artensite is our friend,” so sayeth the heat treater, but what is martensite, really? And why is a tem- pered martensitic structure the single-minded goal of every heat treater when hardening steel? Let’s learn more. Martensite Formation In order to form martensite we need to heat steel into the aus- tenite field (above Ac 3 ) and quench rapidly enough from the austenite phase to avoid pearlite formation. The rate must be fast enough to avoid the nose of the Time-Tem- perature-Transformation (TTT) curve – the so-called critical cooling rate for the given steel. The formation of martensite involves the structural rearrangement (by shear dis- placement) of the atoms from face-centered cubic (FCC) austenite into a body-centered tetragonal (BCT) martensitic structure. This change is accompa- nied by a large increase in volume and results in a highly stressed condition. This is why martensite has a higher hardness than aus- tenite for the exact same chemistry. The martensite transformation, while not instantaneous, is sig- nificantly faster than diffusion-controlled processes such as ferrite and pearlite formation that have different chemical compositions than the austenite from which they came. Thus, martensite is a meta-stable, strain-induced state that steel finds itself in. The re- sultant steel hardness is (primarily) a function of its carbon con- tent (Fig. 1). Martensite Morphology Morphology is a term used by metallurgists to describe the study of the shape, size, texture and phase distribution of physical ob- jects. Martensite can be observed in the microstructure of steel in two distinctly different forms – lath or plate – depending on the carbon content of the steel (Fig. 2). In general, lath martensite is associated with high toughness and ductility but low strength, while plate martensite structures are much higher in strength but tend to be more brittle and non-ductile. [2] For alloys containing less than approximately 0.60 wt.% car- bon, lath martensite appears as long, thin plates often grouped in packets (Fig. 3). Plate (or lenticular) martensite is found in alloys containing greater than approximately 0.60 wt.% carbon. The mi- crostructure is needle-like or plate-like in appearance across the complete austenite grain (Fig. 4). With carbon contents between 0.60 and 1.00 wt.% carbon, the martensite present is a mixture of lath and plate types. As the carbon content increases, so-called high-carbon mar- tensite twins begin to replace dislocations within the plates. This transformation is accompanied by the volumetric expansion men- tioned earlier, creating (residual) stress in addition to the strains due to interstitial solute atoms. At high carbon levels these stresses can become so severe that the material cracks during transforma- tion when a growing plate impinges on an existing plate. [3] Thus, coarse martensite (Fig. 5) and plate martensite are less desirable structures in most applications. M s and M f Temperatures The martensite transformation begins at the martensite start (M s ) temperature and ends at the martensite finish (M f ) temperature and is influenced by carbon content. Increasing the carbon con- tent of the austenite depresses the M s and M f temperatures, which leads to difficulties in converting all of the austenite to martensite. M s and M f temperatures are also important in welding, as they influence the residual stress state. [5] M s and M f temperatures can be calculated, and if you need to know them for a particular steel, one source for this data is at www.thomas-sourmail.org/martens- ite.html, which lists over 1,000 different steel types. Martensite Daniel H. Herring | 630-834-3017 | [email protected] The Heat Treat Doctor M M 18 June 2011 - IndustrialHeating.com 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 68 65 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Marder (27) Hodge and Orehoski (28) Burns et al. (29) Irvine et al. (30) Kelly and Nutting (31) Kurjumov (32) Litwinchuk et al. (33) Bain and Paxton (34) Jaffe and Gordon (35) Materkowski (36) Hardness, DPH Carbon, wt % 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Hardness, Rockwell C Fig. 1. As-quenched hardness vs. carbon content [1] “