Top Banner
Methodology for Assessing Quality Infrastructure for Renewable Energy Technologies in Developing Countries George Kelly – Sunset Technology Inc. 2 Oct 2014
37

Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Jan 11, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Methodology  for  Assessing  Quality  Infrastructure  

 for  Renewable  Energy  Technologies    in  Developing  Countries  

   

George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology  Inc.    2  Oct  2014  

 

Page 2: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Project  #120350  

•  Seeking  to  priori5ze  ac5vi5es  for  support  of  RE  technology  adop5on  in  developing  countries  

•  Desire  to  develop  standardized  methodology  for  evalua5ng  op5ons  and  selec5ng  most  effec5ve  methods  of  support  

•  Based  on  input  from  interna5onal  experts  on  RE  technology  (IEC  Technical  CommiKees)  

Page 3: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Elements  of  REQI  

Page 4: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

4-­‐step  process  

•  Basic  concept  is  logical  and  straighPorward  

•  Concentrates  on  asking  the  correct  ques5ons    

•  Links  responses  to  the  most  appropriate  ac5ons  based  on  Market  Stage  and  exis5ng  REQI  elements  

Page 5: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Step  1:  Basic  QuesJons  Four  ques)ons  on  market  demand,  financing  policy,  standardiza5on  and  manufacturing  capacity  

allowing  for  a  basic  categoriza5on  of  the  RE  market  stage  in  a  given  country  

Step  2:  Market  Stage  The  market  stage  (introduc)on,  growth,  consolida)on,  maturity)  is  determined  on  the  basis  of  the  

responses  to  the  Basic  Ques5ons    

Step  3:  Specific  QuesJons  On  the  basis  of  the  market  stage  iden5fied,  a  further  detailed  set  of  ques)ons  needs  to  be  answered  

to  assist  with  determining  the  most  appropriate  course  of  ac)on  in  a  given  country    Eventually  based  on  an  available  list  of  standard  profiles  

Step  4:  Tailored  RecommendaJons  Depending  on  the  responses  to  the  Specific  Ques5ons,  the  market  stage  can  be  further  refined  and  a  

set  of  priori)zed  ac)ons  for  improving  QI    for  a  given  country  iden5fied.    

Performance  m

onitoring  for  every  stage  

Page 6: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Step  1  –  Basic  Ques5ons  

•  Must  correlate  to  market  stage  descrip5ons  (introduc5on,  growth,  consolida5on,  mature)  –  Iden5fying  characteris5cs  at  each  stage    – Based  on  key  situa5onal  components  (KSCs)  which  are  the  most  indica5ve  of  market  stage  

– Not  necessarily  about  QI;  more  about  ability  for  market  to  develop  

Page 7: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Key  Situa5onal  Components  (the  Four  Ques5ons)  

•  KSCs  are  iden5fied  as:  – Market  demand  – Policy  for  financing  of  RE  – Standards  &  conformity  assessment  – Exis5ng  manufacturing  capacity  

•  Need  to  provide  further  guidance  for  the  na5onal  expert  on  how  to  properly  analyze  the  responses  to  select  the  correct  market  stage  

Page 8: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Key  Situa5onal  Component   Introduc5on   Growth   Consolida5on   Maturity  Market  demand   There  is  an  ini5al  

consumer  demand  (early  movers)  for  RETs  

There  is  a  growing  consumer    demand  for  RETs  ;  consumers  recognize  value  of  RE  

There  is  a  steady  growth  of  RET  deployment;  consumers  recognize  value  of  RE;  consumers  recognize  value  of  QI  

Significant  value  is  perceived  for  RE;  high  quality  is  demanded;  benefits  of  QI  are  understood    

Policy  for  financing  of  RE  

There  is  no  policy  in  place,  or  minimal  funding  available  

Some  public  funding  is  available;  minimal  private  financing  is  available  

Increasing  public  and  private  funding  are  available;  some  consumer  financing  is  available  

