Minute Order - Dec. 19, 2013ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/adm/2013/documents/... · 2013-12-19 · District/Division Rehab PM Metro Urban STWD CMAQ Bridge STP MM Safety TE Misc

District/DivisionRehab

PM Metro Urban STWD CMAQ Bridge STP MM Safety TE MiscGreen Ribbon CBI

Earmark Match

District Discretionary

Strategic Priority

Comm Disc (Dist)

Comm Disc (TMA) CMAQ STP-MM

Additional Allocation District/Division

MPO/TMA Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 2 Cat 4 Cat 5 Cat 6 Cat 7 Cat 8 Cat 9 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 11 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 (Recon) Cat 12 (Recon) Cat. 12 Total MPO/TMAAbilene 28.23$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30.73$ Abilene Amarillo 43.92 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 46.42 Amarillo Atlanta 27.08 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.08 Atlanta Austin 64.12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.50 60.94 - - - - - 131.56 Austin Beaumont 25.88 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 28.38 Beaumont Brownwood 12.58 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 15.08 BrownwoodBryan 34.07 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 36.57 BryanChildress 19.97 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 22.47 Childress Corpus Christi 49.97 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 4.50 - - - - - 56.97 Corpus ChristiDallas 81.24 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.47 2.50 242.73 - - - - - 326.94 DallasEl Paso 20.75 - - - - - - - - - - 22.72 - 0.25 - - - - - - 43.72 El PasoFt. Worth 55.94 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.56 2.50 107.27 - - - - - 168.27 Ft. Worth Houston 96.29 - - - - - - - - - - - 3.22 2.50 277.50 - - - - - 379.51 HoustonLaredo 37.37 - - - - - - - - - - 13.12 0.56 2.50 - - - - - - 53.55 LaredoLubbock 44.46 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 46.96 LubbockLufkin 28.45 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 30.95 Lufkin Odessa 22.15 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.75 - - - - - - 23.90 Odessa Paris 39.46 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 41.96 ParisPharr 41.68 - - - - - - - - - - 8.27 1.70 2.50 11.30 - - - - - 65.45 Pharr San Angelo 15.52 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 40.07 - - - - - 58.09 San AngeloSan Antonio 68.06 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.44 2.50 18.00 - - - - - 89.00 San AntonioTyler 27.26 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.17 2.50 - - - - - - 30.93 TylerWaco 42.42 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.45 2.50 21.00 - - - - - 66.37 WacoWichita Falls 18.84 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 21.34 Wichita FallsYoakum 36.54 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 39.04 Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - 4.49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.49 (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - 57.01 - 4.94 - - - - - - - - - - - 61.95 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - 75.70 - 102.47 - 18.80 - - - - - - - - - 1.89 - 198.86 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - 8.89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.36 - - 9.25 (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - 2.93 - - - - 6.33 - 1.16 - - - - - - - - - 0.21 - 10.63 (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - 126.94 - - 80.68 - 108.47 - 19.90 - - - - - 18.94 - - - 3.76 - 358.69 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - 10.00 - - 8.94 - 15.27 - 2.80 - - - - - - - - 1.98 - - 38.99 (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - 2.99 - - - 9.01 - 0.86 - - - - - - - - - - - 12.86 (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - 0.87 - - - - 12.32 - 0.86 - - - - - - - - - 0.16 - 14.21 (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - 16.52 - 2.64 - - - - - - - - - 0.82 - 19.98 (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - 8.32 - 0.80 - - - - - - - - - - - 9.12 (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - 3.68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.68 (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - 34.75 - 6.38 - - - - - - - - - 1.03 - 42.16 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - 1.30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.30 (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - 4.30 - 0.78 - - - - - - - - - - - 5.08 (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - 1.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.50 (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - 250.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 250.00 BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - 155.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 155.00 TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - 74.38 - - - - - - - - - - - 74.38 DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - 15.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15.00 Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - 3.50 - - - - - - - - - - 3.50 Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - 1.10 - - - - - - - - - - 1.10 Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Systemic Widening ProgramPriority Rural Highway Projects - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Priority Rural Highway ProjectsTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - 10.00 - - - - - - - - - - 10.00 Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 2.00 Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - 15.00 - - - - - - - - - - 15.00 Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide 3.35 - - - 12.19 - - - - - 14.00 - - - - - - - - - 29.54 StatewideEnergy Sector 225.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 225.00 Energy SectorStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide UnallocatedMAP-21 (Flex) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAP-21 (Flex)

Total 1,210.60$ 140.74$ 22.85$ -$ 177.51$ 250.00$ 374.77$ 170.00$ 134.30$ 31.60$ 14.00$ 44.11$ 10.57$ 61.00$ 802.25$ -$ -$ 2.34$ 7.87$ -$ 3,454.51$ Total

Cat 10 Statewide Programs (2014 - 2023) AllocationTPW - Texas Park and Wildlife Roads 10.00$ GR - Green Ribbon 11.00LIA - Landscape Incentive Awards Program 2.00RSM - Railroad Signal Maintenance 1.10RGC - State RR Grade Crossing & Replanking 3.50ADA - Curb Ramp Program 15.00

Total 42.60$

APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 2014 FUNDING ALLOCATIONS (August 29, 2013 - Commission MO 113675)2014 UTP(in millions)

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013



Earmark Match

District Discretionary Strategic Priority

Comm Disc (Dist)



MPO/TMA Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 2 Cat 4 Cat 5 Cat 6 Cat 7 Cat 8 Cat 9 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 11 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 (Recon) Cat 12 (Recon) Cat. 12 Total MPO/TMAAbilene 2.19 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.83 (0.15) - - - - - - 3.87 Abilene Amarillo (2.53) - - - - - - - - - - - - (0.18) - - - - - 0.92 (1.79) Amarillo Atlanta (1.30) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (1.30) Atlanta Austin (0.43) - - - - - - - - - - - 0.64 3.78 3.00 - - - - - 6.99 Austin Beaumont (6.12) - - - 16.82 - - - - - - - 0.02 - 3.07 - - - - - 13.79 Beaumont Brownwood (0.38) - - - - - - - - - - - - (0.51) - - - - - - (0.89) BrownwoodBryan (1.05) - - - - - - - - - - - 0.04 0.37 - - - - - - (0.64) BryanChildress (0.74) - - - - - - - - - - - - (0.15) - - - - - - (0.89) Childress Corpus Christi (7.85) - - - - - - - - - - - 1.25 (2.50) - - - - - - (9.10) Corpus ChristiDallas (13.24) - - - - - - - - - - - (0.47) (0.87) 1.00 - - - - - (13.58) DallasEl Paso 3.67 - - - - - - - - - - (0.02) 1.22 (0.10) - - - - - - 4.77 El PasoFt. Worth 3.58 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 6.37 - 0.01 - - - 58.01 68.55 Ft. Worth Houston (5.68) - - - - - - - - - - - 2.99 1.19 3.25 - - - - - 1.75 HoustonLaredo (1.97) - - 5.00 - - - - - - - 1.37 1.74 - - 0.01 - - - - 6.15 LaredoLubbock (1.34) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (1.34) LubbockLufkin (3.36) - - - - - - - - - - - 0.06 0.33 - - - - - - (2.97) Lufkin Odessa (0.83) - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.38 - 0.02 - - - - (0.43) Odessa Paris 2.52 - - - - - - - - - - - - (0.02) - - - - - - 2.50 ParisPharr (13.07) - - - - - - - - - - (0.01) (0.05) - - - - - - - (13.13) Pharr San Angelo (1.76) - - - - - - - - - - - 0.01 (0.27) - - - - - 1.76 (0.26) San AngeloSan Antonio (2.33) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (2.33) San AntonioTyler 0.33 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.11 - - - - - - 0.44 TylerWaco 1.84 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.33 1.68 - - - - - - 5.85 WacoWichita Falls (3.37) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (3.37) Wichita FallsYoakum (5.04) - - - - - - - - - - - - (0.10) - - - - - - (5.14) Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - 0.07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.59 0.66 (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - 1.90 - - - - 16.15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18.05 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - 24.24 - - 31.25 - 76.79 - - - - - - - - - 0.37 0.77 0.58 - 134.00 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.37 - - 0.37 (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - 2.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.37 (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - (2.92) - - - - 1.14 - - - - - - - - - - - (0.21) - (1.99) (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - 2.43 - - - - 96.39 - - - - - - - - - - 6.25 15.22 - 120.29 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - 28.10 - - 4.56 - 22.33 - - - - - - - - - - 6.36 0.97 - 62.32 (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - 0.04 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.04 (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - (1.00) - - - - - - - - - - - - - (1.00) (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - 2.58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.58 (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - 2.79 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.79 (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - 0.32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.32 (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - 0.22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.22 (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - 29.96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29.96 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - 4.09 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.09 (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - 3.89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.89 (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - (0.86) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (0.86) BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - 41.60 - - - - - - - - - - - 41.60 DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - 14.13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 14.13 Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - (0.29) - - - - - - - - - - (0.29) Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - 0.05 Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - 3.32 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.32 Systemic Widening ProgramPriority Rural Highway Projects - - - - - - - 27.57 - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.57 Priority Rural Highway ProjectsTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - 1.24 - - - - - - - - - - 1.24 Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - (0.22) - - - - - - - - - - (0.22) Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - - 0.21 - - - - - (0.39) - - - - - - - - - (0.18) StatewideEnergy Sector - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy SectorStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64.03 - - - - - 64.03 Statewide UnallocatedMAP-21 (Flex) - - - - 50.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50.37 MAP-21 (Flex)

