Top Banner
Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof Phil Coates, Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof Phil Coates, IRC in Polymer Engineering, IRC in Polymer Engineering, Dept. Mechanical & Medical Engineering, Dept. Mechanical & Medical Engineering, University of Bradford, Bradford UK University of Bradford, Bradford UK
40

Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Mar 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Autumn Whalen
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues

In Process Measurement Meeting3rd September 2003

Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues

In Process Measurement Meeting3rd September 2003

Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof Phil Coates, Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof Phil Coates,

IRC in Polymer Engineering, IRC in Polymer Engineering,

Dept. Mechanical & Medical Engineering, Dept. Mechanical & Medical Engineering,

University of Bradford, Bradford UKUniversity of Bradford, Bradford UK

Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof Phil Coates, Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof Phil Coates,

IRC in Polymer Engineering, IRC in Polymer Engineering,

Dept. Mechanical & Medical Engineering, Dept. Mechanical & Medical Engineering,

University of Bradford, Bradford UKUniversity of Bradford, Bradford UK

Page 2: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

ContentsContents

• Introduction• Equipment• Process Interrogation Investigation• Micromoulding Product Property

Assessment• Final Comments

• Introduction• Equipment• Process Interrogation Investigation• Micromoulding Product Property

Assessment• Final Comments

Page 3: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Part weight 0,0008 gPart weight 0,0008 g courtesy: Battenfeldcourtesy: Battenfeld

IntroductionIntroduction

Page 4: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Battenfeld Microsystem50Battenfeld Microsystem50

•Specifically designed for moulding of products <1g

• Accurate shot dosing and high injection speed with little material wastage

• Incorporation of clean room conditions and sealing/ packaging systems

•Specifically designed for moulding of products <1g

• Accurate shot dosing and high injection speed with little material wastage

• Incorporation of clean room conditions and sealing/ packaging systems

Page 5: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Battenfeld Microsystem 50Battenfeld Microsystem 50

Page 6: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Conventional vs. MicromouldingConventional vs. Micromoulding

Conventional

• Injection control switch-over to avoid pressure ‘spike’

• Feed system vol << part volume

• Heat to be removed from product using cooling system – cycle times ~tens of seconds

Conventional

• Injection control switch-over to avoid pressure ‘spike’

• Feed system vol << part volume

• Heat to be removed from product using cooling system – cycle times ~tens of seconds

Micromoulding

• High speed injection without switchover and corresponding pressure ‘spike’ – material compression

• Feed system volume > part volume

• Very rapid freezing of material allows very low cycle times BUT smaller processing window

Micromoulding

• High speed injection without switchover and corresponding pressure ‘spike’ – material compression

• Feed system volume > part volume

• Very rapid freezing of material allows very low cycle times BUT smaller processing window

Page 7: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Dynisco PCI 4011 Piezo load transducer

Dynisco PCI 4011 Piezo load transducer

Dynisco PCI 4006 piezo load transducer

Dynisco PCI 4006 piezo load transducer

The Data Acquisition SetupThe Data Acquisition Setup

Temposonics R series displacement transducer

Temposonics R series displacement transducer

J-type thermocouplesJ-type thermocouples

Page 8: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Process InterrogationProcess Interrogation

• What can we measure to give an accurate representation of process/product quality?

• What can we measure to give an accurate representation of process/product quality?

Page 9: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Process InterrogationProcess Interrogation

• How?• Process characteristic?

• Peak injection pressure?

• How?• Process characteristic?

• Peak injection pressure?

Nylon6 NC in stepped plaque mould

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

Time (s)

Inje

cti

on

/Ca

vit

y P

res

su

re (

Mp

a)/

D

isp

lac

em

en

t (m

m)

Injection Pressure

Cavity Pressure

Page 10: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Process InterrogationProcess Interrogation

• How?• Process characteristic?

• Peak cavity pressure?

• How?• Process characteristic?

