Page 1
Measurements of thermal photons in heavy ion collisions
with PHENIX- Torsten Dahms -
Stony Brook University
February 8th, 2008
Real photons at low pT
• Production mechanisms• Traditional EMCal
measurement• Tagging• Beam pipe conversions
Real photons at low pT
• Production mechanisms• Traditional EMCal
measurement• Tagging• Beam pipe conversions
Virtual photons• Production mechanisms• Background• Au+Au and long awaited p+p results
Virtual photons• Production mechanisms• Background• Au+Au and long awaited p+p results
see poster by Y. Yamaguchi (P125)
High pT photons see talk by K. Miki (XV)
Page 2
2008-02-08 2
Direct Photons• Direct photon sources:
– QCD Compton scattering
– Annihilation
– QCD Bremsstrahlung
• Hard photons from inelastic scattering of incoming partons
• Thermal photons are emitted via same processes but from thermalized medium carry information about the temperature of the medium
T
1np
hard:
/ E Tethermal:
Decay photons(0→, →, …)
γqqg
γgqq
Page 3
2008-02-08 3
Thermal photons?
No significant excess at low pT
Conventional method:• Measure inclusive photons
γincl = γdecay + γdirect
• Calculate double ratio:(γincl/π0)measured / (γdecay/ π0)background = γincl/ γdecay =1+ γdirect/ γdecay
• If double ratio > 1 direct photons
• high pT excess consistent with pQCD• Run4: more statistics, but still no
conclusive measurement• Limited by detector resolution and
neutral hadron contamination
Page 4
2008-02-08 4
Clean Photon Sample• Method I:
– Only use EMCal clusters which fulfill very strict PID cuts• Method II:
– Identify conversion photons in beam pipe using their orientation w.r.t. the magnetic field
– Additional advantage: • very good momentum resolution of charged tracks at low pT
• No detector artifacts– But statistics limited due to small X0
• Combining these photon with others measured in EMCAL with loose PID cut tag photons coming from π0 decays
• Correct for missing π0 decay partners• Subtract η, ω, η’ decay photons• Calculate ratio Nγ
incl/N γdecay
• Uses very pure photon sample• avoid explicit calculation of π0 spectrum reduce systematic uncertainties
no pair cutwith pair cut
Dal
itz
Conversions
Conversion pairs from π0 decaysConversion pairs from π0 decays
γe+e- tripletsγe+e- triplets
Page 5
2008-02-08 5
Results in Au+Au
• Agreement of all three results within their errors
• There seems to be an excess above the decay photons at low pT
Page 6
2008-02-08 6
Compton
q
g q
Compton
q
g q
e+
e-
phase space factorform factorinvariant mass of virtual photon
invariant mass of Dalitz pair
phase space factorform factorinvariant mass of Dalitz pair
invariant mass of virtual photon
32
222
2
2
2
2
)1()(1
)2
1(4
13
21
M
mmF
mm
m
m
m
dm
dN
Nee
eeeeee
e
ee
e
ee
ee
ee
ee
dm
dN
N
1
Virtual Photons
32
2
)1(M
meeeeee
e
ee
e
mm
m
m
m 1)
21(
41
3
22
2
2
2
22 )( eemF
• Start from Dalitz decay
• Calculate inv. mass distribution of Dalitz pairs
• Now direct photons
• Any source of real produces
virtual with very low mass
• Rate and mass distribution given by same formula
– No phase space factor for mee<< pT
photon
• Improved S/B by measuring direct photon signal in mass region in which π0 are suppressed
0
0
e+
e-
Page 7
2008-02-08 7
The Data• 800M MinBias Au+Au events• 2.25pb-1 of triggered p+p data as
reference• Material conversion pairs
removed by analysis cut• Combinatorial background
removed by mixed events (0.25% syst. uncertainty in Au+Au)
• additional correlated background:– cross pairs from decays with four
electrons in the final state– particles in same jet (low mass)– or back-to-back jet (high mass)
• well understood from MC
π0
π0
e+
e-
e+
e-
γ
γ
π0
e-
γ
e+
p+p at √s = 200GeVp+p at √s = 200GeV
arXiv:0802.0050
Page 8
2008-02-08 8
Cocktail comparison
QM2005
• Results from Au+Au
QM2008
• long awaited result from p+p
• important confirmation of method
p+p
• Agreement of p+p data and hadronic decay cocktail
• Small excess in p+p at large mee and high pT
Au+Au
• data agree for mee <50MeV
• Clear enhancement visible above for all pT