Total (58.26)$ 53.75$ 9.49$ 5.00$ 103.21$ (0.86)$ 248.64$ 45.02$ 41.60$ 0.78$ (0.39)$ 1.34$ 12.19$ 9.36$ 74.35$ 0.04$ 0.37$ 13.75$ 16.56$ 61.28$ 637.22$ Total

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ADJUSTMENTS(in millions)

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013



Earmark Match


Strategic Priority

Comm Disc (Dist)



MPO/TMA Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 2 Cat 4 Cat 5 Cat 6 Cat 7 Cat 8 Cat 9 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 11 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 (Recon) Cat 12 (Recon) Cat. 12 Total MPO/TMAAbilene 30.42 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.83 2.35 - - - - - - 34.60$ Abilene Amarillo 41.39 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.32 - - - - - 0.92 44.63 Amarillo Atlanta 25.78 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25.78 Atlanta Austin 63.69 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.64 10.28 63.94 - - - - - 138.55 Austin Beaumont 19.76 - - - 16.82 - - - - - - - 0.02 2.50 3.07 - - - - - 42.17 Beaumont Brownwood 12.20 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.99 - - - - - - 14.19 BrownwoodBryan 33.02 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.04 2.87 - - - - - - 35.93 BryanChildress 19.23 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.35 - - - - - - 21.58 Childress Corpus Christi 42.12 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.25 - 4.50 - - - - - 47.87 Corpus ChristiDallas 68.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.63 243.73 - - - - - 313.36 DallasEl Paso 24.42 - - - - - - - - - - 22.70 1.22 0.15 - - - - - - 48.49 El PasoFt. Worth 59.52 - - - - - - - - - - - 3.14 8.87 107.27 0.01 - - - 58.01 236.82 Ft. Worth Houston 90.61 - - - - - - - - - - - 6.21 3.69 280.75 - - - - - 381.26 HoustonLaredo 35.40 - - 5.00 - - - - - - - 14.49 2.30 2.50 - 0.01 - - - - 59.70 LaredoLubbock 43.12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 45.62 LubbockLufkin 25.09 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.06 2.83 - - - - - - 27.98 Lufkin Odessa 21.32 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.13 - 0.02 - - - - 23.47 Odessa Paris 41.98 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.48 - - - - - - 44.46 ParisPharr 28.61 - - - - - - - - - - 8.26 1.65 2.50 11.30 - - - - - 52.32 Pharr San Angelo 13.76 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.01 2.23 40.07 - - - - 1.76 57.83 San AngeloSan Antonio 65.73 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.44 2.50 18.00 - - - - - 86.67 San AntonioTyler 27.59 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.17 2.61 - - - - - - 31.37 TylerWaco 44.26 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.78 4.18 21.00 - - - - - 72.22 WacoWichita Falls 15.47 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 17.97 Wichita FallsYoakum 31.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.40 - - - - - - 33.90 Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - 4.56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.59 5.15 (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - 1.90 - - - - 73.16 - 4.94 - - - - - - - - - - - 80.00 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - 24.24 - - 106.95 - 179.26 - 18.80 - - - - - - - 0.37 0.77 2.47 - 332.86 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - 8.89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.73 - - 9.62 (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - 2.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.37 (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - 0.01 - - - - 7.47 - 1.16 - - - - - - - - - - - 8.64 (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - 129.37 - - 80.68 - 204.86 - 19.90 - - - - - 18.94 - - 6.25 18.98 - 478.98 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - 38.10 - - 13.50 - 37.60 - 2.80 - - - - - - - - 8.34 0.97 - 101.31 (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - 3.03 - - - 9.01 - 0.86 - - - - - - - - - - - 12.90 (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - 0.87 - - - - 11.32 - 0.86 - - - - - - - - - 0.16 - 13.21 (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - 2.58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.58 (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - 19.31 - 2.64 - - - - - - - - - 0.82 - 22.77 (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - 0.32 - - - 8.32 - 0.80 - - - - - - - - - - - 9.44 (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - 3.90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.90 (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - 64.71 - 6.38 - - - - - - - - - 1.03 - 72.12 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - 1.30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.30 (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - 8.39 - 0.78 - - - - - - - - - - - 9.17 (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - 5.39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5.39 (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - 249.14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 249.14 BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - 155.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 155.00 TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - 115.98 - - - - - - - - - - - 115.98 DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - 29.13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 29.13 Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - 3.21 - - - - - - - - - - 3.21 Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - 1.15 - - - - - - - - - - 1.15 Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - 3.32 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.32 Systemic Widening ProgramPriority Rural Highway Projects - - - - - - - 27.57 - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.57 Priority Rural Highway ProjectsTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - 10.00 - - - - - - - - - - 10.00 Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - 3.24 - - - - - - - - - - 3.24 Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - 14.78 - - - - - - - - - - 14.78 Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide 3.35 - - - 12.40 - - - - - 13.61 - - - - - - - - - 29.36 StatewideEnergy Sector 225.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 225.00 Energy SectorStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64.03 - - - - - 64.03 Statewide UnallocatedMAP-21 (Flex) - - - - 50.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50.37 MAP-21 (Flex)

Total 1,152.34$ 194.49$ 32.34$ 5.00$ 280.72$ 249.14$ 623.41$ 215.02$ 175.90$ 32.38$ 13.61$ 45.45$ 22.76$ 70.36$ 876.60$ 0.04$ 0.37$ 16.09$ 24.43$ 61.28$ 4,091.73$ Total

Note: "Funds subject to transfer to STP Flex based on provisions outlined under Section 1509 of MAP 21 that amend Section 126 of Title 23 USC"

REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2014 FUNDING ALLOCATIONS (December 2013 - Commission Meeting)(in millions)

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

District/DivisionSH 121 Surplus Toll

RevenueSH 161 Surplus Toll

RevenueSH 130 Concession

Revenue Local Participation PTFProp 12

Program 1Prop 12

Program 2 Prop 14 TMF Sub-Total Prop 14SB District/Division

MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene - - - - - - - - - - - - Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - 69.00 - 16.10 - - - - 85.10 - 85.10 Austin Beaumont - - - - 20.13 - - - - 20.13 - 20.13 Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - - - 6.15 6.15 BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - - 22.00 22.00 - 22.00 Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - 14.41 - - - 53.25 67.66 - 67.66 DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 Ft. Worth Houston - - - - 11.97 - - - 59.36 71.33 - 71.33 HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - 7.00 - 7.00 - 7.00 LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - 0.75 - 0.75 - 0.75 Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - - - - 10.52 - 10.52 - 10.52 Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - 71.28 15.00 - 5.36 - 91.64 - 91.64 San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - 7.00 - - - - - - 7.00 - 7.00 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - 171.69 171.69 - 171.69 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA 372.55 23.37 - - - - - - - 395.92 - 395.92 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - 6.86 - 6.86 - 6.86 (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - 3.99 - 3.99 - 3.99 (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - 4.22 - 4.22 - 4.22 (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - 0.97 - 0.97 - 0.97 (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - 54.44 - 54.44 - 54.44 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - - - - - - Systemic Widening ProgramPriority Rural Highway Projects - - - - - - - - - - - - Priority Rural Highway ProjectsTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - 21.00 449.15 - - - 1.02 - 471.17 - 471.17 StatewideEnergy Sector - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy SectorStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide Unallocated

Total 372.55$ 23.37$ 97.00$ 449.15$ 133.89$ 15.00$ -$ 95.13$ 307.30$ 1,493.39$ 6.15$ 1,499.54$ Total

APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 2014 NON-TRADITIONAL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS (August 29, 2013 - Commission Meeting MO 113675)2014 UTP(in millions)

