-
ManTINEz f rxvlRohiM ENTAL Gm*up
TO: Martinez Unified School District BoardFROM: Martinez
Environmental GroupDATE: March 2,2AL5RE: School board actionstaken
on crude by rail
Attached please find information on the actions of five
California school boards in response to the dangers of
volatilecrude-by-rail affecti ng thei r I ocal districts :
1. West Contra Costa Unified School DistrictResolution 43-L415
Requesting Bay Area Air Quality Management District Reconsider
PermitL2l3/L4This resolution was passed in response to the
improperly issued BAAQMD permit that allows volatile crude
oiltrains to unload at the Kinder Morgan rail facility in Richmond.
These are the trains that have been travelingfrom Stockton to
Richmond through Martinez; if the permit is rescinded, the trains
would stop.
2. Pittsburg Unified School DistrictResolution passed \lV
lL4This resolution opposed the proposed WesPac oil terminal in
Fittsburg, which would hring 100 tanker cars of oilnear downtown
Pittsburg, homes, schools and churches.
3. Ventura Unified School DistrictResolution 15-35 Regarding
Santa Maria Phillips 66 Rail Refinery Project2/70lLsThis resolution
(along with the following two) concern the proposed Phillips 66
project that would bring mile-long trains along the Union
Pacific/Amtrak rail lines, from San Luis Obispo county to the Rodeo
refinery in ContraCosta County.
4. San Leandro Unified School DistrictLetter to San Luis Obispo
County Planning Department re: Phillips 66 Rail Spur
Project2110lLs
5. Oakland Unified School DistrictLetter to San Luis Obispo
County Planning Commission re: Phillips 66 Rail Spur
Expansion212s/Ls
Martinez Environmental Group . PO Box 33,3-L. Martinez, CA .
94553www.mrtenvgrp.corn r m [email protected]
facebook/mrtenvgrp . @mrtenvgrp{92s}7oe,HAWK
-
West Contra CostaUnified Schaol Disfrict1108 Bissell Avenue
-'_=__-tiehmon{Talifr ffifi 94801--- - --j--*--Office oftk
Supe*fndffit
ITEM REQUIRING ATTENTTON-BOARrI otr' ETIUCATTON
To:
From:
Subject:
Board ofEducation
Bruce HarterSuperintendent
Resolution No . 43-1415 :
Meeting llate: December 3,2074
Agerdaltem: F"l
Requesting BAAQMD Reconsider Permit
Background Information:At the request of Mr. Andres Soto, Board
President Ramsey has placed Resolution No . 43-1415 or the agenda
forthe Board to consider requesting the Bay fuea Air Quality
Management Dishict {BAAQIUD) reconsider itsdecision to grant a
permit to Kinder lHorgan.
Recommendation:That the Board review andac. upon Mr. Soto's
request
Fiscatfmpact: Noae
DISPOSITION BY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Motion by: Secondedby:
Approved NotApproved Tabled
-
RESOLUTION FIo, 43-1415
RE$OLImONTHE WEST CO}I,IRA COSTff,}TtrED SCXOOL DIST*ICT
AGAIT{S TETTTSSN MORGAN RICIIMOND'S CRUDE BY RAIL
OPERATIONWHEREAS, the fossil fuel indusries have already accessed
rea{ily accessible fossil fuelsamd me rreiug extreme extraction
tec,&nologies to remove the remaining fo,ms of fossilfuels,
WHEREAS, crude oil fracked from the Bakken Shale Forrnation and
mhed from theAlbefiaTa Sands preseut existent environmental damage
to the lanq air andwater ofthose are*s anrl a risk to the fuare
inhabitability ofthe EadlL
WHEREAS, these crude oils are discounted in costs and exhactd in
the center of theNorth American contineilt far away frommqior
refineries and consumermarketsrequiring hmsportation via pipetine
or raif
WHEREAS, the US and Canadian rail companies are corlmon
carriers, meaning they arerquired to carry wh*eve,rproduct shipprs
wishto put onthe rail lines resulting in a4,$Wa ia*ease of these
materials being tafried oa the mil liqss in the past 3 years,
WHEREAS, this i*nease in Cnrde By Rail on has resutted in
several disastershere and in Canada (Lac Megar*ic, Quebec,
Casseltoq NorthDakota Flammond,Indiana Aliceville, Alabama,
Lynchburg, Yirginia as well as several near misses) whichhave
resulted in tfue loss of human life aad biilions of dollars of
damages to communiliesand their zunounding environme,n!
