Milk Vita realities and reaching out to dreams of millionscdn.aphca.org/dmdocuments/Events/Dairy_Asia_21-23_May_14... · Milk Vita –realities and reaching out to dreams of millions

Milk Vita –realities and reaching out to dreams of millions

Milk Vita & its activities

Dairy marketing performances

Nutrition security, socio-economic & public health performances of smallholder dairying

Challenges ahead

Milk Vita or Bangladesh Milk Producers` Cooperative Union

Ltd. (BMPCUL) established in 1973

State patronized Eastern Milk Producers’ Co-operative Union

Ltd. in 1965

ASTO Dairy of the National Co-operative Marketing Society of

the then East Pakistan

Private Eastern Milk Products Ltd. in 1952

Pioneered by M. M. Rahman in 1946

FAO & DANIDA recommended following the success of AMUL Anand Milk Federation Union

Ltd., India in 1973

Govt. of Bangladesh

Rural Development

& Cooperatives

Division

Milk Vita

Ministry of Fisheries & Livestock

Dept. of Livestock Services

Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute

Milk Vita-a public shared dairy cooperative organization & its vision (www.milkvita.org)

Organizing Societies

Fair milk price

Dairy Development

Districts having milk shed areas of Milk Vita

10.1-61.4%milk

1.01-10% milk

0.01-1.0% milk

Non MV area

Marketing share of Milk Vita & Private Entrepreneurs

Milk & Other

products

Nation

al

Total

Dairy

entrepreneurs

% Share of the

total

Milk

Vita Privates

Milk

Vita Privates

L.Milk Daily

x103 Kg 399 184 215 46.0 54.0

Dairy products (xTon/year)

Pw. milk 585 385 200 65.8 34.2

Fl. milk 912 270 642 29.6 70.4 I. Cream 19475 2190 17285 11.2 88.8 Butter 1004 730 274 72.7 27.3

Butter oil 865 548 317 63.4 36.6

Curd 1865 291 1574 15.6 84.4

Milk Vita takes lead in powder milk, butter & butter oil production

Private entrepreneurs together take lead in liquid milk, flav. Milk, Ice cream & curd production

Cattle genotypes in milk supported areas

LocalPabn

aSahiwal

Friesian

Jersey

AllGenotype

Heifers:Cows 0.94 0.87 1.14 1.20 1.88 1.21

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00 Heifers:Cows

Local Pabna Sahiwal Friesian Jersey

Native Crossbreds

% Breeds 26.02 5.30 5.51 48.40 14.77

Total Cows 29067 5923 6153 54083 16505

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

Nu

mb

er

of

Co

ws

% o

f to

tal C

ow

s

Type of genotypes

Friesian crosses are 48.4%

Natives are being replaced by Non-natives Jersey cross replacers have topped others

Input support-Fodder seeds

0

50

100

150

200

250

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

Mill

ion

Cu

ttin

gs

Distribution of Napier cuttings (Millions)

0.0

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0

1000.0

1200.0

0.0 2000.0 4000.0 6000.0

Fod

de

r la

nd

, De

cim

al

Cultivable land, Decimal

Fodder cultivation with land availability

i) Milk Vita sourced HYV Napier from BLRI & supplied them to farmers

ii) BLRI conserve, screen & improve fodder for introduction into cropping system of different regions

Even a land poor farmer cultivate fodder using leased in land

Input supports and milk & product marketing

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

19

91

-92

19

93

-94

19

95

-96

19

97

-98

19

99

-00

20

01

-02

20

03

-04

20

05

-06

20

07

-08

20

09

-10

20

11

-12 Val

ue

ad

de

d p

rod

uct

s, 1

03 t

on

s

Liq

uid

milk

, 10

3 t

on

s

Trend in milk & product marketing

Liquid milk Value added products

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

19

91

-92

19

94

-95

19

97

-98

20

00

-01

20

03

-04

20

06

-07

20

09

-10

20

12

-13

Soci

etie

s

10

3 T

raet

s /V

acci

ne

s/A

I

Trend in society formation and input support

Vet Treats Vaccination

AI-services Societies

Society number, AI & Vaccination

Vet treatment

Milk=2.43 + 3.09*year

Products fall recently

Balance sheet (x106 US$)

Years Income Expenditure Profit

2006-07 33.6 33.6 0.06

2007-08 33.6 32.0 1.50

2008-09 46.5 44.3 2.19

2009-10 53.4 50.8 2.58

2010-11 50.4 48.8 1.60

2011-12 51.6 49.6 2.05

2012-13 58.5 56.3 2.21 0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

20

06

-07

20

07

-08

20

08

-09

20

09

-10

20

10

-11

20

11

-12

20

12

-13

Trend in Profit (x106US$)

Financially profitable; @ about

4.0%

Socio economic performance indicators of dairying (a) -a source of income even for a landless farmer

y = 16.089x - 22.636 R² = 0.8203

0.0

1000.0

2000.0

3000.0

4000.0

5000.0

6000.0

7000.0

8000.0

9000.0

0 100 200 300 400 500

Monthly income (US$) from daily milk production (Litre)

Landless

Marginal

SmallMedium

LargeAll

Category

Income 887 780 997 597 685 789

Profit 115 78 299 143 253 178

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Monthly income & profit (US$) of different farm category

Profit depends on daily milk yield of a farm (Y= 16.09*Lit. Milk - 22.64)

Monthly profit varied from US$ 78 -299/farm

(b) -a source of livelihood & employment

y = 34.726e0.0126x R² = 0.8954

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

10.0 30.0 50.0 70.0 90.0

x10

3 F

arm

ers

x103 tons milk

Relation between milk production (Tonsx103) & member (103)

About 67.8% of annual income of almost 35 families comes from 1.0

ton of liquid milk production

y = 0.7925ln(x) - 0.9339 R² = 0.533

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 100 200 300 400 500

Daily litres milk & employment (Man days)

A dairy farm having average 28 total cattle including 11.0 milking cows hire 1.94 additional man days daily.

