Mining Accountability Data: Making It Real March 6, 2014 Deb Duffy, MORIC.

Mining Accountability Data: Making It Real

March 6, 2014Deb Duffy, MORIC

Data Questions

What does the data tell you?

What does the data not tell you?

What are the implications for change?

How would you plan for this at the district level?

Holcomb, 1998

MATH GRADES 3-8MAJOR CLUSTER RESULTS

60.8%

54.3%

58.6%

51.9% 52.7%

46.4%

NYS Math Avg %

DRAFT

63%

50%

66.7%

53%

61.1%

45.5%

55.6%

42.3%

64.7%

NYS Math Avg %

DRAFT

NYS Math Avg %

63.2% 63.6%

53.6% 50% 50%

40.9%

50%54.5%

57.1%

DRAFT

63%

50%

66.7%

53%

61.1%

45.5%

55.6%

42.3%

64.7%

NYS Math Avg %

DRAFT

NYS Math Avg %

63.2% 63.6%

53.6% 50% 50%

40.9%

50%54.5%

57.1%

DRAFT

50%

66.7%

42.3%

64.7%63% 61.1%

45.5%

52.9%55.6%

NYS Math Avg %

DRAFT

63.2% 63.6%

53.6%50% 50%

40.9%

50%

54.5%57.1%

NYS Math Avg %

DRAFT

RELEASED QUESTION RESULTSREGIONAL: MATH 2013

60.8%

54.3%

51.9%

58.6%

46.4%

52.7%

NYS Math Major Cluster (Combined) %

DRAFT

Data Questions

What does the data tell you?

What does the data not tell you?

What are the implications for change?

How would you plan for this at the district level?

Holcomb, 1998

ELA GRADES 3 -- 8READING VS WRITINGINFORMATIONAL TEXT VS LITERATURE

Gr 3 Avg: 52.7% Gr 4 Avg: 56.4% Gr 5 Avg: 56%

Gr 6 Avg: 60% Gr 7 Avg: 60.6% Gr 8 Avg: 62.1%

NYS Read/Write Subscore Avg %

DRAFT

DRAFT

NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 52.7%

NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 56.4%

NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 56%

DRAFT

NYS Reading/Writing Avg 60%

NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 60.6%

NYS Reading/Writing Avg: 62.1%

NYS Reading Avg: 54.8%

NYS Reading Avg: 61.3% NYS Reading Avg:

57.1%

DRAFT

NYS Reading Avg: 61%

NYS Reading Avg: 59.5%

NYS Reading Avg: 59.5%

DRAFT

NYS Writing Avg: 50%

NYS Writing Avg: 50%

NYS Writing Avg: 54.2%

DRAFT

NYS Writing Avg: 62.5%NYS Writing Avg:

58.3%

NYS Writing Avg: 66.7%

DRAFT

Writing Avg: 66.7%Writing Avg: 62.5%

Writing Avg: 58.3%

Writing Avg: 50%Writing Avg: 50%Writing Avg: 54.2%

NYS Writing Subscore Avg %

DRAFT

RELEASED QUESTION RESULTSREGIONAL: ELA 2013

54.8% 50%

61.3%

50%

57.1%

61%

54.2%

58.3%

59.5%

62.5% 60%

66.7%

DRAFT

Released Constructed Response

Gr. 3-6 all LiteratureGr. 7-8 all Informational Text

Data Questions

What does the data tell you?

What does the data not tell you?

What are the implications for change?

How would you plan for this at the district level?

Holcomb, 1998

HIGH SCHOOL ASSESSMENTSREGENTS: ELA & US HISTORY

2013

DRAFT

HS REGIONAL ASSESSMENTSPARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT & ECONOMICS

January 2013 – January 2014

14 pts

24 pts

24 pts

16 pts

24 pts 30 pts

What Did You Learn?