Goldsmiths, University of London. Department of Theatre and Performance [Explore the ways in which traditionally marginalized experience is foregrounded in the work of any two writers studied on the course] PLAGIARISM This is an extremely serious matter and any occurrence is always dealt with formally by the Board of Examiners. Please read carefully the following statement from the Examinations Office: “You are reminded that all work submitted as part of the requirements for any examination of the University of London must be expressed in your own words and incorporate your own ideas and judgements. Plagiarism – this is the presentation of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own – must be avoided, with particular care in course-work and essays and reports written in your own time. Direct quotations from the published or unpublished work of others must always be clearly identified as such by being placed inside quotation marks, and a full reference to their source must be provided in the proper form. Remember that a series of short quotations from several different sources, if not clearly identified as such, constitutes plagiarism, just as much as a single unacknowledged long quotation from a single source. Equally, if you summarise another person’s ideas or judgements, you must refer to that person in your text, and include the work referred to in your bibliography. Failure to observe these rules may result in an allegation of cheating. You should therefore consult your tutor or course convenor if you are in any doubt about what is permissible. Recourse to the services of ‘ghost writing’ agencies (for example in the preparation of essays or reports) is strictly forbidden, and students who make use of the services of such agencies render themselves liable for an academic penalty. Word-processing services which offer ‘correction/improvement of English’ should not be used”. Clearly, any instance of plagiarism within an essay, examination or dissertation, makes the whole work suspect. It will render your work invalid for examination and assessment purposes and undermines the entire value of a personal and scholarly response to your subject. Self-plagiarism is also referred to in the following statement, also issued by the Examinations Office: Candidate Number 33299967 Year of Study Year 2 Module Modernism and Postmodernity B- Women, Feminism and Playwriting Module Code DR52020A Word Count 3710 Module Convenor Ben Levitas Tutor for this element Deidre Osborne
25
Embed
Marginalisation in Three Women by Sylvia Plath and Her Naked Skin by Rebecca Lenkiwicz
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Goldsmiths, University of London.Department of Theatre and Performance
[Explore the ways in which traditionally marginalizedexperience is foregrounded in the work of any two writers
studied on the course]
PLAGIARISMThis is an extremely serious matter and any occurrence is always dealt with formally by the Board of Examiners. Please read carefully the following statement from the Examinations Office:“You are reminded that all work submitted as part of the requirements for any examination of the University of London must be expressed in your own words and incorporate your own ideas and judgements. Plagiarism – this is the presentation of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own – must be avoided, with particular care in course-work and essays and reports written in your own time. Direct quotations from the published or unpublished work of others must always be clearly identified as such by being placed inside quotation marks, and a full reference to their source must be provided in the proper form. Remember that a series of short quotations from several different sources, if not clearly identified as such, constitutes plagiarism, just as much as a single unacknowledged long quotation from a single source. Equally, if you summarise another person’s ideas or judgements, you must refer to that person in your text, and include the work referred to in your bibliography. Failure to observe these rules may result in an allegation of cheating. You should therefore consult your tutor or course convenor if you are in any doubt about what is permissible. Recourse to the services of ‘ghost writing’ agencies (for example in the preparation of essays or reports) is strictly forbidden, and students who make use of the services of such agencies render themselves liable for an academic penalty. Word-processing services which offer ‘correction/improvement of English’ should not be used”.Clearly, any instance of plagiarism within an essay, examination or dissertation, makes the whole work suspect. It will render your work invalid for examination and assessment purposes and undermines the entire value of apersonal and scholarly response to your subject.Self-plagiarism is also referred to in the following statement, also issued by the Examinations Office:
Candidate Number
33299967
Year of Study Year 2
Module Modernism and Postmodernity B- Women, Feminism and Playwriting
Module CodeDR52020A
Word Count 3710
Module Convenor
Ben Levitas
Tutor for thiselement
Deidre Osborne
“You are reminded that you may not present substantially the same material in any two pieces of work submitted for assessment, regardless of the form of assessment. For instance, you may not repeat substantially the same material in a formal written examination or in a dissertation it if has already formed part of any essay submitted for assessment. This does not prevent you from referring to the same texts, examples or case studies as appropriate, provided you do not merely duplicate the same material.”
