Top Banner

of 23

Minwei_1_AA in a Full Watercut Range

Jan 06, 2016

Download

Documents

Minwei Sun

Gas hydrate anti-agglomeration in rocking cells
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • An effective Hydrate Anti-agglomerant at Full Range of Watercuts

    May 14-15 2012 RERI Annual Workshop Reservoir Engineering Research Institute

    Minwei Sun

  • Gas hydrates

    2

    Methane Molecule

    Hydrate Crystal

    Ice-like crystalline molecular complexes

    Form from a mixtures of water and natural gas

    Serious problem in most deepwater operations

    A large gas hydrate plug formed in a subsea hydrocarbon pipeline. from Petrobras (Brazil)

  • Sub-cooling and hydrate inhibitors

    3

    Also low dosage (< 1 wt%)

    Form slurry instead of plug

    Effective at high sub-cooling

    When operating @ 4 C

    Pressure Sub-cooling

    50 bar 11 C

    100 bar 16 C

    150 bar 18 C

    200 bar 20 C

    Thermodynamic inhibitors (THIs)

    Large quantity, 10 ~ 60 wt% of water

    Kinetic inhibitors (KIs)

    Delay hydrate formation or decelerate hydrate growth

    Low dosage (~1 wt%)

    Ineffective @ high sub-coolings (>10 C)

    Anti-agglomerants (AAs)

  • Offshore crude oil production

    4

    offshore-technology

    Gulf of Mexico, 1984-2009

    Source: US Energy Information Administration

    Shallow < 1000 ft

    Deep 1000~4999 ft

  • High pressure (150 bar), low temperature (~4 C)

    BY WEIGHT: ~20% Methane

    60,000 barrels/day

    5

    Deepwater Horizon oil spill, 2010

  • Limitations of current AAs

    Effective at low watercuts, but NOT at high watercuts (50%)

    Toxicity (especially quaternary ammonium salts)

    Cost (dosage ~ 1.0 wt% in water)

    Objectives

    Effective AA in a wide watercut range Flowlines in deepwater

    Oil capture in deepwater

    Low toxicity

    Low dosage

    6

    Motivations & objectives

  • Instrument: New setup purchased from PSL (Germany), two testing rocking cells, up

    to 200 bar

    Surfactants: A special AA

    PVP-10: Polyvinylpyrrolidone with MW ~10000, common kinetic inhibitor

    Rh: rhamnolipid, bio-surfactant as AA

    2C-75: a quaternary ammonium salt, suggested by Shell

    Systems: 10 ml liquid + 10 ml gas in sapphire cells, closed system

    Methane/n-octane/water

    Methane/n-octane/brine, brine: 4 wt% NaCl

    7

    Methane hydrate tests

  • 8

    Setup RCS-2

  • 9

    Setup RCS-2

  • Closed cell, P ~150 bar, T from 20 C, -2 C/hr to 1 C, kept @ 1 C for 2 hr before ramping to 20 C @ rate of 4 C/hr Hydrate formation temp: ~13C . Dissociation temp: 12 C. Hydrate fraction ~50%

    10

    Methane/n-octane/water/AA, 50% watercut, 0.2 wt% AA

    Ball movement in the cell due to AA effect

    Viscosity increase due to high hydrate

    content

    Hydrate formation

    Hydrate dissociation Pressure (bar)

    Temp. (C)

    Ball running

    Time (msec)

  • 11

    Closed cell, P ~ 150 bar, T from 20 C, -2 C/hr to 1 C, kept @ 1 C for 2 hr before ramping to 20 C @ rate of 4 C/hr apparent plugging. Hydrate fraction ~75%

    Methane/n-octane/water/AA, 70% watercut, 0.2 wt% AA

    Pressure (bar)

    Temp. (C)

    Ball running

    Time (msec)

  • 12

    Right picture taken 15 minutes after the left picture by keeping the cell still at 1 C Red circles show the position of stainless steel ball.