WHEREAS, US consumers are increasingly using less refined fossil
firels products,particutarly gasoling thus oil refiners are
iircrea.singlyfirrningtc exportmad(eB for.theirUS refined
products,
WHEREAS, fhe exfraction of and the refining of extreme extracted
crude oils such asBakken and Tar Sands knowingly result in
increaseC greenhouse gas (GHG) emissionsand toxic air contaminant
c+-pollutants,
WHEREAS, the Bay AreaAir Quality Mmegeurent District (BAAQI,D)
issued apermitministerially to Kinder Morgan to convert its
ethanol-by-rail operation at the BNSF railyard in Richmond to a
Crud; By Rail operation and chose to not noti$ members of thepublic
or even its oum governing board,
WHEREAS, Kinder Morgan signed an exclusive conkact with Tesoro
Golden Eaglerefinery in Avon, Califomia, to srryply them with the
fracked Bakken crude &om NorthDakota via tanker tnrcks over our
local roads, and state and federal highways,
Resohrtion No. 43-1415
-
WHEREAS, Kiuder Morgaa is bringing in up to three unit trains of
100 ears per week
creating svenmsre dieselpclldioainalrmdy impasfed
comgunities,WHEREAS, the people of Richmond and the Bay Area hd no
knowledge of the KindaMorgan Richmond operation being permitted by
BAAQMD rmtil an investigative r,portby KPD( televised the report
showing the operation in action,
WHEREAS, Earthjustice, on behalf of Asian Facific Envirmmental
NetworhCommunities for aBetterEnvironment,Natural ResourcesDefense
Cor.rncil andtheSierra Club, fited for injrmrtive relief in San
Frmcisco Srryerior Court to stop the KindsMorgan Richmond operaticn
until such time apub'lic review uader &e
CaliforniaEnvironme,ntal Quality Act (CEQA) was conclude{
WHEREAS, Judge James Busch determined the case could not move
fonnard becausethe stahrte of,limitations of 180 days hadpassedby
thetime the astion was filed" leavingthe people of Richmond" its
instihdions md try rail communities rmprotected from therisk of
catasmophic explosirms rrrd unable to
lmment ushs CEQA
WHEREAS, onNovem&r7,2ll4,Interstate Oil Co. no longeruses
McClellan BusinessPark in Sacramento as a Bakken Crude transfer
shrion, ideutical to the Kinder MorganRichmondaperation,
subqequsntto settliry a lawsuitbyEarthJustice ed Larry
Greetre,Executive Director of the Sacramento Metrrapolitan Air
Quality Disdet, said *We madear error rten the permit was develo@,
*O it shotrld have gone to a full CEQA review,
WHEREA$ an analysis ofpotential blast zone radii ofrail liaes
carrying Bakken and TarSands crrdf throughRichmmdand
S/estContraCostacountywouldimpact 27 schoolsand the Adminishation
0ffice building of &e West Contra Costa Uniied qchql
Dishict,
WHEREAS, the same blasr mne map indicates the impact in the City
of Richmondwould include the Kaiser Hospital, forncommunity certrs,
most of the NeighborhoodC-otmcildisticts, theRiehmondCivic Center,
the RichmondPolict Headquarters andfive of seven Richmond Fire
Stations,
WIIEREAS, most local,schools, parts of Contra Costa College,
mostofthe businessdii.hict and most residents of the City of San
Pablo are ia &e idmtified llast zone radius,
WHEREAS, previous rail car derailnent explosioms of Bakke$ crude
in Norlh Amcricahave demonstratedmostemergency respondlrs,
includingthose inWest Con&Co$taCormty, do not have sufficient
equipment and supplieso zuch as fire suppression foam,
toadeqr:ately respcndCI acm.sftophic eqplcsion of arail
cardaailme,ntexplosiclt,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the West ConbaCostaUnified School
DisEidBoardof Trustees disagrees in the strongest possible trms
with the BAAQIvID staffFs decisionto issue a ministerial pernnit
without any public notification or review to Kinder Morgan
per
Rmolution No. 43-f415
-
Richmond for the offloading of Bakke[ crude oil and Alberta Tar
Sands clude oil at itslediirl fcrliryEt tie BNSFmil yard m-,
Richmon4 C4
TIIEREFORE BE tT AISO RESOLVED, the Vest Contra Costa Udfied
School DistrictBoad ofEducatiotr rEquests fu BAAQMD Board of
DiEctots to Eview the KinderMorgatr perdit ad, iffeasible, rcvoke