Significant  public  and  private  funding  are  available;  consumer  financing  is  readily  available  

Standards  &  conformity  assessment    

There  are  no  relevant  standards  adopted;  there  is  no  conformity  assessment    

Relevant  standards  are  adopted;  conformity  based  on  importer  cer5fica5ons  

Relevant  standards  encouraging  quality  improvements  are  adopted;  par5cipa5on  in  standards  development;  limited  par5cipa5on  in  IECRE  

Extensive  standards  encouraging  quality  improvements  are  adopted;  par5cipa5on  in  standards  development;  full  par5cipa5on  in  IECRE  

Manufacturing  capacity  

There  is  no  manufacturing  capacity  in  place  

There  is  limited  local  manufacturing  capacity;  there  is  minimal  capability  for  quality  management  

There  is  local  manufacturing  capacity;  there  is  improving  capability  for  quality  management  

There  is  significant  local  manufacturing  capacity;  there  is  established  capability  for  quality  management  

Score:   1   2   3   4  

Page 9: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Step  2-­‐  Market  Stage  Market  Stage   IntroducJon   Growth   ConsolidaJon   Maturity  

Minimum  Score   1.0   2.5   3.0   3.5  

Maximum  Score   2.4   2.9   3.4   4.0  

•  Weigh5ng  Factors  are  assigned  based  on  market  stage  determined  in  this  step  

•  These  factors  are  used  to  priori5ze  recommended  ac5ons  in  step  4  

Page 10: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Market  Stage  Ra5ngs  (based  on  average  score)  

1.0  

1.5  

2.0  

2.5  

3.0  

3.5  

4.0  

1   65   129   193  

4  QuesJon  Scoring  

IntroducJon  

Growth  

ConsolidaJon  

Maturity  

Distribu5on  is  expected  to  be  skewed  to  early  market  stages  

Page 11: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Market  introducJon  

Step  3:  Specific  quesJons  

1.  Ques5on  A  2.  Ques5on  B  3.  Ques5on  C  4.  Ques5on  D  5.  Ques5on  E  

6.  Etc.    

Step  4:  Tailored  recommendaJons  

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    Profile  1*  

Profile  2  

Profile  3  

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

Market  growth  

1.  Ques5on  A  2.  Ques5on  B  3.  Ques5on  C  4.  Ques5on  D  5.  Ques5on  E  

6.  Etc.    

Profile  1  

Profile  2  1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

*The  number  of  specific  ques5ons  and  profiles  is  to  be  determined.  The  number  used  here  serves  as  an  example  only.  

Standard  profiles  could  be  developed  over  5me  

Page 12: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Market  maturity  

Step  3:  Specific  quesJons  

1.  Ques5on  A  2.  Ques5on  B  3.  Ques5on  C  4.  Ques5on  D  5.  Ques5on  E  

6.  Etc.    

Step  4:  Tailored  recommendaJons  

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    Profile  1  

Profile  2  

Profile  3  

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    Profile  4  

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

Market  consolidaJon  

1.  Ques5on  A  2.  Ques5on  B  3.  Ques5on  C  4.  Ques5on  D  5.  Ques5on  E  

6.  Etc.    

Profile  1*  

Profile  2   1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

1.  Recommenda5on  Priority  1  2.  Recommenda5on  Priority  2  

3.  Etc.    

Standard  profiles  could  be  developed  over  5me  

Page 13: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Step  3  –  Specific  ques5ons  

•  Different  from  basic  ques5ons  – Responses  are  indica5ve  of  QI  development    

•  Characteriza5on  of  REQI  Elements  to  iden5fy  subdivisions  of  specific  needs  within  market  stages  – Most  markets  are  expected  to  be  in  “introduc5on”  or  “growth”  stages  

– Must  guide  recommenda5ons  to  specific  needs  of  the  individual  country  

– Must  be  indica5ve  of  which  course  of  ac5on  will  be  most  effec5ve  

Page 14: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Situa5onal  Needs  Profile  REQI  Elements   Introduc5on   Growth   Consolida5on   Maturity  Market economics

