Page 1
Meeting Report
Post Rio+20 Meeting of Civil Society
and Trade Unions in Africa
Nairobi, 19-20 November, 2012
Jointly organized by the Friedrich-Ebert-
Stiftung and UNEP
Nairobi Safari Club (Lilian Towers),
Nairobi, Kenya
By Kevin Osido Esq, presented to
Friedrich Ebert Stiftung
Page 2
1.0. INTRODUCTION
This report documents the issues and deliberations reached at a workshop held in Nairobi, Kenya
at Lillian Towers- Hotel on 19th – 20
th November 2012. It reflects the Civil Society and Trade
Union in Africa‘s perspective on the Post Rio +20 forum with a view to having the Civil Society
and Trade Unions play a key role in the implementation of the Rio +20 agreements.
The meeting brought together delegates from South Africa, Ghana, Nigeria, Uganda, Tanzania,
Zambia, Namibia and Kenya as the host country. There were also UNEP officials and the Kenya-
Ministry of Environment.
2.0. MEETING AGENDA
The agenda of the meeting was as follows:
2.1. Opening session
Welcome remarks by the Representative of FES, Peter Oesterdiekholf
Welcome remarks by the Representative of UNEP,
Opening address; The Environment Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Mineral
Resources, Dr. Alice Kaudi
2.2. Session 1 - Setting the Scene: the Rio+20 Outcome Document ―The Future
We Want‖
Overall Presentation on the Rio+20 outcomes: what do they mean for Africa, and for its civil
society?, by Munetsi Madakufamba, SARDC
Presentation of the September 2012 AMCEN Meeting: what recommendations to the
AMCEN/African Union? by Joseph Mithika Mwenda, PACJA
Discussion – Question and answers
2.3. Session 2 – The Post-2015 Development Agenda and alternative
development models
The Post-2015 Development Agenda – Entry points for Major Groups and Stakeholders
Presentation by Fatou Ndoye, UNEP
Structural transformation and sustainable development in Africa Presentation by David
Owiro, IEA
2.4. Working Groups: From ―The Future We Want‖ to the Post-2015
development framework: what matters for Africa, for African civil society?
The working groups were to discuss and agree on recommendations/messages for African
Decision Makers on:
the implementation of the Rio + 20 outcomes [facilitator: Munetsi Madakufamba, SARDC];
Page 3
the inter-linkages and synergies between the post Rio+20 and the post-2015 development
framework [facilitator: Mwangi Waituru, Beyond 2015]
Each working group would have a facilitator and select a rapporteur that would be part of a
drafting team that would finalise the key messages of the meeting.
2.5. Evening Session: Drafting Team session 1
The drafting team (facilitators and rapporteurs) would work on the final messages and produce a
declaration or a communiqué.
DAY II: 20th November 2012
2.6. Working Groups- continued
Session 3 – Report back from working groups
Discussion, question and answers
Session 4 - Strengthening Civil Society participation in UNEP‘s work in Africa
This session was facilitated by Gertrude Ngenda, UNEP, and also featured a presentation on UNEP‘s
work in the region. Participants then discussed potential opportunities for continuous engagement
with UNEP at the regional level.
Discussion, question and answers
2.7. In parallel: Drafting team meeting
Session 5 - Presentation of the final declaration or communiqué
The declaration or communiqué was finalised and adopted.
Closure and Cocktail
3.0. PRELIMINARIES
The meeting began with Mr. Alexander Juras, the Facilitator of the sessions bringing participants
to speed as he explained that the meeting was convened to enable participants to understand the
Rio +20 meeting in terms of what happened, the expectations and also what needs to be done
to keep the ball rolling. He added that for the two days of the meeting, participants will be
expected to form working groups which would then generate a document that would form the
next steps of engagement in the form of a communiqué or a memorandum. He then asked the
participants to take a few minutes to introduce themselves including the organizations that they
represent and their parent countries.
Page 4
4.0. OPENING REMARKS
4.1. Resident Director of FES, Peter Oesterdiekholf
Invited the participants to the meeting
Thanked participants for taking their time to attend the Africa CSO Rio+20 meeting in
Nairobi.
Outlined the essence of the partnership between FES and UNEP in giving Africa Civil
Society Organizations and opportunity to also interact with the RIO+20 process
He wished the participants a productive 2 days.
The Resident Director of FES, Peter Oesterdiekholf makes his Meeting Remarks. Listening far right is Mr. Jiri Hlavacek,
Deputy Director, Division of Regional Cooperation, UNEP
1.1. Jiri Hlavacek, Deputy Director, Division of Regional Cooperation, UNEP
Indicated that this way a special meeting convened after other meetings regarding the
kind of future that is in store for Africa with the theme, ―the future we want‖
Asked the participants to commit to continue to implement the goals and realization of
agenda 21 which is on- going as outlined in the Outcome document- sustainable
development,
Also indicated that the upgrade of UN Office, otherwise called the ―Famous paragraph
88‖ had a concept of green economy and in pages 183- 18, there was a special mention
of Africa that governments and international community should endeavor to assist Africa
Africa was the second after Asian Pacific to host the African Ministerial Conference in
Arusha, Tanzania
Page 5
The aim of this meeting was to deliver some part of the Rio+20 document which had 10
Flagship components, including the role of CSOs
Africa is ready to cooperate with other stakeholders in the realization of the
Environmental goals
UNEP will do its part in the family to realize the various goals including MDGs of 2002
UN Conference on Sustainable Development: Despite remarkable rates of Economic
growth in 2002 where GDP grew by 5.5%, in 2011 the GDP reduced to 2.7% so this is a
challenge not only to Africa but also to the global community
Sustainable concept is aimed at poverty eradication and despite negative impacts of
environment, Africa still continues to do what it can do regarding International
Community and cooperation and also Impacts of Climate change
NEPAD has various vision documents that have been picked up by countries such as
Kenya, Zambia, Tanzania, and Nigeria among others.
Thanked these countries for such a strong force in striving to ensure sustainable
development
UNEP wants to be an active part in all this and the new MTP for UNEP 2013- 2017;
environment is key in these aspects
Encouraged the stakeholders to discover their role and ask for relevant assistance from
UNEP in achieving these goals
Mr. Hlavacek thanked all for coming and wished the participants fruitful discussions and also
thanked them for their desire to influence their work in a positive way.
1.2. Dr. Alice Kaudia: Environment Secretary, Ministry of Environment and
Mineral Resources
She started by informing the participants that she represented Kenya in the UN Forum on Forests,
where she was a Women Ambassador. He remarks caused laughter when she said that some of
the ways in which decisions have been taken have not been very effective as decision- makers
have made such decisions by emailed documents then people meet in New York in side meetings
after the meetings for major groups and ultimately decisions are made sometimes without the
views of the major common groups. She thanked FES and UNEP for putting up a meeting which
was different from the others.
Trade Unions and Civil Society are major groups that can transform the countries n Africa
CSOs have touch with the people that government policies are supposed to affect majorly
as they seek to translate them to the citizenry in languages that they can easily understand
Trade Unions ensure growth and development or upheavals through various means
These 2 governance institutions can anchor themselves to enable government to realize
Rio+20 so as to realize the agreed targets by talking about Green Economy; advocating
for Low carbon development, Cleaner consumption, Production and resource efficiency
Africa can become a creditor of natural resources to the development world or it can also
choose to continue in the nexus of poverty
Rio+20 was not necessarily about poverty eradication whereas some of these poverty
related issues can be dealt with through sustainable development
CSOs should support Africa in terms of how some of these targets can be met and they
also need to look towards ways of transitioning towards Green Economy.
Kenya began talking about renewable energy projects in 1982
Page 6
Sustainable Development should be about leading a quality life and also having good
global economic relations
Africa is endowed with resources in Agriculture, Mining and Natural Resources these
should be used for changing the lives of the people
Pledges were made in billions towards for a series of projects and Africa needs to have a
strategy to negotiate for this and the CSOs and Trade Unions are key in this front
Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development; there should be governance and
organizational frameworks that will enable Africa to move forward
Africa is not short of laws and strategies, for example Kenya‘s Constitution provides for a
sustainable environment for all as a human right
On compliance, she indicated that
CSO and Trade Unions should engage the citizenry in helping them understand the
provisions
CSO should also assist governments in forming a clear definition of green economy, green
jobs and how this will guarantee good life to various groupings- women, youth, persons
with disability following the principle of common but differentiated capabilities andn
functions
CSO and governments should assess internal capabilities and move within those means to
attain a global vision
CSOs and governments should welcome the concept of Green Economy and proceed to
deal with the major issues – not definitions
Dr. Alice Kaudia: Environment Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources- Kenya, makes her remarks
during the meeting.