the permit aod subject the project to a completeCEQA process,
PASSED AND ADOPTED by lhe Govemhg Boad ofthe Wesl Contra Cosla
UdfiedSchool District of Contra C-osta Coulfy, Califom;4 on
December 3' 2014 by thefollowing vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
I }IEREBY CERTtrY thal $e forcgoing rcsolution was duly od
rEgularty introdrc4passed, aod adopled by the oembers ofthe
GovemiBg Board oflhe West Conta Costai-loif"a S"mot Oi"tri"t at a
public oeeting ofsaid BoEd beld on December 3, 2014'
Todd GrovesClerk, Board of Education
Rmlutiotr No.43-1415
-
2i2812015 Pitbbirg: Schod tnrste take sbnd ryirst WePac
oil-by-rail prQect - ConffsctaTimes,com
Pittsburg: $chool trustees take stand against WesPac
oil-by+ailproiectBy Eve Mitdtell Contn Cosfa ??mesltpdated:
OUOWZaI4 o4:17:23 PM pDT COntraCOStaTimeS.COm
PITTSBURG -
Pittsburg school district trustees have taken a stand against
the proposed WesPac oilstorage and transfer project.The resolution,
approved by a 5-0 vote at Wednesday night's meeting, carries no
legal power to stop theproject, but it is yet another blow to a
developer's plan to transport domestic crude oil by rail cars
tostorage tanks, from where it would be piped to local
refineries.
The resolution originated with district trustees after a
presentation on the project made in March byproject opponents."l
don't think anybody on this board is against industry," trustee Mne
Ferrante said after the meeting,adding that recent reports of
crude-by-rail explosions are a matter of great concern-
"We really have a focus on the children. lt doesn't end when
they walk out of the classroom," Ferrantesaid- "The city has done a
wonderfuljob developing downtown- This is a situation where we felt
thisproject may not fit because of its proximity to residences,
churches and schools."The board's action is a bold statement, said
Lisa Graham, a member of the Pittsburg Defense Council,which is
fighting the WesPac project. "lt has an amazing impact because it
is a very significant body thatrepresents lots of people, students,
faculty and families," she said. "(Trustees) have made a very
boldand defensive statement to protect their mnstituents."
The resolution calls on the Pittsburg City Council and other
local, state and federal government agenciesto categorize the
WesPac project as "unequivocally contrary to public health and
safety and beyondmitigation, and dec{are that it should not he
placed within Pittsburg nor anywhere in Contra CostaCounty."
Mayor Sal Evola disagreed with the resolution.
"The school board's action is outside of their purview, and it
is premature. I feel there is a process thecity is obliged to abide
by to review all of the proposal and then make an informed
decision,' he said-
"One may question if the school board is out of line. Their
action crosses the line between schoolbusiness and city business.
.-" We don't take up resolutions on their issues- I don't feel the
school district... should take up a position on our issues,
especially while the project is under review-'The $200 mitlion
waterfront project, which would be built near homes, schools and
churches, would bringan average of 88 million barrels annually of
dornestic crude oil by railand imported crude by marinevessels to a
125-acre storage facility next to vfrrat is now the NRG power planl
The oil would be storedin 16 upgraded or new storage tanks that
once stored fuel oilfor a forrner PG&E power plant more than25
years ago.
Project supporters say it would help refineries take advantage
of a domestic oil boom at a time whenCalifornia production is
falling. WesPac officials have said the proiect would be safe,
addressenvironmental concern raised by opponents, create jobs and
provide $800,000 in yearly property taxand tidelands lease revenue
to the city.
ln February, the City Council voted to reopen the project's
public review process in response to safety,air quality and other
environmental mncerns raised by residents, A new timeline for the
reyiew processis still being worked out by city staff.
