Top Banner
Evaluating Online Learning Programs
43

MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Nov 11, 2014

Download

Education

Barry Dahl

Slides used in conjunction with webinar for online program review at community colleges.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Evaluating Online Learning Programs

Page 2: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Upcoming MCCVLC Webinars

• Apr. 12 – Effective Practices for • New Online Student Orientation• Student Support Services• Professional Development

• Apr. 19 – Accessibility for Online Learning

Page 3: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Comparing Program Reviews to Accreditation

How does the accreditation process

inform our program reviews?

Page 4: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Definitions• Distance Programs (as per HLC)• Distance-delivered programs are those

certificate or degree programs in which 50% or more of the required courses may be taken as distance-delivered courses.

• Source: HLC Substantive Change Application

Page 5: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Definitions• Distance-delivered courses are those in

which all or the vast majority (typically 75% or more) of the instruction and interaction occurs via electronic communication, correspondence, or equivalent mechanisms, with the faculty and students physically separated from each other.

• Source: HLC Substantive Change Application

Page 6: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Definitions• Correspondence Education:• 1) Education provided through one or more

courses by an institution under which the institution provides instructional materials, by mail or electronic transmission, including examinations on the materials, to students who are separated from the instructor.

• Source: HLC Substantive Change Application

Page 7: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Definitions• Correspondence Education: (cont.)• (2) Interaction between the instructor and the

student is limited, is not regular and substantive, and is primarily initiated by the student.

• (3) Correspondence courses are typically self-paced.

• (4) Correspondence education is not distance education.

• Source: HLC Substantive Change Application

Page 8: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Percentage Bracket

Percentage of Distance-Delivered Offerings(calculations are based on degree programs, not certificates)

3 Up to 100% of total degree programs

2 Up to 20% of total degree programs

1 Initiation of distance-delivered offerings up to 5% of total degree programs

0

No degree programs or more than four certificate programs (Commission policy does permit the institution to offer up to four certificate programs as well as a limited number of courses leading to degree programs through distance education or correspondence education without seeking prior approval.)

Seeking Approval from HLC

Page 9: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Initiation with the HLCInitiation occurs and a review is required when the institution:

– plans to initiate its first distance education degree program

– has initiated four distance education certificates and plans to initiate a fifth

• NOTE: Add’l language about correspondence omitted

Page 10: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Expansion of Distance EducationExpansion occurs and a review is required when the institution:

– plans to increase its current activity in distance education degree programs (or correspondence) to a higher Percentage Bracket.

Page 11: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

An HLC Review• Comprehensive reviews examine

– curriculum, – staffing, – support services, – access to appropriate laboratory and

library resources, – and all other facets of quality higher

education.

Page 12: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Interregional Guidelines for the Evaluation of Distance Education

(Online Learning)

http://xlents.com/2012/02for links and info

Page 13: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

C-RAC (Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions)

The new guidelines have been endorsed by all regional accrediting

organizations in the U.S.

Page 14: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

9 Hallmarks of Quality1. Appropriate to mission and purposes2. Part of regular planning and evaluation3. Incorporated into governance/oversight4. Curricula are coherent, cohesive, &

comparable in academic rigor (to trad)5. Evaluates effectiveness of online

offerings, incl. outcomes achievement

Page 15: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

9 Hallmarks of Quality

6. Online faculty are appropriately qualified & effectively supported

7. Effective student and academic services for online students

8. Sufficient resources to support and expand online offerings

9. Assures integrity of online offerings

Page 16: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

On-CampusProgram Review

What is the purpose?

Page 17: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

On-CampusProgram Review

What is your established practice?

Page 18: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Example: Glendale CC

Page 19: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Glendale – Trend Analysis

Page 20: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Glendale – Student Learning Outcomes

Page 21: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Glendale – Parts 3, 4, 5• 3.0 Evaluation of Previous Goals• 4.0 Action Plan

– What is the goal? • Is it reflected in the Academic Master Plan?

– What are the SLOs• Core competencies (college-wide)• Program SLOs• Course SLOs

– How will it improve student learning?• 5.0 Resource Requests

Page 22: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Comparing On-Campus to Online Program Reviews

In what ways should review of online programs be different?

Page 23: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

A Starting Point• Gather proof that your courses are distance

education courses and not correspondence courses. Gather evidence of:– Regular and substantive interaction between the

instructor and the student – and not primarily initiated by the student.

– Timeline expectations for online students to indicate that they are not self-paced. (Maybe!)

Page 24: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Comparing Online Program Data• Possible benchmarks:

– Similar on-campus programs– Similar online programs– Trend analysis over time– Internally set goals or targets– State or National data (to the extent

possible)

Page 25: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Possibilities to Consider• Course Design Quality• Online Teaching Evaluations (by admin)• Online Course Evaluations (by students)• Assessments of Learning Outcomes

– College-wide outcomes– Program outcomes

Page 26: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

3 Major Components of e-Quality

Learning LevelIs High

Teaching LevelIs High

Course DesignMeets Standards

Learning Assessment

Performance Eval Qua

lityM

atter

Page 27: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Designing for Interaction

Specific Review Standards PointsV.1 The course design provides learning activities to foster instructor-student, content-student, and if appropriate, student-student interaction. 3

V.2 The student requirements for course interaction are clearly articulated. 3

V.3 Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability (turn-around time for email, grades posted, etc.) 2

V. LEARNER INTERACTIONGeneral Review Standard: The effective design of instructor-learner interaction andmeaningful learner cooperation is essential to learner motivation, intellectual commitment, and personal development. (From LSC Course Design Rubric)

Page 28: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

More Possibilities to Consider• Student e-Services Audit (if program specific)

• Student Satisfaction Surveys• Course Completion Rate Analyses• Course Success Rate Analyses • Term-to-term Persistence Analyses• Graduation Rate Analyses• Transfer & Placement Rate Analyses

Page 29: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Review of e-Services

Page 30: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

CENTSS

More coming on April 12

Page 31: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Student Satisfaction

Page 32: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Option 1 - PSOL

Page 33: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Why PSOL?

Page 34: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

PSOL BasicsThere are 72 questions that comprise the PSOL. Average completion time is 15 minutes.

NOTE: questions are answered on a 7-point Likert scale, where 7 is high.

26 Priorities statements (can add 10)

7 Information sources about school/program

11 Factors to enroll in the program

3 Overall satisfaction questions

14 Demographics questions (can add 1)

Page 35: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

The Importance of Importance

Page 36: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Data Comparisons

36

Page 37: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

A.A. Students are Very Satisfied

Reputation Offerings Library Quality4.6

4.8

5.0

5.2

5.4

5.6

5.8

6.0

6.2

LSC National A.A. Business Other

2006 Data

Page 38: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

5-year Trend Data

38

Page 39: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Completion and Success

Page 40: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Grades Earned

A B C D F FN W0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30% LSC Developmental Courses - 2009-2010

Online On-ground

Page 41: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Passing Grades in These Courses

C or better D or better50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

60.4%

67.5%

62.3%

66.8%

Passing Grades in Developmental Courses

Online On-ground2009-2010

Page 42: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Persistence

Graduation

Placement

Transfer

Page 43: MCCVLC webinar - Online Program Review

Q & A

Evaluating Online Learning Programs