Top Banner
INTRODUCTION MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE N. M . Alem, R . L . Stalnaker, J . W . Melvin Highway Safety Research Institute Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S .A. Of great importance to quantitative evaluation of inj ury to the human head is the ability to describe the mechanical response of the head when subjected to direct impact. In the past fifteen years, great strides have been taken in this direction. Studies [l] have been made to evaluate the effects of trans- lationa l and rotational head motion on t he i njury patterns. Other studies [2] stressed the importance of brain pressurization during impact to the realistic reproduction of brain injuries . The lack of definitive impact-injury correlation is partly due to the failure to measure accurately the kine matics of head motion and the brain pres- sure fluctuations in a laboratory environment. Early research succeeded only in measuring planar head motion, either by use of acce lerometer pairs [3] or by photometric analyses [4]. These methods assumed that the head motion was essentially planar, and that the accelerometer pair or the film plane was parallel to the plane of motion. Un less the impact is conducted under high ly controlled environment, these assumptions are not valid. Only re cently were researchers in the field of biomechanics able to measure completely the general 3-D motion of the head under impact [5, 6 , 7]. Another important factor in successful experimenta l head injury research is the ability to use subjects which represent, as closely as possible , the living human head. lt was found [2] that the pressurized head of unembalmed cadaver provides the best surrogate to l i ving human head. The object of this paper is to describe the techniques used for meas ure- ment of: a) the fluctuation of the brain press ure� and b) the 3-0 kinematics of head motion. These techniques were developed over the last two years and have been applied successfu lly to measure head motions of anthr op ometric dummies and cadavers in non-impact car occupant sim ul ations [8] , and of fifteen cadaver head impacts [9] . PRESSURIZATION Brain vascular press urization was attempted in the early tests of o ur head impact research program with varying degrees of success. The technique was modified in the later phases of the program to produce more satisfactory re- sults . The technique described below is based on modification of the method developed by Fayon et al . [2] , and was found to produce satisfactory pressuri- zation of the brain. The catheter used for pumping fluid in the vascu l ar system consisted of a Foley balloon catheter in which the center section was replaced by suitable lengths af polyethylene tubing. Two tubes were necessary: one connected to the inlet end of the catheter for pressurizing, and another connected to the tip end of the catheter for bal loon inf lation. A smal l lead pellet was in- serted at the tip of the catheter for radiographic verification of its location
13

MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

Aug 01, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

I NTRODUCTI ON

MEASUREMENT OF HEAD I MPACT RESPONSE

N . M. A lem , R. L . Sta l naker , J . W . Mel v i n H i ghway Safety Research Insti tute Ann Arbor , Mi chi gan 481 09 U . S . A .

Of great i mportance to quanti tati ve eval uation o f i nj ury to the human head i s the abi l i ty to descri be the mechani cal response of the head when subjected to d i rect i mpact . I n the past fi fteen years , great s tri des have been taken i n th i s d i recti on . Studi es [ l ] have been made to eval uate the effects of trans­l ational and rotati onal head mot i on on the i njury patterns . Other stud i es [2] stressed the i mportance of bra i n pressuri zation duri ng i mpact to the rea l i sti c reproducti on of brai n i nj uries .

The l ack of defi n i t i ve i mpact- i nj ury correl ati on i s partly due to the fai l ure to measure accurately the ki nemat ics of head moti on and the bra i n pres­sure fl uctuati ons i n a l aboratory envi ronment . Early research succeeded only i n measuri ng pl anar head moti on , ei ther by use of accel erometer pai rs [3] or by photometri c analyses [4] . These methods assumed that the head motion was essenti a l ly p l a na r , and that the accel erometer pa i r or the fi l m pl ane was para l l el to the p l ane of moti on . Unle s s the i mpact i s conducted under h i gh ly contro l l ed envi ronment , these assumpti ons are not val i d . Only recently were researchers i n the fie l d of b iomechani cs abl e to measure compl etely the general 3- D mot i on of the head under i mpact [5 , 6 , 7 ] .