[email protected]
gfnCWfifish,.ryschod-husbei*e-star*agsinsawespac-oil/ffisqus_thrd
-
2lm{?o15 Pittshrg Sc*tod trustes td stird ryirst tYePac
cil-by-rail trqed - CorffaCstaTimes.cornThe state Attorney
General's Office wrote in a January letter that the draft
environmential impact reportfailed to disdose the sources of the
crude oil and their environmental impacts, rrvhich made the
entiredocument inadequate.
However, in an online presentation about the project, WesPac has
said the domestic crude would comeftom the Bakken region of North
Dakota, Colorado, ruest Texas and New Mexico- Bakken crude oil
hasbeen involved in several recent explosions while being moved by
rail.
Contact Eve Mitchell at925-779-7189. Follow her at
Twitter.comlEastCounty_Girl.
. hftp:l
ffww.csrkacostdimes.cqn/confacmtatimedci_25l204Bpittsburgschool-Austwtake.starxfagainst-wespac-oilftrisqus-thrd
2r2
-
Agenda, February 10, 2015 Page D8
VET{TURA UNIFIED $CHOOL BIST*ICTBOARD OF EDUCATION
RESOLUTIOIT #{5-05Regarding $snh iltar*a Fhiltip*SS Eail Resnery
proi*ct
WHEREAS, school district goveming boards have the oltigation to
p*cvide a safe andhealthy leemirq environment for all students and
to urge the $an Luis Obispo Coung FlanningCsmmissisn and Board sf
$upryt$fit tc reid tfle 8afita Maria Philfips 66 Rail
RefireryPraiec{ Ar represantatiuet of sfule loffited alol6 ihe
propcsed rail rout*, *e ureu6 hdirectly impacted ly thee od trains,
and do nct apport the projed for reasone outlined belorrv.
IryHEREAS, The Phillipc 66 oillrain pmject wauld bring mile-long
oil trains right throughrnany Gatifornia coflIryl$nities a$d nerd
to dEzens of sehaals" Schssl emglcyee are atate-mandated disaster
urerkars whik on th* iob, and $rs are nct at all equipd tc deal
with thedangers posed by this Frojct or to adegualety protecrt the
lives and the uellheing of aureludenls. This proiect creates
unacceptable risks for our sfudents, teachem, and *taff.
$ftlEHEAS, The dra* E**irc*rnental Inrpacfi Report {ElR} daes
not adequateg **secettE risks sf an oil kain disasto4 the drafi
only e*raluates rail-acciderrt rates fum Z$fi1ha ZSIZand spill
raies betrreen 2$05 and ?S0$, omittirg cru*ial date about a*cident
freguercy arrdmagnitude in 2013 and 2014. This is koubling hecause
we know that more crude spilled framtrains in ?013 than dufng *re
rct fsur #*a&s *mbired" The EIR nnud lmk at raced data,u,hicft
rcSffia the increasd quantfiias af crude bei$g trail$portcd in old
and unsafe terd< care.The dran EIR uses outdated data fral
drastically underestimates the danger of a derailment orspill,
which could put our scftssl communilies and children at severe
risk. While schsolempl*yees are *ate{tandated disas*er l,lprkss
r*frile on i}6 iob, 1#e are *st d afl prepared furthe accida*ts
ftat canil happen fam ttreee teary, darlgemls trainc conkiniry
hszerdars s*1"
WHEREAS, Th EIR's woret-case srenaria estimates a spilt of
180,000 gallons, orroughlysix tanh cars of sude- This is most
definitely a miscalculalion because crude trains have1* sr msrc
tank ers, carryirq mi$ions of gallms. $ur*r a s$11 neuld certainly
be rnore lfian130,ffiS gallan*. ln fact, the oil truino in &is
pro*d ruouk be errying almoet 3 mitlion gallcn*each. A *pill would
devastate our schools, scerce rrater resources, sensitive
eccsystems,homes and local economies.
*YllEfiE*S, The toxic air emissions fiat will affimpanf ttris
rypd psss arlunacceptaHe risk to public,health. ln ite lat6t
erwirunmental revlen*r Phi{tip S admits that itsprope*d ail train
facility uill create'bignificant ard unavoida$e" levels of air
pclltfion along Serail ror*4, w{th sulfur dioxide and other toxic
chemicals leaked that increase risk of cancer, heartdisease,
respiratory discase a*d premature deaft- Thie is una*Sable risk lo
the hsattl $fss*tssl cfrildren and educators clo*e ts ttle
tr:acks.
