INTRODUCTION 1.1 Biotechnology The term biotechnology represents a fusion or an alliance between biology and technology. Biotechnology is as old as human civilization and is an integral part of human life. There are records that wine and beer were prepared in as early as 600 B.C. bread and curd in 4000 B.C. The term biotechnology was introduced in 1917 by Hungarian engineer, Karl Ereky. It concerns with the exploitation of biological agents or their components for generating useful products / services. The area covered under biotechnology is very vast and the techniques involved are highly divergent. 1.1.1 Definition of Biotechnology : Biotechnology consists of ‘the controlled use of biological agents, such as, micro-organisms or cellular components, for beneficial use”. U.S. National Science Foundation Biotechnology is “the integrated use of biochemistry, microbiology and engineering sciences in order to achieve technological application of the capabilities of micro organisms, cultured tissues / cells and parts thereof”. European Federation of Biotechnology (1981) 1
141
Embed
“Micropropagation Studies On Bambusa Tulda, Dendrocalamus Longipathus And Chemoprofiling Of Rauwolfea Serpentine”
The term biotechnology represents a fusion or an alliance between biology and technology. Biotechnology is as old as human civilization and is an integral part of human life. There are records that wine and beer were prepared in as early as 600 B.C. bread and curd in 4000 B.C. The term biotechnology was introduced in 1917 by Hungarian engineer, Karl Ereky.
It concerns with the exploitation of biological agents or their components for generating useful products / services. The area covered under biotechnology is very vast and the techniques involved are highly divergent.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Biotechnology
The term biotechnology represents a fusion or an alliance between
biology and technology. Biotechnology is as old as human civilization and is
an integral part of human life. There are records that wine and beer were
prepared in as early as 600 B.C. bread and curd in 4000 B.C. The term
biotechnology was introduced in 1917 by Hungarian engineer, Karl Ereky.
It concerns with the exploitation of biological agents or their
components for generating useful products / services. The area covered
under biotechnology is very vast and the techniques involved are highly
divergent.
1.1.1 Definition of Biotechnology :
Biotechnology consists of ‘the controlled use of biological agents, such
as, micro-organisms or cellular components, for beneficial use”.
U.S. National Science Foundation
Biotechnology is “the integrated use of biochemistry, microbiology and
engineering sciences in order to achieve technological application of the
capabilities of micro organisms, cultured tissues / cells and parts thereof”.
European Federation of Biotechnology (1981)
Biotechnology comprises the “controlled and deliberate application of
simple biological agents – living or dead, cells or cell components – in
technically useful operations, either of productive manufacture or as
service operation”.
J.D. Bu’lock (1987)
The application of biological organisms, systems or process
constitutes biotechnology.
British Biotechnologist
Biotechnology is “the use of living organisms in system or processes
for the manufacture of useful products, it may involve algae, bacteria,
1
fungi, yeast, cells of higher plants and animals or sub systems of any of
these or isolated components from living matter”.
Gibbs and Greenhalgh (1983)
Biotechnology is the application of scientific and engineering principles
to the processing of materials by biological agents to provide goods and
services”.
Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (1981)
Biotechnology is the application of biochemistry, biology, microbiology
and chemical engineering to industrial process and products and on
environment.
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1981)
1.1.2 Major Fields of Biotechnology :
1.1.3 Importance of Biotechnology :
Biotechnology has rapidly emerged as an area of activity having a
worked realized as well as potential impact on virtually all domains of human
welfare ranging from food processing, protecting the environment, to human
health. It how plays a very important role in employment, production and
2
Human healthMedicines Animal health
Animal husbandry
Fisheries & aquaculture
Mining
Population control
Renewable energy and fruits
Environment
Horticulture & floriculture
Forestry Plant Biotechnology
Agriculture
Crimes & percentage
Food processing & beverages
Chemicals & biochemicals
Dairy
BIOTECHNOLOGY
productivity, trade, economics and economy, human health and the quality of
human life throughout the world.
The importance of biotechnology to human welfare as for the protection
of human health, production of monoclonal antibodies, DNA & RNA probes
(for disease diagnosis), artificial vaccines (for inoculation), rare and highly
valuable drugs, such as human interferon, insulin etc. (for disease treatment)
and the technology for gene therapy (for treatment of genetic diseases) are
some of the notable achievements.
Micro-organisms are being employed since several decades for the
large scale production of a variety of biochemical’s ranging from alcohol to
antibiotics in processing of foods and feeds. Enzymes, isolated mainly from
microorganisms and immobilized in suitable polymers (called matrices) are
preferred over the whole organisms for a variety of reasons; they are
becoming increasing popular in many commercial ventures.
