MIPS 2017- Scoring: Explanation and Estimation Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative and The Southern New England Practice Transformation Network (SNE PTN) MIPS 2017- Scoring:

CMS Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative and

The Southern New England Practice Transformation Network (SNE PTN)

MIPS 2017- Scoring: Explanation and Estimation 2/7/2017 and 2/10/2017

2

Determine eligibility status

Pick Your Pace for the 2017 Transition Year

Choose to report as an individual or a group

Review available data submission methods

Visit the QPP website shopping cart and select measures for Quality and Improvement Activities

Confirm your EHR’s certification year and review associated Objectives and Measures

Review

2

Adapted from: CMS. “The Merit-based Incentive Program.” November 2016. PowerPoint presentation

Explain the scoring methods proposed for the Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, and Advancing Care Information performance categories for the 2017 Transition Year

Apply the scoring methodology to a test practice example and calculate a MIPS performance score

Interpret the resultant MIPS performance score with respect to proposed payment adjustment categories

Agenda

3

Example of 2017 Full Year Participation – Primary Care Clinician

4

Quality Measures CostImprovement

ActivitiesAdvancing Care

Information

Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control (>9%) (outcome measure)

N/A

TCPI Participation (high-weighted)

E-Prescribing

Falls: Risk AssessmentHealth Information

Exchange

Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization

Provide Patient Access

Breast Cancer ScreeningSecurity Risk

Analysis

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Medication Reconciliation (performance

score)

Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and

Cessation Intervention

Assumptions: • Small practice: 1 MIPS

eligible clinician• EHR certification: 2014• Patient panel: 1,700• Participating in TCPI • All quality measures

have benchmarks• Quality measures will

be submitted through a registry and qualify as end-to-end electronic submissions


Performance Category: Quality Measures (60%)

• Not submitting performance data for a measure will receive 0 points

• If no benchmark exists or case volume is not met – measure will receive 3 points

• Clinicians receive 3 to 10 points on each quality measure based on performance against benchmarks– Must also have sufficient case volume (≥

20) AND

– Data completeness met (50% of possible data submitted)

5



6

Source: CMS. “2017 Quality Benchmarks.” December 29, 2016.

• Benchmarks presented in deciles, points awarded within each decile

• Separate benchmarks for the different data submission methods

Decile Number of Points Assigned for 2017 MIPS Performance Period

Below Decile 3Decile 3Decile 4Decile 5Decile 6Decile 7Decile 8Decile 9

Decile 10

3 points3 – 3.9 points4 – 4.9 points5 – 5.9 points6 – 6.9 points7 – 7.9 points8 – 8.9 points9 – 9.9 points

10 points

Topped out measures: performance rates historically have been high and may be scored differently in future years.

• Bonus points are available for either of the following:

1. Submitting an additional high-priority measure

o 2 points for each additional outcome and patient experience measure

o 1 point for each additional high-priority measure

2. Using CEHRT to submit measures to registries or CMS

o 1 point for submitting electronically end-to-end


7



8

DescriptionHigh

Priority (Y/N)

OutcomeMeasure

(Y/N)

Case Minimum Met (Y/N)

Points Based on

Performance

Total Possible Points

Bonus Points for High Priority

Bonus Points for

CEHRT

Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control (>9%)

Y Y Y 4 10 0 (required) 1

Falls: Risk Assessment Y N Y 3 10 1 1

Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization

N N Y 8 10 0 1

Breast Cancer Screening N N Y 7 10 0 1

Colorectal Cancer Screening N N Y 6 10 0 1

Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention

N N Y 9 10 0 1

Total Points 37 60 1 6

Total Quality Performance Category Score =(Points earned on required 6 quality measures) + (bonus points)

Maximum number of points(37+1+6)/60 = 73 points

Performance Category: Cost (0%)

• No reporting requirement –assessed through Medicare claims data

• CMS will provide feedback on how you performed in 2017 but it will not affect your 2019 payment adjustment

9

Source: CMS. “The Merit-based Incentive Program.” November 2016. PowerPoint presentation

Performance Category: Improvement Activities (15%)

