday 23.8% 24 16.7% 7 28.8% 17 14.3% 1 19.5% 8 28.8% 15 0.0% 0 23.8% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wednesday 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Thursday 24.8% 25 23.8% 10 25.4% 15 14.3% 1 14.6% 6 34.6% 18 0.0% 0 24.8% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friday 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Saturday 25.7% 26 31.0% 13 22.0% 13 57.1% 4 34.1% 14 15.4% 8 0.0% 0 25.7% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 ADU Number of adults (incl. resp.): One 21.8% 22 16.7% 7 25.4% 15 14.3% 1 9.8% 4 30.8% 16 0.0% 0 21.8% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 60.4% 61 61.9% 26 59.3% 35 42.9% 3 65.9% 27 59.6% 31 0.0% 0 60.4% 61 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 13.9% 14 14.3% 6 13.6% 8 42.9% 3 19.5% 8 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 13.9% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 4.0% 4 7.1% 3 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 4.9% 2 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 4.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 101: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 52 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

CHI No. of children 15 years and under: None 67.3% 68 78.6% 33 59.3% 35 71.4% 5 29.3% 12 98.1% 51 0.0% 0 67.3% 68 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0One 15.8% 16 16.7% 7 15.3% 9 14.3% 1 34.1% 14 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 15.8% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 15.8% 16 4.8% 2 23.7% 14 14.3% 1 34.1% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.8% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 CAR Number of cars in Household: None 8.9% 9 4.8% 2 11.9% 7 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 13.5% 7 0.0% 0 8.9% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0One 33.7% 34 38.1% 16 30.5% 18 42.9% 3 17.1% 7 46.2% 24 0.0% 0 33.7% 34 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 47.5% 48 50.0% 21 45.8% 27 57.1% 4 68.3% 28 30.8% 16 0.0% 0 47.5% 48 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 9.9% 10 7.1% 3 11.9% 7 0.0% 0 12.2% 5 9.6% 5 0.0% 0 9.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0 LOC3 Location of Interview: The Street 50.5% 51 54.8% 23 47.5% 28 57.1% 4 48.8% 20 50.0% 26 0.0% 0 50.5% 51 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 02. Cobham Rd 49.5% 50 45.2% 19 52.5% 31 42.9% 3 51.2% 21 50.0% 26 0.0% 0 49.5% 50 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 102: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 53 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

PC BN5 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Blank 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR5 1 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR8 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DD8 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DH5 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU11 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU12 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU2 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU22 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU6 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0IP24 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT10 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT11 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT14 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT15 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT17 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 9 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 2 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 2.0% 2 2.4% 1 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 103: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 54 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

KT22 0 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 7 5.9% 6 7.1% 3 5.1% 3 14.3% 1 4.9% 2 5.8% 3 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 8 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 9 65.3% 66 64.3% 27 66.1% 39 57.1% 4 61.0% 25 71.2% 37 0.0% 0 65.3% 66 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 3 7.9% 8 9.5% 4 6.8% 4 14.3% 1 7.3% 3 7.7% 4 0.0% 0 7.9% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 4 5.0% 5 4.8% 2 5.1% 3 14.3% 1 4.9% 2 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 5.0% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 6 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT27 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT4 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT8 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0LU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N17 9 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N19 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N77 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NR32 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NW6 4 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH12 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH13 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH20 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH8 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SM5 2 1.0% 1 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 104: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Fetcham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 55 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

SM7 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SS13 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SU1 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW20 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0T21 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN37 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TQ14 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TW12 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W14 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W2 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0YO26 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 101 42 59 7 41 52 0 101 0 0 0

Page 105: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 56 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q01 How did you travel to [name of centre] today ? Car driver 57.8% 59 58.3% 21 57.6% 38 54.5% 6 68.6% 24 51.8% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 57.8% 59 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Car passenger 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bus 2.9% 3 2.8% 1 3.0% 2 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bicycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Motorcycle 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Rail 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Taxi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0On foot 38.2% 39 38.9% 14 37.9% 25 27.3% 3 28.6% 10 46.4% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 38.2% 39 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 Q02 How long do you intend to stay in [name of centre] today? Less than 30 minutes 45.1% 46 47.2% 17 43.9% 29 27.3% 3 45.7% 16 48.2% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 45.1% 46 0.0% 0 0.0% 030-59 minutes 20.6% 21 16.7% 6 22.7% 15 18.2% 2 22.9% 8 19.6% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Between 1 – 2 hours 22.5% 23 16.7% 6 25.8% 17 27.3% 3 25.7% 9 19.6% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22.5% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 2 – 3 hours 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 3 – 4 hours 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over 4 hours 6.9% 7 8.3% 3 6.1% 4 27.3% 3 5.7% 2 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 Q03 How often do you visit [name of centre] (including Sunday) ? Everyday 24.5% 25 27.8% 10 22.7% 15 45.5% 5 17.1% 6 25.0% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 04 to 6 days a week 20.6% 21 22.2% 8 19.7% 13 0.0% 0 11.4% 4 30.4% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 02 to 3 days a week 29.4% 30 27.8% 10 30.3% 20 18.2% 2 40.0% 14 25.0% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 29.4% 30 0.0% 0 0.0% 01 day a week 10.8% 11 8.3% 3 12.1% 8 27.3% 3 11.4% 4 7.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once every 2 weeks 3.9% 4 2.8% 1 4.5% 3 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once every month 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Once a quarter 2.9% 3 2.8% 1 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Less often than once a

quarter 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

First time today 2.0% 2 5.6% 2 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 106: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 57 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q04 What is the main reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 56.9% 58 58.3% 21 56.1% 37 54.5% 6 60.0% 21 55.4% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 56.9% 58 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

8.8% 9 5.6% 2 10.6% 7 9.1% 1 8.6% 3 8.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

4.9% 5 2.8% 1 6.1% 4 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 6.9% 7 8.3% 3 6.1% 4 18.2% 2 5.7% 2 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0To meet someone 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 8.8% 9 8.3% 3 9.1% 6 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Going for a walk 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No particular pattern) 6.9% 7 5.6% 2 7.6% 5 9.1% 1 8.6% 3 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 107: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 58 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q05 Is there any other reason for your visit here today? To buy food items (not take-

away / café / restaurant) 13.7% 14 8.3% 3 16.7% 11 18.2% 2 8.6% 3 16.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.7% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To buy non-food goods (e.g. shoes, clothes, jewellery)

12.7% 13 5.6% 2 16.7% 11 9.1% 1 8.6% 3 16.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

For services (e.g. bank, building society, hairdressers)

7.8% 8 8.3% 3 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 14.3% 5 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

To use a leisure facility (cinema, sports centre, bowling)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

As a day visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0As a staying visitor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Eat out (e.g. take-away / café

/ restaurant) 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Work 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0To meet someone 3.9% 4 11.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Library/public services

(doctor, dentist, etc) 2.9% 3 2.8% 1 3.0% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Browsing 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Visit charity shop 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 6.1% 4 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No other reason/s) 49.0% 50 58.3% 21 43.9% 29 54.5% 6 45.7% 16 50.0% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 49.0% 50 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 108: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 59 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q06 What are the main things that you LIKE about [name of centre] ? Near / convenient 35.3% 36 41.7% 15 31.8% 21 18.2% 2 40.0% 14 35.7% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 35.3% 36 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Good public transport links 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is easy 3.9% 4 2.8% 1 4.5% 3 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is cheap 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of congestion on roads 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pedestrianised streets 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Little traffic-pedestrian

conflict 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Good directional signs to Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Convenient drop off / pick up stops for buses / good location of bus station

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Ease of access to all (with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc)

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Well signposted route ways / good local maps

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other access / transport factor

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

General cleanliness of shopping streets

12.7% 13 13.9% 5 12.1% 8 0.0% 0 14.3% 5 14.3% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Feels safe / absence of threatening individuals / groups

7.8% 8 2.8% 1 10.6% 7 0.0% 0 11.4% 4 7.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Presence of police / other security measures

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Nice busy feel 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Not too crowded 12.7% 13 11.1% 4 13.6% 9 18.2% 2 8.6% 3 14.3% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Character / atmosphere 17.6% 18 13.9% 5 19.7% 13 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 26.8% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 17.6% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Historic buildings / tourist

attractions 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other environmental factor 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Selection / choice of

independent / specialist shops

46.1% 47 33.3% 12 53.0% 35 36.4% 4 42.9% 15 50.0% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 46.1% 47 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Selection / choice of multiple shops (i.e. high street chains such as Boots etc)

5.9% 6 8.3% 3 4.5% 3 9.1% 1 5.7% 2 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of shops 4.9% 5 2.8% 1 6.1% 4 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 7.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Specified shops 2.9% 3 2.8% 1 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Prices are competitive in

shops compared to other 5.9% 6 5.6% 2 6.1% 4 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 7.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 109: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 60 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

town/district centres Play area for children 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of places to eat 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of pubs / bars 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Range of services (banks,

insurance, hairdressers, etc)

3.9% 4 5.6% 2 3.0% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Range of leisure facilities 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other points on shops /

attractions 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

I like everything about [centre]

10.8% 11 8.3% 3 12.1% 8 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 16.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Community spirit 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friendly 12.7% 13 16.7% 6 10.6% 7 9.1% 1 22.9% 8 7.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice village 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is rural 2.0% 2 5.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is a nice place 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The butchers 3.9% 4 2.8% 1 4.5% 3 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fresh food shops 4.9% 5 5.6% 2 4.5% 3 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pet shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Post Office 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is compact 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0It is quiet 2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0The market 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No opinion) 2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 110: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 61 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q07 What are the main things you DISLIKE about [name of centre]? Unsafe for pedestrians /

traffic conflict 2.0% 2 5.6% 2 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Not enough pedestrianisation 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Difficulties in parking 15.7% 16 11.1% 4 18.2% 12 9.1% 1 14.3% 5 17.9% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.7% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Location of parking 5.9% 6 2.8% 1 7.6% 5 9.1% 1 5.7% 2 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parking is expensive 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 4.5% 3 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor public transport links 4.9% 5 5.6% 2 4.5% 3 9.1% 1 5.7% 2 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Road congestion 3.9% 4 2.8% 1 4.5% 3 0.0% 0 11.4% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor directional signs to

Centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor signage / routeways within centre / lack of maps of centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inconvenient location of bus stops / bus station

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Difficulties with pushchairs, wheelchairs, etc

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other transport / access factor

3.9% 4 5.6% 2 3.0% 2 9.1% 1 5.7% 2 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Dirty shopping streets 2.0% 2 5.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Feels unsafe / presence of

threatening individuals / groups

1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Lack of police presence / other security measures

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Lack of street furniture / floral displays

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Not busy enough 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Over-crowded 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other environmental factor 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0General lack of choice of

multiple shops 2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

General lack of independent / specialist shops

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of shops is inadequate

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Shops too small 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Lack of a larger supermarket 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Specified shops absent 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of places to

eat 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Inadequate range of services 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Inadequate range of leisure

facilities 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Absence of play areas for 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 111: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 62 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

children Other 2.0% 2 5.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0I dislike everything about

[centre] 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Poor pavements 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 6.1% 4 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Poor road condition 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Roadworks 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0In-filling 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No character 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Quality of greengrocers

inadequate 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Qualoty of childrens shops inadequate

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Quality of clothes shops inadequate

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Too many charity shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No clothes shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No electrical stores 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Need a Marks and Spencers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Don't want a betting shop 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too much development 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Too many empty shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(No opinion) 3.9% 4 8.3% 3 1.5% 1 9.1% 1 5.7% 2 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Nothing in particular) 50.0% 51 47.2% 17 51.5% 34 54.5% 6 40.0% 14 55.4% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 50.0% 51 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 112: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 63 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q08 How could [name of centre] best be improved for shopping? Specified new shop 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better choice of shops in

general 6.9% 7 2.8% 1 9.1% 6 27.3% 3 5.7% 2 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better quality of shops 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 3.9% 4 8.3% 3 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 11.4% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More parking 14.7% 15 13.9% 5 15.2% 10 9.1% 1 22.9% 8 10.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.7% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 6.1% 4 9.1% 1 5.7% 2 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improved security measures / policing

