Top Banner
Math Workbench A tangible user interface to explore Fractal Geometry
42
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Math Workbench process book

1

49

Math WorkbenchA tangible user interface to explore Fractal Geometry

Page 2: Math Workbench process book

2

Page 3: Math Workbench process book

3

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION How I arrived at my concept

THESIS STATEMENT & RESEARCHABLE QUESTION Exploration in the work

TARGET AUDIENCE Why children?

IDEATION Why math?

PROTOTYPE Why physical interaction?

BIBLIOGRAPHY Reference materials and documents

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 4: Math Workbench process book

4

1IntroductionHow I arrived at my concept

Page 5: Math Workbench process book

5

Far too many students in America hate math and for many it is a source of anxiety and fear. One group of parents and educators believe that mathematics should be taught traditionally with the teacher explaining methods and the students watching and then practicing them, in silence and the second group believe that students should be more involved discussing ideas and solving applied problems with their hands and objects.

Many students in America hate math and for many it is a source of anxiety and fear. I think part of the problem with current elementary school math is that children are not getting any cool topics.

That statement has been lingering in my mind for a while now, which has prompted me to think how might I develop a game or tangible device to tackle the toughest learning hurdles? How might I introduce a new topic in the elementary school curriculum?

In my constant pursue to figure out why I don’t enjoy math could be the reason that I need to connect what I learn in school to real life. Everything around us is changing rapidly before our eyes. I strongly believe educators in the elementary school level need to prepare their students for an ever-changing future. We must begin now to demonstrate an appropriate beginning for children to be immersed in the study about fractals, chaos, and dynamical systems.

I am very interested in the challenges children are facing with math, and as a designer I have made it a personal mission to communicate better ways to help children change their way of learning.

Page 6: Math Workbench process book

6

2Thesis StatementThe purpose of my exploration in the work

Page 7: Math Workbench process book

7

Kinesthetic learning occurs when people widen their thinking to interact with the information and experiences with their hands. People learn more profoundly and retain knowledge longer when they have opportunities to connect actively with the information and experiences. I am interested in producing math games/exercises that could be used at home where students are not pressured by the routines of regular class time. By getting children and parents to realize that the thought process used for problem-solving math exercises in the classroom is the same thought process used in solving problems in other areas of their studies, this will encourage the children to become productive thinkers.

How can I teach kids between the ages of 7 to 10 to explore the concept of fractal geometry using a tangible media approach to solve problems?

Page 8: Math Workbench process book

8

3Target Audience

Page 9: Math Workbench process book

9

Children of the 21st century are born into an age where technology is part of their daily experience – from simple mobile phones to playing computer games. Creating, sharing and viewing are naturally within their vocabulary – buttons and gadgets are an endless source of fascination.

Exposure to and, later, training in math will benefit children in various ways. It can e.g. positively effect concentration, patience, self-esteem, school perfor-mance and expression. With this in mind, an exploration of children and music was the starting point. It became apparent that in most cases there is a gap be-tween the average age children become interested in music and when their mo-tor skills, maturity and local offerings allow them to start taking music lessons. In many cases, the lessons on offer are also less focused on the children’s creativity and engagement than skill-acquisition, i.e. learning how to play a certain instru-ment.

Children’s education tools/toys like Leap frog and education software, has fasci-nated me ever since I started playing with them. We want to prepare the next generation of children for the better. To inspire them to like math so in the future they will appreciate it more. I had a constant fear that my project might not work from the start or fall apart in the middle. I began by interviewing a number of parents that I know who are interested in helping their children appreciate math more. Specifically I was seeking a better understanding of the frustration they either have for the current education school system or why the society thinks children shouldn’t be allow to learn advanced math topics at an early age.

“If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up people together and work, but rather teach them to

long for the endless immensity of the sea.” — Saint-Exupéry

Why children?

Page 10: Math Workbench process book

10

4IdeationWhy math?

Page 11: Math Workbench process book

11

These books were my primary sourc-es of information and influences in developing my thesis proposal.

