Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE: To understand the information contained in financial statements with a view to know the strength or weaknesses of the firm and to make forecast about the future prospects of the firm and thereby enabling the financial analyst to take different decisions regarding the operations of the firm. RATIO ANALYSIS: Fundamental Analysis has a very broad scope. One aspect looks at the general (qualitative) factors of a company. The other side considers tangible and measurable factors (quantitative). This means crunching and analyzing numbers from the financial statements. If used in conjunction with other methods, quantitative analysis can produce excellent results. Ratio analysis isn't just comparing different numbers from the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. It's comparing the number against previous years, other companies, the industry, or even the economy in general. Ratios look at the relationships between 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE:
To understand the information contained in financial statements with a
view to know the strength or weaknesses of the firm and to make forecast about
the future prospects of the firm and thereby enabling the financial analyst to
take different decisions regarding the operations of the firm.
RATIO ANALYSIS:
Fundamental Analysis has a very broad scope. One aspect looks at the
general (qualitative) factors of a company. The other side considers tangible
and measurable factors (quantitative). This means crunching and analyzing
numbers from the financial statements. If used in conjunction with other
methods, quantitative analysis can produce excellent results.
Ratio analysis isn't just comparing different numbers from the balance
sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. It's comparing the number
against previous years, other companies, the industry, or even the economy in
general. Ratios look at the relationships between individual values and relate
them to how a company has performed in the past, and might perform in the
future.
MEANING OF RATIO:
A ratio is one figure express in terms of another figure. It is a
mathematical yardstick that measures the relationship two figures, which are
related to each other and mutually interdependent. Ratio is express by dividing
one figure by the other related figure. Thus a ratio is an expression relating one
number to another. It is simply the quotient of two numbers. It can be expressed
1
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
as a fraction or as a decimal or as a pure ratio or in absolute figures as “ so
many times”. As accounting ratio is an expression relating two figures or
accounts or two sets of account heads or group contain in the financial
statements.
MEANING OF RATIO ANALYSIS:
Ratio analysis is the method or process by which the relationship of
items or group of items in the financial statement are computed, determined
and presented.
Ratio analysis is an attempt to derive quantitative measure or guides
concerning the financial health and profitability of business enterprises. Ratio
analysis can be used both in trend and static analysis. There are several ratios
at the disposal of an annalist but their group of ratio he would prefer depends
on the purpose and the objective of analysis.
While a detailed explanation of ratio analysis is beyond the scope of this
section, we will focus on a technique, which is easy to use. It can provide you
with a valuable investment analysis tool.
This technique is called cross-sectional analysis. Cross-sectional analysis
compares financial ratios of several companies from the same industry. Ratio
analysis can provide valuable information about a company's financial health. A
financial ratio measures a company's performance in a specific area. For
example, you could use a ratio of a company's debt to its equity to measure a
company's leverage. By comparing the leverage ratios of two companies, you
can determine which company uses greater debt in the conduct of its business.
A company whose leverage ratio is higher than a competitor's has more debt
per equity. You can use this information to make a judgment as to which
company is a better investment risk.
2
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
However, you must be careful not to place too much importance on one ratio.
You obtain a better indication of the direction in which a company is moving
when several ratios are taken as a group.
OBJECTIVE OF RATIOS
Ratio is work out to analyze the following aspects of business organization-
A) Solvency-
1) Long term
2) Short term
3) Immediate
B) Stability
C) Profitability
D) Operational efficiency
E) Credit standing
F) Structural analysis
G) Effective utilization of resources
H) Leverage or external financing
FORMS OF RATIO:
Since a ratio is a mathematical relationship between to or more variables
/ accounting figures, such relationship can be expressed in different ways as
follows –
A] As a pure ratio:
For example the equity share capital of a company is Rs. 20,00,000 &
the preference share capital is Rs. 5,00,000, the ratio of equity share capital to
preference share capital is 20,00,000: 5,00,000 or simply 4:1.
B] As a rate of times:
3
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
In the above case the equity share capital may also be described as 4
times that of preference share capital. Similarly, the cash sales of a firm are
Rs. 12,00,000 & credit sales are Rs. 30,00,000. so the ratio of credit sales to
cash sales can be described as 2.5 [30,00,000/12,00,000] or simply by saying
that the credit sales are 2.5 times that of cash sales.
