Top Banner
Meeting at UC-San Diego 13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi-Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant Professor, University of California Berkeley Stephen A. Mahin, Co-PI Clay J. Naito, Post-doc. Erik Kunkel, Grad. student Suzanne Robinson, Grad. student Patrik Meyer, Undergrad. student
18

Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Mar 29, 2015

Download

Documents

Terrence Clegg
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001

Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi-Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder

Parking

Khalid M. MosalamAssistant Professor, University of California Berkeley

Stephen A. Mahin, Co-PIClay J. Naito, Post-doc.

Erik Kunkel, Grad. studentSuzanne Robinson, Grad. student

Patrik Meyer, Undergrad. student

Page 2: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Building Design

1. Apartment building with tuckunder parking (open front in the ground story) and flat roof

2. Three-story structure 3. Upper two stories have 2 units with doors and windows

on back wall and windows on front wall4. 1960’s structure designed according to UBC-645. Model dimensions: 32’ x 16’ x 27’

Page 3: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 4: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 5: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 6: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 7: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 8: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 9: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 10: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 11: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Rehabilitation

Reduce the risk of ground story collapse

• Design according to UBC-97• Vertical elements at open front: steel moment frames• Enhancement of ground story back wall with holdowns at

openings

Page 12: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 13: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.
Page 14: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

System TestingQuasi-static:

1) First story with open front (initial stiffness)

2) First story with retrofitted front

Dynamic:

1) First story with closed front (vibration)

2) First two stories with closed front (vibration)

3) First two stories with open front (vibration)

4) Three story with steel moment frame at front

5) Three story with open front

6) Three story with open front and finish materials

7) Finished three story with steel moment frame at front

Page 15: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Component TestingTwo types of connections:

1) Vertical elements to header (SMF, OMF, shear wall)

2) Diaphragm to header (four conditions)

a) Existing b) Minimal c) Moderate d) Conservative

a) 2-10d TN (each side) b) Same as a) + A35 (every other block)c) Same as b) + 2-LS70 top d) same as b) + 8d @ 4’’

6x12

2x12

Page 16: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Diaphragm to Header Setup

Page 17: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Diaphragm to Header SpecimensID C0 C1 C2

Header to Joist(per joist)

4–10d TN 4–10d TN 2–16d TN

Joist to Blocking(ea. side)

Alternate2–16d EN

&4–8d TN

4–10d TN Alternate2–8d EdgeTN & 1–8dCorner TN

Blocking to Header None 4–10d TN None

Joist to PlywoodTypical Field Nailing of

8d @ 12 in.

Page 18: Meeting at UC-San Diego13 January, 2001 Task 1.1.2: Shake Table Tests of a Multi- Story Apartment Building with Tuckunder Parking Khalid M. Mosalam Assistant.

Preliminary Results