1 Minutes of the 113 th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on. 28 th May, 2018 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. All the members are present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No. 518 to 520 dated 15.05.2018 were discussed following decisions were taken:- Item No.[1] Environment Clearance for proposed Sand Minor Mineral at Dadyana Block/AMB B-8, ML Area-2.85 Ha, Village Dadyana and District- Ambala by Sh. Devender Sharma, S/o Sh. Gauri Shankar Vashishta, Lastly the case was taken up in the 112 th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and the case was deferred. In the today’s meeting the reply dated 08.05.2018 submitted by the project proponent was considered. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] As per “Office memorandum” dated 24.12.2013 of MoEF & CC, in case of river sand mining project since the lease area 2.85 Ha, mining activity shall be done manually then how the diesel is required? [2] The project proponent should submit location and layout/ topology of the area indicating the distance from bridge and embankment. [3] How the project proponent would ensure that no in-stream mining would take place? [4] How the project proponent would ensure that the mining operations will not intersect groundwater table so that no natural water course/water body would be obstructed due to any mining operations?. [5] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water for dust suppression and sprinkling to conserve water. Has the project proponent identified any source of treated water? [6] The project proponent should submit NOC/approved conservation plan from Forest Department. [7] How would the project proponent ensure that the depth of mining should be restricting to 3 meter so that water level is not exposed? [8] How the project proponent would reclaim the area concerned and reclamation plan of the mining site should be submitted. [9] The project proponent should submit the topography of the mine area to ensure that leasing of mine does not result into a cluster situation. In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded to project proponent provided they submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days.
15
Embed
Minutes of the 113th meeting of State Environment Impact ...environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/...Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111, Gurgaon,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Minutes of the 113th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 28th May, 2018 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
All the members are present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 518 to 520 dated 15.05.2018 were discussed following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environment Clearance for proposed Sand Minor Mineral at Dadyana
Block/AMB B-8, ML Area-2.85 Ha, Village Dadyana and District-
Ambala by Sh. Devender Sharma, S/o Sh. Gauri Shankar Vashishta,
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the case was deferred.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 08.05.2018 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] As per “Office memorandum” dated 24.12.2013 of MoEF & CC, in case of river
sand mining project since the lease area 2.85 Ha, mining activity shall be done
manually then how the diesel is required?
[2] The project proponent should submit location and layout/ topology of the area
indicating the distance from bridge and embankment.
[3] How the project proponent would ensure that no in-stream mining would take
place?
[4] How the project proponent would ensure that the mining operations will not
intersect groundwater table so that no natural water course/water body would be
obstructed due to any mining operations?.
[5] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water for dust suppression and
sprinkling to conserve water. Has the project proponent identified any source of
treated water?
[6] The project proponent should submit NOC/approved conservation plan from
Forest Department.
[7] How would the project proponent ensure that the depth of mining should be
restricting to 3 meter so that water level is not exposed?
[8] How the project proponent would reclaim the area concerned and reclamation plan
of the mining site should be submitted.
[9] The project proponent should submit the topography of the mine area to ensure
that leasing of mine does not result into a cluster situation.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded to project proponent provided
they submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days.
2
It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all
the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[2] Environment Clearance for construction of Sewage Treatment Plant
(4.0 MLD) at Village-Kithwari, Tehsil-Palwal, District-Palwal,
Haryana by Public Health Engineering Department.
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the case was deferred.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 24.05.2018 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed by the Aurhotity that:
[1] The project proponent should submit the plan to segregate bio-degradable and
non-biodegradable waste of the incoming sewage to the plant.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and Environment Clearance would be accorded to project
proponent provided they submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised
observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply
the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the
Environment Clearance letter shall be issued.
Item No.[3] Environment Clearance for Expansion of Commercial Colony on the
land measuring 2.9125 acres in the revenue estate of Village Maidawas,
Sector-67, Gurugram- Manesar urban Complex by M/s Martial
Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the case was deferred. The reply submitted by the PP is as under:
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 15.05.2018 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. The project proponent has submitted the revised water balance
diagram while reducing the demand from 259 KLD to 227 KLD.
After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the standard conditions in practice.
Item No.[4] Environment Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor
Mineral Mines at “Karanpur Block PKL B-3” over an area of 8.23 ha
with production capacity of 3.9 Lakhs TPA near Village Karanpur,
Tehsil-Pinjore, District-Panchkula (Haryana) by Sh. Sushil Kumar S/o
Sh. Mam Chand,
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the case was deferred. The reply submitted by the PP is as under:
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 08.05.2018 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed by the Authority that:
3
[1] As per “Office memorandum” dated 24.12.2013 of MoEF & CC, in case of river
sand mining project since the lease area 8.23 Ha, mining activity shall be done
manually then how the diesel is required?