Marginalisation is what occurs when a group of people
experience powerlessness and exclusion, being made to
feel less important or relegated to a lower position in
society. Those in traditionally marginalised groups must
learn to be bicultural, or fit in with the dominant
culture to be able to survive, even if they do not share
the same perspective as the status quo. Strong
objectivity, or feminist objectivity, supported by
Standpoint Theory is a term created by feminist theorist
Sandra Harding and is the theory that the understanding
of the perspectives of marginalised and oppressed
individuals creates a more objective understanding of the
world. Through the phenomenon of being the outsider-
within, these individuals are in a position to be able to
recognise unique behavioural traits that those in the
dominant culture are unable to recognise or understand.
In submitting this work I confirm I haveread and understood the regulations relatingto plagiarism and academic misconduct that Iaccepted when I submitted my assessment
“Standpoint theory gives voice to the marginalised groups
by allowing them to challenge the status quo as the
outsider within. The status quo representing the dominant
white male position of privilege.” 1(Buzzanell, 2003,
p53). In both Her Naked Skin, by Rebecca Lenkiewicz and
the poem Three Women by Sylvia Plath, there is evidence
of female marginalisation and the oppression women faced
in the patriarchal society. In Her Naked Skin, we explore
the sexual relationship between Celia and Eve, two women
from different social backgrounds incarcerated in
Holloway Prison for their actions as suffragettes.
Throughout history and at the time of writing, sexual
love and desire between women has been greeted with a
sense of scepticism, and the concept of ‘female
homosexuality’ and lesbianism was often completely
denied, although male homosexuality was acknowledged and
disgraced by society. The persecution these women faced
led to this minority collective to become marginalised by
society and not taken seriously. Three Women is a poem
1 Buzzanell, Patrice M. (2003). "A Feminist Standpoint Analysis of Maternity and Maternity Leave for Women with Disabilities". Women and Language 26 (2): 53–65.
that shares three women’s situations in regards to
fertility and child bearing. All three women represent
the rejection of motherhood through the telling of each
voice’s experience of pregnancy. Women have been
marginalised in society as it is often wrongly assumed
that the woman’s sole purpose is to reproduce. However,
Plath explores how the pressure of child bearing and
expectation from society is not realistic for women to
often achieve, with the dominant group (male) unable to
understand the difficulties associated with being and
becoming a mother. “All healthy women are biologically
potential mothers, but not all women are mothers in
practice; infertility, childlessness, conception,
paternity, pregnancy, childbirth, motherhood,
breastfeeding and care of dependent children are all
variable social concepts of behaviour which occur in
historically variable social relationships.”2
(Ramazanoglu, 1989, p70).
2 Caroline Ramazonoglu. (1989). Women Against Men- Feminist Knowledge of Women's Oppression. In: Feminism and the Contradictions of Oppression. London: Routledge. 70
Originally written for radio in 1962, Three Women
consists of three intertwining monologues, all
contextualised by a dramatic setting, ‘A maternity ward
and round about’ 3 (Plath, 1969). In this setting, the
three women are patients, each with their own story to
tell. Plath identifies three major situations using the
three voices to portray some form of female stereotype;
the adoring wife, the office worker/secretary and the
college student. Plath’s experiences of marginalisation
are important to note in regards to this poem, as Plath
felt like a victim to the men in her life: her father,
her husband and the male dominated literary world she
tried so desperately to break. This poem can be
understood as a response to these feelings of oppression,
with male figures in the poems able to be interpreted as
all male forces she encountered.
