May 2009 Changing Direction Federal transportation funding Christof Spieler http://ctchouston.org
May 2009 Changing Direction Federal transportation funding Christof Spieler .
Dec 14, 2015
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
May 2009
Changing Direction
Federal transportation funding
Christof Spieler
http://ctchouston.org
May 2009 2
May 2009 3
FHWA FTA
May 2009 4
May 2009 5
In the road business since 1893
FHWA
May 2009 6
Federal roadway funding
May 2009 7
Federal roadway funding
Photo: Kir Murray
May 2009 8
Federal roadway funding
May 2009 9
The Grand Parkway
May 2009 10
Step 1: Add project to Regional Plan
1966: add to Major Thoroughfare and Freeway Plan
May 2009 11
Step 2: Environmental clearance
Sept 2008: Record of Decision
Dec 2007: Segment E Final Environmental Impact Statement
1999, 2000, 2003, 2007: public meetings
1993-2007: Environmental process
May 2009 12
Step 2: Environmental clearance
May 2009 13
Step 3: Feds fund the project
Local20%
Federal80%
March 2009: TxDOT allocates $181 million to Grand Parkway
May 2009 14
Missing step: Assess cost effectiveness
The 15 miles of SH 99 from I-10 to US 290 will cost $1 billion to build and maintain over its lifetime, while only generating $162 million in gas taxes. – TxDOT, November 2006
May 2009 15
Missing step: Assess cost effectiveness
“The Grand Parkway… will be an opportunity to open up areas for development in the Greater Houston area” – John Barton, TxDOT
May 2009 16
In the transit business since 1961
FTA
May 2009 17
The Southeast Line
METRO’s Southeast rail line
May 2009 18
Step 1: Alternatives analysis
Feb 2002, May 2002, Jan 2003, Mar 2003: public meetings
Dec 2001- Nov 2003: Alternatives Analysis study
May 2009 19
Bonus step: Referendum
November 2003: Voters approve METRO Solutions
May 2009 20
Step 2: Add project to regional plan
June 2004: public workshops
February 2004: TPC adds Southeast Line to RTP
May 2009 21
Step 3: Meet cost-effectiveness requirements
June 2005: METRO switches to BRT
April 2005: FTA gives medium-low rating
May 2009 22
Step 4: Environmental clearance
February 2007: Record of Decision
January 2007: Final Environmental Impact Statement
July 2006: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, public hearing
Feb/Mar 2006: Public workshops
May 2009 23
Step 5: Try again
Oct 2007: METRO goes back to LRT
May 2009 24
Step 6: Environmental clearance (again)
July 2008: Record of Decision
May 2008: Supplemental EIS, public hearing
October 2007: FTA asks for SEIS
May 2009 25
Step 7: Risk analysis
2008-present: risk assessment
May 2009 26
Step 8: Feds fund the project, maybe?
Local50%
Federal50%
May 2009: FTA indicates that FFGA may be issued FY2010
March 2009: $30 million from stimulus on second try
May 2009 27
15.2 miles 6.2 miles
Which project should be funded?
May 2009 28
Which project should be funded?
$622 million $680 million
May 2009 29
Which project should be funded?
103,246 people+jobs (3 mi.) 163,000 people+jobs (1/2 mi.)
30
“This Administration believes that people should have options to get to work, school, the grocery or the doctor that
do not rely solely on driving. We want to transform our transportation system into a truly multimodal system with strong alternatives to driving in order to maximize highway capacity, combat traffic congestion, reduce our reliance on
oil and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.”
- Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation
May 2009 31
FHWA FTA
Do we need to kick the buckets?
May 2009 32
Questions?
http://ctchouston.org
Related Documents
