Mexico Energy report February 2012
FOCUS REPORTS 1February 2012 1
MexicoEnergy reportFebruary 2012
For exclusive interviews
and more information,
log on to
energy.focusreports.net
FOCUS REPORTS 3February 2012 3
This report was
distributed in
FOCUS REPORTS4 February 2012
Providing Integrated Services throughthe oil and gas value chain
�������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������
Marine operations, offshore services and maintenance of underwater oil transportation pipelines and platforms
Comprehensive services for the exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons in mature fields of oil and gas
Natural gas distribution for residential, commercial and industrial clients
EPC of industrial procesing facilities
CarDiav_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 11:33 AM
FOCUS REPORTS 5February 2012 5
Mexico: Time for action!
It is home to the world’s
second largest non-public
company by market
value, with assets totaling U$
417.75 billion; it has been the
US’ second or third biggest
oil provider in the last three
years with imports of more
than 1 million bbl/d; as of
2010, it ranked seventh among
world oil producers, ahead of
Norway, the United Kingdom,
Venezuela, Iraq, and Brazil; it is
a stable and plural democracy
with free trade agreements
with all major economies; its
oil and gas sector contributes
to more than a third of the
national government budget
and 15% of its exports; and
violence is actually lower than
in its other three major Latin
American oil and gas counter-
parts Colombia, Venezuela or
Brazil. It’s Mexico.
This sponsored supplement was produced by Focus Reports. Project Director: Mary Carmen Luna. Project Coordinator: Maria Elena Gomez. Edited by Henrique Bezerra. Contributors: Maite Reyes. Project Supervi-
sor: Crystelle Coury. For exclusive interviews and more info, plus log onto www.energy.focusreports.net
or write to [email protected]
www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 55
Cover. Courtesy of Pemex
advertisement
FOCUS REPORTS6 February 201256 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
One must wonder how broken
the Mexican PR machine is. Although
most news that crosses the Rio
Grande is soaked in stereotypes of
slow-moving bureaucracy, production
and reserve declines (all of them true
to a certain degree), the opportu-
nities hidden south of the border
outweigh those challenges by far.
That is not to say that the Mexican
oil and gas industry is not at a crossroads. Its oil output has fallen
from 3.5 million bbl/d in 2004 to a projection of 2.6 million bbl/d in
2012. Though the government says it has reached the bottom, the US
Energy Department projects that, if current trends and policies are left
unchanged, the Mexican oil production will decline by an additional
600,000 bbl/d by 2020, transforming what was once the second biggest
oil exporter into a net importer. The consequences of such a scenario
would be devastating not only for Mexico itself but for the US as well.
If Mexico becomes a net oil importer, America’s desire to decrease its
energy dependency from “unreliable sources” elsewhere would be
seriously jeopardized.
But PEMEX, the NOC that holds
the monopoly over all hydrocarbons
under Mexican soil, has a some-
what different production scenario
for the coming years. Even though
reserves have fallen for the 12th
consecutive year up to 2010, when
proved reserves fell 1.4 percent to
the equivalent of 13.8 billion barrels
of oil, the company is hoping to
replicate its apparent success in 2011 in stabilizing its proved reserves.
From 2013 on, it hopes to increase its net proven reserves in order to
augment its production to around 3.3 million bbl/d by 2024 and add to
its current reserves’ life of about 10 years.
To increase production from 2.6 to 3.3 million bbl/d in more than
twelve years doesn’t seem like a very big challenge at first sight. Many
down play it by comparing it with Petrobras’ production targets for the
same period, where production would grow from around 2 to more
than 6 million bbl/d. However, such a comparison is misleading. In
contrast with countries like Brazil, which have continuously invested in
exploration due to its historical oil scarcity, Mexico has had it easy for a
Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel, general director of Pemex
Ing. Carlos Morales Gill, director of E&P Pemex
Oil production evolution
Source: www.pemex.com
3,500
Cantarell
MesozoicChiapas-Tabasco
Ku-Maloob-Zaap
Teritary-age �elds and other ones (mainly Tampico-Misantla basin)
Other offshore �elds
60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 70 71 72 73 75 76 77 78 80 81 82 83 85 86
Years
87 88 90 91 92 93 95 96 97 98 00 01 02 03 05 06 07 08 10 11
South-easternbasins
Tho
usan
d, b
/d
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
•In the 60s the oil production came mainly from Poza Rica and San Adres fields in the Northern Region, as well as from the Cinco Presidentes and Sánchez Magallanes fields in the Southern Region.
•In the mid-70s the Samaria, Sitio grande, Cactus, Agave and Cunduacán fields from the Chiapas-Tabasco Mesozoic were incorporated, all of them part of the Southeast-
ern Basins.•In the late 70s and early 80s, the development of the offshore fields Akal, Nohoch, Ku,
and Abkatún was initiated, all of them also located at the Southeastern Basins.•In 2004, the Cantarell field started its predicted natural production decline•Since 2009 the crude oil production has stabilized
FOCUS REPORTS 7February 2012 7
CarKidd_OGFJ_1202 1 1/25/12 4:25 PM
FOCUS REPORTS8 February 201258 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
long time.
The reason behind this is Cantarell Mega Field. Discovered in the
mid 1970s and located 50 miles offshore in the Bay of Campeche, it has
generated more than half a trillion $US in revenue for PEMEX. Produc-
tion in 1981 was 1.16 million bbl/d and had fallen to 1 million bbl/d by
1995. However, a nitrogen injection EOR project increased production
to 2.14 million bbl/d in 2004, when it reached its peak. Since then,
production has fallen to a staggeringly low 558,000 bbl/d. This obliged
Mexico to further exploit its existing reserves in order to avoid a supply
shock, making it dangerously dependent on mature reserves. When
compared with that of Saudi Arabia, Mexico’s production is one to four,
whereas the proven reserves of the former are one to twenty.
Faced with such a scenario, Juan Josè Sùarez Coppel, PEMEX gen-
eral director, tried to shed some light on optimistic future production
targets, “Our plan is to reach 2.7 million bpd by the end of 2012 and
hit 3 million bbl/d by 2017-2018. This will of course require significant
investments and we therefore need to invest in addition to the U$ 22-24
billion planned”. Besides strong investments in EOR, Suárez Coppel,
is also betting on the potential of natural gas in Mexico, “In the past, a
lack of investment led to the decline in non-associated gas production
in the Veracruz and Burgos basins. But today we have discovered very
Oil production scenario
Source: Pemex
2,700 3,000
Cantarell
Tsimin-Xux
Ku Maloob Zaap
Chicontepec
Future development onshore
Ayatsil-Tekel
Future development offshore
Deepwater
Exploitation
(without Cantarell, Chicontepec, Ku Maloob Zaap,Ayatsil-Tekel and Tsimin-Xux
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Tho
usan
ds
of
bar
rels
per
day
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
CarFCM_OGFJ_1202 1 1/25/12 9:58 AM
FOCUS REPORTS 9February 2012 9www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 59
volume. According to Morales, there is potential to extract at least
twice as much.
But PEMEX cannot do all this on its own. “We need to look at
additional capacity for those mature fields, which is why we are trying
to bring in people through new contracts. The first incentive-based
contracts (IBCs) biddings have been going on for a while and so far we
CarCiat_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 11:21 AM
significant gas fields in deepwater and we expect production to start
by 2015. Last but not least, I believe we also have opportunities in our
shale gas potential.”
Carlos Morales, PEMEX E&P general director is more specific; “Two
years ago, we discovered Lakach deepwater natural gas field and more
recently Piklis, which together form part of the same sub-basin in the
Gulf’s deepwaters. This discovery also means that PEMEX has entered
into a challenging area of deepwater operations. At 1,900 meters
(6,000 feet) this is the deepest well that we have drilled.” The stakes
in these fields are high; Lakach together with Piklis has the potential
to produce approximately 800 bcf, which equates to 80 percent of the
country’s current gas imports.
“We have an assessment of approximately 28 billion barrels of oil
equivalent of prospective resources and we are going to speed up the
exploration process in deepwaters to hopefully deliver the expected
results”, says Morales. If PEMEX wants to bring its future production
targets any closer to its 3 million bbl/d, it had better invest heavily and
quickly.