Page 7
Kenya‘s Achievements:
Conducted a scoping study with the support of UNEP
Formulated a National Strategy guided by the principle failing to plan is planning to fail
Integrated national sectors to realize a set of objectives with defined set of technology
Agriculture is key and Kenya has taken on the Life Cycle of Value Chain concept
Formulated the National Climate response strategy in 2001
Currently analyzing SDGs goals and aligning them to the indicators of Green Economy
In finishing, Dr. Kaudia encouraged the participants to clearly document their challenges and
make good recommendations that will transform lives of the people. With these remarks, she
declared the workshop officially opened.
2.0. PRESENTATIONS
2.1. Setting the Scene: the Rio+20 Outcome Document ―The Future We
Want‖: Overall Presentation on the Rio+20 outcomes: what do they
mean for Africa, and for its civil society?; Munetsi Madakufamba,
Programmes Director & Deputy CEO; Southern African Research and
Documentation Centre (SARDC)
2.1.1. Rio+20 Outcome Document ―The Future We Want‖: A Critical
Review
Munetsi began by giving the ‗92 history of development which was hailed as a great success. The
next question which he posed to the participants was what has gone wrong 20 years on?. He
proceeded by adding that the world continues to face a multitude of challenges despite the
various principles and pledges made at the Earth Summit in 1992. Some of these crises include:
Energy crises
Food crises
Water scarcity
Land degradation
Biodiversity loss
Poverty
Climate change
Deforestation
Pollution
Financial and economic crises
Ocean acidification
High population growth
It was interesting to note that nowhere in the world are these crises more acute than in Africa!
Rio+20 Conference‘s two-pronged themes were:
1. A green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication;
Page 8
2. The institutional framework for sustainable development
2.1.2. Objectives of Conference were:
a) Secure renewed political commitment for sustainable development;
b) Assess the progress to date and the remaining gaps in the implementation of the outcomes
of the major summits on sustainable development; and
c) Address new and emerging challenges.
Expectations before the Conference; there was a reaffirmation of the original Rio principles and
commitments adopted 20 years ago. These included:
i. Common But Differentiated Responsibilities
ii. Provision of new and additional financial resources for sustainable development
iii. Provision of Technology transfer
iv. Recognition that the crises in environment and economy are even more serious today
than 20 years ago,
v. Adoption of new commitments by the political leaders that are adequate enough to
tackle these crises in a systematic way
vi. Agreement to significantly strengthen the institutions for addressing sustainable
development
vii. Strengthened UNEP with more resources
viii. Clear commitments to support developing countries to meet the sustainable development
agenda
ix. Launch a process on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for the post 2015 period
which should interface meaningfully with the post -2015 MDG process
2.1.3. The Green Economy
The conference affirmed that there are different approaches, visions, models and tools available
to each country to achieve sustainable development, where Green economy is considered as one
of the important tools, guided by the Rio Principles, Agenda 21, the JPOI and contributing to the
MDGs. It was also expected to promote inclusive growth, strengthen finance and technology
transfer to developing countries, avoid aid and finance conditionalities. The conference also
resolved that GE should not be used for trade protectionism.
Munetsi believed that there are lingering fears that the concept could still be abused by the
developed countries to impose indirect trade barriers on the pretext of compliance with new
requirements during the global transition to the green economy.
Rio+20 further agreed that GE should help close North-South technology gaps, address poverty
and inequalities and promote sustainable consumption and production patterns. The UN system
and relevant donors were asked to coordinate and provide information on matching interested
countries with partners to provide requested support, toolboxes and best practices in applying
green economy policies and methodologies for evaluating policies.
Page 9
Although Green Economy was the main topic of the Conference, it still remains debatable in the
outcome document what is the exact or agreed definition of Green Economy and therefore no
mutual understanding. Therefore, Munetsi urged African civil societies to be concerned that
without a common view on what Green Economy means; the deployment of the concept in the
African context would therefore remain questionable.
2.1.4. Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development (IFSD)
He indicated that the Conference agreed to set up a High-Level Political Forum on sustainable
development, to replace the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). The CSD does not
have a mechanism for implementation and a financing element. It also fails to occupy a
particularly strategic space in the UN system, being a functioning commission of the ECOSOC.
There is thus the High-level political forum which should eventually replace the CSD. This High-
Level Political Forum would have a number of functions, such as:
Providing political leadership and recommendations for sustainable development;
Providing a platform for regular dialogue and agenda setting, considering new sustainable
development challenges;
Reviewing progress in implementation and improving coordination in the UN system;
Coming up with an action-oriented agenda for new and emerging challenges;
Following up on implementation of all the sustainable development commitments,
ensuring coordination within the UN system;
Promoting system-wide coherence and coordination of sustainable development policies.
2.1.5. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
He said that UNEP is not a specialized agency but a subsidiary programme, with no direct
communication channel to UN General Assembly. Rio+20 agreed that UNEP should be
strengthened and upgraded, including the establishment of a universal membership of its
Governing Council (that previously had only 58 members), provision of stable and adequate
financing and strengthening its regional presence.
At present, country offices in Africa are in Kenya (UNEP HQ), Ethiopia, and South Africa. He also
informed the participants that AMCEN has asked for establishment of five sub-regional offices in
Africa.
2.1.6. Means of Implementation (Finance, Technology Transfer and
Capacity Building)
The conference did not reaffirm provision for new financing for developing countries to meet
their sustainable development targets. No funds were allocated to finance projects in developing
countries; the leaders only reaffirmed that there is need for additional resources viz,
―We reaffirm that developing countries need additional resources for
sustainable development‖
Page 10
The meeting was informed that developing countries backed a proposal for a US$30 billion
global fund for sustainable development, which was shot down by the EU before its merits could
even be discussed. The conference went as far as only agreeing that there would be a follow-up
process for finance and technology transfer after Rio+20.
2.1.7. Financing
Action was deferred to other fora e.g. an inter-governmental process was to start, under the
General Assembly to assess financing needs, existing frameworks and additional initiatives, to
prepare a report towards a Sustainable Development Financing Strategy for the mobilization of
resources. To this front, a committee of 30 experts nominated by regional groups will implement
this process and conclude its work by 2014. Mr. Munetsi thus concluded that therefore seems to
be no resources between now and 2014 while the process unfolds.
2.1.8. Technology Transfer
While emphasizing the need for Technology Transfer, the conference did not agree on how this
was to be done. UN agencies were requested to identify options for a facilitation mechanism to
promote development, transfer and dissemination of environmentally sound technologies by
assessing technology needs of developing countries, options to address them and capacity
building. The UN Secretary General was asked to make recommendations on this mechanism to
the General Assembly‘s 67th session (2013). Again, action on technology transfer was deferred to
other fora, just like finance.
In Conclusion, Mr. Munetsi indicated that overall, on Political Commitment; the conference
reaffirmed the original Rio Principles including CBDR except for commitments regarding new and
additional Financial Resources and Technology Transfer. However, some critics (China & G77-
including most of Africa) saw the outcome document text as having been constantly watered
down to the extent that it became a less effective declaration. Therefore the document has been
heavily criticized as having produced weak and non-binding commitments (e.g. littered with
language such as reaffirm, recognize, acknowledge, underscore, etc.)
He said that it was not surprising that Rio+20 has been criticized as having failed to come up
with clear actions towards SD. Some of the reactions from the globe that he shared included:
―Rio will go down as the hoax summit. They came, they talked, but they failed to
act.‖—Oxfam
―We didn‘t get the Future WE Want in Rio, because we do not have the leaders we need.