• Peak cavity pressure?

Nylon6 NC in stepped plaque mould

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

Time (s)

Inje

cti

on

/Ca

vit

y P

res

su

re (

Mp

a)/

D

isp

lac

em

en

t (m

m)

Injection Pressure

Cavity Pressure

Page 11: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Process InterrogationProcess Interrogation• How?

• Process characteristic?• Pressure/time integral?

• How?• Process characteristic?

• Pressure/time integral?

Nylon6 NC in stepped plaque mould

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

Time (s)

Inje

cti

on

/Ca

vit

y P

res

su

re (

Mp

a)/

D

isp

lac

em

en

t (m

m)

Injection Pressure

Cavity Pressure

Page 12: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Process InterrogationProcess Interrogation• How?

• Process characteristic?• Pressure/time integral?

• How?• Process characteristic?

• Pressure/time integral?

Nylon6 NC in stepped plaque mould

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

Time (s)

Inje

cti

on

/Ca

vit

y P

res

su

re (

Mp

a)/

D

isp

lac

em

en

t (m

m)

Injection Pressure

Cavity Pressure

Page 13: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Typical Micromoulding Process DataTypical Micromoulding Process Data

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Cycle No

Pre

ssu

re M

pa

Peak Injection Pressure

Peak Cavity Pressure

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Cycle No

Pre

ssu

re M

pa

Peak Injection Pressure

Peak Cavity Pressure

Mean = 99.56S.D. = 6.88

Mean = 22.50S.D. = 3.55

Page 14: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 20 40 60 80 100Cycle No

Pre

ssu

re M

pa

Injection Pressure

Cavity Pressure

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 20 40 60 80 100Cycle No

Pre

ssu

re M

pa

Injection Pressure

Cavity Pressure

Typical Process DataTypical Process Data

Mean = 78.9S.D. = 4.42

Mean = 26.83S.D. = 4.86

Nylon6 NC – Step Plaque MouldNylon6 NC – Step Plaque Mould

Page 15: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

ExperimentalExperimental

• Test response of process data to change in process conditions

• Use three different mould temperature settings during a production run

• Test response of process data to change in process conditions

• Use three different mould temperature settings during a production run

Page 16: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Experimental - step plaque mouldingExperimental - step plaque moulding

Material: HAPEX (40% sintered hydroxyapatite HDPE matrix)

Produced by IRC in Biomaterial Science

Queen Mary and Westfield College, London

Material: HAPEX (40% sintered hydroxyapatite HDPE matrix)

Produced by IRC in Biomaterial Science

Queen Mary and Westfield College, London

Page 17: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Process ConditionsProcess Conditions

Screw Speed 30rpm 30rpm 30rpm

Back Pressure 150Bar 150Bar 150Bar

Shot Size 220mm3 220mm3 220mm3

Injection Speed 500mm/s 500mm/s 500mm/s

Melt Temperature 200C 200C 200C

Mould Temperature 20C 50C 80C

Page 18: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Process DataProcess Data

Page 19: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Injection Pressure CurvesInjection Pressure Curves

Page 20: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Cavity Pressure CurvesCavity Pressure Curves

Page 21: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Product Mass – Hapex, step plaqueProduct Mass – Hapex, step plaque

0.12% variation0.12% variation

Page 22: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

ObservationsObservations

• Process measurements required in the cavity itself for accurate process monitoring

• Challenges• Size!• Techniques

• Solutions• Indirect measurements

• Ejector pins• Ultrasound

• Process measurements required in the cavity itself for accurate process monitoring

• Challenges• Size!• Techniques

• Solutions• Indirect measurements

• Ejector pins• Ultrasound

Page 23: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Product Property AssessmentProduct Property Assessment

Page 24: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Product Property AssessmentProduct Property Assessment

Conventional

• Part mass• Balance

• Dimension testing• Custom Rig• Scanner

• Mechanical testing• Instron

Conventional

• Part mass• Balance

• Dimension testing• Custom Rig• Scanner

• Mechanical testing• Instron

Micromoulding

• Part Mass• ?