3 Sylvia Plath. (1981). Three Women. In: Ted Hughes The Collected Poems of Sylvia Plath. New York: Buccaneer Books. 76.
At the beginning of the poem, all three women are
pregnant, and Plath explores the difference in their
situations as the poem ends. The first voice is going
into labour, but is very calm and almost ambivalent about
the process “I am dumb and brown, I am a seed about to
break”. 4(Plath, 1969). She identifies with the earth and
is characterised by its abundant fertility, rather than
the moon, often seen as a symbol of sterility in Plath’s
work. The pain described in her labour emphasises that
although women are biologically prepared to bear
children, the process of childbirth is not simple, and is
depicted with violence, “There is no miracle more cruel
than this. I am dragged by the horses, the iron hooves. I
last. I last it out. I accomplish a work” 5 (Plath, 1962,
p76). Though she will shed her “dead self” 6 (Plath, 1962,
p76) she must go through much pain first. The wife aims
for the image of the ‘perfectly achieving mother’, but
Plath creates a more human and relatable character in the
4 Sylvia Plath. (1981). Three Women. In: Ted Hughes The Collected Poems of Sylvia Plath. New York: Buccaneer Books. 76.
5 Ibid.6 Ibid.
fact that destructive forces threaten her achievement.
The Second Voice is characterised by sterile, bleak
imagery, with constant reference to the colour white,
evoking a stark and clinical atmosphere. The secretary’s
voice recalls the exact moment when she realises she has
miscarried, the implication of her failure as a mother,
“when I first saw it, the small red seep, I did not
believe it”7 (Plath, 1962, p76). In a similar vein to the
wife, this struggle to ‘achieve’ is central to the second
voice, leading to her self-hatred and feelings of
inadequacy as a woman, “I can love my husband, who will
understand. Who will love me through the blur of my
deformity as if I had lost an eye, a leg, a tongue”.8
(Plath, 1962, p76). This element of inadequacy and
societal expectation is highlighted in Standpoint Theory,
“Women’s activity as institutionalised has a double
aspect- their contribution to subsistence, and their
contribution to childrearing…women as a sex are
institutionally responsible for producing both goods and
human beings and all women are forced to become the kinds
7 ibid8 Ibid.
of human beings who can do both.”9 The Second Voice is the
dominant voice in the poem, and her situation is
presented with more detail and emphasis than the other
two voices of Three Women. The language used in her
verses is heavy with mechanical imagery, in contrast to
the images of plants and nature used for the Wife
character, and the animals and plants in the Girl
character. She also ends the poem, with a hopeful
element, “I am a wife. The city waits and aches. The
little grasses crack through stone, and they are green
with life”10 (Plath, 1962, p79). This could be perceived
as an acceptance of her infertility, and her gratitude of
having a loving husband, or contradictorily, that she has
been able to conceive again and she is pregnant.
The third voice is of the college student, who can
be interpreted, according to Marta Perez Novales of the
9 Nancy M. Hartsock. (1998). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism: The Sexual Division of Labour. In: Virginia Held and Alison Jaggar The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Oxford: Westview Press. 11710 Sylvia Plath. (1981). Three Women. In: Ted Hughes The Collected Poems of Sylvia Plath. New York: Buccaneer Books. 79.
University of Barcelona, as a young woman who has fallen
pregnant against her will and has been raped, due to the
imagery we encounter. Novales theorises, “She experiences
her own biological fertility as "dangers: doves and words
J Stars and showers of gold - conceptions, conceptions!"
the "showers of gold" being an allusion to the classical
myth of Danae, who was impregnated by Zeus against her
will.11” The theory is then further explored and we
further are lead to understand how this Voice deals with
unwanted pregnancy. “The image of the "swan" with a
"white, cold wing", associated with a "snake" -a
traditional phallic symbol, and a symbol of evil in the
Bible-, also suggests rape, as in the legend of Zeus
adopting the form of a swan to rape Leda.”12 The theory
that the student character was raped is logical in terms
of her speech, the anger and fear she shows throughout
the poem.
11 Marta Perez Novales. (1993). THE THEME OF FEMALE CREATIVITY IN SYLVIA PLATH'S "THREE WOMEN. A POEM FOR THREE VOICES". Available: http://www.raco.cat/index.php/bells/article/viewFile/120311/164734. Last accessed 27/04/2015.