[2] The project proponent should submit location and layout/ topology of the area
indicating the distance from bridge and embankment.
[3] The project proponent should submit NOC/approved conservation plan from
Forest Department.
[4] How would the project proponent ensure that the depth of mining should be
restricting to 3 meter that water level is not exposed?
[5] How the project proponent would ensure that no in-stream mining would take
place?
[6] How does project proponent ensure that water from washing of wheels may be
done efficiently & minimum water is consumed? What is location of Water
trough?
[7] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water for dust suppression and
sprinkling to conserve water. Has the project proponent identified any source of
treated water?
[8] The project proponent should submit the plan to ensure no natural water
course/water body would be obstructed due to any mining operations or dumping
of the materials.
[9] How the project proponent would reclaim the area concerned and reclamation plan
of the mining site should be submitted.
[10] The project proponent should submit the topography of the mine area to ensure
that leasing of mine does not result into a cluster situation.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded to project proponent provided
they submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days.
It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all
the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[5] Environment Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Colony located
at Village-Badshahpur, District- Gurugram Haryana by M/s Sai Aaina
Farms Pvt. Ltd.,
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the case was deferred. The reply submitted by the PP is as under:
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 08.05.2018 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. The project proponent has submitted the details of
requirement of water for visitors and parking plan.
4
After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the standard conditions in practice.
Item No.[6] Environment Clearance for proposed Commercial Colony at Sector-65,
Gurgaon, Manesar Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s Wellworth
Project Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the Authority decided to defer this case and to depute Sh. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC
to visit the site and submit the report at the earliest possible.
As per the site visit report submitted by the member, It was concluded that
the excavation had been done after obtaining prior Environmental Clearance in 2009.
There is no construction / construction activity at site at present.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 11.05.2018 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. The project proponent has submitted the revised water balance
diagram while reducing the demand from 253 KLD to 224 KLD along with the complete
area statement showing proposed green area 2654.2 sqm (25.19%) of net plot area,
5250.87 sqm as proposed ground coverage and 2627.48 sqm under road and paved area
keeping the net plot area at 10532.55 sqm.
After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the standard conditions in practice.
Item No.[7] Environment Clearance for construction of “Ruhil Township” (Plotted
Development) at Sector-36, Jhajjar, Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s
GNEX Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the Authority was of the unanimous opinion that it needs more time to study and analyze
the case, therefore it has been deferred for the next meeting.
In the today’s meeting the Authority decided to defer this case and to
depute Sh. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC to visit the site and submit the report at the
earliest possible.
Item No.[8] Extension of EC for Group Housing Complex “Parikarma” at Sec-20,
Village Kundli, Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Santur Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Lastly the case was taken up in the 112th meeting held on 02.05.2018 and
the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent
should be heard before taking a final view on this issue as per the request of authorized
signatory of M/s Santur Projects Pvt. Ltd.
In the today’s meeting after detailed deliberations the Authority
unanimously decided that it needs more time to study and analyse the case and Authority
decided to give an opportunity to the project proponent to personally present and plead
5
his case. The project proponent may please appear with all the necessary documents in
the next SEIAA meeting.
Item No.[9] Environment Clearance for the “Revision and Expansion of Group
Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Lastly the case was taken up in the 98th meeting held on 05.12.2016 and the
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be
asked to submit satisfactory reply within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.
Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report
within 15 days period.
In the today’s meeting, it was noticed that the site visit report is not
received from the members. The project proponent has submitted a request for
withdrawing their case for “Revision and Expansion of Group Housing Colony” located
at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111, Gurgaon, Haryana. The project proponent
informed that the expansion part of project will be undergoing re-design to avail
additional FAR as per the TOD (Transit Oriented Development) norms.
After detailed deliberations the Authority unanimously decided to defer this
case till the receipt of site visit report.
Item No.[10] Environment Clearance for proposed Expansion of Miri Piri Institute
of Medical Sciences and Research Campus at Shahbab markanda, Ku
rukshetra, Haryana by M/S Miri Piri Institute of Medical Sciences &
Research (Charitbale Trust)
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance
subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Expansion of
Miri Piri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Campus at Shahbab markanda, Ku
rukshetra, Haryana on a total plot area of 101782 sqm (25.14 Acres). The total built up
area shall be 67776.13 sqm. The proposed project comprise of Hospital Building,
Institute Building, Animal House, Mortuary, Laundry/Workshop, auditorium, Boys
Hostel, Girls Hostel, Type IV (64 no. of Unit), Type III (32 no. of Unit), Type II (16 no.
of Unit), Type I (8 no. of Unit), Laundry/Workshop, Incinerator. The maximum height of
the building shall be 18 meters. The total water requirement shall be 470 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 345 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 268 KLD
which will be treated in the STP of 323 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall
be 5700 KVA which will be supplied by UHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed
to develop green belt on 30534.6 sqm (30%) of project area (Green belt Plantation 2770.6
sqm + Peripheral Plantation is 1769 sqm + Avenue Plantation 2370 sqm + Lawn area
23625 sqm). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 25 rain water harvesting pits as
approved by the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA). The solid waste generation
will be 1854 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are 487 ECS.
