Top Banner
Mechanical Design  Anne Bergeron Mechanical Engineer SAIC [email protected]
97

Mechanical Design Final

Apr 10, 2018

Download

Documents

Hatem Kaldas
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 1/97

Mechanical Design

 Anne Bergeron

Mechanical Engineer 

SAIC

[email protected]

Page 2: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 2/97

Page 3: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 3/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Work 

Work = Force * Distance Example: The arm weighs 10 lbs and moves 3 ft vertically. The

mechanism that contains the balls weighs 5 lbs. The balls weigh 3 lbs.

The mechanism and balls move 6 ft vertically.

(use the center point of object to determine distance)

6 ft

3 ft

lb ft 

 ft lblb ft lb

d  F d  F 

d  F Work 

!

!

!

!

78

6)35(310

2211

Page 4: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 4/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Power 

Power = Work / Time

= (Force * Distance) / Time

= Force * Velocity

= Torque * Angular Velocity

POWER IS LIMITED!!!!!

Example: Desire the motion to be completed in 3 seconds.

watts

lb ft 

wattslb ft time

w

ork  Pow

er 

3.35

min

02259697.0

min

sec60

sec3

78/

!

!

!

Page 5: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 5/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Motor Characteristics

Stall Torque

Highest amount of torque a motor cangenerate, the motor will be stalled with this

much load. Stall Current

 Amount of current drawn when motor is stalled

Free Speed

Speed of motor under no load, fastest speed Motor Power 

How much mechanical power a motor has

Page 6: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 6/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Speed-Torque Cur ve

Speed

Stall Torque

(T0)

Free Speed

(Wf)

K (slope)

Page 7: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 7/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Current-Torque Cur ve

Torque

Max breaker 

current

Max

Design

Torque

Stall current

Page 8: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 8/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Power-Torque Cur ve

TorqueMax

design

torque

Max

Power 

Page 9: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 9/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Combined Motor Cur ves

Torque

Speed-Torque

Current-Torque

Power-Torque

Maxbreaker 

current

Page 10: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 10/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Motor Equation

Use to get better 

estimates from graph

Equation form: Y=mX+b

Calculate the slope, m:

Substitutions:

 f   f   W 

 X Slope 00

0

0 !

!

(

(!

Speed

T0

Wf 

K

0T  speed W 

T Torque

 f  

o

!

Page 11: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 11/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Motor Exam ples

T0 Wf A0 Af Pmax T40 W40

N-m RPM Amps Amps Watts N-m RPM

Chiaphua 2.45 5,342 114 2.4 342.6 0.80 4,045 

Johnson F-P 0.38 15,000 57 1.1 149.2 0.20 7,245 

Bosch Drill 0.87 19,670 127 4.5 448.0 0.25 13,970 

Motor

Motor Equations:

1. 2002-04 Chiaphua: T = (-2.45/5,342) * W + 2.45

2. 2003 Fisher-Price: T = (-0.38/15,000) * W + 0.38

3. 2003-04 Bosch Drill: T = (-0.87/19,670) * W + 0.87

0T  speed W 

T Torque

 f  

o

!

Page 12: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 12/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Figuring out gear ratios

Example:  A robot is to be designed to have a top

speed of 8 ft/sec. The robot will have 4 wheels that

have a diameter of 8 in and will be using one CIM

motor for each pair of wheels. Find the needed gear ratio.

Page 13: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 13/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ste p one: Gather inf o

Given:

Wheel diameter(d) = 8 in = 0.67 ft

Robot speed (V) = 8 ft/sec

Motor info:

CIM use a 40 amp breaker 

Look at graphs or use formula to find

following: T40 = 0.80 N-m = 0.59 ft-lb

W40 = 4045 rpm

Page 14: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 14/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ste p two: Find wheel revolutions

Find distance traveled per revolution of 

wheel:

Get wheel revolution needed for desired

speed:

rev

 ft d  P  Perimeter  104.2

2

2)( !! T 

min12.228

sec802.3

104.2

sec8

)(

revrev

rev

 ft 

 ft 

 P 

V W Wheelspeed 

w

!!

!

!