The leaders of the most powerful countries supported Business as Usual, shamefully
putting private profit before people and the planet.‖ – Green Peace
―We think the text contains a lot of action… and if follow-up measures are taken, it will
indeed make a tremendous difference in generating positive global change.‖ – Sha
Zukang, Rio+20 SG, in defence of the outcome document
Page 11
He finished by saying that whether this will happen [follow-up action] remains a matter of
conjecture.
Plenary Reactions
Among some of the issues that were raised during plenary discussions included:
1. A participant wanted to know what has been done and achieved so far in line with the
Rio+20 implementations
2. Another participant wanted to know what African states have done to deal with the
pledges that were made citing that pledges were different from commitments; whether
there was a follow up mechanism to these pledges
3. Yet another participant indicated that this framework provides a chance for Africa to
develop herself through a sustainable development channel especially in dealing with
poverty eradication
In responding to these issues, Mr. Munetsi said that on matters to do with poverty eradication,
the was indeed in the courts of Africans themselves citing that it was going to be other states and
governments especially the International Community to deal with this matter on behalf of Africa.
Africa‘s Civil Society Organizations and Trade Unions were challenged to take this as a matter of
priority in their programming. He added that commitments need to be followed up and that
African governments should come up with a strategy that would enable them have a bargaining
power with the other communities especially the International Community.
A question that he posed that elicited debate was; ―Are CSOs spending energies enough and are
the proposals made being taken seriously?, Can a language that is clearly used be well understood
by Africa?. He indicated that it was among the CSOs and Trade Unions to determine the answers
to these questions but this has to be done in collaboration with the African governments.
Mitchelle Pressend from South Africa added that it was necessary that Africans use the spaces
available and reflect on what Vision we wish to take and take certain aspects that we feel are
diluted but are good for us. African governments must arise and block anything that they feel is
not facilitative enough such as a green capitalist economy. She indicated however that the
weakness is that both government and CSOs are not putting up what they want; that there were
no proposals whatsoever that these governments are willing to put up and use as tools of
negotiation. She wondered what African states are putting forward for returns of resources that
leave the continent to other places/ areas.
Bridget Mugambe from Uganda wondered why African states are being pushed towards SDGs
and from the trends of other International agreements, she was of the opinion that Africa needs
to look for her own solutions and her own means of achieving her own goals. She added that
Africa can be the creditor to the world.
George Ndungu from Kenya was of the opinion that from the presentation it looked like Africa
did not get what it wanted from Rio and that the EU shot down most of Africa‘s proposals for
what Africa wanted.
The responses for the above issues by Mr. Munetsi:
i. Africa needs to organize herself between now and the next major meeting so as to make
Africa‘s feelings known to the world
Page 12
ii. Africa can be the creditor to the world; Africa isn‘t poor, with plenty of resources and we
need to tap them through home grown solutions with the available resources
2.2. Presentation of the September 2012 AMCEN Meeting: what
recommendations to the AMCEN/African Union?, Joseph Mithika
Mwenda, Coordinator and African representative, UNEP MGSF, Pan
African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA)
2.2.1. Background of AMCEN
AMCEN provides guidance with respect to key regional policies and initiatives related to
the environment. AMCEN-14 was held in Arusha, Tanzania on 10 – 14 September 2012.
The session consisted of two meetings:
1. A meeting of the expert group held from 10 to 12 September
2. A ministerial segment held on 13 and 14 September.
AMCEN-14 was held soon after the Rio+20, and thus was meant to provide guidance to
the continent with respect to the implementation of key outcomes of Rio+20.
The main objective of the session, held under the theme ―Africa‘s post Rio+20 strategy
for sustainable development‖ was, ― to provide a platform for African ministers of the
environment to deliberate on substantive issues of importance to Africa as a follow-up to
the key outcomes of the Rio+20 summit‖
2.2.2. The Civil Society process
UNEP Regional Office for Africa partnered with PACJA to host a pre-AMCEN Africa Civil
Society Consultative Workshop on 7 – 9 September 2012
119 participants from 35 countries participated in the CSOs workshop
The aim of the CSOs workshop was to build consensus of key NGOs issues to be
submitted to AMCEN-14
CSOs also interrogated the AMCEN-14 agenda with a view of identifying key areas they
could input – in 2 segments
2.2.3. The CSOS recommendations to AMCEN
1. Concern about single focus on issues:
African governments should strengthen their engagement with various Multilateral Environment
Agreements negotiations such as CBD, CCD and UNFCCC not only on scientific knowledge but
also on Justice and human rights - gender; land ownership, food sovereignty in their efforts to
integrate the Conventions into national laws as well as national sustainable development and
poverty reduction strategies.
2. Bottom-up not top-down to issues:
Page 13
Governments should adopt a bottom-up participatory approach in designing of post-Rio Agenda.
―We are seeking to see the development of sustainable development goals that are realistic,
measurable and reportable and ensure that national consultative processes are held that are
characterized by broad based participation.‖, he said.
3. Harmony with Mother Nature vs ―Africa We Want.‖
He said that it is possible to eradicate poverty, hunger, and injustice in a sustainable manner that
will not disturb the harmony between nature and humanity; adding that this is possible if we
commit to work together – leaders and the citizens, local communities, civil society, private
sector and other relevant stakeholders to create the conditions and mechanisms that will
guarantee the fulfilment of the vision of the ―Africa We Want.‖
Mr. Mithika Mwenda finished his presentation by indicating that, ―life is a struggle and... Never
ever give up.‖
Plenary Discussions
The following issues were raised in plenary during the discussions on this presentation:
Mr. Kingsley Ofei from Gahana challenged the participants to stop agonizing and organize for
Africa. He added that Africa needs capacity building and also indicated that normally CSO
doesn‘t engage with the government and that moving forward; there was need for an open door
for engagement between African CSOs, Trade Unions and the governments. He wondered why
oil resources were getting discovered in most African countries yet African states were silent on
what this would mean especially regarding the talks about Green Economy.
Another participant wondered why Africa was recording lots of economic growth, yet
unemployment levels among the youth was amazingly increasing unimpressively?. How therefore
would we factor in jobs and livelihoods for the people?
Michelle Pressend: How does the CSO work on other things other than engaging and working
with governments?, among CSOs, there are capacity and resource issues, but we need to do more
work in our own countries so as to have them take recommendations that we can make to the
higher levels- ILO, WTO, UN etc. She added that CSOs need to get more organized as to hold
governments more accountable.
2.2.4. Responses from Mwenda:
Mr. Mwenda indicated that he would not adequately respond to all these issues but that he
would encourage various Civil Society Organizations and Trade Unions to do what they can to
ensure that Africa achieves what it wants, however, he said that engagement is quite a complex
issue, especially between various CSOs and the governments. ―Where do we have the space to
operate?, he wondered. He added that the contexts are different from one country to the other
for example in Kenya where CSO have come up loudly to speak on various isseues compared to
Ethiopia where CSOs do not have a voice. He encouraged the participants to treat various
countries differently and operate within their contexts. Making reference to the Friends of the
Page 14
Earth Network, he challenged participants to borrow a leaf from Germany and how the
organizations there collaborate in doing and achieving what they want.
A participant, Glenn wanted to know whether the outcomes of AMCEN are legally binding and
why did they have some meetings closed for CSOs and allow them to only participate in working
groups? He also wanted to know how CSOs and Trade Unions can improve their collaboration
with AMCEN?. He also advised that as much as AMCEN discusses sustainable development, there
was also need to have technical people on environment.
Mr. Mithika responded by indicating that AMCEN has had several engagement meetings in 2008
held in South Africa, 2009- Mali, 2010- Tanzania, which have made very good resolutions.
However, AMCEN is not a recognized organ at the AU; it is just a group of Ministers whose
outcomes depend on the willingness of the governments to take up and implement.
Afternoon Session: 212PM
The participants resumed at 1412Hrs. The session had two other presentations after which
participants went for working groups.