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More children’s play areas 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redevelopments/changes to

site 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 6.9% 7 5.6% 2 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 8.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A butchers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Clothes shops 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Childrens shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Delicatessen 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Greengrocer 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0An electrical store 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Waitrose 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Woolworths 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Marks and Spencers 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A better / bigger supermarket 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A one way system 3.9% 4 11.1% 4 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 2.9% 1 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Shoe shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Less empty shops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Independent shops 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Free parking 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 18.6% 19 22.2% 8 16.7% 11 9.1% 1 14.3% 5 23.2% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.6% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 35.3% 36 25.0% 9 40.9% 27 18.2% 2 31.4% 11 41.1% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 35.3% 36 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 113: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 64 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q09 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Yes 20.6% 21 19.4% 7 21.2% 14 45.5% 5 20.0% 7 16.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 68.6% 70 72.2% 26 66.7% 44 36.4% 4 74.3% 26 71.4% 40 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 68.6% 70 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 10.8% 11 8.3% 3 12.1% 8 18.2% 2 5.7% 2 12.5% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 Q10 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] is lacking in? Those who said Yes at Q09 Cinema 14.3% 3 0.0% 0 21.4% 3 20.0% 1 28.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 23.8% 5 42.9% 3 14.3% 2 20.0% 1 28.6% 2 22.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.8% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 4.8% 1 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 9.5% 2 0.0% 0 14.3% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.5% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nightclubs 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 14.3% 3 14.3% 1 14.3% 2 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 22.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nothing 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 7.1% 1 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A swimming pool 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 7.1% 1 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Childrens facilities 23.8% 5 14.3% 1 28.6% 4 20.0% 1 14.3% 1 33.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23.8% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Skate park 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 14.3% 3 14.3% 1 14.3% 2 20.0% 1 14.3% 1 11.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 14.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 21 7 14 5 7 9 0 0 21 0 0 Q11 Where should these leisure facilities be situated? Those who said Yes at Q09 Don't know 85.7% 18 100.0% 7 78.6% 11 100.0% 5 85.7% 6 77.8% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 85.7% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0High Street 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Where the existing one is 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 14.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 7.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 21 7 14 5 7 9 0 0 21 0 0 Q12 Are there any types of leisure facilities that you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Yes 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 91.2% 93 91.7% 33 90.9% 60 81.8% 9 91.4% 32 92.9% 52 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 91.2% 93 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 8.8% 9 8.3% 3 9.1% 6 18.2% 2 8.6% 3 7.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 114: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 65 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q13 Which types of leisure time uses (including food and drink uses) do you feel [name of centre] has too many of? Those who said Yes at Q12 Cinema 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bingo hall 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leisure centre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Health and fitness club 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Theatre 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pubs / bars 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Restaurants / cafes 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nightclubs 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Nothing 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 115: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 66 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

Q14 How could [name of centre] be improved to encourage people to spend more leisure time here? Specified new leisure

operator 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better choice of leisure destination in general

2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better quality of leisure uses 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More priority of pedestrians /

pedestrianisation 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Less traffic / congestion 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More shelter from wind /

rain 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Improve appearance / environment of centre

1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Remove litter more often 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More parking 8.8% 9 5.6% 2 10.6% 7 9.1% 1 8.6% 3 8.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 8.8% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cheaper parking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More accessible car parking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better bus services to the

centre 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better late night public transport

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

New / relocated bus stops 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Improved security measures /

policing 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Better signposting within the Centre

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Redevelopments/changes to site

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Other 12.7% 13 11.1% 4 13.6% 9 27.3% 3 8.6% 3 12.5% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0More restaurants 2.9% 3 2.8% 1 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Swimming pool 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Youth facilities 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Better cinema 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0A nightclub 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Parks 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Don’t know) 50.0% 51 55.6% 20 47.0% 31 45.5% 5 48.6% 17 51.8% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 50.0% 51 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(None mentioned) 15.7% 16 19.4% 7 13.6% 9 9.1% 1 17.1% 6 16.1% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.7% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 GEN Gender Male 35.3% 36 100.0% 36 0.0% 0 27.3% 3 42.9% 15 32.1% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 35.3% 36 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Female 64.7% 66 0.0% 0 100.0% 66 72.7% 8 57.1% 20 67.9% 38 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 64.7% 66 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 116: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 67 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

AGE Age 16 – 24 years 3.9% 4 2.8% 1 4.5% 3 36.4% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 025 – 34 years 6.9% 7 5.6% 2 7.6% 5 63.6% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 035 – 44 years 12.7% 13 22.2% 8 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 37.1% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 12.7% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 045 – 54 years 21.6% 22 19.4% 7 22.7% 15 0.0% 0 62.9% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.6% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 055 – 64 years 22.5% 23 22.2% 8 22.7% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 41.1% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22.5% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 065+ years 32.4% 33 27.8% 10 34.8% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 58.9% 33 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32.4% 33 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 INT Do you have access to the internet either at home or at work? Yes both 33.3% 34 50.0% 18 24.2% 16 54.5% 6 62.9% 22 10.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33.3% 34 0.0% 0 0.0% 0at home only 35.3% 36 27.8% 10 39.4% 26 45.5% 5 28.6% 10 37.5% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 35.3% 36 0.0% 0 0.0% 0at work only 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0no access to the internet 30.4% 31 19.4% 7 36.4% 24 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 51.8% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30.4% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 EMP Employment: Which of these activities best describes what you are doing at present? (code one answer only) Employee in full-time job

(30 hours plus) 28.4% 29 50.0% 18 16.7% 11 45.5% 5 51.4% 18 10.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 28.4% 29 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Employee in part-time job (under 30 hours)

13.7% 14 5.6% 2 18.2% 12 36.4% 4 17.1% 6 7.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.7% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Self-employed full or part-time

7.8% 8 8.3% 3 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 20.0% 7 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Full-time education at school, college or university

2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

On a government supported training scheme

0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Unemployed and available for work

1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Permanently sick / disabled 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wholly retired from work 34.3% 35 30.6% 11 36.4% 24 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 62.5% 35 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 34.3% 35 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Looking after the home 10.8% 11 0.0% 0 16.7% 11 0.0% 0 8.6% 3 14.3% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Doing something else 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 117: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 68 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

LOC1 Location of workplace: Those who are employed Ashtead 2.0% 1 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bookham 19.6% 10 21.7% 5 17.9% 5 11.1% 1 19.4% 6 27.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 19.6% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Cobham 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 1 11.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Croydon 2.0% 1 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Dorking 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Epsom 3.9% 2 0.0% 0 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.9% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Fetcham 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Guildford 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Work at home 7.8% 4 4.3% 1 10.7% 3 11.1% 1 6.5% 2 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7.8% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Kingston 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Leatherhead 5.9% 3 4.3% 1 7.1% 2 11.1% 1 3.2% 1 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0London 5.9% 3 4.3% 1 7.1% 2 22.2% 2 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Mole Valley 2.0% 1 4.3% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Redhill 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Sutton 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tadworth 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Varies 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other 13.7% 7 17.4% 4 10.7% 3 11.1% 1 9.7% 3 27.3% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 13.7% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 29.4% 15 34.8% 8 25.0% 7 22.2% 2 35.5% 11 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 29.4% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 51 23 28 9 31 11 0 0 51 0 0 LOC2 Is This Within The Centre of Survey Town Those who mentioned a location of workplace Yes 36.1% 13 46.7% 7 28.6% 6 28.6% 2 30.0% 6 55.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 36.1% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 63.9% 23 53.3% 8 71.4% 15 71.4% 5 70.0% 14 44.4% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 63.9% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 36 15 21 7 20 9 0 0 36 0 0 ILL Do you have any long standing illness, disability or infirmity that affects your day to day activities? Yes 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 9.1% 6 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 8.9% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0No 94.1% 96 100.0% 36 90.9% 60 100.0% 11 97.1% 34 91.1% 51 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 94.1% 96 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 118: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 69 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

ETH Ethnicity: White - British 99.0% 101 100.0% 36 98.5% 65 100.0% 11 97.1% 34 100.0% 56 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 99.0% 101 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White - Irish 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other White background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Black Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and black African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0White and Asian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other mixed background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Indian 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Pakistani 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Bangladeshi 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Asian background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Caribbean 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0African 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Any other Black background 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Chinese 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Other ethnic group 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0(Refused) 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 DAY Day of interview: Monday 25.5% 26 25.0% 9 25.8% 17 45.5% 5 14.3% 5 28.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.5% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Tuesday 24.5% 25 30.6% 11 21.2% 14 18.2% 2 20.0% 7 28.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Wednesday 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Thursday 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Friday 25.5% 26 25.0% 9 25.8% 17 9.1% 1 34.3% 12 23.2% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.5% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Saturday 24.5% 25 19.4% 7 27.3% 18 27.3% 3 31.4% 11 19.6% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 ADU Number of adults (incl. resp.): One 18.6% 19 8.3% 3 24.2% 16 9.1% 1 5.7% 2 28.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18.6% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 64.7% 66 72.2% 26 60.6% 40 81.8% 9 62.9% 22 62.5% 35 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 64.7% 66 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 10.8% 11 16.7% 6 7.6% 5 9.1% 1 20.0% 7 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 10.8% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 5.9% 6 2.8% 1 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 11.4% 4 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 119: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 70 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

CHI No. of children 15 years and under: None 78.4% 80 77.8% 28 78.8% 52 45.5% 5 54.3% 19 100.0% 56 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 78.4% 80 0.0% 0 0.0% 0One 6.9% 7 5.6% 2 7.6% 5 27.3% 3 11.4% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 11.8% 12 13.9% 5 10.6% 7 18.2% 2 28.6% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11.8% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 9.1% 1 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 CAR Number of cars in Household: None 20.6% 21 19.4% 7 21.2% 14 9.1% 1 14.3% 5 26.8% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0One 25.5% 26 19.4% 7 28.8% 19 36.4% 4 14.3% 5 30.4% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25.5% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Two 45.1% 46 58.3% 21 37.9% 25 45.5% 5 57.1% 20 37.5% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 45.1% 46 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Three 6.9% 7 2.8% 1 9.1% 6 9.1% 1 8.6% 3 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 6.9% 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Four or more 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 0.0% 0 5.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0 LOC3 Location of Interview: Top Church Rd (Linen Press

to Well Shod) 24.5% 25 25.0% 9 24.2% 16 45.5% 5 20.0% 7 23.2% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24.5% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Top High St (Bookham Pharmacy to Brackenburys)

32.4% 33 38.9% 14 28.8% 19 27.3% 3 37.1% 13 30.4% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32.4% 33 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Bottom High St (around Rusts Supermarket)

27.5% 28 22.2% 8 30.3% 20 9.1% 1 20.0% 7 35.7% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27.5% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

1-15 Grove Corner, Lower Shott

15.7% 16 13.9% 5 16.7% 11 18.2% 2 22.9% 8 10.7% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 15.7% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 120: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 71 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

PC BN5 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Blank 5.9% 6 8.3% 3 4.5% 3 0.0% 0 11.4% 4 3.6% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.9% 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR0 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR5 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0CR8 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DD8 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0DH5 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU11 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU12 4 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU2 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 2 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU21 8 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU22 8 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU3 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0GU6 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0IP24 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT10 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT11 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT14 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT15 7 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT17 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT18 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 8 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT19 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT20 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 2 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT21 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 121: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 72 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

KT22 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 3 2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 4 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 8 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT22 9 9.8% 10 2.8% 1 13.6% 9 9.1% 1 17.1% 6 5.4% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9.8% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 2.0% 2 2.8% 1 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 1 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 9.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 3 30.4% 31 27.8% 10 31.8% 21 27.3% 3 28.6% 10 32.1% 18 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30.4% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 4 30.4% 31 30.6% 11 30.3% 20 18.2% 2 17.1% 6 41.1% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30.4% 31 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT23 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 5 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 3.0% 2 18.2% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT24 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT27 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT4 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0KT8 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0LU4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N19 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0N77 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NR32 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0NW6 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH1 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH12 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH13 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH2 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH20 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH3 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH4 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH5 6 2.9% 3 5.6% 2 1.5% 1 9.1% 1 2.9% 1 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH6 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0RH8 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SM5 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Page 122: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Bookham Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centre Study Page 73 for Roger Tym & Partners March 2007

Total Male Female 16 - 34 35 - 54 55 + Ashtead Fetcham Bookham Dorking Leatherhead

210307 NEMS market research

SM7 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SS13 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SU1 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW17 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW19 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW20 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0SW7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0T21 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN37 7 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TN7 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TQ14 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0TW12 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W14 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0W2 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0YO26 6 1.0% 1 2.8% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Base: 102 36 66 11 35 56 0 0 102 0 0

Page 123: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

APPENDIX 3 Business Survey - Dorking Leatherhead Ashtead Fetcham Bookham

Page 124: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 125: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

DORKING

Q1c Type of shop Ret - Retail Shop; Fin - Financial / Professional Services; Res - Restaurant / Café; Pub - Public House / Bar; HFT - Hot food takeway; Bus - Business / Offices; Hot - Hotel / B&B etc; Others stated

Q2a About the business Nat - National multiple chain; Reg - Regional multiple chain; Ind - Independent, individual business

Q2b If part of chain, no. of outlets

Q3 Business Premises FH - Freehold; LH - Leasehold

Q4 Size of business premises 1 - Up to 500 sq ft / 46 sq m; 2 - 501-1,000sq ft / 47-93 sq m; 3 - 1,001 - 1,500 sq ft / 93-139 sq m; 4 - 1,501-5,000sq ft /139-465 sq m; 5 -Over 5,000 sq ft / 465 sq m

Q5 Upper floors at business premises (a) upper floors: Y - Yes; N - No, (b) If yes, how many?, ( c) Are these upper floors Used; Vac, (d) Used for /as O-Offices; Rt-Retail Sales; S-Storage; Rs-Residential; Other, (e) Upper floors occupied by your business, (f) If yes, which floors

Q6 Employees: F - Full time ; P - Part time; C/V - Casualties / volunteers

Q7 Vacancies: - F - Full time ; P - Part time

Q8 Time at Premise 1 - Less than 1 year; 2 - 1-2 years; 3 - 2-5 years; 4 - 5-10 years; 5 - More than 10 years

Q9 Satisfaction with premises -Y - Yes; N - No

Q10 Reason for dissatisfaction 1 - Premises too small; 2 - Premises too large; 3 - Prefer better location; 4 - Poor conditions; 5 - Inconvenient servicing; Others stated

Q11 Turnover (a) over the past year: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, (b) in the year ahead: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, ( c) - Do you think your turnover is - Above average; Average; Below Average

Q12 Future intentions (a) Intentions in the next 5 years - 1 - Remain in existing premises; 2 - Relocate elsewhere in same town/village; 3 - Relocate to another town/village in Mole Valley; 4 - Relocate outside Mole Valley; 5 - Sell business as going concern; 6 -Close business (b) If relocating - where and why ( c) If closing - why