Several biological agents, such as, viruses, fungi, amoebae etc. are
being exploited for the control of plant diseases and insect pests. Bacteria are
being utilized for detoxification of industrial effluent (wastes), for treatment of
sewage and for biogas production.
Invitro fertilization and embryo transfer techniques have permitted
childless couples, suffering from one or the there kind of sterility, to have their
own babies (test tube babies).
Genetic engineering is being employed to develop transgenic animals /
plants resistant to certain diseases.
In agriculture, rapid and economic clonal multiplication of fruit and
forest trees, production of virus free stocks of clonal crops through genetic
engineering have opened up exciting possibilities in crop production,
protection and improvement.
1.2 Plant Biotechnology
3
Plant Biotechnology in the implication of biotechnological tools for
improving the genotype, phynotypic tool for improving the genotype,
phenotype, performance, multiplication rate of plant or exploiting cell
constituent, generating useful products.
Plant biotechnology may be defined as generations of useful products
or services from plant cells, tissue & organs. Such cells, tissues and organs
are either continuously maintained invitro or they pass through a variable.
In vitro phase to enable generation from them of complete plantlets
which is ultimately transferred to field therefore plant tissue culture technique
form an integral part of plant biotech activities.
1.2.1 Objectives : The various objectives achievable / achieved by plant
biotechnology may be summarized as under :
1. Rapid clonal multiplication (adventitious shoots / bulb/protocorm or SE
regeneration, axillary bud proliferation).
2. Germplasm conservation of vegetatively reproducing plants or those
pH – pH was adjusted to 5.7 to 5.8 with 1N HCl & 1N NaOH.
Solidifying agent – Solid growth medium prepared by supplementing
0.8% agar.
Table 3.1 Composition of MS medium (Murashige & Skoog 1962) :
S.No. Compound Amount (mg/l)1. NH4NO3 1650
2. KNO3 1900
3. MgSO4.7H2O 370
4. CaCl2.2H2O 440
5. KH2PO4 170
67
6. KI 0.83
7. H3BO3 6.2
8. MnSO4.4H2O 22.3
9. ZnSO4.7H2O 8.6
10. NaMoO4.2H2O 0.25
11. CuSO4.5H2O 0.025
12. CoCl2.6H2O 0.025
13. FeSO4.7H2O 27.8
14. Na2EDTA.2H2O 37.3
15. Inosited 100
16. Nicotinic acid 0.5
17. Pyridoxine HCl 0.5
18. Thiamine HCl 0.1
19. Glycine 2
PGR As per need
Sucrose 30% (30 mg/l)
Ph 5.7 – 5.8 (using 1 HCl or 1N NaOH)
Agar 0.8% (8 mg/l)
Table 3.2 Stock solutions :
Compound Amount mg/lA. Stock I (20x) – Macronutrients
NH4NO3 33000
KNO3 38000
CaCl2.H2O 8800
MgSO4 7400
KH2PO4 3400
B. Stock II (200 x) – Micronutrients
KI 166
H3BO3 1240
MnSO4.4H2O 4460
ZnSO4.7H2O 1720
68
NaMoO4.7H2O 50
CuSO4.5H2O 5
CoCl2.6H2O 5
C. Stock III (200 x) – Iron
FeSO4.7H2O 5560
Na2EDTA.2H2O 7460
D. Stock IV (200 x) – Vitamin
Inositol 22000
Nicotinic acid 100
Pyridoxine HCl 100
Thiamine HCl 20
Glycine 400
For the preparation of stock solutions, each component should be
separately dissolved to the last particle and then mixed with the others.
All components were dissolved separately in some amount of double
distilled water, mixed with each other and final volume is made up.
Stock solutions were stored in refrigerator and iron stock stored in a
amber coloured bottle (to prevent photoxidation).
Volume of stock solution
Volume of Media2000 ml 1000 ml 500 ml
Stock I 100 ml. 50 ml. 25 ml.
Stock II 10 ml. 5 ml. 2.5 ml.
Stock III 10 ml. 5 ml. 2.5 ml.
Stock IV 10 ml. 5 ml. 2.5 ml.
Procedure for preparation of 1 litre media
69
Take 500 ml. DDW in a flask
Add 50 ml of stock I
Add 5 ml. of stock II
3.2 Explant
Tissue culture is started from pieces of whole plants. The small organs
or pieces of tissue that are used are called explants.
The part of the plant from which explants are obtained, depends on :
o The type of culture to be initiated
o The purpose of the proposed culture
o The plant species to be used
Collection time of explant
The time of explant affects the success of plant tissue culture. The
explant is favoured for tissue culture as it is less susceptible contamination as
compared to large sized explants.
