Modification of the ocean PHILLS hyperspectral imager for the International Space Station and the HyGEIA program Michael R. Corson, Jeffrey H. Bowles, Wei Chen, Curtiss O. Davis, Kiera H. Gallelli, Daniel R. Korwan Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC Clinton E. Dorris Boeing NASA Systems, Houston, TX August 27, 2003
17
Embed
Modification of the ocean PHILLS hyperspectral imager for the International Space Station and the HyGEIA program Michael R. Corson, Jeffrey H. Bowles,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Modification of the ocean PHILLS hyperspectral imager
for the International Space Stationand the HyGEIA program
Michael R. Corson, Jeffrey H. Bowles, Wei Chen, Curtiss O. Davis, Kiera H. Gallelli, Daniel R. Korwan
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC
Clinton E. DorrisBoeing NASA Systems, Houston, TX
August 27, 2003
The HyGEIA Program
• HyGEIA: Hyperspectral sensor for Global Environmental Imaging and Analysis
• Program objectives:– Adapt the NRL ocean PHILLS
(Portable Hyperspectral Imager for Low Light Spectroscopy) for flight in the International Space Station
– Produce hyperspectral images of the Earth at 25 m and 130 m Ground Sample Distance (GSD)
– Achieve 200 to 1 Signal-to-Noise Ratio for water and forest scenes
– Produce data products of value to the Navy and commercial community
– Provide a further link between airborne and space hyperspectral imaging
• HyGEIA 25 m GSD comparable to 20 m AVIRIS
The HyGEIA Team
• Naval Research Laboratory– PHILLS hyperspectral imager under development since 1994– Development of environmental data products of interest to Navy– Development of algorithms to remove the effects of the
atmosphere and water reflection, produce ocean product and do data compression
• Boeing Space Utilization– Knowledge of requirements, interfaces, and procedures for
Shuttle or International Space Station flights, liaison with NASA– Test and Qualification of hardware for flight on Shuttle Station– Development and test of software to interface with Station– Liaison with NASA managers and technical personnel
• NASA– Space Shuttle for delivery of PHILLS system to Station– Space Shuttle for return of data and PHILLS system– Station personnel for installation, changing lenses, changing data
storage hard drives, troubleshooting– Control and communications links
• Sponsors:– Office of Naval Research– Space Test Program– Navy TENCAP
a) Bottom type and b) bathymetry derived from an AVIRIS image of Tampa Bay, FL using automated processing of the hyperspectral data. Lee, Z., et al., J. Geophys. Research, 106(C6), 11,639-11,651, 2001.
Navigation channel
Seagrass Beds
Overview of PHILLS
• PHILLS is a pushbroom hyperspectral imager, optimized for environmental characterization of the coastal zone– Designed for aircraft operation– 400 to 1000 nm spectral range– Designed for 200 to 1 Signal to
Noise Ratio– Meter-class GSD from aircraft
altitudes– 1.2 nm (minimum) spectral bins
• Normally binned by 4 or 8 for 4.5 nm or 9 nm spectral bins
– Offner spectrometer with very low smile and keystone distortion
• Less than 0.1%– Backside-illuminated Si CCD, 12
micron square pixels for high quantum efficiency in the blue wavelengths
PHILLS imager next to 18” ruler
Primary COTS components:
C-mount video lens designed for 400 to 1000 nm (Schneider)
HyperSpecTM spectrograph (American Holographic, now Agilent Technologies)
1024 x 1024 CCD camera (Pixelvision)
PHILLS Radiometric Calibration
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000Counts
Rad
ianc
e (W
m-2
ste
r-1 m
icro
n-1)
450 nm 550 nm 650 nm 850 nm
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Channel
(W m
-2 s
ter-1
mic
ron-1
)/C
ount
s
Example of PHILLS Radiometric Calibration using the calibration sphere. a) Linear fits to Ocean PHILLS radiometric calibration data for four selected wavelengths. b)Typical values of the radiometric calibration gain for the left (sample # 488, top curve) and right (sample # 517, bottom curve) side of the 1024 sample CCD. The spectral channels that correspond to the response curves shown in a) are marked with their legend labels.
C. O. Davis, et al. (2002), Optics Express 10:4, 210--221.
Example of PHILLS Radiometric Calibration using the calibration sphere. a) Linear fits to Ocean PHILLS radiometric calibration data for four selected wavelengths. b)Typical values of the radiometric calibration gain for the left (sample # 488, top curve) and right (sample # 517, bottom curve) side of the 1024 sample CCD. The spectral channels that correspond to the response curves shown in a) are marked with their legend labels.
C. O. Davis, et al. (2002), Optics Express 10:4, 210--221.
PHILLS data for Great Bay Region (010731 Run15seq03)
• The image is 1000 pixels wide and 1024 pixels long. The spatial resolution is 1.8 meters.