Q13 Opiniong of town / village centre G - Good ; S - Satisfactory ; P - Poor (i) Multiple shops / chains, (ii) Independent / specilaist, (iii) Restaurants/cafes/takeaways, (iv) Pubs, (v) Services eg. banks etc, Range of shops etc

Q14 Future of town / village centres, five most important things to addressA - Seek to improve the number of national retailers; B - Seek to increase the number of speciality retailers ; C - Improve the appearance of the town / village centre ; D - Reduce crime ; E - Manage traffic congestion ; F - Provide more dwellings in the town / village centre ; G - Improve public transport to the town / village centre; H - Increase the amount of car parking; I - Improve recreational / leisure facilities;

J - Improve the marketing of the centre ; K - Highlight the centre's importance as a tourist / visitor destination; L - Increase the number of markets; M - Increase the number of festivals; N - Increase the provision of hotel / guest accommodation; O - Increase the provision of conference facilities; P - Improve cleanliness

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8 Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F PC/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Other

O Rt S Rs Other G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Fin / Prof Nat 800 LH Y 1 U

Alternative Medicine Clinic N 4 3 1 1 5 Y S U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 5 3

Ret Ind LH 1 N N 2 1 5 Y U S Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 1Ret Ind LH 1 N 5 Y D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 5 1 2 5 4 1 4 1 1 3 3 4 5 3Fin / Prof Ind LH 3 Y 1 U 1 N 1 1 3 Y D D Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 3 3 2 1 1 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 2 URaworth Centre College N 3 1 5 1 D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 3 5 Y D D Average 6

High business rates 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

General cleanliness good but street cleaning poor and no flowers 2 1 3 4 5

Fin / Prof Ind

FH + LH 2 N 8 1 5 4 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 5

Res / Café Nat LH Y 2 U 1 1 Y All 12 6 1 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Ret Ind FH 3 Y 1 N 2 2 Y U U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Ret Ind LH 2 N N 1 5 Y D D Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Bus / Off Ind FH 1 Y U U 1 N 1 5 Y D U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3

Conf. Agency Ind LH 2 Y 2 U 1 Y 4 4 5 N 3 S S Average 2

Dorking. Lease expiring. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 1 2 4

Ret Ind LH Y 1 U 1 Y1st floor 1 4 2 3 Y U U Average 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Nat 1000+ 5 N U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 2 5Ret Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 1 Y 3 2 3 1 D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 4 4 2 2 3 2 5 3 3 4 3 Parking is too Ret Ind FH 2 N 2 1 4 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 5

Fin / Prof Ind LH 3 Y 2 U 1 1

1st & 2nd 3 1 5 Y D U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 4

Fin / Prof Ind FH Y 2 U 1 Y All 14 10 Y S D Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 5 4Ret Ind LH 4 Y 1 V Y 1st 2 5 Y U D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Ind FH 2 N 4 2 1 3 Y D S Average 4

Epson, Horsham / Crawley. Dorking not moving with current trends. Fixed in the past. Less potential customers coming to Dorking than before. Council needs to radically alter its policies if Dorking is to survive as a commercial centre.

Dorking dying as a commercial centre. More shoppers are going to Horsham, Crawley, Sutton and Kingston. Too much is happending and the council is sleeping. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

More needs to be done to encourage large multiple chain stores to Dorking. 1 5 4 2 3

Reduce cost of car parking.

Q12

i) ii)

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

d) iii) iv) v) Range of shops Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accom

Access by car

Q14Q13

Clean-liness

Directional Signs

Disability access

Character / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport

Page 126: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8 Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F PC/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Other

O Rt S Rs Other G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Q12

i) ii)

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

d) iii) iv) v) Range of shops Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accom

Access by car

Q14Q13

Clean-liness

Directional Signs

Disability access

Character / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport

Ret Ind FH Y 1 U 1 Y All 5 Y D S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 3 4Ret Ind LH 4 N 1 1 5 Y D S Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2

Res / Café Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 Y 1 3 3 1 3 N 1, 3 U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

We have best run restaurants in the country. Dorking was knows fot best 5 4 3 2 1

Healthcare Ind FH 2 Y 2 U 1 Surgery Y All 3 1 2 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Too many empty shops with fly 3 2 5 4

1 - Fill empty shops

Ret Ind FH 2 Y 1 U 1 Y 2 1 5 Y D U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 1 2 3Ret Ind FH 3 N 5 1 3 Y S S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 3 5 1 3 3 5 5 3 5 4 4 3 1 3

Ret Ind LH Y 2 U 1 N 1 3 Y U S Average 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 5

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 2 U 1 Y 1 1 1 5 Y D D Average 6

Turnover down. Rent & Rates Up. Poor parking in the area. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 1 4

Ret Ind LH Y U 1 N 1 1 1 Y U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 5

2 - Needs more children's clothes and shoe shops

Ret Ind FH 4 Y 1 U 1 N 4 5 N 1, 5 D D 4

Reigate. Better facilities, access to town. More parking. Not a ghost town like Dorking. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3

Ret Ind FH 2 Y V 1 Y Y 5 5 Y D U Below 1Retirement 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 4 5

Fin / Prof Ind FH Y 1 U 1 N 60 5 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Poor parking for businesses 1 1 1

Ret Nat 280 LH 4 Y 2 U 1 1 Staff facilities Y All 2 10 3 1 4 Y D U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

V. bad roadworks since before x'mas.Too many empty shops.No pedestrian crossings.No support for busineses from local papers.Poor signage for roadworks. 2 3 1 4 5 5

Ret Ind FH 1 N 1 2 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Not many children's facilities. 2 5 5 2 2 5 5 5 3 2 2 1 1 2 4 3

Ret Ind LH 2 N 3 1 4 Y D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Too many charity shops and vacant units 3 2 5 4 1

Res / Café Ind Lh 1 Y 1 U 1 N 2 2 5 N

Rent & rates too high D D Average 4

Sunny?Rent & rate 1 1 1 1 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 1 U 1 Y 4 4 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH 2 N 5 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Fill vacant shop premises

Ret Nat 500 LH 1 Y 2 U 1 1 Staff areasYes Both 3 1 5 1 U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 4

Ret Nat 220 LH 2 N 5 2 5 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 4 3 1 - ToiletsFin / Prof Nat LH Y 2 U 1 1 Y 1st 8 5 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 2Fin / Prof Nat 60 LH 2 Y 2 U 1 1 Y Both 6 1 5 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 1 5Res / Café Ind LH 1 N 3 3 4 N 3, 5 D D Below 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 5 3

Ret Ind LH 1 N 7 2 5 N 3 D D Below 4

D/K location. Poor support frm Mole Valley 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Pub / Bar Nat 1000 Y 2 U 1 1 1 Y All 2 8 1 Y U S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH 4 Y 2 U 1 N 1 1 5 N1,3, would like FH shop U U Average 2

Dorking area.Gain a FH for long term investment. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Road, pavement conidtion very poor. Pump corner -a mess! Very unprofessional - slow & poor quality. 3 1 4 5 2

Please see questionnaire.

Page 127: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8 Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F PC/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Other

O Rt S Rs Other G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Q12

i) ii)

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

d) iii) iv) v) Range of shops Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accom

Access by car

Q14Q13

Clean-liness

Directional Signs

Disability access

Character / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 1 Y 2 1 D D Below 6

Cannot survive since rent increased by £2,500 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1

1 - Lower rents & rates.

Ret Ind LH 2 N 4 1 3 N 1 U U Above 2

Dorking.Larger premises / better location. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 4 5

Fin / Prof Nat FH 2 Y U 1 N 3 2 2 2 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 5

Ret Ind 2 LH 2 Y 3 U 1 N 3 Y D D Below 4

Anywhere but Dorking.Dorking does not attract enough trade. Too many charity shops not enough clothing / deli / wine bar / indeoendent shops / names

In an ideal world we would relocate to a town that is busier wit more footfall - Dorking dead during the day and dying - loads of empty shops and charity shops. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Better signage for car parks at the entrance of the town & the car park opp. Is not well sign posted. 3 5 4 2 1

gserious investment in attracting more quality shops and national names - there is not enough to draw people in. No reason why Dorking cannot equal Reigate or be better. Too many charity shops, demean the high st. Dorking to move into 21st century or dies. The road works footfall this yr (also due to wks of roadworks) has halved. Have been here 5 years, the town is deserted.

Ret Ind LH 4 Y 1 U 1 Y1st flr 2 5 N 3 D D Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Nat 580 FH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 2 2 5 N 1 U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 5 4

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 2 U Chiropractor N 2 2 N 1 U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Plenty car parks but should be free to shoppers 2 1 5 3 4

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 2 U 1 N 1 4 N

3. Poor stopping facilities for motorist to drop in cleaning S S Below 5

gBusiness is improving and we get a good retrun 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

pbusiness on high st, free car parking for 3hrs should be allowed in the 1 2 4 3 5

Ret Ind LH 1 N 1 3 Y S S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 4 5

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 2 U N 3 1 4 Y D D Average

The impact of the roadworks at bothe ends of the high st. 1 5 2 3 4

Fin / Prof Nat 1100 LH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 6 5 N

Inadequate parking facilities. U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 4 4 2 4 4 4 5 3 2 2

Ret Ind 2 LH 1 Y 2 U 1 1 1 Y All 1 7 1 2 N

Would prefer all on one floor, not split D S Average 2

HighTo have shop & store on one floor, no stairs to stockroom.

If new lease increase is high - due this year 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 1 4

Ret Nat 500 LH 5 Y 2 U 1 1 Y All 20 40 2 1 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 4

Ret Ind FH 2 Y 1 U 1 1 Y 1st 4 2 2 5 Y S D Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 51 - Free parking for shoppers

Ret Ind LH 2 N N 1 5 Y U U Above

Rent & rates too high 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Small silver jewellery & Bric-brac Ind LH 1 Y U 1 N 5 Y D S Below

Fin / Prof Nat 73 FH Y 4

UV 1 Y

er back floors 4 2 5 N 3 U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Fin / Prof Ind LH 3 Y 2 U Chiropractic N 5 2 2 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 3 4Fin / Prof Reg 350 Y 2 U 1 3 1 1 Y S U Above 1 1 1 1 1 3

Free car parks to retailers

Ret Nat 5000 FH 1 Y 2 U 1 1 Staff restrooms Y 4 2 2 5 Y D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 2 3

Ret Ind FH 3 Y 2 U 1 1 Y 7 4 5 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 3 4

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 1 U 1 Staff Area N 6 4 2 2 NHigh service charge D U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Trader uncertainty re Sainsbury development 1 5 2 3 4

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 1 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Parking should be free 4 2 5 1 3

Page 128: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8 Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F PC/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Other

O Rt S Rs Other G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Q12

i) ii)

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

d) iii) iv) v) Range of shops Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accom

Access by car

Q14Q13

Clean-liness

Directional Signs

Disability access

Character / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport

Fin / Prof Ind LH 2 Y 2 U 1 N 3 1 1 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2

Res / Café Ind LH Y 2 U 1 Y Both 1 12 5 Y S D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 4

Would like large supermarket in town. To end council policy of retail units to A3 caused lost v. good retails units to A3 and now no diversity of shops along high st.

Caterers Ind LH 2 N 2 8 1 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 5 2 3Fin / Prof Nat 19 2 Y U 1 N 1 1 1 2 1 Y U U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 1 5

Res / Café Ind LH 3 Y 2 U 1 N 4 1 2 5 Y D U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Extremely poor road surface conditions throughout.