6
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The case has been thoroughly examined and pointed out that:
[1] Since the Rudraksh Enviro Care Pvt. Ltd. has not got any Environment Clearance,
hence project proponent cannot be allowed to have agreement with this firm.
[2] The project proponent has not explained as to how they would handle and dispose
the bio-medical waste they are advised to come up with proposal as how they
would dispose are handle of bio-medical waste with latest technology.
After detailed deliberations the Authority unanimously decided to defer this
case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the
above raised observation within 15 days period and give presentation on the technology
being proposed to install.
Item No.[11] Environment Clearance for proposed Boulder, gravel and Sand (Minor
Mineral) at “Charnia Block/PKL B 4” at Village Karanpur, Johluwala,
Charnian, Kiratpur, Tehsil- Pinjore, District-Panchkula (Haryana). by
M/s Shiri Ganesh Royalty Co.,
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s
Shiri Ganesh Royalty Co for Mining of Boulder, gravel and Sand at “Charnia Block/PKL
B 4” at Village Karanpur, Johluwala, Charnian, Kiratpur, Tehsil- Pinjore, District-
Panchkula (Haryana) by imposing stipulations stated therein.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for
a period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
(LOI) dated 16.07.2017. The lease has been granted for an area of 29.65 Ha having Village
Karanpur, Johluwala, Charnian, Kiratpur, Tehsil- Pinjore, District-Panchkula. The project
proponent on 16.08.2017 uploaded online application along with copy of approved Mining
Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years.
NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village Karanpur, Johluwala, Charnian, Kiratpur,
Tehsil- Pinjore, District-Panchkula
3. Project Details
Khasra No.
Charnia Block/PKL-B-4
Production capacity
Mining of Boulder, gravel and Sand at “Charnia
Block/PKL B 4” an area of 29.65 Ha
Karanpur 162 min
Johluwala 16 min
Charnia 12 min
Kiratpur 548 min, 549 min & 598 min
14,00,000 TPA @ 187 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 5 Crore
7
5. Water Requirement & Source 64 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 48 KLD
Plantation 12 KLD
Drinking 4 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
20 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 15 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
14,00,000 TPA. Ground water will not be
contaminated as river bed mining will be restrected
up to depth of 3 m where as the general ground
water talble is 8-10 meter bgl. The Bench mRL will
be 479.39-473.80 for five years.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Block Latitude Longitude
Charnia
Block/PKL-
B-4
N30°50'19.20”
to
N30°51'44.2
E76°50 '53.80"
to
E76°51 '51.5"
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 4000 Trees
II Yr. 4000 Trees
III Yr. 4000 Trees
IV Yr. 4000 Trees
V Yr. 4000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The case has been thoroughly examined and pointed out that:
[1] The project proponent should submit location and layout/ topology of the area
indicating the distance from bridge and embankment.
[2] How would the project proponent ensure that the depth of mining should be
restricting to 3 meter so that water level is not exposed?
[3] How the project proponent would ensure that no in-stream mining would take
place?
[4] How does project proponent ensure that water from washing of wheels may be
done efficiently & minimum water is consumed? What is location of Water
trough?
[5] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water from nearby STP for dust
suppression and sprinkling. Have the project proponent identified the source of
STP or have they entered any MoU with the supplier of water?
[6] The project proponent should submit the plan to ensure no natural water
course/water body would be obstructed due to any mining operations or dumping
of the materials.
8
[7] How the project proponent would reclaim the area concerned and reclamation plan
of the mining site should be submitted.
[8] The project proponent should submit the topography of the mine area to ensure
that leasing of mine does not result into a cluster situation.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded to project proponent provided
they submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days.
It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all
the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[12] Environment Clearance for mining of “Boulder, Gravel and Sand”
(Minor Mineral) at Dhanaura Block/YNR B-18, over an area of 18.18
Ha. at Village Dhanaura, District-Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) by M/s
JPY Consortium Pvt. Ltd,
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s
JPY Consortium Pvt. Ltd, for “Boulder, Gravel and Sand” (Minor Mineral) at Dhanaura
Block/YNR B-18, over an area of 18.18 Ha. at Village Dhanaura, District-Yamuna Nagar
(Haryana) by imposing stipulations stated therein.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for
a period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
(LOI) dated 28.12.2017. The lease has been granted for an area of 18.18 Ha having Village
Dhanaura, District-Yamuna Nagar (Haryana). The project proponent on 04.04.2018
uploaded online application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2.
The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The
Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500
meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2.
NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village Dhanaura, District-Yamuna Nagar (Haryana)