Top Banner
EFFECTS OF SNOW DEPTH AND SNOWSHOE HARE ABUNDANCE ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF COYOTES IN THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORESTS Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder
14

Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Damian McCoy
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

EFFECTS OF SNOW DEPTH AND SNOWSHOE HARE ABUNDANCE ON THE

DISTRIBUTION OF COYOTES IN THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORESTS

Matt GuyersonWinter Ecology

Spring 2014

Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder

Page 2: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Introduction

Research suggests: traveling and hunting in deep snow is

energetically expensive for coyotes (Gese, 2013) Coyotes were most abundant at low elevations

where snow was shallow (Murray, 1991) Snowshoe hares are the main prey of coyotes

and lynx (Murray 1991)Q: How does snow depth and snowshoe hare

abundance affect the distribution of coyotes in the southern rocky mountain forests?

Page 3: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Introduction

H1: The coyotes will be more abundant in lower elevation forests with less snow

H2: The coyotes will be more abundant in areas of high snowshoe hare abundance

Page 4: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Introduction

Gain an understanding of the relationship between coyotes and snowshoe hares in the winter

Gain an understanding of the habitats preferred by coyotes and also by snowshoe hare in the winter

Page 5: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Methods

Selected two sites MRS high elevation deep snow depth forest Caribou Ranch Open Space Lower elevation

medium-low snow depth forest At each site selected a random area of the

forest to be studied area of forest studied was calculated using plotted

locations Walked around selected area of forest

recording snowshoe hare and coyote tracks along with snow depth at each track occurrence

Page 6: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

MRS Site

850 ft

625 ft

675 ft

Area=208,656 ft2

Page 7: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Caribou Ranch Open Space

850 ft

500 ft

400 ft

925 ft

Area= 397,500 ft2

Page 8: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Limitations of Study Design

Data collection is dependent on good weather

Have no replication

Page 9: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Results

Page 10: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Results

Snow depth is affecting coyotes distribution

There is a relationship between Snowshoe Hare abundance and the coyotes distribution

Page 11: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Discussion

Snowshoe Hare tracks were always found next to coyote tracks

Snowshoe Hares did not mind the snow depth

Snow depth seemed to be the driving factor in the coyotes distribution

Page 12: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Discussion

Coyotes use of snowmobile tracks increased in areas of deep snow (Gese 2013)

Other factors could be affecting coyotes distribution

Possible Sources of Error: Not enough data collection/ no replication Hard to tell if tracks were the same or

different animal

Page 13: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Conclusion

Snowshoe Hare abundance is affecting the coyotes distribution

Snow depth is the main driver for the distribution of the coyotes

Page 14: Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

References

Murray DL, Boutin S (1991) The influence of snow on lynx and coyote movements: does morphology affect behavior? Oecologia 88: 463– 469.

Gese, Eric M., Jennifer L. B. Dowd, and Lise M. Aubry. "The Influence of Snowmobile Trails on Coyote Movements during Winter in High- Elevation Landscapes." Ed. Matt Hayward. PLoS ONE 8.12 (2013): E82862. Print.