Pub / Bar Ind 3 N 5. No parking D S Average 5 1 3 2 4

Pub / Bar Ind 2 Y 2 U 1 N 7 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Too much infill development.Not enough free car parking for residents. 3 2 1 4

5 - Residential free parking

Hotel Nat FH 5 Y 2 U Hotel rooms Y Both 26 20 2 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 4

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 2 U 1 N 2 2 1 3 N 3 D D Average 4

Not sure.Dorking a dying town 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 5 2

Ret Nat 2000 LH 1 N 2 1 1 3 Y S U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 4 3Res / Café Reg FH 4 Y U 1 N 6 10 3 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 3 5

Res / Café Reg FH 4 Y 2 U Restaurant Y

Both floors 5 4 1 2 3 Y S S Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Car parks need more lighting 4 1 2 3 5

Ret Ind LH 1 Y U 1 1 1 Y both 1 2 5 Y S S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 5Fin / Prof Ind 5 LH 3 Y 2 U 1 1 Y All 19 5 5 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 5 4

Fin / Prof Nat LH 2 Y 3 U 1 3 5 Y D D Below 5

Woolwich is closing this year. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 2 5

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 1 U 1 Y1st floor 4 3 2 1 1 N

3. St Martin's is like a ghost town. D D Below 2

West st.More passing trade. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Parking charges too high. Traffic wardens too harsh. 1 5 3 2 4

Page 129: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

LEATHERHEAD

Q1c Type of shop Ret - Retail Shop; Fin - Financial / Professional Services; Res - Restaurant / Café; Pub - Public House / Bar; HFT - Hot food takeway; Bus - Business / Offices; Hot - Hotel / B&B etc; Others stated

Q2a About the business Nat - National multiple chain; Reg - Regional multiple chain; Ind - Independent, individual business

Q2b If part of chain, no. of outlets

Q3 Business Premises FH - Freehold; LH - Leasehold

Q4 Size of business premises 1 - Up to 500 sq ft / 46 sq m; 2 - 501-1,000sq ft / 47-93 sq m; 3 - 1,001 - 1,500 sq ft / 93-139 sq m; 4 - 1,501-5,000sq ft /139-465 sq m; 5 -Over 5,000 sq ft / 465 sq m

Q5 Upper floors at business premises (a) upper floors: Y - Yes; N - No, (b) If yes, how many?, ( c) Are these upper floors Used; Vac, (d) Used for /as O-Offices; Rt-Retail Sales; S-Storage; Rs-Residential; Other, (e) Upper floors occupied by your business, (f) If yes, which floors

Q6 Employees: F - Full time ; P - Part time; C/V - Casualties / volunteers

Q7 Vacancies: - F - Full time ; P - Part time

Q8 Time at Premise 1 - Less than 1 year; 2 - 1-2 years; 3 - 2-5 years; 4 - 5-10 years; 5 - More than 10 years

Q9 Satisfaction with premises -Y - Yes; N - No

Q10 Reason for dissatisfaction 1 - Premises too small; 2 - Premises too large; 3 - Prefer better location; 4 - Poor conditions; 5 - Inconvenient servicing; Others stated

Q11 Turnover (a) over the past year: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, (b) in the year ahead: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, ( c) - Do you think your turnover is - Above average; Average; Below Average

Q12 Future intentions (a) Intentions in the next 5 years - 1 - Remain in existing premises; 2 - Relocate elsewhere in same town/village; 3 - Relocate to another town/village in Mole Valley; 4 - Relocate outside Mole Valley; 5 - Sell business as going concern; 6 -Close business (b) If relocating - where and why ( c) If closing - why

Q13 Opiniong of town / village centre G - Good ; S - Satisfactory ; P - Poor (i) Multiple shops / chains, (ii) Independent / specilaist, (iii) Restaurants/cafes/takeaways, (iv) Pubs, (v) Services eg. banks etc, Range of shops etc

Q14 Future of town / village centres, five most important things to addressA - Seek to improve the number of national retailers; B - Seek to increase the number of speciality retailers ; C - Improve the appearance of the town / village centre ; D - Reduce crime ; E - Manage traffic congestion ; F - Provide more dwellings in the town / village centre ; G - Improve public transport to the town / village centre; H - Increase the amount of car parking; I - Improve recreational / leisure facilities;J - Improve the marketing of the centre ; K - Highlight the centre's importance as a tourist / visitor destination; L - Increase the number of markets; M - Increase the number of festivals; N - Increase the provision of hotel / guest accommodation; O - Increase the provision of conference facilities; P - Improve cleanliness

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8

Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F P C/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P OtherO Rt S RsOther G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

1 2 4 5 3Council LH Y 2 U 1 N 3 4 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 3 4

Charity Nat 202 FH 2 Y 1 U 1 Int.rooms Y AllVol-100+ 5 N

Limited ability to make premises suitable for disabled volunteers /visitors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 1 5 2

Fin/Prof Ind LH 2 Y 2 U 1 Y All 5 5 Y S U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 4 4 2 3 3 3 4 2 4 3 3 1Craft centre Ind FH 4 N 2 2 1 5 N 4 D U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 2 4 1Ret Ind LH 2 Y 2 U 1 N 2 3 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 3 4 1Fin/Prof Nat 60,000 FH Y 2 U 1 Y 2 7 3 1 5 Y D D Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 5 1 3

Fin/Prof Nat LH 2 Y U 1 N 4 3 5 N 1 S S Average 2 LeatherheadLarger premises 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Nat 3 LH 2 N 2 3 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 5 Better priced long term

Tattoo Artist Ind LH Y

G+1 U

G flr - Waiting 1st flr-Studio 2 Y S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3

Car parking for shop owners would be good, often difficult to find parking nearby. Car parks too expensive - maybe a permit system.

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 Y 1 3 N

too small, better location & poor servicing D D Average 6

Lack of sales 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 4 5

Bus / Off Ind LH 2 N 2 2 3 Y S U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 4 2Ret Reg 7 LH 3 Y 1 U 1 Toilets N 1 8 3 4 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Ret Ind LH 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 5 1 1 5 3 1 3 2 1 5 5 5 5 1

Ret Nat 300 LH 1 Y 1 USorting stock Y 1 1 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2

Ret Nat 360 LH 4 N 1 1 1 4 1 D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Ret/ Charity Shop Ind 13 LH 2 Y 1 V 1 N 1st 1 15 3 Y D S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 3 4Bus / Off Ind FH 2 N 6 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 4 5

Fin / Prof Ind FH 3 Y 2 U 1 Y 2 7 3 1 5 Y S S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 4Ret Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 1 1 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 5

Com-munity Assoc Ind LH Y 2 U 1

Recrea-tion, Edu-cation, Social Com-munity activi-ties Y

1st floor 2 5 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5

Social Centre for over 60s MVDC LH 5 N 1 2 5 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Ret Ind LH 3 Y 1 U 1 N 5 2 1 4 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 5 1 2Dental Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 1 3 1 4 N 1 S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3Ret Ind FH N 5 1 4 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 4outlet, Nat 1017 FH 5 Y 2 U 1 N 23 1 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Medical practice Ind 2

FH + LH 3 Y 1 U 1 Y 50 2 5 N 1 D D Average 2

New site in Leatherhead.Lease expired. Req more space. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 5 3 3 1 1 5 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 3

Bus / Off Ind LH 1 N 1 1 1 5 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 3 1 2Fin / Prof Nat 1000+ LH Y 2 U 1 Y 2 10 5 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5Fin/Prof Ind LH 1 Y U 1 1 N 2 1 1 2 N 3 & 4 Rent & S D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 5 3

Q12

i) ii)

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

d) iii) iv) v) Range of shops Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accom

Access by car

Q14Q13

Clean-liness

Direc-tional Signs

Disa-bility access

Charac-ter / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport

Page 130: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8

Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F P C/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P OtherO Rt S RsOther G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Q12

i) ii)

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

d) iii) iv) v) Range of shops Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accom

Access by car

Q14Q13

Clean-liness

Direc-tional Signs

Disa-bility access

Charac-ter / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport

Fin / Prof Reg 4 FH 3 Y 1 U 1 Y All 34 6 5 Y U D Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Current high st opening times & new parking/warden monitored regime is really damaging retailers, although does not effect us. 3 2 5 4

1 - Improve vehicle access. Provide free 1/2 hr parking in high st essential.

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 Y 1st 3 2 1 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 4 3Fin/Prof Ind FH Y 2 U 1 1 N 5 5 N 1 D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 1 3 3 3 5 3 5 5 3Ret Ind FH Y 1 U 1 1 Y 1 7 2 5 Y D S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Ret Ind LH 5 Y 3 U 1 Y 2 3 4 1 1 5 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Ret Ind LH 3 N 2 2 1 N 1&3 D U Same 4Kent/Berkshire

Poor image/Reputation of leatherhead, lack of shoppers 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 4 3

Ret Reg 2 LH 4 Y 2 U 1 N 1 3 2 1 5 Y S D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 3 3 2 1Golf centre Ind FH 5 N 8 3 5 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Golf Ind FH 5 Y 2 U 1 1 1 1 18 6 12 5 Y U U Average 1 1 5 3 2 4

Design/Advertising Ind FH 1 Y U 1 Y 2 1 3 Y D S Same 5

Too difficult/costly to expand 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 5 1

Theatre Ind LH 4 Y 3 U 1 1 Y 3 3 5 20 3 Y U U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Ind 3 LH 4 N 20 5 5 1 5 N

Lack of parking, difficult for deliveries S S Average 4

Ashtead, Cobham, Epsom

Parking restrictions +lack of assistance from Council in comparison to Horsham Branch 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Town has declined since swan centre was built and parking restrictions imposed 3 1 5 4 2

Ret Ind LH 2 N 1 1 3 N 3 D D Below 4

Not sure.Too expensive.

If we find another location then we will move 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Ret Ind LH 1 N 4 1 1 5 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 1 5Chinese medicine Ind LH 2 N N 3 N 3 D S 6

bad business 1 3 3

Ret Ind LH 2 N 1 2 2 3 N

Not on High Street and parking is difficult S U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Businesses suffer as there is no waiting allowed on the street 4 1 2 3

5 - focus advertising on bridge Street rather than Church Street

Medical practice Ind LH 1 N 4 4 N

too small, poor condition D D Below 4 Sussex

cheaper rents / Leatherhead in decline 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Beauty Salon Ind LH 1 Y 1 U

Beauty Salon Y 3 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 4 3 2

Ret Nat LH 4 N 4 20 3 Y U U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3

Fin/Prof Ind LH 4 Y

1 upper U 1 Y 1st 16 5 Y S U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 2 5

Bus/off Ind LH 2 N 1 N 6 3 5 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 5 1 2

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 2 1 5 Y D S Above 3 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH Y 2 U 1 Y 1 3 Y D S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 5 5 5 4 5 1 1 5 5 5 5 2No retail shops eg cafes, takeaways

Farm Park Ind LH 5 Y 1 U 1 Y 1 15 70 5 N 1 S S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 5 3

Rugby Club Ind LH 1 Y 1 U

Club-house / shop / kitchen Y ≥ 5 5 N 1 U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 5 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2

Dancing school ind 2 Y 1 U

Church meetings N 2 5 Y D U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3

Page 131: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8

Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F P C/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P OtherO Rt S RsOther G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Q12

i) ii)

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

d) iii) iv) v) Range of shops Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accom

Access by car

Q14Q13

Clean-liness

Direc-tional Signs

Disa-bility access

Charac-ter / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport

Public Library Reg 52 FH 4 Y 1 U 1

Staff rest-room + kitchen Y 1st 1 6 5 N 1 S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 5 3

Museum oInd FH 1 Y 1 U 1 Display S Y 30 5 N

1, 3, listed 17c building relocation not feasible D S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH 1 N 1 5 Y S S Below 1 or 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Health Ind FH Y 1 U 1 Y 2 1 2 5 Y S U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 3 1 5

Ret Ind LH 2 Y U 1 N 4 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 5

Ret Nat 675+ LH N 5 3 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 3 4

Ret Ind 2 FH 3 Y 1 U 1 Y 1 3 1 4 Below 4

Because of the way the town is run by MVDC & SCC. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 4

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 2 U 1 N 2 3 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 5 2 4

Church Nat 100s FH 5 N 1 3 5 Y NA NA NA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 45 - Increase use of theatre

Ret Ind LH 4 N 5 2 4 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 5

Printshop Ind FH 3 Y 2 U 1 Y 1st 2 2 1 5 N 3, 4, 5 S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 5 1

Fin / Prof Nat 360 LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 3 4 N 4 U U Above 2

High Street - better candidate attraction 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5

Fin / Prof Ind LH 1 N U 1 N 2 20 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 5 3

Fin / Prof Ind FH 1 N 7 3 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 1 3 2

Fin / Prof Ind LH 4 Y 1 U 1 N 3 2 1 1 S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 5 3

Fin / Prof Nat 28 LH 3 N 3 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 5 4

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 1 V 1 Y 1 15 3 Y D S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 5 1 2

H F T Ind LH 1 Y 1 USitting area N 7 4 2 3 N 5 S D Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 4 4 4 4

Decrease no. of restaurants and cafes

Res / Caf Ind LH 2 Y 2 U 1 N 10 5 4 Y S U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 5 4

Res / Caf Ind LH 4 Y 2 U 1 N 8 8 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 3 1 2

Riding sc Ind FH N 1 1 5 Y D D Below 6 Too expensive 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 - improve the roads.

