8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
1/63
GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES Mechanical Methods
Dr. M. [email protected]
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
2/63
Mechanical Methods Compaction, Impact, Dynamic Vibro-flotation and Vibro-replacement
Stone Column Explosives
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
3/63
A. MECHANICAL METHODS Choice of Method
PurposeCompactionShallow Surface CompactionDeep Compaction- Dynamic Consolidation- Vibro Compaction- Vibro replacement
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
4/63
CHOICE OF METHOD- Type & degree of improvement required
- Type of soil, geological structure- Cost- Available equipment
- Time- Damage to adjacent structures- Durability (whole life considerations)
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
5/63
PURPOSE
- Increase shear strength- Reduce compressibility- Reduce liquefaction- Control swelling/ shrinkage- Prolong durability
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
6/63
What is compaction? A simple ground improvement technique,
where the soil is densified through externalcompactive effort.
+ water =
Compactiveeffort
1-Compaction
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
7/637
- to obtain the compaction curve and define the optimum water content
and maximum dry density for a specific compactive effort.
hammerStandard Proctor: Modified Proctor:
3 layers
25 blows per layer
5 layers
25 blows per layer
2.7 kg hammer
300 mm drop
4.9 kg hammer
450 mm drop
1000 ml compaction mould
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
8/63
Compaction - Procedure
1
2
3
4
5
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
9/63
Variation of Dry Density With Water
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
10/6310 Water content
D r y
d e n s i t y
( d
)
optimum water
content
d, max
Soil grains densely packed
- good strength and stiffness
- low permeability
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
11/63
Compaction Effect
Solids
Air
Water
Solids
Air
Water
Loose soil Compacted soil
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
12/63
12
All compaction points should lie to the left
of ZAV curve
- corresponds to 100% saturation
Water content
D r y
d e n s i
t y (
d )
Zero air void curve (S=100%)
s
w sd
wG
G
1 :Eq
S100% (impossible)
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
13/63
Lower optimumwater contentHigher maximumdry density
13
Increasing compactiveeffort results in:
E1
E2 (>E 1)
Water content
D r y
d e n s i
t y (
d )
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
14/63
14
Higher water content or highercompactive effort gives more dispersedfabric.
more dispersed fabric
m o r e
d i s p
e r s e
d f a b r i c
Water content
D r y
d e n s i
t y (
d )
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
15/63
15 Water content
D r y
d e n s i t y
( d
)
Compaction curves fordifferent efforts
Line of optimum
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
16/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
17/63
Compaction Advantages
As compaction increases, the following occurs: Increase soil strength Increase bearing capacity Decrease potential for settlement Control undesirable volume changes Reduction in hydraulic conductivity
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
18/63
Top from left: Gridroller, vibratory plates,vibrating roller andpneumatic rubber roller.
Bottom from left:Smooth-wheeled roller,power rammer andsheepsfoot roller.
SHALLOW SURFACE COMPACTION
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
19/63
Field Compaction
19
Compacts effectively only to 200-300 mm; therefore, place the soil inshallow layers (lifts)
Smooth Wheeled Roller
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
20/63
Field Compaction
20
for compacting very MHll areas
Vibrating Plates
effective for granular soils
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
21/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
22/63
Field Compaction
22
Provides deeper (2-3m) compaction. e.g., air field
Impact Roller
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
23/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
24/63
Type of Plant Suitability UnsuitableSmooth-wheeled roller Well graded sand and gravels;
silts and clays of low plasticity.Uniform sands; siltysands; soft clays.
Grid roller Well graded sand and gravels;soft rocks; stony cohesivesoils
Uniform sands; siltysands; soft clays.
Sheepsfoot roller Sands and gravels with morethan 20 % fines; most finegrained soils
Very coarse-grainedsoils; gravels withoutfines.
Pneumatic-tyred roller Most coarse-grained and fine-grained soils
Very soft clay; soils ofhighly variableconsistency
Vibrating roller Sands and gravels with no
fines; wet cohesive soils
Silts and clays; soils
with 5 % or morefines; dry soils.
Vibrating plates Soils with up to 12 15 %fines; confined areas.
Large-volume work
Power rammer Trench backfill; work in small
areas or where access isrestricted.
Large-volume work
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
25/63
Compaction Control Test
compacted ground
d,field = ?
wfield = ?
Compactionspecifications
Compare!
w
d
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
26/63
Dynamic Compaction
Pounder (Tamper)Mass = 5-30 tonne
Drop = 10-40 m
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
27/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
28/63
Dynamic Compaction
- pounding the ground by a heavy weight
Suitable for granular soils, land fills andkarst terrain with sink holes.
