Top Banner
Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005
33

Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Dec 16, 2015

Download

Documents

Britton Nash
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Microbial Source Tracking Techniques:Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies

Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute

April 14, 2005

Page 2: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Potential Sources of E. coli • CSOs, SSOs, and septic systems

• Urban and agricultural runoff

• Waterfowl, domestic pets, and wildlife

• Sand, algae, and interstitial waters

240,000 CFU/100 ml 368,000,000 CFU/g feces

250,000-500,000 CFU/100 ml

10,000-100,000 CFU/100 ml

Beach closure 235 CFU/100ml

Page 3: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

GLWI Research Areas

Fate and transport of bacteriaMilwaukee Harbor, stormwater, Lake Michigan

Sources of pollution Milwaukee Harbor, stormwater, Lake MichiganDoor, Manitowoc, Milwaukee, & Racine County Beaches

Pathogen occurrence Bradford Beach, Racine, Milwaukee Harbor

Evaluation of BMPsSouth Shore beach, green roofs and rain gardens

Page 4: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Approach to Microbial Source Tracking

1. Gather the experts and share knowledge

2. In depth spatial surveys

3. Targeted sampling to observe dynamics; modeling

4. Apply source tracking approaches: • Human vs. non-human?• Are specific groups of animals contributing?• Does sand or Cladophora act as a reservoir?

5. Manage and evaluate the problem

Page 5: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

• 900 sq mi watershed

• 410 miles of streams

• 1.3 million people

• Urban, industrial,

agricultural land uses

Milwaukee River Basin

Page 6: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Bacterial SurveysSpatial & Temporal

South Shore Beach Study: 2001 to present

Menomonee River Study: 2002

Fate and Transport Study: 2002 to present

Manitowoc & Door County Beach Surveys: 2002 - 2003

Bradford Beach Study: 2004 to present

Page 7: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

South Shore Beach

Page 8: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Spatial surveys 2001-2004

CSO - 36 hrs, SE wind

Rain, N wind No rain – SE Wind

CSO - 45 hrs, SE wind

2001

Page 9: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

riversrivers

Dry weather (baseflow) Wet weather (stormflow)

Page 10: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.
Page 11: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

South Shore Beach

Page 12: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

South Shore Beach

Page 13: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

E. Coli Level Comparisons: Current & Proposed Beach Sites

Page 14: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.
Page 15: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Menomonee River Study 2002

Determine river E. coli levels during baseflow and stormflow

Determine E. coli levels of inline stormwater entering river

Characterize “genetic profile” of E. coli in stormwater

Page 16: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Menomonee River Survey

Suburban, suburban industrialNatural bed

Urban, Concrete bed

Urban,Rehabilitated bed

Urban, industrialNatural bed

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Page 17: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

E. Coli Data Menomonee River Survey

Page 18: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Fate & Transport 2003 Spatial Survey

Page 19: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Fate & Transport

CSO EventMay, 14 2004

Page 20: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.
Page 21: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Hydrodynamic Hydrodynamic ModelModel

• HydrodynamicsHydrodynamics- Transport- Transport- Mixing- Mixing- Dilution- Dilution

• Bacterial counts Bacterial counts

Page 22: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.
Page 23: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.
Page 24: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

• Die-off is a 2nd order function

• Die off in Lake Michigan is 90% in 6-8 hours

Bacterial Die off in Lake Michigan

Page 25: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Bradford Beach in Milwaukee

Page 26: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Pre-rain 6-14-04 09:44 Post-rain 6-14-04 10:20

E. coli Survival & Persistence in the Environment

Page 27: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

E. Coli in Sand

Range

8-39,000 E. coli/100 g

Page 28: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

E. Coli Levels at Bradford Beach

Page 29: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Pearson correlation (Opt:1.00%) [0.0%-100.0%]

Rep-PCR

100

80

60

40

Rep-PCR

1

2

3

Clonal Populations Suggest Growth

E. Coli from Beach Sand

Page 30: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Bacteroides spp.

Case Studies

• Stormwater

• Beach water

• Agricultural Runoff

• Combined Sewer Overflows

Page 31: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

Description E. coliCFU/100ml

Bacteroides spp.

% Pos.

Human

% Pos.Cow

% Pos.

Beach Water – Forested Area

300-680 100 17 0

Beach Water – Resort Area

42-190 100 0 0

Beach Water –Agricultural land

1260-2500 100 0 50

Urban Beach –No outfalls

450-600 100 0 0

Urban Beach –with Outfalls

460-15,900 100 89 0

Parking Lot Runoff 300-50,000 100 0 0

Page 32: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

• Spatial surveys provide the most useful data Identify hot spots or areas of concern

• Implement targeted sampling surveys to observe site specific dynamics

• Apply source tracking approaches: Human vs. non-human?Are specific hosts contributing?Are there environmental reservoirs?

• Manage and evaluate the problem

Summary

Page 33: Microbial Source Tracking Techniques: Lake Michigan Beaches Case Studies Erika Jensen, M.S. Great Lakes WATER Institute April 14, 2005.

ResearchersAnnette DanielsAlissa SalmoreCaitlin ScopelMichelle LuebkePat BowerOla Olapade

StudentsMagnolia TulodJosh HarrisElissa LewisEmerson LeeJennifer LeeAndrew HollandBecky KirbyHilary StreetBen WestonMorgan DepasMeredith Van Dyke

Graduate StudentsMarcia SilvaSachie OwagaHeidi PirkovLiang PengSukpreet Kaur

Great Lakes WATER InstituteP.I., Dr. Sandra McLellan

Funding kindly provided byMilwaukee Metropolitan Sewage DistrictWisconsin DNRNational Institute of HealthNOAA Sea GrantSC JohnsonWisconsin Coastal Management Program