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 2 U 1 N 3 1 1 1 1 N 1 S U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Ret Nat 700 LH 2 Y 1 U 1 1 7 2 N 1 U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 5 4

Ret Ind LH 1 N 4 5 N

Very bad parking facilities S S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 1 4

Ret Nat 600 LH 1 N 1 1 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 4

Fin / Prof Reg LH 4 Y 1 U 1 Y 1 11 1 3 N 1 U U Above 2Anywher in Town Centre

Better space 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 5 2

Fin / Prof Ind FH 1 N 1 4 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3

Ease parking on local roads, encourage use of car parks and reduce exorbitant carges

Pub Ind FH 1 Y U 1 N 2 1 5 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 5 1 2

H F T Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 Y 3 2 5 Y D D Below 5 1

Ret Ind FH 1 N 1 1 5 Y U S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3

Ret Nat 500+ 2 Y 1 U 1 Loading BY 1st 6 20 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 2 5

Ret Nat 650 LH 2 N 2 4 1 5 Y S U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 1 3 4

Ret Reg 4 N 1 2 3 Y S U Average 1

Tyre & ExReg 19 LH 4 Y U Training RY 1st f 8 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1

Page 132: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 133: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

ASHTEAD

Q1c Type of shop Ret - Retail Shop; Fin - Financial / Professional Services; Res - Restaurant / Café; Pub - Public House / Bar; HFT - Hot food takeway; Bus - Business / Offices; Hot - Hotel / B&B etc; Others stated

Q2a About the business Nat - National multiple chain; Reg - Regional multiple chain; Ind - Independent, individual business

Q2b If part of chain, no. of outlets

Q3 Business Premises FH - Freehold; LH - Leasehold

Q4 Size of business premises 1 - Up to 500 sq ft / 46 sq m; 2 - 501-1,000sq ft / 47-93 sq m; 3 - 1,001 - 1,500 sq ft / 93-139 sq m; 4 - 1,501-5,000sq ft /139-465 sq m; 5 -Over 5,000 sq ft / 465 sq m

Q5 Upper floors at business premises (a) upper floors: Y - Yes; N - No, (b) If yes, how many?, ( c) Are these upper floors Used; Vac, (d) Used for /as O-Offices; Rt-Retail Sales; S-Storage; Rs-Residential; Other, (e) Upper floors occupied by your business, (f) If yes, which floors

Q6 Employees: F - Full time ; P - Part time; C/V - Casualties / volunteers

Q7 Vacancies: - F - Full time ; P - Part time

Q8 Time at Premise 1 - Less than 1 year; 2 - 1-2 years; 3 - 2-5 years; 4 - 5-10 years; 5 - More than 10 years

Q9 Satisfaction with premises -Y - Yes; N - No

Q10 Reason for dissatisfaction 1 - Premises too small; 2 - Premises too large; 3 - Prefer better location; 4 - Poor conditions; 5 - Inconvenient servicing; Others stated

Q11 Turnover (a) over the past year: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, (b) in the year ahead: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, ( c) - Do you think your turnover is - Above average; Average; Below Average

Q12 Future intentions (a) Intentions in the next 5 years - 1 - Remain in existing premises; 2 - Relocate elsewhere in same town/village; 3 - Relocate to another town/village in Mole Valley; 4 - Relocate outside Mole Valley; 5 - Sell business as going concern; 6 -Close business (b) If relocating - where and why ( c) If closing - why

Q13 Opiniong of town / village centre G - Good ; S - Satisfactory ; P - Poor (i) Multiple shops / chains, (ii) Independent / specilaist, (iii) Restaurants/cafes/takeaways, (iv) Pubs, (v) Services eg. banks etc, Range of shops etc

Q14 Future of town / village centres, five most important things to addressA - Seek to improve the number of national retailers; B - Seek to increase the number of speciality retailers ; C - Improve the appearance of the town / village centre ; D - Reduce crime ; E - Manage traffic congestion ; F - Provide more dwellings in the town / village centre ; G - Improve public transport to the town / village centre; H - Increase the amount of car parking; I - Improve recreational / leisure facilities;

J - Improve the marketing of the centre ; K - Highlight the centre's importance as a tourist / visitor destination; L - Increase the number of markets; M - Increase the number of festivals; N - Increase the provision of hotel / guest accommodation; O - Increase the provision of conference facilities; P - Improve cleanliness

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8 Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F P C/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Other

O Rt S Rs Other G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Ret Ind LH N 4 5 Y D D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4If M&S / waitrose came - a bonus

Health Svce Ind LH 5 Y 1 U 1 N 3 1 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 5

Ind LH 2 N 4 5 S U AboveVillage Hall Ind FH 5 Y 1 U 1 N 1 1 5 Y U U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 3Fin / Prof Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 2 1 1 1 2 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 3 2 3 2 4 2 1 3 3 3 4Res / Café Ind LH 2 N N 1 2 2 Y S S Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 1 V N 2 5 N

2.Rates & rent to expensive. D D Below 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Res / Café Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 1 3 1 Y Above 2

Ashtead.Larger. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 5

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 1 UBeauty Salon N 2 4 S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

HFT Ind LH 1 N 1 1 3 N 3 D D Below 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 1 2 3Pub / Bar Ind LH 3 Y 3 U 1 N 6 8 2 1 N 4 U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 5 1Fin / Prof Nat LH 4 Y 1 U 1 N 2 5 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 3

Bus / Off Ind LH 4 Y

Ground & 1st U 1 Y 6 5 Y D U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 5

3 - reduce no. of the largest lorries passing through.

Fin / Prof Reg 5 LH 1 Y 2 U 1 N 3 2 5 Y S D Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 4 2

Ret & Res / Café Ind LH 3 N 12 4 Y D S Average 5, 6

Have 2 retail units and considering downsizing because of rates and council/business tax which have risen above inflation. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 1 2 5

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 2 U 1 N 1 3 4 Y U U Average 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 4 3Ret Reg 22 N 1 3 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 2 4 1 1 5 5 2 1 1 5 1 1 3Res / Café Reg 7 LH 4 N 5 18 4 Y U S Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 3 5 1Ret Ind LH 1 N 8 3 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 3 2 1 5 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 1 5 2Ret Ind LH 1 N N 1 5 N 1 D D Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Bakery & Café Ind 9

FH + LH 2 N 5 3 2 2 N 3 D S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 1

Clean-liness

ectional Signs

sability access

C a acter / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

a geof leisure

ote s /guest accom

Access by car

Q12 Q13 Q14

d) i) ii) iii) iv) v) Range of shops

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

Page 134: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 135: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

FETCHAM

Q1c Type of shop Ret - Retail Shop; Fin - Financial / Professional Services; Res - Restaurant / Café; Pub - Public House / Bar; HFT - Hot food takeway; Bus - Business / Offices; Hot - Hotel / B&B etc; Others stated

Q2a About the business Nat - National multiple chain; Reg - Regional multiple chain; Ind - Independent, individual business

Q2b If part of chain, no. of outlets

Q3 Business Premises FH - Freehold; LH - Leasehold

Q4 Size of business premises 1 - Up to 500 sq ft / 46 sq m; 2 - 501-1,000sq ft / 47-93 sq m; 3 - 1,001 - 1,500 sq ft / 93-139 sq m; 4 - 1,501-5,000sq ft /139-465 sq m; 5 -Over 5,000 sq ft / 465 sq m

Q5 Upper floors at business premises (a) upper floors: Y - Yes; N - No, (b) If yes, how many?, ( c) Are these upper floors Used; Vac, (d) Used for /as O-Offices; Rt-Retail Sales; S-Storage; Rs-Residential; Other, (e) Upper floors occupied by your business, (f) If yes, which floors

Q6 Employees: F - Full time ; P - Part time; C/V - Casualties / volunteers

Q7 Vacancies: - F - Full time ; P - Part time

Q8 Time at Premise 1 - Less than 1 year; 2 - 1-2 years; 3 - 2-5 years; 4 - 5-10 years; 5 - More than 10 years

Q9 Satisfaction with premises -Y - Yes; N - No

Q10 Reason for dissatisfaction 1 - Premises too small; 2 - Premises too large; 3 - Prefer better location; 4 - Poor conditions; 5 - Inconvenient servicing; Others stated

Q11 Turnover (a) over the past year: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, (b) in the year ahead: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, ( c) - Do you think your turnover is - Above average; Average; Below Average

Q12 Future intentions (a) Intentions in the next 5 years - 1 - Remain in existing premises; 2 - Relocate elsewhere in same town/village; 3 - Relocate to another town/village in Mole Valley; 4 - Relocate outside Mole Valley; 5 - Sell business as going concern; 6 -Close business (b) If relocating - where and why ( c) If closing - why

Q13 Opiniong of town / village centre G - Good ; S - Satisfactory ; P - Poor (i) Multiple shops / chains, (ii) Independent / specilaist, (iii) Restaurants/cafes/takeaways, (iv) Pubs, (v) Services eg. banks etc, Range of shops etc

Q14 Future of town / village centres, five most important things to addressA - Seek to improve the number of national retailers; B - Seek to increase the number of speciality retailers ; C - Improve the appearance of the town / village centre ; D - Reduce crime ; E - Manage traffic congestion ; F - Provide more dwellings in the town / village centre ; G - Improve public transport to the town / village centre; H - Increase the amount of car parking; I - Improve recreational / leisure facilities;

J - Improve the marketing of the centre ; K - Highlight the centre's importance as a tourist / visitor destination; L - Increase the number of markets; M - Increase the number of festivals; N - Increase the provision of hotel / guest accommodation; O - Increase the provision of conference facilities; P - Improve cleanliness

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8 Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F P C/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Other

O Rt S Rs Other G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Takeaway Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 4 1 1 1 Y U S Average 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3Ret Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 2 3 N 1 S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3Ret Ind 2 FH 4 N 12 8 1 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 4 4 4 1 4 2 3 2 5 4 2 4 2Res/ Café Ind FH 3 N 4 4 5 Y D S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 3 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 2Ret Ind LH 3 Y U 1 N 6 2 1 5 Y D S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Policing free parking 2 5 4 1 3 Refer to QuestionnaireRet Ind FH 5 Y 1 U 1 1 Y Both 5 5 5 Y U S Average 6 Retirement 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2Ret Ind LH 1 N 5 Y S U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 3 5 3 4 4 5 1 3 3 3 1 2 1 5

Ret Ind+ LH 2 N 9 1 5 N 1 D U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5

Ret Ind LH 1 N 5 5 Y S S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 5 1 - Bank

Q14

d)

Directional Signs

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q12 Q13

Public toilets

Clean-liness

Pedes-trian

Disability access

Character / Appear

Feeling safe

Access by car Car park

Public transport Cycle

Range of shops

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

Hotels / guest accomiv) v)

Q11

i) ii) iii)

Page 136: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 137: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

BOOKHAM

Q1c Type of shop Ret - Retail Shop; Fin - Financial / Professional Services; Res - Restaurant / Café; Pub - Public House / Bar; HFT - Hot food takeway; Bus - Business / Offices; Hot - Hotel / B&B etc; Others stated

Q2a About the business Nat - National multiple chain; Reg - Regional multiple chain; Ind - Independent, individual business

Q2b If part of chain, no. of outlets

Q3 Business Premises FH - Freehold; LH - Leasehold

Q4 Size of business premises 1 - Up to 500 sq ft / 46 sq m; 2 - 501-1,000sq ft / 47-93 sq m; 3 - 1,001 - 1,500 sq ft / 93-139 sq m; 4 - 1,501-5,000sq ft /139-465 sq m; 5 -Over 5,000 sq ft / 465 sq m

Q5 Upper floors at business premises (a) upper floors: Y - Yes; N - No, (b) If yes, how many?, ( c) Are these upper floors Used; Vac, (d) Used for /as O-Offices; Rt-Retail Sales; S-Storage; Rs-Residential; Other, (e) Upper floors occupied by your business, (f) If yes, which floors

Q6 Employees: F - Full time ; P - Part time; C/V - Casualties / volunteers

Q7 Vacancies: - F - Full time ; P - Part time

Q8 Time at Premise 1 - Less than 1 year; 2 - 1-2 years; 3 - 2-5 years; 4 - 5-10 years; 5 - More than 10 years

Q9 Satisfaction with premises -Y - Yes; N - No

Q10 Reason for dissatisfaction 1 - Premises too small; 2 - Premises too large; 3 - Prefer better location; 4 - Poor conditions; 5 - Inconvenient servicing; Others stated

Q11 Turnover (a) over the past year: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, (b) in the year ahead: U - Up; D - Down; S - Same, ( c) - Do you think your turnover is - Above average; Average; Below Average

Q12 Future intentions (a) Intentions in the next 5 years - 1 - Remain in existing premises; 2 - Relocate elsewhere in same town/village; 3 - Relocate to another town/village in Mole Valley; 4 - Relocate outside Mole Valley; 5 - Sell business as going concern; 6 -Close business (b) If relocating - where and why ( c) If closing - why

Q13 Opiniong of town / village centre G - Good ; S - Satisfactory ; P - Poor (i) Multiple shops / chains, (ii) Independent / specilaist, (iii) Restaurants/cafes/takeaways, (iv) Pubs, (v) Services eg. banks etc, Range of shops etc

Q14 Future of town / village centres, five most important things to addressA - Seek to improve the number of national retailers; B - Seek to increase the number of speciality retailers ; C - Improve the appearance of the town / village centre ; D - Reduce crime ; E - Manage traffic congestion ; F - Provide more dwellings in the town / village centre ; G - Improve public transport to the town / village centre; H - Increase the amount of car parking; I - Improve recreational / leisure facilities;

J - Improve the marketing of the centre ; K - Highlight the centre's importance as a tourist / visitor destination; L - Increase the number of markets; M - Increase the number of festivals; N - Increase the provision of hotel / guest accommodation; O - Increase the provision of conference facilities; P - Improve cleanliness

Q1c Q2a Q2b Q3 Q4 Q8 Q9 Q10

a) b) c) e) f) F P C/V F P a) b) c) a) b) c) Other A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Other

O Rt S Rs Other G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P G S P

Bus / Off Ind FH 4 Y 4

U + V 1 Y 1 24 3 4 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 4 2

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 1 4 3 Y U S Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH 3 Y 1 V 1 N 1 1 5 Y U 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 4

Ret Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 N 1 1 4 Y U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Parking charges too high and need larger car park 2 3 1 4 5

Ret Reg 7 LH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 1 1 6 3 N 1, 4 U U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3

Ret Ind LH 1 N 1 3 2 5 Y D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 1 5 5 2 1 1 1 5 2 1 5

Ret Ind LH 1 N 3 N 1 D D Below 4

No passing trade.No 'Shops are here' signs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 5 1 3

Better directional signs to businesses on the other side of high st.

Fin / Prof Ind LH 1 Y 1 U 1 Y 1st floor 1 1 1 5 N

2Noisy neighbour. U U Below 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 4 1 2

Ret Ind LH 5 Y 1 U 1 Y 1st floor 1 5 Y D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 3 1 2

Ret Ind LH 1 N 1 2 5 N 3 D D Below

Not definite, consider-ing options 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3

Promote secondary parades not just high street.