Page 15: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 15/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ste p 3: Find needed gear ratio

Find ratio to get speed of motor to speedrequired by wheel:

Motor speed (W40) = 4045 rpm

Required wheel speed = 228.12 rpm

This ratio can be achieved using one 17:1ratio or a combination of smaller steps.

 Additional steps are multiplied.

17228

404540!!!

rp

rp

W ratio

w

Page 16: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 16/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ste p 4: Calculate Force

Find the torque at the wheel:

Find force due to torque per wheel:

lb ft lb ft r atioT T w

!!! 03.101759.040

lb

in

 ft in

lb ft  R

 F w

w 09.30

12

1403.10 !

!!

Page 17: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 17/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ste p 5: Pushing f orce

Get the wheel max friction force (=1) which isequal to the max contact force (weight):

Find torque needed for pushing force:

Greater than torque of motors so not pushingbot.

w pushing 

 pushing 

 pushing 

 pushing 

lb ft 

lb

in

 ft in

 F d 

u

!

!

!

83.10

5.32

12

1

2

8

2max

lblb

n

weight  F 

wheels

5.32

4

130)1(max !!! Q

Page 18: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 18/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

More  possi bilities

The same procedure can also be followed using

Torque or Power as the starting points.

Can use the wanted pushing force as starting point

Helps to know the coefficient of friction

Iterations will be needed.

Multiply in efficiencies when # of stages determined

Recalculate with actual ratios This can also be used to calculate ratios for 

manipulators as well.

Page 19: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 19/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Gear Ty pes and Efficiency

Previous calculations were done under ideal

conditions.

 Add efficiency in calculation by multiplying in

with ratio

Spur gears

Efficiency ~ 95% - 98%

Page 20: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 20/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Gear Ty pes and Efficiency (cont.)

Chain and Sprockets

Efficiency ~ 95% - 98%

Belt and Pulley

Efficiency ~ 85%-98% (timing belt best)

Page 21: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 21/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Bevel Gears

Efficiency ~ 90% - 95%

Worm Gears

Efficiency ~ 40%-70%

Gear Ty pes and Efficiency (cont.)

Page 22: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 22/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ordering Gears

Remember clearances

Match

Pitch

Pressure angle Good Sources

McMaster Carr 

Boston Gear 

MSC

Pic-Design

Ord er ear ly!!! 

Page 23: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 23/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ordering Wheels

Skyway Wheels (www.skywaywheels.com)

 AndyMark (www.andymark.biz)

Page 24: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 24/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ty pical Drive Train

Co

nfigurat

io

ns 2 powered wheels, 2 castors

Page 25: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 25/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ty pical Drive Train

Co

nfigurat

io

ns (co

nt

.) 4 wheels, several configurations:

4 motors

2 motors

2 gear boxes

2 powered wheels

4 powered wheels

Page 26: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 26/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ty pical Drive Train

Co

nfigurat

io

ns (co

nt

.) Threads

Page 27: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 27/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ty pical Drive Train

Co

nfigurat

io

ns (co

nt

.) 2 centered wheels

Page 28: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 28/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ty pical Drive Train

Co

nfigurat

io

ns (co

nt

.) Swerve

Page 29: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 29/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

A ppendages

 Articulating Arms

Telescoping Lifts

Grippers

Latches

 Accumulators

Page 30: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 30/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m Design

³ Arm´: device for grabbing & moving objects using

members that rotate about their ends

Thin Walled Tubing (1/16) is your friend

Every Pivot has to be engineered reduce, reuse, recycle ;-)

Pivots on Pivots are confusing to drivers

4 bars linkages help control end of arm

Think about operator interface ± very important

Page 31: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 31/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m Advice

Don¶t make it over-complicated

Feedback Control is HUGE

Measure Current Position (potentiometers)

Set Desired Position

Calculate Error 

Take Action Based on Error (Search Internet

for P

ID control) Install limits

Design-in sensors from the start of design

Page 32: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 32/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Four Bar LinkagePin Loadings can  be very high

Watch f or  buckling in lower member 

Counter  balance if you can

Kee p CG af t

Page 33: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 33/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m Exam ple: 67 in 2001