C] As a percentage:
In such a case, one item may be expressed as a percentage of some
other item. For example, net sales of the firm are Rs.50,00,000 & the amount of
the gross profit is Rs. 10,00,000, then the gross profit may be described as 20%
of sales [ 10,00,000/50,00,000]
STEPS IN RATIO ANALYSIS
The ratio analysis requires two steps as follows:
1] Calculation of ratio
2] Comparing the ratio with some predetermined standards. The standard ratio
may be the past ratio of the same firm or industry’s average ratio or a projected
ratio or the ratio of the most successful firm in the industry. In interpreting the
ratio of a particular firm, the analyst cannot reach any fruitful conclusion unless
the calculated ratio is compared with some predetermined standard. The
importance of a correct standard is oblivious as the conclusion is going to be
based on the standard itself.
TYPES OF COMPARISONS
The ratio can be compared in three different ways –
1] Cross section analysis:
4
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
One of the way of comparing the ratio or ratios of the firm is to compare
them with the ratio or ratios of some other selected firm in the same industry at
the same point of time. So it involves the comparison of two or more firm’s
financial ratio at the same point of time. The cross section analysis helps the
analyst to find out as to how a particular firm has performed in relation to its
competitors. The firms performance may be compared with the performance of
the leader in the industry in order to uncover the major operational
inefficiencies. The cross section analysis is easy to be undertaken as most of
the data required for this may be available in financial statement of the firm.
2] Time series analysis:
The analysis is called Time series analysis when the performance of a
firm is evaluated over a period of time. By comparing the present performance
of a firm with the performance of the same firm over the last few years, an
assessment can be made about the trend in progress of the firm, about the
direction of progress of the firm. Time series analysis helps to the firm to assess
whether the firm is approaching the long-term goals or not. The Time series
analysis looks for (1) important trends in financial performance (2) shift in trend
over the years (3) significant deviation if any from the other set of data\
3] Combined analysis:
If the cross section & time analysis, both are combined together to study
the behavior & pattern of ratio, then meaningful & comprehensive evaluation of
the performance of the firm can definitely be made. A trend of ratio of a firm
compared with the trend of the ratio of the standard firm can give good results.
For example, the ratio of operating expenses to net sales for firm may be higher
than the industry average however, over the years it has been declining for the
firm, whereas the industry average has not shown any significant changes.
5
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
The combined analysis as depicted in the above diagram, which clearly shows
that the ratio of the firm is above the industry average, but it is decreasing over
the years & is approaching the industry average.
PRE-REQUISITIES TO RATIO ANALYSIS
In order to use the ratio analysis as device to make purposeful
conclusions, there are certain pre-requisites, which must be taken care of. It
may be noted that these prerequisites are not conditions for calculations for
meaningful conclusions. The accounting figures are inactive in them & can be
used for any ratio but meaningful & correct interpretation & conclusion can be
arrived at only if the following points are well considered.
1) The dates of different financial statements from where data is taken must
be same.
2) If possible, only audited financial statements should be considered,
otherwise there must be sufficient evidence that the data is correct.
6
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
3) Accounting policies followed by different firms must be same in case of
cross section analysis otherwise the results of the ratio analysis would be
distorted.
4) One ratio may not throw light on any performance of the firm. Therefore,
a group of ratios must be preferred. This will be conductive to counter
checks.
5) Last but not least, the analyst must find out that the two figures being
used to calculate a ratio must be related to each other, otherwise there is
no purpose of calculating a ratio.
CLASSIFICATION OF RATIO
CLASSIFICATION OF RATIO
BASED ON FINANCIAL BASED ON FUNCTION BASED ON
USER
STATEMENT
1] BALANCE SHEET 1] LIQUIDITY RATIO 1] RATIOS FOR
RATIO 2] LEVERAGE RATIO SHORT TERM
2] REVENUE 3] ACTIVITY RATIO CREDITORS
STATEMENT 4] PROFITABILITY 2] RATIO FOR
RATIO RATIO SHAREHOLDER
3] COMPOSITE 5] COVERAGE 3] RATIOS FOR
RATIO RATIO MANAGEMENT
4] RATIO FOR LONG TERM
7
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
CREDITORS
BASED ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Accounting ratios express the relationship between figures taken from
financial statements. Figures may be taken from Balance Sheet , P& P A/C, or
both. One-way of classification of ratios is based upon the sources from which
are taken.