10

• 92 improvement activities are available

• Total points available = 40

– Small, rural, underserved practices• Medium Weight Activity = 20 points

• High Weight Activity = 40 points

– Large practices• Medium Weight Activity = 10 points

• High Weight Activity = 20 points

– Participants in certified PCMH = 40 points


Performance Category: Improvement Activities (15%)

11

Activity Activity Weight Total Possible Points Total Score

TCPI Participation High 40 40

Total Points for Improvement Activities 40

Total Quality Performance Category Score =

Total number of points scored for completed activitiesTotal maximum number of points

(40/40)*100 = 100 points

• Can earn up to 155% but score will be capped at 100%

• Base Score = 50%– Required to receive a score in this category

– Submit yes/no and ≥ 1 in numerator

• Performance Score = Up to 90%– Based on performance rate for each measure

• Bonus Score = Up to 15%– 5% bonus for reporting to one of four Public

Health and Clinical Data Registry reporting measures

– 10% for using CEHRT to report certain improvement activities

12

Performance Category: Advancing Care Information (25%)


Performance Category: Advancing Care Information (25%)

13

Adapted From: CMS. “The Merit-based Incentive Program.” November 2016. PowerPoint presentation

14

Performance Category: Advancing Care Information (25%)Measure Type Measure Name Met (Y/N) Score Relative Weight Total Score

Base Score

e-Prescribing Y

100% 50% 50%Health Information Exchange Y

Provide Patient Access Y

Security Risk Analysis Y

Performance Score Medication Reconciliation Completed for 1500/1700

patients**9% - 9%

Total Advancing Care Information Performance Category Score(Base Score) + (Performance Score) + (Bonus Score) = 50% + 9% + 0%

59%

**To calculate the performance score divide the numerator by the denominator to get the measures performance rate. Cross reference the performance rate with the table to the left to determine your percentage score 1500/1700 = 0.88 * 100 = 88 9%

Performance Rates for Each Measure Worth Up to 10%

Performance Rate 1-10 = 1%Performance Rate 11-20 = 2%Performance Rate 21-30 = 3%Performance Rate 31-40 = 4%Performance Rate 41-50 = 5%

Performance Rate 51-60 = 6%Performance Rate 61-70 = 7%Performance Rate 71-80 = 8%Performance Rate 81-90 = 9%Performance Rate 91-100 = 10%

How do I calculate my final score for Transition Year 2017?

15


How do I calculate my final score for Transition Year 2017?

Performance Category

Performance Category Score

or Rate

Category Weight

Estimated Points Earned

Quality 73 60% 43.8

Cost 0 0% 0

Improvement Activities

100 15% 15

Advancing Care Information

59 25% 14.8

Estimated MIPS Final Score

Estimated MIPS Final Score =43.8 + 0 + 15 + 14.8

73.6

16

Final Score

Payment Adjustment

≥ 70 points

• Positive adjustment• Eligible for exceptional

performance bonus –minimum of additional

0.5%

4 – 69 points

• Positive adjustment• Not eligible for exceptional

performance bonus

3 points

• Neutral payment adjustment

0 points

• Negative payment adjustment of -4%

• 0 points = does not participate

Adapted from: CMS. “Quality Payment Program Final Rule MLN Connects Call.” November 2016. PowerPoint presentation

Determine eligibility status

Pick Your Pace for the 2017 Transition Year

Choose to report as an individual or a group

Review available data submission methods

Visit the QPP website shopping cart and select measures for Quality and Improvement Activities

Confirm your EHR’s certification year and review associated Objectives and Measures

Apply the scoring methodology for the 4 performance categories

Interpret the final calculated score

Summary

17


QUESTIONS?

For additional questions please reach out to [email protected]

18

mailto:[email protected]

Appendix

19

Improvement Activities Eligible for Advancing Care Information Bonus Score

20

Source: CMS. “MIPS Performance Categories: Advancing Care Information & Improvement Activities.” December 13, 2016. PowerPoint presentation

MIPS 2017- Scoring: Explanation and Estimation Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative and The Southern New England Practice Transformation Network (SNE PTN) MIPS 2017- Scoring:

Documents