    No plugging

    70 % watercut @ 1 C, kept still

    Time = 15 minutes Time = 0

  • 13

    Closed cell, 50 bar methane, raise P to 160 bar by nitrogen, T from 20 C, -2 C/hr to 1 C, kept @ 1 C for 2 hr before ramping to 20 C @ rate of 4 C/hr. Hydrate fraction: ~63%

    Methane/nitrogen/n-octane/water/AA, 70% watercut, 0.2 wt% AA

    Pressure (bar)

    Temp. (C)

    Ball running

    Time (msec)

  • Closed cells, P ~ 90 bar, T from 20 C, -2 C/hr to 2 C, kept @ 2 C for 2 hr before ramping to 20 C @ rate of 4 C/hr (cell 1, 0.2 wt% AA, cell 2, 0.2 wt% PVP10) Hydrate formation temp: 9 C and 7.2 C. Dissociation temp: 3 C and 10.2 C Hydrate fraction in cell 1: ~70%

    Ball movement in the cell due to AA effect

    Ball without movement due to plugging

    Hydrate formation Hydrate dissociation

    14

    Methane/water/AA, 100% watercut, 0.2 wt% AA

    Pressure (bar)

    Temp. (C)

    Ball running

    Time (msec)

  • 15

    AA in methane/n-octane/water systems

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    20 40 60 80 100

    AA

    do

    sage

    (w

    t% in

    wat

    er)

    Watercut (%)

    Other inhibitors at 50% watercut: PVP-10 1.0 wt%, kinetic inhibition to 7 C subcooling Rh 1.0 wt%, ineffective AA 2C-75 1.0 wt%, ineffective AA

    (o) Stable dispersion

    (x) Plugging

  • Gulf of Mexico, 3.5 wt%

    16

    Salinity distribution in various waters

  • 17

    AA in methane/n-octane/brine systems

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    20 40 60 80 100

    AA

    do

    sage

    (w

    t% in

    wat

    er)

    Watercut (%)

    Brine: 4 wt% NaCl

    (o) Stable dispersion

    (x) Plugging

  • 18

    AA 30% watercut

    0.2wt% surfactant 50% watercut

    0.5wt% surfactant 70% watercut

    0.5wt% surfactant

    Special AA ---- 52.8 3.7 14.8 1.5

    2C-75 155.2 11.0 124.2 13.6 212.7 50.6

    Rh 1253.9 88.7 494.3 35.0 385.3 97.8

    Emulsion size

    Smaller emulsion size Higher effectiveness in AA

  • 19

    CMC measurement (UV absorption)

    Enolic form Stay in micelle Absorption ~ 312 nm

    0

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    300 310 320 330 340 350 360

    Ab

    sorb

    ance

    Wavelength (nm)

    100ppm

    70ppm

    50ppm

    30ppm

    15ppm

    10ppm

    7.5ppm

    5ppm

    CMC ~ 10 ppm

  • 20

    Proposed mechanism

    Aqueous phase

    2000 ppm CMC

    Hydrate formation

    Dielectric constant at 273k Water ~ 88 Methane hydrate ~ 58

    Aqueous phase

  • Our special AA is effective at 0.2 wt% in methane/oil/water systems, outperforming PVP-10, 2C-75 and Rh.

    For the hydrate fraction less than 63%, our special AA is effective in the full watercut range. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time an AA is reported to be effective for a watercut above 50%.

    Our special AA is also effective at 0.4 wt% in methane/oil/brine systems at 4 wt% salinity in the full watercut range.

    21

    Conclusions

  • Deliverables and future work

    22

    Two reports will be delivered to members this year.

    Midterm report in Q1 2012

    Full report in Q3 2012

    Future work

    Improve the understanding of the mechanism

    Investigate the effectiveness in crude oil systems

    Perform the 24-hour shut-in tests

    Perform flow testing

  • Acknowledgements

    RERI member companies

    RERI colleagues

    23

    Reservoir Engineering Research Institute (RERI) Palo Alto, CA, USA

    http://www.rerinst.org thermodynamics of hydrocarbon reservoirs and production

    gas injection processes fractured and layered reservoirs

    flow assurance (asphaltenes and gas hydrates)