Top Banner
MLP Conference 2013 Spark Spectrometry for Determination of Carbon Equivalent Minneapolis, MN April 24-25, 2013 Presented by: Ian Cleary, Acuren
42

MLP Conference 2013

Feb 22, 2016

Download

Documents

orsen

MLP Conference 2013. Spark Spectrometry for Determination of Carbon Equivalent. Presented by: Ian Cleary, Acuren. Minneapolis, MN April 24-25, 2013. ABSTRACT. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MLP Conference 2013

MLP Conference 2013

Spark Spectrometry for Determination of Carbon Equivalent

Minneapolis, MNApril 24-25, 2013

Presented by:

Ian Cleary, Acuren

Page 2: MLP Conference 2013

ABSTRACT

• As pipeline maintenance and repair activities proceed at a faster and faster pace, the quality control of those repairs must keep pace

• Laboratory testing of steel chemistry is a major bottleneck in the process of welding to active pipelines

• Spark optical emission spectroscopy offers a fast and reliable way to get accurate chemistry results in the field 2

Page 3: MLP Conference 2013

SOME HISTORY

• Strome, Alberta (February 19, 1985 – 8:00 pm)

• Workers caught in the unplanned ignition of leaking LNG from a pipeline they were working on

• Fireball 40m across

3

Page 4: MLP Conference 2013

COLD CRACKING

• The leak was caused by cold cracking at a weld in the pipe

• Typically occurs at the toe of the weld, in the HAZ (Heat Affected Zone)

• Metal in HAZ cools rapidly after welding, which tends to harden the steel and make it more susceptible to hydrogen induced cold cracking.

4

Page 5: MLP Conference 2013

COLD CRACKING

• How hard the steel will become after welding is related to its chemistry

• Several elements affect hardenability• Most important elements: carbon and

carbon-equivalent (manganese, silicon, nickel, chromium)

5

Page 6: MLP Conference 2013

CARBON EQUIVALENT (CE)

• Low carbon = less likely to harden excessively

• High carbon = more likely to harden excessively

• Calculating carbon equivalent CE) attempts to estimate how much each element is “worth” in terms of resultant hardenability

6

Page 7: MLP Conference 2013

CARBON EQUIVALENT

• In early days, pipeline industry had few regulations around steel chemistry.

• Carbon content guidelines were in place, but other elements were often ignored

• Steel chemistry results not stored for future generations

7

Page 8: MLP Conference 2013

CARBON EQUIVALENT

• Welding on these pipes presents potential for serious hazard, if not handled correctly

• Regulations now require that carbon equivalent of the existing pipe be known before welding can occur

8

Page 9: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING CARBON EQUIVALENT

• Currently, one way CE can be determined is by testing pipeline shavings in the laboratory.

• Small amount of metal shavings are collected from a pipe where welding will happen.

9

Page 10: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING CARBON EQUIVALENT

10

Page 11: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING CARBON EQUIVALENT

• Shavings sent back to Acuren laboratory where they are analyzed

• Problem: Process takes time (transport + testing + backlog)

• With hundreds of samples coming in from hundreds of locations, chemical analysis is a major bottleneck in the pipeline maintenance process

11

Page 12: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING CARBON EQUIVALENT

• Acuren intends to introduce a new method for quickly determining carbon equivalent in the field.

12

Page 13: MLP Conference 2013

PORTABLE TESTING

• A few portable material identification technologies exist, but most have serious limitations.

• For example: Positive Material Identification (PMI) is unable to detect carbon

13

Page 14: MLP Conference 2013

PORTABLE TESTING

• Our solution: Spark Optical Emission Spectrometry (Spark OES)

• Acuren plans to mobilize spark OES to eliminate the testing bottleneck

14

Page 15: MLP Conference 2013

SPARK OES

• Each element has a characteristic emission line

• Spark OES measures chemical composition of metal by igniting a tiny portion of it with a high voltage electric spark

• Machine detects emission lines with two sensors: a light optic and an ultraviolet (UV) optic.

15

Page 16: MLP Conference 2013

SPARK OES

• Wavelengths mapped to characteristic emission lines of each element

• Machine compares intensity of each emission to a standard, determining the concentration of each element within the sample

16

Page 17: MLP Conference 2013

SITE PREPARATION

• First step (most important): surface preparation

• Surface must be clean and flat• Spark OES is highly sensitive – any

amount of grease, dust, or contamination will cause incorrect results

17

Page 18: MLP Conference 2013

SITE PREPARATION

• Acuren’s operators trained in proper surface prep procedures:1) Surface buffed down with grinding wheel2) Grinding wheel replace with fresh one3) Surface polished to ensure no contaminants remain

• Aluminum oxide or zirconium oxide disks must be used instead of silicon carbide to prevent carbon contamination.