3.3 Preparation of explant - A
70
Add 5 ml. of stock III
Add 5 ml. of stock IV
Add 30 gm. sucrose and dissolve it
Add required amount of auxin and cytokinin. Auxin dissolved in alcohol & cytokinin dissolved in 1N NaOH
Make up the volume upto 1000 ml. with DDW
Maintain the pH value it should be 5.7 with 1N HCl & 1N NaOH
Add 8gm. agar in the medium, melt it in microwave oven
Pouring of media into test tubes & bottles and autoclaved for 30 min.
Explant collection - Explant was collected from Bamborium /
Bambusetum of SFRI, Jabalpur.
Criteria for clump selection : Clump should be phenotypically
superior
Clump should be healthy and
disease free.
Number of culms should be more.
Culm shows maximum branching.
Criteria for explant selection (collected from mature culms)
Nodal part having unsprouted bud was taken as explant.
Nodal part should be free from dust & contamination.
The size of explant would be ranging from few mm to few
inches.
Treatment of explant prior to inoculation
71
Explant (thin culms with nodes)
Washing with 5% extran / for 30-45 min.
Rinsing with distilled water 4-5 times
Washing with 2% Bavistin (antifungal agent) for 30-45 min.
Rinsing with distilled water 4-5 times
Treatment of explant during inoculation (under aseptic condition)
o Explant was UV sterilized for 45 min in laminar air flow cabinet.
o Washing of explant was performed 3-4 times with sterilized
double distilled water.
o Explant was treated with 0.1% HgCl2 for 8-12 min. for surface
sterilization and again washed with sterilized double distilled
water (3-4 times).
Inoculation
o Fresh culturing : The treated explant was
inoculated in sterilized medium test tubes and sealed with cellophan
tape and inoculation date and accession number was marked. This
procedure was performed under aseptic condition in Laminar Air Flow
cabinet.
o Subculturing : The in-vitro grown shoots explants
were cut above (transverse cutting) and below (slant cutting) nodal
region and transferred in sterilized medium (in bottles) for further
growth.
o Maintenance of culture : Inoculated culture
vessels were transferred to the culture rocks for growth (at 16 hrs. of
photoperiod and 8 hours dark at 25 + 2oC temperature).
72
Trimming of explant (above & below nodal region)
Removal of nodal ring
Wipping of explant with 80% alcohol
Keeping of explant in bottle containing distilled water and covering with muslin cloth
o Observation :
Cultures were timely observed for growth
and contamination.
Contaminated cultures were immediately
removed.
3.4 Preparation of explant : B
Explant collection : Explant was collected from bamborium /
bambusetum of SFRI ,Jabalpur. The plant was tissue cultured , which was
recently flowered in Dec 08- Jan 09.
Criteria for seed selection :
Seed should be healthy and disease free.
Treatment of explant prior to inoculation
Treatment of explant during inoculation (under aseptic condition)
o Explant was UV – sterilized for 45 min in Laminar Air Flow
cabinet.
o Washing of explant (seeds) was performed 3-4 times with
sterilized double distilled water.
o Explant was treated with 0.1% HgCl2 for 5-10 min for surface
sterilization and again washed with sterilized double distilled water (3-4
times).
Inoculation
73
Explant (seeds)
Washing with 5% extran for 10-20 min.
Rinsing with distilled water 4-5 times
Washing with 2% bavistin (antifungal agent) for 10-20 min.
Rinsing with distilled water 4-5 times
Keeping of explant (seeds) in bottle containing distilled water and covering with muslin cloth
o Fresh culturing : The treated explant was
inoculated in sterilized medium test tubes and sealed with cellophan
tap and inoculation date & accession number was marked. This
procedure was performed under aseptic condition in Laminar Air
Flow cabinet.
o Sub culturing : Seeds were removed from in-vitro
grown plants and transferred in sterilized medium (in bottles) for
further growth.
Maintenance of culture : Inoculated
culture vessels were transferred to the culture racks for growth (at 16-
18 hrs. of photoperiod and 6-8 hrs. dark at 25 + 2oC temperature).
Observation :
o Cultures were timely observed for
growth and contamination.
o Contaminated culture was
immediately removed
3.5 PREPARATION OF SAMPLE FOR HPLC :-
Procedure : Soxhlet process
o Collect the material and wash them.
o Keep for 15-25 days for drying.
o Take 2 gm. of dried powdered material.
o Perform solubility test.
o Refluxing in soxhlet apparatus for 8 hrs.
o Sample should be concentrated and recovery of solvent by rotary
vapor.
o Then undergo for purification.