-
Agerd*. Febmary I0, 2Ot5 Page D9
HOW TIIEXEFORE, EE IT Rf;SCLtfE$, &d the Eoerd *f Edecaticn
sf the VenturaUni$ed Sc{tool Distrid stroflgly oppo$ee this prejec{
for allthe ahow stated ree$on$. We urgethe San Luis Obispo Gounty
Planoing Commisslofi and Board of $upervlscrs to eoundly rejec{the
Phillips 6S proposed ci} train pra*et *?e stmrgly e*cs$rega you to
act and sdvocate brtke peoph expres*ing gsave concerrls absq*t tfe
impds thia polec* wcuH haye on ourcommunities.
AFPROVED, FAS$ED *ilD ABOPTED by the Baard of EducdiEn of the
Vrntura Untfisd$dtool OtsEict af Yerrft,rra, Califunia tfris 1S day
af February, 2.015 iy ttle foltcn*ir6 vete:
AYE$:N0ESI
Vice Prosident, Board af Educ*ion
ftderrber, Board of Educatbn
ATTE$T:
President Board of Eduqtion
AB$EHT:AB$TAItrl:
Memkr, Board of Edu*tion
idemher, Board of Education
Secletary ta the Gavemirq BEarda*d VU$D Srtpsintenerrt
-
ffirErffiBoard of Eikrcaitloa
Diana ProhFresidni
RorkeyViePresidmi.
Vtnce J. RosdoClerk
Evel5rr GoazalezMember
Lanee JauesMember
llaca[cyMember
Leo SheridaaMemts
ttke Xcl,aug$tn, td.D.Superintendrrt of Sc*rmls
Roearna fueelti, EdJl"Deput5r $uperintendentEdumtimal Senims
John Thompaon, Ed.D.Asistant SuperinteldmtHumRemtarh
trtfaelliAsisinnt $uperinimdmtBusinrx & ()pemiions
San Leandro Unified School DistrictOlfice of the
Supwintendenl
Mr. Murray WilsonDepartment of Planning and BuildingSan Luis
Obispo County976 Osos Street, Rmm 3OOSan Luis Obispo, Cl\ 93408
RE: Phillips 66 RailSpur Project
Dear Planning Commissioners,
The San Leandro Unified School t[strict Board would like to
state our concerns regarding thePhillips 66 oil train offloading
facility expansion in San Luis Obispo County- The Board
isparticularly concerned with the increase in oil-train traffic
generated by this project throughmany densely populated areas,
including San Leandro, and the risk it poses to our schoolsalong
the rail route.
The most significant impact identified in the Revised Draft
Environmental lmpact Report{RDEIR} is accidents on the main rail
line that could result in oil spills, fires, and explosions
nearpopulated areas. Our crrrent rail system is designed to connect
residents ta their destinationsthroughout the entire Bay Area, not
to move large quantities of hazardous materials like crudeoil.
Additionally, rnore than ten schools in the City of San Leandro,
and the San LeandroUnified School District Board building, are
within the one-mile US Department ofTransportation Potential lmpact
Zone in the case of an oil train derailrnent or fire.
The RDEIR also did not evaluate the relative air quality or
greenhouse gas emissions for theentire project area, which includes
oil transport through San Leandrc from Canada to the Sanluis Obispo
County facility. The diesel emissions from operational activities
of trains along theroute would generate toxic pollutant emissions
that exceed thresholds, increasing the risk ofcaficer, heart
disease, and respiratory disease, especially in the very young,
There is already ahigh incidence of childhood asthma in San Leandro
- asthma hospitalization rate in AlamedaCounty has twice the state
average and is the third-highest in California. Therefore,
thisproject would directly compromise the health and safety our
school communities along therail route in San Leandro-
On Fehruary L0,20L5, the San Leandro Unified School District
Board voted to respectfullyrequest that the San Luis Obispo
Planning Commission vote to deny the project.
