MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP The Regional Planning Technical Working Group may take action on any item appearing on this agenda. Thursday, February 8, 2018 – Special Focus on Regional Housing and Forecast Issues 12:30 to 3:15 p.m.* (A light lunch will be provided. RSVPs are requested.) *Note earlier start time to accommodate “Meet and Greet” event with the California Department of Housing and Community Development. SANDAG, 7th Floor Conference Room 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 Please take the elevator to the 8th floor to access the meeting room. Staff Contacts: Carolina Ilic (619) 699-1989 [email protected]AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS • MEET AND GREET WITH MEGAN KIRKEBY FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT DETERMINATION • SENATE BILL 35 IMPLEMENTATION • REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLE LEGISLATION PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus; makes strategic plans; obtains and allocates resources; plans, engineers, and builds public transit; and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the region's quality of life.
64
Embed
Meeting Notice and Agenda - sandag.org · name and meeting date, agenda item, your name, and your organization. Any comments, handouts, presentations, or other materials from the
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
MEETING NOTICEAND AGENDAREGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUPThe Regional Planning Technical Working Group may take action on any item appearing on this agenda.
Thursday, February 8, 2018 – Special Focus on Regional Housing and Forecast Issues
12:30 to 3:15 p.m.* (A light lunch will be provided. RSVPs are requested.)
*Note earlier start time to accommodate “Meet and Greet” event with theCalifornia Department of Housing and Community Development.
SANDAG, 7th Floor Conference Room 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101
Please take the elevator to the 8th floor to access the meeting room.
• MEET AND GREET WITH MEGAN KIRKEBY FROM THECALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT
• REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT DETERMINATION
• SENATE BILL 35 IMPLEMENTATION
• REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ANDNEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLE LEGISLATION
PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING
MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional
decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus; makes strategic plans; obtains and allocates resources;
plans, engineers, and builds public transit; and provides information on a broad range of topics
pertinent to the region's quality of life.
2
Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Working Group on any item at the time the Working Group is considering the item. Please complete a Request to Comment form and then present the form to the Working Group coordinator. Members of the public may address the Working Group on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person unless otherwise directed by the Chair. The Working Group may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.
Both agenda and non-agenda comments should be sent to SANDAG via [email protected]. Please include the Working Group name and meeting date, agenda item, your name, and your organization. Any comments, handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Working Group meeting should be received by the Working Group coordinator no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting. All public comments and materials received by the deadline become part of the official project record, will be provided to the members for their review at the meeting, and will be posted to the agenda file as a part of the handouts following each meeting.
In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at www.sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for e-notifications via our e-distribution list either at the SANDAG website or by sending an email request [email protected].
SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints, and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to the SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or [email protected]. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900 or (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.
SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request, call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión.
如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言.
请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求.
SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or visit 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices. To access the meeting room,
please arrive on the 8th floor.
3
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP Thursday, February 8, 2018
ITEM NO. RECOMMENDATION
1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Estimated Start Time: 12:30 p.m.
2. MEET AND GREET WITH MEGAN KIRKEBY FROM THE CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
INFORMATION
SANDAG is commencing its next Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA)cycle. Megan Kirkeby will serve as the California Department of Housing andCommunity Development (HCD) liaison to SANDAG on the RHNA.Ms. Kirkeby will introduce herself, discuss work that HCD is undertaking, anddiscuss local and regional housing issues that members of the Regional PlanningTechnical Working Group (TWG) would like to share.
Estimated Start Time: 12:35 p.m.
REPORTS
3. REGIONAL GROWTH FORECAST: FINAL SERIES 14 CAPACITY BYJURISDICTION (Rachel Cortes and Adam Attar)
INFORMATION
Staff will present the final housing unit capacity by jurisdiction, which will beused as the basis for the Series 14 Regional Growth Forecast.
As the first step in the RHNA process, HCD will provide SANDAG with a draftRHNA Determination, which includes the number of housing units needed tomeet the projected growth in the San Diego region from 2021 to 2028.SANDAG and HCD staff will discuss the draft RHNA Determination, outline thecalculations used in the determination, solicit feedback from the TWG on theupcoming consultation with HCD, and maintain dialogue on the RHNA processwith the SANDAG Regional Planning Committee and Board of Directors.
Estimated Start Time: 1:15 p.m.
+5. SENATE BILL 35 IMPLEMENTATION (Megan Kirkeby, HCD) INFORMATION
Megan Kirkeby, HCD, will present the TWG with an overview of a draft guidanceon Senate Bill 35 (Wiener, 2017), including a calculation of each jurisdiction'sprogress on meeting its RHNA targets.
Estimated Start Time: 1:35 p.m.
4
+6. INPUT FOR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LISTENING SESSIONS (Seth Litchney)
INFORMATION
HCD will be holding Listening Sessions in Sacramento during the month
of February to receive input on the implementation of 2017 housing legislation.
TWG members are asked to provide comments in response to the
following questions:
1. How can new planning grants in the first year of Senate Bill 2 (Atkins, 2017)
be used to lay a foundation for accelerated housing production in the
jurisdictions that receive them?
2. What can HCD do to support local governments adapting to the requirements
of recent streamlining legislation – Senate Bill 35 (Wiener, 2017) in particular
– and what can HCD do to encourage more jurisdictions to opt in?
3. How can HCD take on its expanded enforcement role to ensure local
governments are approving housing projects consistent with their own
local plans?
Estimated Start Time: 2 p.m.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the
TWG on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda.
Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a Request to
Comment form and giving it to the meeting coordinator prior to speaking.
Public speakers should notify the meeting coordinator if they have a handout
for distribution to TWG members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes
or less per person. TWG members also may provide information and
announcements under this agenda item.
Estimated Start Time: 2:15 p.m.
+8. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES APPROVE
+8A. The TWG is asked to review and approve the minutes from
its November 9, 2017, joint meeting with the Regional Energy
Working Group.
+8B. The TWG is asked to review and approve the minutes from
its November 9, 2017, meeting.
+8C. The TWG is asked to review and approve the minutes from
its December 14, 2017, meeting.
Estimated Start Time: 2:20 p.m.
5
+9. 2018 MEETING SCHEDULE, MEMBERSHIP ROSTER, FORM 700, AND VICE CHAIR ELECTIONS (Carolina Ilic)
INFORMATION
Meeting Schedule: The TWG generally meets the second Thursday of every month from 1:15 to 3:15 p.m.
Membership Roster and Form 700: TWG members and alternates included on the Membership Roster are required to fill out Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests. Form 700 instructions will be emailed to TWG members listed on the Membership Roster. Updates/corrections to the Membership Roster should be forwarded to SANDAG staff.
Vice Chair Elections: Elections for a new Vice Chair will be held at the April TWG meeting.
Estimated Start Time: 2:25 p.m.
+10. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP CHARTER (Carolina Ilic)
RECOMMENDATION
In an effort to more comprehensively describe the TWG's responsibilities regarding development and implementation of San Diego Forward: The 2019-2050 Regional Plan, the TWG is asked to discuss and recommend potential amendments to its Charter. A revised Charter will be presented to the Regional Planning Committee for approval in March.
Estimated Start Time: 2:30 p.m.
11. 2018 CALIFORNIA CHAPTER AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE IN SAN DIEGO (Carey Fernandes, 2018 American Planning Association California Conference Co-Chair)
INFORMATION
The 2018 American Planning Association (APA) California Conference will be held in San Diego from October 7-10, 2018, at the Sheraton Inn on Harbor Island, with an opening reception at the USS Midway. Planning for the conference is well underway. The success of the conference will rely on several factors, including active participation by local planners and agencies. The Conference Host Committee encourages TWG members and local planning staffs to get involved. Carey Fernandes, 2018 APA California Conference Co-Chair, will provide examples of how local planners can be engaged in the conference.
Estimated Start Time: 2:40 p.m.