Dipping process :
o Take the 2 gm. of sample.
o Dipped into 150 ml. of acetonitrile (solvent).
74
o Kept in conical flask into water bath for 8 hrs.
o Filter the sample by Whatt’s man filter paper.
o Heat (again left for 8 hrs.).
o Load the collected sample in rotary vapor.
o Solvent was extracted out.
o Then undergo for purification.
Purification process :
1. Collect the concentrated sample and treat with equal amount of
hexane times.
2. Use pellet as a sample and add equal amount of 3% HCl mix
properly and filter it.
3. Take supernatant as a sample and adjust the pH 7-7.2 with the
help of 10% NH3.
4. Filter it and treat with chloroform (3 times).
5. Take the supernatant as a sample and add 1 gm. of sodium
sulphate and dissolve it.
6. Test with dragondroff’s reagent for alkaloid sample is filtered
through Millipore suction filter.
7. Take 5 ml solution for injection into HPLC.
8. Sample injected into HPLC system through injector and loaded
peak is obtained after retention time.
Precautions :
1. Flushing
To cleanup column flushing is required for this run the solvent for at
least half an hour, when switch on the unit and half an hour before switch off
the unit.
75
RESULTS , DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
OBSERVATIONS – Species (Explant) A
Table – 1 – NO PGR
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGrowth
initiationTotal No. of
sprouted test tubes
After7 days(cm)
After 14 days(cm)
After 21 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Bambusa tulda, nodal region
13.03.09 15Sprouting
after 3 days
11
No. of shoots 2-5 3-8 5-8
A – 45 min.B – 45 min. C – 8 min.
1. Fungal contamination was observed after 2 weeks in 4 test tubes.
2. Growth was good.
Length of shoots .1-.8 .4-1.8 .5 -2.6
Root formation - - -
16.03.09 15Sprouting
after 3 days
13
No. of shoots
3-4 5-8 5-8
A – 40 min.B – 40 min.C – 9 min.
1. Fungal contamination was observed after 2 weeks in one test tube.
2. Growth was good.
Length of shoots .1-.8 .1-1.5 .2-2.9
Root formation
- - -
77
Table – 2 – IAA . 5:1 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGrowth
initiationTotal No. of
sprouted test tubes
After 7days(cm)
After 14 days(cm)
After 21 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Bambusa tulda, nodal region
25.03.09 10Sprouting
after 3 days
7
No. of shoots 2-6 3-7 5-8
A – 20 min.B – 20 min.C – 6 min.
3. Fungal contamination observed after 1 week in 1 test tube.
4. Growth was slow after 14 days.
Length of shoots
0.3-1.7
1-2.1 3-2.3
Root formation - - -
25.04.09 10Sprouting
after 5 days
4
No. of shoots
1 1 2
A – 30 min.B – 30 min.C – 10 min.D – 30 min.
3. Fungal contamination not observed.
4. Growth was very slow.
Length of shoots 0.4 0.7
0.5-1.7
Root formation
- - -
78
Table – 3 – IAA . 5:1.5 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGrowth
initiationTotal No. of
sprouted test tubes
After 7days(cm)
After 14 days(cm)
After 21 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Bambusa tulda, nodal region
26.03.09 10Sprouting
after 4 days
7
No. of shoots 2-5 4-7 5-9
A – 20 min.B – 30 min.C – 10 min.D – 20 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Growth was average.
Length of shoots 0.2-1.8 0.2-2.2 2-3.2
Root formation - - -
09.04.09 24Sprouting after 4-8
days8
No. of shoots
1-3 2-3 3-5
A – 20 min.B – 20 min.C – 9 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Growth was very slow.
Length of shoots 0.2-1 0.3-1.9 0.5-2
Root formation
- - -
79
Table – 4– IAA . 5 : 2 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGrowth
initiationTotal No. of
sprouted test tubes
After 7days(cm)
After 14 days(cm)
After 21 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Bambusa tulda, nodal region
25.03.09 20Sprouting
after 2 days
19
No. of shoots 5-7 5-9 7-14
A – 20 min.B – 30 min.C – 10 min.D – 20 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Growth was very fast.
Length of shoots 0.2-1.8 0.3-2.7 2-5.2
Root formation - - -
05.04.09 20No.
Sprouting 0
No. of shoots
- - -
A – 30 min.B – 30 min.C – 10 min.D – 30 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Sprouting was not observed between 7-21 days.