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene - - - - - - 36.88 7.76 - 44.64 - 44.64 Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - 21.35 - - 21.35 - 21.35 Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - 2.56 - - 2.56 - 2.56 Atlanta Austin - - - - 15.03 - 32.64 - - 47.67 13.43 61.10 Austin Beaumont - - - - - - 39.43 - - 39.43 - 39.43 Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - 13.47 - - 13.47 4.10 17.57 BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - 2.09 - - 2.09 - 2.09 Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - - - - - - - - - DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - 7.90 0.16 50.84 - 14.00 72.90 - 72.90 Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - 52.98 12.82 - 33.48 99.28 - 99.28 HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - 7.05 0.02 - 7.07 - 7.07 Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - 30.18 1.48 - 31.66 - 31.66 ParisPharr - - - - - - - - - - - - Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - 1.34 1.34 - 1.34 San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - 23.52 - 15.25 - - 38.77 - 38.77 San AntonioTyler - - - - - - 7.10 - - 7.10 - 7.10 TylerWaco - - - - - - 5.80 0.27 - 6.07 - 6.07 WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - 3.97 - 3.97 - 3.97 (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - 4.78 3.60 - 8.38 - 8.38 (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - 6.00 - - - 31.74 - - 37.74 - 37.74 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - 41.31 - (17.36) 23.95 - 23.95 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - 4.80 - - 4.80 - 4.80 (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - - - - - - 0.84 - - 0.84 - 0.84 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - 5.30 - 5.30 - 5.30 (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - 0.01 - - 0.01 - 0.01 (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - 2.35 - - 2.35 - 2.35 (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - 0.04 - - 0.04 - 0.04 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - 5.34 - - 5.34 - 5.34 (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - 3.49 - - 3.49 - 3.49 (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - 4.25 - - 4.25 - 4.25 (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - 11.58 - - 11.58 - 11.58 BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - - - - - - Systemic Widening ProgramPriority Rural Highway Projects - - - - - - - - - - - - Priority Rural Highway ProjectsTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - (0.02) - - 5.73 192.57 - 198.28 - 198.28 StatewideEnergy Sector - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy SectorStatewide Unallocated - - - - - 37.14 0.26 101.84 24.41 163.65 23.96 187.61 Statewide Unallocated

Total -$ -$ 6.00$ (0.02)$ 46.45$ 90.28$ 393.98$ 316.81$ 55.87$ 909.37$ 41.49$ 950.86$ Total

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ADJUSTMENTS(in millions)

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene - - - - - - 36.88 7.76 - 44.64 - 44.64 Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - 21.35 - - 21.35 - 21.35 Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - 2.56 - - 2.56 - 2.56 Atlanta Austin - - 69.00 - 31.13 - 32.64 - - 132.77 13.43 146.20 Austin Beaumont - - - - 20.13 - 39.43 - - 59.56 - 59.56 Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - 13.47 - - 13.47 10.25 23.72 BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - 2.09 - 22.00 24.09 - 24.09 Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - 14.41 - - - 53.25 67.66 - 67.66 DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - 7.90 0.16 50.84 - 15.00 73.90 - 73.90 Ft. Worth Houston - - - - 11.97 52.98 12.82 - 92.84 170.61 - 170.61 HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - 7.00 - 7.00 - 7.00 LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - 7.05 0.02 - 7.07 - 7.07 Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - 0.75 - 0.75 - 0.75 Odessa Paris - - - - - - 30.18 1.48 - 31.66 - 31.66 ParisPharr - - - - - - - 10.52 - 10.52 - 10.52 Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - 1.34 1.34 - 1.34 San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - 94.80 15.00 15.25 5.36 - 130.41 - 130.41 San AntonioTyler - - - - - - 7.10 - - 7.10 - 7.10 TylerWaco - - - - - - 5.80 0.27 - 6.07 - 6.07 WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - 3.97 - 3.97 - 3.97 (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - 4.78 3.60 - 8.38 - 8.38 (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - 13.00 - - - 31.74 - - 44.74 - 44.74 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - 41.31 - 154.33 195.64 - 195.64 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - 4.80 - - 4.80 - 4.80 (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA 372.55 23.37 - - - - 0.84 - - 396.76 - 396.76 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - 5.30 - 5.30 - 5.30 (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - 0.01 - - 0.01 - 0.01 (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - 6.86 - 6.86 - 6.86 (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - 2.35 - - 2.35 - 2.35 (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - 3.99 - 3.99 - 3.99 (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - 4.22 - 4.22 - 4.22 (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - 0.97 - 0.97 - 0.97 (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - 0.04 54.44 - 54.48 - 54.48 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - 5.34 - - 5.34 - 5.34 (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - 3.49 - - 3.49 - 3.49 (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - 4.25 - - 4.25 - 4.25 (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - 11.58 - - 11.58 - 11.58 BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - - - - - - Systemic Widening ProgramPriority Rural Highway Projects - - - - - - - - - - - - Priority Rural Highway ProjectsTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - 21.00 449.13 - - 5.73 193.59 - 669.45 - 669.45 StatewideEnergy Sector - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy SectorStatewide Unallocated - - - - - 37.14 0.26 101.84 24.41 163.65 23.96 187.61 Statewide Unallocated

Total 372.55$ 23.37$ 103.00$ 449.13$ 180.34$ 105.28$ 393.98$ 411.94$ 363.17$ 2,402.76$ 47.64$ 2,450.40$ Total

REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2014 NON-TRADITIONAL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS (December 2013 - Commission Meeting)(in millions)

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013



Earmark Match


Strategic Priority

Comm Disc (Dist)



MPO/TMA Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 2 Cat 4 Cat 5 Cat 6 Cat 7 Cat 8 Cat 9 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 11 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 (Recon) Cat 12 (Recon) Cat. 12 Total MPO/TMAAbilene 28.98$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 31.48$ Abilene Amarillo 45.22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 47.72 Amarillo Atlanta 27.77 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5.00 - - - - - - 32.77 Atlanta Austin 65.93 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 42.68 - - - - - 111.11 Austin Beaumont 26.63 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.09 2.50 - - - - - - 30.22 Beaumont Brownwood 12.87 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 15.37 BrownwoodBryan 34.93 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 37.43 BryanChildress 20.44 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 22.94 Childress Corpus Christi 51.47 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 53.97 Corpus ChristiDallas 83.89 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.42 2.50 - - - - - - 87.81 DallasEl Paso 21.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.31 9.16 - - - - - 30.85 El PasoFt. Worth 57.61 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 3.00 10.75 - - - - 73.86 Ft. Worth Houston 99.54 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.04 2.50 20.85 - - - - - 124.93 HoustonLaredo 38.44 - - - - - - - - - - 66.76 1.89 2.50 - - - - - - 109.59 LaredoLubbock 45.81 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 48.31 LubbockLufkin 29.16 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 31.66 Lufkin Odessa 22.83 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 25.33 Odessa Paris 40.53 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 43.03 ParisPharr 39.93 - - - - - - - - - - 41.08 1.40 2.50 30.00 - - - - - 114.91 Pharr San Angelo 15.89 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 18.39 San AngeloSan Antonio 70.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 72.51 San AntonioTyler 27.85 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 30.35 TylerWaco 43.61 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.40 2.50 - - - - - - 46.51 WacoWichita Falls 19.34 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 21.84 Wichita FallsYoakum 37.47 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 39.97 Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - 3.52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.52 (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - 50.70 - - - - 21.46 - 1.97 - - - - - - - - - 0.90 - 75.03 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - 36.21 - - 64.76 - 81.64 - 7.49 - - - - - - - - - 1.89 - 191.99 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - 9.25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.36 - - 9.61 (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - 5.04 - 0.46 - - - - - - - - - 0.20 - 5.70 (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - - - - 69.02 - 86.43 - 7.93 - - - - - - - - - - - 163.38 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - 91.17 - - 7.65 - 12.16 - 1.12 - - - - - - - - - - - 112.10 (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - 3.71 - 0.34 - - - - - - - - - - - 4.05 (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - 3.74 - 0.34 - - - - - - - - - 0.16 - 4.24 (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - 6.98 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.98 (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - 2.92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.92 (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - 11.48 - 1.05 - - - - - - - - - 0.41 - 12.94 (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - 3.43 - 0.31 - - - - - - - - - - - 3.74 (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - 63.75 - - - - 27.69 - 2.54 - - - - - - - - - 1.03 - 95.01 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - 0.61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.61 (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - 12.23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12.23 (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - 3.43 - 0.32 - - - - - - - - - - - 3.75 (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - 14.11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14.11 (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - 250.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 250.00 BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - 155.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 155.00 TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - 107.53 - - - - - - - - - - - 107.53 DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - 15.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15.00 Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - 3.50 - - - - - - - - - - 3.50 Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - 1.10 - - - - - - - - - - 1.10 Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Systemic Widening ProgramTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - 10.00 - - - - - - - - - - 10.00 Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 2.00 Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - 15.00 - - - - - - - - - - 15.00 Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide 3.35 - - - - - - - - - 11.00 - - - - - - - - - 14.35 StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide UnallocatedMAP-21 (Flex) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAP-21 (Flex)

Total 1,010.88$ 241.83$ 49.62$ -$ 141.43$ 250.00$ 260.21$ 170.00$ 131.40$ 31.60$ 11.00$ 107.84$ 8.24$ 62.81$ 105.69$ 10.75$ -$ 0.36$ 4.59$ -$ 2,598.25$ Total

APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 2015 FUNDING ALLOCATIONS (August 29, 2013 - Commission MO 113675)2014 UTP(in millions)

10:28 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013



Earmark Match

District Discretionary Strategic Priority

Comm Disc (Dist)