12 Ibid.
Each female character, or ‘voice’ in Three Women is
constantly under the dominance of the status quo, with
constant reference and comparisons being made between
these voices and the male figures each encounters in
their own experience. The term ‘flatness’, which is
prevalent in the poem, is solely used to describe men,
with the second voice describing the men in her office
as, “They were so flat! There was something about them
like cardboard, and now I had caught it.”13(Plath, 1962,
p76). Furthermore, this does not only draw attention to
the difference in body, but the implication that she has
‘caught it’ sounds like this ‘flatness’ is a disease, the
fact that she has miscarried makes her seem diseased and
abnormal. This reference to shape is evocative imagery
regarding the spherical nature of a woman during
pregnancy, the dome like aspect of their stomachs almost
cartoon like in comparison to the slimmer, flatter figure
of the men. This awareness of being so physically
different in carrying a child further isolates these
women. This idea of physical difference is again 13 Sylvia Plath. (1981). Three Women. In: Ted Hughes The Collected Poems of Sylvia Plath. New York: Buccaneer Books. 77.
highlighted in the third Voice, “The doctors move among
us as if our bigness frightened the mind…They are to
blame for what I am, and they know it. They hug their
flatness like a type of health.” (Plath, 1962, p76).14 The
Third Voice distinguishes her “mountainy” self from the
“flatness” of those around her, who appear to not
understand the conflict in which she is going through.
Her awareness of another self, one more dark and powerful
has separated her from the one dimensional, ‘flat’ aspect
of her old self that was considered ‘normal’ by those
around her. She feels that anyone else experiencing the
same split condition would “go mad with it.”15 (Plath,
1962, 78). The blame she places on the doctors (a group
of men) is in reference to her rape and unwanted
pregnancy, as although men have to care for a child
paternally they are not physically bound to their unborn
child in the same way as a pregnant woman is to hers. “In
early pregnancy the stirring of the foetus felt like
ghostly tremors of my own body, later, like the movements
of a being imprisoned in me; but both sensations were my
14 Ibid.15 ibid.
sensations, contributing to my own sense of physical and
psychic space”.16 This roundness is something that these
men don’t understand, and the normality seems to be the
flatter, more typically masculine form, “It is these men
I mind. They are so jealous of anything that is not flat!
They are jealous gods that would have the whole world
flat because they are”.17 (Plath, 1962, 78).
“Men” seem to be a symbol not only for the “normal” world
the poet links to her normal self, but also, form,
control, repression and expectation, whereas these women
are connected to nature, and seem to think more deeply
than these men.
“The identification of women with the physical ability to
nurture children within their bodies, and to bring them
into the social world through a mysterious but messily
physical process of birth, does seem to put women really
16 Nancy M. Hartsock on Adrienne Rich in Of Woman Born. (1998). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism: The Sexual Division of Labour. In: Virginia Held and Alison Jaggar The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Oxford: Westview Press. 116.17 Sylvia Plath. (1981). Three Women. In: Ted Hughes The Collected Poems of Sylvia Plath. New York: Buccaneer Books. 77.
closer to nature than men”. 18 Presenting women in this
light in comparison to men harks back to Hartsock and
Standpoint theory again,
“Women and men then, grow up with personalities affected
by different boundary experiences, differently
constructed and experienced inner and outer worlds, and
preoccupations with different relational issues.”19
Hartsock continues, “This early experience forms an
important ground for the female sense of self as
connected to the world and the male sense of self as
separate, distinct, and even disconnected…as a result,
women define and experience themselves and men do not”.20
Plath presents these three women as having been
marginalised due to the unrealistic expectations pushed
upon them by society to achieve perfection in motherhood.
18 Caroline Ramazanoglu. (1989). Feminist Knowledge of Women's Oppression. In: Carolina Ramazanoglu Feminism andthe Contradictions of Oppression. London: Routledge. 70.
19 Nancy M. Hartsock. (1998). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism: The Sexual Division of Labour. In: Virginia Held and Alison Jaggar The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Oxford: Westview Press. 117.