Fin / Prof Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 3 2 5 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Ret Ind FH 3 Y 2 U 1 N 1 1 2 Y S D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 1 5 3 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 3

Preserve the English Village Atmosphere

Ret Ind LH 2 Y 1 U 1 N 1 1 1 N 1, 4, 5 D U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 5

Fin / Prof Ind LH 3 N N 3 9 5 Y U D Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 5Cha-rity Shp Reg

40-50 LH N 1 10 1 4 Y U U Above 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 3 4

Ret Ind 4 LH 1 N 5 Y D D Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

Advertise Bookham as user friendly with retailers that know what they are talking about and care

Ret Ind LH 2 N N 3 3 2 N 1 U U Average 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 4 2

Clean-liness

ectional Signs

Disa-bility access

C a acter / Appear

Feeling safe

Public toiletsCar park

Public transport Cycle

Pedes-trian

Quality of shops

Range of leisure

ote s /guest accom

Access by car

Q12 Q13 Q14

d) i) ii) iii) iv) v) Range of shops

Q5 Q6 Q7 Q11

Page 138: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 139: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

APPENDIX 4 Retailer Requirements – Dorking Leatherhead

Page 140: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 141: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Name Size from (sqm) Size to (sqm)

99P STORES 280 465CARLUCCIOS LTD 325 420CARPETS 4 LESS LTD 560 930COUNTRY CASUALS LTD 75 130DAYS INN HOTELS 3995 -FAT FACE LTD 140 -FRANKIE & BENNY'S 325 370FRANKIE & BENNY'S 325 410GAMBADO LTD 1300 1395GAME LTD 130 230GREGGS PLC 75 110JESSOPS LTD 75 110KIDS INC 930 -LAND OF RUGS LTD 230 465LAURA ASHLEY HOLDINGS PLC 280 745LAURA ASHLEY HOLDINGS PLC 325 560LAURA ASHLEY LTD 465 745MAJESTIC WINE WAREHOUSES LTD 185 465MORRIS PASTIES LTD 30 70NATURAL CAFE 75 150ODDBINS LTD 110 230ODDBINS LTD 75 140PAPA JOHNS (GB) LTD 75 230PETS AT HOME LTD 370 695PETS AT HOME LTD 370 930PICCOLINO 230 560PIZZA HUT (UK) LTD 295 -PONDEN MILL LTD 140 465POUNDLAND 230 650PRET A MANGER LTD 80 -PRINCESS ALICE HOSPICE 55 85RESTAURANT BAR & GRILL 280 745RIGHT PRICE LTD 160 280RSVP LTD 85 130SAKS HAIR (HOLDINGS) LTD 90 -SAVERS HEALTH & BEAUTY LTD 185 230SCOPE 70 465STARBUCKS COFFEE HOLDINGS (UK) LTD 65 170TCHIBO UK LTD 75 150TILE DEPOT 230 560TK MAXX 1395 3715WORKS PUBLISHERS OUTLET (THE) 140 230

Dorking

Page 142: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 143: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Name Size from (sqm)

Size to (sqm)

BRITISH HEART FOUNDATION 55 110BULTHAUP 120 185CARPHONE WAREHOUSE GROUP PLC (THE) 45 140DAYS INN HOTELS 3995 -DESIGN FIREPLACES (WALTON) LTD 185 280DRUCKERS CAFE PATISSERIE 75 110ESPORTA HEALTH & FITNESS CLUBS 4645 7895FLOORS-2-GO LTD 230 465GAMBADO LTD 1300 1395GREGGS PLC 75 110HALFORDS LTD 370 930HALFORDS LTD 325 930INSTORE LTD 90 370JOHNSON CLEANERS UK LTD 40 130KIDSUNLIMITED LTD 370 650LAURA ASHLEY HOLDINGS PLC 280 745LAURA ASHLEY HOLDINGS PLC 325 560LAURA ASHLEY LTD 465 745MAJESTIC WINE WAREHOUSES LTD 185 465MORRIS PASTIES LTD 30 70ONE SMALL STEP ONE GIANT LEAP LTD 65 75PETS AT HOME LTD 370 670PETS AT HOME LTD 370 930PIZZA HUT (UK) LTD 295 325POUNDLAND 230 650PRET A MANGER LTD 80 280RIGHT PRICE LTD 160 280SAKS HAIR (HOLDINGS) LTD 90 -SAVERS HEALTH & BEAUTY LTD 185 -STARBUCKS COFFEE HOLDINGS (UK) LTD 65 170SUPERDRUG STORES PLC 185 560TILE DEPOT 230 560

Leatherhead

Page 144: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 145: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

APPENDIX 5 Need and Capacity

Page 146: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 147: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 1

Population Projections

Year

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 All Zones Total

Population 2007 14,129 19,364 11,853 20,221 21,455 22,181 24,814 33,791 167,807

Population 2012 14,407 19,744 12,086 20,618 21,877 22,617 25,301 34,455 171,104

Population 2017 14,483 19,849 12,150 20,728 21,993 22,737 25,436 34,638 172,013

Population 2021 14,535 19,921 12,194 20,802 22,072 22,819 25,527 34,762 172,633

Population 2026 14,645 20,071 12,285 20,959 22,238 22,991 25,719 35,024 173,932

Change in Population 2007 - 2017

Numeric change 354 485 297 507 538 556 622 847 4,206

Percentage change 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%

Change in Population 2007 - 2026

Numeric change 516 707 433 738 783 810 906 1,233 6,125

Percentage change 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6%

Notes:Population base data from 2004 MapInfo Mid-Year Estimates. Population projections fromdwelling constrained population projections based on the Draft South East Plan housing requirements (provided by MVDC).

Page 148: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 2

Comparison Goods Expenditure (per capita)

Year Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £

20075,043 4,483 4,486 4,464 4,397 4,450 4,560 4,210

2012 6,255 5,560 5,563 5,536 5,453 5,519 5,655 5,222

2017 7,757 6,896 6,900 6,866 6,763 6,845 7,013 6,476

2021 9,215 8,192 8,196 8,157 8,034 8,132 8,332 7,693

2026 11,429 10,160 10,165 10,116 9,964 10,086 10,333 9,541

Notes:Expenditure data derived from MapInfo 2004 Local Expenditure Estimates provided in 2004 prices. Expenditure has been increased to the forecast years using 4.4% per annum as advised by MapInfo Information Brief 06/02 (Table 2).2004 Prices

Page 149: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 3

Total Comparison Goods Expenditure and Expenditure Growth

Year Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 All Zones Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m

Total 2007 71.3 86.8 53.2 90.3 94.3 98.7 113.1 142.3 750.0

Total 2012 90.1 109.8 67.2 114.1 119.3 124.8 143.1 179.9 948.4

Total 2017 112.3 136.9 83.8 142.3 148.7 155.6 178.4 224.3 1,182.5

Total 2021 133.9 163.2 99.9 169.7 177.3 185.6 212.7 267.4 1,409.8

Total 2026 167.4 203.9 124.9 212.0 221.6 231.9 265.8 334.2 1,761.6

Growth in Total Expenditure 2007 - 2012 18.9 23.0 14.1 23.9 25.0 26.1 29.9 37.6 198.4

Growth in Total Expenditure 2012 - 2017 22.2 27.1 16.6 28.2 29.4 30.8 35.3 44.4 234.1

Growth in Total Expenditure 2017 - 2021 21.6 26.3 16.1 27.4 28.6 29.9 34.3 43.1 227.3

Growth in Total Expenditure 2021 - 2026 33.4 40.7 24.9 42.3 44.3 46.3 53.1 66.7 351.8

Growth in Total Expenditure 2007 - 2026 96.1 117.1 71.7 121.8 127.3 133.2 152.6 191.9 1011.7

Notes:Expenditure per Zone is product of Population (Table 1) and Comparison Expenditure (Table 2). Special Forms of Trading (SFT) has been accounted for within the household survey and is reflected in the Comparison Goods Market Shares and Spending Pattern (Tables 4 and 5).2004 Prices

Page 150: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 4

Comparison Goods Market Shares - 2007

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8All Zones Market Share

Inside Study Area

Zone 1

Cobham 21.3% 3.2% 2.4% 0.6% 0.6% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1%

Zone 2

Bookham 1.3% 3.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6%

Fetcham 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Zone 3

B&Q Leatherhead 7.3% 5.0% 5.7% 3.8% 0.2% 1.0% 1.6% 0.0% 2.3%

Leatherhead 4.3% 12.7% 17.5% 5.3% 0.3% 2.6% 1.6% 0.1% 4.2%

Zone 4

Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

The Street, Ashtead 0.0% 0.2% 1.4% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5%

Zone 5

Other zone 5 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

Zone 6

Cranleigh 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 0.9% 0.4% 1.0%

Other zone 6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

Zone 7

Wickes, Dorking 0.0% 0.5% 0.3% 0.2% 0.5% 0.3% 2.2% 0.0% 0.5%

Dorking 0.3% 3.5% 3.3% 1.2% 8.6% 1.1% 29.2% 4.7% 7.1%

Zone 8

Other zone 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Sub TOTAL Inside 34.5% 29.6% 31.6% 15.4% 11.1% 13.3% 35.7% 5.3% 18.9%

Table 4 Continued Overleaf

Page 151: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 4 Continued

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8All Zones Market Share

Outside Study Area

Crawley 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.2% 19.5% 2.9% 12.7% 23.4% 10.7%

Epsom / Ewell 2.7% 12.1% 18.5% 32.1% 1.6% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 7.2%

Guildford 15.3% 27.1% 8.6% 7.5% 7.3% 50.1% 15.8% 8.6% 16.6%

Horsham 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 8.9% 7.5% 40.6% 11.8%

Kingston 22.3% 10.7% 14.8% 18.8% 4.3% 3.0% 6.0% 2.4% 8.4%

Reigate 1.1% 0.0% 1.2% 0.4% 20.3% 0.0% 1.4% 0.5% 3.3%

Redhill 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 1.0%

Sutton / Cheam 0.5% 1.1% 4.3% 6.8% 4.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.0% 2.2%

Central London 2.0% 0.8% 0.3% 2.4% 3.4% 2.0% 0.2% 2.9% 2.0%

Other Outside Study Area 7.9% 5.1% 8.8% 6.7% 5.7% 7.3% 5.2% 6.4% 6.4%

Internet / mail order / catalogue 13.2% 12.6% 11.8% 9.8% 14.8% 11.2% 11.5% 9.9% 11.6%

Sub TOTAL Outside 65.5% 70.4% 68.4% 84.6% 88.9% 86.7% 64.3% 94.7% 81.1%

TOTAL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Notes:These market shares have been derived from the NEMS Household Survey 2007.

Page 152: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 5

Comparison Goods Spending Pattern in Study Area - 2007

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 All Zones TotalAll Zones Market Share

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m %

Inside Study AreaZone 1

Cobham 15.1 2.8 1.3 0.6 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.0 21.6 2.9%

Zone 2

Bookham 0.9 2.8 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 4.4 0.6%

Fetcham 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.2%

Zone 3

B&Q, Leatherhead 5.2 4.3 3.0 3.4 0.2 1.0 1.8 0.0 19.0 2.5%

Leatherhead 3.1 11.1 9.3 4.7 0.2 2.5 1.8 0.2 32.9 4.4%

Zone 4

Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1%

The Street, Ashtead 0.0 0.2 0.8 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.5%

Zone 5

Other zone 5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1%

Zone 6

Cranleigh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 1.0 0.5 7.8 1.0%

Other zone 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1%

Zone 7

Wickes, Dorking 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 2.5 0.0 4.0 0.5%

Dorking 0.2 3.0 1.7 1.1 8.1 1.1 33.1 6.7 55.0 7.3%

Zone 8

Other zone 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0%

Sub TOTAL Inside 24.6 25.7 16.8 13.9 10.5 13.2 40.4 7.6 152.6 20.3%

Table 5 Continued Overleaf

Page 153: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 5 Continued

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 All Zones Total All Zones Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m %

Outside Study Area

Crawley 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 18.4 2.9 14.4 33.3 70.0 9.3%

Epsom / Ewell 1.9 10.5 9.8 28.9 1.5 0.7 0.1 0.0 53.5 7.1%

Guildford 10.9 23.5 4.6 6.7 6.9 49.4 17.8 12.2 132.1 17.6%

Horsham 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 8.8 8.5 57.8 76.9 10.3%

Kingston 15.9 9.3 7.9 17.0 4.0 3.0 6.8 3.4 67.2 9.0%

Reigate 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.4 19.1 0.0 1.5 0.7 23.1 3.1%

Redhill 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 6.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 7.6 1.0%

Sutton / Cheam 0.4 1.0 2.3 6.2 3.9 0.5 2.8 0.0 16.9 2.3%

Central London 1.4 0.7 0.2 2.2 3.2 2.0 0.3 4.1 14.1 1.9%

Other Outside Study Area 5.6 4.5 4.7 6.1 5.4 7.2 5.9 9.1 48.4 6.5%

Internet / mail order / catalogue 9.4 10.9 6.3 8.9 13.9 11.1 13.0 14.0 87.5 11.7%

Sub TOTAL Outside 46.7 61.1 36.4 76.4 83.8 85.5 72.7 134.7 597.4 79.7%

TOTAL 71.3 86.8 53.2 90.3 94.3 98.7 113.1 142.3 750.0 100.0%

Notes:These spending patterns are the product of the Total Comparison Goods Expenditure (Table 3) by the Study Area Market Shares (Table 4). The All Zones Total is the sum of the expenditure attracted to each centre/store from each zone. The All Zone Market Share is the share of the expenditure that each centre achieves from the total Study Area pot of expenditure.2004 Prices

Page 154: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 6

Comparison Goods Sales Densities of MVDC Centres - 2007

Study Area

Turnover (1) Inflow (2) Inflow

Expenditure (3) Total Turnover (4) Comparison

Sales Area (5)Current Sales

Density (6)