12. SAN DIEGO AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION AWARD NOMINATIONS (Mike Strong, City of Escondido and San Diego American Planning Association Awards Chair)
INFORMATION
The deadline to submit award nominations to the San Diego Section of the American Planning Association is March 11, 2018. TWG members are encouraged to submit nominations. Learn more about the nomination process at sdapa.org.
+13. REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLE LEGISLATION (Marisa Mangan and Antoinette Meier)
DISCUSSION
Staff will present some of the key deliverables from the Regional Mobility Hub Implementation Strategy (Strategy) and discuss the opportunity to propose Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) legislation that would authorize local jurisdictions to develop and implement NEV plans. Seeking legislation that would enable NEV implementation is recommended as an early action in the Strategy. Staff from the cities of Chula Vista and Carlsbad will discuss their plans to develop NEV plans for their communities.
Estimated Start Time: 2:55 p.m.
14. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION
The next TWG meeting is scheduled on Thursday, March 15, 2018, from 3 to 4:30 p.m. This meeting will be held on the third Thursday of the month, and will be held off-site at UC San Diego in conjunction with the UC San Diego Urban Expo. TWG members are invited to join UC San Diego students, faculty, and staff for the Urban Expo following the TWG meeting.
Estimated Start Time: 3:10 p.m.
15. ADJOURNMENT
+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment
San Diego Association of Governments
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
7
February 8, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4
Action Requested: INFORMATION
REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT DETERMINATION File Number 3100200
Introduction
The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the sixth housing element cycle (2021 – 2028) is being prepared in conjunction with the development of San Diego Forward: The 2019-2050 Regional Plan (2019 Regional Plan) in accordance with Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) (Steinberg, 2008). SB 375 calls for the coordination and integration of housing planning with the regional transportation plan.
The RHNA process has three main components:
• RHNA Determination – The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) regionwide housing need determination
• RHNA Plan - The SANDAG plan to distribute the RHNA Determination to the local jurisdictions by four income categories, which includes the RHNA methodology
• RHNA – Each jurisdiction’s housing need allocation in four income categories for use in updating local housing elements.
Discussion
Draft RHNA Determination – Consultation and Review
Government Code 65584(a) requires HCD to prepare the RHNA Determination by estimating the number of housing units needed in the region using the following data:
• Population forecast from the California Department of Finance (DOF)
• Projected number of new households formed
• Vacancy rate
• Overcrowding rate, defined as more than one person per room per dwelling unit
8
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 65584(b) and 65584.01(c), HCD is required to consult with SANDAG to create the RHNA Determination. In the upcoming weeks, SANDAG expects to receive a draft RHNA Determination from HCD with an estimate of the total housing units needed for the region during the sixth housing element cycle. The draft RHNA Determination also will include the number of units that will need to be permitted for very-low-, low-, moderate-, and above-moderate-income households during the cycle.
As discussed with the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) on July 13, 2017, SANDAG will use the DOF population projection as the source of the total population for the upcoming Regional Growth Forecast. The same population projection will be used for the 2019 Regional Plan and RHNA process. As such, SANDAG review and consultation with HCD will likely focus on the other assumptions that form the RHNA Determination, which include household formation rates, vacancy rates, and persons per dwelling unit. SANDAG staff will compare assumptions to past and current trends and compile other relevant data to help inform the consultation process. The information will be shared with the TWG, Regional Planning Committee, and Board of Directors. Based upon the review and input received, SANDAG staff will consult with HCD on the RHNA Determination. The Government Code allows HCD to accept or reject information provided by SANDAG or modify its methodology based on the consultation.
Next Steps
SANDAG has invited the Director of HCD to the March 9, 2018, Board of Directors Policy meeting. TWG members are invited to attend that meeting for additional information about the RHNA process.
SANDAG will likely receive a final RHNA Determination in spring 2018 at which time the process to develop the RHNA Plan with all 19 local jurisdictions will begin.
1 BEVERLY HILLS2 CARPINTERIA3 CORTE MADERA4 FOSTER CITY5 HILLSBOROUGH6 LEMON GROVE7 NAPA COUNTY8 SAN ANSELMO9 SAN FERNANDO
10 SAN LUIS OBISPO11 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY12 SONOMA COUNTY13 WEST HOLLYWOOD
This determination represents Annual Progress Report (APR) data received as of January 31, 2018, and will be updated at least quarterly to incorporate new or corrected data provided by jurisdictions. The following 13 jurisdictions have met their prorated Lower (Very-Low and Low) and Above-Moderate Income Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the Reporting Period and submitted their latest APR (2016). These jurisdictions are not currently subject to SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining, but the jurisdictions are still encouraged to promote streamlining. All other cities and counties beyond these 13 are subject to at least some form of SB 35 streamlining, as indicated on the following page.
For more detail on the proration methodology or background data see the SB 35 Determination Methodology.
Cities and Counties Not Currently Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
January 31, 2018 Page 1 of 7
Agenda Item No. 5 Regional Planning Technical Working Group
February 8, 2018
9
SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION1 ADELANTO 31 BIGGS 61 CLEARLAKE2 ALAMEDA COUNTY 32 BISHOP 62 CLOVERDALE3 ALISO VIEJO 33 BLUE LAKE 63 CLOVIS4 ALPINE COUNTY 34 BLYTHE 64 COACHELLA5 ALTURAS 35 BRADBURY 65 COALINGA6 AMADOR 36 BRAWLEY 66 COLFAX7 AMADOR COUNTY 37 BREA 67 COLMA8 ANDERSON 38 BUENA PARK 68 COLTON9 ANGELS CAMP 39 BURBANK 69 COLUSA
10 APPLE VALLEY 40 BUTTE COUNTY 70 COLUSA COUNTY11 ARCADIA 41 CALABASAS 71 COMMERCE12 ARCATA 42 CALAVERAS COUNTY 72 COMPTON13 ARROYO GRANDE 43 CALEXICO 73 CONCORD14 ARTESIA 44 CALIFORNIA CITY 74 CORCORAN15 ARVIN 45 CALIMESA 75 CORNING16 ATWATER 46 CALIPATRIA 76 COTATI17 AUBURN 47 CAMARILLO 77 COVINA18 AVALON 48 CANYON LAKE 78 CRESCENT CITY19 AVENAL 49 CAPITOLA 79 CUDAHY20 AZUSA 50 CARLSBAD 80 CULVER CITY21 BAKERSFIELD 51 CARMEL 81 CYPRESS22 BALDWIN PARK 52 CARSON 82 DEL NORTE COUNTY23 BANNING 53 CATHEDRAL 83 DEL REY OAKS24 BARSTOW 54 CERES 84 DELANO25 BEAUMONT 55 CERRITOS 85 DESERT HOT SPRINGS26 BELL GARDENS 56 CHINO 86 DIAMOND BAR27 BELMONT 57 CHOWCHILLA 87 DINUBA28 BELVEDERE 58 CITRUS HEIGHTS 88 DIXON29 BENICIA 59 CLAREMONT 89 DORRIS30 BIG BEAR LAKE 60 CLAYTON 90 DOS PALOS
Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the most recent Annual Progress Report (2016), these jurisdictions are subject to SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability.