Another i mportant factor i n s uccessful experi mental head i nj ury research i s the abi l i ty to use s ubjects wh i ch represent , as c l ose ly as pos s i bl e , the l i vi ng human head . l t was found [2 ] that the pressuri zed head of unembalmed cadaver provi des the best s urrogate to l i vi ng human head .

The obj ect of th i s paper i s to describe the techni ques used for measure­ment of : a ) the fl uctuation of the bra i n pressure � and b ) the 3-0 ki nematics of head mot i on . These techniques were devel oped over the l as t two years and have been app l i ed s uccessfu l ly to measure head moti ons of anthropometri c dummies and cadavers i n non- i mpact car occupant s imul ati ons [8] , and of fi fteen cadaver head i mpacts [9 ] .

PRESSURI ZAT ION

Brai n vascul ar pressuri zati on was attempted i n the early tes ts of our head i mpact research program wi th varyi ng degrees of s uccess . The techn ique was modi fi ed i n the l ater phases of the program to produce more sati sfactory re­s u l ts . The techni que descri bed be l ow i s based on mod i fi cation of the method devel oped by Fayon et a l . [2] , and was found to produce sati s factory pressuri ­zation of the bra i n .

The catheter used for pumpi ng fl u i d i n the vascu l ar system cons i s ted of a Fol ey bal l oon catheter i n whi ch the center section was rep l aced by sui tab le l engths af polyethyl ene tubi ng . Two tubes were necessary : one connected to the i n l et end of the catheter for pressuri zi ng , and another connected to the tip end of the catheter for bal l oon i nfl ati on . A smal l l ead pel l et was i n­serted at the ti p of the catheter for radi ographi c veri fi cation of i ts l ocati on

Page 2: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

duri ng i nsert i on . To a l l ow the fl u i d to f low i nto the occl uded b l ood vessel s , ho l e s were made i n the end of the pressuri zati on tube j u st before the bal l oon .

I n order to measure oressure i n the i n ternal carotid artery a s close as pos s i b l e to the brai n , the bal l oon was i nserted through the carot i d artery and down i nto the descendi nq aorta j us t oast the branch of the l eft subcl avi an ar­tery to provi de for pressuri zation through both the l eft and right caroti d ar­teri es . One end of a s econd secti on of pol yethy l ene tub i ng was i nserted i nto the ascending aorta , whi l e the other end was i nserted i nto the i nterna l caro­t id artery . Fi nal l y , i n order to measure the vascu l ar pressure , a thi rd tube was i nserted i nto the i nternal carot id artery to a l l ow a mi ni ature Kul i te pres­sure transducer to be pl aced near the base of the brai n . Once a l l tubes have been pl aced i n the appropri ate arteri es , the caroti d i nc i s i on was sea l ed . The pressuri zati on fl u i d u sed was a mi xture of water and b l ack i nd i a i n k whi ch can eas i l y be i denti fied duri ng autopsy to mark ruptures due to impact .

Just before the impact test , the catheter bal l oon was i nfl ated to b l ock the descendi ng aorta . Then , u s i ng a 5- l i ter contai ner as the water i nk reser­voi r , th i s fl u i d was forced i nto the pressuri zati on tube by pumpi ng a i r i nto the fl u i d contai ner . The a i r p ressure was i ncreased unti l a s teady 1 20 mm Hg vascu l ar pressure was i ndi cated .

Thi s techni que was app l i ed to the l as t fi ve tests of a series of 1 5 head impact tests , and a l l fi ve oroduced satisfactory pressure readi ngs . The transducer output was recorded on ana l og tape , and l ater was d igi t i zed and fi l tered , then p lotted for exami nati on . Typi ca l press u re transducer outputs are shown i n Fi gure l , a l ong wi th the i mpact force appl i ed to the head .

LU

� 0 u..