3.0. Afternoon Presentations
3.1. Expectations of African Civil Society Towards the Post 2015 Development
Agenda Post Rio+20 Meeting of Civil Society and Trade Unions in Africa;
Mwangi Waituru, Beyond 2015 Co-Chair; Seed Institute/GCAP Kenya
National Coordinator
Mwangi Waituru began his presentation by asking the participants to jot down what they think
the framework to be adopted should contain. Participants brainstormed in twos and thereafter,
the following responses were raised, that
3.1.1. The framework for Post 2015 should have:
i. A paradigm shift where the next framework should take on employment, job creation,
ii. be a framework that is consultative
iii. Follow up mechanism by both stakeholders – Governments and Civil Societies
iv. Inclusive , with all participating
v. A monitoring system within the framework
vi. Sustainability measures
vii. Bottom- Up approach and not as it has been Up- Bottom
viii. Priority areas by governments guided by outcome documents
In his presentation he asked whether the process through which MDGs were developed would be
repeated today?
3.1.2. The diagram below shows the process
Page 15
Referring to the political context, he indicated that the MDGs emerged at a time of relative
stability, prosperity and coherence. Western economies were on the rise, the G7 was a dominant
force in international diplomacy and consensus on development issues had been building
throughout the 1990s. The conditions were relatively good for forging agreement on global
targets for development. Today, in contrast, the financial crisis has rocked faith in long-
established economic thinking, international power has become more diffuse and multi-polar,
and climate change promises difficult times ahead. He added that this was a much more
challenging, complex and unpredictable context in which to negotiate an international
framework after 2015.
He indicated that the Group of Africa wide CSOs were coalescing to work on post MDGs and
that some of the activities they conducted include dialogues and round table discussions held in
Dakar, Nairobi, Addis and Monrovia. Other actions included a Presidential visit, meetings with
Amina Mohammed, breakfast with Betty Maina and other HLP members, Press release on the
HLP appointment and Women information brief. In addition, they had also held Two days
regional wide women‘s rights organisation consultation and Africa Wide Consultation on Post
2015.
6.1.3. Some of the fundamental questions emerging from these meetings included:
1. What is post 2015 framework for? Is it just to succeed MDGs? Create new power
relations? Address the solving of global problems facing us today or Redefine global
power relations?
2. Global goals or national goals? – (Key principles include ‗common but differentiated
responsibilities‘, ‗no one size fit all‘)
Page 16
3. How will the goals be financed? - (local mobilization of resources?)
4. A political break through outcome or another high level diplomatic document
5- The Question of reductionist/progressive realization Vs Elimination approach?
6- How do we achieve Integration/holistic approach without having fall-offs of important
issues or end up with one size fits all
7- Two strands (Set of SDGs and MDGs) Vs a single strand of an overarching framework
8- Develop a priority list or draw a collage
9- Bidding Vs Non- bidding framework
Mwangi made references to the Christmas tree, jigsaw or bullseye? A rough guide to post-2015
frameworks by Claire Melamed where he discussed three different frameworks:
1. The Christmas tree. Lots of people are lobbying for their particular issue to be given its
own goal
2. The Jigsaw. There‘s a second set of ideas which involves a framework organized
around a few core objectives, aimed at solving a number of big global problems
simultaneously
3. The Bullseye. This type of framework involves narrowing down the agenda even
more, and focusing on one single global problem
For references: http://generationdevelopment.org/christmas-tree-jigsaw-or-bullseye-a-rough-
guide-to-post-2015-frameworks/
3.1.3. UN Task Team‘s Post 2015 Development agenda proposed format
(as in the diagram below)
Page 17
Further, he also shared some of the findings of the UN Post 2015 report, which acknowledges the
highly interdependent nature of current global challenges and thus advocates for a new, more
holistic approaches to address them. Among the main recommendations included in the first
report include:
A vision for the future that rests on the core values of human rights, equality and
sustainability. An agenda format based on concrete end goals and targets organized along
four key dimensions of a more holistic approach such as (1) inclusive social development;
(2) inclusive economic development; (3) environmental sustainability; and (4) peace and
security.
To realize the future we want for all, a high degree of policy coherence at the global,
regional, national and sub-national levels will be required. Mwangi indicated that the
core set of ―development enablers‖ can be identified as a guide for such policy coherence.
He noted that in setting the agenda, it should be recognized that one size does not fit all. Hence,
the agenda should leave ample space for national policy design and adaptation to local settings,
but be guided by the overall vision and its underlying principles. The post-2015 UN development
agenda should be conceived as a truly global agenda with shared responsibilities for all countries.
Page 18
3.1.4. Priority list from the Nakuru CSOs meeting
(Good Governance)
1- Food Security and Agriculture
2- Health
3- Security
4- Education
5- Infrastructure
6- Environmental Sustainability
7- Poverty Reduction
8- Trade and Industrialization
9- Gender Equality
10-Empowerment of Vulnerable
Groups
1-Good governance
2-Agriculture
3-Health
4-Environmental conversation
5-Security
6-Technological development
7-Education
8-Infrustructure
9-Gender
10-Fair trade and Partnership
This list he said meant the following:
• live saving component
• A component of ensuring those above the poverty line remain above the poverty line
• a component of sustainability
3.1.5. Vision, Purpose and Principles of the Framework
On Vision, Purpose and Principles of the Framework, Mwangi was of the view that:
1. The ‗vision‘ that the whole framework should be working towards is that of a broader
state that we want the world to be in. Mwangi said that the framework would
contribute to the vision, but it does not have sole responsibility for bringing it about.
2. The ‗purpose‘ of the framework he said is the particular role that the framework has
which should describe exactly how the framework is going to contribute towards the
vision.
3. The framework should be designed in such a way so it can fully achieve this purpose
adding that the ‗principles‘ should underpin the whole framework and be reflected
Page 19
throughout its whole structure and also the ‗criterion‘ by which we can evaluate
proposed specific goals.
These he said must enable the CSOs to make a systematic assessment of whether a proposed goal
is a strong option for a post-2015 framework.
3.1.6. Section 2: Beyond 2015 Global Campaign
Beyond 2015 brings together more than 270 organisations from around 70 countries over the
world; 25 Africa, 22 Europe, 12 Americas and 10 from Asia-Pacific.
3.1.7. Influencing strategy 2012
2012 Key advocacy goals include:
The UN has initiated a strong, legitimate and inclusive process of post-2015 planning and
is leading this process.
Global civil society is supported to develop clear and coherent tasks.
Beyond 2015 is the connecting global campaign.
Rio +20 is a key milestone.
3.1.8. The aims of beyond 2015 Vision:
A global, overarching, cross-thematic framework post-2015
A participatory and inclusive process responsive to the voices of those affected by
poverty and injustice
Page 20
3.1.9. Beyond 2015 essential must-haves
Leadership
Legitimacy
Substance
Accountability
Beyond 2015 essential must- haves as discussed:
3.1.9.1. Leadership
He indicated that there was need to understand who leads, who owns and who implements?
Mwangi added that the UN is the only legitimate and representative global governance structure
and must lead the process. National governments must have primary ownership of, and
accountability for the framework and its delivery. Governments should make use of local
expertise, but must also be able to request external expertise without sacrificing control of their
development strategy, and international institutions must respect and support, as appropriate to
their mandate, existing national development frameworks.
3.1.9.2. Substance
The framework must address:
Root causes of poverty and injustice in all countries, from the richest to the poorest.
Inequity and inequality.
Environmental sustainability and climate change.
The responsibility of national governments to sustainably manage their natural and
financial resources.
The responsibility of the international community to support developing countries in the
face of global challenges through respecting their ODA commitments as well as through
innovative redistributive funding mechanisms which would generate additional predictive
finance.
The responsibility of developing country governments to deliver on development
commitments.
3.1.9.3. Legitimacy
The development of the framework must be based on a full and meaningful evaluation of
the MDGs and the Millennium Declaration, and must take into account the shortcomings
of the MDG approach and its limitations in addressing structural causes of poverty,
inequality and exclusion. It must also recognize the positive achievements of the MDGs.
The development of the framework must be completely open and transparent,
participatory, inclusive and responsive to voices and expertise of those directly affected
by poverty and injustice.
The framework must clearly lay out enforceable accountability mechanisms, as well as the
process for accountability at a national, regional and global level. This must include
national oversight and independent review mechanisms at the international level.
The framework must include mechanisms for mutual accountability between
governments and donors.
Page 21
The framework must include monitoring mechanisms with measures to disaggregate data
so that the impact on marginalized groups can be properly addressed.
