This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Figure 4.3 (a) Schematic illustration of grains, grain boundaries, and particles dispersed throughout the structure of a two-phase system, such as a lead-copper alloy. The grains represent lead in solid solution in copper, and the particles are lead as a second phase. (b) Schematic illustration of a two-phase system consisting of two sets of grains: dark and light. The dark and the light grains have separate compositions and properties.
Figure 4.4 (a) Cooling curve for the solidification of pure metals. Note that freezing takes place at a constant temperature; during freezing, the latent heat of solidification is given off. (b) Change in density during the cooling of pure metals.
Figure 4.5 Phase diagram for nickel-copper alloy system obtained at a slow rate of solidification. Note that pure nickel and pure copper each has one freezing or melting temperature. The top circle on the right depicts the nucleation of crystals. The second circle shows the formation of dendrites (see Section 10.2). The bottom circle shows the solidified alloy with grain boundaries.
Figure 4.6 Mechanical properties of copper-nickel and copper-zinc alloys as a function of their composition. The curves for zinc are short, because zinc has a maximum solid solubility of 40% in copper.
Figure 4.7 The lead-tin phase diagram. Note that the composition of eutectic point for this alloy is 61.9% Sn – 38.1% Pb. A composition either lower or higher than this ratio will have a higher liquidus temperature.
Figure 4.8 The iron-iron carbide phase diagram. Because of the importance of steel as an engineering material, this diagram is one of the most important of all phase diagrams.
Figure 4.9 The unit cells for (a) austenite, (b) ferrite, and (c) martensite. The effect of percentage of carbon (by weight) on the lattice dimensions for martensite is shown in (d). Note the interstitial position of the carbon atoms (see Fig. 1.9). Also note, the increase in dimension c with increasing carbon content: this effect causes the unit cell of martensite to be in the shape of a rectangular prism.
Figure 4.10 Schematic illustration of the microstructures for an iron-carbon alloy of eutectoid composition (0.77% carbon) above and below the eutectoid temperature of 727°C (1341°F).
Microstructure of Steel Formed from Eutectoid Composition
Figure 4.11 Microstructure of pearlite in 1080 steel formed from austenite of a eutectoid composition. In this lamellar structure, the lighter regions are ferrite, and the darker regions are carbide. Magnification: 2500x.
Figure 4.12 Phase diagram for the iron-carbon system with graphite (instead of cementite) as the stable phase. Note that this figure is an extended version of Fig. 4.8.
Figure 4.13 Microstructure for cast irons. Magnification: 100x. (a) Ferritic gray iron with graphite flakes. (b) Ferritic ductile iron (nodular iron) with graphite in nodular form. (c) Ferritic malleable iron. This cast iron solidified as white cast iron with the carbon present as cementite and was heat treated to graphitize the carbon.
Figure 4.15 (a) Hardness of martensite as a function of carbon content. (b) Micrograph of martensite containing 0.8% carbon. The gray plate-like regions are martensite; they have the same composition as the original austenite (white regions). Magnification: 1000x.
Figure 4.16 Hardness of tempered martensite as a function of tempering time for the 1080 steel quenched to 65 HRC. Hardness decreases because the carbide particles coalesce and grow in size, thereby increasing the interparticle distance of the softer ferrite.
Figure 4.17 (a) Austenite-to-pearlite transformation of iron-carbon alloy as a function of time and temperature. (b) Isothermal transformation diagram obtained from (a) for a transformation temperature of 675°C (1274°F). (c) Microstructures obtained for a eutectoid iron-carbon alloy as a function of cooling rate.
Hardness and Toughness in Steel as a Function of Carbide Shape
Figure 4.18 (a) and (b) Hardness and (c) toughness for annealed plain-carbon steel as a function of a carbide shape. Carbides in the pearlite are lamellar. Fine pearlite is obtained by increasing the cooling rate. The spheroidite structure has sphere-like carbide particles.
Mechanical Properties of Steel as a Function of Composition and Microstructure
Figure 4.19 Mechanical properties of annealed steels as a function of composition and microstructure. Note in (a) the increase in hardness and strength and in (b) the decrease in ductility and toughness with increasing amounts of pearlite and iron carbide.
Figure 4.20 (a) End-quench test and cooling rate. (b) Hardenability curves for five different steels, as obtained from the end-quench test. Small variations in composition can change the shape of these curves. Each curve is actually a band, and its exact determination is important in the heat treatment of metals for better control of properties.
Figure 4.22 The effect of again time and temperature on the yield stress of 2014-T4 aluminum alloy. Note that, for each temperature, there is an optimal aging time for maximum strength.