After discovering the Mesozoic
basins in the South and the Gulf
of Campeche in the early 1970s,
PEMEX has essentially abandoned
mature fields without extracting
the reserves that were still in place.
Therefore, there is still a great poten-
tial for those fields, since the country
has only extracted 17 percent of their
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Exploitation 1,230 1,182 1,116 1,068 1,005 968 942 916 851 778 680 599 538 465 411
Cantarell 444 469 466 434 360 278 238 222 200 196 191 180 168 159 150
Chincontepec 79 82 84 89 118 152 203 246 293 363 433 485 521 530 542
Ku-Maloob-Zaap 847 834 850 855 846 840 751 627 556 457 382 337 294 254 214
Tsimin-Xux 2 27 71 107 125 120 112 101 84 72 59 40 23 14 9
Ayatsil-Tekel 0 0 16 41 66 93 102 101 98 91 80 69 46 41 36
FD onshore 0 11 48 100 157 211 256 290 337 384 405 429 456 481 488
FD offshore 0 0 3 27 120 259 394 486 547 605 663 717 763 800 835
Deepwaters 0 — — — — — — — 26 85 129 169 243 313 422
Total 2,602 2,605 2,654 2,721 2,797 2,921 2,998 2,990 2,992 3,031 3,022 3,025 3,052 3,057 3,107
Source: PEMEX
Dr. Juan Carlos Zepeda Molina - president of the CNH
OIl production Scenario — Thousands of barrels per day
FOCUS REPORTS10 February 2012
CarDem_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 1:21 PM
FOCUS REPORTS 11February 2012 11
CarDem_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 1:21 PM
www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 61
take so long to start working with other international partners who have
the technology and expertise to safeguard Mexico’s energy security?
Politics, of course.
First reformWhen Felipe Calderón took office as President of Mexico in 2006, he
made the so-called “Mexican energy reform” the backbone of his
modernization roadmap for the Mexican economy during his six year
mandate. In the midst of a sharp oil production decline and the emer-
gence of other successful regional NOCs that were partially privatized
and exposed to a competitive environment, many expected Mexico to
follow suit and open up its energy sector for private competition, allow-
ing national and international companies to compete with PEMEX for
Mexico’s hydrocarbon reserves. However, those who thought so under-
estimated Mexicans’ strong nationalistic feelings towards its oil and gas
reserves. A national holiday recalling the day on which President Lázaro
Cardenas nationalized the oil industry (March 18, 1938) is the strongest
have had very good responses from the interested parties. We have 45
bases and 22 companies for sale and overall we believe we have very
strong offers on the table that are attractive to the industry”, Morales
acknowledged while the bids were still going on. These biddings
resulted in the signing of three IBCs in late 2011 with multinational
companies, one with Schlumberger and two with Petrofac.
The Mexican oil and gas industry most certainly offers a great deal of
challenges, as well as opportunities. The huge investments announced
for the coming ten years have raised eyebrows everywhere, and it is
undeniable that the country has woken up to the need to modernize its
oil and gas industry. The question of when Mexico will really loosen up
its grip on its hydrocarbon reserves is, as usual, more a question of how
much more pain will it take to convince Mexican legislators to ask for
help. Hopefully for Mexico and its neighbor to the north, it won’t take
too long.
If production peaked in 2004 and PEMEX was already clearly inca-
pable of maintaining and increasing production on its own, why did it
CarNuv_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 1:54 PM
FOCUS REPORTS12 February 201262 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
symbol of Mexico’s oil nationalism.
After years of political debate, the energy reform was passed in 2008, only to have important
parts of it taken to the Supreme Courts, which ultimately acknowledged its constitutionality. The
main aspect of the reform was the introduction of the new Incentive Based Contracts (IBCs),
replacing the multiple-service contracts (MSC) offered in 2003. The latter allowed PEMEX to hire
contractors only on a set-fee basis, operators owned no equity in projects and were unable to
book reserves. These contractors received no extra benefits if their work boosted production
beyond what was required by their contract. By contrast, the new IBCs offer performance-linked
rewards and more flexible remuneration for operators in the case of oil-price hikes.
“Clearly the reforms have provided a great level of flexibility to PEMEX. Now the company
has the flexibility to enter, design and implement contracts pretty much like any NOC or IOC, to
a great extent”, says Rogelio Lopez-Velarde of law firm LVHS. “One of the most important items
of the reform is that it changed the architectural institutional framework of Mexico. To some
extent now there is a definition of who is the policy maker (the Ministry of Energy); who is the
regulator (the CNH, which stands for National Commission for Hydrocarbons); and who is the
operator (PEMEX)”, he concludes. However, the reform failed to allow ownership of reserves, not
granting permission to build and run refineries either, as President Calderòn had proposed.
As explained by CNH’s president Dr. Juan Carlos Zepeda Molina, CNH’s responsibilities can
be summed up into four main categories: technical regulation and enforcement in the upstream
oil and gas industries; technical assessment of all exploration and production projects; determina-
tion of the country’s hydrocarbon reserves; and the provision of advisory activities for the Ministry
of Energy.
Even though the Mexican oil and gas sector is becoming more flexible and open, most
companies still depend directly on PEMEX’s choices and its ultimate fate. To say that there is no
flourishing Mexican oil and gas industry without PEMEX is as true as to say that there is a flourish-
ing Mexican oil and gas industry in spite of PEMEX.
PEMEX predominant role is felt at all levels. And it takes stamina to thrive in Mexico’s overly
concentrated market with merely one order giver. Rolando Maggi, CEO of FCM, the exclusive
representative of Kimray Inc.’s control equipment products and also holder of other partner-
ships with foreign companies, “One of the biggest challenges faced in the Mexican oil and
gas industry is the purchasing system, where the law forbids direct purchasing from PEMEX for
new products. Hence even if one has the best product it needs to go through a public bidding
process. Saying that, you end up doing two sales: to PEMEX and to all the bidders. As you can
imagine, the process tends to be very slow”, explained the young CEO.
Most of the changes and reforms highlighted were driven more by PEMEX’s changing needs
than Mexico’s. While the two are not mutually exclusive, but they are certainly not the same.
PEMEX’s role as a company is disguised and is still considered by many as a de facto public regu-
lator due to its monopolistic market control.
CarProm_OGFJ_1202 1 1/23/12 2:03 PM
FOCUS REPORTS 13February 2012 13www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 63
were responsible for the lion’s share of Mexico's conventional thermal
generation mix feedstock. However, even before the 2008 energy
reform, natural gas consumption for electricity generation had risen dra-
matically and natural gas is now the dominant feedstock in the Mexican
Energy mix.
Unsurpisingly, PEMEX dominates Mexico’s natural gas value chain.
PEMEX itself is the single largest consumer of natural gas, representing
around 40 percent of domestic demand. It also operates over 5,700
miles of natural gas pipelines in Mexico and has twelve natural gas
processing centers, with liquids extraction capacity of 5.9 Bcf per day in
2010. Mexico’s natural gas pipeline network includes ten active import
connections with the United States. In 2010, Mexico imported 342 Bcf
of natural gas from the United States, while it exported 30 Bcf to the
United States.
Natural gas’ midstream and downstream sectors were liberalized by
previous reforms in the 1990s and early 2000s. Thanks to these, vast
opportunities were opened to companies such as GDF Suez. The com-
Nevertheless the creation of CNH was an acknowledgement by
Mexican legislators that, even though state-owned, PEMEX could not
regulate its own activities while safeguarding the long-term interest
of Mexico’s energy security. Clearly, Cantarell’s fast and, according
to some, irresponsible depletion left its scars. Zepeda Molina puts it
bluntly; “No oil company in the world is capable of developing the
resources that we have here in Mexico by itself. PEMEX needs new
partnerships. Hence, the full implementation of the new IBCs is crucial
and central for the challenges that we are facing now.”
PEMEX is expected to apply the new IBC to mature northern fields,
such as the onshore Chicontepec basin and the deepwaters of the Gulf
of Mexico (GOM). Chicontepec's output, PEMEX hopes, could rise to
around 70,000 b/d with the right kind of investment.