3.1.10. Sustainable development Goals
Mwangi proposed that the SDGs should address the following key areas:
Commodity Markets and Policies
Poverty
Consumption
Demographic Dynamics &
Sustainability
Protecting and Promoting Human Health
Sustainable Human Settlement Development
Integrating Environment & Development in Decision-Making Climate Change Mitigation
and Adaption
Land resources, deforestation and desertification
Sustainable Agriculture & Food Security
Biological diversity Protection of the oceans and freshwater resources
He added that Colombia had proposed a set of SDGs as an input into the Rio+20 conference,
aiming to translate the Green Economy / Sustainable Development debate into tangible goals.
Page 22
The SDGs would be based on Agenda 21 given that it already maps requirements for sustainable
development. An example that he gave was the Colombian proposal which suggests a focus on
the following:
1. Reduce poverty -Improving living standards for the poor
2. Assure Adequate Food and Safe Water- Eradicating hunger; reducing obesity; and
ensuring safe water for drinking and sanitation.
3. Achieve Universal Literacy - Ensuring citizens have the basic skills to contribute to their
societies
4. Promote Healthier Lives - Reducing diseases and preventable deaths
5. Reduce Violence - Protecting citizens—particularly women, children and vulnerable
groups—from violence and the threat of violence
6. Promote Gender Equality -Empowering women and eliminating discrimination against
women and girls
7. Improve Environmental Sustainability -Ensuring better management of the earth‘s
limited resources
8. Achieve Universal Connectedness - Creating ties that bind
9. Improve Disaster Reduction& Crisis Management - Increasing capabilities to deal with
disasters and crises
10. Civil and Political Rights - fulfilling people‘s right to be politically active and engaged
in decision-making
11. Good and Equitable Global Governance - Ensuring fair participation, transparency and
accountability in international institutions
12. Equitable Economic Rules
On the other hand, Mwangi indicated that the human wellbeing on Post 2015 should address the
following:
Material living standards
Health
Education
Personal activities including work
Political voice and governance
Social connections and relationships
The present and future environment
Security, both economic and physical
For more information, he asked participants to visit the site: www.beyond2015.org.
3.2. The Post-2015 Development Agenda and alternative development models:
Structural transformation and sustainable development in Africa; David Owiro,
IEA
David compared the past development track records of Africa viz- a- viz the current economic
trends.
Economic growth was fast rising
Urban population growth was also on the rise
Page 23
The youth would form 30% of the population by 2050
Impact of global crisis was worse but African countries showed resilience
3.2.1. 4 types of economies
1. Weaker fundamentals; are economies that dependent on one commodity such as Angola,
Chad, DRC among others
2. Very strong economic fundamentals; that dependent on one commodity such as
Botswana, Cameroon, Algeria
3. Weaker fundamentals; those that have the potential of being strong but remain weak
such as Tanzania, Ghana, Ethiopia among others
4. Stronger fundamentals but less dependent on one commodity such as Tunisia, Kenya,
Uganda
David proposed that for a structural transformation and sustainable development to be realized
in Africa, there should be
less economic resources spent and used to increase output
Africa should aim at increasing the chart of GDP shares among its states
a clearly defined role of the state in Economic Development which should be aimed at
changing the lives of the African people
Effective integration requirements that should also aim at high standards- here he made
reference to Oxfam estimates on adaptation rates, some of which he said do not bring ou
very good stories for Africa
A clear negotiation between Africa and the International Community especially regarding
Africa‘s sources of energy and what Africa gets
Africa should not be blind to Global technological trends which could quickly facilitate its
economic development
On Policy options, he indicated that Africa has been more resilient to shocks in terms of
improved trade partnerships and increased fiscal balances. The Hibid Initiative should see to it
that debt levels are decreased. He added that politically, the economies are much more stable
than before due to policy frameworks that create subsidies for economic involvement and also a
favourable economic environment.
3.3. The Post-2015 Development Agenda and the Future We Want For All:
Entry points for Major Groups and Stakeholders Branch, Fatou Ndoye,
UNEP
The following were the major highlights of Fatou‘s presentation as background on the UNEP
engagement and stakeholder groups as follows:
In January 2012, Post-2015 UN System Task Team was established by the Secretary-
General according to the UN system report on Post-2015 Development Agenda (June
2012).
The High Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda was
appointed
Page 24
The HLP is expected to present its final report in May 2013.
In 2013, the UN General Assembly high level summit is expected to review progress of
the MDGs.
3.3.1. Below are diagrammatic presentations of the Post 2015 Process and
Post 2015 Agenda
Fatou added that:
There have been various National consultations at various levels
More are expected to be convened between May 2012 to the first quarter of 2013
These conventions are supposed to:
o ensure participation of all stakeholders:
o Facilitate the inclusion of voices of poor people and those that are vulnerable.
58 countries have been ear- marked for a representative sample across several dimensions
(regional, country typology, and different types of development challenges). Among the
African countries selected include: Angola, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Congo
DRC, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria,
Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia
These countries are supposed to undertake thematic consultations.
The UN Development Group has so far conducted 11 global thematic consultations.
Page 25
3.3.2. The Objectives of these consultations are to:
‗catalyze inclusive conversations and bottom-up feedback on the post-2015
Development Agenda‘
Facilitate an open dialogue
Review progress on MDGs
Discuss options for a new framework
3.3.3. The Cross-cutting elements identified include:
• Gender equality
• Young people
• Human rights
• Inequalities
• Global partnerships
• Water
• Inequalities
• Health
• Growth & Employment
• Governance
• Energy
• Education
• Population Dynamics
• Food security and nutrition
• Conflict & Fragility
• Environmental Sustainability
3.3.4. The following diagram represents the Environmental Sustainability
Thematic Consultation Roadmap
Page 26
3.3.5. Environmental Sustainability Thematic Consultation Timelines and
Key Milestones
Further information, she asked the participants to visit the following sites:
www.worldwewant2015.org
Post 2015 National Consultations Guidelines:
www.undg.org/docs/12532/POST%202015%20-%20ENGLISH%20-%20July%2008.pdf
Beyond 2015 CSO Campaign: www.beyond2015.org
ODI Blog: http://post2015.org/
UN Post 2015 Task Team Orientation Report:
www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Poverty%20Reduction/Realizing%20the%20f
uture%20we%20want.pdf
4.0. WORKING GROUPS
After these presentations, participants were asked to form two groups that would make up the
working groups that would generate the key recommendations and establish a position/
messages/ declaration of the CSOs and Trade Unions on Rio+20. The broad question to all the
working groups was: From ―The Future We Want‖ to the ―Post-2015 development framework:
what matters for Africa, for African civil society?‖
Page 27
The working groups were expected to discuss and agree on recommendations/messages for
African Decision Makers on:
A. the implementation of the Rio + 20 outcomes facilitated by Munetsi Madakufamba,
SARDC and
B. the inter-linkages and synergies between the post Rio+20 and the post-2015 development
framework; facilitated by Mwangi Waituru, Beyond 2015.
Each working group had a facilitator and a Rapporteur who were also part of a drafting team
that finalised the key messages of the meeting.
DAY 11: 20
th November 2012
The day began with the delegates proceeding with the working groups. It was meant to
concentrate on the topic of Strengthening Civil Society participation in UNEP‘s work in Africa. In
parallel was the drafting team meeting which was expected to generate the Outcome Document
of the meeting.
This session was facilitated by Gertrude Ngenda, UNEP, and also featured a presentation on
UNEP‘s work in the region. Delegates then discussed potential opportunities for continuous
engagement with UNEP at the regional level.
4.1. Gertrude Ngenda‘s presentation on UNEP‘s work in the region.
The Medium Term Strategy (MTS) 2010-2013 defines the vision of UNEP to be:
A leading global env. Authority that sets a the env. Agenda, promotes coherent
implemetation of the env. Dimension of SD within the UN system and is the
authoritative advocate for the Global Env.