Length of shoots - - -
Root formation
- - -
80
Table – 5 – IAA . 5 : 2.5 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGrowth
initiationTotal No. of
sprouted test tubes
After 7days(cm)
After 14 days(cm)
After 21 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Bambusa tulda, nodal region
26.03.09 20Sprouting
after 3 days
14
No. of shoots 2-4 3-6 3-7
A – 20 min.
B – 30 min.
C – 10 min.
D – 20 min.
1. Fungal contamination observed after 7 days in 1 test tube.
2. Growth was slow.
Length of shoots 0.2-1.5 0.4-1.8 1.3-2.1
Root formation - - -
21.04.09 20No.
Sprouting 0
No. of shoots
- - -
A – 30 min.
B – 30 min.
C – 10 min.
D – 30 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Sprouting was not observed between 7-21 days.
Length of shoots - - -
Root formation
- - -
81
Table – 6 – IAA . 5 : 3 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGrowth
initiationTotal No. of
sprouted test tubes
After 7days(cm)
After 14 days(cm)
After 21 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Bambusa tulda, nodal region
23.03.09 20Sprouting
after 3 days
16
No. of shoots 1-4 2-7 4-6
A – 40 min.
B – 40 min.
C – 09 min.
1. Fungal contamination observed after 1 week in 1 test tube.
2. Growth was slow after 14 days.
Length of shoots 0.2-1.8 0.3-2.1 0.7-3.8
Root formation - - -
07.04.09 20Sprouting
after 4 days
13
No. of shoots
1-3 2-4 2-4
A – 40 min.
B – 40 min.
C – 10 min.
D – 30 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Growth was very slow.
Length of shoots 0.2-0.7 0.4-1.8 0.3-2
Root formation
- - -
82
Table – 7 – IAA . 5 : 4 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGrowth
initiationTotal No. of
sprouted test tubes
After 7days(cm)
After 14 days(cm)
After 21 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Bambusa tulda, nodal region
16.03.09 20Sprouting
after 3 days
11
No. of shoots 2-4 3-5 4-9 A – 20 min.
B – 20 min.
C – 10 min.
D – 30 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Growth was average.
Length of shoots 0.3-1 0.5-1.8 1.5-3
Root formation - - -
20.03.09 20Sprouting
after 3 days
13
No. of shoots
1-2 1-3 2-3
A – 30 min.
B – 30 min.
C – 10 min.
D – 30 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Growth was very slow.
Length of shoots 0.2-0.7 0.3-1.2 0.4-2.2
Root formation
- - -
83
OBSERVATIONS – Species (Explant) - B
Table – 1 – IAA . 5 : 1 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After10days(cm)
After 20 days(cm)
After 30 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
Seed30.03.09 10
After 2 days
10 with variation in shoot growth
No. of shoots
1MS 2-4
1MS-3-5
1MS-5-7
A – 20 min.
B – 20 min.
C – 04 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Multiple shoots formation in 2 test tubes with slow growth and root formation not found.
Length ofShoots 0.7-1.3
MS .2-.84-8.1
MS 2-47.5-12MS 1-6
Length of Root
5-4.8More than 5
cm
More than 5
cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
84
Table – 2 – IAA . 5 : 1 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After10days(cm)
After 20 days(cm)
After30days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
30.03.09 10After 2 days
3 with variation in shoot growth
No. of shoots
1
MS 3
1
MS 5
1
MS 6 A – 10 min.
B – 20 min.
C – 05 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Multiple shoot formation in 1 test tube with slow growth and root formation not found.
Length ofshoots
1.6-3
MS .3-.4
5.3-5.9
MS .3-1.2
7-8.9
MS.6-1.8
Length of Root 2.5
More than 5
cm
More than 5
cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
85
Table – 3 – IAA . 5 : 2 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After 10 days(cm)
After 20 days(cm)
After30days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
30.03.09 10After 2 days
6 with variation in shoot growth
No. of shoots
1
MS 8-16
1
MS13-39
1
MS15-60(about)
A – 10 min.
B – 20 min.
C – 05 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Multiple shoot formation in 4 test tubes with slow growth and root formation not found.
Length of
shoots
.6-.8
MS .3-.8
2.2-3.8
MS .5-1
5.6-6.3
MS 1.2-2.6
Length of Root
2.5-5 More than 5 cm
More than 5 cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
86
Table – 4 – IAA . 5 : 2.5 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After10 days(cm)
After20 days(cm)
After 30 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
30.03.09 10After 2 days
5 with variation
in growth
No. of shoots 1 1 1
A – 10 min.
B – 20 min.
C – 05 min.
