Master thesis Remi Eirik Olsen Pilot/Commander Sea King SAR helicopter
Background for the thesis Personal interest in the field – own experience
15 years as a SAR pilot w/o any mentioning of anyAircraft Coordinator-role (ACO)
As opposed to the On Scene Coordinator-role (OSC)
Colleagues that participated in Maxim Gorkij-rescue
Desire to contribute – be ready for the next ”big one”
The implementation of more specific ACO proceduresinto the IAMSAR manual from 2016
Lack of competence and knowledge by key playersand also stakeholders (?)
ACO procedures Procedures designed after Scandinavian Star and
Estonia ship disasters
Swedish, Finnish and Danish JRCC/SAR-officials
Baltic ACO manual IAMSAR 2016
Designed to increase flight safety for, and SAR efficiency from, the aerial Search and Rescue Units (SRUs) involved in large scale SAR ops/MROs
Theoretical perspectives Principles of High Reliability Organizations (HROs)
The Norwegian SAR system considered an HRO
Situation awareness (SA) vs High North reality
Decision making – need for information in a crisis
Improvisation
Methodology Qualitative methodology – descriptive research design
Grounded theory – free of experience…
Hermeneutical approach – interpretative
”Double hermeneutical” – interpreting the interpretor
Experience based hermeneutics
Methods - mixed Semistructured in-depth interviews – relevant personell
DA JRCC, RNoN, NO JRCC, NoCG, 333 Sqdn (MPA)
Participant observation – Exercise NORD 16
Audio-files – Exercise NORD 16
Document studies
IAMSAR, incident reports, White Papers, Exercise Evals. etc
Survey amongst ACO-course participants (quantitative)
DA, SW, FI, NL, LI, BE, NO, CY
E-mail interviews following Exercise NORD 16
Key findings Two possible ACOs in the Norwegian High North
NoCG ship w/helicopter control officer (HCO)
P3 Orion MPA
ACO procedures ”fit” the High North w/vast distances and prolonged transits – ”time to prepare”
High North lack of radio-, radar- and even satellitecoverage
Remedy for lack of comms knowledge based improvisation
Key findings ”Simple but complex” procedures – need for formal education,
training and exercise
Tremendous pressure on the ACOs during Exercise NORD 16
Three transmissions per minute on average
Key findings Capacity to train in the Norwegian SAR system?
The capacities are already out there training…
Large SAR exercises are inadequate
Too seldom, too few crew involved, too restricted, too”political” (show off)
Small-scale frequent SAR exercises amongst key players
Lack of formal education – gap being filled
RNoN has the will, capacity, competence and locations to formally start theoretical education
Civil-Military cooperation paramount
Operative performance –competence, training, exercise
Resulting development Exercise NORD 16
NoCG vessel ”Senja” as ACO and OSC
6 helicopters involved
(P3 Orion MPA cancelled late)
Initiative to small-scale ACO exercise
All participants positive – JRCC, NoCG, 337 Sqdn, NAOC, 330 Sqdn
SAR exercise, evacuation exercise, double hoist operation –planned but not executed due to higher prioritized mission
Full Ice Protection 30minute Run Dry Transmission
Sliding door, Crew Door & Ramp
Ground Clearance Ca. 500mm
183 cm Cabin height
3 Observation Windows
AW101-612 – KEY FEATURES
Active Vibration Attenuation (ACSR)
30minute Dry Run capability XMSNs
BERP III MRB
3 Observation Windows
Crashworthy Structure, Seats, Fuel
System
AW101-611 “CSAR” as baseline for certification
No folding MRB
Engine Configuration (3x GE CT7-8E)
New Automatic Flight Control
System*
Fully articulated Tail Rotor (NEW)
New AESA 3x Flat Panel Radar
Low maintenance workload program
* Including Hover Trim Controller (HTC)
AW101-612 – KEY FEATURES (NORWAY)
DETECTIONAESA Radar (Simultaneous Modes)
Independent Weather Radar HD Electro Optics/IR Sensor
DF & Mobile Phone Detection
TERRAIN AWARENESSHTAWS (Fully Integrated)
3 x Digital Map (Elevation Data)Integrated Synthetic Vision
Low Height System (2 x Rad Alt)Configurable S.A. Overlays
OBSTACLE DETECTIONLaser Obstacle Warning System
Obstacle Proximity LiDARIntegrated Synthetic Vision
AREA NAVIGATION3 x Integrated Digital Maps
High Integrity Navigation Suite2 x Civil GPS, Integrated RadNav
Automatic Nav. Accuracy Monitoring
Jeppesen DatabaseVFR / IFR Navigation AFCS Modes
TRAFFIC AWARENESSIntegrated TCAS II (Overlay on Map)
ADS-B Tx TransmissionsAIS Tx/Rx Capability
IFF TransponderGrowth Option for Link 16
AW101-612 – KEY SA FEATURES
SAR LAYOUT
Flexible Cabin Arrangement
Wireless Passenger & Crew Intercom
Crew Galley & Relief Facilities
Rear Ramp Stowage Area
Adjustable, Rotating & Traversing Crew
Seats
Flexible / Adaptable Medical Rail System
Wet Storage Adjacent to Rescue Station
Stretcher Compatibility with Ground Ambulance
Dedicated System Operator Console
Area
Dual Trauma Station (Gas & Air Provisions)
AW101-612 – KEY CABIN FEATURES
LANDING FOOTPRINT Sea King AW101
Overall Length (rotors turning) 22.15 m 22.83 m
Overall Width (rotors turning) 18.90 m 18.60 m
Main rotor tip clearance 3.69 m 4.11 m
AW101 – 15,6 MGW (AGW 16t) Sea King – 9,7 MGW
AW101-612 – KEY SIZE FEATURES
RANGE AND CAPACITYCOMPARISON
KEY REQUIREMENTS
Req: Must be able to assist two people at the far perimeter of the Norwegian SSR (350-400 nm) with better effect than today. No time limits.
Assist persons in distress on land and in inaccessible
terrain.
Req: Capacity to rescue 20 persons in distress at sea within a range of 150 nautical miles at any point directly out from the straight baseline within two hours and return to a safe place on land
AW101 RoA 2 rescuees. >310nm
AW101 RoA 20 rescuees >250 nm
Sea King RoA20 rescuees~ 53 nm
Sea King RoA2 rescues ~ 210+ nm
2020?