MPO/TMA Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 2 Cat 4 Cat 5 Cat 6 Cat 7 Cat 8 Cat 9 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 11 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 (Recon) Cat 12 (Recon) Cat. 12 Total MPO/TMAAbilene -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austin Beaumont - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - (36.32) - - - - - - - - - - - (36.32) DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Systemic Widening ProgramTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide UnallocatedMAP-21 (Flex) - - - - - - - - 36.32 - - - - - - - - - - - 36.32 MAP-21 (Flex)

Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total

FUND TRANSFER ADJUSTMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2015(in millions)

5:26 PM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013



Earmark Match


Strategic Priority

Comm Disc (Dist)



MPO/TMA Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 2 Cat 4 Cat 5 Cat 6 Cat 7 Cat 8 Cat 9 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 10 Cat 11 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 Cat 12 (Recon) Cat 12 (Recon) Cat. 12 Total MPO/TMAAbilene 28.98$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 31.48$ Abilene Amarillo 45.22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 47.72 Amarillo Atlanta 27.77 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5.00 - - - - - - 32.77 Atlanta Austin 65.93 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 42.68 - - - - - 111.11 Austin Beaumont 26.63 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.09 2.50 - - - - - - 30.22 Beaumont Brownwood 12.87 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 15.37 BrownwoodBryan 34.93 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 37.43 BryanChildress 20.44 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 22.94 Childress Corpus Christi 51.47 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 53.97 Corpus ChristiDallas 83.89 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.42 2.50 - - - - - - 87.81 DallasEl Paso 21.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.31 9.16 - - - - - 30.85 El PasoFt. Worth 57.61 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 3.00 10.75 - - - - 73.86 Ft. Worth Houston 99.54 - - - - - - - - - - - 2.04 2.50 20.85 - - - - - 124.93 HoustonLaredo 38.44 - - - - - - - - - - 66.76 1.89 2.50 - - - - - - 109.59 LaredoLubbock 45.81 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 48.31 LubbockLufkin 29.16 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 31.66 Lufkin Odessa 22.83 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 25.33 Odessa Paris 40.53 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 43.03 ParisPharr 39.93 - - - - - - - - - - 41.08 1.40 2.50 30.00 - - - - - 114.91 Pharr San Angelo 15.89 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 18.39 San AngeloSan Antonio 70.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 72.51 San AntonioTyler 27.85 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 30.35 TylerWaco 43.61 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.40 2.50 - - - - - - 46.51 WacoWichita Falls 19.34 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 21.84 Wichita FallsYoakum 37.47 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.50 - - - - - - 39.97 Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - 3.52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.52 (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - 50.70 - - - - 21.46 - 1.97 - - - - - - - - - 0.90 - 75.03 (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - 36.21 - - 64.76 - 81.64 - 7.49 - - - - - - - - - 1.89 - 191.99 (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - 9.25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.36 - - 9.61 (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - 5.04 - 0.46 - - - - - - - - - 0.20 - 5.70 (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - - - - 69.02 - 86.43 - 7.93 - - - - - - - - - - - 163.38 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - 91.17 - - 7.65 - 12.16 - 1.12 - - - - - - - - - - - 112.10 (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - 3.71 - 0.34 - - - - - - - - - - - 4.05 (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - 3.74 - 0.34 - - - - - - - - - 0.16 - 4.24 (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - 6.98 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.98 (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - 2.92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.92 (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - 11.48 - 1.05 - - - - - - - - - 0.41 - 12.94 (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - 3.43 - 0.31 - - - - - - - - - - - 3.74 (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - 63.75 - - - - 27.69 - 2.54 - - - - - - - - - 1.03 - 95.01 (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - 0.61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.61 (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - 12.23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12.23 (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - 3.43 - 0.32 - - - - - - - - - - - 3.75 (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - 14.11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14.11 (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - 250.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 250.00 BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - 155.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 155.00 TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - 71.21 - - - - - - - - - - - 71.21 DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - 15.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15.00 Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - 3.50 - - - - - - - - - - 3.50 Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - 1.10 - - - - - - - - - - 1.10 Railroad Signal MaintenanceSystemic Widening Program - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Systemic Widening ProgramTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - 10.00 - - - - - - - - - - 10.00 Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - 2.00 - - - - - - - - - - 2.00 Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - 15.00 - - - - - - - - - - 15.00 Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide 3.35 - - - - - - - - - 11.00 - - - - - - - - - 14.35 StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide UnallocatedMAP-21 (Flex) - - - - - - - - 36.32 - - - - - - - - - - - 36.32 MAP-21 (Flex)

Total 1,010.88$ 241.83$ 49.62$ -$ 141.43$ 250.00$ 260.21$ 170.00$ 131.40$ 31.60$ 11.00$ 107.84$ 8.24$ 62.81$ 105.69$ 10.75$ -$ 0.36$ 4.59$ -$ 2,598.25$ Total

Note: "Funds subject to transfer to STP Flex based on provisions outlined under Section 1509 of MAP 21 that amend Section 126 of Title 23 USC"

REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2015 FUNDING ALLOCATIONS (December 2013 - Commission Meeting)(in millions)

10:28 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - - - 23.05 - - - - 23.05 - 23.05 Austin Beaumont - - - - - - - - - - - - Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - - - 5.16 5.16 BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - 40.00 - 40.00 - 40.00 Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - 23.38 - - 6.68 41.00 71.06 - 71.06 DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - 800.00 800.00 - 800.00 El PasoFt. Worth - - - - 22.35 - - - - 22.35 - 22.35 Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - 36.50 - - - 34.54 71.04 - 71.04 Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - 27.50 - - - - - - 27.50 - 27.50 San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA 170.25 11.80 - - - - - - - 182.05 - 182.05 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - 1,973.81 - - - - - 1,973.81 - 1,973.81 StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide Unallocated

Total 170.25$ 11.80$ 27.50$ 1,973.81$ 105.28$ -$ -$ 46.68$ 875.54$ 3,210.86$ 5.16$ 3,216.02$ Total


10:28 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - - - - - - - - - - - Austin Beaumont - - - - - - - - - - - - Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - - - - - BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - - - - - - Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - - - - - - - - - DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - - - - - 6.42 6.42 - 6.42 Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - - - - - - - - - Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - - - - - - - - - San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - - - - - - - - - - StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide Unallocated

Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6.42$ 6.42$ -$ 6.42$ Total

FUND TRANSFER ADJUSTMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2015 NON-TRADITIONAL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS(in millions)

10:28 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - - - 23.05 - - - - 23.05 - 23.05 Austin Beaumont - - - - - - - - - - - - Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - - - 5.16 5.16 BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - 40.00 - 40.00 - 40.00 Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - 23.38 - - 6.68 41.00 71.06 - 71.06 DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - 800.00 800.00 - 800.00 El PasoFt. Worth - - - - 22.35 - - - 6.42 28.77 - 28.77 Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - 36.50 - - - 34.54 71.04 - 71.04 Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - 27.50 - - - - - - 27.50 - 27.50 San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA 170.25 11.80 - - - - - - - 182.05 - 182.05 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - 1,973.81 - - - - - 1,973.81 - 1,973.81 StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide Unallocated

Total 170.25$ 11.80$ 27.50$ 1,973.81$ 105.28$ -$ -$ 46.68$ 881.96$ 3,217.28$ 5.16$ 3,222.44$ Total


10:28 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - - - 34.21 - - - - 34.21 - 34.21 Austin Beaumont - - - - - - - - - - - - Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - 100.00 100.00 - 100.00 BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - - - - - - Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - 6.03 - - - - 6.03 - 6.03 DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - - - - - 20.42 20.42 - 20.42 Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - - - - - - - - - Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - - - - - - - - - San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA 29.59 0.64 - - - - - - - 30.23 - 30.23 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - 245.26 - - - - - 245.26 - 245.26 StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide Unallocated

Total 29.59$ 0.64$ -$ 245.26$ 40.24$ -$ -$ -$ 120.42$ 436.15$ -$ 436.15$ Total


10:29 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - - - - - - - - - - - Austin Beaumont - - - - - - - - - - - - Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - - - - - BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - - - - - - Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - - - - - - - - - DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - - - - - (20.42) (20.42) - (20.42) Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - - - - - - - - - Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - - - - - - - - - San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - - - - - - - - - - StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide Unallocated

Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (20.42)$ (20.42)$ -$ (20.42)$ Total

FUND TRANSFER ADJUSTMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2016 NON-TRADITIONAL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS(in millions)