Regulatory policy

Information on international standards

Participation in standards development

Adoption of standards Responses to Further set of specific questions

Conformity assessment process

Management of the certification system

Laboratory and testing capabilities

Installation, operation and maintenance

•  Specific  ques5ons  used  in  step  3  will  be  selected/edited  from  the  list  in  Annex  D  •  May  be  same  ques5ons  or  different  ques5ons  for  each  market  stage  •  Responses  may  not  be  sufficiently  similar  to  jus5fy  “standard”  profiles  as  

envisioned  in  previous  discussions  

Page 15: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Step  4  –  Tailored  recommenda5ons  

•  Each  country  case  will  result  in  a  set  of  priori5es  and  recommended  ac5ons  – REQI  needed  at  each  market  stage  is  defined  based  on  IRENA  references  

– Answers  gathered  in  Step  3  are  used  to  iden5fy  REQI  gaps  based  on  KSCs  in  subject  country  

– Ac5ons  are  priori5zed  based  on  expected  results,  5me  horizon,  and  available  budget  

Page 16: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

General  Categories  of  Ac5ons  (refined  with  IRENA  model)  

•  Policy  –  Incen5ves  – Standards  – Licensing  

•  Standards  process  – Educa5on  – Par5cipa5on  

•  Manufacturing  support  – QC  equipment  – Training  

•  Technical  capability  – Lab  – Field    

Page 17: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

IRENA  Model  

Page 18: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Guidance  for  Recommended  Ac5ons  (p.1)  Broad  areas  of  ac5vity  

Key capacity building needs

Introduc5on   Growth   Consolida5on   Maturity  

Economic  Support   support  QI   support  QI/Market  

support  QI/Market  

bolster  interna5onal  QI  

Financial support for product and market development

require  cer5fied  imports  

mfr  incen5ves   end  user  incen5ves  requiring  QI  

link  w/intl  groups  devloping  QI  

Performance  Assurance  

support  demo  projects  

ini5ate  tes5ng   begin  product  valida5on  

lower  govt  support  

Management of the certification system

build  public  awareness  

local  labs  emula5ng  intl  stds  

eqpt  &  system  ra5ngs/lis5ng  

reduce  incen5ves  

Communication of policy and incentives for RE technology adoption

user  training   IEC  tests  w/consumer  labels  

reduce  local  QI  support  

(  Easier  to  read  in  Excel  sheet  !!  )  

Page 19: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Guidance  for  Recommended  Ac5ons  (p.2)  Broad  areas  of  ac5vity  

Key capacity building needs

Introduc5on   Growth   Consolida5on   Maturity  

Standards  Process       support  con5nued  standards  making  

support  QI  

Utilization of international standards

adopt  in’tl  stds  as  natl  stds  

natl  &  intl   natl  stds  maintenance  

standards  maintenance  

Participation in standards development process

    regional/intl  stds  par5cipa5on  

interna5onal  standards  par5cipa5on  

Training   fund  training   support  training   require  accredita5on  

   

Access to information on standards and conformity assessment systems

       

Installation, operation and maintenance of RE systems

courses  for  prac55oners  

cer5fied  prac55oners  

training,  inspec5on      

Development of national capacity to implement relevant standards (trainers, consultants, energy experts, assessors, auditors)

courses  for  import  inspectors  

   

Page 20: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Guidance  for  Recommended  Ac5ons  (p.3)  Broad  areas  of  ac5vity  

Key capacity building needs Introduc5on   Growth   Consolida5on   Maturity  

Test  Capability   develop  regional  QI  scheme  

support  unaccredited  test  labs  

require  accredita5on  

Laboratory and testing capabilities

colloborate  w/other  countries  

regional  QI  development  

approach  intl  stds   test  labs,  cer5fica5on,    

Technical capacity for future standard development and performance monitoring

       

Development of national conformity assessment providers with mutual recognition within accepted international guidelines