1] Balance sheet ratio:
If the ratios are based on the figures of balance sheet, they are called
Balance Sheet Ratios. E.g. ratio of current assets to current liabilities or ratio of
debt to equity. While calculating these ratios, there is no need to refer to the
Revenue statement. These ratios study the relationship between the assets &
the liabilities, of the concern. These ratio help to judge the liquidity, solvency &
capital structure of the concern. Balance sheet ratios are Current ratio, Liquid
ratio, and Proprietory ratio, Capital gearing ratio, Debt equity ratio, and Stock
working capital ratio.
2] Revenue ratio:
Ratio based on the figures from the revenue statement is called revenue
statement ratios. These ratio study the relationship between the profitability &
the sales of the concern. Revenue ratios are Gross profit ratio, Operating ratio,
Expense ratio, Net profit ratio, Net operating profit ratio, Stock turnover ratio.
3] Composite ratio:
These ratios indicate the relationship between two items, of which one is
found in the balance sheet & other in revenue statement.
There are two types of composite ratios-
a) Some composite ratios study the relationship between the profits & the
investments of the concern. E.g. return on capital employed, return on
proprietors fund, return on equity capital etc.
8
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
b) Other composite ratios e.g. debtors turnover ratios, creditors turnover
ratios, dividend payout ratios, & debt service ratios
BASED ON FUNCTION:
Accounting ratios can also be classified according to their functions in to
15,93,66NET CURRENT ASSESTS 30,77,14MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE 6,84Total 3818,01
PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2002
(RS.’000)
AS AT 31-3- 2002 AS AT 31-3-2002INCOME:Sales and operating earnings 48,19,19Other income 80,50Variation in stock 1,31,07
50,30,76EXPENCES: Materials consumed 18,97,28Purchase of trading goods 8,61,75 Payments to & provision for 9,95,04 employeesManufacturing expenses 2,21,37Excise duty 65,05Other expenses 5,76,71Interest & finance charges 2,60,22Depreciation 1,05,37Less: transferred to revaluation 1,15 1,04,22
49,81,64PROFIT BEFORE TAX 49,12PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET)PROVISION FOR TAXATIONCurrent tax 24,42Deferred tax liability / (Assets) 4,02PROFIT AFTER TAX 20,68Balance brought forward from previous year 1Balance available for appropriation 20,69
Appropriations:General reserve 20,68Surplus / (loss) carried to B/S 1Proposed dividend
40
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
Tax on proposed dividend20,69
Basic earning per share (rupee)0.41
0.41
BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2003(RS.’000)
AS AT 31-3- 2003 AS AT 31-3- 2003SOURCES OF FUNDSSHAREHOLDERS FUNDShare capital 5,00,00Reserves and surplus 16,55,19
21,62,32NET CURRENT ASSESTS 29,40,10MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE 5,97TOTAL 37,23,11
PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2003
(RS.’000)
AS AT 31-3- 2003 AS AT 31-3- 2003INCOME:Sales and operating earnings 59,62,22Other income 15,04Variation in stock (59,27)
59,17,99EXPENCES: Materials consumed 22,41,60Purchase of trading goods 10,37,52 Payments to & provision for 10,63,96 EmployeesManufacturing expenses 2,69,99Excise duty 72,69Other expenses 7,62,23Interest & finance charges 2,36,57Depreciation 1,07,97Less: transferred to revaluation 1,03 1,06,94
57,91,50PROFIT BEFORE TAX 1,26,49PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET)PROVISION FOR TAXATIONCurrent tax 63,19Deferred tax liability / (Assets) (19,64)PROFIT AFTER TAX 82,94Balance brought forward from previous year 1Balance available for appropriation 82,95
Appropriations:General reserve 26,50Surplus / (loss) carried to B/S 4Proposed dividend 50,00Tax on proposed dividend 6,41
82,95
42
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
Basic earning per share (rupee) 1.66
BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2004(RS.’000)
