Top Banner
Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?
28

Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Media concentration

Is it harming democracy?Or are worries overblown?

Page 2: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Under the Big Apple

• Boston Globe (1993)• Worcester Telegram & Gazette (1999)• Boston.com• New England Sports Network (14 percent)• Boston Red Sox (17 percent)• Boston Metro (49 percent)

Page 3: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox

Page 4: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

• Red Sox– Game coverage

Possible conflicts of interest

Page 5: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox– Game coverage– Stadium

Page 6: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox– Game coverage– Stadium– Ancillary businesses such as travel

Page 7: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox– Game coverage– Stadium– Ancillary businesses such as travel– NASCAR

Page 8: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox– Game coverage– Stadium– Ancillary businesses such as travel– NASCAR– Unflattering feature stories

Page 9: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox

• Worcester Telegram & Gazette–Media coverage

Page 10: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox

• Worcester Telegram & Gazette–Media coverage–Media scandal

Page 11: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox

• Worcester Telegram & Gazette–Media coverage–Media scandal– A two-way street

Page 12: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox

• Worcester Telegram & Gazette

• New England Sports Network–What’s a TV critic to do?

Page 13: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox

• Worcester Telegram & Gazette

• New England Sports Network

• Boston Metro– Boston Herald’s antitrust case

Page 14: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Possible conflicts of interest

• Red Sox

• Worcester Telegram & Gazette

• New England Sports Network

• Boston Metro– Boston Herald’s antitrust case– Putting the Herald out of business

Page 15: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Elsewhere in Boston

• Boston Herald is largest independent daily in New England

• GateHouse Media of Fairport, N.Y., owns 100+ papers in Eastern Mass.

• Nearly all TV and radio stations owned by out-of-state corporations

Page 16: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

A.J. Liebling

• Legendarymedia critic forthe New Yorker

• 50 years ago, warned of “one-ownership towns”

• A publisher’s paradise — “Good, better, bestest”

Page 17: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Death of commercial radio

• Telecommunications Act of 1996 removed most ownership restrictions

• Clear Channel (Minot, N.D.) and Cumulus (Dixie Chicks) become symbols

• Why is broadcast different from print?

Page 18: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Danny Schechter

• “The News Dissector”

• Warns against the “mediaocracy” — “a political system tethered to amedia system”

• Example: Run-up to war in Iraq

Page 19: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Setback for monopolists

• Michael Powell’s FCC proposes more deregulatory goodies inJune 2003

• A left-right coalitionfights back

• Congress, courts put FCC planon hold

Page 20: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Back to Liebling

• Liebling’s concern was the one-city monopoly

• Fewer dailies today than 50 years ago

• What has changed?

Page 21: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Back to Liebling

• Liebling’s concern was the one-city monopoly

• Fewer dailies today than 50 years ago

• What has changed?• More concentration,

yet more diversity

Page 22: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Time Warner

CNN, AOL, HBO, and magazines such as Time, People, and Sports Illustrated

Page 23: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Viacom/CBS

CBS, MTV, Comedy Central, plus numerous broadcast stations

Page 24: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Walt Disney Company

ABC, ESPN, Disney Channel, movie studios, and radio stations

Page 25: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

News Corporation

FNC, Fox network, worldwide satellite TV, Wall Street Journal, NY Post, and HarperCollins

Page 26: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Bertelsmann

Major American book publishers such as Knopf, Doubleday, and Random House

Reinhard Mohn

Page 27: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

General Electric

NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, television stations, Telemundo and cable channels such as Bravo

Page 28: Media concentration Is it harming democracy? Or are worries overblown?

Tracking media monopolies

• Columbia Journalism Review has an online tool at www.cjr.org/resources