1. Fungal contamination observed in 1 test tube after 20 days.
2. Multiple shoot not found.
3. Germination found in 5 test tubes but proper growth was found in only 1 test tube .
Length ofshoots
1.2 4 6.8
Length of Root
3More than 5
cm
More than 5
cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
87
Table – 5 – IAA . 5 : 3 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After10 days(cm)
After 20 days(cm)
After 30 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
02.04.09 10After 2 days
7 with variation
in growth
No. of shoots
1
MS 2
1
MS 3
1
MS 4 A – 20 min.
B – 30 min.
C – 05 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Multiple shoot formation in only 1 test tube with slow growth and root formation not found.
Length ofshoots
0.7-1.2
MS .2-.4
2.7-7.8
MS.3-.7
3.5-15
MS.3-1
Length of Root
0.8-.16 2.7-4More than 5
cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
88
Table – 6 – IAA . 5 : 4 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After10 days(cm)
After20days(cm)
After 30 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
06.04.09 42After 3 days
8 with variation
in growth
No. of shoots
1
MS 2-11
1
MS 3-20
1
MS 4-40 (about)
A – 20 min.
B – 30 min.
C – 04 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Multiple shoot formation in 3 test tubes with slow growth and root formation not found.
Length ofshoots
.8-2.8
MS .2-.6
4.5-13
MS .5-2.8
5.7-16.9
MS .8-4
Length of Root
0.2-1 1-5More than 5
cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
89
Table – 7 – IAA . 2 : .5 BAP
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After10days(cm)
After 20 days(cm)
After 30 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
02.04.09 30After 2 days
28 with variation in shoot growth
No. of shoots
1
MS 2-3
1
MS 3
1
MS 4-5 A – 20 min.
B – 30 min.
C – 05 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Multiple shoot formation in 3 test tube with slow growth and root formation not found.
Length ofshoots
1-6.5
MS .2-.6
5-12.2
MS.5-2.8
9-17.2
MS .8-4
Length of Root
0.2-4More than 5
cm
More than 5
cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
90
Table – 8 – IAA . 5 : 1 Kinetin
Species & explant Date of inoculation
Total no. of inoculated test tubes
ObservationsGermination Total No. of
germination test tubes
After10days(cm)
After20days(cm)
After 30 days(cm)
Treatments Remarks
Dendrocalamus longispathus
02.04.09 22After 2 days
16
No. of shoots 1 1 1 A – 20 min.
B – 30 min.
C – 05 min.
1. Fungal contamination not observed.
2. Multiple shoot not found.
Length ofshoots
1.5-6.5 3.3-13.2 4.8-17.5
Length of Root
0.4-3More than 5
cm
More than 5
cm
MS – Multiple Shoot
91
RESULTS
Species - A
The effects of different PGR combination on the in vitro growth pattern
of Bambusa tulda are as follows :
Induction of Multiple Shoots : (In fresh culturing)
Table 1 : NO PGR - The better shoot proliferation was observed.
Table 2 : IAA 0.5:1 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good in first trial but
very poor in second trial.
Table3:IAA 0.5 :1.5 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good in first but
average in second trial.
Table 4: IAA 0.5 : 2 BAP - The shoot proliferation was extensive in first trial
but no sprouting in second trial.
Table 5: IAA 0.5 : 2.5 BAP- The shoot proliferation was moderate in first
trial but no sprouting in second trial.
Table 6: IAA : 0.5 : 3 BAP - The shoot proliferation was average in first
trial and poor in second trial.
Table 7 IAA 0.5 : 4 BAP – The shoot proliferation was good in first trial but
poor in second trial.
Increase in Shoot Length :
Table 1 : NO PGR - The shoot growth was good.
Table 2 : IAA 0.5 :1 BAP - Shoot length was less (2.3 cm) in first trial and
very less (1.7 cm) in second trial.
Table 3:IAA 0.5:1.5 BAP - Shoot length was moderate (3.2 cm) in first trial &
less (2 cm) in second trial also.
Table 4:IAA 0.5:2 BAP - Shoot length was maximum (5.2 cm) in first trial.
Table 5:IAA 0.5:2.5 BAP - Shoot length was less (2.1 cm) in first trial.
Table 6:IAA 0.5:3 BAP - Shoot length was average (3.8 cm) in first trial &
less in (2 cm) second trial.
Table 7: IAA 0.5:4 BAP - Shoot length was good (4 cm) in first trial & very
poor (2.2 cm) in second trial.
92
Sub Culturing :
During sub culturing of sprouted explant in all the combinations were
dried within 2-7 days.
Species – B
Induction of Shoots :
Table 1: IAA 0.5:1 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good but with
less germination percentage i.e. 40%.
