Top Banner
Masonry - Revision March 2008
58

Masonry Revision 2007 08

Dec 25, 2015

Download

Documents

dsacdi

it is very important one
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Masonry - Revision

March 2008

Page 2: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Vertically loaded masonry

Page 3: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Examples• Problem 1• An internal loadbearing masonry wall

has a clear vertical span of 2.5 m and supports a rigid continuous floor together with loads transferred from upper storeys.

• Unfactored vertical loads acting on this masonry are:

• Dead load - 127.5 kN/m• Imposed load - 15.0 kN/m• It is necessary to use a 190 mm high x

140 mm wide aggregate concrete block. What strength block, would be required to take the applied loads?

• Assume designation (iii) mortar is to be used.

• Assuming normal control of manufacture and construction m = 3.5

2500

mm

End conditions

Wall part of 4 storey building

Page 4: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Design loads (?)

• Dead load Gk = 127.5 kN/m• Imposed load Qk = 15.0 kN/m

• Design dead load = f Gk • = 1.4 x 127.5 = 179kN• Design imposed load• = f Qk = 1.6 x 15 = 24• TOTAL = 203 kN/m

Page 5: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Capacity reduction factor Depends on – slenderness ratio and eccentricity of load

• Slenderness ratio = effective height/effective thickness

• 24.3.2 Effective height. 24.3.2.1 Walls• Effective height of a wall :• a) 0.75 times the clear distance between lateral supports which provide

enhanced resistance to lateral movement; or• b) the clear distance between lateral supports which provide simple

resistance to lateral movement.

• Wall clamped in position - Enhanced restraint at top and bottom• Effective height = hef = 2.5 x 0.75 = 1.875 m• Effective thickness = Actual thickness • = tef = t = 0.14 m

OK 2 < 13.39 = 0.14

1.875 =

t

hRatioS

ef

ef 7

Page 6: Masonry Revision 2007 08
Page 7: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Capacity reduction factor Depends on – slenderness ratio and eccentricity of load

• Eccentricity of load.

• Internal wall with no eccentric loads, so eccentricity = 0.00mm

Page 8: Masonry Revision 2007 08

13.4 β = 0.90

Page 9: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Design vertical load capacity/unit length. (Clause 28.2.2)

• Aspect ratio of unit = 190/140 = 1.36

t

N = f or

f.t. = N m

km

k

mmN/ 5.64 =10 x 140 x 0.9

3.5 x 10 x 203 = f 2

3

3

k

Masonry characteristic strength is known.

What units are required?

Page 10: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Solid blocksAspect ratio = 1.36

fk = 5.64, designation (iii) mortar

Interpolate between tables

Inspect table and make a judgement

5.64

Select appropriate parts of table 2 , BS5628 : Part 1

Page 11: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Try blocks of strength 10.4N/mm2

• fk = 6.33N/mm2 ≥ 5.64N/mm2 so OK

)1.42.8)6.00.2

6.036.11

( x )(

)( + 4. = f k

Page 12: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Design example 2• Lower lift of a 4-storey cavity wall carries

factored total load of 130 kN/m. 25kN/m of this is applied at an eccentricity of t/6 to the inner leaf of the bottom lift. The remaining load from the floors above is applied axially to the same leaf.

• What strength of block is required? Calculate the vertical load capacity of this cavity wall.

• Assume• 90mm solid block outer skin• 140mm thick solid block inner skin.• 190mm high units used• 50mm cavity• Designation (iii) mortar m = 3.5 for • Normal (manufacturing /const.) control

End conditions

3000

mm

Lower lift of cavity wall

Page 13: Masonry Revision 2007 08

SolutionCapacity reduction factor

depends on ecc’n of applied load & slenderness ratio

• Eccentricity of 1st floor loading • ex = t/6 = 140/6 =23.3mm• BRE guidance – Lecture notes

• Ecc’n of Resultant total load. • Moments about wall centre

• 130x = 25 x 23.3• So x = 4.48mm = 0.03t• Less than 0.05 t (See Table 8).