               

Page 21: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Priori5za5on  of  Ac5ons  

Three  Decision  Criteria:  •  Most  likely  to  achieve  improvement  •  Reasonably  short  5me  horizon  •  Consistent  with  available  budget  

– Es5mated  cost  ranges  must  be  assigned  to  each  type  of  ac5on  

 

Page 22: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Market  Stage  Weigh5ng  Factors  

•  Based  on  Market  Stage  determined  in  step  2  •  Not  sure  if  further  subdivision  is  (1)  more  effec5ve  or  (2)  too  complex  

    Market  Stage  Weigh5ng  Factor  (MSWF)  

Broad  areas  of  ac5vity   Introduc5on   Growth   Consolida5on   Maturity  

Economic  Support   3 2 2 1

Performance  Assurance   2 3 3 2

Standards  Process  3 3 2 1

Training   2 3 2 1

Test  Capability  1 2 3 3

Page 23: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Market  Stage  Weigh5ng  Factors       Market  Stage  Weigh5ng  Factor  (MSWF)  Key capacity building needs Introduc5on   Growth   Consolida5on   Maturity  Financial support for product and market development 3 2 2 1 Management of the certification system 2 3 3 2 Communication of policy and incentives for RE technology adoption 3 2 2 1

Utilization of international standards 2 3 3 2

Participation in standards development process 2 3 2 1

Access to information on standards and conformity assessment systems 3 2 1 1

Installation, operation and maintenance of RE systems 2 3 2 1

Development of national capacity to implement relevant standards (trainers, consultants, energy experts, assessors, auditors)

2 3 2 1

Laboratory and testing capabilities 1 2 3 3

Technical capacity for future standard development and performance monitoring 1 2 2 3

Development of national conformity assessment providers with mutual recognition within accepted international guidelines

1 3 2 2

•  Based  on  Market  Stage  determined  in  step  2  •  Not  sure  if  further  subdivision  is  (1)  more  effec5ve  or  (2)  too  complex  

Page 24: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Conclusions  •  UNIDO  is  well  posi5oned  to  provide  capacity-­‐building  services  

relevant  to  REQI    –  In  earlier  work,  UNIDO  and  IRENA  have  made  significant  progress  in  

developing  a  methodology  for  evalua5on  of  REQI  in  developing  countries    

•  The  concept  of  market  development  through  a  four-­‐stage  hierarchy  is  a  useful  model  for  understanding  the  most  important  requirements  for  effec5vely  improving  REQI    –  By  gaining  an  understanding  of  situa5onal  components,  it  is  possible  

to  select  the  most  cost-­‐effec5ve  and  beneficial  ac5ons  that  will  improve  QI    

•  The  methodology  can  be  further  op5mized  to  guide  the  selec5on  of  the  best  ac5ons  to  improve  REQI  and  achieve  public  policy  objec5ves    

Page 25: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

PART  2  

•  If  sufficient  5me  is  available  for  further  discussion  

•  Possible  u5liza5on  of  conformity  assessment  with  new  IEC  System  for  Cer5fica5on  to  Standards  Rela5ng  to  Equipment  for  Use  in  Renewable  Energy  Applica5ons  (IECRE  System)  

®

Page 26: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

IECRE  System  •  Indica5on  of  a  need  for  interna5onal  conformity  assessment  system  for  RE  

•  Originally  conceived  for  large  projects  •  Could  define  scheme  for  small  RE  tech  in  developing  countries  

®

Page 27: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Conformity  Assessment  

•  Evalua5on  against  interna5onal  standards  – May  use  na5onal  or  regional  standards  if  no  interna5onal  standard  is  available  

•  Improved  quality  and  performance  –  Assurance  that  PV  plant  will  operate  as  designed  for  its  expected  life5me  

•  Increased  confidence  for  investors  –  Financial  return  meets  expecta5ons  –  Risk  is  reduced  