AS AT 31-3- 2004 AS AT 31-3- 2004SOURCES OF FUNDSSHAREHOLDERS FUNDShare capital 5,00,00Reserves and surplus 17,42,59
21,28,19NET CURRENT ASSESTS 32,69,89TOTAL 40,35,07
43
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2004
(RS.’000)
AS AT 31-3- 2004 AS AT 31-3-2004INCOME:Sales and operating earnings 73,90,47Other income 31,39Variation in stock 53,99
74,75,85EXPENCES: Materials consumed 28,51,40Purchase of trading goods 14,03,33 Payments to & provision for 12,94,47 employeesManufacturing expenses 3,07,51Excise duty 70,08Other expenses 9,17,94Interest & finance charges 2,46,30Depreciation 1,10,89Less: transferred to revaluation 93 1,09,96
72,00,99PROFIT BEFORE TAX 2,74,86PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET) 25,71PROVISION FOR TAXATIONCurrent tax 1,19,50Deferred tax liability / (Assets) 8,13PROFIT AFTER TAX 17294Balance brought forward from previous year 4Balance available for appropriation 1,72,98
Appropriations:General reserve 88,30Surplus / (loss) carried to B/S 7Proposed dividend 75,00Tax on proposed divident 9,61
1,72,98Basic earning per share (rupee) 3.46
44
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31ST MARCH 2005(RS.’000)
AS AT 31-3- 2005 AS AT 31-3- 2005SOURCES OF FUNDSSHAREHOLDERS FUNDShare capital 5,00,00Reserves and surplus 19,14,91
21,36,02NET CURRENT ASSESTS 37,12,19TOTAL 47,66,19
PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE ENDED 31ST MARCH 2005
45
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
(RS.’000)AS AT 31-3- 2005 AS AT 31-3 2005
INCOME:Sales and operating earnings 74,20,31Other income 41,69Variation in stock (38,45)
74,23,55EXPENCES: Materials consumed 25,91,83Purchase of trading goods 15,21,00 Payments to & provision for 13,54,15 employeesManufacturing expenses 2,71,41Excise duty 75,41Other expenses 8,44,78Interest & finance charges 2,15,82Depreciation 1,26,68Less: transferred to revaluation 84 1,25,84
70,00,24PROFIT BEFORE TAX 4,23,31PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTMENT (NET)PROVISION FOR TAXATIONCurrent tax 1,50,84Deferred tax liability / (Assets) (3,31)PROFIT AFTER TAX 2,75,78Balance brought forward from previous year 7Balance available for appropriation 2,75,85
Earning per share is calculated to find out overall profitability of the
company. Earning per share represents the earning of the company whether or
not dividends are declared.
The Earning per share is 5.52 means shareholder gets Rs. 5.52 for each
share of Rs. 10/-. In other words the shareholder earned Rs. 5.52 per share.
57
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
The net profit after tax of the company is increasing in all years.
Therefore the shareholders earning per share is increased continuously from
2001-2002 to 2004-2005 by 0.41 to 05.52. This shows it is continuous capital
appreciation per unit share by 0.41 to 05.52.
The above diagram shows the Earning per share and Dividend per share
is increasing rapidly. It is beneficial to the shareholders and prospective investor
to invest the money in this company.
14] DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO:
Formula: Dividend per share
Dividend Pay out ratio = * 100 Earning per share
YEAR 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 -2005Dividend per share
- 1 1.50 1.80
Earning per share 0.41 1.66 3.46 5.52Dividend payout ratio
- 60.24 43.35 32.60
58
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
COMMENTS:
In the year 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 the Dividend pay out ratio is 60.24
and 43.35 respectively. In the year 2002-2003 the company has declared the
dividend 60.24 and the balance 39.76 is retained with them for the expansion.
The company has not earned more profit in the year 2001-2002 hence the
company has not declared dividend in the year 2001-2002. However the
company has declared more dividends in the year 2002-2003 as the company
has sufficient profit. In the year 2004 the company has declared 1.50 dividends
per share hence the earning per share has doubled. From this one can say that
the company is more conservative for expansion.