Page 12: Math Workbench process book

12

Now that a mathematical language exists that can be applied to highly irregular and frag-mented special patterns, the daily environment of children, which consists of both fractal patterns and classical geometric shapes, can no longer be overlooked by educators. Discus-sions of objects with non-classical geometric shapes do not need to be avoided by teach-ers. Rather, attention needs to be given to ways in which this new mathematics can be addressed in the K-12 curriculum. I believe this is the appropriate time of studying basic concepts of fractal geometry in the elementary grades.

In the elementary mathematics cirriculum, discussions about shape continue to focus with classical geometric shapes only. This behavior is not unexpected, given the “newness” of fractal geometry. However, it seems that, as with classical geometry, some basic concepts of fractal geometry could be introduced to young children, including shape, iterations, and measurement.

Page 13: Math Workbench process book

13

The best way to teach someone something is to instill in them a love and fascina-tion for the thing so that they are motivated and continue to pursue it on their own.

How this relates to math: school math does not instill a love of math in kids. In fact, it does just the opposite by giving kids boring repetitive tasks that don’t seem to relate to anything in real life.

How do we get kids to love math? Show them something cool!

Fractals is a great candidate for cool math because they relate to real life.

A. Low entry floor:

They are easily understood without confusing equations. in fact, Mandelbrot himself is a proponent of first gaining an intuitive understanding of fractals before delving into proofs and formulas. This means that kids can understand fractals without difficulty especially because...

B. They relate to the real world:

Snowflakes, trees, broccoli, coastlines. Can give kids an exhilarating new lens through which to view the world

C. High ceiling:

You can delve deeply into the field. It’s “real math” as opposed to toy examples given to schoolchildren today. Having an intuitive initial understanding is just the foundation to delve into a whole world of fascinating concepts.

Why math?

Page 14: Math Workbench process book

14

Analyze characteristics and properties of 2D & 3D geo-metric shapes and develop mathematical arguments about geometric relationships

Specify locations and describe spatial relationships using coordinate geometry and other representational systems

Apply transformations and use symmetry to analyze mathematical situations

Use visualization, spatial reasoning, and geometric modeling to solve problems

Geometry Standard for Grades 3-5

IDENTIFY, COMPARE, AND ANALYZE attributes of 2D & 3D shapes and devel-op vocabulary to describe the attributes

CLASSIFY 2D & 3D shapes according to their properties and develop definitions of classes of shapes such as triangles and pyramids

INVESTIGATE, describe, and reason about the results of subdividing, combining, and transforming shapes

EXPLORE congruence and similarity

MAKE AND TEST conjectures about geometric properties and relationships and develop logical arguments to justify conclusions.

MAKE AND USE coordinate systems to specify locations and to describe paths

FIND THE DISTANCE between points along horizontal and vertical lines of a coordinate system

DESCRIBE location and movement using common language and geometric vocabulary

IDENTIFY AND DESCRIBE line and rotational symmetry in 2D & 3D shapes and designs

DESCRIBE A MOTION or a series of motions that will show that two shapes are congruent

PREDICT AND DESCRIBE the results of sliding, flipping, and turning 2D shapes

IDENTIFY AND DRAW a two-dimension-al representation of a three-dimensional object

IDENTIFY AND BUILD a three-dimensional object from two-dimensional representations of that object

CREATE AND DESCRIBe mental images of objects, pat-terns, and paths

BUILD AND DRAW geometric objects

USE GEOMETRIC MODELS to solve problems in other areas of mathematics, such as num-ber and measurement

RECOGNIZE GEOMETRIC IDEAS and relationships and apply them to other disciplines and to problems that arise in the classroom or in everyday life

Analyze characteristics and properties of 2D & 3D geo-metric shapes and develop mathematical arguments about geometric relationships

Specify locations and describe spatial relationships using coordinate geometry and other representational systems

Apply transformations and use symmetry to analyze mathematical situations

Use visualization, spatial reasoning, and geometric modeling to solve problems

Geometry Standard for Grades 3-5

IDENTIFY, COMPARE, AND ANALYZE attributes of 2D & 3D shapes and devel-op vocabulary to describe the attributes

CLASSIFY 2D & 3D shapes according to their properties and develop definitions of classes of shapes such as triangles and pyramids

INVESTIGATE, describe, and reason about the results of subdividing, combining, and transforming shapes

EXPLORE congruence and similarity

MAKE AND TEST conjectures about geometric properties and relationships and develop logical arguments to justify conclusions.