23.3mm

105kN 25kN

xmm

Resultant 130kN

Page 14: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Slenderness ratio = effective height/ effective thickness = hef/tef

• Effective height :

• 24.3.2 Effective height. 24.3.2.1 Walls• a) 0.75 times clear dist between lateral supports

which provide enhanced resistance to lateral movement; or

• b) clear dist between lateral supports which provide simple resistance to lateral movement.

• Effective height = 0.75 x 3000 = 2250mm

• Effective thickness : • Greatest of • 2/3(t1 + t2) = 2/3(140 + 90) = 154mm• t1 = 140mm• t2 = 90mm

• Slenderness ratio = 2250/154.1 = 14.6

End conditions

3000

mm

Page 15: Masonry Revision 2007 08
Page 16: Masonry Revision 2007 08

14.6 β = 0.872

Page 17: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Design vertical load capacity/unit length. (Clause 28.2.2)

t

N = f or

f.t. = N m

km

k

mmN/ =10 x 140 x 0.

3.5 x 10 x = f 2

3

3

k 77.386

130

Page 18: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Solid blocksAspect ratio = 1.36

Select appropriate parts of table 2 , BS5628 : Part 1

Interpolate between tables

fk = 3.77,

Inspect table and make a judgement

designation (iii) mortar

3.77

Try a 5.2 N/mm2 unit

Page 19: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Try blocks of strength 5.2N/mm2

• Aspect ratio of unit = h/t = 190/140 = 1.36• Interpolating between Tables 2(c-d), BS 5628

• But 3.86 ≥ 3.73N/mm2 so OK• Use 5.2 N/mm2 unit in wall

2/86.3)5.20.5(6.02

6.036.15.2 mmNfk

kN f.t.

= NcapacityloadverticalActualm

k 3.13410005.3

86.314087.0

Page 20: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Laterally loaded masonry walls

Page 21: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic design example

H=L

L

Free edge

Simply supported

Determine the required thickness of a single leaf wall supported as shown above using the following criteria:

Page 22: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic design example• Characteristic wind load = 0.45 kN/m2

• Height of wall to free edge = 4.5 m• Length of wall between restraints= 4.5 m• Conc. blocks (solid) strength = 7.3 N/mm2

• Normal category const’n control• Category I or II units• Panel not providing stab. to struct.

γf = 1.2 [Clause 18(b)]• Ignore effects of self weight

γm = 3.0

[Table 4]

Page 23: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic design example - Flexural loading

• The design bending moment per unit height of the wall is given by the following expression (Clause 32.4.2).

L W = m 2fk

Page 24: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic design example - Flexural loading

• Bending moment coefficient () depends on– orthogonal ratio (fkb/fkp)

– aspect ratio h/L– support conditions

Page 25: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic design example - Orthogonal ratio - (fkb/fkp)

• Try a 7.3N/mm2 block, 190mm thick

• Determine [fkb and fkp] (Table 3)

• fkb for 100mm wide 7.3 N/mm2 = 0.25

• fkb for 250mm wide 7.3 N/mm2 = 0.15

• fkb for 190mm wide block, = 0.19

(by linear interpolation)

Page 26: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic design example - Orthogonal ratio

• fkp for 100mm wide 7.3 N/mm2 = 0.60

• fkp for 250mm wide 7.3 N/mm2 = 0.35

• fkp for 190mm wide block, = 0.45

(by linear interpolation)

Page 27: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic design example - Orthogonal ratio

0.42 = 0.45

0.19 =

f

f

kp

kb

Orthogonal ratio = fkb/fkp

Page 28: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Aspect ratio

1.0 = 4.5

4.5 =

L

hAspect ratio =

Page 29: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Moment coefficients () Table 8

• From BS 5628 Table 8A• Support conditions-simple• for h/L = 1.0

α = 0.083 with μ = 0.5α = 0.087 with μ = 0.4

• Therefore by linear interpolation• α = 0.0862 when μ = 0.42

μ (required) = 0.42

Page 30: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Applied design moment per unit height