TEST NO. 76A145

0 5 10 15 ms

TEST NO. 76A1 71

1 1 II 1 1 0 5 10

Fi gure l . Time h i s tories of i mpact force and resul ti ng vascul ar pressure for two head di rect i mpact tests .

15 ms

Page 3: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

HEAD MOTION

The method used by HSRI for comp l ete measurement of the general 3-D head motion i s based on a techni que used by Cal span [ 1 0 ] to measure the moti on of vehi cl es under s imul ated crashes .

The HSRI method uses 3 tri axi a l l i near accel erometers ri g id ly attached to the s ku l l at 3 arb itrary conveni ent poi nts . The readi ngs of the 9 i nd i v i dual �ccel erometers are mathemati cal l y man ipu l ated to produce a compl ete descri ption of the rigi d-body head moti on , whi ch cons i sts of time h i s tori es of angu lar ac­cel erati on and ve l oci ty vectors , the Eul er ang les and thei r time deri vati ves ( rates ) , the tran s l ati onal accel era ti on vector of any des i red head poi nt ( usu­a l ly the anatomi ca l center) expressed i n the anatomi cal and the l aboratory in­ert i a l reference frames , and fi na l l y , the trans l ati onal vel o c i ty and pos i ti on vectors of that point w i th respect to the fi xed l aboratory reference frame .

Thi s measurement system i nvol ves 3 reference frames : a ) the instrumentation frame ( e1 , e2 , e3 ) , defined by the l ocati ons and ori entati ons of the 3 tri axi al acce lerometers , wh ich i s embedded i n the movi ng head ; b ) the anatomica l refer­ence frame ( i , j , k ) defined by anatomica l l andmarks ( two i n fraorbi tal notches and two upper edges of the audi tory meati ) , i n whi ch the components of the an­gul ar acce l erat i on and vel oc i ty vectors wi l l be expressed ; and c) the l aborato­ry reference frame ( I ,J , K ) , assumed to be i nerti a l to whi ch the angu l ar ori en­tation of the head as wel l as i ts trans l ati onal accel erati on , ve l oci ty and po­s i t ion wi l l be referred .

Once a cadaver i s se l ected for an i mpact tes t , certai n procedures are fol ­l owed i n order to i n strument the head for 3-D moti on measurement . The total measurement protocol cons i s ts of four phases : a ) attach the accel erometer mounts ri g i dl y to the sku l l and a l i gn the sens i ti ve axes i n 3 orthogonal di rec­ti ons , b ) x- ray the head twi ce to determi ne the l ocati on and ori entation of the i nstrumentation frame ( e1 , e2 , e 3 ) wi th respect to the standard anatomi cal frame ( i , j , k ) , c) I n sta l l 9 accel erometers in thei r mounts , conduct the test , record the s i gna l s then di gi ti ze them for computer analys i s , and fi nal ly d ) perform computer cal cul at ion of 3-D head motion u s i ng the 9 d i gi ti zed s i gnal s together w i th the transformati on obtai ned from x- ray analys i s and the test i ni ti a l condi t i ons . The fol l owi ng secti ons descri be the methods used for phases a , b and d above .

ACCELEROMETER MOUNTING

Three s i tes on the s ku l l are sel ected away from the i n tended impact l oca­ti on , so that they prov ide the maximum separati on between the triaxi a l acce lero­meters . The s ca l p was l oca l ly removed expos ing the skul l whi ch i s then c l eaned and dri ed . For each moun t , 3 pi l o t ho les are dri l l ed i n the s ku l l , maki ng sure the bra i n was untouched , to a l l ow three screws to be attached to the skul l . A steel wi re i s wrapped around the 3 parti a l l y exposed screws formi ng an area where the accel erometer mount i s p l aced . I n order to ensure the orthogona l i ty of the sen s i t i ve axes of the accel erometers , a spec i a l a l umi num j i g , s hown i n fi gure 2 , i s p l aced over the 3 mounts wh i ch are then secured to the wi res and screws wi th dental acry l i c . The acryl i c i s a l l owed to harden for about 30 mi n­utes bef6re removing the j i g and l eavi ng the three mounts r ig id ly attached to the s kul l , as shown i n Fi gure 3 .