MAKE AND USE coordinate systems to specify locations and to describe paths

FIND THE DISTANCE between points along horizontal and vertical lines of a coordinate system

DESCRIBE location and movement using common language and geometric vocabulary

IDENTIFY AND DESCRIBE line and rotational symmetry in 2D & 3D shapes and designs

DESCRIBE A MOTION or a series of motions that will show that two shapes are congruent

PREDICT AND DESCRIBE the results of sliding, flipping, and turning 2D shapes

IDENTIFY AND DRAW a two-dimension-al representation of a three-dimensional object

IDENTIFY AND BUILD a three-dimensional object from two-dimensional representations of that object

CREATE AND DESCRIBe mental images of objects, pat-terns, and paths

BUILD AND DRAW geometric objects

USE GEOMETRIC MODELS to solve problems in other areas of mathematics, such as num-ber and measurement

RECOGNIZE GEOMETRIC IDEAS and relationships and apply them to other disciplines and to problems that arise in the classroom or in everyday life

Page 15: Math Workbench process book

15

Analyze characteristics and properties of 2D & 3D geo-metric shapes and develop mathematical arguments about geometric relationships

Specify locations and describe spatial relationships using coordinate geometry and other representational systems

Apply transformations and use symmetry to analyze mathematical situations

Use visualization, spatial reasoning, and geometric modeling to solve problems

Geometry Standard for Grades 3-5

IDENTIFY, COMPARE, AND ANALYZE attributes of 2D & 3D shapes and devel-op vocabulary to describe the attributes

CLASSIFY 2D & 3D shapes according to their properties and develop definitions of classes of shapes such as triangles and pyramids

INVESTIGATE, describe, and reason about the results of subdividing, combining, and transforming shapes

EXPLORE congruence and similarity

MAKE AND TEST conjectures about geometric properties and relationships and develop logical arguments to justify conclusions.

MAKE AND USE coordinate systems to specify locations and to describe paths

FIND THE DISTANCE between points along horizontal and vertical lines of a coordinate system

DESCRIBE location and movement using common language and geometric vocabulary

IDENTIFY AND DESCRIBE line and rotational symmetry in 2D & 3D shapes and designs

DESCRIBE A MOTION or a series of motions that will show that two shapes are congruent

PREDICT AND DESCRIBE the results of sliding, flipping, and turning 2D shapes

IDENTIFY AND DRAW a two-dimension-al representation of a three-dimensional object

IDENTIFY AND BUILD a three-dimensional object from two-dimensional representations of that object

CREATE AND DESCRIBe mental images of objects, pat-terns, and paths

BUILD AND DRAW geometric objects

USE GEOMETRIC MODELS to solve problems in other areas of mathematics, such as num-ber and measurement

RECOGNIZE GEOMETRIC IDEAS and relationships and apply them to other disciplines and to problems that arise in the classroom or in everyday life

Analyze characteristics and properties of 2D & 3D geo-metric shapes and develop mathematical arguments about geometric relationships

Specify locations and describe spatial relationships using coordinate geometry and other representational systems

Apply transformations and use symmetry to analyze mathematical situations

Use visualization, spatial reasoning, and geometric modeling to solve problems

Geometry Standard for Grades 3-5

IDENTIFY, COMPARE, AND ANALYZE attributes of 2D & 3D shapes and devel-op vocabulary to describe the attributes

CLASSIFY 2D & 3D shapes according to their properties and develop definitions of classes of shapes such as triangles and pyramids

INVESTIGATE, describe, and reason about the results of subdividing, combining, and transforming shapes

EXPLORE congruence and similarity

MAKE AND TEST conjectures about geometric properties and relationships and develop logical arguments to justify conclusions.

