Top Banner
GETTING PAID! The Path from Approval to Market and Navigating the World of Reimbursement 1 David J. Farber Preeya Noronha Pinto King & Spalding [email protected] mHealth Israel Google Tel Aviv Campus January 31, 2018
46

mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Jan 29, 2018

Download

Healthcare

Levi Shapiro
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

GETTING PAID!The Path from Approval to Market and Navigating the World of Reimbursement

1

David J. FarberPreeya Noronha Pinto

King & [email protected]

mHealth IsraelGoogle Tel Aviv Campus

January 31, 2018

Page 2: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Objectives

2

Page 3: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Why are we here? What is our goal?• FDA approval is NOT the goal – it is a step to

the goal• Getting to market to get PAID is the goal• How do we get to market in the US?

― What is the market?― Who buys out product?― Who pays the buyer?

― Will they cover it?― Can they see it?― How much will they pay?

3

Page 4: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Agenda

4

Page 5: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

CMS vs. FDACMS FDA

“reasonable and necessary” “reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness”

CMS coverage determination (formal or informal) FDA-approved labeling

Focus on health benefits Focus on device function and clinical risk vs. benefits

Economic data is important Economic data is irrelevant

Superiority endpoint required Non-inferiority endpoint acceptable

Focus on Medicare beneficiaries Focus on intended population

Public processes Generally not public processes

Publishes proposed decisions Does not publish proposed decisions

5

Page 6: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

CMS vs. FDA: Regulatory Expectations

6

Page 7: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

CMS vs. FDA: Decisions

7

Page 8: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

CMS vs. FDA: Information Considered

8

Page 9: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

So What Do You Need to Get Paid?• Studies and Evidence

― Two Double Blind RCTs― Data in 65+ age group

• Published in Credible Journals• Health Economics Outcomes Research (HEOR)

― Budget Impact Modeling (BIM)

Page 10: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

The Basics of Reimbursement

10

Page 11: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Overview of Medicare Coverage

11

Page 12: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Who Makes Medicare Coverage Decisions?• Determinations by CMS and its contractors

― National Coverage Determinations (NCDs)― Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs)― Individual Consideration

12

Page 13: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Overview of NCDs

13

Page 14: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Coverage with Evidence Development

14

Evidence-based coverage paradigm that permits CMS to develop coverage policies for certain items and services that are likely to show

health benefits to Medicare beneficiaries but for which the available evidence base is not yet sufficiently developed

Page 15: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

NCD Process

15

Page 16: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Overview of LCDs

16

Page 17: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

NCD vs. LCD?

17

Page 18: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Overview of Coding

18

Page 19: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Types of Codes

Type of Code Coding System Who Sets Code? Who Uses Code?

Diagnosis ICD-10-CM, Diagnoses, Vols. 1 & 2

WHO and NCHS All Providers

Procedure or Service ICD-10-CM, Procedures, Vol. 3 WHO and CMS Hospital Inpatient

Procedure or Service CPT-4 AMA Physicians, Hospital Outpatient, Clinical Labs, etc.

Products and Certain Services HCPCS CMS Physicians, Hospital Outpatient, DMEPOS Suppliers, etc.

Drugs NDC FDA Pharmacies, etc.

19

ICD-10-CM: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification

CPT-4: Current Procedural Terminology, 4th Edition

HCPCS: Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System

NDC: National Drug Code

WHO: World Health Organization

NCHS: National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

AMA: American Medical Association

DMEPOS: Durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies

Page 20: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Overview of CPT Codes

20

Page 21: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Process for Obtaining a CPT Code

21

The deadline for applications for the 2018 CPT codeset has passed. June 13, 2017 (for the September 2017 CPT Editorial Panel meeting) is the deadline for applications for the 2019 CPT codeset.

Category III codes are released on January 1 and July 1 and are effective six months later.

Page 22: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Criteria for Obtaining a Category I CPT Code

22

Page 23: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Overview of HCPCS Codes

23

Page 24: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Process for Obtaining a Permanent HCPCS Code

24

Page 25: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Criteria for Obtaining a Permanent HCPCS Code

25

Page 26: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Overview of Medicare Payment

26

Page 27: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Key Medicare Payment SystemsSite of Service Type of Payment Methodology Codes Claimed to Generate

Payment AmountNew Technology Payment

Program

Hospital Inpatient IPPS MS-DRG Bundle (per discharge) (Medicare Part A)

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes, ICD-10 Procedure Codes

Add-On Payment

Hospital Outpatient OPPS APC Package (per procedure) (Medicare Part B)