• The data was processed to Rrs using laboratory
calibration data, and the Tafkaa atmospheric correction.
• “X” marks the location of spectra shown below.
X
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9Wavelength (microns)
Ref
lect
ance
X 1
04 PHILLS-1
Ground Truth ASD
Physical Configuration of the WORF
The WORF enclosure
Speed of sub-Stationpoint ~ 7,250 m/s
• Window Transmission
The WORF windowAssembly, 20” diameter,
~6” thick
Destiny Module Window
K. Scott, S. Biggar, D. Eppler, E. Zalewski, L. Brownlow, and K. Lulla, “International Space Station Destiny Module Window Optical Characterization” submitted to the 30th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment, Honolulu, HI, November 2003.
Modeled Signal to Noise Ratio at 25 m GSD
• The pushbroom operation of the PHILLS imager transfers naturally to use on the Space Station
• Model using spectral radiance above the atmosphere from Modtran, 5% surface albedo, 45 deg solar elevation, rural 5 km aerosols– 5% albedo represents water and forest scenes
• Assume nadir viewing, 380 km altitude, 180 mm focal length collecting lens operating at f/4, 10 nm spectral bins
Modeled Signal to NoiseRatio is less than goalof 200 to 1
Required frame rateof 290 frames per secondis beyond capabilityof camera
Ground Motion Compensation Required for
25 m GSD Imaging• Ground Motion Compensation (GMC) reduces the apparent speed
of the scene past the line of sight
Modeled Station PHILLS S/N at 130 m GSD
• Spectral radiance above the atmosphere from Modtran, 5% surface albedo, 45 deg solar elevation, rural 5 km aerosols
• Assume 380 km altitude, 35 mm focal length collecting lens operating at f/4, 10 nm spectral bins
Modeled Signal to NoiseRatio for nadir viewingis less than goalof 200 to 1
Frame rate for nadir viewingof 56 frames per secondis within capability of camera,but with significant spectralSmear
Anticipate using available GMC
Gimbaled Tip/Tilt Mount in WORF
• Tip / tilt mount provides ground motion compensation and cross track pointing
Incident Light Cone
Destiny ModuleWindow
HyGIEA Computer
Mounting Surface
Additional Modifications required for HyGEIA
• Adding a mechanical shutter, controlled by the HyGEIA computer, to acquire dark frames
• Building a power converter to power camera and gimbal mount from 28 vdc WORF supply
• Writing interface and control software to receive imaging scripts from ground, power up and power down HyGEIA hardware, receive time and attitude information from Station, send health and welfare information to Station, execute scripts, process and store data
• Typical imaging sequence– Power hardware on for warmup– Receive time from Station and set computer clock– Receive attitude from Station and compute pointing offsets– Initialize pointing and acquire dark frame– Image ground swath– Acquire dark frame– Write image data to hard disk– Process and compress image data using NRL Optical Real time
Adaptive Spectral Identification System (ORASIS)
PHILLS Implementation on Station
• Block diagram of PHILLS in the WORF
WORF PEHB(Payload Ethernet
Hub / Bridge)
POINTING SYSTEM
WORF STRUCTURE
PHILLS SensorSHUTTER
PHILLS POWER SUPPLY
HOSTCOMPUTER
WORF SSPCM(Solid-State PowerController Module)
WORF AAA(Avionics AirAssembly)
Power
Power
PowerPower
Air
Power
H/W
H/W
Encoder Data
Data
Data
Data(TTL for shutter)
MOUNTINGASSEMBLY
H/W
HyGEIA ProvidedISS Provided
H/WMOUNTING ASSEMBLY
H/W
Power
WORF RIC(Rack Interface
Controller)
Modeled Access of Ground Scenes• Modeled number of accesses for 20 m GSD nadir, 20 m GSD with +/- 30 deg off axis
pointing, and 100 m GSD with +/- 30 deg off axis pointing– Time period June 1, 2002 through August 31, 2002
Location 100 m GSDnadir
20 m GSDnadir
20 m GSD+- 30 deg
Bermuda 26 21 84
Camp Pendleton, CA 27 20 86
Chesapeake Bay, MD 22 27 106
English Channel 166 143 257
Key West, FL 11 7 67
Lake Okeechobee, FL 10 4 62
Melbourne Harbor, Australia 20 13 65
Monterrey Bay, CA 21 14 90
Straits of Gibraltar, Spain 19 9 85
Tampa Bay, FL 19 16 64Note: access valid when any part of ground swath intersects any part of scene
Status and Conclusions
• PHILLS Hardware and Software modifications are under way
• Modeled performance meets the goal of 200 to 1 Signal to Noise Ratio from 400 to 700 nm for water and forest scenes– Substantial effort required to provide gimbal platform
• Cross track pointing required for localized ground scenes
• 25 m GSD hyperspectral data from space can be compared to 20 m AVIRIS data– Hope to provide additional link between airborne and space