Page 4: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

Fi gure 2 . Spec i a l a l i gnment j i g used to i ns ure orthogonal i ty of 9 acce l erometers . and to measure d i stances from each tri axi a l mount to the ori g i n of the i nstrumentation reference system .

X- RAY MEASUREMENTS

For the purposes of compari ng resu l ts from vari ous head impact tests at vari ous research l aboratories , a s tandard reference frame must be used . Such frame adopted for the head i s based on the Frankfort p l ane of the s ku l l defi ned by the two i nfraorb i ta l notches and the two upper edges of the audi tory meati . Si nce the i ns trumentation frame does not co i nc i de wi th the s tandard anatomi cal frame , i t is necessary to transform the accel eration readi ngs from the ( e1 , e2 , , e3 ) frame to the ( i , j , k ) frame . Thi s requi res the knowl edge of the orthogonal transformation matri x between them . To th i s end , a 3-d imens i onal x-ray tech­n i que was devel oped to comoute s pace in the ( x ,y , z ) coord i nates of the 4 ana­tom i ca l l andmarks whi ch defi ne the anatomi cal frame , and those of the 3 centers of tri axi a l acce l e rometers , whi ch defi ne the i ns trumentation frame . These poi nts a re i denti fied on the radi ographs by smal l l ead pel l ets wh i ch are p l aced at the seven l ocati ons . The x-ray procedure i s to take two orthogonal radi ographs of the i nstrumented head , p l aced i n a pre-ca l i brated x-ray fi el d . Each x- ray fi l m i s analyzed to obta i n ( x ,y ) or ( x , z ) fi l m coordi nate pa i rs for the seven poi nts , whi ch are then combi ned to produce the true l aboratory ( x ,y , z ) coordi nates of these seven poi nts . Once th i s i s done , the transforma­t i on matri x between the i nstrumentation and anatomi cal frames i s obta i ned . The accuracy of th i s method was found to be sati sfactory wi th errors i n x , y or z not exceedi ng 2 mm , whi ch corresnonds to axi s mi sal i gnment of about l degree .

Page 5: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

Fi gure 3 . I nsta l l ation of tri axi a l ac9e] erometer mounts(on

) cadaver

head (A ) s i te preparation , t B ) secur i ng wi re C fi nal confi guration of 3 mounts . The fourth central c i te i s for cable t ie down .

HEAD MOTION KI NEMAT I CS

The three tri axi al accel erometers provi de t ime h i s tories of the 3 accel era­t ion vectors at three l ocations Q1 , Q2 and Q3 • These vectors !_1 , i:.z , and .i_3 are then expressed i n the anatomi cal frame ( i ,j , k ) u s i ng the orthogonal matri x determi ned from radi ographs . Assumi ng that the 3 accel erometers are mounted an a r i g i d body , i t i s poss i b l e to wri te :

r = r + � X D .� + w X w X o _ ; ( n = 1 , 2 , 3 ) -n -0 - "'-fl - - "'-fl ( 1 ) where r i s the accel eration vector of a body reference point Q0 ,

w� w a re angu l ar accel erati on and vel oci ty vectors of the head , and E.n Ts the pos i ti on vector of On ( nth accel erometer center ) re l at i ve to

the reference poi nt Q0 , known from radi ographs . I n equation ( 1 ) above , the io , � and w are unknown , whi l e .in and 2.o ( n = 1 , 2 , 3 ) are known. However , s i nce w i s the time deri vati ve of w the pr1 mary unknowns are fo and �· Thus , when thi s-equation i s expanded , i t resu l ts i n n i ne sca l ar di fferenti a l equati ons i n s i x unknown s . The overdetermined system of equati ons may be reduced and parti a l l y uncoupl ed by tak i ng advantage of the redundancy to mi n i mi ze experimental errors .