Significally enhances UNEP‘s capacity to deliver on the Bali Strategic Plan for
Technology and Capacity Building
Further embracing UNEP‘s role as the Environment programme of the United
Nations
Ensues UNEP‘s intertventions are foundaed on Sound Technology and science
Fully implemeting results based management
Enables UNEP to deliver its mandate effectively
And make a transformative difference
4.1.1. UNEP PROGRAMME OF WORK (PoW)
Includes 6 sub programmes that align with the MTS cross-cutting thematic priorities (2010 -2013)
from:
1. Early warning and assessment
2. Environmental law and conventions
3. Environmental Policy and Implementation
4. Technology, Industry and Economics
5. Regional Cooperation and Coordination
6. Communication and Public Information
Page 28
4.1.2. Regional Office for Africa
One of the 5 UNEP Regional Offices
ROA, ROE, RONA, ROAP, ROWA
Headed by the Regional Director, Deputy – Director Has
Technical Experts each heading a Sub programmes
Sub Regional Coordinators – Five Regional Blocs
Delivering as One – Coordination and Communication Team
Partnerships and Resource Mobilization Coordination
2 Conventions (Abidjan & Nairobi) on marine and Coastal Management & Africa SIDS
MEA Focal points (CBD, UNFCCC, UNCCD etc.,)
Poverty and Environment Programme (PEI) and Kenya Country Programme
Has been strengthened based on a GC Decision
4.1.3. UNEP‘s activities in Africa
Activities are within the MTS Six Thematic Priority Areas (CC, EMS,EG,HS&HW, RE and
the Regional Office Specific
o Programmatic (ROA specific) incharge of:
Communication and Outreach
Poverty and Environment Initiative – Africa
Kenya Country Programme
Other activities include Ministerial position for AMCEN where UNEP is the Secretariat,
AMCOW, HESA, FEMA, MEPF, RCM, GGW, AU / NEPAD, GEI, CSD processes (RIO+20)
Mandate to work in African Countries = demand driven interventions on Climate
Change
Integration of Climate Change responses into Regional, Sub Regional and National
Development Processes
Focusing on Ecosystems Based Adaptation on highly vulnerable ecosystems to reduce
vulnerability & build resilience (mega deltas, dry-lands, low lying coastal areas)
Clean Technology – Financing for cleaner energy goods & services
Reducing Emissions – sound policies, REDD+, renewable & efficient / alternative
technologies,
Supporting CDM, Cleaner fuel – lead phase out and sulphur reduction in fuels
Non-motorised transport
Comprehensive communication & outreach
Support to National level processes (UNCT/UNDAF) etc
Support to AMCEN Climate Change Programme
Support to the African Negotiations / Negotiators on CC for a Common African Position.
Framework of Climate Change programmes for the five Sub Regional Blocks
African processes on developing climate change frameworks made gender responsive.
Comprehensive CC Programme for Africa including Communication and Outreach
Strategy
Technical Support to the countries during the COP‘s
Partnership building
Page 29
4.1.4. Disaster Management
Minimizing threats to human well being from the impacts of natural and human made disasters
and conflicts
Risk assessment to inform and guide policy & planning on key environmental risks and
threats
Disaster & conflict prevention for mitigation measures
Early warning on environmental risks of disasters
Strategies to inform national and Regional strategies
Mitigating for possible impacts
Environmental Cooperation and Peace building
Environmental diplomacy
Sustainable buildings and Construction
4.1.5. Ecosystem Management (EMS)
Ensuring the holistic management of land, water and living resources to promote conservation
and sustainable use
Focus on countries with rich biodiversity (Forests, mountains, Parks), high water stress
(Lakes and River Basins), recurrent food shortages (Dry lands) & the socio economy
of ecosystems
Productivity of the Ecosystems – Food Security
Mainly trans boundary ecosystems
Facilitate policy to promote Environment for development &
Biodiversity as a functioning system
CB for testing tools and methodologies
Provides technical support to the African Ministers Council on Water (AMCOW)
Support to Sub Regional /National Level processes
4.1.6. Environmental Governance (EG)
Strengthening global, regional, national and local environmental governance to address agreed
environmental priorities
Provides environmental information to governments for Decisions making
Guidance in translation of International conventions, formulation of laws & regulations
Enhancement of Global and Regional Environmental Cooperation
CB in the strengthening of processes, laws and institutions (Judiciary, police etc)
Brings environmental trends to the attention of policy makers (Atlases, EO‘s, Alerts,
Indicators)
Creates &maintains scientific networks and outreach
Support to Ministerial Fora, Policy dialogues with MGS
Supports the GC/ GMEF, Negotiators and Negotiations
Support to Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs)
One UN and UNDAF processes
4.1.7. Harmful Substances and Hazardous Wastes (HS &HW)
Minimising the impact of harmful substances and hazardous waste on the environment and
people
Page 30
Provides support in Institutional Strengthening of various countries to effectively
implement Montreal Protocol Activities through creation and management of National
Ozone Units. Twenty eight (52) in Africa
Assists countries develop and implement Terminal Phase out Management Plans (TPMP)
for major Ozone Depleting Substances resulting in most African achieving total phase out
of CFCs, Halons and CTCs (solvents)
Assists countries to prepare plans to accelerate the phase out of HCFC in line with
decision of the Meeting of the Parties to Montreal Protocol (freeze in imports and
consumption of HCFC by 1st January 2013 and further 10% reduction by 2015
Secretariat to SAICM, Mercury and OZONE and supports national implementation of
associated programmes
Facilitates access to International finance
Conducts Scientific assessments & analysis to inform policy and create awareness
Facilitates development and adoption of technologies for disposal & management of
HS&HW and builds national capacity
Strengthened cooperation and collaboration with sub-regional organisations and other
international organisations – Hosts the HESA initiative
4.1.8. Resource Efficiency (Sustainable Consumption & Production)
Reducing the adverse environmental impacts of producing, processing and using goods and
services
Assessments to strengthen the scientific base & assess trends on how resources are used in
the global economy.
Strengthening & communicating knowledge for RE & SCP
Support to National/local SCP programmes and action plans
Support to the Cleaner Production Centres
Extending partnerships with Industry & businesses for Cleaner Production
Various activities under the Marrakech Task Forces
Facilitation of Regional Processes on SCP - CSD, ARSCP,
Mobilisation of Private Sector to Support SCP
Facilitation of the implementation of the Green Economy Initiative in Africa
Development of tools to advance the RE agenda in Africa
Exchange of information and Best Practices
4.1.9. Programmatic (ROA) Communication and Outreach
Development and implementation of the Awareness and Outreach Activities
Development and implementation of Communication Strategies for the
Ministerial Forums
Contribution towards visibility and media related aspects of the Ministerial
Forums
Develops Capacity Building workshops for journalists
Implementation of outreach activities involving major groups
Production of awareness materials
Outreach and Awareness activities for Major Events (World Environment Day,
Ozone, Water etc
Manages the ROA Website and Databases, publications
Page 31
Undertakes the Public information for the Regional Office
4.1.10. Programmatic (ROA) Kenya Country Programme (as an Example)
Kenya Country Programme undertakes UNEP‘s activities at the Kenya National level in all the
Programme areas
Engages and collaborates with Government ministries departments & MGS on
topical issues e.g. development of national climate change and adaptation strategy
Enhances UNEP‘s visibility at International Forums i.e International Biodiversity
Day, World Environmental Day and World water Day and other key events
Provides technical inputs into the MTIF, the work of the UNCT and the
Environment Donor Coordination Group forum to address Env issues i.e. climate
change, forest rehabilitation and restoration of the Nairobi river.