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes, CPT Codes, HCPCS Codes

Pass-Through StatusNew Technology APC

Physician Physician Fee Schedule (Medicare Part B)

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes, CPT Codes, HCPCS Codes

DMEPOS DMEPOS Fee Schedule or Competitive Bidding (Medicare

Part B)

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes, HCPCS Codes

Clinical Laboratory Tests Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (Medicare Part B)

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes, CPT Codes

27

IPPS: Inpatient Prospective Payment System

MS-DRG: Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group

OPPS: Outpatient Prospective Payment System

APC: Ambulatory Payment Classification

Page 28: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Payments for New Technology

28

Page 29: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Inpatient Add-On Payment (NTAP): Criteria

29

“Substantially similar” means that (1) a product uses the same or a similar mechanism of action to achieve a therapeutic outcome; (2) a product is assigned to the same MS-DRG; and (3) the new use of the technology involves the treatment of the same or

similar type of disease and the same or similar patient population.

The MS-DRG payment is inadequate for a new technology if the charges for cases involving the new technology exceed certain threshold amounts.

“Substantial clinical improvement” criterion is evaluated using a number of factors, including whether other treatments are available for the patient population, whether the device enables earlier diagnosis and treatment, and whether clinical outcomes are

improved.

Page 30: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Inpatient Add-On Payment (NTAP): Payment

30

Page 31: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Outpatient Pass-Through Status: Criteria

31

“Not insignificant” criterion requires a three-part test: (1) the estimated average reasonable cost of devices in the category exceeds 25% of the applicable APC payment amount for the service associated with the category of devices; (2) the estimated

average reasonable cost of the devices in the category exceeds the cost of the device-related portion of the APC payment amount for the service associated with the category of devices by at least 25%; and (3) the difference between the estimated

average reasonable cost of the devices in the category and the portion of the APC payment amount determine to be associated with the device in the associated APC exceeds 10% of the total APC payment.

“Substantial clinical improvement” criterion is evaluated using a number of factors, including whether other treatments are available for the patient population, whether the device enables earlier diagnosis and treatment, and whether clinical outcomes are

improved.

Page 32: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Outpatient Pass-Through Status: Payment

32

Page 33: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Outpatient New Technology APC: Criteria

33

Page 34: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Outpatient New Technology APC: Payment

34

Page 35: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Payment for Clinical Lab Tests

35

Data Collection Period: January – June 2016

Data Reporting Period: January – March 2017 (recently

extended to May 30, 2017)

Public Meeting in July 2017

Payment Rates Published in September 2017

Page 36: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Medicare Coverage of IDE Devices

36

FDA Categorization of Approved IDEs

New FDA-CMS Memorandum of Understanding effective June 2016 allows for change from Category A to Category B

Page 37: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

NCD for Routine Costs in Clinical Trials

37

Page 38: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

And a Word about Drugs/Biologicals…. Those Covered Under Medicare Part B

38

Page 39: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Medicare Payment SystemsSite of Service Type of Payment

MethodologyCodes Claimed to Generate

Payment AmountNew Technology Payment

Program

Hospital Inpatient IPPS MS-DRG Bundle (per discharge) (Part A)

ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes, ICD-9 Procedure Codes

Add-on payment or special MS-DRG assignment

Hospital Outpatient OPPS APC Package (per procedure) (Part B)

ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes, CPT Codes, HCPCS Codes

Pass-through status or New Tech APC

Physician Physician Fee Schedule & ASP Methodology (Part B)

ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes, CPT Codes HCPCS Codes

None

Pharmacy Fee Schedule (Part B) or Negotiated Rates (Part D)

HCPCS Codes, NDCs None

39

IPPS: Inpatient Prospective Payment SystemMS-DRG: Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related GroupOPPS: Outpatient Prospective Payment SystemAPC: Ambulatory Payment Classification

Note: Medicare Advantage payment methodologies vary!

Page 40: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Part B vs. Part D Coverage Issues

40

Medicare Part D covers most prescription drugs/biologicals obtained at the pharmacy and does not cover any drugs/biologicals covered under Medicare Parts A and B

Medicare Part B provides limited coverage for drugs/biologicals

Page 41: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Medicare Part D – Formulary Design

41

Page 42: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Tips for New Product Development

42

Page 43: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Tips for New Product Development

43

Page 44: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Tips for New Product Development

44

Page 45: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Tips for New Product Development

45

Page 46: mHealth Israel_US Reimbursement_David Farber_King & Spalding

Key Takeaway

46