18

Page 19: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING

• Head of probe has a detachable adapter that is the working end of the spark machine

• To take a reading, adapter is held against the surface of the sample

• Operator presses the trigger• Spark is emitted from an electrode within

the adapter

19

Page 20: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING

• Spark penetrates a few hundred μm into the surface and ignites the metal

• Surface must be flat so that plasma is contained within the adapter

20

Page 21: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING

• UV spectrum detected in head of probe• Ordinary light spectrum transmitted by

fiber optic through probe cable and into main housing of the spark unit

• Longest fiber optic cable that can be used is eight meters (past that the light signal becomes degraded with loss of results)

• Intensities of the wavelengths are detected and results analyzed by a proprietary algorithm 21

Page 22: MLP Conference 2013

TESTING

22

Page 23: MLP Conference 2013

ANALYSIS & CALIBRATION

• Analysis algorithm relies on an automated calibration procedure: “iCalization” or “iCal”

• “iCal” works by testing an iCal reference standard – a piece of metal of precisely known composition – at the beginning of a shift, after transportation, or after cleaning

23

Page 24: MLP Conference 2013

ANALYSIS & CALIBRATION

• iCal builds up a library of readings of this standard material that allows machine to compensate for changes in temperature and humidity, vibrating during transport, and minute differences in component placement after cleaning

• Adapter thoroughly cleaned after 50 uses• Argon gas is used to flush the machine of

water vapor and oxygen before each test.24

Page 25: MLP Conference 2013

ANALYSIS & CALIBRATION

• To ensure accuracy of readings, a second metal of known composition (the control standard) is tested every time the machine is set up

• Unlike iCal the control standard was chosen because composition is very similar to the pipeline that will be analyzed

• Second calibration allows operator to determine if spark testing unit is reading accurately in range of interest 25

Page 26: MLP Conference 2013

PIPELINE TESTING

• Acuren has dedicated three of its four TXC03 spark testing units to carbon equivalent evaluation of pipelines digs.

• These three machines have been fine tuned to give the most accurate possible results in the expected composition ranges of existing pipes

26

Page 27: MLP Conference 2013

PIPELINE TESTING

27

Page 28: MLP Conference 2013

EXPECTED COMPOSITIONS

Overall C Mn Si Cu Ni Cr Mo V Nb B

Min 0.10 0.60 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.005 0.005 0.001

Max 0.30 1.60 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.050 0.070 0.001

28

Page 29: MLP Conference 2013

EXPECTED COMPOSITIONS

• Therefore the dedicated spark testing units will yield high accuracy results on any existing line, with special attention to the old pipe.

29

Page 30: MLP Conference 2013

TX03 ACCURACY (IDEAL CONDITIONS)

30

C C (air) Si Mn P SConc. Level (ppm)

Precision

50 10 20 10

100 10 10 10 20 10

500 20 20 10 10 20 30

1000 50 50 20 10 50 20

3000 100 100 40 20 300

5000 120 120 70 60

10000 150 150 120 120

20000 440 440 150 200

Page 31: MLP Conference 2013

TC03 ACCURACY (IDEAL CONDITIONS)

31

Cr Mo Ni Cu Nb V W BConc. Level (ppm)

Precision

50 10 3 10 2

100 20 10 10 10 20 10 4

500 20 10 10 20 20 20 50

1000 20 20 10 20 20 20 80

3000 30 20 40 40 30 50

5000 50 50 40 60 60 50 80

10000 70 120 40 100 100 100 180

20000 80 160 250 120 120 200 300

Page 32: MLP Conference 2013

ON SITE TESTING

• Size and weight of the spark machines is a limitation– Each machine has dedicated truck and crew– Each unit mounted on hand truck secured to

back of crew cab vehicle– Deploying unit is two-person job, rolling the

truck down a ramp onto the ground with the help of a winch

– Once on ground, machine can be wheeled to edge of excavation ditch

32

Page 33: MLP Conference 2013

ON SITE TESTING

• Eight meter cable often allows main housing of machine to remain outside ditch

• Once powered up the machine is tested on the control standards to verify proper operation and calibration

• If test fails the machine is recalibrated with iCal

• If iCal fails repeatedly, machine is taken back to shop for examination 33

Page 34: MLP Conference 2013

ON SITE TESTING

• Each spark test crew consists of an operator and experienced non-destructive examination (NDE) technician who know the client’s procedures and requirements

• NDE technician performs magnetic particle inspection and ultrasonic testing of proposed test area to ensure polishing is done according to client regulations

34

Page 35: MLP Conference 2013

ON SITE TESTING

• Polishing is performed with 120 grit and will go no deeper than 5-8% of nominal wall thickness

• When appropriate test area is located, operator prepares surfaces and performs test

• Single spark test consists of at least three readings in same small area

35

Page 36: MLP Conference 2013

ON SITE TESTING

36

Page 37: MLP Conference 2013

ON SITE TESTING

• Operator checks burn marks left by machine as well as consistency of readings to determine if burns were good

• Good = black with small white spot at center

• Bad = grey or white

37

Page 38: MLP Conference 2013

ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES

• Optics must have operating temp. of 36°C– Unit has built in heating system– Extreme cold weather can increase time taken

for instrument warming– Acuren’s spark testing machines will be

contained within insulated boxes with electric heating pads

38

Page 39: MLP Conference 2013

ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES

• Primary screen– Stops working in extreme

cold conditions– Machine will need a tent

to keep warm and dry while shielding the screen from glare

– TX03 comes with app for iPad that allows operator to see results in real time without leaving ditch.

39

Page 40: MLP Conference 2013

CONCLUSIONS

• Spark spectrometry can give fast, accurate results in the field

• No longer need to send samples back to lab

• Report is printed in PDF format at site.

40

Page 41: MLP Conference 2013

CONCLUSIONS

• Our lab tests show that spark spectrometry can give very consistent readings from one measurement to the next.

• With proper calibration and surface preparation, spark spectrometers are a portable way to get results:– Repeatable– Precise– Accurate

41

Page 42: MLP Conference 2013

MLP CONFERENCE 2013

SPARK SPECTROMETRY FOR DETERMINATION OF CARBONEQUIVALENTSPresented by Ian Cleary, Acuren

42