10:29 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013





Program 1Prop 12


MPO/TMA Cat 3 Cat. 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 3 Cat 8 Total MPO/TMAAbilene -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Abilene Amarillo - - - - - - - - - - - - Amarillo Atlanta - - - - - - - - - - - - Atlanta Austin - - - - 34.21 - - - - 34.21 - 34.21 Austin Beaumont - - - - - - - - - - - - Beaumont Brownwood - - - - - - - - - - - - BrownwoodBryan - - - - - - - - 100.00 100.00 - 100.00 BryanChildress - - - - - - - - - - - - Childress Corpus Christi - - - - - - - - - - - - Corpus ChristiDallas - - - - 6.03 - - - - 6.03 - 6.03 DallasEl Paso - - - - - - - - - - - - El PasoFt. Worth - - - - - - - - - - - - Ft. Worth Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - HoustonLaredo - - - - - - - - - - - - LaredoLubbock - - - - - - - - - - - - LubbockLufkin - - - - - - - - - - - - Lufkin Odessa - - - - - - - - - - - - Odessa Paris - - - - - - - - - - - - ParisPharr - - - - - - - - - - - - Pharr San Angelo - - - - - - - - - - - - San AngeloSan Antonio - - - - - - - - - - - - San AntonioTyler - - - - - - - - - - - - TylerWaco - - - - - - - - - - - - WacoWichita Falls - - - - - - - - - - - - Wichita FallsYoakum - - - - - - - - - - - - Yoakum(ABL) Abilene MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ABL) Abilene MPO(AMA) Amarillo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (AMA) Amarillo MPO(ATL) Texarkana MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ATL) Texarkana MPO(AUS) CAMPO TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (AUS) CAMPO TMA(BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT & HOU) HGAC TMA(BMT) JHORTS MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BMT) JHORTS MPO(BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (BRY) Bryan-College Station MPO(CRP) Corpus Christi TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (CRP) Corpus Christi TMA(DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA 29.59 0.64 - - - - - - - 30.23 - 30.23 (DAL, FTW & PAR) NCTCOG TMA(ELP) El Paso TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (ELP) El Paso TMA(LRD) Laredo TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LRD) Laredo TMA(LBB) Lubbock TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (LBB) Lubbock TMA(ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (ODA) Midland-Odessa MPO(PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR) Sherman-Denison MPO(PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Harlinge-San Benito MPO(PHR) Hidalgo County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Hidalgo County TMA(PHR) Brownsville TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (PHR) Brownsville TMA(SJT) San Angelo MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (SJT) San Angelo MPO(SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (SAT) San Antonio-Bexar County TMA(TYL) Tyler MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Tyler MPO(TYL) Longview MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (TYL) Longview MPO(WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Killeen-Temple TMA(WAC) Waco MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WAC) Waco MPO(WFS) Wichita Falls MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (WFS) Wichita Falls MPO(YKM) Victoria MPO - - - - - - - - - - - - (YKM) Victoria MPOBridge - - - - - - - - - - - - BridgeTraffic - - - - - - - - - - - - TrafficDesign - - - - - - - - - - - - DesignFederal Railway-Highway Safety - - - - - - - - - - - - Federal Railway-Highway SafetyRailroad Grade Crossing - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Grade CrossingRailroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety Mitigation - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Crossing, Congestion & Safety MitigationRailroad Signal Maintenance - - - - - - - - - - - - Railroad Signal MaintenanceTexas Parks and Wildlife - - - - - - - - - - - - Texas Parks and WildlifeLandscape Incentive Awards - - - - - - - - - - - - Landscape Incentive AwardsAmericans with Disabilities Act - - - - - - - - - - - - Americans with Disabilities ActStatewide - - - 245.26 - - - - - 245.26 - 245.26 StatewideStatewide Unallocated - - - - - - - - - - - - Statewide Unallocated

Total 29.59$ 0.64$ -$ 245.26$ 40.24$ -$ -$ -$ 100.00$ 415.73$ -$ 415.73$ Total


10:29 AM 12/16/2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

MPO/TMA FY 13 Carryover

(Fed/Match) FY13 Recon Adjustment

Total FY 13 Carryover and

Recon Adjustment Current FY 14

UTP

Proposed FY 14 UTP with Carryover and Recon Adjustment

HGAC 31,250,000 - 31,250,000 75,700,000 106,950,000 JHORTS 16,822,500 - 16,822,500 - 16,822,500 NCTCOG* - - - 80,680,000 80,680,000 ELP TMA 4,562,500 - 4,562,500 8,940,000 13,502,500 Statewide 210,000 - 210,000 12,190,000 12,400,000 Statewide Unallocated - 50,373,767 50,373,767 - 50,373,767 Total 52,845,000 50,373,767 103,218,767 177,510,000 280,728,767

* NCTCOG FY13 Carryover will be zero, pending an FTR Adjustment.

CATEGORY 5 - CMAQ FY 2013 CARRYOVER WITH FEDERAL RECONCILIATION ADJUSTMENT

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

MPO/TMA FY 13 Carryover

(Fed/Match) FY13 Recon Adjustment

Total FY 13 Carryover and

Recon Adjustment Current FY 14

UTP

Proposed FY 14 UTP with

Carryover and Recon Adjustment

AUS* 8,420,000 7,727,736 16,147,736 57,010,000 73,157,736 HGAC 41,115,000 35,682,005 76,797,005 102,470,000 179,267,005 CRP (1,630,000) 2,774,067 1,144,067 6,330,000 7,474,067 NCTCOG 112,150,000 (15,755,567) 96,394,433 108,470,000 204,864,433 ELP 13,535,000 8,794,086 22,329,086 15,270,000 37,599,086 LRD* - - - 9,010,000 9,010,000 LBB* (120,000) (880,519) (1,000,519) 12,320,000 11,319,481 Hidalgo* 3,380,000 (587,273) 2,792,727 16,520,000 19,312,727 Brownsville* - - - 8,320,000 8,320,000 SAT 21,080,000 8,877,869 29,957,869 34,750,000 64,707,869 Killeen-Temple 4,025,000 66,432 4,091,432 4,300,000 8,391,432

201,955,000 46,698,836 248,653,836 374,770,000 623,423,836

*Adjusted to reflect prior reconcilliation amounts and FTR's that were applied in FY14 for CAMPO, Pharr-Hidalgo, Lubbock, Brownsville and Laredo

CATEGORY 7 - STP-MM FY 2013 CARRYOVER WITH FEDERAL RECONCILIATION ADJUSTMENT

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

2014 Unified Transportation Program Austin Page 1 of 1

Project Listing

Williamson County

REVISED0015-08-134

DistrictAUSTIN

MPOAUSTINCOUNTY

WILLIAMSON IH 35Limits From APPROX 0.1 MI N. OF BUD STOCKTON LP

Limits To APPROX 0.1 MI S. OF BUD STOCKTON LP

City Letting FY2014

1

Project Description REPLACE BRIDGE & APPROACHES

12Category

1

11

STRATEGIC PRIORITY

PREVENTIVE MAINT & REHAB

DISTRICT DISCRETIONARY

Total Project Cost InformationINFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

Preliminary Engineering $367,080

ROW & Utilities $1,007,000

Construction $7,491,432

Construction Engineering $558,112

Contingencies $0

Indirect Costs $361,836

Potential Change Orders $179,045

Total Project Cost $9,964,506

$3,000,000

$1,600,000

$2,700,000

Description Authorized$0

$0

$0

Other$0

$0

$0

Local$3,000,000

$1,600,000

$2,700,000

Total

Total $7,300,000 $0 $0 $7,300,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier

Revision Comments Add Category 12 Strategic Priority funds to accelerate project to June 2014

Version 12/16/2013 2:07:27 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

2014 Unified Transportation Program Beaumont Page 1 of 1

Project Listing

Orange County0028-14-100

DistrictBEAUMONT

MPOJEFFERSON-ORANGE-HARDICOUNTY

ORANGE IH 10Limits From AT LITTLE CYPRESS BAYOU

Limits To (STR 002814069)AND(STR 002814068)

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES

6Category

12

BRIDGE PROGRAM

STRATEGIC PRIORITY



ROW & Utilities $0



Contingencies $0




$5,610,000

$818,300


$0

Other$0

$0

Local$5,610,000

$818,300

Total

Total $6,428,300 $0 $0 $6,428,300

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier

Revision Comments Add project to 2014 UTP

0028-14-108DistrictBEAUMONT


ORANGE IH 10Limits From W OF ADAMS BAYOU, EAST

Limits To W OF SABINE RIVER BRIDGE

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description RECONSTRUCT MAIN LANES OF EXISTING 4 LANE FREEWAY

3Category

3

3

2U

PROP 12 PROGRAM 2

PROP 12 PROGRAM 2

PROP 12 PROGRAM 2

URBAN CORRIDOR


Preliminary Engineering $2,770,661



Construction Engineering $3,386,992

Contingencies $1,470,147

Indirect Costs $2,731,080

Potential Change Orders $2,261,764


$4,801,710

$39,429,689

$3,422,705

$8,890,000


$0

$0

$0

Other$0

$0

$0

$0

Local$4,801,710

$39,429,689

$3,422,705

$8,890,000

Total

Total $56,544,104 $0 $0 $56,544,104

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier

----------------------------------------------------Remaining Funding to be Determined----------------------------------------------------


0028-14-109DistrictBEAUMONT


ORANGE IH 10Limits From AT SH 87 AND T&NO RR

Limits To (STR 002814108 & 109)

CityORANGE

Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES

6Category

12

BRIDGE PROGRAM

STRATEGIC PRIORITY



ROW & Utilities $0



Contingencies $0




$13,250,000

$2,249,374


$0

Other$0

$0

Local$13,250,000

$2,249,374

Total

Total $15,499,374 $0 $0 $15,499,374

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier


Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

2014 Unified Transportation Program El Paso Page 1 of 4

Project Listing

El Paso County0001-01-058

DistrictEL PASO

MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO SH 20Limits From NM STATE LINE

Limits To SH 20 MESA

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description TRAFFIC OPERATION IMPROVEMENTS

5Category

12

CMAQ

CMAQ RECONCILIATION



ROW & Utilities $0



Contingencies $23,614




$1,077,448

$700,000


$0

Other$0

$0

Local$1,077,448

$700,000

Total

Total $1,777,448 $0 $0 $1,777,448

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



REVISED0924-06-381

DistrictEL PASO

MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO VALimits From COUNTYWIDE

Limits To .