20 Ibid.
This striving to achieve what is perceived by society to
be the most normal and natural thing for a woman to go
through is what unites these three women, and it has been
argued that each of these women represent Plath at some
stage of her life and her battle with fertility and
motherhood. This patriarchal expectation and desire for
children required the mate to be prepared to give her
life to her child, and being a mother.” The couple is a
fundamental unity with its two halves riveted together,
and the cleavage of society along with the line of sex is
impossible. Here we find the basic trait of woman: she is
the Other in a totality where the two components are
necessary to one another”,21 (Simone De Beauvoir, 1949,
p679). This idea of the ‘other’ and masculine dominance
is further explained, “In truth woman has not been
socially emancipated through man’s need- sexual desire
and the desire for offspring- which makes the male
dependent for satisfaction upon the female”.22 (Simone De
Beauvoir, 1949).
21 Simone De Beauvoir, Extracts from The Second Sex (1953 trans. Into English) extract from Alice S. Rossi, ed. TheFeminist Papers, New York: Bantum Books, 1973 p 672-705.22 Ibid.
Her Naked Skin was premiered in 2008 at The National
Theatre, and was the first original play written by a
female writer that was performed there. Lenkiewicz
explores in this play the struggle for love and equality
for two lesbian suffragettes from different class
backgrounds; at a time when having homosexual desire
(between women) was seen as ‘pathological’. Nineteenth
century doctors and physicians believed that lesbianism
stemmed from cerebral abnormalities, and was an inherited
diseased condition of the central nervous system,
“ The new scientific ‘knowledge’ defining lesbianism as a
medical problem, combined with society’s anxieties over
women’s increased independence, ensured that romantic
friendships, previously tolerated and encouraged, would
now be regarded as deviant, anti-social, and dangerous”23
(Susan Kingsley Kent, 1987, p53).
To some suffragette women during this period, refusal to
take part in heterosexual relationships was intrinsically
linked to their political standing: these women did not
23 Susan Kingsley Kent (1987). Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860-1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 53.
want to be the property of their husbands, and found more
attraction, desire and understanding in women,
“The lesbian feminist case against institutionalised
heterosexuality, however, has proved divisive since most
women remain self identified as heterosexual…problem
could also be posed as one of insufficient consideration
of the potential or more fulfilling women experience
sexuality, what they know of sex, and what they regard as
Celia’s relationship with her husband William is not
initially presented as unhappy as much as ambivalent.
When asked about whether she understands her husband, Eve
responds with,
“I’m not supposed to. I’m his wife. We grew up together.
I adored him from age eight to eleven. So I suppose we
had three good years”.25 (Lenkiewicz, 2013, p238)
24 Caroline Ramazanoglu. (1989). Divisions between Women- Into the Impassé. In: Carolina Ramazanoglu Feminism and the Contradictions of Oppression. London: Routledge. 70.25
Rebecca Lenkiewicz. (2013). Act One Scene Twelve. In: Rebecca Lenkiewicz Rebecca Lenkiewicz, Plays: Her Naked Skin. London: Faber and Faber. 238
Celia describes a scenario in the prison yard between the
suffragettes with fondness, and this is where we can see
her definition of love,
‘One was about eighteen the other perhaps thirty. The
girl’s hair kept blowing into her face and eyes and her
companion kept brushing it away for her because the girl
needed to keep her hands warm in her pockets. The friend
understood that.’26 (Lenkiewicz, 2013, p271)
As Celia and Eve are from such different social
backgrounds, their relationship is instantly unequal. For
Celia, it seems that this romantic affair between her and
Eve is passionate and dramatic, perhaps an escape from
her unfulfilled marriage,
“Women are prisoners in their own home. They don’t even
realise it”.27 (Lenkiewicz, 2013, p247). Even though she
has never been with a woman sexually before, she talks of
their relationship in a very laidback, casual way,
“Because I haven’t. With a woman. I’ve had affairs,
darling. Just a few”.28 (Lenkiewicz, 2013, p267). Celia is
also much older than Eve, and has five children of her 26 ibid.27 ibid.28 ibid.
own. As the play progresses, we learn of Celia’s sexual
dissatisfaction with William, and we feel sympathy for
her character for being in such an uncomfortable
situation, when she asks her husband to turn on the
lights,
“ I felt your cold sweat of relief every time it was
done. I felt you reclaim yourself…Weeping. You put all
your bodily effort in to keeping your tears silent. So
much so that I didn’t turn around and ask you what was
wrong. Or, try to touch you again”29 (Lenkiewicz, 2013,
p271). However, Eve is in love with Celia, and is almost
a daughter figure, possessed by the idea of this older,
wiser woman. Eve admits only ever to have slept with one
man, and the thought repulsed her,
“He always wanted the lamp turned up full. He said he
wanted to see the things I was doing to him and that I
should see them too… [I was] old enough. I wasn’t a
child. I felt nausea.”30 (Lenkiewicz, 2013, p166).