Page 6: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

For each tri axi a l accel erometer , equati on ( 1 ) i s wri tten as :

(r0} -

[p n ] {� } + [w] { [w ] { p n } } - { rn} = O ; ( n = 1 , 2 ,3 ) ( 2 )

where { } i ndi cates a col umn ( 3 x 1 ) matri x of the anatomi cal components o f a gi ven vector , and [ ] i s a s kew-symmetri c ( 3 x 3 ) square matri x ,

e . g . : and [w ] = [ �3 �w3 _:�]

-w2 w 1 0 i n wh i ch the s ubscri pts 1 , 2 , 3 i nd i cate the anatomi cal i , j and k di recti ons , respecti vely . The 3 matri x equations descri bed i n equation ( 2 ) may be further compressed i nto a s i ng l e matri x equation

{Ao} - [R] {�} + { V} = 0 ( 3 )

[ (p

i

) l [w] { [w ] {p 1 } }

-

{

�� } l where : [R] = [p 2 ] ; and { V} = [w] { [w ] {p2 } } { r2 } [p 3 J [w ] { [w ] {p 3 } } - a ·; }

Because o f the errors i nevi tably present i n the 9 accel erat ion readi ngs , i . e . , i n the components of { r1 } , { r2 } and { r3 } , the l eft-hand s i de of equa­tion ( 3 ) i s never exactly zero , but rather a smal l ( 9 x 1 ) error vector { d :

( 4 )

Th i s error may be mi ni mi zed by search i ng for a s o l u ti on wh i ch nul l i fi es the parti a l deri vati ves of the squared error wi th respect to the unknowns . For the angul ar accel erati on vector , th i s cri terion reduces to :

T a { d { d = 0 a {� }

By sel ecti ng the reference ooi nt Q0 as the centro i d of the 3 tri axi a l acce l e rometer centers Q1 , ·02 and Q3 , two thi ngs occur : one is the immedi ate sol uti on for f rei } , the other i s the s i mp l i fi cation of equati on ( 5 ) .

Thus ,

and ,

{ r0 } = 1 /3 { {r1 l + {r2 l + { r 3 l } {�} = [[R]T [RJ]- l [R]T { V}

( 6 )

( 7 )

Equati on ( 7 ) i s a system of 3 s imul taneous di fferenti a l equati ons wh i ch �an be sol ved by numeri cal techniques , wh ich res ul ts i n 3 components of {w} and {w} . Such techni ques , publ i shed el s ewhere [6] , wi l l not be di scussed i n thi s paper .

I - { I /

Page 7: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

VAL I DATION OF THE METHOD

In order to val i date the HSRI 9-accel erometer method , a compl etely known 3-D motion was mathemati ca l ly imposed on a hypotheti cal ri gi d body , to wh i ch three hypotheti ca l tri axia l accel erometers were attached . The n i ne accel era­tion readi ngs were cal cu l ated , then used i n the HSRI 3-0 moti on ana lys i s pack­age to produce a compl ete descri pt ion of the moti on . The cal cu l ated motion was then compared to the exactly known moti o n , by ca lcu l ati ng the devi ation between the exact and cal cul ated outputs . Typi cal resul ts are d i s cussed on the next page .

Exper imental val i dation of the method i s more di ffi cul t s i nce i t i s ex­tremely di ffi cu l t to experimental ly produce a prec i se ly known 3 -D motion . How­ever , one non- impact test was conducted to measure the 3 -D mot i on of an em­balmed cadaver head . I n addi tion to the 9-accelerometer i nstrumentati on , a tri ax i a l accel erometer was mounted at the base öf the s ku l l and i ts l ocation was detenni ned wi th the x-ray techni que descri bed earl ier . Us i ng the 3-D analys i s package , the tran s l ati onal accel erati ons of the center of mass of the tri axi a l acce l erometers were computed and compared to the actua l readi ngs at that poi nt . Fi gure 4 s hows the actual and cal cul ated read i ngs of thi s poi nt, and s hows an excepti onal ly good agreement .