City Letting FY2014

1

Project Description FORTY FOOT BUS PURCHASE 5 (DTC ALAMEDA & ZARAGOSA)

12Category

CMAQ RECONCILIATION



ROW & Utilities $0

Construction $540,000





Total Project Cost $665,172

$540,000Description Authorized

$0Other

$0Local

$540,000Total

Total $540,000 $0 $0 $540,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier


Revision Comments Increase Category 12 CMAQ Reconciliation funds

0924-06-451DistrictEL PASO

MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO VALimits From REGIONAL

Limits To .

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description BIKE PROG WILL PROVIDE MORE COMMUTER TRAVEL OPTIONS WITH 20- 25 BIKE STATIONS AND APPROX 180-200 BIKES

12Category

3

STP-MM RECONCILIATION

LOCAL



ROW & Utilities $0







$400,000

$0


$0

Other$0

$320,000

Local$400,000

$320,000

Total

Total $400,000 $0 $320,000 $720,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier


Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013


Project Listing


MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO VALimits From CITYWIDE

Limits To .

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description BICYCLE PROGRAM FY 2014

12Category

CMAQ RECONCILIATION



ROW & Utilities $0







$100,000Description Authorized

$0Other

$0Local

$100,000Total

Total $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO VALimits From CITYWIDE

Limits To .

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description ACTIVATE AND CUTOMIZE SMARTRECK MOBILE AND SMARTRECK

12Category

CMAQ RECONCILIATION



ROW & Utilities $0







$1,319,990Description Authorized

$0Other

$0Local

$1,319,990Total

Total $1,319,990 $0 $0 $1,319,990

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO CSLimits From CITYWIDE

Limits To .

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS

12Category

CMAQ RECONCILIATION



ROW & Utilities $0








$0Other

$0Local

$2,000,000Total

Total $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier


Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013


Project Listing


MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO IH 10Limits From VISCOUNT BLVD.

Limits To FM 659 (ZARAGOZA ROAD)

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description ADD 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION - OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

2MCategory

METRO CORRIDOR



ROW & Utilities $0








$0Other

$0Local

$15,000,000Total

Total $15,000,000 $0 $0 $15,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO LP 375Limits From SPUR 601

Limits To IRON MEDICS INTERCHANGE

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description CONSTRUCT AUXILIARY LANES AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT SS601

7Category

12

1

STP-MM

CMAQ RECONCILIATION




ROW & Utilities $0







$425,000

$1,769,459

$600,000


$0

$0

Other$0

$0

$0

Local$425,000

$1,769,459

$600,000

Total

Total $2,794,459 $0 $0 $2,794,459

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO IH 10Limits From AIRWAY BLVD

Limits To VISCOUNT BLVD

City Letting FY2015

1

Project Description RAMP IMPROVEMENTS

2MCategory

METRO CORRIDOR



ROW & Utilities $0








$0Other

$0Local

$8,000,000Total

Total $8,000,000 $0 $0 $8,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013


Project Listing

REVISED2121-04-093

DistrictEL PASO

MPOEL PASOCOUNTY

EL PASO IH 10Limits From IH 10 @ LP 375

Limits To .

City Letting FY2015

1

Project Description INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS/CONSTRUCTION OF DC S LP375 SB TO EB AND NB TO EB

2MCategory

METRO CORRIDOR



ROW & Utilities $0








$0Other

$0Local

$13,000,000Total

Total $13,000,000 $0 $0 $13,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier


Revision Comments Add Category 2 Metropolitan Corridor funds

Presidio County0104-10-006

DistrictEL PASO

MPOCOUNTYPRESIDIO US 67

Limits From AT PRESIDIO INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE

Limits To .

City Letting FY2018

Unranked

Project Description WIDENING OF INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE AT PRESIDIO

3Category

LOCAL



ROW & Utilities $0







$0Description Authorized

$0Other

$23,600,000Local

$23,600,000Total

Total $0 $0 $23,600,000 $23,600,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier


Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

2014 Unified Transportation Program Houston Page 1 of 1

Project Listing

Fort Bend County

REVISED0027-12-105

DistrictHOUSTON

MPOHOUSTON-GALVESTONCOUNTY

FORT BEND US 59Limits From W OF SH 36

Limits To W OF FM 762

City Letting FY2014

1

Project Description WIDEN TO 6-LANE RURAL FREEWAY, FRONTAGE ROADS, ITS AND TSM WITH GRADE SEPARATION

12Category

STRATEGIC PRIORITY











$0Other

$0Local

$52,000,000Total

Total $52,000,000 $0 $0 $52,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier


Revision Comments Revise Category 12 Strategic Priority funds

0027-12-106DistrictHOUSTON

MPOHOUSTON-GALVESTONCOUNTY

FORT BEND US 59Limits From SP 10

Limits To W OF SH 36

City Letting FY2014

Unranked

Project Description WIDEN TO 6 LN RURAL FREEWAY, FRONTAGE ROADS, ITS & TMS

12Category

1

STRATEGIC PRIORITY











$38,000,000

$27,375,000


$0

Other$0

$0

Local$38,000,000

$27,375,000

Total

Total $65,375,000 $0 $0 $65,375,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier

Revision Comments Add CSJ to contract CSJ 0027-12-105

Harris County0271-17-901

DistrictHOUSTON

MPOCOUNTYHARRIS IH 610

Limits From POST OAK BLVD

Limits To IH 10 (W)

City Letting FY2017

Unranked

Project Description CONSTRUCT BUS/EXPRESS FACILITY

3Category

LOCAL



ROW & Utilities $0








$0Other

$20,000,000Local

$20,000,000Total

Total $0 $0 $20,000,000 $20,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

2014 Unified Transportation Program Waco Page 1 of 1

Project Listing

Mc Lennan County0015-01-171

DistrictWACO

MPOWACOCOUNTY

MC LENNAN IH 35Limits From S LP 340

Limits To N LP 340

City Letting FY2019

Unranked

Project Description RECONST.,WIDEN MAINLANES FROM 6 TO 8,RECONST.FRONTAGE RD AND EXTEND FRONTAGE ROADS WHERE DISCONTINUOUS AND REALIGN RAMPS

2UCategory

URBAN CORRIDOR











$0Other

$0Local

$18,770,000Total

Total $18,770,000 $0 $0 $18,770,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

2014 Unified Transportation Program Yoakum Page 1 of 1

Project Listing

Wharton County0089-06-081

DistrictYOAKUM

MPOCOUNTYWHARTON US 59

Limits From BU 59 SOUTH OF EL CAMPO

Limits To FM 1163

City Letting FY2023

Unranked

Project Description UPGRADE TO RURAL FREWAY I-69 SYSTEM PROJECT (PROJECT B)

3Category

LOCAL



ROW & Utilities $0








$0Other

$4,000,000Local

$4,000,000Total

Total $0 $0 $4,000,000 $4,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



0089-07-133DistrictYOAKUM

MPOCOUNTYWHARTON US 59

Limits From 0.17 MI. WEST OF SH 71

Limits To 0.12 MI. EAST OF FM 1163

City Letting FY2023

Unranked

Project Description CONSTRUCT FRONTAGE ROAD

3Category

LOCAL



ROW & Utilities $0








$0Other

$4,000,000Local

$4,000,000Total

Total $0 $0 $4,000,000 $4,000,000

Programmed Funding

CSJ

Ranking Tier



Version 12/16/2013 2:07:29 PM

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Account Balance

CAMPO 734,282,287

HGAC 544,977,757

NCTCOG 465,486,222

Statewide 296,881,188

Public Transit 15,000,000

Total: 2,056,627,454

Transportation Development Credit Balances

as of December 2, 2013

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

VIII-4

0 C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

vels

V

ers

ion

: 11

/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

Table VIII-2 2014 UTP Programming Information by Category

Category Programming Instructions Ranking Index or Allocation Formula Funding and Project Scope/Description

1 Preventive

Maintenance

and

Rehabilitation

Commission allocation program distributed to Districts by PM and Rehabilitation formulas.

Entire allocation may be used on preventive maintenance or rehabilitation projects or combination.

Allocation does not include Energy Sector Impacts.

Projects selected and managed by the district based on a prioritized list.

District updates project data in UTP Programming Template and Design and Construction Information System (DCIS).

