Michigan’s Economy: Past, Present, and Future Presented to: Michigan Association of Administrators of Special Education February 7, 2012 Charles L. Ballard Department of Economics Michigan State University East Lansing, MI [email protected]
Feb 25, 2016
Michigan’s Economy:Past, Present, and Future
Presented to:Michigan Association of Administrators of
Special EducationFebruary 7, 2012
Charles L. BallardDepartment of EconomicsMichigan State University
East Lansing, [email protected]
The recent recession is BY FAR the worst since the Great Depression, and the recovery continues to be long and slow.
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 4793
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
Changes in U.S. Employment, During and After the Four Most Recent Recessions
1982 Recession
1990 Recession
2001 Recession
2007-09 Recession
Number of Months From Beginning of Recession
Empl
oym
ent a
s Per
cent
of E
mpl
oym
ent a
t Beg
inni
ng o
f Rec
essi
on
In the last two years, the U.S. private sector has added 3.1 million jobs.
But public-sector employment has shrunk by 500,000.
Layoffs of teachers and police officers have put a drag on the recovery from recession.
For the U.S. as a whole, Real Gross Domestic Product has grown by nearly 5% in the last two years, while employment has grown by only 2%.
Nationally, employment is now at the same level as in the summer of 2000, but real GDP is 19% higher than it was then.
Thus “growing the economy” is not the biggest challenge. The biggest challenge is to find a way to spread the benefits of economic growth more widely.
Employment Losses During Michigan’s Structural Transformation
April 2000 – December 2000: 27,700
2001:172,700
2002: 22,200
2003: 65,100
2004: 1,500
2005: 27,500
2006: 80,400
2007: 49,700
2008:196,800
2009: 216,500
Total for the Period: 860,100
= 18.3% of the jobs in Michigan at the beginning of the slide.
But employment in Michigan increased in both 2010 and 2011.
Michigan employment is now up by about 100,000 from its low point at the end of 2009.
As a result, Michigan no longer leads the nation in the rate of unemployment.
In December 2011, the unemployment rate in Michigan was lower than in California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and the District of Columbia.
But fundamental structural changes in the U.S. economy have created big problems for the Michigan economy for a very long time.
Manufacturing’s Share of the Economy Has Shrunk Dramatically
19631965
19671969
19711973
19751977
19791981
19831985
19871989
19911993
19951997
19992001
20032005
20072009
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Manufacturing as Percent of Gross Domestic Product, For Michigan and the United States, 1963-2010
MichiganUnited States
Year
Perc
ent
In Michigan, the Decline Has Been Especially Severe in Motor
Vehicles
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Motor Vehicles and Equipment as a Percentage of Gross Product, for Michigan and the United States, 1963-2009
MichiganUnited States
Year
Perc
ent
Despite our struggles, Michigan is not a poor place.
19291933
19371941
19451949
19531957
19611965
19691973
19771981
19851989
19931997
20012005
20090
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Inflation-Adjusted Per-Capita Personal Income, In Michigan and the United States, 1929-2010
MichiganUnited States
Year
Per-
Capi
ta P
erso
nal I
ncom
e (in
201
0 Do
llars
)
Although Michigan is not a poor place, there are poor people in Michigan (and other states).
Incomes are distributed much more unequally than they were 35 years ago.
The increase in income inequality is the biggest economic story of our lifetime.
But in the first half of the 20th century, incomes in America actually became MORE equal.
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
Percentage of Income in the United States Received by the Top One Percent of Households, 1916-1976
(Source: Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez)
Including Capital Gains
Excluding Capital Gains
Year
Perc
ent
This did not happen by accident:1. Huge increases in educational
opportunity.
2. Tighter regulation of financial services.
3. Stronger labor unions.
4. More progressive taxation.
Since the 1970s, income inequality has increased dramatically:
19761978
19801982
19841986
19881990
19921994
19961998
20002002
20042006
20085
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
Percentage of Income in the United States Received by the Top One Percent of Households, 1976-2008
(Source: Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez)
Including Capital GainsExcluding Capital Gains
Year
This did not happen by accident:1. The supply of highly skilled
workers increased less than the demand.
2. Deregulation of financial services.
3. Weaker labor unions.
4. Less progressive taxation.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Percentage of Income in the United States Received by the Top One Percent of Households, 1916-2007
(Source: Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez)
Including Capital Gains
Excluding Capital Gains
Year
Perc
ent
As shown by Thomas Philippon and Ariell Reshef, financial deregulation is a big
part of the story.
Nationally, the earnings gaps between groups with different levels of educational attainment are large, and larger than they used to be.
Average Earnings in 2010, for Those Aged
45-54 Who Worked Full-Time Year-Round
(For the Entire U.S.) Men Women Professional Degree $185,034
$102,278 Master’s Degree
$112,622 $ 74,218 Bachelor’s Degree $ 90,314 $
63,004 Associate’s Degree $ 60,980 $
47,723 Some College (No Degree) $ 59,852 $
41,117 High-School Graduate $ 50,216 $
34,410 Some H.S. (No Diploma) $ 37,754 $
23,775 Less Than 9th Grade $ 31,114 $
19,996
Michigan Has Big Regional Differences in
Per-Capita Income (2009)
1. Oakland County $50,334 2. Midland County
$41,853 3. Leelanau County $39,815 5. Washtenaw County $37,859 8. Macomb County
$36,004 11. Kalamazoo County
$34,502 Michigan Average $34,315 14. Ingham County
$34,083 15. Kent County $33,635 24. Wayne County
$31,888 38. Saginaw County
$30,137 42. Genesee County $29,526 43. Jackson County
$29,488 57. Shiawassee County
$27,322 70. Tuscola County
$26,094 83. Oscoda County $22,934
Also, although Michigan is not a poor place, our economy has not grown as fast as the national average.
