Top Banner
May 9, 2005 1 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen
20

May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Kaylah Kitchens
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 1

12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain

Prioritization of Forestry Themesfor the SRA

Risto Päivinen

Page 2: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 2

Priorization criteria

1. European objectives,

2. business value,

3. feasibility,

4-8. impact dimensions (consumers, society, environment, energy use, competitiveness)

9. meeting the objectives of the Vision document

10. progress beyond the state-of-art.

Page 3: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 3

Questionnaire to app. 50 persons (see appendix 1)

Question 1: European Union objectives of growth, competitiveness and sustainabilityAre the research objectives of relevance to the EU goals of growth, competitiveness and sustainability?  0 - no comments1 – hardly relevant 2 – somewhat relevant 3 - very relevant 4 – extremely relevant

additional comments: ..

Page 4: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 4

Evaluator profiles (26 persons)

Evaluator profiles (26 persons)

17

2

4

5

1

2

Research

Forest owner

Industry

Education

Other (forest manager (1))

Nature conservation

Note: There are 5 extra entries included in the chart: 4 in education and 1 in nature conservation. 5 evaluators chose tw o profiles: research and education or nature conservation.

Page 5: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 5

Overall averages

15 Themes, average of all questions

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

Page 6: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 6

Averages by groups: industry, forest owners, nat. cons, others

15 Themes, four different averages

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Researchers and others (18) Industry average (4) Forest owner average (2) Nature conservation average (2)

Page 7: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 7

Top themes by groups

15 Themes, Top 5 averages

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Total average (26) Industry average (4) Forest owner average (2) Nature conservation average (2)

Page 8: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 8

European objectives

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

1. European Union objectives of growth, competitiveness and sustainabilityAre the research objectives of relevance to the EU goals of grow th, competitiveness and sustainability?

Page 9: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 9

Industry relevance

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

2. Industrial relevance (business value)Is the industry interested in and capable of benefiting from research activities related to this theme, assuming that the research activities are successful?

Page 10: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 10

Feasibility

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

3. FeasibilityAre the research challenges raised by the theme such that they can be resolved through related research activities?

Page 11: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 11

Consumers

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

4. Impact dimensionsa. Consumers: What is the expected response to future consumer needs?

Page 12: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 12

Society

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

4. Impact dimensionsb. Society: What is the expected impact on prioritized social and general economic goals of the EU (employment in rural areas, development of SMEs, etc)?

Page 13: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 13

Environment

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

4. Impact dimensionsc. Environment: What is the expected impact on main environmental drivers (w ater consumption, w astes, emissions/eff luents, climate chain issues etc)?

Page 14: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 14

Energy

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

4. Impact dimensionsd. Energy use (consumption): What is the expected impact on energy production and use (energy from forest biomass, energy eff iciency etc)?

Page 15: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 15

Competitiviness

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

4. Impact dimensionse. Competitiveness: What is the expected impact on the competitiveness of European industry/companies in global competition?

Page 16: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 16

Vision document

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

5. Meeting the objectives of the Vision Document (challenges, opportunities, strategic objectives). Does the suggested reseach theme meet the strategic objectives stated in the Vision Document?

Page 17: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 17

Novelty in research

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Themes

6. Scientific and technical progress beyond state-of-the-artTo w hat extent does the theme provide progress beyond state-of-the art for the forest-based research and industrial activities?

Page 18: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 18

Next steps

FVC input to step 3 to be finalised

Feedfback from Sept 12 meeting

Final priorization

Integration with research agendas from other Value Chains

How much focusing needed?

Page 19: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 19

Thank you!

Page 20: May 9, 20051 12 September 2005, Barcelona, Spain Prioritization of Forestry Themes for the SRA Risto Päivinen.

May 9, 2005 20