These conditions currently apply to the following 378 jurisdictions:
When Proposed Developments Include ≥ 10% Affordability
January 31, 2018 Page 2 of 710
SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION91 DOWNEY 131 HERMOSA BEACH 171 LAKE ELSINORE92 DUARTE 132 HESPERIA 172 LAKEPORT93 DUNSMUIR 133 HIDDEN HILLS 173 LANCASTER94 EAST PALO ALTO 134 HIGHLAND 174 LASSEN COUNTY95 EASTVALE 135 HOLLISTER 175 LATHROP96 EL CAJON 136 HOLTVILLE 176 LAWNDALE97 EL CENTRO 137 HUGHSON 177 LEMOORE98 EL MONTE 138 HUMBOLDT COUNTY 178 LINCOLN99 EL SEGUNDO 139 HUNTINGTON BEACH 179 LINDSAY
100 EMERYVILLE 140 HUNTINGTON PARK 180 LIVE OAK101 ENCINITAS 141 HURON 181 LIVINGSTON102 ESCALON 142 IMPERIAL 182 LODI103 ESCONDIDO 143 IMPERIAL BEACH 183 LOMA LINDA104 ETNA 144 IMPERIAL COUNTY 184 LOMITA105 EUREKA 145 INDUSTRY 185 LOMPOC106 EXETER 146 INGLEWOOD 186 LONG BEACH107 FAIRFAX 147 INYO COUNTY 187 LOOMIS108 FARMERSVILLE 148 IONE 188 LOS ALAMITOS109 FERNDALE 149 IRWINDALE 189 LOS ALTOS HILLS110 FILLMORE 150 ISLETON 190 LOS ANGELES COUNTY111 FIREBAUGH 151 JACKSON 191 LOS BANOS112 FORT BRAGG 152 JURUPA VALLEY 192 LOYALTON113 FORT JONES 153 KERMAN 193 LYNWOOD114 FORTUNA 154 KERN COUNTY 194 MADERA115 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 155 KING CITY 195 MALIBU116 FOWLER 156 KINGS COUNTY 196 MANHATTAN BEACH117 FRESNO 157 KINGSBURG 197 MANTECA118 GARDENA 158 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 198 MARICOPA119 GLENN COUNTY 159 LA HABRA 199 MARINA120 GONZALES 160 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 200 MARTINEZ121 GRAND TERRACE 161 LA MESA 201 MARYSVILLE122 GRASS VALLEY 162 LA MIRADA 202 MAYWOOD123 GREENFIELD 163 LA PALMA 203 MCFARLAND124 GRIDLEY 164 LA PUENTE 204 MENDOCINO COUNTY125 GUADALUPE 165 LA QUINTA 205 MENDOTA126 GUSTINE 166 LA VERNE 206 MENIFEE127 HALF MOON BAY 167 LAGUNA BEACH 207 MENLO PARK128 HANFORD 168 LAGUNA NIGUEL 208 MERCED129 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 169 LAGUNA WOODS 209 MERCED COUNTY130 HAYWARD 170 LAKE COUNTY 210 MILL VALLEY
Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
When Proposed Developments Include ≥ 10% AffordabilityWhen jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the most recent Annual Progress Report (2016), these jurisdictions are subject to SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability.
These conditions currently apply to the following 378 jurisdictions:
January 31, 2018 Page 3 of 711
SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION211 MILLBRAE 251 PISMO BEACH 291 SAN DIMAS212 MODESTO 252 PLEASANT HILL 292 SAN GABRIEL213 MODOC COUNTY 253 PLYMOUTH 293 SAN JACINTO214 MONTAGUE 254 POINT ARENA 294 SAN JOAQUIN215 MONTCLAIR 255 POMONA 295 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY216 MONTEBELLO 256 PORT HUENEME 296 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA217 MONTEREY 257 PORTERVILLE 297 SAN LEANDRO218 MONTEREY PARK 258 PORTOLA 298 SAN MATEO COUNTY219 MORAGA 259 POWAY 299 SAND CITY220 MORENO VALLEY 260 RANCHO CORDOVA 300 SANGER221 MORRO BAY 261 RANCHO MIRAGE 301 SANTA BARBARA222 MOUNT SHASTA 262 RED BLUFF 302 SANTA CLARITA223 MURRIETA 263 REDDING 303 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY224 NATIONAL CITY 264 REDLANDS 304 SANTA MONICA225 NEEDLES 265 REDONDO BEACH 305 SANTA PAULA226 NEVADA CITY 266 REDWOOD CITY 306 SANTA ROSA227 NEWARK 267 REEDLEY 307 SANTEE228 NEWMAN 268 RIALTO 308 SARATOGA229 NORCO 269 RICHMOND 309 SAUSALITO230 NORWALK 270 RIDGECREST 310 SCOTTS VALLEY231 NOVATO 271 RIO DELL 311 SEAL BEACH232 OCEANSIDE 272 RIO VISTA 312 SEASIDE233 OJAI 273 RIPON 313 SEBASTOPOL234 ONTARIO 274 RIVERBANK 314 SELMA235 ORANGE 275 RIVERSIDE 315 SHAFTER236 ORANGE COVE 276 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 316 SHASTA COUNTY237 ORLAND 277 ROHNERT PARK 317 SHASTA LAKE238 OROVILLE 278 ROLLING HILLS 318 SIERRA COUNTY239 OXNARD 279 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 319 SIERRA MADRE240 PACIFIC GROVE 280 ROSEMEAD 320 SIGNAL HILL241 PACIFICA 281 SACRAMENTO 321 SISKIYOU COUNTY242 PALM DESERT 282 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 322 SOLANA BEACH243 PALM SPRINGS 283 SALINAS 323 SOLEDAD244 PALMDALE 284 SAN BENITO COUNTY 324 SOLVANG245 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 285 SAN BERNARDINO 325 SONOMA246 PARADISE 286 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 326 SONORA247 PARAMOUNT 287 SAN BRUNO 327 SOUTH EL MONTE248 PATTERSON 288 SAN BUENAVENTURA 328 SOUTH GATE249 PICO RIVERA 289 SAN CLEMENTE 329 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE250 PINOLE 290 SAN DIEGO COUNTY 330 SOUTH PASADENA
When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the most recent Annual Progress Report (2016), these jurisdictions are subject to SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability.
These conditions currently apply to the following 378 jurisdictions:
Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
When Proposed Developments Include ≥ 10% Affordability
January 31, 2018 Page 4 of 712
SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION331 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 371 WINTERS332 STOCKTON 372 WOODLAKE333 SUSANVILLE 373 YOLO COUNTY334 SUTTER COUNTY 374 YREKA335 TEHACHAPI 375 YUBA CITY336 TEHAMA 376 YUBA COUNTY337 TEHAMA COUNTY 377 YUCAIPA338 TEMECULA 378 YUCCA VALLEY339 TEMPLE CITY340 TIBURON341 TORRANCE342 TRACY343 TRINIDAD344 TRINITY COUNTY345 TRUCKEE346 TULARE347 TULARE COUNTY348 TULELAKE349 TUOLUMNE COUNTY350 TURLOCK351 TWENTYNINE PALMS352 UKIAH353 UNION CITY354 UPLAND355 VALLEJO356 VENTURA COUNTY357 VERNON358 VICTORVILLE359 VILLA PARK360 WATERFORD361 WATSONVILLE362 WEED363 WEST SACRAMENTO364 WESTLAKE VILLAGE365 WESTMORLAND366 WHEATLAND367 WHITTIER368 WILLIAMS369 WILLITS370 WILLOWS
When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the most recent Annual Progress Report (2016), these jurisdictions are subject to SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability.
