Mark Stephenson, Mark Stephenson, Ph.D. Ph.D. National Institute National Institute for Occupational for Occupational Safety Safety and Health and Health DEVELOPING A HEARING LOSS DEVELOPING A HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR CONSTRUCTION WORKERS CONSTRUCTION WORKERS
25
Embed
Mark Stephenson, Ph.D. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health DEVELOPING A HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR CONSTRUCTION WORKERS.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Mark Stephenson, Ph.D.Mark Stephenson, Ph.D.
National InstituteNational Institutefor Occupational Safetyfor Occupational Safety
and Healthand Health
DEVELOPING A HEARING LOSS DEVELOPING A HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR
CONSTRUCTION WORKERSCONSTRUCTION WORKERS
NIOSH HIERARCHY OF CONTROLSNIOSH HIERARCHY OF CONTROLS
Remove the hazardRemove the hazard
Remove the workerRemove the worker
Protect the workerProtect the worker
OVERVIEWOVERVIEW
• REVIEW OF THE PROBLEMREVIEW OF THE PROBLEM
• WHAT WE’VE LEARNED SO FARWHAT WE’VE LEARNED SO FAR
• WHERE WE’RE GOINGWHERE WE’RE GOING
The construction industry The construction industry DOESDOES have a standard: have a standard:29 CFR 1926.52… 29 CFR 1926.52… “Workers exposed to TWAs >90 dBA“Workers exposed to TWAs >90 dBAmust be provided protection.”must be provided protection.”
BUTBUT
Many of the requirements in the manufacturing Many of the requirements in the manufacturing industry standard (29 CFR 1910.95) do not apply:industry standard (29 CFR 1910.95) do not apply:• Periodic noise monitoringPeriodic noise monitoring• DosimetryDosimetry• Periodic audiometric testingPeriodic audiometric testing• Regular worker educationRegular worker education
THE PROBLEMTHE PROBLEM::
So what…People lose their hearing
anyway as they age.
0102030405060708090
500 1000 2000 3000 4000 6000
Hea
ring
Los
s 40 Y.O.50 Y.O.60 Y.O.
Even by age 60, the average healthy Even by age 60, the average healthy person does not have impaired hearing!!person does not have impaired hearing!!
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
500 1000 2000 3000 4000 6000
Dec
ibel
s of
Hea
rin
g L
oss
No Noise
90 dBA
95 dBA
100 dBA
Hearing Levels in 60 Year Old Males asHearing Levels in 60 Year Old Males asa Function of Noise Exposurea Function of Noise Exposure
500 1000 2000 4000 8000
10
0
-10
60
50
40
30
20
20 years in stamping plant
Predicted Hearing LevelsNo Occupational Exposure
Even where the OSHA HCA is being applied, workers are still
losing their hearing!
What Have We Learned So Far?What Have We Learned So Far?
• Noise Levels
• Hearing Levels
• Cost
• Health Communications
The Average 25 Year Old CarpenterThe Average 25 Year Old CarpenterHas 50 Year Old Ears!Has 50 Year Old Ears!
$1,000,000,000
It Would Cost It Would Cost One Billion DollarsOne Billion Dollars to Provide to ProvideHearing Aids to Every UBC MemberHearing Aids to Every UBC Member
Who Needed Them (Who Needed Them (batteries not includedbatteries not included)!)!
Don’tDon’t talk to me about talk to me about
decibels, tell me aboutdecibels, tell me about MONEYMONEY ! !
Cost: What kind of money are we talking about?Cost: What kind of money are we talking about?
Cost of hearing aidsCost of hearing aidsVs.Vs.
Cost of an HCPCost of an HCP
What about workers’ compensation?What about workers’ compensation?
Health Communication Theory = MarketingHealth Communication Theory = Marketing
Health Communications:Health Communications:
Once a noise hazard is identified, why don’t we Once a noise hazard is identified, why don’t we just pass out ear muffs or set out boxes of ear just pass out ear muffs or set out boxes of ear plugs? plugs?
Without proper training, any hearing Without proper training, any hearing protector that can be worn wrong, protector that can be worn wrong,
will be worn wrong!will be worn wrong!
29
21 2326 26
2217
137
25
1
85
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Dec
ibel
s
Plug A Plug B Plug C Plug D Plug E Plug F Plug G
Available protection vs. the amount of protection obtained by untrained workers.
Likely protection as worn by untrained worker
Amount of protection listed on the box
People have MANY reasons for not using hearing protectors. (AKA: You can lead a person to hearing protectors, but you can’t get him/her to wear them.)
• Comfort• Convenience• Cost • Communications / hear important sounds
THERE ARE OVER 200 DIFFERENT HEARING PROTECTORS.
EVERYONE CAN FIND A PROTECTOR THAT MEETS THEIR NEEDS. THE BEST HEARING PROTECTOR IS THE ONE THAT’S WORN!
Effect of not wearing your hearing protectorEffect of not wearing your hearing protectoron the amount of effective noise reductionon the amount of effective noise reduction
Blah, blah, blah…Blah, blah, blah...
Education and Training Must NOT JustFill a Square
How do you know what How do you know what the workers’ concerns the workers’ concerns and beliefs are?and beliefs are?
Just ask me.I’ll tell you
what I need.
Barriers cited by coal miners
for not wearing HPDs:
Comfort Poke Out Eardrum
Communication Cords Get Caught
Convenience Earcup Too BigRoof “Talk” Warning Sounds
47
33
52
63
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Pre Post
Non-STSSTS
Percent of Workers Who Wore Hearing Percent of Workers Who Wore Hearing ProtectorsProtectors
INFLUENCING HEARING PROTECTORINFLUENCING HEARING PROTECTORUSE AMONG WORKERSUSE AMONG WORKERS
Health communication theory has proven educationand training must address two concepts:
Remove Barriers Develop Self-Efficacy
uoGp
uoEssaenLl
ORDB
NESE
MFTN
A YD
Conduct FocusGroups
MeasureSPLs & HTLs
ObserveBehaviors
Analyze Audio-metric Data
AdministerSurvey
Analyze Data
Develop Training
Re-administerSurvey
Analyze Data
Modify Training
Removing Barriers andDeveloping Self-Efficacyis an Iterative Process
How Do You Remove Barriers & Develop Workers’How Do You Remove Barriers & Develop Workers’Self-Efficacy?Self-Efficacy?
This is your ear.This is your ear. This is your ear on noise.This is your ear on noise.Any questions?Any questions?