Table 2 : IAA 0.5 : 1.5 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good but with
less germination percentage i.e. 30%.
Table 3 : IAA 0.5:2 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good but with
less germination percentage i.e., 60%.
Table 4 : IAA 0.5 : 2.5 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good but with
less germination percentage i.e., 50%.
Table 5 : IAA 0.5 : 3 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good but with
less germination percentage i.e., 70%.
Table 6 : IAA 0.5: 4 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good but with
less germination percentage i.e., 14%.
Table 7 : IAA 0.2 : 0.5 BAP - The shoot proliferation was good with good
germination percentage i.e., 93%.
Table 8 : IAA 0.5 : 1 Kinetin - The shoot proliferation was good with good
germination percentage i.e., 72%.
In above all combinations the induction of root was also found with
shoot induction in single shoots only.
Increase in Shoot Length :
Table 1 : IAA 0.5 : 1 BAP - Increase in length was more in single shoot
(maximum 12 cm) and less in multiple shoot
(max. 5 cm).
Table 2 : IAA 0.5 : 1.5 BAP - Increase in length was more in single shoot
(max. 8.9 cm) and less in multiple shoot
(max. 1.8 cm).
93
Table 3 : IAA 0.5 : 2 BAP - Increase in length was more in single shoot
(max. 6.3 cm) and less in multiple shoot
(max. 2.6 cm).
Table 4 : IAA 0.5 : 2.5 BAP - Increase in length was more in single shoot
(max. 6.8 cm), multiple shoot not found.
Table 5 : IAA 0.5 : 3 BAP - Increase in length was more in single shoot
(max. 15 cm) and less in multiple shoot
(max. 1 cm).
Table 6 : IAA 0.5 : 4 BAP - Increase in length was more in single shoot
(max. 16.9 cm) and less in multiple shoot
(max. 4 cm).
Table 7 : IAA 0.2 : 0.5 BAP - Increase in length was more in single shoot
(max. 17.2 cm) and less in multiple shoot
(max. 3.2 cm).
Table 8 : IAA 0.5 : 1 Kinetin - Increase in length was in single shoot (max.
17.5 cm), multiple shoot not found.
Note : Growth of root length was found better in all PGR combinations.
94
DISCUSSION
Species – A
In all the combinations during second trial growth of shoot was not as
good as during first trial, it might be due to resting period of Bambusa tulda.
The shoot proliferation and length was extensive in IAA 0.5 : 2 BAP
(Table-4) combination. But in all other combinations the shoot proliferation
was moderate but growth of shoot length was as good as it should be.
In higher combination IAA 0.5 : 4 BAP (Table 7) proper sprouting was
obtained with less percentage.
Species – B
Among all the combinations IAA 0.2 : 0.5 BAP (Table 7) combination
was better for germination and shoot proliferation it is also better for increase
in length of single shoot and multiple shoot.
The combination IAA 0.5 : 4 BAP (Table 6) was also found better in
terms of shoot proliferation, increase in length of single and multiple shoot but
percentage of germination was very less.
There was emergence and better development of root in single shoots
for all the combinations but it was absent in case of multiple shoot.
CONCLUSIONS
Bamboo is a woody perennial evergreen grass having considerable
economic, social and ecological importance. It is an important raw material for
pulp and paper industry. Due to higher demand than that of production of
bamboo there is need to develop proper micropropagation technique to meet
out the existing demand.
Species Bambusa tulda is important for pulp - paper and rayon
industry.
95
Species Dendrocalamus longisphathus is important in terms of higher
edible portion (about 40%), manufacturing of good quality tooth picks and also
elegant to grow in the gardens.
During micropropagation of Bambusa tulda IAA 0.5 : 2 BAP (Table 4)
combination of PGR was found better, for fresh culturing but there is problem
of drying of sprouting explant during subculturing that is why the protocol for
the species is yet not developed.
During micropropagation of Dendrocalamus longispathus IAA 0.2 : 0.5
(Table 7) combination of PGR was found better for fresh culturing and sub
culturing was also found successful.
96
Sample chromatogram of an alkaloid :
RT(min) Peak name Area(mV*sec) 5.298 sample 368.611
Standard chromatogram of reserpine :
RT(min) Peak name Area(mV*sec) 4.643 std 841.338
Peak area of the sample/ l injection sample wt. of std. (gm/ml) X X 100% Conc. = wt. of sample Peak area of the standard/ l injection standard (gm/ml)
97
= 368.611/5 x .001 x100
841.338/5 .013
= 3.32%
Conclusion
By comparing graph of sample and standard after injection it is
concluded that the sample is reserpine (alkaloid), which is of 3.32%
concentration.