On that note, Juan Manuel Delgado, general director, Schlum-
berger Oilfield Services Mexico and Central America comments, “A
lot of people compare Chicontepec to Cantarell, which is misleading.
Chicontepec is one of those unique fields where even with all the tools
available today it is not easy to understand and follow the continuity
and multiple compartments of its reservoirs. Exploitation of Chicon-
tepec does not have a magic solution and it is not, by any means,
straightforward. There is no one simple field development plan that
will lead to immediate success like in the majority of other fields. With
fields in the southern part of the country, it is hard to reach the oil, but
once you have achieved this, it is relatively easy to extract. Chicontepec
is the opposite.”
It's no wonder that so much emphasis is given to Chicontepec’s
exploration. PEMEX to date has spent more than U$ 5 billion in devel-
oping the Chicontepec field, which has resulted in less than 60,000
bbl/d even though the field contains around 17.7 billion boe of possible
reserves.
The 2008 energy reform package also contained specific features
related to renewable energy, energy efficiency and other important
environment-related issues. In one of their most sensible acts, Mexican
legislators acknowledged the country’s need to depend less on oil, now
an expensive and scarce resource, while also taking measures to comply
with Mexico’s international environmental obligations embodied in trea-
ties such as the Kyoto Protocol.
According to Mexico’s Energy Secretariat (Sener), fuel oil and diesel
CarEcot_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 11:43 AM
FOCUS REPORTS14 February 2012
CarProy_OGFJ_1202 1 1/26/12 5:25 PM
64 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
pany country manager, Germain Manchon explains: “GDF Suez is the
number one private sector natural gas transmission company in Mexico,
with over 900 km of pipelines constructed, and we are the second most
important natural gas distribution company in Mexico, serving 400,000
customers through our 6 distribution companies. The company also has
some participation in the power sector with over 300 MW of cogenera-
tion-installed capacity.”
Based on the new Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) require-
ments, Mexico has a huge need for energy infrastructure in the next
10 years. “GDF Suez is a world leader in terms of the management of
pipes and infrastructure, so I believe we have much to offer. Gas distri-
bution of course is also important because Mexico needs to incentivize
a higher market penetration”, highlights Manchon, who also notes that
the company is increasingly thinking about how they can introduce
Life without Pemex
In a context where most suppliers
depend on PEMEX contracts, the past
5 years have been stressful. “The past
five years have been difficult and we barely
survived because it was taking PEMEX
so long to issue new contracts,” explains
Abelardo Rivera Lechuga, general man-
ager of Proyectos Peninsulares. It must be
acknowledged that the historic partnership
Proyectos Peninsulares has with Rockwell
Automation to install and maintain their Allen
Bradley technology in Mexico was a lifesaver,
“like rain in the desert”. Tired of waiting
for the renewal of PEMEX contracts, Rivera
Lechuga took a drastic decision that could
look suicidal in the Mexican context: “we do
not participate in public biddings anymore.
For automation projects
we go with Rockwell, but
apart from that we do
not participate in PEMEX
biddings anymore”, he
explains.
He prefers to “fight
the stereotypes about
Mexicans being lazy,
untrustworthy and having
poor work ethic” and
offer the company’s thirty-year experience in
electric and mechanical services to new-
comers and notably to drilling companies
coming from as far away as China to drill in
Mexico, rather than dealing
with the frustration gener-
ated by the perception that
some of PEMEX biddings
might be designed for a
company specifically, or
that “you need an internal
contact in Pemex to win a
contract”. “In general and
in the current Mexican con-
text I think there are more
opportunities to work for private companies
than for PEMEX” concludes Rivera Lechuga.
Ing. Abelardo Rivera Lechuga, general director of Proyectos peninsulares
FOCUS REPORTS 15February 2012 15
Integrated services from PetrofacPetrofac is a leading international provider of facilities solutions to the oil & gas industry.
We design and build oil & gas facilities; operate, maintain and manage facilities and train personnel;
enhance production; and, where appropriate invest to offer an integrated solution for upstream and
infrastructure developments.
Our Integrated Energy Services division enables Petrofac’s existing capability, from engineering
& construction through to sub-surface management, to be harnessed and packaged to create value
for customers through the delivery of our services.
To learn more visit www.petrofac.com
CarPetr_OGFJ_1202 1 1/23/12 11:39 AM
FOCUS REPORTS16 February 201266 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
environmental services in their offers,
as a response to Mexico’s growing
environmental concerns.
…..Then PerformPetrofac won international head-
lines by securing the first ever IBC
in Mexico for the Santuario and
Magallanes fields. As explained by
Harry Bockmeulen, general manager of Petrofac Mexico, “The basis of
the contract is a fee per barrel paid by PEMEX and reimbursement of
some capital costs. PEMEX asked companies to bid a fee per barrel to
produce over and above a certain minimum production that exists in
the fields. They will give us a fee for all incremental production above
that. Petrofac will invest and PEMEX will repay up to 75% of that
amount.” The IBC was strategic not only for its profit prospects, but by
the precedent it opened for Petrofac. “It is not a one-off opportunity.
PEMEX announced multiple similar opportunities in the future and
this seemed like a good place for
us to start in Latin America”, says
Bockmeulen.
According to him, contractually
Petrofac will spend approximately
U$ 200 million in the first two years
in both blocks, which is a function of
PEMEX’s contract bidding conditions
and the minimum expenditure levels
that were part of the bidding pro-
cess. The minimum development spend on the fields over the 25-year
contracts is approximately U$500 million. “The contracts are very well
designed to incentivize the contractor to maximize production and we
will look for every opportunity to do so”, Bockmeulen concludes.
In a market that many regard as impenetrable and even xenophobic,
the key to winning such a strategic bid was to have established offices
in the country and to have build up a local network prior to that. As
Bockmeulen puts it, “Doing so establishes a credibility that you are
CarCC_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 10:04 AM
Ing. Harry Bockmeulen, general director México, Petrofac
Ing. Juan Manuel Delgado, general director of Schlumberger Oilfield Services Mexico and Central America
FOCUS REPORTS 17February 2012 17www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 67
seriously interested in coming here and it gives you an opportunity to
establish relationships with people who you hope to work with in the
future. I know that PEMEX is contemplating a second round of contracts
sometime soon. Petrofac is focusing very much on delivering the first
two fields but we will study what PEMEX has to offer in rounds two,
three, and four.”
Schlumberger, the other winner of the first IBCs bidding round,
had the contract assigned after the original winner failed to meet the
requirements for the Carrizo field in southern Mexico. According to Del-
gado, “2011 has been a good year to explore and consolidate different
prospects in the industry around the so-called ‘mature fields contracts’.
They will add more activity and bring more players into the picture,
helping PEMEX increase its oil production. Although they might not yet
have had as great an impact as PEMEX initially hoped for, they are a
good way to start the Mexican model of private company participation
in the oil and gas production industry. It is clear, however, that PEMEX
is the only company taking equity on
the assets, and any changes to this
would be left to the government to
decide. We, as a service industry,
have to comply with the rules of the
game set by PEMEX and the govern-
ment.” Prior to this, Schlumberger
had won the highest number of
contracts in Mexico amongst oilfield
service providers over the past 12
years.
The new IBCs are also expanding the options to existing local EPC
players. Nuvoil, a company traditionally focused on the management
and treatment of natural gas from well to sale points, is interested in
the opportunities they could create in oil assets through partnership
with other companies,. Mariano Hernández, Nuvoil’s director, explains
how, “Nuvoil is aligning itself with a third company involved in the
exploration of oil. Our aim is to participate in the IBCs expected for
2012. Nuvoil wants to have more strategic alliances while continuing
to strengthen cooperation with the most technologically-advanced
companies present in the Mexican market”. Nuvoil already enjoys a
strategic partnership with Calgary-based TESCO Corporation.
Instead of fearing the new competition brought by the flock of for-
eign companies considering Mexico’s friendlier regulatory environment,
Hernandez believes that competition will force local players to invest
in productivity. “There is a certain sense of excessive comfort enjoyed
Ing. Mariano Hernández, director of Nuvoil
PEMEX's Maritime Terminal Pajaritos in Coatzacaolcos Vercruz. Courtesy of Pemex.
