Top Banner
Remote Sensing of Forest Genetic Diversity and Assessment of Below Ground Microbial Communities in Populus tremuloides Forests Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin Karen Mock – Utah State University Rick Lindroth – University of Wisconsin
35

Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

Remote Sensing of Forest Genetic Diversity and Assessment of Below Ground Microbial Communities in Populus tremuloides Forests . Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin Karen Mock – Utah State University Rick Lindroth – University of Wisconsin. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Remote Sensing of Forest Genetic Diversity and Assessment of Below Ground Microbial Communities in Populus tremuloides

Forests

Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University Phil Townsend –University of WisconsinKaren Mock – Utah State UniversityRick Lindroth – University of Wisconsin

Page 2: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

2

Genotype

Phenotype

Nutrient Cycles

Litter Chemistry

Environment

Page 3: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

3

Page 4: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 5: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Hyperspectral data

Page 6: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Objectives

1. Estimate the genetic diversity of aspen stands across multiple ecoregions using remotely sensed data.

2. Build predictive models of genetically-mediated leaf chemistry using remotely sensed hyperspectral data.

3. Measure belowground microbial biodiversity and functional diversity that results from genetically determined variation in plant chemistry.

6

Page 7: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 8: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

8

1. Genetic2. Nutrient/microbial3. Remotely-sensed

Page 9: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

1. Genetic – aspen phylogeography

• Hundreds of genotypes with multiple ramets– Midwest tend to be

small – West tend to be large– Polyploidy issues– Progress

• 2009 complete ~8 microsatellites

• 2010 nearing completion

Page 10: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Leaf• Carbon, nitrogen• Condensed tannins, lignin

• Soil• Nutrient: C, N, NH4

+, NO3-

• Microbial: extracellular enzymes, • t-RFLP

10

2. Leaf and Soil analyses

Page 11: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Hyperspectral data

Page 12: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

3. Remote sensing

• LANDSAT time series– Use fall phenology to identify aspen clones– Build time series databases normalized to end of

season dates• Mid-summer AVIRIS imagery

– Spectral variation to estimate clonal differences– Estimate canopy chemistry

Page 13: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

LANDSAT – end of season

USGS remote sensing phenology

Page 14: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 15: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 16: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 17: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 18: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 19: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 20: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

AVIRIS Pre-processing: Steps

Uncorrected image 1) Cloud, shadow, water mask

2) Cross-track correction

3) Remove redundant bands

4) Atmospheric correction 5) Terrain normalization

Aditya Singh

Page 21: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

AVIRIS spectral analysis

400 900 1400 1900 24000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

f090713t01p00r11rdn

T151T176T76T26T1

wavelength (nm)% r

eflec

tanc

e x

10,0

00

Page 22: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

400 900 1400 1900 24000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

AVIRIS 7-13-2009

T151T176T76T26

wavelength (nm)% r

eflec

tanc

e x

10,0

00 2.37%2.31%2.20%2.32%2.11%

Nitrogen Concentration

Page 23: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 24: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 25: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

400 900 1400 1900 24000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

f090713t01p00r11rdn

T151T176T76T26T1

wavelength (nm)

% r

eflec

tanc

e x

10,0

00

Page 26: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 27: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Hyperspectral data

Page 28: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Remote sensing summary

• LANDSAT – Promising, long data series needed, may work

better on larger clones• AVIRIS

– Expected relationships between canopy % N and reflectance persists within species

– MORE PROMISE than with LANDSAT• Visable spectra show no difference, spectra associated

with canopy chemistry shows differences among genotypes

Page 29: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Acknowledgements

• NASA• Clayton Kingdon• Peter Wolter• Timothy Whitby• Aditya Singh• Jacqui Bryant

Page 30: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

Preliminary analysis shows that bands known to correlate with N agree with canopy nitrogen measurements. Too few corrected AVIRIS images to present correlation.

Page 31: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Soil

N (%

)02468

1012141618

Soil

C (%

)

05

101520253035

Aspen genotype

NH4

-N u

g/ g

soil

• Aspen genotype influences– Belowground N– Belowground C– Belowground NH4

Page 32: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Aspen genotype

Leaf

N (%

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Tann

in (%

)• Aspen genotype influences– Canopy tannin– Canopy N

Page 33: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin

0

10

20

30

40

50

BG m

Mol

/hr

/gso

il05

1015202530354045

CB m

Mol

/hr

/gso

il

050

100150200250300350400

Aspen genotype

LA m

Mol

/hr

/gso

il

• Aspen genotype influences– Belowground

microbial community

Page 34: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin
Page 35: Mike Madritch - Appalachian State University  Phil Townsend –University of Wisconsin