£m % % £m sqm net £/sqm

Dorking 55.0 5% 2.9 57.9 13,286 4,355

Leatherhead 32.9 5% 1.7 34.7 6,050 5,733

Ashtead 4.5 5% 0.2 4.7 2,163 2,168

Bookham 4.4 5% 0.2 4.6 837 5,545

Fetcham 1.4 5% 0.1 1.4 751 1,922

Turnover of MVDC Centres 98.1 5.2 103.3

Notes:(1) This is taken from Table 5 (Comparison Spending Pattern) All Zones Total column. This exlcudes the turnover achieved by B&Q in Dorking and Wickes in Leatherhead. (2) RTP have estimated that 5% of the centres turnover is derived from beyond the Study Area.(3) Inflow Expenditure is 5% as a proportion of the centres turnover.(4) This is the sum of Study Area Turnover and Inflow Expenditure.(5) Comparison Sales Floorspace has been provided by MVDC.(6) This is calculated by dividing the total turnover by the sales (net) comparison floorspace.2004 Prices

Page 155: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 7

Comparison Capacity Assessment for MVDC

2007 2012 2017 2021 2026Change 2007-12

Change 2012-17

Change 2017-21

Change 2021-26

Change 2007-26

MVDC Expenditure Retention (1)

A. Total Study Area Expenditure (£m) 750.0 948.4 1,182.5 1,409.8 1,761.6 198.4 234.1 227.3 351.8 1,011.7

B. Retention Level of MVDC Centres (%) 16.2% 16.2% 16.2% 16.2% 16.2%

C. Retained Expenditure by MVDC Centres (£m) 121.2 153.3 191.1 227.8 284.7 32.1 37.8 36.7 56.9 163.5

Expenditure Inflow (2)

D. Proportion of Turnover from Beyond Study Area (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%

E. Expenditure Inflow to MVDC Centres (£m) 6.4 8.1 10.1 12.0 15.0 1.7 2.0 1.9 3.0 8.6

MVDC Available Expenditure (3)

F. Total Available Expenditure (£m) (=C+E) 127.6 161.3 201.2 239.8 299.7 33.8 39.8 38.7 59.8 172.1

Claims on Expenditure (4)

G. MVDC Centres Turnover (£m) (=F) 127.6 127.6 127.6 127.6 127.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

H. Improvement in Sales Densities of Existing Centres (£m) 0 15.4 32.6 47.8 68.9 15.4 17.2 15.2 21.1 68.9

I. Increase in Special Forms of Trading (£m) 0 3.2 4.0 4.8 6.0 3.2 0.8 0.8 1.2 6.0

J. MVDC Residual Expenditure (£m) (5) (=F-G-H) 0.0 15.2 37.0 59.6 97.2 15.2 21.8 22.6 37.5 97.2

K. Estimated Sales Density (£/sqm) (6) 4,500 5,042 5,649 6,187 6,932

L. NET Floorspace Requirement (sqm) (7) (=J/K) 0 3,008 6,546 9,637 14,016 3,008 3,538 3,091 4,379 14,016

M. GROSS Floorspace Requirement (sqm) (8)0 4,628 10,071 14,827 21,563 4,628 5,443 4,756 6,736 21,563

Notes:1. MVDC Expenditure Retention - this is the amount of Study Area Expenditure that is spent within centres located within MVDC. We have retained the retained market share as constant in the forecast years.2. Expenditure Inflow - we have estimated that 5% of the turnover of MVDC Centres is derived from expenditure from beyond the Study Area.3. MVDC Available Expenditure - this is the sum of the MVDC Retained Expenditure and Expenditure Inflow.4. Claim on Expenditure - these comprise the current Turnover of the MVDC Centres, an allowance for improvements in Sales Densities of 2.3% per annum in the forecast years and an allowance of 2% of total expenditure at each forecast year to represent an uplift in SFT.5. MVDC Residual Expenditure - MVDC Available Expenditure less Claims on Expenditure 6. Estimated Sales Density - this is an RTP Estimate7. Net Floorspace Requirement - MVDC Residual Expenditure divided by the Estimated Sales Density.8. Gross Floorspace Requirement - this is the Net Requirement converted to Gross using a ratio of 65/352004 Prices

Page 156: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 8

Convenience Goods Expenditure (per capita)

Year Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8

£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £

20072,181 2,007 2,007 2,000 1,989 1,994 2,034 1,911

2012 2,281 2,099 2,099 2,092 2,080 2,085 2,127 1,998

2017 2,385 2,195 2,195 2,188 2,175 2,181 2,225 2,090

2021 2,472 2,275 2,275 2,267 2,255 2,260 2,306 2,166

2026 2,586 2,380 2,380 2,371 2,358 2,364 2,411 2,265

Notes:Expenditure data derived from MapInfo 2004 Local Expenditure Estimates provided in 2004 prices. Expenditure has been increased to the forecast years using 0.9% per annum as advised by MapInfo Information Brief 06/02 (Table 2).2004 Prices

Page 157: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 9

Total Convenience Goods Expenditure and Expenditure Growth

Year Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 All Zones Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m

Sub Total 2007 30.8 38.9 23.8 40.4 42.7 44.2 50.5 64.6 335.8

Deduction for SFT at 2.15% 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.4 7.2

Total 2007 30.2 38.0 23.3 39.6 41.8 43.3 49.4 63.2 328.6

Sub Total 2012 32.9 41.4 25.4 43.1 45.5 47.2 53.8 68.8 358.1

Deduction for SFT at 3.2% 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.2 11.5

Total 2012 31.8 40.1 24.6 41.7 44.0 45.7 52.1 66.6 346.7

Sub Total 2017 34.5 43.6 26.7 45.3 47.8 49.6 56.6 72.4 376.5

Deduction for SFT at 3.25% 1.1 1.4 0.9 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.4 12.2

Total 2017 33.4 42.2 25.8 43.9 46.3 48.0 54.7 70.0 364.3

Sub Total 2021 35.9 45.3 27.7 47.2 49.8 51.6 58.9 75.3 391.7

Deduction for SFT at 3.25% 1.2 1.5 0.9 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.4 12.7

Total 2021 34.8 43.9 26.8 45.6 48.1 49.9 56.9 72.8 378.9

Sub Total 2026 37.9 47.8 29.2 49.7 52.4 54.3 62.0 79.3 412.7

Deduction for SFT at 3.25% 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.6 13.4

Total 2026 36.6 46.2 28.3 48.1 50.7 52.6 60.0 76.8 399.3

Growth in Total Expenditure 2007 - 2012 1.7 2.1 1.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.7 3.5 18.0

Growth in Total Expenditure 2012 - 2017 1.6 2.0 1.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.6 3.4 17.6

Growth in Total Expenditure 2017 - 2021 1.3 1.7 1.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.8 14.7

Growth in Total Expenditure 2021 - 2026 1.9 2.4 1.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.9 20.3

Growth in Total Expenditure 2007 - 2026 6.5 8.2 5.0 8.5 9.0 9.3 10.6 13.6 70.7

Notes:Expenditure per Zone is product of Population (Table 1) and Convenience Expenditure (Table 8). We have deducted SFT at half the guidance provide by Experian in their Retail Planner Briefing Note 4.0 (Table 5.1)2004 Prices

Page 158: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 10

Convenience Goods Market Shares - 2007

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8Total Market Share

Inside Study Area

Zone 1

Sainsburys, Cobham 27.7% 8.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 11.6% 0.4% 0.0% 4.8%

Waitrose, Cobham 44.1% 1.6% 1.5% 1.2% 0.0% 7.0% 0.4% 0.0% 5.0%

Zone 2

Budgens, Fetcham 0.5% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5%

Rusts, Bookham 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Somerfield, Bookham 0.0% 17.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4%

Zone 3

Lidl, Leatherhead 0.0% 1.9% 3.6% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6%

One Stop, Kingston Road, Leatherhead 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Sainsburys, Leatherhead 0.0% 18.4% 33.5% 9.1% 0.0% 2.9% 1.2% 0.0% 6.4%

Tesco, Leatherhead 14.7% 33.3% 38.7% 24.9% 0.0% 1.5% 7.0% 0.0% 12.2%

Zone 4

Alldays, The Street, Ashtead 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.2% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.4%

Tesco, Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%

Zone 5

Marks & Spencer, Reigate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7%

Tesco, Hookwood 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 24.6% 0.0% 4.2% 1.4% 4.1%

Zone 6

Co-op, Cranleigh 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 9.4% 0.0% 1.4% 1.5%

Marks & Spencer, Cranleigh 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.6%

Sainsburys, Cranleigh 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30.9% 1.5% 3.6% 4.8%

Budgens, East Horsley 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5%

Zone 7

Marks & Spencer, Dorking 1.2% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.8%

Sainsburys, Dorking 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 0.8% 34.0% 3.4% 6.6%

Waitrose, Dorking 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 27.3% 4.9% 5.7%

Zone 8

Tesco, Broadbridge Heath / Horsham 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 4.6% 3.1% 43.4% 9.5%

Other - Inside study area 1.9% 0.8% 3.2% 0.0% 1.5% 6.4% 5.4% 5.4% 3.2%

Sub TOTAL Inside 90.1% 96.5% 85.5% 48.6% 39.0% 84.9% 87.4% 65.0% 73.2%

Table 10 Continued Overleaf

Page 159: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 10 Continued

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8Total Market Share

Outside Study Area

Asda, Burgh Heatth 0.0% 0.4% 6.6% 1.6% 4.5% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 1.8%

Morrisons, Reigate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 3.1% 0.7% 3.8%

Sainsburys, Burpham / Guildford 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 5.4% 3.1% 0.0% 1.2%

Sainsburys, Epsom 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% 19.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 2.7%

Sainsburys, Horsham 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 20.7% 4.2%

Sainsburys, Redhill 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6%

Tesco, Brooklands, Weybridge 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6%

Waitrose, Epsom 0.7% 0.4% 1.9% 19.5% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8%

Waitrose, Horley 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.9%

Waitrose, Horsham 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% 1.0%

Other - outside catchment area 3.9% 2.8% 2.8% 10.6% 10.5% 6.6% 2.7% 7.2% 6.1%

Sub TOTAL Outside 9.9% 3.5% 14.5% 51.4% 61.0% 15.1% 12.6% 35.0% 26.8%

TOTAL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Notes:(1). These market shares have been derived from the NEMS household survey 2007. Where a store outside the study area has attracted a limited market share, we have added the market shares for these centres together and included them within the 'Other - Outside study area' category.

Page 160: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 11

Convenience Shopping Patterns - 2007

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 All Zones TotalAll Zones Market Share

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m %

Inside Study Area

Zone 1

Sainsburys, Cobham 8.4 3.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.2 0.0 16.9 5.1%

Waitrose, Cobham 13.3 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 18.0 5.5%

Zone 2

Budgens, Fetcham 0.1 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 4.1 1.3%

Rusts, Bookham 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.3%

Somerfield, Bookham 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 7.4 2.2%

Zone 3

Lidl, Leatherhead 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.5%

One Stop, Kingston Road, Leatherhead 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0%

Sainsburys, Leatherhead 0.0 7.0 7.8 3.6 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 20.2 6.2%

Tesco, Leatherhead 4.4 12.7 9.0 9.9 0.0 0.7 3.4 0.0 40.1 12.2%

Zone 4

Alldays, The Street, Ashtead 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.4 0.4%

Tesco, Craddocks Parade, Ashtead 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.3%

Zone 5

Marks & Spencer, Reigate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.7%

Tesco, Hookwood 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 10.3 0.0 2.1 0.9 13.5 4.1%

Zone 6

Co-op, Cranleigh 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 4.1 0.0 0.9 5.3 1.6%

Marks & Spencer, Cranleigh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.5 2.1 0.6%

Sainsburys, Cranleigh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.8 2.3 16.4 5.0%

Budgens, East Horsley 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.6%

Zone 7

Marks & Spencer, Dorking 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.3 0.7%

Sainsburys, Dorking 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 16.8 2.2 20.5 6.2%

Waitrose, Dorking 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 13.5 3.1 18.2 5.5%

Zone 8

Tesco, Broadbridge Heath / Horsham 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.0 1.5 27.4 31.4 9.6%

Other - Inside study area 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.6 2.8 2.7 3.4 11.1 3.4%

Sub TOTAL Inside 27.2 36.7 19.9 19.2 16.3 36.8 43.1 41.1 240.3 73.1%

Table 11 Continued Overleaf

Page 161: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 11 Continued

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 All Zones Total

£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m %

Outside Study Area

Asda, Burgh Heatth 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.6 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 5.7 1.7%

Morrisons, Reigate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 0.0 1.5 0.5 12.4 3.8%

Sainsburys, Burpham / Guildford 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.3 1.5 0.0 4.0 1.2%

Sainsburys, Epsom 0.0 0.0 0.7 7.6 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 8.9 2.7%

Sainsburys, Horsham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 13.1 13.8 4.2%

Sainsburys, Redhill 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 1.5%

Tesco, Brooklands, Weybridge 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.7%

Waitrose, Epsom 0.2 0.1 0.4 7.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 2.8%