Lenkiewicz presents the audience with two types of
lesbian relationships found in the suffrage movement: one
29 ibid.30 ibid.
born out of genuine love and desire for another woman,
and one born of intrigue and the feelings of freedom
found outside a traditional heterosexual marriage.
Although this affair is kept secret, (fortunately for
these characters), the perception of woman in the eyes of
men in this play is negative, especially towards the
suffragettes. Force-feeding was used on Suffragettes who
went on hunger strike once they had been sent to prison
in an act of protest. Usually associated with women who
were well educated, it was traditionally a method used on
women held in asylums and was a controversial method,
frowned upon by many members of the public. In an
exchange between William and Curzon, William makes a
remark about Celia,
“Hasn’t lost her appetite lately?”31(Lenkiewicz, 2013,
p258) This crude remark on the hunger strike protest is
later followed with,
“Go on Cain. Save your money and spend it on your wife.
Buy her a square meal. Or a gag” (Lenkiewicz, 2013,
p260). This disregard and mockery toward the suffragettes
31 ibid.
was not uncommon in this era, as these men thought these
women were being reactionary and pathetic.
The patriarchal world and the rise of the
‘sexologist’ gave those that disagreed with homosexuality
to attack lesbians under the guise of ‘science’.
“If lesbians were ‘perverted’, ‘inverted’ women who
preferred female companionship, then the suffrage
movement seemed a lesbian hotbed… He32 claimed that
women’s loving relationships were based in eroticism and
pathological. He established that lesbians could be
mannish, working class and cross dressers or feminine,
genteel and educated women”33 (Zimmerman, 2000, p742).
This idea of ‘inverted’ sexuality led to the
medicalization of lesbians. By the mid to late 19th
century, Freud’s ‘Hysteria’ (or sometimes female
hysteria) came to refer to what is today considered to be
‘sexual dysfunction’. Typical treatment was massage of
the patient’s genitatilia, administered by a physician,
32 ‘He’ is referring to British Sexologist Havelock Ellis33 Bonnie Zimmerman. (2000). Suffrage Movement. In: BonnieZimmerman Lesbian Histories and Cultures: An Encyclopaedia. New York: Garland Publishing Inc. 742
and later on, vibrations or sprays of water to cause
orgasm,
“The American neurologist George Beard defined inversion
as when ‘men become women and women men, in their tastes,
conduct, character, feelings and behaviour’. His
definition established the homosexual as the opposite of
their biological sex, based on the idea that the “third
sex,” or homosexual, experienced a complete reversal of
gender role and identity.”34
It seems that although Lenkiewicz explores fairly
obvious lesbian stereotypes for characters, and does not
delve as deeply into Eve and Celia’s relationship as she
could, but Her Naked Skin and Plath’s Three Women
illustrate how as a female, from two different societies,
we can be marginalised. At the forefront of this
marginalisation is the fact that these characters are
women, and both 1960’s American and late 19th Century
Britain was run by the patriarchy (as they still are
today). All characters encountered in the plays are under34 Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT
Generation UK. Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies,
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK.
the dominance of men, and fit into Hegel’s slave/master
theory.
“Hegel’s analysis of the struggle inherent in the
master/slave relationship gave rise to the insight that
oppression and injustice are better analysed and
understood from the point of view of the slave than from
that of the master.”35 Therefore, in order to understand
how a minority have been marginalised, we must understand
primarily the perspective of the oppressed. Both the play
and the poem demonstrate the hardships and injustice
faced as a woman, and the expectation from the patriarchy
to convene to a societal norm, whether that norm is a
heterosexual marriage or being able to bear children.