An Explanation of the Comprehensive Emergency Management System and the role of Social Science in Developing Performance Measures to Achieve the Homeland Security Mission May 5, 2010 Prepared By: Dan Catlett National Hurricane Program Manager
Feb 22, 2016
An Explanation of the Comprehensive Emergency Management System
and the role of Social Science
in Developing Performance Measures to Achieve the Homeland Security Mission
May 5, 2010Prepared By: Dan Catlett National Hurricane Program Manager
“Reduce the loss of life and property and protect the Nation from all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters, by leading and supporting the Nation in a risk-based, comprehensive emergency management system of preparedness, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation.”
-- Both PKEMRA and The FEMA Strategic Plan (February 2008)
The Statutory FEMA Mission: Increase the Nation’s “Resilience” by Leading and Supporting the
“Comprehensive Emergency Management System”
“FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from and mitigate all hazards”
-- W. Craig Fugate, Administrator (6/17/09)
The New FEMA Mission: Support our Citizens and First Responders to “Build, Sustain and Improve our Capability.”
“(T)he governmental function that coordinates and integrates all activities necessary to build, sustain, and improve the capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, or mitigate against threatened or actual natural disasters, acts of terrorism, or other man-made disasters.”-- The Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-295)
“Emergency Management” PKEMRA Definition:
“The term ‘capability’ means the ability to provide the means to accomplish one or more tasks under specific conditions and to specific performance standards. A capability may be achieved with any combination of properly planned, organized, equipped, trained, and exercised personnel that achieves the intended outcome.” -- The Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-295)
PKEMRA Definition: “Capability”
Capability is the Operational Capacity (“the ability to provide the means to accomplish one or more tasks”) to manage the consequences or Risk from a hazard or threat (“under specific conditions”) to satisfy prevailing Expectations or performance standards (“to specific performance standards.”)
An alternative, Simplified Definition of Emergency Management “Capability”:
The “Capability Formula”
EMC = OC – (R+X)Emergency Management
Capability equals
Operational Capacityminus the sum of
Risk plus Expectations
Definition of Terms:• Operational Capacity = Personnel, Equipment,
Facilities, Systems, Processes, Preparations, and the Readiness to use them.
• Risk = Hazard (or “Threat”) x Vulnerability x Consequences (Note: This Goes A Step Beyond Traditional “Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment” or “HIRA”)
• Expectations (or “Expectations Risk”)= – Internal: Employee and partner attitudes, beliefs and
“conventional wisdom,” etc.); – External: Legislative priorities, academic, media
“spin” and public perceptions, etc.; and– Formal: Measurable Strategic Outcomes and Outputs
Challenge #1:“Capability” cannot be effectively determined without a standardized
determinations of Capacity, Risk or Expectations.”Consequently
“Capacity” often gets measured, then labeled “Capability.”
Challenge # 2:
Unity of Effort is the product of
Unity of Purpose; A Common Operating Picture is the
product of a
Common Planning Picture.
BOTHUnity of Purpose
And a Common Planning Picture.
are dependent on a common, consensus standards for assessing
Capacity, Risk and Expectations-based
Capability
The Solution:Standardized assessments of
Capacity, Risk and Expectations – included the development of a
“planning level event” – to create consistent planning assumptions (NOT planning formats/guidelines such as the TCL, the IPS, etc.) for the Comprehensive Emergency
Management System
PRE-
Even
tThe “Risk-Based, Comprehensive Emergency Management System”
-- Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act (“PKEMRA” -- HR 5441, Sec. 503[b][1])
POST
-Eve
nt
Increase Operational Capacity (OC) Decrease Risk (R)
MITIGATEPREPARE
RECOVER PROTECT
RESPOND
BUILD CAPABILITY“Operational Readiness”
DEPLOY CAPABILITY“Operational Response”
EXERCISE or ACTUAL EVENT
Strategy Development &
Process Planning
(RE)ASSESSMENTS: Operational Capacity, Risk & Expectations
PRE-
Even
tThe “Risk-Based, Comprehensive Emergency Management System”
-- Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act (“PKEMRA” -- HR 5441, Sec. 503[b][1])
POST
-Eve
nt
Increase Operational Capacity (OC) Decrease Risk (R)
MITIGATEPREPARE
RECOVER PROTECT
RESPOND
BUILD CAPABILITY:“Operational Readiness”
Unity of PURPOSECommon PLANNING Picture
DEPLOY CAPABILITY“Operational Response”
Unity of EFFORTCommon OPERATING Picture
EXERCISE or ACTUAL EVENT
Strategy Development &
Process Planning
(RE)ASSESSMENTS: Operational Capacity, Risk & Expectations
PRE-
Even
tPO
ST-E
vent
Increase Operational Capacity (OC) Decrease Risk (R)
Supplement Operational Capacity via Response & Recovery Operations, such as
Mutual Aid, State Declaration, EMAC, and federal declaration (Stafford Act) through full National
Response Framework utilization .
