Mark-Up Draft 1 Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, July 19, 2006.

Mark-UpDraft 1

Frankfort City Comprehensive PlanMeeting, July 19, 2006

2

Documents – frankfortonline.org

7/13/2006 Adobe.pdf

Comprehensive Plan Draft 1 for printing [164 pp]

7/12/2006 MS Word

Comprehensive Plan Draft 1 [164 pp]

7/12/2006 MS Word

Survey Results [12 pp]

3

Draft 1 – July 12, 2006

4

TOC [Table of Contents] – 10 parts some rearrangement for Draft 2

PART I. Introduction– TOC– Executive Summary– Updating the Comprehensive Plan

State mandate Time Period

– Vision Statement– Planning Process– Acknowledgements

Reorganized

PART II. Community ProfileA. LocationB. ClimateC. History

D. Demographic Analysis, Forecasts & Comparisons1. Age Cohorts

2. Race3. Ethnicity

4. Education5. Forecasts

A. Frankfort City past 20 yearsB. Frankfort City past 10 yearsC. Frankfort City past 3 years

D. Clinton County past 10 yearsE. Hamilton County past 10 years

F. Lebanon City, Boone County past 3 yearsG. Lafayette City, Tippecanoe County past 3 years

H. Cohort Survival [basis: fertility rates, mortality rates, net migration]E. Socioeconomic Analysis, Forecasts & Comparisons

1. Labor Force2. Employment

3. Household Income4. Income by Industry

New to Draft 2

PART III. Growth Management

A.Managing Sprawl Brought by New Development

B. Common Sense Zoning

C. Infrastructure Placement

D. Farming Community Identification

E. Enhanced Tax Base

F. Community Identification

G. Growth Pattern[East or West?]

Land UseA. Agriculturalb. Residential

1. Core Residential2. Traditional Residential3. Multifamily Residential

C. Downtownd. Commercial

1. Neighborhood Commercial2. Community Commercial

3. Regional Commerciale. Industrial

1. Light Industrial2. Manufacturing

3. High-Tech R&DF. Public UsesG. Institutional

H. Planned DevelopmentA. Planned Unit

B. Planned ResidentialC. Planned Commercial

D. Planned Industrial

Future Land Use MapZoning Map

SR 28 West Overlay District MapExisting Land Use Map

Downtown Land Use MapIndustrial Park Land Use Map

New to Draft 2

PART IV. PlacemakingVision

A. Neighborhood IdentificationB. Reutilization of Downtown

C. Managing Sprawl Brought by New Development

PART V. Community LivingA. Abandoned SchoolsB. Neighborhood LivingC. Zoning Enforcement

D. Community CohesivenessPART VI. Community Green

A. Class Three Wind AvailabilityB. Landfill Capacity

C. Frankfort Association of Community Trails (FACT)D. Landscaping Ordinance/Storm-water Ordinance

PART VII. City BeautifulVision

A. Tree City ProgramB. Utility Lines

C. Abandoned Big-BoxD. Adopt an Entrance

PART VIII. Economic Revitalization

Economic AnalysisEconomic Condition

Economic BaseIndustry Clusters [Agglomeration Effect]

Analysis of DemandAnalysis of the Factors of Production

Economic PerformanceGrowth/ Decline of Economic Indicators

Shift-Share AnalysisOverall Economic Development Strategy

Economic Revitalization ProjectsBrownfield RedevelopmentDowntown Revitalization

SR 28 Corridor – Redesign & Adaptive Reuse

Economic Development HousingEco-Industrial Park

Bio-Refinery Industry

New to Draft 2

8

TOC - End

PART IX. AccessA. Emergency Management

B. Public TransportationC. Alternative TransportationD. Downtown Vehicular Flow

Thoroughfare PlanContext Sensitive Design

Street hierarchy1. Arterial streets

2. Collector streets3. Local streets

Regional Thoroughfare PlanPURPOSE

GOALSNational Highway System

PART X. Summary Conclusions

A. Problems, Goals & ObjectivesB. Strategies, Projects & Policies

C. Call for Planning & Development1. Community Development Plans2. Economic Development Task

Force3. Strategic Alliances and Corporate

Sponsors4. Legislation

New to Draft 2

9

Draft 2 Major Elements added to Draft 1

1. Projections and GIS Mapping 8 assumptions constitute 8 scenarios [or less]

2. Future Land Use Map Conventional zoning for existing uses Largely planned developments for growth areas Standards formulated for

planned developments “performance zoning”

3. Add Bio-Refinery strategy to Economic Revitalization4. Executive Summary5. PART X: Summary Conclusions6. More graphic elements

E.g., thoroughfare plan ROW cross-sections

10

Draft 3 as Final Draft

Adobe InDesign replaces MS Word– Very reader-friendly– More graphical– Expanded pages

All corrections from Draft 2 from 9-16-06 Opportunity for detail mark-up by public

officials that are consistent with 9-16-06 resolutions of stakeholders

11

Schedule as Revised

7-19 Review Draft 1 + Survey Results

Direct ICC Staff on Draft 2

8-16 Review Draft 2 + consider Plan of Hispanic Communities [?]

Direct ICC Staff on Draft 3

9-16 Review “Final Draft” for acceptance as a stakeholders’ statement

Lobbying strategy for adoption of Plan

October Plan Commission acts on Comp Plan

November City Council acts on Comp Plan

December City Council considers zoning amendments

12

Signage