Facilitated the Mau Dialogue
Participation in the Kenya One UN Programme & the UNCT
Participation in MGS activities at national level
4.1.11. AMCEN Flagships
Approved at the last AMCEN Meeting
Currently being developed and refined in consultation with the AU/NEPAD and the ECA
UNEP will give the technical support to the flagship programmes
Will be aligned with the NEPAD EAP and the Africa Environment Platform
Will also be aligned to the UNEP thematic areas, AUC and those areas identified by the
various processes
4.1.12. Partnerships with MGS
UNEP has developed strategic partnerships with key organizations
UN agencies, Bilaterals and Multilaterals, CSO‘s, Private Sector, Educational Institutions,
Governmental and Non- governmental agencies
At various levels International, Regional, sub regional, National and Sub national
to ensure a continuous involvement of Partners (MGS) including CSO in shaping UNEP‘s
policies and programmes
To ensure the full and effective engagement in Africa‘s environmental agenda through the
African Regional Major Groups and Stakeholders Consultative meetings (RCMs)
RCM‘s provide a platform for exchange and consultation among civil society on key
environmental issues, in preparation for UNEP‘s Sessions of the Governing Council /
Global Ministerial Environment Forum;
and the Major Groups' contribution to the GMSF
4.1.13. How Major Groups and Stakeholders Collaborate with UNEP
Opportunities for resource mobilization at country level increasing, as some governments
& other donors have decentralized decision-making on allocation of funding to country
regional level activities
Assisting with priority setting during programme formulation at GC and through
Ministerial Fora
Page 32
Directing policy at national, regional and Global level through the GC/ GMEF, GMGSF
and RCMs
Assist in Promoting synergy and coherence in the UNEP Programmes and other UNEP
activities at the various levels
Complementarities with the work of other UN agencies at Country level i.e. UNDP in
many African countries
4.1.14. How Major Groups and Stakeholders Collaborate with UNEP
Outreach and awareness of UNEP‘s PoW & activities
Directing policy at national, sub regional and Regional level (National Chapters, REC‘s,
NEPAD, AUC, UNECA, Ministerial For a, Intergovernmental Processes)
Fundraising through National Processes ( MGS national Chapters and UNEP national focal
points etc)
Membership to the various UNEP Scientific bodies and committees (SC,
SBSTTA,SBSTA,ATRP, IPSRM etc)
Assist with creating partnership with other Implementing Agencies in the countries to
increase the impact of UNEP‘s activities.
Assistance with enhancing the Political Capital and information sharing with MGS
organisations
Outreach and awareness of the work of UNEP at key forums
Brokering knowledge and Gap Filling
5.0. GROUP PRESENTATIONS
This session marked the reports from the Working Groups which were expected to discuss and
agree on recommendations/messages for African Decision Makers on the following topics:
1. the implementation of the Rio + 20 outcomes facilitated by Munetsi Madakufamba,
SARDC and
2. the inter-linkages and synergies between the post Rio+20 and the post-2015
development framework; facilitated by Mwangi Waituru, Beyond 2015.
5.1. Group One Presentation
In respect of Rio+20 (―The Future We Want‖ outcomes document) the group noted that:
1.1. ―The Future We Want‖ fell short of commitments for action in respect of Africa and the
needs and demands of Africa‘s people, as reflected in paragraph 184., which records
Africa‘s progress but fails to articulate any specific, time-bound or measurable actions in
support of these efforts being undertaken by Africa;
1.2. The reference to ―Green Economy‖ (paragraph 56.) fails to meaningfully engage with the
proposals for a just and equitable development system, based on the principles contained
in the Rio 1992 Declaration.
1.3. The undertaking to create an enabling environment for technology transfer and
―international cooperation to promote investment in science, innovation and technology
for sustainable development‖, as well as recognising the importance of ―strengthened
national, scientific and technological capacities‖;
Page 33
1.4. The process to establish an intergovernmental process under the auspices of the General
Assembly to assess financing needs and frameworks, which however repeats other similar
processes and fails to provide significant implementation of the 0.7% funding
commitments for ODA;
1.5. Paragraph 277. Refers to ―Capacity Building‖ without sufficient recognition of the
limitations and barriers that exist for effective implementation, which extends beyond the
scope of ―capacity building‖. Much of the ―capacity building‖ is ineffective and
inappropriate, reinforcing and strengthening the systemic and structural limitations to
implementation;
1.6. Good governance is widely referred to throughout the text. In absence of good
governance architecture for sustainable development at global, regional and national
level effective implementation of the three pillars remains difficult.
In respect of the MDGs and Post-2015 Development Agenda, they noted that:
1. MDG‘s wasn‘t Africans countries idea‘s;
2. The MDGs had a positive impact on the poor in Africa in terms of focused global attention
and mobilizing resources on the most pressing development needs such maternal health and
child mortality. None-the-less, the discourse was marred with shortcomings that range from a
reductionist nature of the set of goals to a lack of participation in their development.
3. Cases of success are matched with higher cases of failure on MDGs across different groups,
countries, targets, etc
4. The populations they work with have taught them that they do not want hand-outs, they
want an opportunity to enjoy a decent life of dignity for themselves. They are calling for a
framework that will change the rules of the game.
5. Hence, in reflecting on the linkage between Post Rio and Post MDGs, they took note of the
following issues;
1) Concerned that Africa is disillusioned by decades of Broken Promises during which the
leaders, governments and institutions of the world have failed the planet and its people; a
failure that is endemic and chronic, continuous and entrenched in the operations and
activities of world leaders and global institutions where fear, cowardice and short-term
expediency overwhelms‘ our leaders;
2) Aware that lack of accountable and good governance at both the national and
international levels remains a major stumbling block to achieving the commitments and
targets of both the Rio and MDG agenda‘s.
3) And angered by the fact that, though the notion of participation of the vulnerable
groups, youth, minorities woman and marginalized groups and the population at large
has been widely accepted, it is only partially and mechanically implemented both at the
international and national levels. Without people‘s participation developmental outcomes
will always be viewed as imposed from above and consequently not enjoy the full
confidence of people on the ground.
4) Observing that the obsession with growth as measured by GDP growth results in
inequitable, skewed and environmentally harmful development, a type of growth which
undermines the rights of people, and in particular vulnerable groups such as local
communities and indigenous peoples.
5) Being aware that multiple crises (finance, environment, food security) are undermining
communities‘ livelihoods and capacity to adjust to climate change, and that a minimum of
social protection for the greater majority of citizens is not yet guaranteed.
Page 34
6) Realizing that lack of financial commitments by the developed countries has undermined
the achievement of MDGs and Agenda 21 and implementation at the national level.
7) Insisting that in terms of Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration access to public information
and information sharing is essential to the implementation of National Sustainable
Development Plans, which are continuously ignored by most States.
8) Being concerned that traditional, indigenous and local knowledge are increasingly under
threat by inappropriate and harmful technological practices and dumping of excess
capacity of industrialised countries, e.g. ―green piracy‖, carbon trading, genetically
modified seeds and products, industrial pesticides and fertilizers, which in effect reduce
traditional and indigenous knowledge and practices.
Recommendations:-
The following were their recommendations:
1) They debated between a no-framework at all situation and concluded that there is a need
for a single over-arching global framework whose vision is transformative change towards
inclusive, people centred sustainable development. The people and the planet must be on
the centre of this vision.
2) They recommended a merger of the post Rio and the post MDGs process into a single
strand. The two processes must not run parallel as this may risk creating policicy
duplication, contradictions and overall policy incoherence. This will give us coherence
between global and international policies.
3) Employment generation: There should be a paradigm shift from the common concept of
development and growth people focused development is that which brings food and
empowers the citizens so employment and decent work should be the focus of sustainable
development and green economy. This goal engineers realistic decisions making it
egalitarian sustainable. This approach solves security concerns addresses social
responsibilities and priorities development of industries, public work surfaces as catalyst
of job creation
4) Minimum Platform of Social Protection: We recommend a minimum platform of social
protection. To save the planet it is necessary for people to have minimum level of life
reflected in a core minimum of social protection of all people and a living wage for all
those who are employed.
5) Implementation of ―Declaration of African Civil Society Organisations and Trade Unions
on Rio+20 Conference in June 2012‖: They made a call on the Rio+20 conference to
support a people centered green economy that respects human rights and upholds the Rio
1992 principle (polluter pays, precautionary , and common but differentiated
responsibility), promoting the well-being of citizens based on equitable development,
fairness, justice, safety and security for the common good, and benefits for all living
beings on this planet and that recognises the intrinsic value of ecological systems that
supports present and future generations.
6) Good Governance: Establish good governance at a global and national level as a corner
stone on all development frameworks to promote integrated decision making to fill the
Page 35
implementation gap and promote coherence across institutions and ensure stronger
participatory decision making process.
7) Binding and enforceable mechanism: Domestication of all binding and enforceable
mechanisms especially those which protects rights, including legal provisions and their
effective implementation. Also policies and encouraging acceptance of gender equality as
part of social norms and behaviours, reducing of gender inequalities in labour markets
and access to productive resources, protecting of reproductive rights and improving access
to good quality, health and education services and social protection.