Page 34: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 34/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m Exam ple: 234 in 2001

Page 35: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 35/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m Exam ple: 71 in 2004

Page 36: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 36/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m Contrast: 45 in ¶04-¶05

Page 37: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 37/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m Exam ple: 330 in 2005

Page 38: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 38/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Telesco ping Lif ts

Extension Lift

Scissor Lift

Page 39: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 39/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Extension

Page 40: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 40/97

Page 41: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 41/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Extension - Rigging

Continuous Cascade

Page 42: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 42/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Extension: Continuous Rigging

Cable Goes Same Speed

for Up and Down

Intermediate Sections

sometimes Jam

Low Cable Tension

More complex cable

routing

The final stage moves up

first and down last

Slider 

(Stage3)

Stage2

Stage1

Base

Page 43: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 43/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Extension: Continuous Internal Rigging

Even More complex cable

routing

Cleaner and protected

cables

Slider 

(Stage3)

Stage2

Stage1

Base

Page 44: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 44/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Extension: Cascade Rigging

Up-going and Down-goingCables Have DifferentSpeeds

Different Cable Speeds Canbe Handled with Different

Drum Diameters or MultiplePulleys

Intermediate Sections Don¶tJam

Much More Tension on thelower stage cables

Needs lower gearing todeal with higher forces

I do not prefer this one!

Slider 

(Stage3)

Stage2

Stage1

Base

Page 45: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 45/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Lif t Exam ple 111 (1997)

Page 46: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 46/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Lif t Exam ple 213 (2001)

Page 47: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 47/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Scissor Lif t

Page 48: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 48/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Scissor Lif t Considerations

 Advantages

Minimum retracted height - cango under field barriers

Disadvantages

Tends to be heavy to be stable

enough Doesn¶t deal well with side

loads

Must be built very precisely

Stability decreases as heightincreases

Loads very high to raise atbeginning of travel

I recommend you stay awayfrom this!

Page 49: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 49/97

Page 50: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 50/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Ar m vs. Lif t

Feature Arm Lift

Reach over object Yes No

Fall over, get back up Yes, if strong enough No

Go under barriers Yes, fold down No, limits lift potential

Center of gravity (Cg) Can move it out from

over robot

Much mass, but central

Confided space operation No, needs swing room Yes

How high? More articulations, more

height (difficult)

More lift sections, more

height (easier)

Complexity Moderate High

 Accumulation 1 or 2 at a time Many objects

Combination Insert 1-stage lift at

bottom of arm

Page 51: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 51/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Braking: Prevent Back-driving

Ratchet Device - completely lock in one direction in discrete

increments - such as used in many winches

Clutch Bearing - completely lock in one direction

Brake pads - simple device that squeezes on a rotating device

to stop motion - can lock in both directions Disc brakes - like those on your car 

Gear brakes - applied to lowest torque gear in gearbox

Note : any gearbox that cannot be back-driven is probably very

inefficient

Page 52: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 52/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Power 

Summary

 All motors can lift the same amount (assuming

100% power transfer efficiencies) - they just

do it at different rates BUT, no power transfer mechanisms are

100% efficient

Inefficiencies (friction losses, binding, etc.)

Design in a Safety Factor (2x, 4x)

Page 53: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 53/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Gri ppers

Gripper = grabbing game object

How to grip

How to hang on

Speed

Control

Page 54: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 54/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

How to gri p

Pneumatic linkage grip

1 axis

2 axis

Motorized grip Roller grip

Hoop grip

Pneumatic grip

Page 55: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 55/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Pneumatic linear gri p

Pneumatic

Cylinder 

extends &

retracts

linkage to

open and

close gripper 

254 robot:

2004, 1-axis

968 robot:

2004, 1-axis

Recommended

Page 56: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 56/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Pneumatic linear gri p

Pneumatic

Cylinder,

pulling 3fingers for a

2-axis grip

60 in 2004

Recommended

Page 57: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 57/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Motorized Linear Gri p

Slow

More complex

(gearing)

Heavier  Doesn¶t use

pneumatics

49 in 2001

Notrecommended

Page 58: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 58/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