These conditions currently apply to the following 378 jurisdictions:
Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
When Proposed Developments Include ≥ 10% Affordability
January 31, 2018 Page 5 of 713
SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION1 AGOURA HILLS 36 FAIRFIELD 71 MONO COUNTY2 ALAMEDA 37 FOLSOM 72 MONROVIA3 ALBANY 38 FONTANA 73 MONTE SERENO4 ALHAMBRA 39 FREMONT 74 MONTEREY COUNTY5 AMERICAN CANYON 40 FRESNO COUNTY 75 MOORPARK6 ANAHEIM 41 FULLERTON 76 MORGAN HILL7 ANTIOCH 42 GALT 77 MOUNTAIN VIEW8 ATASCADERO 43 GARDEN GROVE 78 NAPA9 ATHERTON 44 GILROY 79 NEVADA COUNTY
10 BELL 45 GLENDALE 80 NEWPORT BEACH11 BELLFLOWER 46 GLENDORA 81 OAKDALE12 BERKELEY 47 GOLETA 82 OAKLAND13 BRENTWOOD 48 GROVER BEACH 83 OAKLEY14 BRISBANE 49 HAWTHORNE 84 ORANGE COUNTY15 BUELLTON 50 HEALDSBURG 85 ORINDA16 BURLINGAME 51 HEMET 86 PALO ALTO17 CALISTOGA 52 HERCULES 87 PARLIER18 CAMPBELL 53 INDIAN WELLS 88 PASADENA19 CHICO 54 INDIO 89 PASO ROBLES20 CHINO HILLS 55 IRVINE 90 PERRIS21 CHULA VISTA 56 LAFAYETTE 91 PETALUMA22 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 57 LAGUNA HILLS 92 PIEDMONT23 CORONA 58 LAKE FOREST 93 PITTSBURG24 CORONADO 59 LAKEWOOD 94 PLACENTIA25 COSTA MESA 60 LARKSPUR 95 PLACER COUNTY26 CUPERTINO 61 LIVERMORE 96 PLACERVILLE27 DALY CITY 62 LOS ALTOS 97 PLEASANTON28 DANA POINT 63 LOS ANGELES 98 PLUMAS COUNTY29 DANVILLE 64 LOS GATOS 99 PORTOLA VALLEY30 DAVIS 65 MADERA COUNTY 100 RANCHO CUCAMONGA31 DEL MAR 66 MAMMOTH LAKES 101 RANCHO PALOS VERDES32 DUBLIN 67 MARIN COUNTY 102 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA33 EL CERRITO 68 MARIPOSA COUNTY 103 ROCKLIN34 EL DORADO COUNTY 69 MILPITAS 104 ROSEVILLE35 ELK GROVE 70 MISSION VIEJO 105 ROSS
Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Lower income RHNA (Very Low and Low income), these jurisdictions are subject to SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining for proposed developments with at least 50% affordability. If the jurisdiction also has insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA, then they are subject to the more inclusive streamlining for developments with at least 10% affordability.
The following list includes the 148 jurisdictions that are not subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with ≥ 10% affordability, but are subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with ≥ 50% affordability.
When Proposed Developments Include ≥ 50% Affordability
January 31, 2018 Page 6 of 714
SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION106 SAINT HELENA 147 YORBA LINDA107 SAN CARLOS 148 YOUNTVILLE108 SAN DIEGO109 SAN FRANCISCO110 SAN JOSE111 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO112 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY113 SAN MARCOS114 SAN MARINO115 SAN MATEO116 SAN PABLO117 SAN RAFAEL118 SAN RAMON119 SANTA ANA120 SANTA CLARA121 SANTA CLARA COUNTY122 SANTA CRUZ123 SANTA FE SPRINGS124 SANTA MARIA125 SIMI VALLEY126 SOLANO COUNTY127 STANISLAUS COUNTY128 STANTON129 SUISUN CITY130 SUNNYVALE131 SUTTER CREEK132 TAFT133 THOUSAND OAKS134 TUSTIN135 VACAVILLE136 VISALIA137 VISTA138 WALNUT139 WALNUT CREEK140 WASCO141 WEST COVINA142 WESTMINSTER143 WILDOMAR144 WINDSOR145 WOODLAND146 WOODSIDE
When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Lower income RHNA (Very Low and Low income), these jurisdictions are subject to SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining for proposed developments with at least 50% affordability. If the jurisdiction also has insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA, then they are subject to the more inclusive streamlining for developments with at least 10% affordability.
The following list includes the 148 jurisdictions that are not subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with ≥ 10% affordability, but are subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with ≥ 50% affordability.
When Proposed Developments Include ≥ 50% Affordability
Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
January 31, 2018 Page 7 of 715
1
CALIFORNIA’S 2017 LEGISLATIVE HOUSING PACKAGE
Streamline Housing Development
Planning & Zoning
SB 35 (Wiener) Streamline Approval Process
Opt-in program for developers
Creates a streamlined approval process for developments in localities that have not yet met their housing targets, provided that the development is on an infill site and complies with existing residential and mixed use zoning.
Participating developments must provide at least 10 percent of units for lower-income families. All projects over 10 units must be prevailing wage and larger projects must provide skilled and trained labor.
Planning & Zoning
AB 73 (Chiu) Streamline and Incentivize Housing Production
Opt-in program for jurisdictions and developers
Provides state financial incentives to cities and counties that create a zoning overlay district with streamlined zoning. Development projects must use prevailing wage and include a minimum amount of affordable housing.
Planning & Zoning
SB 540 (Roth) Workforce Housing Opportunity Zones
Opt-in program for jurisdictions
Authorizes the state to provide planning funds to a city or county to adopt a specific housing development plan that minimizes project level environmental review. Requires at least 50 percent of total housing units within that plan to be affordable to persons or families, at or below moderate income, with at least 10 percent of total units affordable for lower income households. Development projects must use prevailing wage.
Accountability and Enforcement
Amends Housing Accountability Act
AB 678 (Bocanegra)/SB 167 (Skinner) Strengthen the Housing Accountability Act
Strengthens the Housing Accountability Act by increasing the documentation necessary and the standard of proof required for a local agency to legally defend its denial of low and moderate-income housing development projects, and requires courts to impose a fine of $10,000 or more per unit on local agencies that fail to legally defend their rejection of an affordable housing development project.
Agenda Item No. 6 Regional Planning Technical Working Group
February 8, 2018
16
2
Accountability and Enforcement (Continued)
Amends Housing Accountability Act
AB 1515 (Daly) Reasonable Person Standard
States that a housing development conforms with local land use requirements if there is substantial evidence that would allow a reasonable person to reach that conclusion.
Amends Housing Element Law
AB 72 (Santiago) Enforce Housing Element Law
Authorizes HCD to find a jurisdiction out of compliance with state housing law at any time (instead of the current eight-year time period), and refer any violations of state housing law to the Attorney General if it determines the action is inconsistent with the locality’s adopted housing element.
Amends Housing Element Law
AB 1397 (Low) Adequate Housing Element Sites
Requires cities to zone more appropriately for their share of regional housing needs and in certain circumstances require by-right1 development on identified sites. Requires stronger justification when non-vacant sites are used to meet housing needs, particularly for lower income housing.
Amends Existing Housing Law
SB 166 (Skinner) No Net Loss
Requires a city or county to identify additional low-income housing sites in their housing element when market-rate housing is developed on a site currently identified for low-income housing.
Amends Existing Reporting Requirements
AB 879 (Grayson) and Related Reporting Bills
Make various updates to housing element and annual report requirements to provide data on local implementation including number of project application and approvals, processing times, and approval processes. Charter cities would no longer be exempt from housing reporting. Requires HCD to deliver a report to the Legislature on how local fees impact the cost of housing development.
1 Current housing law defines by-right as local government review of a project may not require a conditional use permit or other discretionary action that would constitute a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act
17
3
Create and Preserve Affordable Housing
Ongoing Source
SB 2 (Atkins) Building Jobs and Homes Act
Imposes a fee on recording of real estate documents excluding sales for the purposes of funding affordable housing. Provides that first year proceeds will be split evenly between local planning grants and HCD’s programs that address homelessness. Thereafter, 70 percent of the proceeds will be allocated to local governments in either an over-the-counter or competitive process. Fifteen percent will be allocated to HCD, ten percent to assist the development of farmworker housing and five percent to administer a program to incentivize the permitting of affordable housing. Fifteen percent will be allocated to CalHFA to assist mixed-income multifamily developments.
Affordable Housing Bond
SB 3 (Beall) Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act
Places a $4 billion general obligation bond on the November 2018 general election ballot. Allocates $3 billion in bond proceeds among programs that assist affordable multifamily developments, housing for farmworkers, transit-oriented development, infrastructure for infill development, and homeownership. Also funds matching grants for Local Housing Trust Funds and homeownership programs. Provides $1 billion in bond proceeds to CalVet for home and farm purchase assistance for veterans.
Land Use: Zoning Regulations
AB 1505 (Bloom) Inclusionary Ordinances
Authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to require a certain amount of low-income housing on-site or off-site as a condition of the development of residential rental units.