MAKE AND USE coordinate systems to specify locations and to describe paths

FIND THE DISTANCE between points along horizontal and vertical lines of a coordinate system

DESCRIBE location and movement using common language and geometric vocabulary

IDENTIFY AND DESCRIBE line and rotational symmetry in 2D & 3D shapes and designs

DESCRIBE A MOTION or a series of motions that will show that two shapes are congruent

PREDICT AND DESCRIBE the results of sliding, flipping, and turning 2D shapes

IDENTIFY AND DRAW a two-dimension-al representation of a three-dimensional object

IDENTIFY AND BUILD a three-dimensional object from two-dimensional representations of that object

CREATE AND DESCRIBe mental images of objects, pat-terns, and paths

BUILD AND DRAW geometric objects

USE GEOMETRIC MODELS to solve problems in other areas of mathematics, such as num-ber and measurement

RECOGNIZE GEOMETRIC IDEAS and relationships and apply them to other disciplines and to problems that arise in the classroom or in everyday life

Page 16: Math Workbench process book

16

School Math

Brainstorming

Boring

Doesn't relate to real things in life

Thick textbook

Pencil and Paper can become

tedious

Memorization& Drills

I think a lot of people consider math to be boring probably because it can be very tedious and since there is always one right answer, there isn’t really any opportunity to be creative with it, unlike writing or the arts where there isn’t always a right and wrong answer.

Page 17: Math Workbench process book

17

Fractal Geometry

Infinite ways to explore one

problem

Visually beauitful

Fractals can relate to real objects

in life

InterestingPatterns

Math Geometry Fractal Geometry

Fun for children

Page 18: Math Workbench process book

18

What I first started off...

Page 19: Math Workbench process book

19

Page 20: Math Workbench process book

20

I noticed what I was doing was starting to look like a static interface...

and not a tangible interface.

Page 21: Math Workbench process book

21

Page 22: Math Workbench process book

22

I feel like the strength’s of my table were fairly scattered. While I clearly displayed a strong passion for the proj-ect’s purpose, I had failed at designing the table with a clear and accurate portrayal of the audience the table was catered to. Instead, I had jumped quite quickly into the aesthetics of the interface, the technology/hardware I’m going to use, and “woooo look how pretty and cool fractals are!!” of the project without giving a serious thought to the structural backbone that is asked of projects appealing to kids. What did I do??

As such, the past 5 days after our March 20th meeting, I meticulously worked and sketched out several dif-ferent edits to the interactive fractal geometry table and pages after pages of more interaction ideas and “new” lesson plan. In general they are:

1) revision of the story;2) a sense of “leveling up” in order to give rewards for continued interaction with the table (so they don’t get bored with my table after 10 minutes), and;3) the creation of gainful multi-player interaction.

I went back to the questions I wrote for myself and added new ones to help

me continue this project:1) What was the goal of the project?2) What was the advantage of putting the project into an interactive table?3) How does this better serve the edu-cation of fractal geometry?4) How do you make this table con-tinuously appealing, even to returning users?5) Where is the sense of progression? Where is the storytelling?6) How have you differentiated this from a glorified verbal lesson?There is still a majority of the cre-ative design left to do, I am coding in Processing of some of the rudimen-tary display models that would enable me to have a visual aid when pitch-ing the fractal geometry table to my peers. Another reason why pencil and paper alone aren’t enough: Fractals are repetitive and require generating the same thing at smaller and smaller scales with a pretty high degree of ac-curacy. Computers are good at doing repetitive tasks accurately. Children are less so. Pencil, papers, and rulers could get very tedious for kids and re-duce their enjoyment of the concepts. However, I’m questioning my think-ing on why tangibles are absolutely necessary. I can just do a touch screen interface by dragging around virtual shapes, which might actually decrease

Learning from my mistakes

Page 23: Math Workbench process book

23

the technical difficulties so I don’t have to deal with vision (ReacTIVision and tracking id markers on tangibles). Ok. I will prototype a small portion of my lesson using “touch screen” interface. 2 more weeks left. It’s do-able! Once I sort out my sketches on loose leave papers, I will reply under my own post, my new demo on my interactive fractal geometry table. By the way, I am taking out the video part (where I’m showing children where are real fractals found). I feel like showing a video is just giving them a “tour” of what are fractals. I came up with a different promising way to have children explore and use clas-sical geometric polygons to real life fractals.

Thinking a step ahead: some people out there might be thinking that teaching kids “hard math” would further frustrate them, causing them to hate math even more. Arguments against that: this is precisely why I’m building my experiment. Fractals aren’t inherently hard to understand. They just aren’t usually presented to kids, so it’s really the existing media, not the message itself that are un-friendly for kids. I am building a way for kids to see how cool fractals are in an interface that is not intimidating.

