MOIMS Area Report N. Peccia ESA R. ThompsonBNSC. MOIMS Reportp. 2CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Attendance to the MOIMS Meetings Diversity FactorSM&C6.

MOIMS Area Report

N. Peccia ESAR. Thompson BNSC

MOIMS Report p. 2CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007

Attendance to the MOIMS Meetings

MOIMS PlenaryNASA ESA BNSC CNES ASI CSA SC14

16th Jan 07 12 7 4 5 2 1 1Total 33

SM&C NAV DAI / IPRNASA ESA BNSC CNES ASI CSA NASA ESA JAXA CNES ASI SC14 NASA ESA CNES BNSC CSA

16th Jan 07 14 3 3 3 1 1 25 3 2 1 1 1 1 9 6 2 2 2 12Total 46

17th Jan 07 22 3 2 2 1 1 31 4 2 1 1 1 1 10 8 3 3 2 1 17Total 58

18th Jan 07 13 2 2 3 1 1 22 3 3 1 1 1 4 13 2 1 3 1 7

7 1 1 1 10Total 52

19th Jan 07 13 2 2 3 1 2 23 3 3 1 1 8 8 3 3 14Total 45

MOIMS PlenaryNASA ESA BNSC CNES ASI CSA SC14

20th Jan 07 11 4 3 2 1 1Total 22

Diversity Factor SM&C 6 AgenciesNAV 5 AgenciesDAI / IPR 4 Agencies


MOIMS DAI WG Report

DATA ARCHIVE INGESTION WGGoal: Develop a CCSDS/ISO standard for a Submission Information Package (SIP) for transfer and validation of information submitted to an archive Goal: Determine the need to update the OAIS Reference Model for the 5-year reviews

Working Group Status: Active __X_ Idle ____Working Group Summary Situation:

Good progress on draft SIP red book;

OAIS reference model will get a minimal update

comment:

PROBLEMCAUTIONOKstatus:

Good progress on draft SIP red book;

OAIS reference model will get a minimal update

comment:



MOIMS DAI WG Report

Working Group Summary progress: A list of issues with the draft Producer Archive Interface Standard

(PAIS) Red Book were reviewed and most were resolved. Updates needed to the XML schema, for describing data objects to be transferred to the archive, have been identified. Preliminary mapping of PAIS / SIP attributes to the XFDU standard have been identified, but completing this is the major technical work remaining. The outline for the Green Book has been agreed.

Review of comments received on the need to update the OAIS reference model have lead to a decision to do a minimal update to clarify some terms and concepts.

Schedule (major deliverables only) Draft PAIS Red Book, with Green Book, ready for formal review: 30 June 2007 Updated OAIS reference model, ready for formal review: 10 October 2007

Charter updated


MOIMS DAI WG Report

CROSS-AREA TECHNICAL ISSUES We will look to adopt guidance on XML schema expression as put

forward by the CCSDS XML SIG.

Other Issues and concerns Registration Fees for meetings

Uniformly negative response WGs

Allow individual WGs to meet as needed, at agency facilities, as long as they have multiple agency participation. Perhaps hold Plenary every 2 years, and allow cross-support meetings as needed, but encourage telecons, videocons (e.g.,megameeting)

Resolution In response to the 5-year ISO review of the OAIS reference model,

verify that we can put the updated document into ISO for review as a final draft international standard (FDIS). If not, clarify what would be the ISO document status


MOIMS IPR WG Report

Information Packaging and Registries (IPR) Working GroupThe purpose of this Working Group is to: Collect use cases from the space operations community and develop requirements

for XML data packaging: Develop a set of recommendations that specify an extensible framework for

packaging data and metadata Oversee the development of at least two implementations of the packaging

framework and associated with usability and interoperability tests in many areas of space data systems

Based on testing experience and requirements from various Space Data and Operations Groups, establish extensible registry / repository architectures that leverage the more widely based registry work such as ebXML and UDDI.