-1 cn

-a:: cn 1 „ _J C)

a.. 1

a:

- - actual

0 80 TIME

1 20 ( MSEC l

TEST 768001

.... - · .

1 160

0 • 0 ="

0 . 0 O>

0 . 0 CD

' 200

Figure 4 . Co�pari son between actual ( d i rectly measured ) and ca l cu l ated (w1 th 9-acc . package ) trans l ational accel erati on of the base of s kul l for non- i mpact test No . 76B001 .

. �- J /) (>

Page 8: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

' (rl

cn

w

-

i

!:: ß

--u

-

cn

9 !i �

1 w

. >

i -

� - :z

cn

1 z

0

- �

cc

g

cn

a:

w

..J

g � !?!

w

u

i

� u

cc

(!)

z

cc

- !i

0 e

18 a

32

IMI

0

8 R

a

32

1M1

i� l� -

-1� �i �i 0

i „

i cn �- - z

1 ii - !i

-[! -[ ! [!

--4 i� �+ =+

US 2"

32

u

0

8 �

2"

32

u

Tl

t'E

( HSEt )

TUE

C "5EC

) EX

ACT

3-0

MOTI

ON

DEVI

ATIO

N =

CA

LCUL

ATEO

-EX

ACT

Figu

re 5

. Ex

act

3-D

angu

lar

acce

lera

tion

and

vel

ocit

y,

defi

ned

by a

hyp

othe

tica

1 mo

tion

, an

d th

e de

viat

ion

from

the

exa

ct v

alue

s, o

f th

ose

calc

ulat

ed

with

the

HSR

I 3-

D mo

tion

ana

1ysi

s pr

ogra

m.

Page 9: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

I n one hypothetical cas e , the exact ( except for truncation errors ) s imu­l ated n i ne accel eration readi ngs were used i n the 3-D analys i s to compute the angu l ar vel oci ty and accel erati o n , whi ch were then compared to thei r known exact val ues . The dev i ations between cal cul a ted and exact moti o n , s hown i n fi gure 5 , are i ns i gn i fi cant . I n real s i tuati ons , however , experimenta l errors are i nevi tab l e i n readi ng the 9 di fferent accel erations�

An i n-depth s tudy of the accuracy of thi s and other methods i s underway at HSRI , and i ts resu l ts wi l l be publ i s hed when comp l eted . Th i s accuracy depends l argely on the experimental errors commi tted i n measuri ng the 9-accel erati ons . The major sources of errors are : a ) mi s l ocation and m i sa l i gnment of the tri ­axi a l mounts , b ) ca l i bra ti on errors due to the sens i ti v i ty l imi tati ons of the accel erometers , c) noi se i n the transducer s i gnal s , e i ther external to the mo­tion or resu l t ing from cross-axi s sens i ti vi ty of the transducers i tsel f , and fi nal l y , d ) zero-bi as of the s i qnal s resu l t i ng from mi s - adj ustment of the equi p­ment. Most of these errors can be reduced , however , errors such as cross-ax i s sens i t ivi ty , cal i brat ion and mi sal i qnment are i nherent i n most accel erometers , and cannot be avoi ded . The use of redundant accel erometers , and thei r analys i s wi th l east squares techni ques reduce thei r effects and produce acceptabl e three­di mens i ona l moti on measurement .