19501953
19561959
19621965
19681971
19741977
19801983
19861989
19921995
19982001
20042007
201085
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
Per-Capita Income: Michigan as Percent of the United States, 1950-2010
Year
Perc
ent
Many of the most successful states have high levels of educational attainment.
19501953
19561959
19621965
19681971
19741977
19801983
19861989
19921995
19982001
20042007
201085
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
Per-Capita Personal Income in Massachusetts and Michigan, As Percent of the United States, 1950-2010
MassachusettsMichigan
Year
Perc
ent
Per-Capita Income in Selected States, 2010:
Top Five, Bottom Five, and Some Between
1. Connecticut $56,001 24. Florida $39,272
2. Massachusetts $51,552 27. Wisconsin $38,432
3. New Jersey $50,781 34. Ohio $36,395
4. Maryland $49,025 36. Michigan $35,597
5. New York $48,821 41. Indiana $34,943
11. Illinois $43,159 46. Arkansas $33,150
12. California $43,104 47. West Virginia $32,641
13. Minnesota $42,843 48. Utah $32,595
16. Pennsylvania $41,152 49. Idaho $32,257
23. Texas $39,493 50. Mississippi $31,186
United States Average: $40,584
College attainment has a decisive influence on per-capita income
15 20 25 30 35 4030,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
33655
43922
3433932257
4385243021
56245
40375
39064
34849
42078
32994
42540
34543
3750938886
31936
36091 36368
48164
50897
34953
42953
30383
36356
34622
39182
4093643423
51473
33389
48809
35249
39874
3588935969 36365
39762 41261
32495
38644
34833
37809
32050
38700
44075
42747
31634
37770
48580
Income and College Attainment for the 50 States, 2008
Percent of Population with at Least a Bachelor's Degree
Per-
Cap
ita In
com
e
At a time when education is so crucial to our future, Michigan has pursued a policy of systematic disinvestment in education.
1959
-60
1962
-63
1965
-66
1968
-69
1971
-72
1974
-75
1977
-78
1980
-81
1983
-84
1986
-87
1989
-90
1992
-93
1995
-96
1998
-99
2001
-02
2004
-05
2007
-0810
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sources of Funds for Michigan State University, 1959-60 to 2009-10
Tuition & Fees
State of Michigan Appropriations
Year
Perc
ent
In order to be equivalent to the real budget reductions of the last nine years, we would have to cease state support for:
Central Michigan University, Eastern Michigan University,
Ferris State University, Grand Valley State University,
Lake Superior State University, Michigan Technological University, Northern Michigan University, Oakland University, Saginaw Valley State University, University of Michigan - Dearborn, University of Michigan - Flint, and
Western Michigan University.
Michigan is Underinvested in Education, Training, and Skill,
From Pre-School to Ph.D.
In addition to the big premium for a Bachelor’s degree, the social returns are very large for
(1) early-childhood education, and
(2) high-school completion.
As long as we stick with a nineteenth-century school year of only 180 classroom days, we simply cannot claim that we are serious about preparing for the workforce needs of the future.
Tax Effort Has Reduced Substantially
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
State and Local Taxes as Percent of Personal Income, 1972-2008
New YorkMichiganUnited StatesTexas
Year
Perc
ent
The Structural Deficit:
None of the major sources of revenue for state and local governments in Michigan keeps up with the economy.
Potential Sources of Tax Revenue for Michigan:• Extend the sales tax to services and entertainments.
• Establish a graduated income tax, or at least raise the flat rate of the current income tax.
More Potential Revenue Sources
Decouple from the Federal Estate Tax, so that we can once again collect estate taxes.
Convert the excise taxes on beer and wine to a percentage basis, and/or return them to earlier levels.
Continue to chip away at the vast array of small tax expenditures.
What does the future hold?
In the words of Yogi Berra:
“It’s tough to make predictions, especially
about the future.”
2011 was a bumpy year:• Tsunami in Japan
• Turmoil in the Middle East
• Debt worries in Europe
• Sluggish growth in the U.S.
• Debt-ceiling circus in Washington
Historically, the recovery from a financial crisis has often been long and slow.
European debt is the biggest concern for the U.S. economy in the near term.
The growth of federal government debt is the biggest concern for the U.S. economy in the medium to long term.
In the last 42 years, the Federal Government has balanced its budget only four times.
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
estim
ate0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Federal Government Receipts and Expenditures as Percent of GDP, 1930-2009, with Estimates to 2015
ReceiptsOutlays
Year
Perc
ent
1954
1957
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
estimate
2014
estimate
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
Federal Government Receipts and Expenditures as Percent of GDP, 1954-2009, with Estimates to 2015
ReceiptsOutlays
Year
Perc
ent
1940
1943
1946
1949
1952
1955
1958
1961
1964
1967
1970
1973
1976
1979
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
2003
2006
2009
2012
est.
2015
est.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Gross Federal Debt as Percent of GDP, 1940-2009, With Estimates to 2015
Year
Perc
ent
It’s not just the Federal Government that forgot how to save.
Private citizens in the U.S. also forgot how to save. That’s why we borrow so much from abroad.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12Pe
rcen
t
Year
Net Private Saving As Percent of Gross National Income, For the United States, 1950-2008
Better Attitudes for a Better Michigan
A Culture of Lifelong Learning
Innovation and Entrepreneurship
An End to Bitter Partisanship
A Positive Attitude, to Keep Going Through Difficult Times
Michigan, My MichiganA song to thee, fair State of mine,
Michigan, my Michigan.But greater song than this is
thine,Michigan, my Michigan.
The whisper of the forest tree,The thunder of the inland sea,Unite in one grand symphony
Of Michigan, my Michigan.