Each district shall receive an allocation based on this funding target formula: Preventive Maintenance 3 basic criteria are weighted by %. A total allocation % is calculated by district with 98% directed toward roadway maintenance & 2% directed toward bridge maintenance.

65% On system lane miles

33% Pavement distress score pace factor

2% Square footage of on system bridge deck area

Rehabilitation

32.5% 3-Year Average Lane - Miles of pavement distress scores < 70

20% Vehicle miles traveled per lane mile (On system)

32.5% Equivalent Single Axle Load Miles (On & Off system & Interstate)

15% Pavement distress score pace factor

Federal 90% State 10% Or Federal 80% State 20% Or 100% State (Chief Financial Officer (CFO) approval)

Preventive Maintenance - Work to preserve, rather than improve, the structural integrity of the pavement and/or structure. Examples of preventive maintenance activities include asphalt concrete pavement (ACP) overlays (2” thick maximum); seal coats; cleaning and sealing joints and cracks; patching concrete pavement; shoulder repair; scour countermeasures; cleaning and painting steel members to include application of other coatings; restore drainage systems; cleaning and sealing bridge joints; micro-surfacing; bridge deck protection; milling or bituminous level-up; clean, lubricate and reset bearings; and clean rebar/strand and patch structural concrete and seal cracks.

Rehabilitation - funds can be expended on any highway on the state highway system, and are intended for the rehabilitation (including approved preventive maintenance measures) of existing main lanes, structures and frontage roads. Rehabilitation of an existing two-lane highway to a Super 2 highway may be funded within this category.

The installation and/or rehabilitation of signs and their appurtenances, pavement markings, thermoplastic striping, traffic signals, and illumination systems, including minor roadway modifications to improve operations also allowed under this category. Funds can be used to install new traffic signals as well as modernize existing signals.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Ve

rsio

n: 1

1/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

ve

ls

VIII-4

1


2 Metropolitan

and Urban

Corridor

Projects

Commission distributes funds to MPO’s by the Category 2 Metro and Urban formulas.

This UTP does not distribute additional funds in this category.

Total project cost allocation.

Projects may be reprioritized during the development of the UTP.

Projects selected and ranked by MPOs in consultation with TxDOT.

District updates project data in UTP Programming Template and DCIS.

Each MPO shall receive an allocation based on this funding target formula: TMA = 87% of Category 2 Funding Allocation TMA Distribution Formula:

30% Total vehicle miles traveled (on & off system)

17% Population

10% Lane miles (on system)

14% Vehicle miles traveled (trucks only) (on system)

7% Percentage of census population below the federal poverty level

15% Based on Congestion

7% Fatal and incapacitating crashes MPO operating in areas that are non-TMA = 13% of Category 2 Funding Allocation MPO Distribution Formula:

20% Total vehicle miles traveled (on & off system)

25% Population

8% Lane miles (on system)

15% Vehicle miles traveled (trucks only) (on system)

4% Percentage of census population below the federal poverty level

8% Centerline miles (on system)

10% Congestion

10% Fatal and incapacitating crashes

Federal 80% Local 20% Or Federal 80% State 20% Or 100% State (CFO approval) Mobility and added capacity projects along a corridor that improves transportation facilities in order to decrease travel time and level or duration of traffic congestion, and to increase the safe and efficient movement of people and freight in metropolitan and urbanized areas.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

VIII-4

2 C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

vels

V

ers

ion

: 11

/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM


3 Non-

Traditionally

Funded

Transportation

Projects

Project Selection and/or allocation based on legislation, Commission approved Minute Orders and/or anticipated local commitments.

The UTP does not authorize any new projects in the Pass-Through Finance Program.

UTP Programming Template includes previously approved and programmed projects.

Projects in the UTP Programming Template reflect the current allocation in appropriate let year.


District ranks projects.

Determined by legislation, Commission approved Minute Order, and local government commitments.

Federal 80% State 20% Or 100% State (CFO approval) Or 100% Local Or Varies by agreement and rules Transportation-related projects that qualify for funding from sources not traditionally part of the SHF including state bond financing under programs such as Proposition 12 (General Obligation Bonds), Proposition 14, TMF , pass-through financing, regional revenue and concession funds, and local participation funding.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Ve

rsio

n: 1

1/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

ve

ls

VIII-4

3


4 Statewide

Connectivity

Corridor

Projects

Project-specific selection by Commission.




Selections based on engineering analysis of projects on three corridor types: Mobility Corridors - based on congestion. Connectivity Corridors - 2-lane roadways requiring upgrade to 4-lane divided. Strategic Corridors - strategic corridor additions to the state highway network. An example would be the Ports-to-Plains corridor.

Federal 80% State 20% Or 100% State (CFO approval) Mobility and added capacity projects on major state highway system corridors, which provide statewide connectivity between urban areas and corridors. Composed of a highway connectivity network that includes:

The Texas Trunk System.

NHS

Connections from the Texas Trunk System or the NHS to major ports on international borders or Texas water ports.

5 Congestion

Mitigation and

Air Quality

Improvement

Commission allocation program.


Total Project Cost allocation.


Distributed by population weighted by air quality severity to non-attainment areas. Non-attainment areas designated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Federal 80%

Local 20%

Or

Federal 80%

State 20%

Addresses attainment of National Ambient Air

Quality Standard in non-attainment areas (currently

Dallas–Fort Worth, Houston, and El Paso). Funds

cannot be used to add capacity for single occupancy

vehicles.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

VIII-4

4 C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

vels

V

ers

ion

: 11

/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM


6 Structures

Replacement &

Rehabilitation

Highway Bridge

Program

Federal

Railroad Grade

Separation

Program

Statewide allocation program set by Commission.

Projects selected and managed by the Bridge Division based on prioritized listing.

RGS projects are selected and managed by Bridge Division based on a Cost-benefit Index for at-grade railroad crossing elimination projects and a Prioritization Ranking for railroad underpass replacement or rehabilitation projects.

District coordinates UTP Development project list with BRG.

BRG updates project data in UTP Programming Template.

BRG ranks projects.

Highway Bridge Program: Projects are selected statewide based on a listing of eligible bridges prioritized first by Deficiency Categorization (Structurally Deficient followed by Functionally Obsolete) and then by Sufficiency Ratings. Railroad Grade Separation: Cost-benefit Index that utilizes vehicle and train traffic, accident rates, casualty costs, and personnel and equipment delay costs for selecting at-grade railroad crossing elimination projects. Prioritization Ranking that utilizes vertical clearance and roadway characteristics for selecting replacement or rehabilitation of railroad underpass projects

Highway Bridge Program Federal 90%; State 10% Or Federal 80% State 20% Or Federal 80%; State 10% Local 10% Or State 100% (CFO Approval) Replaces or rehabilitates eligible bridges on and off the state highway system that are considered functionally obsolete or structurally deficient. Bridges with a sufficiency rating below 50 are eligible for replacement. Bridges with a sufficiency rating of 80 or less are eligible for rehabilitation. A minimum of 15% of the funding must go toward replacement and rehabilitation of off-system bridges. Railroad Grade Separation: Federal 80% State 20% Eliminates at-grade highway-railroad crossings through the construction of highway overpasses or railroad underpasses, and rehabilitates or replaces deficient railroad underpasses on the state highway system.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Ve

rsio

n: 1

1/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

ve

ls

VIII-4

5


7 Metropolitan

Mobility &

Rehabilitation


Allocation based on projected federal funding levels.




Federal program distributed to MPO’s with an urbanized area population of 200,000 or greater (TMA’s).

Federal 80% Local 20% Or Federal 80% State 20% State Transportation needs within the Transportation Management Areas (TMA). Projects selected by the MPOs.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

VIII-4

6 C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

vels

V

ers

ion

: 11

/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM


8 Safety–

Highway Safety

Improvement

Program

High Risk Rural

Roads Sub

Program

Safety Bond

Program


Projects selected and managed by the TRF based on a prioritized list.

District coordinates UTP development project list with TRF.

District updates project data in UTP Programming Template.

TRF updates letting dates in DCIS and manages statewide allocation.

District ranks projects in consultation with the TRF Division.

Highway Safety Improvement Program: Safety Improvement Index (SII) High Risk Rural Road Roads Sub Program Safety Improvement Index (SII) Safety Bond Program: Safety Improvement Index (SII), roadway safety characteristics and anticipated time required to complete the candidate project.

Highway Safety Improvement Program: Federal 90% State 10% Safety-related projects on and off the state highway system. Projects are evaluated using three years of crash data, and ranked by Safety Improvement Index. Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of HSIP funds. Safety related construction and operational improvements on high risk rural roads. High risk rural roads are roadways functionally classified as rural major or minor collectors or rural local roads with a fatal and incapacitating injury crash rate above the statewide average for these functional classes of roadways; or likely to experience an increase in traffic volumes that leads to a crash rate in excess of the average statewide rate. Safe Routes to School projects previously authorized remains in Category 8. Future Safe Routes to School projects will be managed under the TAP program guidelines in Category 9. Safety Bond Program: 100% State Allocations for the safety bond program are approved by the Texas Transportation Commission, with the program managed as an allocation program on a statewide basis. Projects evaluated, ranked, prioritized and selected by the Traffic Operations Division.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Ve

rsio

n: 1

1/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

ve

ls

VIII-4

7


8 Safety–Federal

Railway–

Highway Safety

Program


Projects selected and managed by the Rail Division based on a prioritized list.