Don’t Forget the People
Jorge Chiprés, managing direc-
tor of Ecoterra, a young start-
up made up of experienced
environment-related analysts, stresses
that even though Mexico’s environmen-
tal standards are not as high as in some
developed markets, they are getting there,
“Today, Mexican service providers are
adapting to supply the industry’s changing
environmental needs. At the same time, the
government is making an effort to clarify its
rules and solve old environmental issues.
The industry and the government are going
hand in hand towards the higher develop-
ment of Mexican environmental services”.
On the other hand, Chiprés stresses
that efforts still need to be made on social
assessment, and which are at the heart
of their current success: “How many
environmental assessment projects have
we seen fail because they didn’t take
into consideration the social component?
For Ecoterra, the social and economic
impacts of industrial projects are as
important as the purely environmental
impacts; this is our edge over other play-
ers in our niche”, he explains.
FOCUS REPORTS18 February 2012
CarPro_OGFJ_1202 1 1/23/12 5:41 PM
FOCUS REPORTS 19February 2012 19
CarPro_OGFJ_1202 1 1/23/12 5:41 PM
www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 69
by local firms, thanks to the lack of local com-
petition, they are not investing much in their
competitiveness and end up losing opportuni-
ties in countries like Colombia, Bolivia or Peru;
this is not the case of Nuvoil.” Hopefully new
measures such as the IBCs will bring more
competition to Mexico’s still “overly comfort-
able” market.
Oscar Vázquez Sentíes, CEO of Grupo Dia-
vaz, makes the following assessment of IBCs,
“The previous type of contracts were limited
in that companies like Grupo Diavaz were only
providing what our customer asked for, and
were not including new ideas or new technolo-
gies and also the services were not oriented
to produce more, they were oriented just to
provide more services. With the IBCs, Grupo
Diavaz is now able to include all our capabili-
ties and we believe these new contracts will
mean higher productivity as they will create
a win-win situation between our customers
and the services that we provide, they induce
the contractor to produce more using better
technologies.”
Grupo Diavaz currently provides services
to PEMEX and other companies in marine
operations, gas distribution and exploration
and production. The company assists PEMEX
to produce gas in Burgos Basin in the North
Region, where it also helps PEMEX to pro-
duce oil, whereas in the Marine Region they
operate underwater pipelines.
One of the key strengths of Diavaz over
the years has been its ability to create and
strengthen firm partnerships with interna-
tional players, bringing new technologies to
the Mexican oil and gas industry. The latest
such partnership is with Fugro for deepwater
development and exploration. “Grupo Diavaz has been work-
ing with Fugro in the offshore market for over twenty years.
Thanks to this, we now provide services to deepwater fields.
Geotechnical and geophysical studies are the very first step
to develop them, now Grupo Diavaz is working on it”, says
Vázquez.
Protexa, a local EPC with activities in onshore and offshore
oil piping laying and oil drilling, besides maritime construc-
tions, also expects considerable benefits from the new IBCs.
“The new IBCs and other measures brought by the 2008 energy reform opened many busi-
ness opportunities that weren’t feasible before, such as alliances between PEMEX and other
companies to increase production, which will ultimately bring many multinational companies that
are still not based in Mexico. The newcomers will naturally search for synergies with local players
who can offer them local experience and market knowledge, making Protexa a unique partner of
choice”, says Fernando Lobo, head of Protexa.
This Mexican family-owned company is focusing on providing value to PEMEX’s requirements.
The company has built about 25% of the pipelines or submarine lines in Mexico and installed
CarDelt_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 11:39 AM
Ing. Oscar Vázquez Sentíes, CEO of Grupo Diavaz
FOCUS REPORTS20 February 201270 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
approximately 90% of the fixed offshore platforms in the country.
“As is well known, PEMEX plans to replenish its reserves by more
than 100% in the coming years, which represents a lot of work and
opportunities. To maintain a production of 2.5 million bbl/d means to
significantly increase drilling activities, among other things, and this
can give much impetus to Protexa’s offshore business”, anticipates
Lobo. His growth strategy is to promote new technologies and to enter
Mexico’s promising deepwater explorations. However, Protexa also
intends to continue promoting the maintenance of PEMEX’ platforms
and marine facilities, as this represents Protexa’s main cash flow.
Becoming betterAfter nearly three decades of operations, Oil International Services (OIS)
has built a skilled team with a deep understanding of both the Mexican
and the international oil industry and has gained a broad experience in
onshore and offshore construction, manufacturing and maintenance of
marine drilling rigs.
According to the company’s operational director Adrian Busta-
mante, OIS growth has always been linked to its clients’ needs and has
also succeeded in meeting national and international requirements:
“Our structure and capabilities give us the flexibility to offer our services
directly to PEMEX or to any international company by using incentive
contract schemes.”
OIS provides products and services using leading edge technolo-
gies. Bustamante asserts: “At OIS we are always looking for new ways
to help the oil and gas industry to improve its performance and to
achieve the best possible outcome.” Among these services OIS offers
two key solutions: providing Dynamic Equipment with safety and envi-
ronmental protection systems in order to address environmental and
safety issues respectively.
During the past five years, the oil and gas industry in Mexico has
experienced a steady decline in production. Nevertheless Bustamante
asserts that OIS has fulfilled its commitment in terms of production
in various niches such as drilling modules overhauling and providing
enclosures for gas turbines in the Mexican Oil Industry commissioning
between Singapore and Mexico.
In addition Bustamante feels confident about the future as he asserts
that the company has “a long term vision to anticipate the customers'
future needs; that is why within the group we have an area of research
and development which allows us to have a clear image of the techno-
logical trends and to help us understand the applications and solutions
to be implemented in PEMEX’s PEP development program.”
OIS partnership strategies have played a key role in the company’s
growth: “We have been working with foreign companies that are
already established in Mexico or with others that intend to penetrate
It is a company with 6 years of experience in the Project manage-
ment of the Energetic Sector, particularly in the Petroleum
Industry.
It takes part with companies as Mexican Oils, contributing in the
Planification, Organization, Direction and Project control in such
Strategic Areas as: Exploration, Explotation, Perforation,
Transport and Distribution of Hydrocarbons, Industrial
Security and Environmental Protection.
It designs and develops specialized software for the administra-
tion of integral projects, with base in the Reforms of PEMEX's
New Law, since:
CIAPP (System of Consultation of Information for the Administra-
tion of the Petroleum Processes). It is a technological platform,
which integrates and processes the information of the substantive
activities in the petroleum industry, allowing a better control during
his execution and an opportune capture of decisions.
SAFFC (Integral System of Administration of Contracts). It is a
technological tool which purpose is to facilitate a suitable adminis-
tration if the contracts of any nature.
It develops Basic and detailed
engieneering base on Electronic
threedimensional intelligent models
(METIS).
CarSAFFC_OGFJ_1202 1 1/23/12 1:28 PM
Lic. Eric Bustamante de la Parra, CEO, and Lic. Adrián Bustamante de la Parra, COO, OIS
FOCUS REPORTS 21February 2012 21www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 71
the market. At OIS we are open to forming partnerships as long as they
are in a win-win format for all parties involved. We have also established
in Mexico City, Ciudad del Carmen and Houston to fulfill our clients’
needs and concentrate on strategic alliances.
As for the long-term goals, Bustamante insists that OIS vision and
mission will remain: “to become a model group in its niche.” He also
adds that the company is committed to continue searching new and fur-
ther solutions to actively contribute to improve the Mexican oil industry.
Deepwater Cliff DiversOne must not underestimate the knowledge accumulated in a century
by Mexico’s oil and gas industry. When offshore exploration was only
a speck in the distance for countries such as Norway or Brazil in the
1960s, Mexico was already working its way to discovering the world’s
second largest mega field in its shallow waters. But sadly, easy come,
easy go.
After decades of easy oil and lack of market competition, the tech-
nologies available for the expansion of Mexico’s hydrocarbon industry
have lagged behind its international counterparts and failed to meet its
increased hard-to-find oil needs. Adrian Lajous, PEMEX general director
from 1994 to 1999, is categorical about Mexico’s current challenges
to expand into new oil frontiers, “The main potential for discoveries is
where we have not explored in the past, which is in deep and ultra-
deepwater in the Gulf of Mexico. This is more a recognition of our
ignorance than any specific knowledge of what may be discovered or
where.”