Amends Preservation Noticing law
AB 1521 (Bloom) Preserve the Existing Affordable Housing Stock
Requires the seller of a subsidized housing development to accept a bonafide offer to purchase from a qualified purchaser, if specified requirements are met. Gives HCD additional tracking and enforcement responsibilities to ensure compliance.
Amends Farmworker Housing and Office of Migrant Services Programs
AB 571 (E. Garcia) Low-Income Housing Credits for Farmworkers
Makes modifications to the state’s farmworker housing tax credit to increase use. Authorizes HCD to advance funds to operators of migrant housing centers at the beginning of each season to allow them to get up-and-running. Extends the period of time that migrant housing centers may be occupied up to 275 days.
18
San Diego Association of Governments
JOINT MEETING OF THE REGIONAL ENERGY WORKING GROUP AND THE REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL
WORKING GROUP
19
February 8, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8A
Action Requested: APPROVE
NOVEMBER 9, 2017, MEETING MINUTES File Number 3100400
Please Note: Audio file of the meeting is available on the SANDAG website, sandag.org, on the webpages of the Regional Energy Working Group (EWG) and the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG).
The joint meeting of the EWG and TWG was called to order by TWG Chair Karen Brindley, City of San Marcos, at 1:21 p.m.
1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Self-Introductions were made.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Sebastian Sarria, San Diego Community Choice Alliance, submitted written comments and spoke of the advantages of Community Choice Energy for the San Diego region.
John Wotzka, a member of the public, spoke about energy-related news, which included: renewable energy; nuclear power; traditional fossil fuels and power plant issues; and climate change impacts.
Jeremy Hutman, Renew Financial, submitted written comments and provided an overview of Renew Financial’s role as administrator of the Property Assessed Clean Energy financing program and recent legislation passed (Senate Bill 242 and Assembly Bill 1284).
CONSENT
3. SAN DIEGO REGIONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE REBATE STATISTICS (INFORMATION)
The electric vehicle market in the San Diego region is rapidly growing. Updates from the Clean Vehicle Rebate Program on regional vehicle growth were presented.
Action: This item was presented for information.
20
REPORTS
4. PATHWAYS TO 100 PERCENT RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY (INFORMATION)
Jack Clark, City of San Diego, Dan King, City of Solana Beach, and Frank Urtasun, Sempra Services, presented on strategies, opportunities, and challenges associated with meeting a 100 percent renewable electricity target.
Action: This item was presented for information.
5. REGIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR CLIMATE ACTION PLANNING (DISCUSSION)
Allison Wood, Associate Regional/Energy Climate Planner, and Katie Hentrich, Regional Energy/ Climate Planner, presented an update on the development of a Regional Framework for Climate Action Planning (Regional Framework).
EWG and TWG members commented on the following items:
• Progress of moving towards a regional greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory.
• Accounting for “special districts” in GHG emissions inventory.
• Importance of providing recognition and guidance in the Regional Framework on completing a Climate Action Plan with California Environmental Quality Act categorical exemption.
Action: This item was presented for discussion.
6. SAN DIEGO FORWARD: DEVELOPMENT OF THE 2019 REGIONAL PLAN (INFORMATION)
Phil Trom, Senior Transportation Planner, reported on recent Board actions on the vision, goals, and policy objectives and on the approach to developing the revenue constrained transportation network scenarios for the 2019 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan.
Action: This item was presented for information.
7. UPCOMING MEETINGS (INFORMATION)
The next EWG meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 28, 2017, at 11:30 a.m.
The next TWG meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 14, 2017, from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m.; however, pending weather considerations the meeting could potentially be rescheduled to Wednesday, December 20, 2017, from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m. The meeting will be an off-site meeting to showcase Smart Growth Incentive Program and Active Transportation Grant Program projects in South County.
Action: This item was presented for information.
8. ADJOURNMENT
EWG Vice Chair Scott Anders, Energy Policy Initiatives Center, University of San Diego School of Law, adjourned the joint meeting at 3:03 p.m.
Meeting Start Time: 1:21 p.m. Meeting End Time: 3:03 p.m.
21
JOINT MEETING OF THE REGIONAL ENERGY WORKING GROUP AND REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
ATTENDANCE FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
JURISDICTION/ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING COMMENTS
City of Carlsbad Don Neu No
David De Cordova, Alternate Yes
City of Chula Vista Kelly Broughton No
Scott Donaghe, Alternate Yes
City of Coronado Rachel Hurst No
Jesse Brown, Alternate No
City of Del Mar Kathy Garcia No
City of El Cajon Tony Shute No
Melissa Devine, Alternate No
City of Encinitas
Roy Sapa’u No
Diane S. Langager, Alternate No
Laurie Winter, Alternate No
City of Escondido Bill Martin No
Michael Strong, Alternate No
City of Imperial Beach
Steve Dush No
Jim Nakagawa, Alternate Yes
Tyler Foltz, Alternate No
City of La Mesa Carol Dick No
Chris Jacobs, Alternate No
City of Lemon Grove David DeVries Yes
Mike Viglione, Alternate No
City of National City Brad Raulston Yes
Ray Pe, Alternate No
City of Oceanside Jeff Hunt Yes
Russ Cunningham, Alternate No
City of Poway Robert (Bob) Manis No
Joseph Lim, Alternate Yes
City of San Diego Jeff Murphy, TWG Vice Chair No
Brian Schoenfisch, Alternate No
City of San Marcos Karen Brindley, TWG Chair Yes
Saima Qureshy, Alternate No
City of Santee Melanie Kush No
John O’Donnell, Alternate No
22
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
JURISDICTION/ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING COMMENTS
City of Solana Beach Bill Chopyk Yes
Corey Andrews, Alternate No
City of Vista John Conley No
Patsy Chow, Alternate No
County of San Diego Nick Gustafson No
ADVISORY MEMBERS LISTED BELOW (ATTENDANCE NOT COUNTED FOR QUORUM PURPOSES)
Air Pollution Control District Kathy Keehan Yes
Andy Hamilton, Alternate No
Caltrans Ann Fox No
Barby Valentine, Alternate Yes
Local Agency Formation Commission
Robert Barry, AICP No
Joe Serrano, Alternate No
Metropolitan Transit System Denis Desmond No
North County Transit District
Damon Blythe No
Kristina Svensk, AICP Yes
Kimberly Hayford No
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority
Brendan Reed Yes
San Diego County Regional Water Authority
Seevani Bista No
San Diego Unified Port District Lesley Nishihira No
U.S. Department of Defense Vacant No
OTHER ATTENDEES SANDAG STAFF MEMBERS LISTED BELOW
Cory Downs – City of Chua Vista
Ben Boyce – Southwest Stratigies
Anna Fege – SD Regional Urban Forests Council
Mike Grim – City of Carlsbad
Dan King – City of Solana Beach
Chris Nanson – SDG&E
Christine Pawlik – City of Poway
Linda Giannelle Pratt - SCFGK
Cesar Rios – RioSolutions
Frank Urtasun – Sempra Services
John Wotzka – Member of the Public
Susan Freedman, Senior Reigonal Planner
Keith Greer, Principal Environmental Planner
Katie Hentrich, Regional Energy/Climate Planner II
Andrea Schlientz, Land Use/Grants Administration Intern
Phil Trom, Senior Transportation Planner
Allison Wood, Associate Regional Planner
San Diego Association of Governments
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
25
February 8, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8B
Action Requested: APPROVE
NOVEMBER 9, 2017, MEETING MINUTES File Number 3100400
Please Note: Audio file of the meeting is available on the SANDAG website, sandag.org, on the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) webpage.
The meeting of the TWG was called to order by Chair Karen Brindley, City of San Marcos, at 3:04 p.m.
1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Self-Introductions were made.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Carolina Ilic, Senior Regional Planner, announced the retirement of Carol Dick, City of La Mesa, and circulated a certificate of appreciation for signatures.
