Messinger Development: Definition & methods of study.

Messinger

Development:Definition & methods of study

Messinger

Overview

Defining development Studying development

– Longitudinal & cross-sectional designs Study design

– Experimental, observational, and qualitative studies

Predicted variables– typically behavior and/or physiologic activity

Messinger

Development defined

Individual change that is, normative, non-reversible, relatively stable, and sequential.

Messinger

Development defined defined

Normative process – everyone’s doing it

non-reversible– reorganization of the entire person

relatively stable– you can’t go back,

sequential change– crawl before you walk

Examples

Messinger

Is development

Increasing functionality in all things?– Loss of perceptual acuity in non-native languages– Old-age

Headed toward a goal?– Development has normative outcomes, – but time goes forward– prior events cause subsequent events

not the opposite

Messinger

Canalization (Waddington)

Messinger

Overview

Studying development – Longitudinal and cross-sectional

Studying behavior– Experimental and observational

Studying outcomes– Behavior and physiology

Relate to your article reviews and final projects

Messinger

Longitudinal

Same infants over time Pro: Answers ‘How do

individuals change in time?’

Con: Takes a long time– Attrition

Final project examples?

1 2 3Ba

yley

Cog

nitiv

e Sco

re

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

YearM = 93.5n = 200

YearsM = 79.1n = 190

YearsM = 82.1n = 132

Typical Trajectory:Cognitive Scores Decline

Messinger

Cross-sectional

Different infants at different times

Pro: Efficient, large numbers of subjects

Con: Differences do not necessarily reflect individual’s development

– e.g. cohort

Final project examples?

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

DifferentIndividuals

OneYearTwoYearThreeYear

Messinger

Longitudinal vs. cross-sectional

Development is relatively stable on large time scales– Motor, physical, emotional,

communicative But choppy on smaller scales

– Only longitudinal research can show this

Emergent order from chaotic, dynamic systems

Previous example?

Messinger

Hypothetical applied example from Lamb et al.

Messinger

Individual differences

Messinger

Complementary, not exclusive

A single study can combine longitudinal and cross-sectional methods

Some infant studies use neither method– They look at behavior at one point in time

E.g., Neonate study

Messinger

Predictor and predicted variables

In developmental studies, – age is a predictor– behavior or physiology are predicted

Experimental and observational studies

Messinger

Stability and continuity

Stability– Rank of individual in group is stable

Continuity– Level of behavior is continuous across ages

Messinger

Experiments are unique because

They can demonstrate causality How?

Estimated Marginal Means of MEASURE_1

SMILES

321

Est

imat

ed

Ma

rgin

al M

ean

s

.16

.14

.12

.10

.08

.06

.04

.02

EXP2

Comparison

Exposed

Messinger

Experimental design

Between subject– A treatment (independent variable) is

assigned randomly– creating treatment and control groups

Within-subject– All infants get treatment and control– Examples

Rating study, Face-to-face still-face

Estimated Marginal Means of MEASURE_1

SMILES

321

Est

imat

ed M

arg

ina

l Mea

ns

.16

.14

.12

.10

.08

.06

.04

.02

EXP2

Comparison

Exposed

Messinger

Constrained behavior in experiments Gazes at stimulus

– habituation and paired preference designs Sucking & leg kicks

– Response contingencies

Messinger

Types of observational research

Quasi-experimental – differences in naturally occurring groups

Observational - – Differences in naturally occurring conditions

Complementary, not exclusive

Is age (development) studied experimentally or observationally?

Messinger

Observational

Quasi-experiment – Between subject exploration of

differences in naturally occurring groups

Drug exposure, breast-feeding, and attachment groups

Observational– Differences in naturally

occurring conditions Gazing at mother versus gazing

away

Figure 2b.

Solo Open Mouth Smiling by Gazing at Mother

Pro

port

ion

of O

pen

Mou

th S

mili

ng O

nly

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Messinger

Predicted or dependent variables

Experimental and all observational approaches measures variables

Variable - a measurable component of behavior or physiological functioning that can take on different values

Not all aspects of behavior or physiology by specific feature of interest

Messinger

Qualitative methods

Intensive description in regular language– Not measuring variables

E.g., baby biography, one infant described over time

Pro: Insight into individual and developmental process– Emerged with romantic emphasis on individual

Con: Not generalizable Complementary, not exclusive

– Role in empirical project

Messinger

Which is best?

Longitudinal or cross-sectional Experimental, observational, or qualitative?

Messinger

Observing behavior

Observed on-line or video-recorded Measured with

– Trait rating - global judgement– Time sampling– Event sampling (frequency)– Event sampling (duration)

Messinger

Time-sampling & event-sampling

Messinger

Messinger

Physiological measures

Heart rate & respiration (video)– avoidant infants, infants on visual cliff

Electroencephalogram– Relative lateral activation during crying

Actigraphy– Index of ADD?

Increasingly important supplement to behavioral measures

Messinger

Adequacy of measures

Reliability– Consistency of measurement

Inter-rater reliability of observations

Bias– Systematic impact of unmeasured variables

Blinding in drug studies Keeping observations independent

Messinger

Validity

Are we measuring what we think we’re measuring, – Do the variables measured the constructs

mentioned in the research questions?– There is no final answer

Reunion behavior = Attachment? Smiling = Joy? Looking = Preference? Heart rate = Arousal?

Messinger

References

Infancy (Fogel) Development in infancy (Lamb, Bornstein,

& Teti)