Two recent deepwater discoveries have shaken the Mexican oil and
gas industry, “Three years ago, PEMEX discovered important deepwa-
ter natural gas reserves at the Lakach field and, more recently, it has
found gas reserves in the Piklis field, which together form part of the
same sub-basin in the Gulf’s deepwaters”, highlights Carlos Morales,
PEMEX E&P general manager. Coincidently or not, these findings came
out in 2008, at the same timeas the approval of the energy reform bill
by Mexican legislators.
Bejamin Torres-Barron, partner at Baker & McKenzie explains
the impact of the 2008 energy reform in the deepwater sector and
beyond. “I believe the greatest achievement of our energy reform is,
on one side, the DAC (Disposiciones Administrativas de Contratación)
or the ‘Administrative Procurement
Guidelines’, which include more flex-
ible mechanisms and add particular
features to facilitate contracting with
private parties. It is a rather modern
contractual structure that is designed
to encourage private parties and our
national industry to ‘dive’ into deep-
waters. Maybe later than sooner (not
as early as we would like), but finally
Mexico will be able to exploit the
challenging deepwaters in the Gulf of
Mexico, whereas before, PEMEX was
unable to do so.”
He goes on to emphasize that
“The energy reform is not only
related to oil matters. The reform
package also contained specific
features related to renewable energy
and energy efficiency. Some progress has been made on this front,
particularly in the electricity sector. In terms of renewables, the power
industry has been more effective as a result of the policies and the
guidelines that the Mexican Energy Regulatory Commission has issued
and implemented to encourage the use and exploitation of electricity
based on renewable sources.”
With all nuances of the 2008 reform, Torres-Barron acknowledges
that the real interest and revenue for international oil companies will
be in the Gulf of Mexico’s deepwaters. However, what is important for
most IOCs is the ability to book reserves. At the moment, if an IOC
goes into a field for E&P, Mexico’s legal framework does not allow it to
book these reserves. Torres reckons that “This prohibition to booking
reserves is not clear enough and is subject to different arguments and
interpretations with respect to its scope and mandatory effect”. Not
very comforting for an already overly risky industry.
Jose Aguilar, director general of C&C Technologies Mexico,
describes some symptomatic signs of the lack of favorable regulatory
conditions for deepwater projects, “While C&C Technologies’ main
activity is deepwater, there have been no substantial developments in
Ing. José Aguilar, director general of C&C Technologies Mexico
Mr. Adrían Lajous Ex CEO of Pemex and specialist in the Oil&Gas industry
FOCUS REPORTS22 February 201272 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
Global Conquista?
With guaranteed rev-
enues from PEMEX
many Mexican private
companies are too often Mexico-centered
and few have invested to internationalize
their client base. Samuel Nicolayevsky and
Carlos Kahan, respectively president and
CEO of Xanik, pride themselves on being
one of them. “The excellence of our valves
has enabled us to considerably increase our
exports all over the world. Today we are
selling to the United States and Canada,
Venezuela, Colombia, Israel, South Africa,
Korea, Singapore, Kuwait, and Australia. In
Europe we sell to Belgium, the Netherlands,
Greece, Poland, Finland, Italy. Furthermore,
4 years ago we started to work in China;
our penetration in that market was mainly
in valves for alkylation process, and special
alloy and high pressure. Today our business
is 70 percent international and 30 percent
local, while a few years ago it was the other
way around”, they celebrate.
Xanik is UOP approved to supply valves
in all pipe classes for the HF alkylation
units. “This approval was a great milestone
for us since there were only three valves
companies approved in the world and we
were the fourth to get it. We are proud to
say that we are the only company in this
country that makes these types of valves”,
they say.
“It’s important to mention that even
though we have considerable exports,
one of our policy mantras at Xanik is that
whatever we can buy in Mexico, we buy it
here. Of course, there are certain types of
materials that are not produced in Mexico.
However, 80 percent of our acquisitions
are made in Mexico. Even when prices
are a little higher, we want to promote
Mexican workmanship and demonstrate
that Mexican products can have the best
quality standards”, they add.
CarLOC_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 1:23 PM
Ing. Samuel Nicolayevsky, president, and Lic.Carlos Kahan, CEO, XANIK
FOCUS REPORTS 23February 2012 23
CarXan_OGFJ_1202 1 1/23/12 1:26 PM
FOCUS REPORTS24 February 201274 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
this market in Mexico nor do I fore-
see any in the next five years. We
are currently participating in Lakach
field, the only deepwater activity in
Mexico, by providing engineering
services for various land facilities.
Having also done work for Lakach
five years ago, we at C&C Technolo-
gies are proud of our long service to
the only deepwater production site
in Mexico.”
C&C Technologies is still working at Mexico’s offshore and shal-
low water areas and also provides geotechnical services. According
to Aguilar, what explains C&C Technologies’ success in the Mexican
market is their “Ability to offer a number of services in one package.
C&C can offer a customer both onshore and offshore solutions. I want
C&C Technologies to be one vendor that is able to provide a whole set
of products. I also want to offer a company with the highest technology
with a 100 percent Mexican workforce.”
While offshore work is normally C&C Technologies’ cash cow, in
Mexico they earn similar revenues from their onshore work. Aguilar
concludes by saying the “We at C&C Technologies are benefitting from
volume instead of bulk. We are applying offshore technology to all land
technology, which can be simple but, nevertheless, it has never been
done before”.
Milton Costa, general director of Petrobras Mexico, couldn’t be
more diplomatic in his comments about PEMEX, Mexico and its latest
energy reform, “The energy reform was something very important.
However, time is going to prove whether changes made are going to
achieve what authorities want. Mexico is a fantastic country with a huge
economy and a large population. It is a big challenge to supply the
amount of energy that its industry and 110 million inhabitants demand.
Regarding Petrobras as a model, it is true that the company is a very
appealing model to exemplify how a state oil company can be man-
aged and grow very fast in a successful way.”
When asked if one can compare Petrobras to PEMEX, here is his
answer, “The point is that conditions are different. In Brazil we were
always looking for oil because we were not self-sufficient, while Mexico
had considerable amounts of easy-to-extract oil and gas. So the
approaches were really very different. When we discovered oil in Brazil,
it was in deepwater, which meant a big technical challenge for Petro-
bras. Facing and solving this challenge has shaped our business culture
and made Petrobras what it is today. We have a larger experience
and we can share it with PEMEX.” Being an experienced employee of
Petrobras, a NOC itself, Costa is well aware of the greater advantages
of joining forces with local NOCs rather than trying to compete directly
with them.
Local knowledge, local contentWhile addressing the subject of deepwater development and Mexico’s
needs, Adrian Lajous, former PEMEX general manager draws attention
to the huge knowledge gap facing Mexico: “Naturally, never having
to explore these areas has left a serious lack of know-how in the areas
where we actually have the potential to find new reserves”.
The challenges are not just in E&P, as PEMEX’s ambitious invest-
ment plan also targets downstream sectors. In the words of PEMEX’s
Milton Costa, general director of Petrobras Mexico
Señor del Mar, in the Gulf of Mexico. Photo courtesy of Pemex
Sonda de Campeche
FOCUS REPORTS 25February 2012 25www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal February 2012 energy.focusreports.net 75
current general manager, “Today we
produce 1.4 billion barrels in both oil
and gas liquids. Our development
costs are about $15 per barrel and
the refining cost reaches from $1.5
up to $2.5 per barrel. The other part
of our strategy is to turn around
the situation in downstream. In past
years petrochemicals and refining
activities were in deficit”, says Juan Josè Sùarez Coppel, general direc-
tor of PEMEX. Since PEMEX is willing to increase its current production
levels from 2.5 million bbl/d to 3 million bbl/d by 2018 and improve its
local refining capacity, the U$ 22-24 billion annual investments planned
for the coming years will surely run short.