3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES (APPROVE)
Action: Upon a motion by Jim Nakagawa (City of Imperial Beach) and a second by Bill Chopyk (City of Solana Beach), the TWG approved the minutes from its October 12, 2017, meeting. Yes: Chair Brindley, David De Cordova (City of Carlsbad), Scott Donaghe (City of Chula Vista), Mr. Nakagawa, David DeVries (City of Lemon Grove), Brad Raulston (City of National City), Jeff Hunt (City of Oceanside), Joseph Lim (City of Poway), and Mr. Chopyk. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: City of Coronado, City of Del Mar, City of El Cajon, City of Encinitas, City of Escondido, City of La Mesa, City of San Diego, City of Santee, City of Vista, and County of San Diego.
Caltrans has developed statewide targets for safety and SANDAG, as the metropolitan transportation agency, must either support the statewide targets or develop regional targets by February 27, 2018. Rachel Kennedy, Senior Regional Planner, provided information on the statewide targets and options for regional targets.
Action: This item was presented for discussion.
26
5. SENATE BILL 1: CALLS FOR PROJECTS (DISCUSSIONS)
The California Transportation Commission released calls for projects for two new Senate Bill 1 programs. Dawn Vettese, Financial Programming Manager, provided an overview of the Local Partnership and Trade Corridor Enhancement Programs and solicited feedback on potential regional submissions.
Action: This item was presented for discussion.
6. UPCOMING MEETINGS (INFORMATION)
The next TWG meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 14, 2017, from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m.; however, pending weather considerations the meeting could potentially be rescheduled to Wednesday, December 20, 2017, from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m. The meeting will be an off-site meeting to showcase Smart Growth Incentive Program and Active Transportation Grant Program projects in South County.
Action: This item was presented for information.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Brindley adjourned the TWG meeting at 3:28 p.m.
Meeting Start Time: 3:04 p.m. Meeting End Time: 3:28 p.m.
27
MEETING OF THE REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP ATTENDANCE FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
JURISDICTION/ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING COMMENTS
City of Carlsbad Don Neu No
David De Cordova, Alternate Yes
City of Chula Vista Kelly Broughton No
Scott Donaghe, Alternate Yes
City of Coronado Rachel Hurst No
Jesse Brown, Alternate No
City of Del Mar Kathy Garcia No
City of El Cajon Tony Shute No
Melissa Devine, Alternate No
City of Encinitas
Roy Sapa’u No
Diane S. Langager, Alternate No
Laurie Winter, Alternate No
City of Escondido Bill Martin No
Michael Strong, Alternate No
City of Imperial Beach
Steve Dush No
Jim Nakagawa, Alternate Yes
Tyler Foltz, Alternate No
City of La Mesa Carol Dick No
Chris Jacobs, Alternate No
City of Lemon Grove David DeVries Yes
Mike Viglione, Alternate No
City of National City Brad Raulston Yes
Ray Pe, Alternate No
City of Oceanside Jeff Hunt Yes
Russ Cunningham, Alternate No
City of Poway Robert (Bob) Manis No
Joseph Lim, Alternate Yes
City of San Diego Jeff Murphy, TWG Vice Chair No
Brian Schoenfisch, Alternate No
City of San Marcos Karen Brindley, TWG Chair Yes
Saima Qureshy, Alternate No
City of Santee Melanie Kush No
John O’Donnell, Alternate No
28
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
JURISDICTION/ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING COMMENTS
City of Solana Beach Bill Chopyk Yes
Corey Andrews, Alternate No
City of Vista John Conley No
Patsy Chow, Alternate No
County of San Diego Nick Gustafson No
ADVISORY MEMBERS LISTED BELOW (ATTENDANCE NOT COUNTED FOR QUORUM PURPOSES)
Air Pollution Control District Kathy Keehan Yes
Andy Hamilton, Alternate No
Caltrans Ann Fox No
Barby Valentine, Alternate Yes
Local Agency Formation Commission
Robert Barry, AICP No
Keene Simonds, Alternate No
Metropolitan Transit System Denis Desmond No
North County Transit District
Damon Blythe No
Kimberly Hayford, Alternate No
Kristina Svensk, Alternate Yes
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority
Brendan Reed Yes
San Diego County Regional Water Authority
Seevani Bista No
San Diego Unified Port District Lesley Nishihira No
U.S. Department of Defense Mary Beth Dreusike No
OTHER ATTENDEES SANDAG STAFF MEMBERS LISTED BELOW
Carolina Ilic, Senior Regional Planner, TWG Coordinator Rachel Kennedy, Senior Regional Planner Andrea Schlientz, Land Use/Grants Administration Intern Dawn Vettese, Financial Programming Manager
San Diego Association of Governments
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
29
February 8, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8C
Action Requested: APPROVE
DECEMBER 14, 2017, MEETING MINUTES File Number 3100400
Please Note: Audio file of the meeting is not available, as the meeting was held off site.
The meeting of the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) was called to order by Chair Karen Brindley, City of San Marcos, at 1:35 p.m.
1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Self-Introductions were made.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
No public comments and communications were made.
CHAIR’S REPORTS
3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES (APPROVE)
The minutes from the November 9, 2017, meetings were postponed due to the lack of a quorum.
4. CELEBRATION: BILL CHOPYK RETIRING FROM CITY OF SOLANA BEACH (INFORMATION)
Chair Brindley stated that after nearly 33 years in the planning profession, Bill Chopyk will retire from the City of Solana Beach on December 28, 2017. Chair Brindley thanked Mr. Chopyk for his service, including serving as the TWG Chair and Vice Chair, and for his continued dedication to local and regional planning issues. TWG members congratulated Mr. Chopyk and wished him the best as he enters retirement.
5. TransNet SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM AND ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION GRANT PROGRAM: CYCLE 4 CALLS FOR PROJECTS (INFORMATION)
Carolina Ilic, Senior Regional Planner, reported that on December 15, 2017, the SANDAG Board of Directors will be asked to approve the evaluation criteria and release the calls for projects for the Cycle 4 TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program (SGIP) and Active Transportation Grant Program, including the Climate Action Plan and Complete Streets Policy grants funded by the SGIP. Applications are due on March 15, 2018. Pre-application workshops are scheduled the morning of Thursday, January 11, 2018.
30
REPORTS
6. SAN DIEGO FORWARD: THE 2019 REGIONAL PLAN – DRAFT PERFORMANCE MEASURES (DISCUSSION)
Rachel Kennedy, Senior Regional Planner, discussed the draft performance measures for use in the development of San Diego Forward: The 2019 Regional Plan (Regional Plan) and solicited discussion from the TWG. TWG members commented on following items:
• How the Regional Housing Needs Assessment fits into the development of the Regional Plan.
• Level of service versus vehicle miles traveled metrics.
Action: This item was presented for discussion.
7. SAGE PROJECT AT SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (INFORMATION)
Jessica Barlow, Ph.D., Director of the Sage Project, provided an overview of the Sage Project, and examples of the work that San Diego State University students have undertaken. Partnerships with BrightSide Produce San Diego, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the United Nations also were highlighted.
Action: This item was presented for information.
8. UPCOMING MEETINGS (INFORMATION)
The next regularly scheduled TWG meeting will be held on January 11, 2018, at 1:15 p.m.
Action: This item was presented for information.
9. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Brindley adjourned the TWG meeting at 2:15 p.m. for the site tours of the cities of National City and Chula Vista.
Meeting Start Time: 1:35 p.m. Meeting End Time: 2:15 p.m.