15] COST OF GOODS SOLD:
Formula:
COGS
Cost of goods sold Ratio = * 100 Net sales
YEAR 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 -2005COGS 18,90,98 21,96,32 28,33,02 25,72,26Net sales 43,45,46 51,02,37 68,76,89 68,09,78Cost of goods sold ratio
43.51 43.04 41.19 37.77
COMMENTS:
This ratio shows the rate of consumption of raw material in the process
of production. In the year 2001-2002 the cost of goods sold ratio is 43.51% so
the gross profit is 56.49%. it indicates that in 2001-2002, the 43% of raw
material is consumed in the process of production.
During the last 4 years the rate of cost of goods sold ratio is continuously
decreasing however the gross profit & sales is increased during the same
period.
59
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
16] CASH RATIO:
Formula:
Cash + Bank + Marketable securities
Cash ratio = Total current liabilities
YEAR 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 -2005Cash + Bank + Marketable securities
3,31,32 3,95,25 4,49,74 6,04,64
Total current liabilities
15,93,66 21,62,32 21,28,19 21,36,02
Cash ratio 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.28
COMMENTS:
This ratio is called as super quick ratio or absolute liquidity ratio. In the
year 2001-2002 the cash ratio is 0.20 & then it is decreased to 0.18 in the year
2002-2003. Then again it is increased to 0.21 in the year 2003-2004 & 0.28 in
the year 2004-2005.
This shows that the company has sufficient cash, bank balance, & marketable
securities to meet any contingency.
17] RETURN ON PROPRIETORS FUND:
Formula:
NPATReturn on proprietors fund = * 100
Proprietors fund
YEAR 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 -2005NPAT 20,68 82,94 1,72,94 2,75,78Proprietors fund 21,29,69 21,55,19 22,42,59 24,14,91Return on proprietors fund
0.97 3.84 7.71 11.41
60
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
COMMENTS:
Return on proprietors fund shows the relationship between profits &
investments by proprietors in the company. In the year 2002-2003 the return on
proprietors fund is 3.84% it means the net return of Rs. 3 approximately is
earned on the each Rs. 100 of funds contributed by the owners.
During the last 4 years the rate of return on proprietors fund is in
increasing order. The return on proprietors fund during the year 2001-2002 to
2004-2005 is increased from 0.97% to 11.41%.
It shows that the company has a very large returns available to take care
of high dividends, large transfers to reserve etc. & has a great scope to attract
large amount of fresh fund from owners.
18] RETURN ON EQUITY:
Formula:
NPATReturn on equity share capital = * 100
No. of equity share
YEAR 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 -2005NPAT 20,68 82,94 1,72,94 2,75,78No. of equity share
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Return on equity share capital
4.13 16.5 34.58 55
COMMENTS:
This ratio shows the relationship between profit & equity shareholders
fund in the company. It is used by the present / prospective investor for deciding
whether to purchase, keep or sell the equity shares.
In the year 2002-2003 the return on proprietors fund is 16.5%, which
means the net return of Rs. 16, is earned on the each Rs.100 of the funds
contributed by the equity shareholders.
The rate of return on equity share capital is increased from4.13% to 55%
during the year 2001-2002 to 2004-2005. This shows that the company has a
very large returns available to take care of high equity dividend, large transfers
61
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
to reserve, & also company has a great scope to attract large amount to fresh
funds by issue of equity share & also company has a very good price for equity
shares in the BSE.
19] OPERATING PROFIT RATIO:
Formula:Operating profit
Operating profit ratio = *100Net sales
COMMENTS:
Operating profit ratio shows the relationship between operating profit &
the sales. The operating profit is equal to gross profit minus all operating
expenses or sales less cost of goods sold and operating expenses.
The operating profit ratio of 7.11% indicates that average operating
margin of Rs.7 is earned on sale of Rs. 100. this amount of Rs. 7 is available for
meeting non operating expenses. In the other words operating profit ratio 7.11%
means that 7.11% of net sales remains as operating profit after meeting all
operating expenses.
During the last 4 years the operating profit ratio is increased from 7.11%
to 9.38%. It indicates that the company has great efficiency in managing all its
operations of production, purchase, inventory, selling and distribution and also
has control over the direct and indirect costs. Thus, company has a large
margin is available to meet non-operating expenses and earn net profit.
20] CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO:
Formula:
Net credit purchase Credit turnover ratio =
Average creditors
62
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
Months in a year
Average age of accounts payable = Credit turnover ratio
YEAR 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 -2005Net credit purchase
21,21,43 22,71,80 29,08,61 25,29,04
Average creditors 5,88,42 7,91,21 6,96,86 7,80,39Credit turnover ratio
3.6 times 3.6 times 4 times 3 times
Average age of accounts payable
3.3 months 3.3 months 3 months 4 months
COMMENTS:
The creditors turnover ratio shows the relationship between the credit purchase
and average trade creditors. It shows the speed with which the payments are
made to the suppliers for the purchase made from them.
The credit turnover ratio of 4, indicate that the creditors are being turned
over 4times during the year. It indicates the number of rounds taken by the
credit cycle of payables during the year.
There is no standard ratio in absolute term. The creditors ratio for the
year 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 as good as the same, but it is increased by 3.6
to 4 in 2003-2004.this means the company has settled the creditors dues very
fastly than the previous year.
DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO:
Formula:
Credit sales
Debtors turnover ratio =
Average debtors
Days in a year
Debt collection period =
Debtor’s turnover
63
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
YEAR 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004 -2005Credit sales 47,77,48 55,21,33 74,87,36 68,09,78Average debtors 18,49,35 19,05,76 19,51,56 23,06,67Debtors turnover ratio
2.5 times 2.8 times 3.8 times 2.9 times
Debt collection period
146 days 130 days 96 days 125 days
COMMENTS:
Debtor’s turnover ratio is alternative known as “ Accounts Receivable
Turnover Ratio”. This ratio measures the collectibility of debtors & other
accounts receivable, it means the rate at which the trade debts are being
collected.
The Debtors turnover ratio of 2.5 indicates that the debtors are being
turned over 2.5 times during the year. It means that the credit cycle of debtors
makes 2.5 rounds during the year. It helps to workout the debt collection period
i.e. 146 days [365/ 2.5 = 146]. This indicates that it take146 days on an average
for the debtors to be settled. Debt collection period indicates the duration of the
credit cycle of the debtors.
The Debtors turnover ratio is almost same during the year 2001-2002 to
2004-2005, which indicates that the debts are being collected at a fast speed
during the year. The operating cycle of the debtors is short. In other words the
debts collection period is short which result into less chance of bad debts.
64
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL POSITION OF APLAB LIMITED
After going through the various ratios, I would like to state that:
The short-term solvency of the company is quite satisfactory.
Immediate solvency position of the company is also quite satisfactory.
The company can meet its urgent obligations immediately.
Credit policies are effective.
Over all profitability position of the company is quite satisfactory.
Stock turnover rate is satisfactory. Stock of the company is moving fast
in the market.
The company is paying promptly to the suppliers.
The return on capital employed is satisfactory.
The management should take care of inventory management and speed up the
movement of stock. Effective selling technique or product modification may be
adopted to face the competitors and to improve the financial position of the
company by taking appropriate decisions.
65
Downloaded from a2zmba.blogspot.com
CONCLUSION:
The focus of financial analysis is on key figures contained in the financial
statements and the significant relationship that exits. The reliability and
significance attach to the ratios will largely on hinge upon the quality of data on
which they are best. They are as good for as bad as the data it self.
Financial ratios are a useful by product of financial statement and
provide standardized measures of firms financial position, profitability and
riskiness. It is an important and powerful tool in the hands of financial analyst.
By calculating one or other ratio or group of ratios he can analyze the
performance of a firm from the different point of view.
The ratio analysis can help in understanding the liquidity and short-term
solvency of the firm, particularly for the trade creditors and banks. Long-term
solvency position as measured by different debt ratios can help a debt investor
or financial institutions to evaluate the degree of financial risk. The operational
efficiency of the firm in utilizing its assets to generate profits can be assessed
on the basis of different turnover ratios. The profitability of the firm can be
analyzed with the help of profitability ratios.
However the ratio analyses suffers from different limitations also. The
ratios need not be taken for granted and accepted at face values. These ratios
are numerous and there are wide spread variations in the same measure.
Ratios generally do the work of diagnosing a problem only and failed to provide