R oller Gri p

Slow

 Allows for 

misalignment

when grabbing

Won¶t let go

Extends object as

releasing

Simple

mechanism

45 in 98 and 2004

Recommended

Page 59: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 59/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

R oller Gri p Exam ple 45 (1998)

Page 60: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 60/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

R oller Gri p Exam ple 121 (1998)

Page 61: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 61/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Hoo p gri p

Slow

Needs

aligned

Can¶t hold onwell

5 in 2000

Not

recommended

Page 62: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 62/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Pneumatic Gri p

Vacuum:

generator &cups to grab

Slow

Not secure

Not easy tocontrol

Simple

ProblematicNot

recommended

Page 63: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 63/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Hang on!

Friction: High is needed (over 1.0 mu)

Rubber, neoprene, silicone, sandpaper 

Force: Highest at grip point

Force = multiple x object weight (2-4x)

Linkage, toggle: mechanical advantage

Extra axis of grip = More control

Best grip = roller gripper 

Page 64: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 64/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Speed

Quickness covers mistakes

Quick to grab

Drop & re-grab

292 example

Fast

Pneumatic gripper 

Not fast Roller, motor gripper, vacuum

Page 65: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 65/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Gri p contr ol

Holy grail of gripping:

Get object fast

Hang on

Let go quickly

This must be done under excellent control

Limit switches

 Auto-functions Ease of operation

Page 66: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 66/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Latches

Spring latches

Hooks / spears

Speed & Control

Page 67: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 67/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Latch exam ple: 267 

Pneumatic Latch

2001 game

Grabs pipe

No ³smart

mechanism´

Page 68: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 68/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Latch exam ple: 469 

Spring-loaded

latch

Motorized

release

Smart

Mechanism

2003

Page 69: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 69/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Latch exam ple: 118

Spring-loaded

latch

Pneumatic

release

Smartmechanism

2003

Page 70: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 70/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Latching advice

Don¶t depend on operator to latch, use asmart mechanism

Spring loaded (preferred)

Sensor met and automatic command given Have a secure latch

Use an operated mechanism to let go

Be able to let go quickly

Pneumatic lever  Motorized winch, pulling a string

Page 71: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 71/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Accumulation

 Accumulator = rotational device that pulls objects in

Types:

Horizontal tubes - best for gathering balls from floor or 

platforms

Vertical tubes - best for sucking or pushing balls between

vertical goal pipes

Wheels - best for big objects where alignment is pre-

determined

When it comes to gathering balls, there is nothing

more efficient

If set up in the proper orientation, will not knock the ball

away, just suck it in

Page 72: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 72/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Conveying & Gathering

Conveyor - device for moving multiple objects,typically within your robot

Types:

Continuous Belts

Best to use 2 running at same speed to avoid jamming Individual Rollers

best for sticky balls that will usually jam on belts andeach other 

When it comes to gathering balls, there is nothing

more efficient If set up in the proper orientation, will not knock the ball

away, just suck it in

Page 73: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 73/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Conveyors

Why do  balls jam on  belts?

- Sticky and ru b against each

other as they try to r otate

along the conveyor 

Solution #1- Use individual r ollers

- Adds weight and com plexity

Solution #2

- Use  pairs of  belts

- Increases size and com plexity

Solution #3

- Use a sli ppery material f or the non-

moving surface (Teflon sheet works

great)

Page 74: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 74/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

R oller exam ple: 111

Page 75: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 75/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Accumulator exam ple: 173 & 47

Page 76: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 76/97

Pneumatics

Page 77: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 77/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Pneumatics vs. MotorsSome,  but not all im por tant differences

Cylinders use up their power source rather quickly

the 2 air tanks we are allowed do not hold much

Motors use up very little of the total capacity of the battery

Cylinders are great for quick actuations that transition to largeforces

Motors have to be geared for the largest forces Our ability to control the position of mechanisms actuated by

cylinders is very limited

We are not given dynamic airflow or pressure controls

We are given much more versatile electronic controls for motors

Since air is compressible, cylinders have built-in shockabsorption

Cylinders used with 1-way valves are great for Armageddondevices - stuff happens when power is shut off 

This could be good or bad - use wisely

Page 78: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 78/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Com ponents

Compressor 

Pressure gages

Helps diagnose

problems

Cylinders

custom sizes

Flow controls

Page 79: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 79/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Com ponents (cont.)

