8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
1/15
B T P M I D - T E R M P R E S E N TAT I O N
I N D I A N I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y, D E L H IC H E M I C A L E N G I N E E R I N G D E PA R M E N T
Calibration of dual-tip voidage probes formeasurement of gas hold-up, bubble size
and bubble rise velocity
Presented by:Nipun Agarwal2008CH10067
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
2/15
OBJECTIVE
Calibration of dual tip voidage probes by the use of high speed imaging for measurement of thefollowing parameters in dispersed gas-liquid flows:
Gas hold-upBubble size distributionBubble rise velocity
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
3/15
APPLICATION & IMPORTANCE
Air- lift reactor Gas-liquid stirred tank Slurry bubble column reactor
Industrial applications
Performance of the above reactors depends upon the gashold-up and bubble size distribution- Interfacial areameasurements
Interfacial area measurements are important to determinethe heat and mass transfer rates
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
4/15
APPLICATION AND IMPORTANCE
Interfacial area affects the extent of reaction as it directly relatesthe amount of gas and liquid in contact at a particular time
Measurement of hydrodynamic variables
Interfacial areameasurements
Heat and mass transferrates Extent of reaction
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
5/15
TECHNIQUES AVAILABLE
Two Broad categories of division between techniques
IntrusiveTechniques
VoidageProbes
OpticalProbes
Non IntrusiveTechniques
Tomography
ParticleImage
Velocimetry
Voidage probe(top), tomography (left),PIV (right)
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
6/15
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1. Buwa and Ranade, 2005 mentions the calibration of voidage probes by high speed imaging and digital image analysis
The study compares the average gas hold-up measured through both techniques
Calculates Phase Discrimination Threshold for the design by
comparing results by both processes Features Column dimensions: 50 cm (height), 5 cm (width), 2 cm (depth) Images recorded (about 100 images) in an interrogation window of
5cm by 5 cm were analyzed to calculate average bubble diameterand hence gas hold up by:
= 3
,6=1 Comparing the gas hold up values by conductivity experimentsand photography resulted in a PDT value of 10% which is beingused for processing data.
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
7/15
2. Zaruba et al., 2005 in their paper mention great detail on the study of bubble motion in a rectangular bubble column by means of high speedimaging
Bubble Identification Pictures recorded are scaled on a grey scale map varying from 0
(Pure black) to 255 (Pure white). Bubbles as shown in figure below come into the category of lower
grey scale
A brightness threshold ( ) is applied to clear the image fordetection of bubblesScale(image)> Scale (image)= 255 (white background)Scale(image)< Scale (image)= 0 (black foreground)
Actual image(left), Afterapplying threshold (right)
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
8/15
For calculating velocity of bubbles Centre of mass is assigned to each bubble- centroid of all pixels
that belong to the area (assuming every pixel has same weight)
Bubble path is traced by superimposing of successive frames Plotting the path of center of gravity of all bubbles (keeping some
threshold maximum value for successive frames)
3. Xue et al., 2007 presents a similar study of validation of four point
optical probe with high speed imaging for the gas hold-up, bubble size and bubble rise velocity distribution.
Uses XCAP software by EPIX to directly calculate the bubble rise velocity distribution with bubble sizes.
Compares the data by both methods for comparison
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
9/15
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
The setup consists of the following A rectangular column (Width=
5cm, Depth= 2cm and Height=50cm) made of (PMMA)
polymethylmethacrylate Spargers designed specially for
generating a uniform andpatterned flow of bubbles
High Speed imaging camera forphotographic measurements
Probes and signal conditioningsystem for acquiring data
Schematic of the set-up
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
10/15
KEY HIGHLIGHTS OF THE DESIGN
Rectangular column specially design of theminimum possible thickness
Ensures generation of a 2-D array of bubblesimportant for photographic measurements
Ensures that the bubbles do not overlap
Small spargers designed specifically for the setupto ensure uniform bubble and inline bubbleproduction
An interrogation window of 5 cm x 5 cm forphotographic measurements
Experimental setup
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
11/15
WHY THE NEED OF STUDY?
When a bubble hits a probe tip, the interaction between the tip and the bubble dents the leading edge of the bubble
This can happen because of following
Properties of liquid: Surface tension, polarity, density
Properties of probe: Material, shape
Therefore to account for the irregularities that may arise in the
measurement due to distortion of bubbles on hitting the probe we needto calibrate the method and validate the measurements obtained by theprobes with that of high speed imaging
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
12/15
Image Processing Steps
1. Video is broken into images.
2. Appropriate test screen is cut out
3. Photograph is converted to binary
4. Set threshold to distinguish bubblesin the image.
5. Clear the picture of disturbances
6. Analyze the image using ImageJ
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
13/15
METHODOLGY
There has been validation studies validating the gas hold-up by highspeed imaging but not much has been reported in terms of validationof bubble size and rise velocity measurements
Simultaneous data acquisition by both the voidage probes and by themeans of high speed imaging
Comparing the data of gas hold-up, bubble size and rise velocity distribution generated by both the process
Validating the results and making appropriate changes in theprocessing methodology or probe design as per the requirements
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
14/15
PRESENT WORK
The column of the required dimension has been acquired Spargers with needle sizes 18, 21 and 23 gauge has been constructed
for experimentation with different bubble sizes
Performed a preliminary experiment recording a test video by a highspeed imaging camera
FUTURE WORK Simultaneous experiments for both the methods and validating the
results with each other
Introducing any changes in the probe configuration or processingmethodology if required for validation
8/2/2019 Mid Sem Ppt_nipun
15/15
THANK YOU