31
MEETING OF THE REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP ATTENDANCE FOR December 14, 2017
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
JURISDICTION/ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING COMMENTS
City of Carlsbad Don Neu No
David De Cordova, Alternate No
City of Chula Vista Kelly Broughton No
Scott Donaghe, Alternate Yes
City of Coronado Rachel Hurst No
Jesse Brown, Alternate Yes
City of Del Mar Kathy Garcia No
City of El Cajon Tony Shute No
Melissa Devine, Alternate No
City of Encinitas
Brenda Wisneski No
Roy Sapa’u, Alternate No
Diane S. Langager, Alternate No
City of Escondido Bill Martin No
Michael Strong, Alternate No
City of Imperial Beach
Steve Dush No
Jim Nakagawa, Alternate Yes
Tyler Foltz, Alternate No
City of La Mesa Kerry Kusiak No
Chris Jacobs, Alternate No
City of Lemon Grove David DeVries Yes
Mike Viglione, Alternate No
City of National City Brad Raulston Yes
Ray Pe, Alternate No
City of Oceanside Jeff Hunt Yes
Russ Cunningham, Alternate Yes
City of Poway Robert (Bob) Manis No
Joseph Lim, Alternate No
City of San Diego Jeff Murphy, TWG Vice Chair No
Brian Schoenfisch, Alternate No
City of San Marcos Karen Brindley, TWG Chair Yes
Saima Qureshy, Alternate No
City of Santee Melanie Kush No
John O’Donnell, Alternate No
32
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
JURISDICTION/ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING COMMENTS
City of Solana Beach Bill Chopyk Yes
Corey Andrews, Alternate No
City of Vista John Conley No
Patsy Chow, Alternate No
County of San Diego Nick Gustafson No
ADVISORY MEMBERS LISTED BELOW (ATTENDANCE NOT COUNTED FOR QUORUM PURPOSES)
Air Pollution Control District Kathy Keehan No
Andy Hamilton, Alternate No
Caltrans Ann Fox No
Barby Valentine, Alternate Yes
Local Agency Formation Commission
Robert Barry, AICP No
Keene Simonds, Alternate No
Metropolitan Transit System Denis Desmond No
North County Transit District
Damon Blythe No
Kimberly Hayford, Alternate No
Kristina Svensk, Alternate No
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority
Brendan Reed No
San Diego County Regional Water Authority
Seevani Bista No
San Diego Unified Port District Lesley Nishihira No
U.S. Department of Defense Mary Beth Dreusike No
OTHER ATTENDEES SANDAG STAFF MEMBERS LISTED BELOW
Jessica Barlow, SDSU Sage Project
Carolina Ilic, Senior Regional Planner, TWG Coordinator Tracy Ferchaw, Associate Grant Analyst Rachel Kennedy, Senior Regional Planner Andrea Schlientz, Land Use/Grants Administration Intern Andrew Hall, Land Use Intern
San Diego Association of Governments
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
33
February 8, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 9
Action Requested: INFORMATION
2018 MEETING SCHEDULE, MEMBERSHIP ROSTER, FORM 700, File Number 3100400 AND VICE CHAIR ELECTIONS
Introduction
This report outlines the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) meetings for Calendar Year 2018, provides the Membership Roster, includes information on annual Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests, and provides a timeline for the election of the next TWG Vice Chair.
2018 Meeting Schedule
The TWG generally meets on the second Thursday of every month from 1:15 to 3:15 p.m., in the 7th Floor Conference Room at SANDAG. The TWG also occasionally meets jointly with the Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, the Active Transportation Working Group, and the Regional Energy Working Group. The following are the regularly scheduled meeting dates:
• January 11, 2018 – Meeting Cancelled
• February 8, 2018
• March 15, 2018 – Special meeting on the third Thursday from 3 to 4:30 p.m. at UC San Diego
• April 12, 2018
• May 10, 2018
• June 14, 2018
• July 12, 2018
• August 9, 2018
• September 13, 2018
• October 11, 2018
• November 8, 2018
• December 13, 2018
34
Membership Roster and Form 700
The TWG Membership Roster is attached (Attachment 1). Any updates or corrections to the roster should be forwarded to SANDAG staff this month. Members and alternates listed on the roster must fill out their annual Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests by the spring. More detailed instructions on filling out a Form 700 will be emailed to TWG members next month.
Vice Chair Elections
The position of TWG Vice Chair has become open. Elections for a new Vice Chair will be held at the April TWG meeting. Only members listed on the roster are eligible for nomination. Nominations will be made at the meeting. Self-nominations are allowed. All members nominated must accept the nomination to be considered for the position. Votes will be recorded and noted in the minutes by person and jurisdiction.
Attachment: 1. Regional Planning Technical Working Group Membership Roster
Deputy District Director, Planning & Local Assistance Caltrans District 11, Planning Division 4050 Taylor Street – Mail Station 240 San Diego, CA 92110
Agenda Item No. 10 Regional Planning Technical Working Group
February 8, 2017
Revised: December 2013February 2018
42
WORKING GROUP CHARTER Regional Planning Technical Working Group
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) is to review and make recommendations on key activities associated with the preparation and implementation of San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (which merges the Regional Comprehensive Plan, Regional Transportation Plan, and Sustainable Communities Strategy), the Regional Growth Forecast, and other SANDAG land use, transportation, housing, public health, social equity, and environmental, and related planning activities.
LINE OF REPORTING
The TWG acts in an advisory capacity to the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees primarily on regional planning activities. The Regional Planning and Transportation Committees report to the SANDAG Board. The SANDAG Board makes final decisions on San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan and other related planning activities.
RESPONSIBILITIES
The TWG makes recommendations on key regional planning and implementation activities. These tasks include the preparation of San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan, and the development/update of the Smart Growth Concept Map, the Smart Growth Incentive Program/Active Transportation Grant Program, land use, housing, and transportation efforts, including transit oriented development and complete streets performance indicators and targets, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, public health as related to the built environment, social equity and environmental justice, and other related items. The TWG also assists with associated public outreach activities and helps inform and encourage active public participation by citizens and groups throughout the region. In general, the TWG’s focus is on land use, transportation, and environmental planning activities of regional significance.
MEMBERSHIP
The membership of the TWG includes the planning/community development directors of the 19 local jurisdictions in the region (or their alternates). Representatives of Caltrans, the Local Agency Formation Commission, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, U.S. Department of Defense, North County Transit District (NCTD), and Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) are advisory members.
MEETING TIME AND LOCATION
The TWG meets on a monthly basis at SANDAG. Meetings are generally held on the second Thursday of the month from 1:15 to 3:15 p.m. in the Seventh Floor Conference Room at SANDAG. Additional meetings may be scheduled as deemed necessary by the working group Chair.
SELECTION OF THE CHAIR
The Chair and Vice Chair of the TWG are chosen by the members of the group on a periodic basis.
DURATION OF EXISTENCE
The TWG is a standing working group.
San Diego Association of Governments
REGIONAL PLANNING TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
43
February 8, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 13
Action Requested: DISCUSSION
REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY File Number 3310701 AND NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLE LEGISLATION
Introduction
As part of San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan, SANDAG recently completed key deliverables of the Regional Mobility Hub Implementation Strategy (Strategy). The final deliverables and additional information on the Strategy may be found at: SDForward.com/RegionalMobilityHub. The deliverables include a Mobility Hub Features Catalog (Catalog), technical memos that provide guidance on mobility hub implementation and equity considerations, profile sheets for eight mobility hub prototype locations in the region, and conceptual designs for three of the prototype locations. The Catalog illustrates the types of services, amenities, and technologies that can work together to make it easier for people to connect to transit, while also providing them with enhanced mobility options. The Catalog serves as a resource for jurisdictions, transit operators, and private mobility service providers as they collaborate to design and implement mobility hubs around the region. The prototypes were developed for eight sites in the San Diego region to demonstrate how mobility hub services and amenities can be tailored to meet specific community needs. The implementation and equity memos provide guidance on planning, policy, and partnerships that can guide equitable implementation of mobility hubs. A regional mobility hub network and a 3-D mobility hub visual simulation for the Oceanside Transit Center prototype location will be developed spring 2018.
Discussion
A fundamental component of the Strategy is neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs). Shared NEVs provide a clean, economical, and convenient alternative to driving alone for neighborhood trips and connecting to transit. An early action identified in the Strategy was to propose legislation that would allow communities in the San Diego region to develop and implement NEV Transportation Plans. SANDAG staff is taking action on this legislation, which would amend the California Vehicle Code (CVC) to allow for the adoption of community-specific NEV Transportation Plans by any jurisdiction in the region.