Tanks

Regulators

60 PSI

Relieving At least one

required after tanks

Inlet labeled

Solenoid Valves

Page 80: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 80/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Fittings

Flow Control

Plug Valve

Page 81: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 81/97

Com pressor 

Gage

Regulator 

Valve

Tank 

Tank Relay

Contr ol

System

Fuse

Box

Piston

Page 82: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 82/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Layout of Test Board

Page 83: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 83/97

Page 84: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 84/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Wiring Solenoids

Single Solenoid

Connect the red to M+ of relay

Connect the black to M- of relay

Double Solenoid (as two singles)

Double Solenoid+

-

Single Solenoid

M+

M-

Single Solenoid

Page 85: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 85/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Dou ble Solenoid

Double Solenoid

M+ M-

Double Solenoid

M+

M- M-

M+

Page 86: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 86/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Pistons

Several sizes available

Bore sizes: ¾´, 1 ½´, 2´

Stroke Lengths: ½´ to 12´

Force= Pressure * Area

Stroke length

Stroke Length

Bore

Size

Page 87: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 87/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Forces

Page 88: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 88/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Basic Mechanical Ti ps

Know your limitations Machining

Design

KISS

Keep track of weight Spreadsheet

Estimates and actuals

Include materials

Have 5-10 pound buffer 

 Assign per subsystem

Get a good scale Think about maintenance during design

 Access to parts

Determine high maintenance parts

Page 89: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 89/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Keep the center of gravity low

Battery/Compressor 

Wheel Base

Prototype ideas

Create design drawings

2D or 3D

CAD or paper 

Keep at building site

Standardize hardware

Metric or standard

1-2 Sizes (1/4´-20, 10-32)

Lots of lengths

Basic Mechanical Ti ps (cont.)

Page 90: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 90/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Basic Mechanical Ti ps (cont.)

 Avoid set screws

Too much traction can be bad

Be aware of robot systems when drilling or 

machining parts on the robot Avoid cantilevered shafts

 Avoid stalling your motors

Use the right tool for the job

Key

Pin

Screw

Screw

Shaft 

Page 91: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 91/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Basic Mechanical Ti ps (cont.)

Make spares

Get a base and drive train done quickly

Don¶t forget about pneumatics

Page 92: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 92/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Structural Material

Metals

Iron

Steel

 Aluminum

Forms

Extruded

Plating

 Angle

Tubing Circular 

Square

Wood

Fiberglass

Lexan (no Plexiglass)

Carbon fiber 

Page 93: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 93/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Pr ofiles

Angle: 1´x1´  1/8´ thick 

Square:

1´x1´

 1/16´

 t

hick Same weight, much more strength and stiffness

Takes more s pace

Extruded: 1´x1´  1/16´ 

thick 

Heavier, much more strength and stiffness

Takes more s pace

Easy to assemble and connect to

Page 94: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 94/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Extruded

Item America www.itemamerica.com

80/20 www.8020.net

Bosh www.boschrextroth.com IPS www.industrialprofile.com

Page 95: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 95/97

Questions?Thanks to:

 Andy Baker (45)

Chris Hussman (330)

Joe Johnson (47)

Raul Olivera (111)www.chiefdelphi.com

www.firstrobotics.net

www.firstrobotics.uwaterloo.ca

Page 96: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 96/97

 Anne Bergeron2005 Chesapeake Enrichment Sessions

Activity

The Task:

Design a robot drive train using AndyMark

gearbox.

Specifications:

Robot Speed= 8 ft/sec

Use 4 Chiaphua motors (Chip) Weight of robot=130 lbs

Page 97: Mechanical Design Final

8/8/2019 Mechanical Design Final

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/mechanical-design-final 97/97

Ste ps

Decide on a wheel size

Find gear ratio needed from gearbox towheels

Calculate the pushing force of robot

Is it a pushing robot?

Conversion factors: 1 oz-in = 0.0052083 pound foot