• Since Wk = 0.45 kN/m2 ,

• γf = 1.2,

• L=4.5

• α = 0.0862

m = 0.0862 x 0.45 x 1.2 x 4.52

= 0.943 kNm/m

Page 31: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Design moment of resistance.(Clause 32.4.3)

• For a panel bending in two directions

m

kp Zf =M

Now, fkp = 0.45, t = 190

then M = 0.45 x 1902 x 10-3

3.0 x 6 = 0.903 kNm/m (<0.943)

[Not OK]

Page 32: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Applied moment(Second try)

• Using a 215 block

• fkb = 0.17, fkp = 0.41

• μ = 0.17/0.41 = 0.41

• α = 0.0866

• Hence m = 0.947 kNm/m

Page 33: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Design moment of resistance(Second try)

• Now, fkp = 0.41, t = 215

• M = 0.41 x 2152 x 10-3

3.0 x 6

= 1.053 kNm/m (> 0.947) [Therefore OK]• Therefore use block of thickness 215mm (7.3

N/mm2)

For a panel bending in two directions

m

kp Zf =M

Page 34: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Slenderness limits

(Clause 32.3)• For a panel simply supported on more than one side. h x L 1350 tef

2

• since wall is single leaf tef = t

mm123 1350

104.5x4.5x

1350

hx1t

6

Page 35: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Slenderness limits

(Clause 32.3)• In addition no dimension shall exceed 50 tef. since h and L both = 4.5 then

mm90 50

104.5x t

3

Page 36: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Shear design(Clause 21)

• Consider the wind load to be distributed to the supports as shown below

4.5m

4.5m

45o

Page 37: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Shear design(Clause 21)

Total load to support = γfWkx(loaded area)

Total shear along base

= 1.2 x 0.45 x {(4.5 x 2.25)/2} = 2.734 kN

Assume this is a udl along base

Design SF per metre run, is

kN 0. = 5

2.734 = 61

.4

Page 38: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Shear design(Clause 21)

The design shear stress (vh) is therefore

vh = 0.61 x 103 = 0.0028 N/mm2

215 x 1000

Page 39: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Shear design(Clause 21)

Charac. shear strength (fv) from clause 21

= 0.35 + 0.6 gd

Ignoring self weight, characteristic strength

fv = 0.35 N/mm2

Page 40: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Shear design(Clause 21)

• Design shear stress (vh) limited so

mv

vh

f v

vh = 0.0028 N/mm2

mmN/ 0.14 = 2.5

0.35 =

f 2

mv

v

Therefore OK along base

Page 41: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Shear design(Clause 21)

Total shear to each vertical support

= 1.2 x 0.45 x 2.25 (2.25 + 4.5) = 4.10 kN 2

Assume this load to be a udl up the sides, design shear force per metre run

= 4.10 = 0.91 kN

4.5

Page 42: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Basic example - Shear design(Clause 21)

• Use 2 mm thick anchors into dovetail slots in column.• Charac. strength of each tie = 4.5 kN, (Manuf. Data)

• Place ties at 900 mm centres. Assume m = 3.0.

• Design load resistance per metre run of wall

= 4.5 x 1000 = 1.67 kN > design shear force

3.0 900

Vertical shear adequate

Page 43: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Tutorial - Problem 1

Continuous supports

h

L

Free edge

Simple supports

Page 44: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Determine the max. wind load a single leaf brick wall 103mm thick supported as shown may sustain.

• Height of wall to free edge = 2.6 m• Length of wall between restraints = 3.47 m• Bricks (water absorption between 7.0 and 12.0%)• Mortar of designation (iii) [M6 and M4]• Normal category construction control• Category I or II of units

• Panel not providing stability to structure, γf = 1.2

• In this example, ignore the effects of self weight

γm = 3.1

Page 45: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Tutorial - Problem 2• As for problem 1 but include self weight

Density of the brickwork is 22.0kN/m3

Page 46: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Tutorial - Problem 3

Joint at floor

Concrete columns

Blockwork

BrickworkPLAN

ELEVATION

Page 47: Masonry Revision 2007 08

• Design a cavity wall, 4.5m by 3.375m high to withstand a wind pressure of 0.6 kN/m2.