Technological research centers such as Ciateq have spotted the
opportunities brought by such aggressive investment plays and are try-
ing to fill Mexico’s technology gap as soon as possible. Since 2001, the
research institute has shifted its attention to the growing technological
needs of Mexico’s oil and gas industry. “At first, the institution worked
with gas processing technologies, but now we are focusing on fluid flow
measurement, directly applied to oil and gas flows, and exploratory
and producing wells’ productivity”, highlights Francisco Antón, Ciateq’s
general director. Ciateq has continu-
ally worked with PEMEX’s subsidiar-
ies and over the years PEMEX Gas
has become its main client, while the
research institution also completed
projects for PEMEX Refining and
PEMEX Exploration & Production.
In order to meet PEMEX’s needs
for large natural gas flow measure-
ment installations, Ciateq has entered into partnerships with institutes
in the United States and Canada, such as Southwest Research Institute
and Transcanada, which complement its capabilities and enable Ciateq
to execute large projects for PEMEX. Naturally, being a public research
center facilitates Ciateq’s access to the equally public-owned PEMEX,
making it an interesting channel for introducing new technologies and
processes into Mexico’s oil and gas industry.
Nevertheless, to develop Mexican know-how and technologies,
companies will need a large pool of skilled workers available. According
to Alejandro Martin, country manager of London Offshore Consultants
(LOC), this will become a major challenge. Martin states that, “Mexico
will need thousands of skilled people to do the work its oil and gas
industry requires. There are thousands and unfilled qualified jobs at
Crossing the Rio Grande
While relatively few Mexi-
can companies operate
in the USA, many have
seized the opportunities created by the
proximity of their northern neighbors.
In early 2000 PEMEX decided to acceler-
ate the integration of new technologies
developed abroad. Many newly created
companies seized the opportunity to
develop partnership with US based technol-
ogy suppliers. Jorge de la Torre, a former
PEMEX field engineer, decided to embark
on such an adventure and founded Delta
ARE. Thanks to a partnership with Capillary
Services Inc. Delta ARE was a pioneer in
bringing capillary tubing to Mexico.
However the US didn't only supplied
Delta ARE with a strong technological
partner, de la Torre recalls that facing
adversity with obtaining credits directly in
Mexico, they had to cross the Rio Grande
a second time, incorporate a US company
and successfully convince US financial
institutions to give them the credit to
successfully develop their Mexican
operations.
Nowadays the company has been
contracted to collect and process
magnetotelluric data in one of Mexico’s
first shale gas projects, located between
Nuevo Laredo and Piedras Negras. They
could surely seek advice north of the
border where shale gas is nothing new.
Francisco Antón Gabelich, general director, CIATEQ
Ing. Alejandro Martín Audelo Aun General Manager, London Offshore Consultants (LOC) Mexico
FOCUS REPORTS26 February 201276 energy.focusreports.net February 2012 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com
industry.” Paredes now expects to
increase its service portfolio and, by
doing so, help PEMEX to reach its
local content targets.
Safety FirstThe Deepwater Horizon disaster
of April 20th 2010 in the Gulf of
Mexico, resulting in 11 deaths and
the estimated spillage of between
4 and 5 million barrels of oil, has brought the paramount importance
of high safety standards within the industry into sharp focus. The
toughening of local security and environmental regulations has already
changed the fate of companies such as Kidde de Mexico (a subsidiary
of UTC Fire and Security). With an impressive safety record “Kidde has a
record of more than five years with zero accidents on the work we have
performed”, says Horacio Fájer, Kidde de Mexico’s president.
“What is better for us in the long run is that we have been able to
demonstrate that Kidde can sustain the systems beyond 98 percent
availability. To have all fire systems beyond 98 percent is key to our main
customer, PEMEX. That is because we have been able to train, educate,
and report even a “near miss” – which is almost an accident or some-
thing that could eventually become an accident”, highlights Fájer.
As with most other Mexican service providers, the role of PEMEX
is central to Kidde’s present and future, “An important portion of
our recent growth in the offshore and marine business is due to our
expanded relationship with PEMEX. Kidde de Mexico now maintains
fire systems in turbo-machinery, open areas and habitation units. The
company is also committed to better train and develop the skills in the
overall fire protection industry in Mexico, and is planning to offer train-
ing and certification to the PEMEX’s crew in Spanish” explains Fájer.
Strangely, only a few other companies offer training with 100% Spanish
materials, which can pose a significant problem in sites with a high
proportion of local crew.
In addition to this, Mexican companies are quick to react to these
highest needs for safety services and procedure. Promasa, for example
developed an innovative safety system, called the “arnés inteligente”
(smart harness). As general director Francisco Soriano explains, “The
the moment and we cannot rely
on bringing people from abroad
because other countries will have
their own needs to solve, besides
the fact that bringing foreign per-
sonnel would be very expensive. As
a country, Mexico needs to make a
bigger effort to increase and train
people at all levels, so that it can
further succeed and enhance its oil
& gas industry”.
Present in Mexico since 2004, LOC Mexico provides Marine War-
ranty Survey (MWS) services in the country. It also provides specialized
marine consultancy and surveying services to the maritime industry. “In
2004 the Ku-Maloob-Zaap development was in its early stages. It was
perfect timing for us to open the Mexican office as this allowed us to
offer MWS services to PEMEX. Our participation in the review of the
NRF-041, which is the standard established by PEMEX for the load-out,
transportation and installation of marine platforms, is a good example
of our participation with PEMEX in improving the industry practice in
the country”, recalls Martin.
The issue of developing local expertise and increasing the local
content in the Mexican oil and gas industry has been taken as a priority
for PEMEX and for the Mexican government. Measures in this direction
have boosted the demand for local start-ups such as SAFFC. With only
five years of experience in the oil and gas industry, this service provider
has specialized in the negotiation, management and supervision of stra-
tegic projects in areas such as exploration and exploitation, perforation,
transport, hydrocarbon distribution, industrial safety and environmental
protection.
With a crew of over 400 contributors working in Cantarell, Samaria
Luna, Macuspana and Chicontepec, SAFFC’s CEO Juan Carlos Paredes
asserts that “The only reason why we have been able to capitalize on
PEMEX’s “going local” policy were our strong investments in high-
quality standards, which culminated on the ISO 9001:2008 certifica-
tion. This certification has been a major step in order to guarantee the
enterprise’s commitment to work according to its quality management
system and to fulfill all international quality standards required by the
Horacio Fájer Cardona, president of Kidde Mexico
Ing. Francisco Soriano, general director of Promasa
FOCUS REPORTS 27February 2012 27
CarOIS_OGFJ_1202 1 1/20/12 1:59 PM
idea was born after a conversation between
me and a PEMEX drilling manager. After he
told me that despite all the security measures
that they had, accidents were still happening,
I told him we needed a 24-hour supervisor.
We brainstormed how we could do this and it
occurred to us that instead of thinking about
only training people to warn others in case of
danger, we should come up with an electronic
device that could assist us in doing so 24/7.
Then we investigated the technologies that
were available and came up with a technology
that uses a type of wireless computer alarm
that gives a history and reports from the con-
trol area. This way, whenever a worker is in a
dangerous place at a dangerous time, he and
others are warned by the ‘arnés inteligente’.”
The company first started auditing air
systems in drill wells in 1999 and then saw the
opportunity to offer PEMEX’s subcontractors
risk studies and Rig Pass courses. “Regarding
industrial security and environment-related
courses, Promasa is accredited with more
than 30 different courses, being the company
with the second highest number of accredita-
tions behind the Houston-based International
Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC). Rig
Pass is a basic course necessary to enter any
PEMEX drilling installation”, says Soriano.
According to Soriano, a lot has changed
in Mexico on the environmental requirement
fields, “In the past, environmental audit ser-
vices were too costly and were unnecessarily
bureaucratic. Therefore, I saw a niche where
Promasa could offer efficient and competi-
tive services which ended up opening many
interesting opportunities for us”.
FOCUS REPORTS28 February 2012 FOCUS REPORTS
For exclusive interviews and directory of Mexican
companies, log on : www.energy.focusreports.net
FOCUS REPORTS 29February 2012 29FOCUS REPORTS16 www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal September 2011
OIL & GAS FINANCIAL JOURNAL: In 2009, you were appointed head of PEMEX, a company surrounded by many pressures and influences (politics, fiscal, trade unions). Was this somewhat like a poisonous gift?