10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   27  

®

Page 28: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

IEC  Roles  &  Responsibili5es  

•  Standards  Management  Board  (SMB)  –  Technical  CommiKees  =>  Write  the  standards  – Manage  nomina5on  of  experts  and  vo5ng  by  Na5onal  CommiKees  

•  Conformity  Assessment  Board  (CAB)  –  Assessment  Schemes  =>  Evaluate  implementa5on  of  standards  in  specific  situa5ons  

– Manage  accredita5on  of  Cer5fying  Bodies  

®

10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   28  

Page 29: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

IEC  Organiza5on  IEC  Central  Office  

ExecuJve  CommiTee  

IECRE  

Standardiza5on  Management  Board  

(SMB)  

Conformity  Assessment  Board  

(CAB)  

Technical  CommiKees  (like  TC82)  

Technical  Advisory  CommiKees  

Strategic  Groups  

CAB  Working  Groups  

IECEE  

IECEx  

IECQ  

®

10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   29  

Page 30: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

!10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   30  

Page 31: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

IECRE Structure  

IEC  CONFORMITY  ASSESSMENT  BOARD,  CAB  Oversees  IEC  Conformity  Assessment  policy  and  Systems,  eg  IECEE,  IECEx,  IECQ,  IECRE  

 IECRE  Management  CommiKee,  REMC  Overall  management  of  the  IECRE  System  

 

Officers  +  Execu5ve,  Scheme  Chairs,  IEC  Gen.  Sec      

Expert  Working  Groups  (WGs)  –  as  needed  

WE  OMC  Wind  Energy  Opera5onal  Management  CommiKee  

 

Na5onal  Members    TC  88  +  SC  Liaison    

ME  OMC  Marine  Energy  Opera5onal  Management  CommiKee  

 

Na5onal  Members  

SubCommiKees  +  WGs  

IECRE  Secretariat              

Technical  Support  Administra5on  

PV  OMC  PV  Solar  Opera5onal    Management  CommiKee      

Daily management of WE Scheme

SubCommiKees  +WGs    

Daily management of ME Scheme

TC  114  +  SC  Liaison    

Daily management of PV Scheme

 

Na5onal  Members  

SubCommiKees  +  WGs  TC  82  +  SC  Liaison    

 

Na5onal  Members  (Countries)    

Page 32: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   32  

Page 33: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Aspects  of  Cer5fica5on  

•  Design  Phase  •  General    •  Site  condi5ons  evalua5on  •  Design  evalua5on  •  Equipment  evalua5on    •  Structural  and  electrical  

evalua5on  

•  Implementa5on  Phase  

•  Installa5on  surveillance  •  Output  characteris5cs  

measurement  •  Commissioning  surveillance  •  Opera5on  and  

maintenance  surveillance  

10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   33  

•  Conformity  assessment  will  be  performed  and  cer5ficate  issued  for  an  individual  PV  power  plant  on  a  specific  site    

Page 34: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

PV  Standards  for  Assessment  

 Module  -­‐  61215  /  61730  Inverter  -­‐  62109  /  62891  BOS  -­‐  62093  +  others      Manufacturing  Quality                    –  82/800/NP      System  Design  -­‐  62548  /  62738  Installa5on  –  local  codes  Commissioning  -­‐  62446  /  61829  Opera5on  –  61724  +  TBD  Maintenance  –  NWIP      10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   34  

Page 35: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Interna5onal  Electrotechnical  Commission  Technical  CommiKee  82  -­‐  Solar  photovoltaic  energy  systems  

 IEC  System  for  Cer5fica5on  to  Standards  Rela5ng  to  Equipment    

for  Use  in  Renewable  Energy  Applica5ons  (IECRE  System)  

®

Thank you for your attention

Questions?

Contact [email protected] 10  June  2014   George  Kelly  –  Sunset  Technology   35  

Page 36: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Extra  Slides  

Page 37: Methodology*for*Assessing* Quality*Infrastructure* *for ...

Market  Stage  Ra5ngs  (based  on  average  score)  

IntroducJon