Waitrose, Horley 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.1 0.9%

Waitrose, Horsham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.8 1.2%

Other - outside catchment area 1.2 1.1 0.7 4.2 4.4 2.8 1.3 4.5 20.2 6.1%

Sub TOTAL Outside 3.0 1.3 3.4 20.4 25.4 6.5 6.2 22.1 88.4 26.9%

TOTAL 30.2 38.0 23.3 39.6 41.8 43.3 49.4 63.2 328.6 100.0%

Notes:These spending patterns are the product of the Total Convenience Goods Expenditure (Table 9) by the Study Area Market Shares (Table 10). The All Zones Total is the sum of the expenditure attracted to each centre/store from each zone. TheAll Zone Market Share is the share of the expenditure that each centre achieves from the total Study Area pot of expenditure.2004 Prices

Page 162: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 12

Convenience Capacity Assessment for MVDC

2007 2012 2017 2021 2026Change 2007-12

Change 2012-17

Change 2017-21

Change 2021-26

Change 2007-26

MVDC Expenditure Retention (1)

A. Total Study Area Expenditure (£m) 328.6 346.7 364.3 378.9 399.3 18.0 17.6 14.7 20.3 70.7

B. Retention Level of MVDC Stores (%) 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1%

C. Retained Expenditure by MVDC Stores (£m) 135.0 142.4 149.6 155.6 164.0 7.4 7.2 6.0 8.4 29.0

Expenditure Inflow (2)

D. Proportion of Turnover from Beyond Study Area (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%

E. Expenditure Inflow to MVDC Stores (£m) 7.1 7.5 7.9 8.2 8.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 1.5

MVDC Available Expenditure (3)

F. Total Available Expenditure (£m) (=C+E) 142.1 149.9 157.5 163.8 172.6 7.8 7.6 6.3 8.8 30.5

Claims on Expenditure - Turnover of Stores (4)

G. MVDC Stores Turnover (£m) (=F) 142.1 142.1 142.1 142.1 142.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

H. Improvement in Sales Densities of Existing Stores (£m) 0 4.3 8.8 12.4 17.1 4.3 4.4 3.7 4.7 17.1

I. MVDC Residual Expenditure (£m) (5) (=F-G-H) 0.0 3.5 6.7 9.3 13.4 3.5 3.2 2.7 4.1 13.4

J. Estimated Sales Density (£/sqm) (6) 10,000 10,304 10,616 10,874 11,204

K. NET Floorspace Requirement (sqm) (7) (=I/J) 0 339 628 859 1,200 339 289 232 341 1,200

L. GROSS Floorspace Requirement (sqm) (8)0 521 965 1,322 1,847 521 444 357 525 1,847

Notes:1. MVDC Expenditure Retention - this is the amount of Study Area Expenditure that is spent within stores located within MVDC. We have retained the retained market share as constant in the forecast years.2. Expenditure Inflow - we have estimated that 5% of the turnover of MVDC Stores is derived from expenditure from beyond the Study Area.3. MVDC Available Expenditure - this is the sum of the MVDC Retained Expenditure and Expenditure Inflow.4. Claim on Expenditure - the Turnover of the Stores and an allowance for improvements in Sales Densities of 0.6% per annum in the forecast years is deducted from MVDC Available Expenditure.5. MVDC Residual Expenditure - MVDC Available Expenditure less Claims on Expenditure 6. Estimated Sales Density - this is an RTP Estimate7. Net Floorspace Requirement - MVDC Residual Expenditure divided by the Estimated Sales Density.8. Gross Floorspace Requirement - this is the Net Requirement converted to Gross using a ratio of 65/352004 Prices

Page 163: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 13

Benchmark Turnover of Foodstores in MVDC - 2007

Gross Floorspace (1)

Net Sales

Floorspace (2)% Convenience

Floorspace (3)

Convenience Sales Floorspace (4)

Average Sales

Density (5)Benchmark

Turnover (6)

sqm sqm % sqm £/sqm £m

Benchmark Turnover of Foodstores within MVDC (1)

Fetcham

Budgens, Fetcham 709 372 95% 353 5,000 1.8

Bookham

Rusts, Bookham - 315 95% 299 5,000 1.5

Somerfield, Bookham 741 412 95% 391 5,419 2.1

Leatherhead

Lidl, Leatherhead - 1,063 95% 1010 2,616 2.6

One Stop, Kingston Road, Leatherhead - 138 95% 131 5,000 0.7

Sainsburys, Leatherhead 3,947 2,621 74% 1940 9,613 18.6

Tesco, Leatherhead 5,007 3,240 63% 2041 13,716 28.0

Ashtead

Alldays, The Street, Ashtead - 161 95% 153 5,000 0.8

Tesco, Craddocks Parade, Ashtead - 260 95% 247 13,716 3.4

Dorking

Marks & Spencer, Dorking - 432 100% 432 10,787 4.7

Sainsburys, Dorking 2,515 945 74% 699 13,716 9.6

Waitrose, Dorking - 816 87% 710 11,697 8.3

Stand Alone Store

Tesco, Hookwood 8,603 5,880 63% 3705 13,716 50.8

Total Benchmark Turnover of MVDC Foodstores 132.8

Notes:(1) Floorspace data from IGD and MVDC. This excludes small stores that fall within the convenience category and would be picked up as 'other' within the household survey.(2) Net sales floorspace is provided by IGD or has been estimated using a 65% net to gross ratio.(3) Percentage of convenience sales area of all foodstores are either RTP estimates or company averages provided by Grocery Retailing 2007 published by Verdict. MapInfo definition of 'convenience expenditure' used to inform floorspace splits.(4) This is the convenience floorspace in the stores using the percentage calculated at (3).(5) Average Sales Density is provided by Verdict/Retail Rankings/RTP Estimates and has been adjusted to a pure convenience goods average to reflect the goods basis approach.(6) Product of convenience floorspace and average sales density2004 Prices

Page 164: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 14a - Scenario A - Inflow Constant

Overtrading/Undertrading on a MVDC Wide Basis - 2007

Foodstores within MVDC CentresTotal Turnover Derived from

Survey Data (1)

Allowance for

Inflow (2) Total Turnover (3) Benchmark

Turnover (4) Difference (5)

£m £m £m £m £m

Fetcham 4.1 0.2 4.4 1.8 2.6

Bookham 8.4 0.4 8.9 3.6 5.2

Leatherhead 62.2 3.3 65.4 49.9 15.5

Ashtead 5.8 0.3 6.1 4.2 1.9

Dorking 40.9 2.2 43.1 22.6 20.5

Stand Alone Store (Tesco Hookwood) 13.5 0.7 14.2 50.8 -36.6

MVDC District Wide Overtrading/Undertading 135.0 7.1 142.1 132.8 9.2

Notes:(1) This is the turnover of all foodstores in MVDC, divided into the main centres together with Tesco Hookwood, as derived from the household survey (Table 11)(2) Inflow is assumed to be 5% as a proportion of turnover of all stores to represent inflow from beyond the study area.(3) Sum of survey derived turnover and inflow(4) Sum of benchmark turnover of all foodstores in MVDC, divided into the main centres together with Tesco Hookwood, as derived from company averages (Table 13)(5) This is the difference between the survey derived turnover plus inflow (i.e. Total Turnover) and the Benchmark Turnover according to company averages. A positive output indicates overtrading compared to company averages, whilst a negative figure indicates undertrading. The final row of the table indicates the position on a MVDC wide basis2004 Prices

Page 165: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 14b - Scenario B - Adjusted Inflow for Tesco Hookwood

Overtrading/Undertrading on a MVDC Wide Basis - 2007

Foodstores within MVDC Centres

Total Turnover Derived from

Survey Data (1)

Allowance for

Inflow (2) Total Turnover (3) Benchmark

Turnover (4) Difference (5)

£m £m £m £m £m

Fetcham 4.1 0.2 4.4 1.8 2.6

Bookham 8.4 0.4 8.9 3.6 5.2

Leatherhead 62.2 3.3 65.4 49.9 15.5

Ashtead 5.8 0.3 6.1 4.2 1.9

Dorking 40.9 2.2 43.1 22.6 20.5

Stand Alone Store (Tesco Hookwood) 13.5 37.3 50.8 50.8 0.0

MVDC District Wide Overtrading/Undertading 135.0 43.7 178.6 132.8 45.8

Notes:(1) This is the turnover of all foodstores in MVDC, divided into the main centres together with Tesco Hookwood, as derived from the household survey (Table 11)(2) Inflow is assumed to be 5% as a proportion of turnover of all stores (EXCEPT TESCO HOOKWOOD) to represent inflow from beyond the study area. Under this scenario we are assuming that Tesco Hookwood is achieving its company average turnover hence its turnover as derived from inflow will be 72.8%. (3) Sum of survey derived turnover and inflow(4) Sum of benchmark turnover of all foodstores in MVDC, divided into the main centres together with Tesco Hookwood, as derived from company averages (Table 13)(5) This is the difference between the survey derived turnover plus inflow (i.e. Total Turnover) and the Benchmark Turnover according to company averages. A positive output indicates overtrading compared to company averages, whilst a negative figure indicates undertrading. The final row of the table indicates the position on a MVDC wide basis2004 Prices

Page 166: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 15

Convenience Capacity Assessment for MVDC Incorporating Overtrading

2007 2012 2017 2021 2026

Scenario A

Residual Expenditure for MVDC 0.0 3.5 6.7 9.3 13.4

Overtrading for MVDC for MVDC Stores 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2

Reisdual Expenditrure and Overtrading Turnover 9.2 12.7 15.9 18.6 22.7

Estimated Sales Density (£/sqm) 10,000 10,304 10,616 10,874 11,204

NET Floorspace Requirement (sqm) 922 1,233 1,496 1,707 2,023

GROSS Floorspace Requirement (sqm) 1,418 1,897 2,301 2,626 3,112

Scenario B

Residual Expenditure for MVDC 0.0 3.5 6.7 9.3 13.4

Overtrading for MVDC for MVDC Stores 45.8 45.8 45.8 45.8 45.8

Reisdual Expenditrure and Overtrading Turnover 45.8 49.3 52.5 55.1 59.3

Estimated Sales Density (£/sqm) 10,000 10,304 10,616 10,874 11,204

NET Floorspace Requirement (sqm) 4,580 4,784 4,942 5,072 5,289

GROSS Floorspace Requirement (sqm) 7,047 7,360 7,603 7,803 8,136

Notes:This table provides the capacity assessment if the additional 'overtrading' calculated in Tables 14a and 14b is added to the residual expenditure from Table 12. The typical floorspace densities are idendical to those used in Table 12. These capacity calculations are for information purposes only if the Council wish to treat 'overtrading' as part of quantitative need.2004 Prices

Page 167: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Table 16Expenditure Growth - Leisure

2007 (£m)

2017 (£m)

Growth 2007-2017 (£m)

MVDC Market Share (%)

MVDC (£m)

Restaurants, cafes & bars 270.16 337.58 67.42 25.40 17.12

Accommodation services 49.57 61.95 12.37 29.80 3.69

Hair & personal grooming 21.11 26.37 5.27 29.80 1.57

Recreation & sport 21.09 26.35 5.26 22.90 1.21

Cinemas, theatres, museums 47.45 59.30 11.84 15.70 1.86

Games of chance 36.91 46.12 9.21 0.50 0.05

TOTAL 396.72 495.72 99.00 21.80

Page 168: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 169: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

APPENDIX 6 Glossary

Page 170: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March
Page 171: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

Glossary Benchmark turnover: Turnover of a store if it were to trade at the company average. Colliers CRE Zone A retail rents: Rental values for the top 609 centres across the UK. Values relate to a hypothetical shop unit of optimum size and configuration in the prime pitch, and are expressed as £ per sq m per annum. Comparison shopping: Non-food products such as clothing, furniture and electrical goods for which some comparison is normally made before purchase. Convenience shopping: Goods such as food, newspapers and drinks, which tend to be purchased regularly. FOCUS: Commercial property information supplier, providing resources such as building reports, retailer requirements, photographs and tenant and company information. GOAD defined key attractors: 27 national multiple retailers which have been identified as being the most likely to improve the consumer appeal of the centre. Linked trip: Combining a visit to a supermarket with a trip to use other shops and services in the town/district/local/village centre. Local centres: Small groups of shops and services in smaller towns providing a limited range of facilities and serving a local catchment area. These are defined in the Local Plan. Local Development Framework: Part of the statutory development plan which sets out the Council’s detailed land use policies to be used in determining planning applications. Will replace the Local Plan. Local Plan: Part of the statutory development plan which sets out the Council’s detailed land use policies to be used in determining planning applications. Will be replaced by the Local Development Framework. National multiple retailer: A retailer that is part of a network of nine or more outlets. Primary shopping frontage: The most important shopping area of the city centre, usually characterised by having the highest rents and pedestrian flow and national retailer representation. Retailer requirements: an indication of which national multiple retailers are seeking retail floorspace within a centre and how much floorspace they require (sqm). Secondary shopping frontage: Shopping areas of secondary importance. Supplementary planning document: Document used to provide further detail on policies and proposals, part of the Local Development Framework. Town centre: Principal centres in a local authority’s area, providing a range of facilities and services. These are defined in the Local Plan. Viability: A measure of a city centre or a district centre’s ability to attract investment for maintenance, improvement and adaptation to the changing needs of the local population. Vitality: A measure of how busy a city centre or district centre is. Yields: A benchmark that the property market uses to assess the comparative attractiveness of different shopping centres. It is a ratio of rental income to capital value

Page 172: Mole Valley District Council MOLE VALLEY TOWN ......by Zone (Weighted) Mole Valley Town, District, Local and Village Centres Study Page 64 Weighted: for Roger Tym & Partners March

and is expressed in terms of the open market rent of a property as a percentage of the capital value