Maximal CP Violation Maximal CP Violation Hypothesis and Hypothesis and Phase Convention Phase Convention of the CKM Matrix of the CKM Matrix January 13, 2004, at YITP Y. Koide (University of Shizuoka) Based on hep-ph/0411280 (to appear in Phys.Lett.B)
27
Embed
Maximal CP Violation Hypothesis and Phase Convention of the CKM Matrix January 13, 2004, at YITP Y. Koide (University of Shizuoka) Based on hep-ph/0411280.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Maximal CP Violation Maximal CP Violation Hypothesis and Hypothesis and
Phase ConventionPhase Conventionof the CKM Matrixof the CKM Matrix
January 13, 2004, at YITP
Y. Koide (University of Shizuoka)
Based on hep-ph/0411280
(to appear in Phys.Lett.B)
AbstractAbstract The maximal CP violation hypothesis
depends on the phase convention of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix. Phase conventions which lead to successful prediction under the maximal CP violation hypothesis are only two: the original K-M phase convention and the F-X phase convention. Thereby, possible structures of the quark mass matrices are speculated.
ContentsContents1 Experimental status of the unitary triangle
2 Maximal CP violation hypothesis and the numerical results -- Examples
3 Why does the shape of the unitary triangle depend on the phase convention ?
4 General expressions of the CKM matrix and the related formulae
5 Quark mass matrices speculated from the Fritzsch-Xing phase convention
6 Application to the lepton sector
7 Summary
1 Experimental Status of 1 Experimental Status of the Unitary Trianglethe Unitary Triangle
Unitary condition on the CKM matrix
From decays:
From the best fit of the CKM parameters:
PDG2004
2 Maximal CP violation hypothesis 2 Maximal CP violation hypothesis and the numerical results and the numerical results
-- Examples-- Examples
We define the rotation matrices:
Case of the standard phase Case of the standard phase convention of the CKM matrixconvention of the CKM matrix
where
Rephasing invariant quantity J
Maximal CP Violation Hypothesis
The CP violation phase is chosen so that J is maximal.
The predicted value of is favorable,
but the value of is in disagreement.
Case of the original KM phase convention
Max CPV hypothesis predicts
in good agreement with experiments
3 Why does the shape of the 3 Why does the shape of the unitary triangle depend on the unitary triangle depend on the
phase convention ?phase convention ?
The CKM matrix is rephasing invariant.
Should the shape of the unitary triangle be independent of the phase convention?
Note that in the present maximal
CPV hypothesis we have assumed that only free parameter is a CPV phase and the rotation angles are fixed.
AssumptionsAssumptions
The phase factors in the quark mass matrices Mf (f=u,d) are factorized by the
phase matrices Pf as
where are real matrices and
so that the CKM matrix V is given by
where
(3.4)
• The quark masses mfi are only determined
by .
• In other words, the rotation parameters are given only in terms of the quark mass ratios, and independent of the CPV phase.
• In such a scenario, the maximal CPV hypothesis means that the CPV phase takes its maximum value without changing the quark mass values.
4 General expressions of the CKM 4 General expressions of the CKM matrix and the related formulaematrix and the related formulae
Let us define the CKM matrix V(i,k) as
V(i,k) = RiT Pj Rj Rk . (4.1)
Then, for the 9 cases of V(i,k), the rephasing invariant quantity J is given by
(4.2)
Also see, Fritzsch-Xing, PRD57, 594 (1998).
The angles (l=1,2,3) in the unitary
triangle are also given by
(4.3)
where (l,m,n) is a cyclic permutation of (1,2,3), and .
Note that the magnitudes
are independent of the phase .
Under the approximation
we obtain the following 4 types of J:
(A) (4.4)
for V(1,2), V(1,3), V(2,1) and V(2,3),
(B) (4.5)
for V(1,1) and V(3,3),
(C) (4.6)
for V(3,1) and V(3,2), and
(D) (4.7)
for V(2,2).
Under the maximal CPV hypothesis,
only two cases can give the observed
shape of the CKM matrix and value of J:
V(1,1): the original Kobayashi-Maskawa phase convention [PTP 49, 652 (1973)]
V(3,3): the Fritzsch-Xing phase convention
[PLB413, 396 (1997)]
V(1,1) 90.0o 23.2o 66.8o
V(3,3) 89.0o 23.2o 67.8o
Experiment
5 Quark mass matrices speculated 5 Quark mass matrices speculated from the F-X phase conventionfrom the F-X phase convention
The successful case
V(3,3) = R3T P1 R1 R3 (5.1)
suggests the following quark mass matrix
structure:
Fritzsch-Xing, PLB413, 396 (1997)
Xing, PRD68, 073008 (2003)
The explicit forms of V and M are given by
If we assume Md11 =0, we obtain
the well-known relation
Also if we assume Mu11 =0, we obtain
which is roughly consistent with
If we assume Mu22=0 together with
sd23=0, we obtain
(5.8)
For a further detailed phenomenological study of the V(3,3) model with the renormalization group effects, see Xing, PRD68, 073008 (2003).
6 Application to the lepton sector6 Application to the lepton sector
From the observed fact
(6.1)
We can classify the prediction of J into the following three types:
(A) (6.2)
for V(1,3), V(2,3), V(1,2), V(1,1), and V(3,3),
(B) (6.3)
for V(3,1) and V(2,1), and
(C) (6.4)
for V(3,2) and V(2,2).
From the analogy to the quark sector, we consider that the lepton mixing matrix U is also given by V(3,3).
Then, the maximal CPV hypothesis predicts
(6.5)
The requirement Me11=0 predicts
(6.6)
where we have assume s23=/4.
7 Summary7 Summary(1) Under the maximal CPV hypothesis, only two
expressions V(1,1) and V(3,3) can give the
successful predictions for unitary triangle:
90o, 23o, 67o(2) The F-X expression V(3,3) suggests a quark mass
matrix structure
which leads to
under
under
Open QuestionsOpen Questions
(1) What mechanism can cause such a maximal CP violation?
(2) What mechanism can give the successful quark mass matrix structure,
?
(3) Is there a simple ansatz for the mixing angle 23?
Especially, 23=/4 for the lepton sector.
Phenomenology of the unitary triangle will provide a promising clue to the unified understanding of the quark and lepton mass matrices.