8) ICSECR implemented by 2015
9) Enabling environment for people‘s participation and access to information
10) Implement New Tax regime to finance commitments: Financial Transaction Tax &
Extractive Industries Tax
5.2. Group Two: Inter-linkgages and synergies between Rio +20 and Post 2015
development framework
In respect of Rio+20 (―The Future We Want‖ outcomes document), they noted that:
(Reported as presented by the team):
1. ―The Future We Want‖ fell short of commitments for action in respect of Africa and the
needs and demands of Africa‘s people, as reflected in paragraph 184., which records
Africa‘s progress but fails to articulate any specific, time-bound or measurable actions in
support of these efforts being undertaken by Africa;
2. The reference to ―Green Economy‖ (paragraph 56.) fails to meaningfully engage with the
proposals for a just and equitable development system, based on the principles contained
in the Rio 1992 Declaration.
3. The undertaking to create an enabling environment for technology transfer and
―international cooperation to promote investment in science, innovation and technology
for sustainable development‖, as well as recognising the importance of ―strengthened
national, scientific and technological capacities‖;
4. The process to establish an intergovernmental process under the auspices of the General
Assembly to assess financing needs and frameworks, which however repeats other similar
processes and fails to provide significant implementation of the 0.7% funding
commitments for ODA;
5. Paragraph 277. Refers to ―Capacity Building‖ without sufficient recognition of the
limitations and barriers that exist for effective implementation, which extends beyond the
scope of ―capacity building‖. Much of the ―capacity building‖ is ineffective and
inappropriate, reinforcing and strengthening the systemic and structural limitations to
implementation;
6. Good governance is widely referred to throughout the text. In absence of a good
governance architecture for sustainable development at global, regional and national
level effective implementation of the three pillars remains difficult.
In respect of the MDGs and Post-2015 Development Agenda, the group opined as follows:
1. MDG‘s wasn‘t Africans countries idea‘s;
Page 36
2. The MDGs had a positive impact on the poor in Africa in terms of focused global attention
and mobilizing resources on the most pressing development needs such maternal health and
child mortality. None-the-less, the discourse was marred with shortcomings that range from a
reductionist nature of the set of goals to a lack of participation in their development.
3. Cases of success are matched with higher cases of failure on MDGs across different groups,
countries, targets, etc
4. The populations we work with have taught us that they do not want hand-outs, they want
an opportunity to enjoy a decent life of dignity for themselves. They are calling for a
framework that will change the rules of the game.
5. Hence, in reflecting on the linkage between Post Rio and Post MDGs, we take note of the
following issues;
At the end of the two- day deliberations, the following statement was deliberated upon and all
the delegates agreed on it as a communiqué of the Africa CSOs and Trade Unions regarding
Rio+20:
Statement by African Civil Society & Trade Unions: Rio+20/Post 2015 MDG Processes
Preamble
Poverty and inequality remain Africa‘s biggest challenges despite the economic growth that has
been enjoyed by most of the countries on the continent over the last decade. African countries
need sustainable structural transformation, beyond simple economic growth based on global
coordination and cooperation and a solidarity economy, to create and increase jobs and to
create conditions for better governance and ultimately sustainable development.
Africa‘s development and achievements over the last decade has seen the active and growing
involvement of civil society and trade unions, giving voice to peoples needs. As trade unions and
civil society we gathered in Nairobi, on the 19 & 20th November 2012, to review and assess the
outcomes and processes related to Post-Rio+20 and the Post-2015 MDG‘s Agenda.
Key Issues
1. The high hopes and expectations of peoples of Africa in the Rio+20 outcomes have not
been realised. Africa is disillusioned by decades of Broken Promises during which the
leaders, governments and institutions of the world have failed the planet and its people; a
failure that is endemic and chronic, continuous and entrenched in the operations and
activities of world leaders and global institutions;
Page 37
2. The world we want is a low carbon economy founded on new patterns of production,
distribution and consumption allowing for the needs of all in society to be met. We
observe that the obsession with growth as measured by GDP results in inequitable,
skewed and environmentally harmful development, a type of growth which undermines
the rights of people, and in particular vulnerable groups such as local communities and
indigenous peoples.
3. We are aware that the lack of accountability and good governance at both the national
and international levels remains a major stumbling block to achieving the commitments
and targets of both the Rio and MDG agenda‘s;
4. Without peoples participation developmental outcomes will always be viewed as
imposed from above and consequently not enjoy the full confidence of people on the
ground;
5. We are aware that multiple crises (finance, environment, food security, water) are
undermining communities‘ livelihoods and capacity to adjust to climate change, and that
a minimum of social protection for the greater majority of citizens is not yet guaranteed;
6. We realise that the lack of financial commitments by the developed countries has
undermined the achievement of MDGs and Agenda 21 and their implementation at the
national level. The financial resources for the world we want must be raised from the rich
and industrialised, based on the affirmed Rio Principles (1992);
7. We insist that Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on access to information, public
participation and access to justice in environmental matters is essential to the
implementation of National Sustainable Development Plans;
8. We are concerned that traditional, indigenous and local knowledge are increasingly under
threat from inappropriate and harmful technological practices and dumping of excess
capacity/technology by industrialised countries, e.g. carbon trading, genetically modified
seeds and products, industrial pesticides and fertilizers, which in effect reduce traditional
and indigenous knowledge and practices.
Recommendations:-
As Civil Society and Trade Union We Recommend:
11) the establishment of a credible Institutional Framework for the delivery of Sustainable
Development, which re-articulates the principles underpinning the quest for a sustainable
and just world;
Page 38
12) a merger of the post-Rio+20 (SDGs) and the post-MDGs process into a single strand. The
two processes must not run parallel as this may risk creating policy duplication,
contradictions and overall policy incoherence;
13) the adoption of social protection floor for all people and a living wage for all those who
are employed;
14) that the following definition of ―green economy‖ be adopted by the institutions tasked
with implementing Ri0+20 outcomes and the Post-2015 MDG processes:
―… a people-centred green economy that respects human rights and upholds the Rio 1992
principle (polluter pays, precautionary, and common but differentiated responsibility),
promoting the well-being of people based on equitable development, fairness, justice,
safety and security for the common good, and benefits for all living beings on this planet
and that recognises the intrinsic value of ecological systems that supports present and
future generations.‖
15) that in the operationalisation and implementation of the ―green economy‖ concept
special attention is paid to the following:
5.1 the importance of agriculture in the lives of the people in Africa and that peoples
control over farming systems must be built;
5.2 the control by corporations over land, agricultural inputs and markets must be
limited;
5.3 the green economy is a transitional strategy for industrial development in Africa;
5.4 public goods must be treated as entitlements whose enjoyment cannot be constrained
by the limited financial means of individuals or communities;
5.5 education, health, water, public transport and energy are the key public goods whose
production and distribution must actively involve the people themselves.
16) the establishment of good governance at a global and national level, as a corner stone of
all development frameworks, to promote integrated decision making, to fill the
implementation gap and promote coherence across institutions and ensure stronger
participatory decision making process.
17) the domestication of all binding and enforceable mechanisms especially those which
protect rights, and their effective implementation and that ICSECR1 implemented by 2015;
18) the implementation of New Tax regimes to finance commitments, namely, the Financial
Transaction Tax and progressive taxation on the wealthy and corporations, particularly
Extractive Industries to finance sustainable development for Africa.
1
Page 39
We need a paradigm shift to sustainable inclusive development that is people-centred and
economically inclusive and guarantees equitable distribution of wealth and job creation.
6.0. CONCLUSION
The delegates felt that this was a very worthwhile meeting with very fruitful deliberations. It was
hoped that that these deliberations would provide an indication of recipient needs and
challenges, which should continue to be addressed in discussion with donor partners to create
stronger, more effective projects and partnerships. There was also general consensus that this
meeting should be the beginning of a more comprehensive process towards closer cooperation in
the Rio+20 processes and engagement with African Civil Society Organizations and Trade
Unions.
P
Delegates pose for a group photo at the end of the two- day meeting.