The biggest challenge in getting my tabletop interface design into a work-ing prototype was the technological hurdles I encountered on the way. I knew I wanted a realistic, tap-through multi-touch demo playing right on the [Math Workbench] tabletop surface [device]. Using your fingers and tangibles in your hand rather

than clicking operational buttons on a computer screen with a mouse was an important goal for me. I went down a rabbit hole trying a number of Processing and Java frame-works that promised a live, multi-touch interface with the added bonus of realistic Microsoft Surface-like gestures. Without much knowledge of Processing, I dove in to the tutori-als and spend a few weeks educating myself about the code that needed to go smoothly in my design. It was about three weeks into my building process when I realized that I was moving at a snail’s pace with the code as I was having a great deal of difficulty customizing the pre-de-signed frameworks to match with the visual design and simulations I had envisioned. The complex code was over my head, and I wasn’t picking it up as quickly as I had anticipated. It was then that I decided I had to give up on the dreams of having a real working multi-touch table, and proceeded down a new path of using my visual design in a prototyping tool called Apple Keynote and Adobe After Effects for minor animation effects. Apple keynote is believed to be one of the best tools available for designers to prototype any interface.

Page 24: Math Workbench process book

24

Page 25: Math Workbench process book

25

Page 26: Math Workbench process book

26

5PrototypeSketches

Page 27: Math Workbench process book

27

Physical education plays a critical role in educating the whole student. Research supports the importance of movement in educating both mind and body. Physical education contributes directly to development of physi-cal competence and fitness. It also helps students to make informed choices and understand the value of leading a physically active lifestyle. The benefits of physical education can affect both academic learning and physical activity patterns of students. The healthy, physically active student is more likely to be academically motivated, alert, and successful. In the preschool and primary years, active play may be positively related to motor abilities and cognitive development. As children grow older and enter adolescence, physical activity may enhance the development of a positive self-concept as well as the abil-ity to pursue intellectual, social and emotional challenges. Throughout the school years, quality physical education can promote social, cooperative and problem solving competencies. Quality physical education programs in our nation’s schools are essential in developing motor skills, physical fitness and understanding of concepts that foster lifelong learning lifestyles.

Why physical interaction?

Page 28: Math Workbench process book

28

Building the tangible object and table+ Cut out geometric wooden pieces made of pine, then painted over

+ Table top made of plexiglas and then a layer of acetate paper on top

Page 29: Math Workbench process book

29

Page 30: Math Workbench process book

30

Page 31: Math Workbench process book

31

Started building my interface in Processing but realized it was getting to complicated and I was running out of time.

Page 32: Math Workbench process book

32

How it worksWhen you place the tangible in the middle of the circle, it will recognize it’s a triangle (and any shape you put on there). Every time you turn the triangle 360 degrees, you will see a new iteration.

Page 33: Math Workbench process book

33

Page 34: Math Workbench process book

34

Page 35: Math Workbench process book

35

Page 36: Math Workbench process book

36

Page 37: Math Workbench process book

37

Page 38: Math Workbench process book

38

Page 39: Math Workbench process book

39

Page 40: Math Workbench process book

40

6BibliographyReference materials and documents

Page 41: Math Workbench process book

41

Albarn, Keith, Smith, Jenn Mial, Steele, Stanford, and Walker, Dinah. The Language of Pat-tern. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.

Baglivo, Jenny A. and Graver, ack E. Incidence and Symmetry in Design and Architecture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983

Henderson, Linda. The Fourth Dimention and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.

Guthrie, Kenneth. The Pythagorean Sourcebook and Library. Grand Rapids: Phanes Press, 1987. The Geometer’s Sketchpad: Dynamic Geometry for the 21st Century, Key Curriculum Press

Mandelbrot, Benoit B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Com-pany, 1983.

Edgar, Gerald A. Measure, Topology, and Fractal Geometry. New York: Springer Verlag New York Inc., 1990.

Mandelbrot, Benoit B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Com-pany, 1983.

Page 42: Math Workbench process book

42

Written & Designed by Connie Wang

Advisor: Brian Lucid

Massachusetts College of Art and Design

Senior Degree Project 2012