• Dimension testing• Machine Vision• Atomic Force Microscopy

• Mechanical Testing• Nano-Indenting

Micromoulding

• Part Mass• ?

• Dimension testing• Machine Vision• Atomic Force Microscopy

• Mechanical Testing• Nano-Indenting

Page 25: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Machine Vision SystemsMachine Vision Systems

• Allow in-process quality control• Fully automated – removes the need for visual

inspection• Ideal for micro-scale products

• Allow in-process quality control• Fully automated – removes the need for visual

inspection• Ideal for micro-scale products

Page 26: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Machine VisionMachine Vision

• Allows detection of flawed products during the process and suitable action can be taken

• Allows detection of flawed products during the process and suitable action can be taken

Page 27: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Atomic Force MicroscopyAtomic Force Microscopy

Page 28: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

AFM – surface feature measurementAFM – surface feature measurement

AFM scan size 75 µm x 75 µm

Pitch of scroll marks ~ 6µm

AFM scan size 75 µm x 75 µm

Pitch of scroll marks ~ 6µm

Cavity Product

Page 29: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Surface feature replication -downstreamSurface feature replication -downstream

AFM scan size 75 µm x 75 µm

Pitch of scroll marks ~ 6µm

AFM scan size 75 µm x 75 µm

Pitch of scroll marks ~ 6µm

Cavity Product

Page 30: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

AFM - Morphology MeasurementAFM - Morphology Measurement

• Component sectioned using glass-knife microtomy

• Surface is etched using potassium permanganate solution to produce representative surface

• Surface imaged using AFM

• Component sectioned using glass-knife microtomy

• Surface is etched using potassium permanganate solution to produce representative surface

• Surface imaged using AFM

Surface following microtomy Surface following etching

Page 31: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Morphology Measurements – Spherulite size

Morphology Measurements – Spherulite size

Page 32: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Morphology - experimentalMorphology - experimental

Line of indents 25µm separationLine of indents 25µm separation

800 µm

Material: BP Rigidex 5050 HDPE

Melt temp: 190C

Mould temp 50C

Injection speed 500mm/s

Material: BP Rigidex 5050 HDPE

Melt temp: 190C

Mould temp 50C

Injection speed 500mm/s

250µm

Page 33: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Morphology MeasurementsMorphology Measurements

Page 34: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Morphology MeasurementsMorphology Measurements

Page 35: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Nano-IndentingNano-Indenting

Page 36: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Properties of POMC109 1.00 mm test bar

A B C

A B

CGate end

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 1 2 3 4

Mod

ulu

s (

GP

a)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Hard

nes

s (G

Pa)

Fixed

Moving

Fixed

Moving

Position

Page 37: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

ResultsResults

Page 38: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

CommentsComments

• AFM and nano-indenting very powerful techniques • + Allow direct evaluation of influence process conditions

on product properties• - Time consuming• - Sample preparation issues

• Machine Vision Systems• + Well suited for micromoulding assessment• + Performed during processing• - Cannot determine morphology/mechanical properties

• AFM and nano-indenting very powerful techniques • + Allow direct evaluation of influence process conditions

on product properties• - Time consuming• - Sample preparation issues

• Machine Vision Systems• + Well suited for micromoulding assessment• + Performed during processing• - Cannot determine morphology/mechanical properties

Page 39: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

Future experimentsFuture experiments

• Longer runs with smaller (top hat) cavity• Individual sample collection• Assessment

• Longer runs with smaller (top hat) cavity• Individual sample collection• Assessment

Page 40: Micromoulding: process repeatability + product quality issues In Process Measurement Meeting 3 rd September 2003 Dr Ben Whiteside, Dr Mike Martyn, Prof.

FinFin