Top Banner
MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007
16

MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

Mar 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Julia McNulty
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

MARPOL Annex VI

TRIPARTITE

TOKYO

20th SEPTEMBER 2007

Page 2: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

IMO & UNILATERAL LEGISLATION ON LOW SULPHUR MARINE FUELS

DATE SHIP TYPE WHERE max. % S REG.

19.05.2005 All Everywhere 4.5 IMO

19.05.2006 All Baltic Sea 1.5 IMO & EU

11.08.2006 All All EU PortsMGO (DMA and DMX)MDO (DMB and DMC)

0.21.5

EU

11.08.2006 Passenger ships EU 1.5 EU

1.01.2007 All aux. & diesel-electric main engines on all ships

24 miles off California shoreMGO (DMA grade)MDO (DMB grade)

-0.5

CARB

11.08.2007 All North Sea & English Channel 1.5 EU

22.11.2007 All North Sea & English Channel 1.5 IMO

1.01.2010 All All EU ports 0.1 EU

1.01.2010 Inland waterway ships All EU inland waterways 0.1 EU

1.01.2010 All aux. & diesel-electric main engines on all ships

24 miles off California shoreMGO (DMA grade) 0.1

CARB

1.01.2012 16 Greek ferries Greek ports 0.1 EU

Page 3: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

ALTERNATIVES on SOx & PM

• A. Base Line - No change in SOx regulations• B. Global + Regional (SECA) + port (mini

SECAs) different S cap values:– (possible lower) Global S cap & lower S cap in

SECAs

– USA – [0.1%] S cap up to [200] nm from shore– BIMCO proposal – 3% global S cap; 1% 0.5% MDO

in SECAs or scrubbers

• C. GLOBAL S CAP (no SECA) :– Mandate 1% 0.5% MDO for all ships– Global S cap or emissions limit but leave the

industry to choose compliance method

Page 4: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

EXPERIENCE WITH SECA

• So far, complinace by LSFO

• Switch from HFO to LSFO depends on the ship’s bunker storage capacity and lay-out

• Standard designs (1 settling & 1 service tanks) provide little flexibility

• Depending on initial S % of the HFO, fuel switch in at least 48 hrs

• 60 hours from HFO with 4.04% S to LSFO with 1.3% S

Page 5: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

SWITCH SEQUENCE IN BASIC DESINGS

• Stop HFO transfer from storage to settling tanks (1 to 3 days prior to entry into SECA)

• Settling tank empty – start transfer of LSFO to the settling tank

• Service tanks almost empty of HFO – start feeding LSFO from settling tank (some 6 hours before entry into SECA)

• Cylinder oil feeding rate adjusted or switch to a lower BN cylinder oil

• Continuous crew attendance/monitoring

Page 6: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

Wärtsila – Low Sulphur Guidelines, 9 January 2006

Page 7: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

FUEL SWITCH OVERBETTER SOLUTIONS

• Simpler for ships with 2 settling & 2 service tanks (few hours)

• Complete segregation between HFO & LSFO systems reduces the fuel switch over to matter of minutes and permits automatic control

• Complete segregation = no risk of incompatibility between HFO & LSFO blends

Page 8: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

Wärtsila – Low Sulphur Guidelines, 9 January 2006

Page 9: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

SECAs & CHANGE OVER AREAS

AUGUST 2007

MAY2006

Source: http://maps.google.com/

ChangeoverArea

Page 10: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

SECAs & CHANGE OVER AREAS

New Changeover Area

Source: http://maps.google.com/

Page 11: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

2012?

2012? ??????

HOW MANY MORE SECAs?

IMPACT ON A LARGE NUMBER OF SHIPS

2012?

2012?

Page 12: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

Wärtsila – Low Sulphur Guidelines, 9 January 2006

Page 13: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

Wärtsila – Low Sulphur Guidelines, 9 January 2006

Page 14: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

SCRUBBERS

- large space required in the ship’s funnel;

- for a main engine of 20 MW, sea water up to 22,000 t/day need to be processed (45t/hr/MW*)

- up to 100 kg/day of hazardous sludge (5kg/day/MW*)

Scrubbers for Pride of Kent

* data supplied by Krystallon

Page 15: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.
Page 16: MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

CONCLUSIONS

• Alternative solutions may require new installations and new operations

• Design standardisation for safe & simpler operation

• Expected contributions from:– Ship operators– Ship designers – Classification Soceities

• Future Tripartite cooperation