DR. JUAN JOSÉ SUÁREZ COPPEL: I previously spent six years – from 2000 to 2006 – working for PEMEX. I therefore knew what I was getting into when I had the privilege of being asked to work in this posi-tion. I have worked in both the private and public sectors
and even if this job can be frustrating, it is the most interesting and rewarding job I have ever had.
OGFJ: What have been your priorities over the course of the past two years?
SUÁREZ COPPEL: When I arrived at PEMEX, we had experienced several years of steep decline in oil production. As such, the main priority was to make sure we were making the right investments and making the right decisions to stop this trend. We also pursued our exploration efforts in order to reach our target of a 100% replacement ratio by 2012. The other part of our strategy was to turn around the situation in downstream. In past years petrochemicals and refining activities were in deficit. Hence we made the decision to return to profits. Our last point was to operate operational changes in order to become a more flexible, efficient, and agile organization.
AN INTERVIEW WITH DR. JUAN JOSÉ SUÁREZ COPPEL
EDITOR’S NOTE: The following interview with Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel, director-general of Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX), was conducted in Mexico by the editorial staff of Focus Reports exclusively for Oil & Gas Financial Journal. Suárez Coppel, an economist, succeeded Jesus Reyes Her-oles as chief executive of the state-owned oil monopoly in September 2009. He previously served as CFO of PEMEX before leaving the company in 2006.
Suárez Coppel is building PEMEXdespite constitutional restrictions
PEMEX installation in Bay of CampechePhoto courtesy of PEMEX
FOCUS REPORTS30 February 2012September 2011 Oil & Gas Financial Journal • www.ogfj.com 17
OGFJ: What is the overall line and target for increasing E&P?
SUÁREZ COPPEL: PEMEX today produces 1.4 bil-lion barrels in both oil and gas liquids. Our development costs are about $15 per barrel and the refining cost is $1.5 to $2.5 per barrel. We need to invest between $15 to $18 per barrel to maintain these levels of production. Therefore, we need to invest $22 to 24 billion every year to maintain our level of production.
When it comes to crude, we produce close to 2.6 mil-lion barrels per day, and I believe that by the end of this year, we will be producing steadily 2.6 million. Our plan is to reach 2.7 million bpd by the end of 2012 and hit 3 million bpd by 2017-2018. This will of course require significant invest-ments, and we therefore need to invest in addition to these $22 to $24 billion planned. Besides we have a lot of opportunities to increase our gas output. In the past, a lack of invest-ment drove to the decline in non-associated gas pro-duction in the Veracruz and Burgos basins. But today we have discovered very significant gas fields in deep water. We expect produc-tion to start by 2015.
I believe we also have opportunities in our shale gas potential. We are optimistic about all these developments, and we will continue making efforts to increase gas production as Mexico needs this gas.
This is the basis of our development strategy. As every company involved in extraction we need to think about the future now. This is why we are choosing to invest heavily in E&P.
OGFJ: PEMEX introduced incentive contracts. What has been the reaction to these contracts and what novelty do they bring?
SUÁREZ COPPEL: Our constitution does not allow us to enter into joint ventures. PEMEX was working on penalty bases without incentives. And that now this has changed. In 2008, within the frame of the energy reforms, we got more flexibility in contracting. This flex-
ibility allows us to contract private operators for our oil and gas fields.
The incentive contracts have two main components: the first is a “cost recovery” factor while the second is a “pay per barrel” factor. These two elements have differ-ent effects on incentives and it is important to keep both, and play around with them.
Unfortunately, we still suffer from a lack of competi-tiveness regarding fiscal terms. Given that we have been trying to have these contracts as close to non-recourse as we possibly can, this often creates a situation in which the cash-flows make the recovering of these contracts very tough.
Having said that, deep-water will happen. We started investing consider-ably in deepwater explora-tion in 2004, and back then, we acknowledged this wasn’t going to happen overnight. But I am glad to say that we are now going to start developing our first deepwater field – Lakach – and we are confident production will begin in 2015. We are very excited about Mexico’s deepwater potential.
OGFJ: The investment plan announced by PEMEX mainly focuses on E&P. Are you neglect-ing the refining and petrochemical infrastruc-tures?
SUÁREZ COPPEL: Everything else might look dwarfed but this is a wrong perception. We are invest-ing what we need in refineries, putting very important investments in the next few years. We are building new processing capacities in Minatitlán refinery, and we are revamping Tula. In general, we are putting a lot of money into maintenance and bringing up to speed up our overall refining system. Furthermore, we are putting
“We started investing considerably in deepwater exploration in 2004, and back then we acknowl-edged this wasn’t going to happen overnight. But I am glad to say that we are now going to start developing our first deepwater field – Lakach – and we are confident production will begin in 2015.”— Juan José Suárez Coppel
FOCUS REPORTS 31February 2012 3118 www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal September 2011
more money into petrochemicals, as there are a lot of opportunities. North America has the cheapest natural gas, and we absolutely need to take advantage of this situation.
OGFJ: Despite the turnaround in oil output decline last year, PEMEX once again generated losses. How do you explain this situation?
SUÁREZ COPPEL: This is more a result of both our fiscal and social obligations than of our operations. PEMEX is responsible for the payment of LPG subsidies – close to $7 billion per year. The prices that we receive for the products we sell in Mexico (gasoline, diesel, and other) are calculated with the logic of international prices plus logistics to protect Mexican consumers from our monopoly. That logistical adjustment has to be approved by our tax collector. This costs us another $5 billion to $6 billion every year.
In addition, one third of our payroll goes to pensioners – that is to say all the people that have worked with us throughout history, which amounts to 70,000 people, and which cost us another $3 billion to $4 billion annually. This represents more of a debt than an operating cost. These cost caps, which we cannot deduct from our taxes, make us pay about $6 billion more than what we would pay with a regional tax scheme.
If you add all these elements together, of course losses will be big. For instance, last year we lost about $4.5 billion. But if you add all this up, with the adjusted P&L, we actually made about $15 billion. We pay a lot of dividends to our shareholders – a good $18 billion of dividends on top of the taxes we pay.
Having said that, certainly there are a lot of opportu-nities to increase our profitability and that is what we see as one of our main responsibilities – getting profitability downstream and ensuring profitability and cost-reduction across the board.
From my viewpoint, too many people have a say in how PEMEX is run. When there are too many cooks in the kitchen, no one is responsible for how the broth tastes. The big difference from how we run PEMEX and how other NOCs and oil companies are run is that in the latter, you have one cook. You then have to make sure he has the ingredients that he claims he needs, and then
if the broth is not good enough, after a couple of trials, you get a new cook.
Most certainly we need to run PEMEX more as a business entity, as an enterprise, so we can get better results out of the company. Rather than focusing on how to get more taxes from the company, we should concen-trate on ensuring that PEMEX has the financial, techni-cal, and human resources to increase Mexico’s potential as an oil and gas producer and exporter.
We need to be able to run the company as a com-pany. We do not need a new company; we just need the flexibility to run this company as we should in order to create value for our shareholders.
OGFJ: How do you see the future of PEMEX, and what is the model for the company?
SUÁREZ COPPEL: On the one hand, you have Bra-zil’s Petrobras and Norway’s Statoil where the majority
of the shares and control over the votes are owned by the government, but they still act as private com-panies. Generally speaking, the way a company is run should not be affected by who the owner is. One would like the people run-ning the company to create value for shareholders independently of whether they are governments, sovereign wealth funds, or regular individuals. So yes, on the one hand, PEMEX should be like a Petrobras, a big company with the government as the majority shareholder, but a company
able to compete with others. Another example is Saudi Aramco, in which the
company and the resource are owned by the same entity. The company does its job by maximizing the value of the resource and you do not need special regulatory bodies. At PEMEX there are just too many regulators. There has to be a decision about whether we wish to come closer to the models of Saudi Arabia or Brazil. But that is a politi-cal decision. Meanwhile, our job is to run PEMEX as well as we possibly can.
The issue right now is that we have a huge oppor-tunity to increase the value that we can get from the industry by just running PEMEX properly. Regardless of politics, we need to strengthen, develop, and invest in our company.