98
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adaresh Kumar, 1991, “Mass production of field planting stock of Dendrocolamus strictus through macroproliferation – a technology”. Indian Forester 117, 1046-4052.
Alexander, M.P., Rao, T.C., 1968, “In vitro culture of bamboo embryo”. Current Science 37, 415.
Banik, R.L., 1994, “Review of conventional propagation research in bamboos and future strategy”. Constraints to the production of bamboo and rattan. INBAR Technical Report No5 (Delhi), 115-142.
Banik, R.L., 1995, “Selection criteria and population enhancement of priority bamboos”. In : J.T. Williams, I.V. Ramanuja Rao, A.N. Rao (Eds.).
Bennet, S.S.R. and Gaur, R.O., Thirty seven Bamboos Growing in India.
Chawla H.S., Introduction to Plant Biotechnology.
Dwivedi, A.P., Salborer Calamity, a case of M.P. and CH, Sai Publication Bhopal, 2005 P. 7.
George E.F. and Sherington P.D. Plant Propogation by Tissue Culture.
Glelis, J., 1995, “Bamboo and biotechnology”. European Bamboo Society Journal, May 6, 27-39.
http:// plants.usda.gov.
ICFRE 1998. Timber/Bamboo Trade Bulletin. March, 1998, No. 14. Directorate of Statistics, ICFRE, Dehra Dun. 21 pp.
INBAR, 1991, Rao, I.V. Ramanuja, Yusof, A.M., Rao, A.N., Sastry, C.B. “Propagation of bamboo and rattan through tissue culture”, INBAR (Delhi. IDRC, 1991), 60 pp.
Induction of Wond vessel differentiation in isolated coleus stem segments invitro, dept. of biological sciences University of Idano, Moscow. American Journal of Bot. 51(1) : 19-25 – 1955.
John H. Dodds and Lorin W. Roberts experiments in Plant Tissue Culture.
Kumar U., Methods in Plant Tissue Culture.
Manzur, D., 1988, “Propagacion vegetative de Guadua angustifolia Kunth”. Agronomia 2(3), 14-19.
Mishra, Y., Patel Pradeep, Kumar, Yadav, S., Shirin F. and Ansari S.A. 2008. “Scientia Horticuture volume 115, Issue 3, 1 Feb. 2008, pp. 315-318.
99
Movel G. 1960. Producing virus free cymbidiums. Americn orchid society bulletin, 15, 495-497.
Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for napid growth and Bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiology Plantarum, 15, 473-497.
Nadgauda, R.S., John, C.K., Joshi, M.S., Parasharami, V.A., Mascarenhas, A.F., 1997, “Application of in vitro techniques for bamboo improvement”. In : Chapman, G. (Ed.) The Bamboos (Academic Press), 163-177.
Nadgir, A.L., Phadke, C.H., Gupta, P.K., Parsharam, V.A., Nair, S., Mascarenhas, A., 1984, “Rapid multiplication of bamboo by tissue culture”. Silvae Genet. 33, 219-223.
Organogenesis leading to adventitious shoots and plants excised from shoot spices”. Environmental and Experimental Botany 29 (3), 307-315.
Prutpongse, P., Gavinlertvatana, P., 1992, “In vitro micropropagation of 54 species from 15 genera of bamboobs’. Hort Science 27, 453-454.
Saxena, S., Bhojwani, S.S., 1993, “In vitro clonal multiplication of 4 year old plants of the bamboo Dendrocalamus longispathus Kurz”. In vitro Cellular and Development Biology 29P, 135-142.
Saxena, S., Dhawan, V., 1994, “Micropropagation research in south Asia”. Constraints to production of bamboo and rattan. INBAR Technical Report 5 (Delhi), 101-113.
Singhal, R.M. and Gangopadhyay, P.B. 1999. Bamboo and its Database in India. ICFRE Publications (in perss).
Skoog, F. and Miller, C.O. 1957. Chemcial Regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissue culture invitro. Symposium of the society of experimental biology 11 : 118-140.
Subramanlam, K.N., 1994, “Bamboos – Demand and supply of planting stock”. INBAR Newsletter No5, 24-25.
Taylor, A. Steenes and Lar, M. Susser Patterns in Plant Development.
Tewari, D.N. 1992. A Monograph on bamboo. pp. 1-498. International Book Distributurs, Dehra Dun.
www.molecular - plant biotechnology. info
Zamora, A.B., 1994, “Review of micropropagation research on bamboos”. Constraints to production of bamboo and rattan. IN BAR Technical Report 5 (Delhi), 45-100.