• Outer leaf - Clay brickwork running past supporting columns – (Water absorption > 12%) – (mortar designation (iii)). [Mortar M4 or M6]– Density 17.0kN/m3

• Inner leaf Blockwork abutting the columns with a soft control joint. – Thickness of leaves = 100 mm.– Density of blockwork = 10.0 kN/m3.

Page 48: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Tutorial - Problem 4

4.0m

1.5m

1.0m

1.5m

1.5m 1.0m 1.5m

Opening

Continuous supports

Design a single leaf wall panel, 4m long by 4m high, with a centrally placed 1.0 x 1.0m window to resist a characteristic wind pressure of 0.6 kN/m2. All edges are considered to be fixed.

γm = 3.0 γf = 1.2

10.4 N/mm2 blocks

Page 49: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Concentrated loads

Page 50: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Question Concentrated loads.

• A 300mm wide x 500mm deep reinforced concrete beam is to be built into a 100mm thick masonry wall. The masonry is assumed to comprise 7.3N/mm2 concrete blocks in designation (iii) [M4] mortar. The blocks are 215mm high and the partial factor for materials has been assessed to be 3.5. The reaction at the end of the beam is 50.0kN and a uniformly distributed load of 20.0kN/m exists along the wall at the level of the top of the beam. The density of the concrete blockwork is 20kN/m3, and the wall is supported 2400mm below the beam on a level slab. For design purposes, assume the wall is pinned at the top and bottom. Is the blockwork selected adequate?

• Can you improve on this design? Discuss what would happen if the wall was 140mm wide?

Page 51: Masonry Revision 2007 08

45o

2400mm

0.4 x 2400 = 960mm

A

B

Figure 1Layout of problem

300 x 500mm deep RC beam

Page 52: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Solution.• Check at level A.• Masonry strength [ht/least dim of blocks • = 2.15] = 6.4N/mm2 Table 2 BS5628 Part 1

• Figure 4 – bearing type 1

• Enhance strength by 1.25, strength • = 6.4 x 1.25 = 8.0N/mm2

• Design strength of masonry • = 8.0/3.5 = 2.28N/mm2

• Stress imposed on masonry • = (50 x 103)/(300 x 100) = 1.67N/mm2 so OK

Page 53: Masonry Revision 2007 08

• Check 0.4h m down.• Masonry strength = βtfk/γm • Determination of β : • Depends on :- • Slenderness ratio = effective height/effective thickness • = 2400/100 = 24• Eccentricity of load. • This needs to be determined 0.4m down. • Axial load [udl along wall over 0.960 x 2 + 0.3 = 2.22m] • = 20 x 2.22 = 44.4kN• Axial load from 1460mm of masonry along 2.22m • = 20 x 0.1 x 1.46 x 2.22 = 6.48kN• Moments about centre line.• 50 x 16.67 = 100.88 x e, so e = 8.3mm = 0.08t• Determination of β : From table 7 and by interpolation• β = 0.47 + 0.4 x 0.03 = 0.482• Stress capacity at 0.4m down = βtfk/γm = 0.482 x 6.4/3.5 =

0.88N/mm2

• Applied stress in masonry = (100.88 x 103)/(2220 x 100) • = 0.45N/mm2 so OK

50.88kN 50.0kN

R = 100.88kN

e

t/6=16.7mm

Page 54: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Other areas

Page 55: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Combined vertical and lateral load

• qlat = (4tn)/ha

h a

qlat

Page 56: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Diaphragm walls

• When would they be used.

• What are the principles of their design

• Advantages and disadvantages

Page 57: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Retaining walls

• Drainage

• Sulphate and frost protection

Page 58: Masonry Revision 2007 08

Reinforced masonry

• Pocket walls

• Infill walls

• Reinforcement

• Details

• Max and min reinforcement