OGFJ: Thank you very much for your time. OGFJ
PEMEX petrochemical complexPhoto courtesy of PEMEX
FOCUS REPORTS32 February 201220 www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal September 2011
EDITOR’S NOTE: Carlos Morales Gil is head of exploration and production at PEMEX. This interview was conducted by Focus Reports exclusively for Oil & Gas Financial Journal.
AN INTERVIEW WITH PEMEX’S CARLOS MORALES GIL
OIL & GAS FINANCIAL JOURNAL: In May PEMEX announced a new deepwater natural gas discovery. How important is this discovery for the company? Could this be the beginning of a new era for PEMEX, signaling a shift from petroleum to natural gas and the true start of deepwater exploration and production for Mexico?
CARLOS MORALES GIL: This is a very important dis-covery for two main reasons. First, it confirms the existence of a gas province in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico with significant production potential. Two years ago we discovered Lakach, and now Piklis, which together form part of the same sub-basin in the Gulf’s deep waters.
Second, the discovery also means that PEMEX has entered into a challenging area of deepwater operations. At 1,900 meters (6,000 feet) this is the deepest well that we have drilled. It leads us to work in a way that we foresaw several years ago when first projecting deepwater activities. As we developed our capacities, we started shooting seismic, commenced drilling, and prepared our people to take on this challenge. We are now ready for development. Our first asset to be developed in deep waters is Lakach which, together with Piklis, has the potential to produce about 800 bcf, which equates to 80% of the country’s current gas imports. This is very significant.
Additionally, we are working to include new capacities in our drilling fleet. We will have three rigs in deep waters this year, which we contracted in 2007. We have an assessment of about 28 billion barrels of oil equivalent of prospective resources, and we are going to speed up the exploration process in deep waters to hopefully deliver expected results.
OGFJ: You recently returned from the United States, Canada, and Argentina where you launched new incen-tive contracts. Why did you choose these countries and what was your message to investors there?
CMG: Our E&P strategy is focused on reducing current production gaps – increasing production in order to replace the reserves that we are extracting. Part of this strategy includes the reactivation of mature fields. After discovering the Mesozoic basins in the south and the Gulf of Campeche in the early 1970s, we essentially abandoned mature fields without enough activity to extract the reserves that were
still in place. We have only extracted 17% of their volume, so there is still great potential in those fields. We have the potential to extract at least twice as much. Increasing the production capacity of mature fields is one of our objectives for the short term.
This means that we need to bring additional capacities to the country to complement the capacities that PEMEX currently has. Most of our human and financial resources are concentrated in our highly productive large fields in the south and the Gulf of Campeche. We need to look at additional capacity for those mature fields which is why we are trying to bring in people through new contracts. The bidding has been going on for a little over two months and so far we have had very good responses from the interested parties. We have 45 bases and 22 companies for sale, and overall we believe we have very strong offers on the table that are attractive to the industry.
OGFJ: Last year PEMEX announced a massive $267 billion plan to increase output. Can you explain to our readers how important this plan is for PEMEX and how the money will be divided? Will it be dedicated more to enhancing existing fields or new exploration efforts?
CMG: The key word that best describes our strategy is diversification. We are increasing our level of investment in exploration. About 14% of our $22 billion annual budget is dedicated to exploration activity.
A big part of the budget, of course, goes to develop-ment and production in the high productivity areas in the southwest and offshore shallow waters – 8% is dedicated to Chicontepec because we see it as a strategic resource. The remaining 78% to 80% goes to the big production areas – the development of onshore fields in the south and the new fields that we discovered in the last two years. Part of the budget also goes toward Burgos as part of PEMEX’s gas strategy. The multiple areas of investment indeed reflect our strategy to diversify.
OGFJ: Over the past 30 years, the Cantarell field alone has generated over half a trillion dollars in revenue since it began production in 1979. The Chicontepec field, which was deemed the possible successor of Cantarell, has proven to be far more challenging due to geologi-cal aspects. As a result, not only have production results been far below expectations, but more worryingly, production costs have now doubled and are on par with bitumen oil sands in Canada at $17/barrel. Obviously this is far from being enough to replace Cantarell or
PEMEX’s head of E&P has planfor increasing production capacity
FOCUS REPORTS 33February 2012 3322 www.ogfj.com • Oil & Gas Financial Journal September 2011
CMG: Our production goal this year is 2,570,000 barrels per day, which is similar to last year’s output. We face some internal challenges, all of which we expect to overcome. Next year we expect production to surpass 2.6 million bar-rels per day.
OGFJ: Regarding these internal challenges, there have been efforts in the past to make the company more efficient and transparent. As a state-owned company, PEMEX is often the target of much criticism. I under-stand that PEMEX has a very special position in Mexico, but do you think it is time for the company to become more independent?
CMG: No doubt about it. Greater independence is one of our aims. We should let PEMEX be a more independent company and give it a more flexible legal framework without so many restrictions so it can perform better. PEMEX is often a target for criticism by politicians and by the public, who want to achieve a better standard of living for the Mexi-
can people. PEMEX is huge company which makes a lot of money and develops large-scale projects. This is in sharp contrast to the poverty we have in some areas, which makes the com-pany a convenient target of criticism. I applaud the initiatives of the president (of Mexico) to make PEMEX more flexible and grant it more budgetary independence. In the end the recipe is to leave PEMEX out of the political arena.
OGFJ: Mexico could use the expertise of foreign companies for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and in developing deepwater fields, yet there are certain governmental restric-tions. What is your message to those compa-
nies? Will you welcome them?
CMG: We have been working with service companies for a long time: consulting companies, universities – foreign as well as Mexican universities – and research institutes. The limitations that we have here in Mexico are related to prop-erty, which is not negotiable as it is in many other countries.
We need new technology to perform better and enhance reservoir recovery. For instance, we are working with a con-sortium of universities in the US and France to implement EOR projects in Mexico. Consulting companies are helping us define exploration strategies and the effectiveness of cur-rent prospects. We are now going a step beyond by having service contracts with operating companies in mature fields. But here in Mexico, just like everywhere else, the owner of the resource has to receive the rights and the royalties that the operating companies, including PEMEX, have to pay.
OGFJ: Thanks very much for your time. OGFJ
KMZ. Is there still hope that Chicontepec will play a central role future production?
CMG: I do indeed believe that Chicontepec will play a big strategic role in the future of the Mexican oil industry. Given the fact that there are about 100 billion barrels of oil equivalent down there in the ground, we cannot just let the field pass undeveloped like we did for the first 80 years since its discovery in 1926. We have the obligation to the country to develop the field. Everybody in the country, particularly those involved in developing policies, should be very inter-ested in Chicontepec. It is a strategic issue and a resource that we have not dedicated enough human and financial capacities to properly develop and extract. This is not the same as exploration. The difference between exploration and Chicontepec is that with exploration we are still searching for oil. In this case, we know where the oil is but we have to find better ways to extract it.
OGFJ: Chicontepec production for 2011 is forecast at 70,000 barrels per day. Can you confirm that figure and what do you hope to produce from Chicontepec in the coming years?
CMG: Our target forecast is to reach 70,000 bpd this December. Chicontepec currently represents 2% of our total oil output, and we
expect production to increase. Over the next two years, we expect Chicontepec to account for 4% of production, and 8% to 10% of production within five years.
Chicontepec is not like Cantarell, which is a mistake that people commonly make. It is bigger than Cantarell. But it is also tougher than Cantarell, so we have to bear in mind that it needs a different pace for execution, technological development, and reservoir management.
OGFJ: Since peaking in 2004, Mexico’s oil produc-tion has steadily declined. Production in 2009 was 25% lower than 2004 levels. By some assessments the life of estimated oil reserves is only nine more years. Neverthe-less April and May of this year have shown positive signs with one new oil discovery and an important deepwater gas find. What is the E&P outlook for 2011 and how hopeful you are that this will be another good year for PEMEX?
“The key word that best describes our strategy is diversification. We are increasing our level of investment in exploration. About 14% of our $22 billion annual budget is dedicated to exploration activity.” — Carlos Morales Gil
FOCUS REPORTS34 February 2012
PAST REPORTS
Part 1 August 2011
Part 2 December 2011
Part 1 July 2011
Part 2 November 2011
FOCUS REPORTS 35February 2012 35
FOCUS REPORTS36 February 2012
email: [email protected]