©–a source of family nutrition

y = 0.0071x + 1.3932 R² = 0.3117

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 50

10

0

15

0

20

0

25

0

30

0

35

0

40

0

45

0

Kg

milk

/day

Daily milk production, Kg

Daily milk production and family milk intake

Av. 1.39 Kg milk/day is

available to a farm family

(d)- a resource for women empowerment

RuralStructu

reddairy

Peri-urbandairy

Female 41.3 45.7 30.1

Male 58.7 54.3 69.9

020406080

100120

Share (%) of family labour in dairying

0

5

10

0 50

0

10

00

15

00

20

00

25

00

Fem

ale

far

me

r n

um

be

r

Cattle number

Cattle number distribution to female farmers

91.2%

8.82%

0

50

100

Male Female

Gender share in dairy farming

Females share 30% - 46% of dairy activities

8.82% is the owner of dairy farm

Keeps low number of animal/farm

Dairying-a bio-enterprise for pollution control

y = 0.1051x-0.643 R² = 0.8861

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0 5 10 15 20

KgC

H4/K

g m

ilk

Kg milk yield/day

Relation between enteric CH4 production and daily milk yield of cows of Bangladesh

Items Feed base Genetics Seasons

Good Poor Sig. Local Crosses Sig. Dry Wet Sig.

Feeding and Nutrition

Live weight, Kg 351 215 p<0.00 248 319 p<0.00 284 282 NS

Daily DMI,

Kg/head

8.53 5.4 p<0.00 5.75 8.17 p<0.00 6.99 6.93 NS

Milk Yield, Kg 6.76 3.67 p<0.00 3.26 7.18 p<0.00 5.27 5.17 NS

Milk Fat% 3.96 3.73 NS 3.96 3.73 NS 3.96 3.73 NS

Enteric CH4 production

Kg CH4/Kg Milk 0.035 0.07 p<0.00 0.069 0.036 p<0.00 0.055 0.050 NS

Emission Factor,

Kg CH4/head/year

66.4 61.5 p<0.05 57.8 76.1 p<0.00 63.9 63.9 NS

Better feeding reduced KgCH4/Kg milk Better genotypes reduced KgCH4/Kg milk No seasonal impacts on enteric CH4 production Dairy development may support safe environment

Dairying-a one step service for food, bio-energy & water

TotalExpenditure

GrossReturn

Net Return

US$ 14038 19514 5476

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Balance Sheet of 2012 of Tearband

Community Dairy

Bio Gas Plant

Gas

Water

Elec

tric

ity

Tearband Community Bio Gas Plant (On-Farm) Performance of 2012 (Sarker & Uddin, 2013)

Feeding 2000 Kg waste/day Produce gas- 72 to 108 m3

Bio gas to 42 families & 2 dairy farms Electricity to 28 Families Bio-fertilizer: Daily 500 to 600 Kg Water supply to 37 Families

Average

response in

six (6) months

Schools Sig.

Cont

rol

Milk

Fed

Height

increase, cm

1.77 2.96 p<0.

000

Weight gain ,

Kg

1.44 2.65 p<0.

001

Attend.

increase, %

- 9.33 -

Passing, %

increase

- 16.3 -

School Milk feeding program of FAO

FAO has been implementing a tri-country SDD programme financed by the CFC & the APHCA

in BANGLADESH

As one of the SDDP activities, Milk Vita is donating daily @200.0ml/head milk to 2039 school children including 1037 girls

Increased height & weight A longer demo period required An in-built system in the local govt. or the support of govt. safety net program could be options for its sustainability

Way forwards

Domestic production growth

Domestic growth, % 2.68 Buffalo share of 2.29% in milk production may be increased Deficit of >45% energy & >75% DCP supply warrants year round quality fodder supply & adoption of feed value addition technology to minimize supply & demand mismatch round a year

Import growth, % 18.8 Annual per capita availability, Kg

24.8

Annual per capita target, kg

91.3

Widening of dairy marketing

Structured market Middlemen share Local market share MV covers of total cows Private Entreps.

7.64% 34%-39% 52%-54%

1.21% >9

Enacting an apex body for coordinating public & private initiatives

Regional cooperation

Bangladesh dairy is economically potential, socially important, ecologically sensible and regionally receptive to collaboration and coordination

A Regional Dairy Platform for a) sharing success in and policy of the

regional dairies b) helping mobilization of public and

private investment c) initiating regional collaborative

programmes

Thanks to

Smallholder dairy farmers