Crater created by the impact
Pounder (Tamper)solution cavities inlimestone
(to be backfilled)
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
29/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
30/63
DEEP COMPACTION TECHNIQUES
Dynamic Compaction Applications- Reduce foundation settlements- Reduce seismic subsidence- Permit construction on fills- Densify garbage dumps
- Improve mine spoils- Induce settlements in collapsible soils
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
31/63
Dynamic Compaction
Used for cohesive and cohesionless soils
Compacting buried refuse Not done by dropping weight randomly
Closely spaced grid pattern Preliminary work done to determine: Grid spacing Weight Height Number of drops (typ. 5 to 10 drops per grid point)
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
32/63
Dynamic Compaction
Applicable Loose sands, fills, mine refuse, collapsible soil and
sanitary landfills Up to depths of 40-feet Not typically used in urban areas 25-50 meters clearance to any structure
GWT > 6 below grade or 2 below bottom ofcraters
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
33/63
Dynamic Compaction
Advantages Relatively inexpensive
Disadvantages Extremely invasive Multiple passes required / progressive
consolidation Granular fill to stabilize loose surface soils Too many drops may cause adjacent heave Requires careful monitoring
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
34/63
Dynamic Compaction
Practical Considerations Drops from 10-40 meters
Weight 40(+) tons; shape doesnt matter Stratographic profiling for tamping pattern Max economic limit = 10 drops/location Requires horizontal pumps or drains Vibration sensitivity analysis recommended Crane Safety Program
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
35/63
Important Terms
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
36/63
Important Terms
Effective Depth -- Maximum depth of ground improvementZone of Major Densification -- About upper 2/3 of effectivedepthEnergy Level -- Energy per blow (weight times drop height)Energy Intensity Factor -- Involves energy level, spacing, andnumber of blows
Typical Dynamic Compaction ProgramInvolves
Weights of 10 to 30 tons Drop heights of 17m to 35 m Impact grids of 2.5 x 2.5 m to 7.0 x 7.0 m
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
37/63
Applied Energy Requirements
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
38/63
pp gy q
Li i i
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
39/63
Limitation
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
40/63
Suitability of Deposits for Dynamic Compaction
Dynamic Compaction Design Steps
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
41/63
Dynamic Compaction Design Steps 1. Perform site investigation
2. Develop settlement influence diagrams3. Develop initial Dynamic Compaction program4. Develop numerical performance prediction5. Develop QA/QC plans
Dynamic Compaction Performance Prediction Requires
Depth of influence of dynamic
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
42/63
Depth of influence of dynamiccompaction
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
43/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
44/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
45/63
Dynamic Compaction Acceptance Testing
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
46/63
y p p g
Large-Scale Load Test (where CPT & SPT are unreliablei.e. construction rubble and cobbles)
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) Pressuremeter Test (PMT) Dilatometer Test (DMT) Shear-Wave Velocity Profile
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
47/63
Explosive compaction
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
48/63
48
Aftermath of blastingFireworks?
For densifying granular soils
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
49/63
A Ground Improvement Technique
First used in 1936 (unsuccessfully)
Generally used to improve density of silty sands-sandy gravels (non-cohesive soils)
Makes use of dynamic/undrained loading conditions
to cause liquefaction-induced settlement
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
50/63
The Mechanism
Sudden dynamic loading breaks cohesionand any cementation
Shockwave temporarily liquefies soil layer Settlement occurs as Du 0
Typical vertical strain between 2% and 10%(Narin Van Court, 1995; GeoDesign, 2002)
Principle
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
51/63
Aftermath of blastingFireworks?
For densifying granular soils
Detonation of the explosives in a predetermined pattern causes liquefaction, followedby the expulsion of pore water and subsequent densification of the ground (Mitchell,1970). Gas and water escape to the surface forming sand boils, but cratering can beavoided by a suitable arrangement of the explosives.
Principle
D fi iti
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
52/63
Definition* Explosion or blasting is the process of detonating small charges within
loose cohesionless soils for the purpose of densification.
* Used to modify loose sands, rock, special soils (increase density index to0.7 0.8) (loess), (soils with open skeletons)
Action shear stresses breaks down soil structure
reorientation of particles volumetric reduction (up to 10%)
saturated soil temp. high pore pressure liquifaction (@ use vertical drains)
Caution - do not cause local slips
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
53/63
A Basic Procedural Overview
1. Site Investigation2. Survey3. Drill, Set Charges, and Blast
1. Survey, Further Site Investigation2. (Repeat 3, 4 if further settlement is required)
The usual procedure for blasting is as follows:* Jet or otherwise install a pipe to the required depth* Home the explosive charge* Withdraw the pipe* Backfill the bale* Fire the charge.
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
54/63
Why Blast?
Inexpensive Compare to remove/ replace ordynamic compaction, grouting, etc.
Improves soil atdepth
Maximum depth implemented: 40m
Low impact tosurroundings
Controlled blasts leave nearbystructures unaffected
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
55/63
1936 Russian Railway 1940 Franklin Falls Dam,
NH
1954-62 Karnafuli River,Kaptai, Bangladesh
1983 Jebba Dam, NigerRiver, Nigeria
1990s: Sakhalin Island,Russia
1990 Westover Airpark,
Chicopee, MA 1992 Coldwater Creek, Mt.
St. Helens, WA 2002 Westover AFB,
Chicopee, MA
Notable Field Applications
(Gandhi et al, 1999; Shakti, 2002; GeoDesign, 2002)
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
56/63
Three to five detonations are usual Figure 1 0 illustrates ground settlement as a
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
57/63
Three to five detonations are usual. Figure 1.0 illustrates ground settlement as afunction of the number of charges, based on Prugh (1963), 000 also suggested that thefirst firing (marker 1) caused 50 per cent settlement, the second (marker 2) 25 percent, the third 15 per cent, the fourth 5 per cent. Kummeneje and Eide (1961)
contradict this opinion, finding that similar settlements occurred after each detonation(Figure 2.0). A typical firing pattern for pad footings is shown on Figure 3.0. To assistthe densification process, a 1.0 m surcharge should be used in conjunction with the
blasting, but the upper 1-2 m of the ground is not compacted and will requirereplacement and compaction in layers using a vibrating roller.
Mitchell (1970) suggested that piezometers should be used to monitor pore-water pressures during the blasting operations.
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
58/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
59/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
60/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
61/63
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
62/63
Excess pore pressures & settlement are related to the ratio.
8/14/2019 Mechanical method for soil compaction
63/63
N h = Hopkins No.W = wt. of explosive (kg TNT)R = radial dist. of points of explosive m.
R
W N
h
3/1
where N h < 0.09 0.15 ;little or no liquefaction safe distance from explosion
To treat a given thickness of soil, H, with single detonation with spacing of holes, S ;
5.1055.0
3 H W
S = 2R = 2K 3
W
Values of K depend on grain size distribution and initial density