Sincerely,
Mike Mclaughlin. Ed-D.Superintendent
835 E. 74h Street, Suite 2OO, tutt Icondrq CA 94577?cl:
51,O67-3522 totts*.shtsd,us ?sx: 51&66-l-6234
-
OTFICE ST THf SOARD CF.EI}gCITIOil10CI0 Broadway, $uite
680Oakland, CA 94607-40995f0.87S.$ 99'*,r . 510.879.3299 f
*510.$7t.2300
-\ . TDIwwwousd.kl2.ca.us
@) "ittilffi:?EF
,}r** l{d*b. Pre*id,fnt, Distrif,t
7jan:*s.llarris@ousd,kl.2,ca.uslrrEtoti Nir*ofi ffodge, Dirtrict
3
lumoke.llcdge@a$sd,kl2,ca.us
*fi*a* ur ssu{&?I*f* 3s:5Jody Londoa, V(e Presl#nt, Di*rlct
I
Jody. London@ous{. k 12.ca.usAim*a Sse}o Erlgr ehstrici ;
Ainrce.Eng@usd. k I2,ra.us
$har*hi Go.tzatci, Distri(t 6shanft [email protected] I
2,ca.irs
l*ina 3*n*, $istridt 4ilina.Se*n@ousd,k1 2,ca,us
ftoeeannT{rre, Sistrr* 5Rosean*,Torres8ousd.k 12..4, us
February 25. 20:.5 File lO l{umber; {q*lfltroductior
Data:Enactmeflt Number:Mr. Ken Topping, Chair
County of San Luis ObispoPlanning Commission975 Oso:Street,
Roorn 3O0San Luis Obispo, California 93408
Enactrnent Date: il #7r{eyfl$* -+.'..-
Rt: P_hiliips SS Eell Jrssi !rySfl piqn
Oear Chairper:on Topping and Members of the Planning
Comrnission:
The Oakland Unified School District Soard of Education wishes to
convey ts ysu its concernr regardingthe Phitlips 66 oil train
offloading facility expansion in San Luis Obispo County. The Board
is particularlyconcerned with the increase it oil-train traffic
that will be generated by this project through manydensely
populated arear, lncluding Oakland, a*d the risk it pases tc the
students and families in ourschools along t}:e rail route.
The msst significant inrpact identified in the ftevised Sraft
Environmental lmpact Report {-RDflR") isaccidents on the main rail
line that could result ln oil spills, fires, and explosions near
populated areas.Our current rail rystem is designed ta conneet
residents to their destinations throughout the entire BayAree and
beyord, not to rnov large quantities af hazardous ffralerials tike
crude cil. Additionally, atleast a dozen schosls irl the City gf
$akland, as *rell as the Oakland Unified Srhool
$istrictAdrfiinistration headquarters, are within the one-mile U.5.
Depa*mrnt of Transpartation Pstentiallmpact Zone in the case of an
ail train derailment cr fire.
Ihe RDEIE alsa did *Gt e\raluate the relatiye air qualiff ar
greenhouse gas enRissions for the entireproject area. which
includes oil traflsport ihro*gh 5a* Leandra frar* Canada tc the san
l-uis ObispoCounty faciiity. The diesel ernissions from operational
activities ef trains along the rsute would generattoxic pollutant
ernlssions that exceed thresholds, increasing the risk of cancer,
heart disease, andrespiratory disease among the entire population,
especially i* the very young. Residents in these samentighborhaods
have heen dscumented by the Alanreda County Deparlme*t of Public
ltealth ta havelower life expectancies tha* resideats irt other
pafs cf c*r city io part hecause cf the eoviranm.entalhaeards of
living near a train line. There are darens of school: and 20,600
students vrrithin oae mile ofuain tracks in our Bisrict. There is
already a high incidrnce of childhood asthma in the neighborhoodsof
Sakland along the train route
- asthrna hospitalization ia Alameda County has twice the $tate
average
aad is the third high*t in California. Therefore, this project
woutd directly the l'realrh and safety of ourxhoal ccnrmrrnities
along the rai* rsute in Gakla*d.
-
Mr. Ke* Toppi*g, ChairRe: Pjrillir:_66 RaitSpur ?rojectFebnrary
?5, 2$15Page 3 *f !
*n F*bruary ?5, ?S:.5, tls Sakland unified Se|'ro*l *istrict
Board cf Educatian v*ied to, a*d hereby dcesresprtfrrily. re*ir*st
qhat tl:e Sa* l*.*is #blspc County Fianning Csmmissicn ucte te
riecly the Phitrlips 66Eail Sprrr Expansion.
Ji't:JL:ii
cc: Members, S+ard cf Edueatis*Ant\ryafi Wilscn,
Superi*te*de*tlserretaryJacqueline Mi*or, Gener:l Csunsel