Neighborhood Electric Vehicles
The CVC defines a NEV as a low-speed motorized vehicle that has four wheels, can reach speeds of 25 miles per hour (mph), and may operate on any street with a posted speed limit of 35 mph or less. NEVs have a gross vehicle weight rating of less than 3,000 pounds and must be certified to meet the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards to be registered and operated on public streets and roads. A valid driver license, registration, and insurance also are required to operate a NEV.
NEVs offer a convenient motorized travel option for community members making short trips. Traditionally NEVs have been associated with golf carts, but vehicle design and technology is advancing and the range of NEVs is evolving to include compact shuttles (like the Polaris GEM e6 used by the Free Ride Everywhere Downtown service in Downtown San Diego), autonomous shuttles (like the EZ10 or the AUTONOM SHUTTLE), and compact personal electric vehicles (like the Toyota i-Road).
Why New Legislation is Needed
The implementation of NEVs is limited without legislation that would enable the development of NEV Transportation Plans that specify where and how NEVs can operate in the region. With advances in automotive technology, newer NEV models are emerging and being designed to travel at faster speeds, which is why it is especially important for communities to develop a safe local road network to accommodate NEVs and other roadway users. Demonstrations of autonomous NEV shuttles are planned as part of the San Diego Regional Proving Ground, and both the cities of Chula Vista and Carlsbad are preparing to develop NEV Transportation Plans to support mobility hub implementation in their communities. Additionally, NEVs may assist member agencies in meeting climate action plan goals while aligning with electric vehicle planning and implementation efforts regionwide.
Communities That Have Successfully Amended the Vehicle Code
To date the Legislature has authorized NEV Bills in multiple jurisdictions across the state.
• AB 1781 (Villines) City of Fresno
• AB 584 (Huber) County of Amador and the cities of Jackson, Sutter Creek, and Amador City
• AB 2963 (Gaines) Cities of Lincoln and Rocklin
• AB 61 (Jeffries) County of Riverside
• SB 241 (Bates) County of Orange
The County of Riverside serves as an exemplary case of a county that recently amended the CVC to authorize the development of a NEV Transportation Plan. Since the adoption of Assembly Bill 61 in 2011, the Coachella Valley adopted a NEV transportation plan.
NEV Transportation Plans contain specific elements including NEV route selection and classification, coordination with other modes, and the provision of NEV facilities such as parking, charging infrastructure, signage, and travel lane markings. NEV Transportation Plans also must demonstrate how NEVs will be safely operated and coordinated with traffic law enforcement. NEV Transportation Plans are subject to approval by the California Department of Transportation if they include the use of or crossing of a state highway.
On February 9, the SANDAG Executive Committee will consider the SANDAG legislative program for 2018, which includes support for efforts to enhance sustainable and efficient mobility and advancing connected and autonomous vehicle technology. Based on feedback from the Executive Committee and the Board, staff will continue to work on legislative efforts to advance NEV legislation.
La Mesa 71 550Lemon Grove 154 151National City 0 1,058Oceanside 989 1,762Poway 123 54San Diego 4,495 36,337San Marcos 1,087 5,531Santee 1,888 507Solana Beach 35 131Vista 753 1,524Unincorporated 11,533 4,098
Total 29,771 72,254
2/9/2018
3
Regionwide Growth Forecast
• Compile information from historical and external data sources
• Department of Finance’s 2017 population projections
• Housing units and households
• Jobs and workers
• Income
• Expert Review Panel on 2/14 • Review different inputs, provide feedback
• Incorporate input and develop a final regionwide forecast
2/9/2018
4
San Diego Population 2018 and 2050
2/9/2018
5
2/9/2018
6
Next Steps
• Assign structure type to residential capacity using general plan information
• Will provide to TWG members for review
• Present Regionwide Results to RPC on 3/2 and to the Board on 3/9
• Provide TWG members with final regionwide forecast
• Preliminary subregional model runs and review results
• Share results with TWG at 3/15 meeting
• Present results to RPC and Board in April
2/9/2018
1
REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Seth Litchney, Senior Regional Planner, SANDAG
Megan Kirkeby, Department of Housing and Community Development
RHNA Process
•RHNA Determination
•RHNA Plan
•RHNA
2/9/2018
2
Draft RNHA Determination
•Housing Units Needed for the Region
•Sixth housing element cycle
•2021‐2028
•Data Used:• Population forecast from the California Department of Finance
• Projected number of new households formed
• Vacancy rate
• Overcrowding rate
Review and Consultation
•SANDAG and HCD discuss methodology
•Department of Finance Population Forecast
•Other calculations
•HCD Final RHNA Determination
2/9/2018
3
TWG Input
•SANDAG staff is seeking the TWG’s input on considerations for the RHNA consultation with HCD.
RHNA SCHEDULE
DATE SANDAG MEETING ACTION
February – March 2018 HCD/SANDAG Consultation
March –April 2018 HCD provides final RHNA determination
June‐July 2018 TWG RHNA methodology discussion
August‐September 2018 RPC and Board of Directors (Board)
RHNA methodology discussions
October 2018 TWG RHNA Plan with jurisdiction/income allocations discussion
November – December 2018 RPC and Board RHNA Plan with jurisdiction/income allocations discussions
February 2019 TWG RHNA Plan and allocation recommendation
March 2019 RPC RHNA Plan and allocation recommendation
March 2019 Board Draft RHNA approval
October 2019 Board Board adopts San Diego Forward: 2019‐2050 Regional Plan and RHNA
April 2021 Sixth cycle housing elements due
2/9/2018
1
Regional Mobility Hub Implementation Strategy and Neighborhood Electric Legislation
Regional Planning Technical Working Group
February 8, 2018
2 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
2/9/2018
2
3 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
Mobility Hub Features Catalog
4 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
• Sorrento Valley COASTER Station
Mobility Hub Prototypes
2/9/2018
3
5 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
Mobility Hub Prototypes
6 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
Mobility Hub Implementation and Equity• Implementation Considerations memo
recommends strategies to facilitate mobility hubs:• planning and policies• allocating space for hub features• data sharing• public-private partnerships
• Equity Considerations memo summarizes some benefits, challenges, and best practices associated with equitable implementation of mobility hubs
2/9/2018
4
7 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
Regional Mobility Hub Implementation Strategy
• All deliverables produced to date can be accessed atwww.SDForward.com/RegionalMobilityHubs
• Next steps• 3-D visual simulation for Oceanside Transit Center• Mobility hub network
8 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
Neighborhood Electric Vehicles• Per the California Vehicle Code (CVC):
o NEVs are low speed, four‐wheeled motorized vehicles that can reach speeds of 25 mph and weigh less than 3,000 lbs.
o NEVs may operate on streets with speed limits of 35 mph or less
• Vehicle design and technology is advancing to include compact shuttles, autonomous shuttles, and personal electric vehicles
Toyota iRoadFRED Shuttle (Polaris GEM e6) Navya AUTONOM Shuttle
2/9/2018
5
9 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
• State legislation required to amend the California Streets and Highways Code to allow jurisdictions to develop and adopt NEV transportation plans
• NEV Transportation Plans must demonstrate how NEVs will be safely operated and coordinated with traffic law enforcement
Legislative Background
Where It’s Been Done
10 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
• Jurisdictions that have successfully amended the vehicle code include:
City of Lincoln NEV Transportation Plan
o AB 1781 (Villines) City of Fresnoo AB 584 (Huber) County of Amador
and the cities of Jackson, Sutter Creek, and Amador City
o AB 2693 (Gaines) Cities of Lincoln and Rocklin
o AB 61 (Jeffries) County of Riversideo SB 241 (Bates) County of Orange
CVAG NEV Plan
2/9/2018
6
Why Local NEV Legislation is Needed
11 REGIONAL MOBIL ITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND NEV LEGISLAT ION
• San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan envisions the expansion of shared NEVs
• Implementation of NEVs is limited without the legislation
• Chula Vista and Carlsbad are preparing to develop NEV Transportation Plans