SOME I MPACT RESULTS

Fi fteen cadaver heads , comol etely i nstrumented wi th 9-accel erometer pack­age , were di rectly i mpacted from front , rear and s i de . The transducer outputs were recorded on analog tape , whi ch was subsequently p l ayed back for d i g i ti zi ng , di g i ta l fi l teri ng and 3- D head moti on analyses . Limi ted s pace a l l ows to s how the parti a l res u l ts of only three tests , gi ven i n fi gures 6 , 7 and 8 . Compl ete test resu l ts are bei nq presented e l s ewhere [9 ] .

CONCLUS IONS

1 . A brai n vascu l ar oressuri zation technique wh i ch a l l ows adequate per­fus i on of the brai n , rel i ab l e moni tori ng of dynami c pressures during impact and l ocati ng of i nj ury s i tes has been developed .

2 . Three-d imensi onal accel erometry techni ques us ing n i ne accel erometers i n three tri axi a l c l usters was found to be appl i cabl e i n di rect head i mpacts .

3 . The acce l erometry method of HSRI has the advantages of s impl e mounti ng on the cadaver head and i ncreased accuracy due to l arge separation of the tri ­ax i a 1 c 1 us ters .

4 . The analys i s method resul ts i n the best ( i n the l east squares sense) sol uti on for the angu l ar moti on , a defi ni te advantage when dea l i ng wi th experi ­mental data .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Th i s work was supported i n part by the General Motors Research Labora­tori es , the Motor Veh i c l e Manufacturers Associ ation and the Nati onal Hi ghway Traffi c Safety Admi n i s trati on . The authors woul d l i ke to a l s o recogni ze the s i gni fi cant contri buti ons of J . B . Benson and G . S . Nushol tz to the devel op­ment of the experi mental techni ques .

I //·.() • _,I •

Page 10: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

0

li I-1

(/)

LLI - t: 3

u_

0

!i �

�i

(.!)

z

% I a:

1 IJ

(/)

z

0 - i3

l&J

-

i ..

.J �

LLI

81

a:

C>

i l z

a:

0 -- �

....._

20

llO

60

80

100

""' i� -:3'

(\J

l/)

II

-+ u - %:

l/) - CO

a! ��

-

J� II - (/')

C>

� �

a:

41 l&J .... z

l&J

u

...J

a:

ii u - X:

0 .... a:

z

a: 1�tv

-

ii �-

Ji .. LL..

0

u

u

a:

- a:

20

60

80

100

TitE

( ttSEC

) Fi

gure

6.

Part

ial

resu

lts

from

3-D

mot

ion

anal

ysis

of

test

MVM

113

dire

ct h

ead

impa

ct.

Unit

s ar

e ra

dian

s/s2

, ra

d/s

and

G-un

its,

res

pect

ivel

y fo

r an

gula

r ac

cele

rati

on,

angu

lar

velo

city

and

lin

ear

acce

lera

tion

of

hea

d an

atom

ical

cen

ter.

��

Page 11: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

-.........

"""

0 20

IM>

80

80

100

-

------i �

f:l 'i I

- �

J� - u

9 �

LU

>

(.!) iE :;; h

/\�/'-.

i� ��

�i �

�i a:

a:

� i

u

u

a:

C\J

8 ('f')

rw

(0

n u ;:

a! ;: 8

� >-

� -

CD II - (/)

� <.:>

a:

w

z

w

� u

a:

u

_J

� 5

� �

� er

� 1

� !ih

n_

ia ..

LL

-

0

a:

u

u

a:

Figu

re 7

. Pa

rtia

l re

sult

s fr

om 3

-D m

otio

n an

alys

is o

f di

rect

hea

d im

pact

tes

t,

No.

76Al

35.

Unit

s ar

e ra

d/s2

, ra

d/s

and

G -un

its,

res

pect

ivel

y fo

r an

g ula

r ac

cele

rati

on,

velo

city

and

lin

ear

acce

lera

tion

.

1� i� �i li 1� �i

Page 12: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

--... [�

(J)

w

- 1--

- u

i

g �

w

>

C)

z

a:

(J)

z:

0

- 1--

a:

a:

w

_J

w

u

u

a:

C)

z:

a:

; � ...... �

. Fi g

ure

8.