Develop specific Registry/Repository standards that support the data packaging registry/repository requirements focusing on the support of XML Schemas and associated XML objects

Xcomment:


Xcomment:



MOIMS IPR WG Report

XFDU Schedule: Draft Green Book Issue 1 for Panel Review 1st March 2007 Panel Review Comments Due 1st April 2007 XFDU RB RIDs from Agency Review Due 1st May 2007 XFDU RIDs Responses Review Telecon 1st June 2007 XFDU BB / GB CESG Submissions 15th June 2007 Resolution of any Agency Blue Book Comments 1st Oct 2007XML Schema Registries Schedule: Use Cases and Requirements on CCSDS Usage of XML Schema

Registries 15th March 2007 White Papers and Agency Prototypes on CCSDS Schema Registries

1st October 2007

Draft White Book(s) on CCSDS XSD Registry 1st Jan 2008 XML Schema Registry White Book and Prototypes 1st July 2008 XML Schema Red Book/Green Book/Reference Implementation for

CESG Review 1st Mar 2009

If significant RIDS are received on the XFDU Red Book this schedule may be impacted


MOIMS IPR WG Report

ISSUES IPR has received resource commitments from member agencies to develop

an XML Schema Registry Recommendation and implementations which are needed both for XFDU deployment and coordination of the rapidly growing XML schema volume within the agencies.

The IPR WG agrees that a common Registry / Repository Service Architecture is needed within CCSDS and will provide full support for a CCSDS wide effort to establish a preliminary version of this Architecture.

However, due to critical needs of IPR member agencies for an XML Schema registry the IPR support of the Architecture effort is available for the period from 1st Feb 2007 to 31st May 2007 at which time those resources will be applied to the development of a CCSDS Recommendation for an XML Schema Registry / Repository that specialize the CCSDS Registry/Repository Service Architecture.

The resulting interfaces and data structures can then be used to validate/modify the CCSDS Registry / Repository Service Architecture


MOIMS NAV WG Report

NAVIGATION WG

Goal: Development of standards for interagency exchange of data required for spacecraft tracking and attitude/orbit determination.

Xcomment:


Xcomment:



MOIMS NAV WG Report

SUMMARY TECHNICAL STATUS Jan 2007 accomplishments Completed review / update of Working Group Charter according to

current understandings Completed review of ADM Red Book 1.4 updates and resolved a

number of open issues. Completed review of TDM Red Book 2.0 early RID’s and a few open

issues. Completed discussion of NDM/XML Red Book 1.2 and XML related

issues Completed high level plan for the ADM Prototyping effort (GFSC,

CNES, JAXA) Completed high level plan for the TDM Prototyping effort (JPL, DLR,

ESA) Completed extensive and detailed discussions of unit discrepancies

in the group’s Recommendations (ADM, ODM, TDM) Completed discussions with the ISO TC20/SC14 Liaison Dave

Finkleman and colleagues on the topic of standards for collaborative operations in Earth orbit. ODM updates to accommodate these needs are in draft status.


MOIMS NAV WG Report

CROSS-AREA TECHNICAL ISSUES XML Harmonization: More emphasis on harmonization of XML issues

across the CCSDS as a whole is highly desirable (e.g., common data elements that pervade space operations). It would be good for the XSG SIG/WG to address this in due course.

OTHER ISSUES AND CONCERNS

CCSDS Strategic Planning Better communication / coordination above and beyond the WG and Area are

needed (e.g., we have on several occasions experienced changes in requirements –XML- that necessitated additional effort and caused delays in documents).

Registration fees for big meetings?: Mixed opinion. The group felt that by changing the meeting schedule to a

single “combined Area” meeting per year, with the individual Areas meeting one more time in smaller venues, the agency burden to support two meetings a year could be reduced. The requirement for coordination between Navigation and other Areas, as is facilitated by a large meeting, has been relatively low.

Scheduling of Meetings: More flexibility for working group for arranging meetings would be good (1

big / 1 smaller & more flexible). A smaller Area-oriented meeting could better avoid holiday weeks, reduce logistics issues, avoid working on Saturdays, reduce weather risks, etc.


MOIMS NAV WG Report

ISO TC20 / SC13 + SC14 Collaboration We are engaged in ongoing discussion with SC14 / WG3 regarding new requirements on ODM.

Discussions in these Winter meetings were collegial and positive. Several agreements were reached, but there is still some internal resistance in WG.

Orbit Data Messages (ODM) updates to accommodate SC14/WG3 needs are in draft status (Issue by March 15, 2007, Reviewed by April 1st, 2007) A new message be added to the Orbit Data Message Standard, name to be determined. The message include elements of data from which canonical TLE’s may be constructed. The message include a 6x6 covariance matrix abstraction. Metadata include covariance solve-fors, but values beyond the 6x6 abstraction need not be

provided Information that cannot be described precisely enough be included in optional fields and not in normative requirements

Risk: 2 competing standards for orbit descriptions between the 2 ISO Subcommittees. Resolving the internal differences is a high priority.