District coordinates UTP Development project list with the Rail Division.


District ranks projects in consultation with Rail Division.

Railroad Crossing Index

Federal 90% State 10% Funding set aside from HSIP for safety improvements in order to reduce the number of fatalities, injuries and crashes at public grade crossings. Installation of automatic railroad warning devices at railroad crossings on and off state highway system, selected from statewide inventory list which is prioritized by index (# of trains per day, train speed, ADT, school buses per day, type of existing warning device, train-involved crashes within prior five years, etc.) Provide incentive payments to local governments for closing crossings. Improve signal preemption and coordination of train control signals. Improve passive warning devices to comply with federal guidelines.

9 Transportation

Enhancements

Project Specific Selection by Commission.

Not reauthorized under MAP-21.

Funds distributed to satisfy commitments made from previous program calls.

DES Division updates UTP Programming Template and ranks projects in consultation with Districts.

District updates project data and letting dates in DCIS.

DES Division manages statewide allocation.

TxDOT staff and FHWA evaluate for eligibility and make recommendations to Commission. TMAs select and rank projects within their areas in consultation with TxDOT.

Federal 80% Local 20% Or Federal 80% State 20% Projects defined as transportation enhancements, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, bicycle education and safety activities, acquisition of scenic easements, tourist and welcome centers, landscaping, historic preservation, rehab and operation of historic transportation buildings, preservation of abandoned railways, control and removal of outdoor advertising, archeological planning and research, environmental mitigation and establishment of transportation museums.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

VIII-4

8 C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

vels

V

ers

ion

: 11

/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM


9 Transportation

Enhancements

(Cont.)

Safety Rest

Area Program


Projects selected and managed by the MNT Division based on a prioritized list.

Design Division coordinates UTP Development project list with the MNT Division.

Design Division updates project data in UTP Template and ranks projects.

MNT Division updates project data and letting dates in DCIS.

DES Division manages statewide allocation.

Selection criteria includes: travel corridors, appropriate size and spacing of rest areas, customer desired features, and operational functions.

Federal 80% State 20% Projects to renovate, build, and relocate safety rest areas and visitor centers along the state highway system. Small amount of program funds used for safety rest area repairs. Other federal-aid or state funds may be used for non-qualifying repair activities.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Ve

rsio

n: 1

1/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

ve

ls

VIII-4

9


9 Transportation

Alternatives

Program


Federal program created by MAP-21.

Includes distribution of funds based on population.

TMA’s get direct allocation for program calls.

TAP statewide allocation and program calls to be managed by the DES Division.

DES Division coordinates UTP Development project list with the District.

DES updates project data in UTP Template and ranks projects.


TxDOT staff and FHWA evaluate for eligibility and make recommendations to Commission for Statewide allocation. TMAs select and rank projects within their areas in consultation with TxDOT and FHWA.

Federal 80% State 20% Or Federal 80% Local 20% Projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; safe routes to school projects; and projects for the planning, design or construction of boulevards and other roadways largely in the right of way of former interstate system routes or other divided highways.

10 Supplemental

Transportation

TPWD




Locations selected and prioritized by TPWD.

State 100% Construction and rehabilitation of roadways within or adjacent to state parks, fish hatcheries, etc. Subject to Memorandum of Agreement between TxDOT and TPWD.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

VIII-5

0 C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

vels

V

ers

ion

: 11

/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM


10 Supplemental

Transportation

Projects–

Green Ribbon

Landscape

Improvement

Program

Curb Ramp

Program

Miscellaneous

Landscape

Incentive

Awards

Program

Statewide allocation programs.

Projects selected and managed by the Design Division.

Design Division updates UTP Programming Template and ranks projects.


Design Division manages statewide allocations.

Projects are selected by the Design Division with concurrence from the MPO if within the MPO jurisdiction.

Green Ribbon: Allocations based on one-half percent of the estimated letting capacity for the TxDOT districts which contain air quality non-attainment or near non-attainment counties Curb Ramp: Projects are selected based on conditions of curb ramps or location of intersections without ramps. Landscape Incentive Awards: Funding is distributed to ten locations based on results of Keep Texas Beautiful Awards Program.

State 100% (CFO Approval) Or Federal 80% State 20% Green Ribbon: Address new landscape development and establishment projects within districts that have air quality non-attainment or near non-attainment counties (projects to plant trees and shrubs to help mitigate the effects of air pollution). Curb Ramp: This program addresses construction or replacement of curb ramps at on-system intersections to make the intersections more accessible to pedestrians with disabilities. Landscape Incentive Awards: Program allows the department to negotiate and execute joint landscape development projects in nine locations based on population categories in association with the Keep Texas Beautiful Governor’s Community Achievement Awards Program. The awards recognize participating cities or communities efforts in litter control, quality of life issues and beautification programs and projects.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Ve

rsio

n: 1

1/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

ve

ls

VIII-5

1


10 Supplemental

Transportation

Projects–

Coordinated

Border

Infrastructure

Program

Supplemental

Transportation

Projects

(Federal)

Commission allocation program by formula.

Not reauthorized under MAP-21.

Funding level is set based on projects identified by the districts and approved by FHWA.



Coordinated Border Infrastructure: Allocation Formula

20% Incoming commercial trucks

30% Incoming personal motor vehicles & buses

25% weight of incoming cargo by commercial trucks

25% Number of land border ports of entry

Supplemental Transportation Projects (Federal): Not applicable.

Federal 100% Or Federal 80% Local 20% Or Federal 80% State 20% Coordinated Border Infrastructure: Projects selected in program to improve the safe movement of motor vehicles at or across the land border between the United States and Mexico. Supplemental Transportation Projects (Federal): Federal Discretionary and Congressional High-Priority Projects.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

VIII-5

2 C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

vels

V

ers

ion

: 11

/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM


10 Supplemental

Transportation

Projects–

Railroad

Rehabilitation

and

Improvement

Projects

Railroad Grade

Crossing and

Re-planking

Program

Railroad Signal

Maintenance

Program


Projects selected and managed by the Rail Division based on a prioritized list.


District ranks projects in consultation with the Rail Division.

District updates project completion data in Rail Division crossing inventory.

Railroad Grade Crossing and Re-planking Program: Condition of crossing’s riding surface and cost per vehicle using crossing. Railroad Signal Maintenance Program: Number of crossings and type of automatic devices present at each.

State 100% Railroad Grade Crossing and Re-planking Program: Replacement of rough railroad crossing surfaces on the state highway system (approximately 50 installations per year statewide). Project selection based on conditions of the riding surface (highway, railroad and drainage) and cost per vehicle using the crossing. Railroad Signal Maintenance Program: Contributions to each railroad company based on number of state highway system crossings and type of automatic devices present at each crossing.

11 District

Discretionary


Projects selected and managed by the District



Minimum $2.5 million allocation to each district per legislative mandate. If additional funds are distributed, the below formula is used: Allocation Formula

70% On-system vehicle miles traveled

20% On-system lane miles

10% Annual truck vehicle miles

traveled

Federal 80% State 20% Or Federal 80% Local 20% Or State 100% (CFO Approval) Projects selected at the district’s discretion.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Ve

rsio

n: 1

1/1

/2

01

3 4

:41

:00

PM

C

ate

go

ries, C

od

es, &

Le

ve

ls

VIII-5

3


12 Strategic

Priority

CMAQ &

STP-MM

Reconciliation

Project-Specific Selection by Commission for Strategic Priority.

Allocation of funds for CMAQ & STP-MM Reconciliation.


District ranks projects in consultation with MPOs for allocation.

Strategic Priority: Selected by Texas Transportation Commission. CMAQ & STP-MM Reconciliation: Allocations provided to MPO’s. Projects selected and ranked by the MPO in consultation with TxDOT.

Federal 80% State 20% Or Federal 80% Local 20% Or State 100% (CFO Approval) Commission selects projects to: promote economic opportunity; increase efficiency on military; deployment routes or to retain military assets in response to the Federal Military Base Realignment and Closure Report; and maintain the ability to respond to both man-made and natural emergencies.

PA Programming

Authority

Planning funds distributed by formula.

May be programmed to account for inflation costs, meet funding shortfall/gap, or to initiate advanced planning project activity.

Allocation Formula

70% On-system vehicle miles traveled

20% On-system lane miles

10% Annual truck vehicle miles traveled

Focus on advanced planning activities.

EXHIBIT A

12/16/2013

Minute Order - Dec. 19, 2013ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/adm/2013/documents/... · 2013-12-19 · District/Division Rehab PM Metro Urban STWD CMAQ Bridge STP MM Safety TE Misc

Documents