-1�

-......

-

� J� g [� �

1i Ji ii

CD

0

- - II u

- :::c

::::t

0

::::t

- II - (f)

C)

a:

w

1--

z:

w

u

_J

a:

u

- �

0

1--

a:

z:

a:

..

LL.

0

u

u

a:

0 20

60

80

100

ri ��

-

8 X �

5 ��

ti �

o 20

60

eo

· 100

T lt'IE

( HSEC

)

Part

ial

resu

lts

from

3-

0 m

otio

n an

alys

is o

f di

rect

hea

d im

pact

te

st N

o. 7

6Al6

7.

Unit

s ar

e ra

d/s2

, ra

d/s

and

G-un

its,

res

pect

ivel

y fo

r an

gula

r ac

cele

rati

on,

velo

city

and

lin

ear

acce

lera

tion

.

Page 13: MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACT RESPONSE INTRODUCTION · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 U.S.A. ... impact tests, and all five oroduced satisfactory pressure readings. The transducer output

REFERENCES

l . T . A . Gennarel l i , L . E . Th i bau l t and A. K . Ommaya , 1 1 Pathophys io logi c Re­s ponses to Rotational and Trans l ati onal Accel erati ons . 1 1 Paper 7 20970 , S i xteenth Stapp Car Crash Conf . , SAE 1 972 .

2 . A . Fayon et al . , 11Thorax of 3-Poi nt Bel t Wearers Duri ng a Crash . " Proc . N i neteenth Stapp Car Crash Conf . , paper 751 1 48 , SAE 1 97 5 .

3 . H . J . Mertz and L . M . Patri ck , " I nvesti gation of the Ki nemati cs and Ki ne­t i cs of Whi p l as h . 1 1 Proc . El eventh Stapp Car Crash Conf . , SAE 1 967 .

4 . R . L . Stal naker , V . L . Roberts and J . H . McE l haney , " Door Crashworthi ness Cri teri a . 1 1 Report DOT HS-800-924 , National Techni cal I nformation Servi ce , 1 973 .

5 . E . Becker and G . Wi l l ems , 11An Experimental ly Val i dated 3-0 I nert ia l Trac k­i ng Package for Appl i cati on i n Bi odynami c Research . " Paper 751 1 73 , Proc . N i neteenth Stapp Car Crash Conf . , SAE 1 97 5 .

6 . R . L . Stal naker , N . M . Al em , J . B . Benson and J . W . Mel v i n , 1 1 Va l i dati on Stud i es for Head Impact Injury Model . " Fi nal Report on Contract DOT-HS-031 -3-749 , H i ghway Safety Research I nsti tute , 1 97 5 .

7 . A . J . Padgaonkar , K . W . Kri eger and A . I . Ki ng , "Measurement o f Angu l ar Acce l erati on of Ri g id Body Us i ng Li near Acce l e rometers . 1 1 ASME paper No . 75- APBM- 3 , 1 97 5 .

8 . N . M . Al em , J . B . Benson and J . W . Mel vi n , 11Who l e Body Response Research Program . 11 Fi nal Report No . UM- HSRI-76- 3 , Hi ghway Safety Research i nsti tute , 1 97 6 .

9 . R . L . Sta 1 naker e t a 1 . , " H e a d Impact Response . 1 1 To be presented a t the Twenty-fi rst Stapp Car Crash Conference i n New Orl eans , Lou i s i ana i n October 1 977 .

1 0 . J . A . Bartz and F . E . Butl er , 1 1Passenger Compartment wi th S i x Degrees of Freedom. 11 Auxi l i ary Program to "Three- Dimensi onal Computer S imu l ati on of a Motor Veh i c l e Crash Vi ctim . 1 1 Fi nal Techn� cal Report on DOT Contract No . FH- 1 1 -759 2 , 1 972 .

I 1 b 4