Increase Operational Effectiveness via traditional "Preparedness Cycle” Activities such
as: Analyzing, Assessing, Planning, Training, Staffing, Equipping, etc.
BUILD CAPABILITY“Operational Readiness”
EXERCISE or ACTUAL EVENT
PROTECT
RESPOND
Permanently Reduce Risk from future events via traditional Mitigation measures such as: Land
Use and Building Regulation, Structural Retrofit, permanent risk reduction projects, etc.
MITIGATEPREPARE
RECOVER
Temporarily Reduce Risk in response to a present threat via “Protective Actions” – Population Protection (i.e. evacuation, sheltering, SAR, etc.) as well as temporary risk reduction measures (shutters,
sandbags, levee fortification, etc.)
DEPLOY CAPABILITY“Operational Response”
Strategy Development & Process Planning
(RE)ASSESSMENTS: Capacity, Risk &
Expectations
(RE)ASSESSMENTS: Operational Capacity, Risk & Expectations
SE
SE E
S
- TIME +
- CAPABILITY +S
E
= STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT & PROCESS PLANNING
= EXERCISE OR EVENT
PRE-EVENTREADINESS
POST-EVENTOPERATIONS
“SYSTEMATIC” CAPABILITY-BUILDING OVER TIME
SE
SE E
S
- TIME +
- CAPABILITY +S
E
= STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT & PROCESS PLANNING
= EXERCISE OR EVENT
PRE-EVENTREADINESS
POST-EVENTOPERATIONS
“MULTI-HAZARD/EVENT” CAPABILITY-BUILDING
SE
SE
SSE
SE
SS
ES
ES
SE
SE E
S
- TIME +
- CAPABILITY +S
E
= STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT & PROCESS PLANNING
= EXERCISE OR EVENT
PRE-EVENTREADINESS
POST-EVENTOPERATIONS
“SYSTEMATIC” CAPABILITY-BUILDING OVER TIME
SE
SEKatrina
S
- TIME +
CAPABILITY +S
E = EXERCISE OR EVENT
PRE-EVENT
POST-EVENT
-
= STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT & PROCESS PLANNING
SE
SEKatrina
S
- TIME +
S
E = EXERCISE OR EVENT
PRE-EVENT
POST-EVENT
= STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT & PROCESS PLANNING
CAPABILITY +
PKEMRA
-
PRE-
Even
tThe Resilience Cycle
POST
-Eve
nt
RESPONDTo Emergency
and Crisis Conditions
RECOVERCommunity
Functionality & Self-Sufficiency
Build, Sustain or Improve
READINESS
Build, Sustain or Improve
RESISTANCE
INCIDENT or EVENT
ADAPTTo “New Normal”
Strategy Development &
Process Planning
WITHSTANDThe Impact
Operations
Build Resilience Through Preparedness
Achieve Resilience Through Operations
PRE-
Even
tThe Resilience Cycle
POST
-Eve
nt
RESPONDTo Emergency
and Crisis Conditions
RECOVERCommunity
Functionality and Self-Sufficiency
Build, Sustain or Improve
PREPAREDNESS
Reduce Risk through MITIGATION
INCIDENT or EVENT
ADAPTTo The
“New Normal”
Strategy Development &
Process Planning
PROTECTAgainst The
Impact
Operations
Build Resilience Through Preparedness
Achieve Resilience Through Operations
RESPONDPROTECTRECOVER
DEPLOY CAPABILITY
BUILD CAPABILITY
SE
PREPARE MITIGATE
The “Resilience Formula”
Resilience (Z)equals
Time To New NormalDivided by the
Event
Z = TTNN ÷ E
RESPONSE
RECOVERY
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and “Resilience”