Idea of TC20/SC14/WG3 suspending their effort on ISO/AWI 26885.TO DATE, UNACCEPTABLE TO TC20/SC14

SC14/WG3 Liaison still lists the following outstanding issues: Should there be two additional message types in 22644 or just one? Should there be one standard, ISO 22644, or two mutually consistent standards, one

emphasizing content and the format for that content, the other emphasizing elements of information?

Should TLE’s be institutionalized at all?


MOIMS NAV WG Report

ISO TC20 / SC13 + SC14 Collaboration - Conclusions

CCSDS Nav WG is following the Activity Plan developed cooperatively with the SC14/WG3 at Rome in 2006

Good progress is being made Some issues which must resolved remain, thus technical

collaboration should continue Multiple standards for orbit data description are not in the interest of

SC14, SC13, the ISO overall, or the potential user community (agencies and other satellite operators)

Current ISO Standard for orbit data description is ISO 22644, Orbit Data Messages; it is being modified by the Nav WG to accommodate SC14/WG3 requirements Spring 2008 Release enhanced ODM version (Pink Book) for

CCSDS review Summer 2008 Conduct prototype exercises Fall 2008 Establish and publish enhanced ODM Blue Book

ISO/AWI 26885 work should be suspended, freeing the SC14/WG3 to work on the many other elements of their Technical Program


MOIMS NAV WG Report

RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION 1

The Navigation WG is thankful to the CESG / CMC for making firm announcements about date / location of upcoming meetings. This helps us all plan better.

RESOLUTION 2 The Navigation WG is pleased to express appreciation to NASA for their

excellent hosting of this workshop, the AIAA for the excellent logistics support, and El Pomar Foundation for the use of the superb Penrose House facilities.


MOIMS SM&C WG

Number of attendees

Average

Attendance to the

SM&C Meetings


Proposed (WG chair) Goals for this Workshop

Identification of common SM&C approach with NASA within CCSDS

Achieved: see next slide

Trade-off between Messaging Protocols (e.g. AMS, JMS, etc.)

Achieved: SM&C architecture allows use of several messaging systems

Successful initial demonstration of SM&C Prototype Achieved

Agree on way forward on draft high priority RBs towards a target Agency Review in 2nd half 2007

Achieved: see next slide


Common SM&C Approach with NASA

Very constructive participation

Agreed new books organisation

Agreed contents of SM&C Protocol

Agreed schedule for BBs publication Messaging Abstraction Layer BB: end Dec 2007 Common Services BB: Mar 2008 Core Services BB: Mar 2008


XTCE

Awaiting for OMG approval

Started prototype mapping of Space Shuttle operational database to XTCE.

High confidence that XTCE would work for future programs (e.g. CEV)

MB update available in Q2/2007


Resolutions

The SM&C resolve to request approval of the new WG charter (update of book organisation and schedule)

The SM&C resolve to request confirmation to CESG that, after demonstration of SM&C prototype V1 in Rome and SM&C prototype V2 in Colorado Springs, the CCSDS requirements for prototyping are fulfilled


Open Points / Matter of Interest

SM&C Charter No response from CESG

CCSDS Web Site Improvement Add statistics on books Book planning information Missing procedure/tool to allow submission and recording of problems

encountered by users of CCSDS standards Map missions and usage of specific standards (see IOAG network infusion

progress)


Digital Repository Audit and Certification BOF

Goal Obtain CCSDS / ISO approval of a standard that establishes the criteria that a

repository / archive must meet to be designated an ISO Trusted Digital Repository.Mailing list moims-rac set up, 103 members alreadyBoF meeting held, with 26 participants (including telecon & videocon)

Agencies: BNSC, CNES, ESA, NASA Others:

Center for Research Libraries (CRL) U North Carolina Lockheed Martin UK Digital Curation Centre (DCC) CCLRC, UK UOL, Brazil Smithsonian Institution Archives Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), U Columbia IPCSR U of California, Office of the President NARA/ U Maryland Dutch National Library (KB), Netherlands Humboldt University, Berlin Charter agreed by BoF


Digital Repository Audit and Certification BOF

Issues / Actions CESG / CMC will investigate the best way to undertake parallel reviews

in CCSDS and ISO (e.g. creation of new ISO work item) CMC / ISO Liaison will investigate guidelines for ISO accreditation and

certification

MOIMS Area Report N. Peccia ESA R. ThompsonBNSC. MOIMS Reportp. 2CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Attendance to the MOIMS Meetings Diversity FactorSM&C6.

Documents

xml data packaging

packaging data

thompsonbnsccesgcmc

formal review

review of comments

year iso review

data objects

packaging framework