1 < pT < 2 GeV2 < pT < 3 GeV3 < pT < 4 GeV4 < pT < 5 GeV
p+p Au+Au (MB)
PHENIX Preliminary
Page 9
2008-02-08 9
Shape Comparison• At m=0 Dalitz and internal conversion
pairs have indistinguishable shape• Shape differs as soon as π0 is
suppressed due to phase space limitation
• Assume internal conversions of direct photons
– Fix absolute normalization of cocktail and direct photons by normalizing to data in mee<30MeV
– Fit paramater r is fraction of direct photons
– Two component fit in80 < mee < 300MeV gives: χ2/DOF=11.6/10
• It’s not the η:– Independent measurement of η in
Au+Au fixes π0/η ratio to: 0.48 ± 0.08– Fit with eta shape gives:
χ2/DOF = 21.1/10)(mrf)(mr)f()f(m eedirecteecocktailee 1
Page 10
2008-02-08 10
Fraction of direct photons• Fraction of direct photons
• Compared to direct photons from pQCD
p+p
• Consistent with NLO pQCD
• favors small μ
Au+Au
• Clear excess above pQCD
μ = 0.5pT
μ = 1.0pT
μ = 2.0pT
μ = 0.5pT
μ = 1.0pT
μ = 2.0pT
p+p Au+Au (MB)
Page 11
2008-02-08 11
Comparison
• Agreement of all three methods within their errors
• Internal conversion method observes clear excess above decay photons
• Extract direct photon spectrum by multiplying with measured inclusive photon spectrum: Nγdirect = r · Nγinclusive
Page 12
2008-02-08 12
The spectrum• Compare spectra to NLO pQCDp+p• consistent with pQCDAu+Au• above binary scaled pQCD• If excess of thermal origin:
inverse slope is related to initial temperature
Page 13
2008-02-08 13
Conclusion
• Various techniques employed to measure direct photons at low pT
• Excess of real photons above decay background observed at low pT
• Measured excess in dielectron spectra– Shape consistent with internal conversions of
virtual photons– p+p in agreement with pQCD– Au+Au above pQCD
Page 15
2008-02-08 15
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
Page 16
2008-02-08 16
The PHENIX Experiment• Charged particle tracking:
– DC, PC1, PC2, PC3• Electron ID:
– Cherenkov light RICH– shower EMCal
• Photon ID:– shower EMCal
• Lead scintillator calorimeter (PbSc)• Lead glass calorimeter (PbGl)
– charged particle veto• Central arm physics
(|y|<0.35, p ≥ 0.2 GeV/c):– charmonium J/ψ, ψ’→ e+e-
– vector meson ρ, ω, φ → e+e- – high pT π0, π+, π-
– direct photons– open charm – hadron physics
• Two muon arms at forward rapidity (1.2 < |η| < 2.4, p 2 GeV/c)
e+e
• Measure rare probes in heavy ion collisions (e.g. Au+Au) as well as in p+p (+spin program)
Page 17
2008-02-08 17
Electron Identification• Charged particle tracking (δm: 1%)
DC, PC1, PC3• PHENIX optimized for Electron ID• Cherenkov light RICH + • shower EMCAL
• Emission and measurement of Cherenkov light in the Ring Imaging Cherenkov detector→ measure of min. velocity
• Production and of em. shower in the Electro-Magnetic Calorimeter measure of energy E
• Electrons: E ≈ p• Hadrons: E < p
Cerenkovphotons from e+ or e- are detected by array of PMTs
mirror
Most hadrons do not emit Cerenkov light
Electrons emit Cerenkovphotonsin RICH.
Central Magnet
RICH
PMT arrayPMT array
Cerenkovphotons from e+ or e- are detected by array of PMTs
mirror
Most hadrons do not emit Cerenkov light
Electrons emit Cerenkovphotonsin RICH.
Central Magnet
RICH
PMT arrayPMT array
RICH
Energy-Momentum
All charged tracks
Background
Net signal
RealRICH cut
Page 18
2008-02-08 18
0 signal extraction
Real events
Mixed event
•combine conversion pairs with all photons in EMCal
•BG subtraction within pT bins
•Normalized outside the π0 peak
Page 19
2008-02-08 19
In practice
0-30
• Material conversion pairs removed by analysis cut
• Combinatorial background removed by mixed events
• Calculate ratios of various mee bins to lowest one: Rdata
• If no direct photons: ratios correspond to Dalitz decays
• If excess: direct photons
• Fit of virtual photon shape to data in principle also possible(done for d+Au)
0
0
direct
data
incl.
direct
*
*
RR
RR
incl.
direct
÷
200-300 M
eV
÷
140-200
Rdata
÷
90-140
From conventional measurement
Page 21
2008-02-08 21
Low pT mass spectra