8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
1/25
Managing eGovernanceInitiatives: A PhasedApproach with Performance
Measures
Lionel Pearce
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
2/25
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
3/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 3
From The Australian, 24 Feb 2004
Journalists
interpretation of the
Australian National
Audit Office review of
federal websites
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
4/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 4
Australian National Audit Office
Recommendations (ANAO, 2004)
Implement appropriate policies for monitoring andevaluating Internet services
Define objectives for Websites and portals
Conduct research to reveal access to the site by differentusers, the needs of users and the benefits they gain
Develop business cases and clear objectives forservices
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
5/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 5
In other words .
Apply Management Principles to
electronic governance initiatives
Plan
Organise
LeadControl
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
6/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 6
Is There a Management Model
Appropriate for eGovernance?
We can find out by:
1. Examining history
2. Determining current thinking
3. Assessing shortcomings
4. Synthesising a solution.
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
7/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 7
eGovernment vs eGovernance
Using ICTs as anotherchannel between
government andcitizens, businessesand other governmentsfor delivery ofinformation,transactions andservices
Transforming publicadministration using
enabling ICTs toenhance relationshipsbetween governmentand the community andto provide governancemore suited to theInformation Age
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
8/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 8
eGovernance Requires CHANGE
Change is difficult to manage
Where change involves Innovation, italso introduces considerable risks
Management of change is a means of
mitigating those risks
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
9/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 9
A Stages of Growth model has
been deemed appropriate for:
Previous generations of ICTs:
Database Technologies (Nolan, 1979) End-User Computing (Huff, et al., 1988)
Enterprise Resource Planning (Holland & Light,2001)
eGovernment (Layne & Lee, 2001; Moon, 2002)
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
10/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 10
The Layne & Lee Stages of Growth
Model for eGovernment(Layne & Lee, 2001, p. 124)
Catalogue
Transaction
VerticalIntegration
Horizontal
Integration
Techni c
al/Organisat i
onalC
omplexity
Sim
ple
Comp
lex
IntegrationSparse Complete
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
11/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 11
Moon Stages of Growth Model for
eGovernment
Stage 1
Information
dissemination/
Catalogue
Stage 2
Two-waycommunication
Stage 3
Service &
financial
transactions
Stage 4
Vertical &horizontal
integration
Stage 5
Political
participation
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
12/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 12
A Synthesised Stages Approach
eGovernance/Commerce
eGovernance/Administration
eGovernance/Civic
Stage 1 Informational
Stage 2 Transactional
Stage 3 InternalIntegration
Stage 4 ExternalIntegration
Stage 5 eDemocracy
Stage 6 Maturity
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
13/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 13
Advantages of the Stages of
Growth Management Model
Intuitive simplicity
Predictability
Functional decomposition
Promotes Organisational Learning
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
14/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 14
Disadvantages of Stages of
Growth Model
Treats organisation as closed system
Higher stages require application ofbusiness process re-engineering
Needs to be supplemented with
performance management method Does not support culture change
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
15/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 15
Process
improvement
Process
reengineering
Business
reengineering
Transformation
Mindset
change
Scope
Gains
Risk
None
Paradigm
shift
Local and
limited
Threat to
survivalSustainable
step change
Incremental
Local Business-wide
Multidimensional Forces(Waddell, et al., 2004, p. 505)
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
16/25
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
17/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 17
Another View of OD
Organisation Development
Initiating
Change
Creating
a Vision
Develop
Political
Support
Managing
the
Transition
Sustaining
Momentum
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
18/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 18
Advantages of OD
Motivation derived from a Vision
Deals with resistance to change
Establishes political support Supports structural change
Treats organisation as open system
Is customer-process focused
Based on organisational learning Establishes change as part of the culture
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
19/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 19
Managing the Transition:
A Techno-structural intervention
Redesigns the core processes of theorganisation
Creates better coordination linkagesbetween organisational units
Uses ICTs as enablers Requires structural and cultural change Better workflow, quicker performance
and enhanced customer responsiveness
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
20/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 20
The 6 Stages as Steps
Step 1 Informational
Step 2 Transactional
Step 3 Process Redesign
Step 4 Full Integration
Step 5 e-Democracy
Step 6 Maturity
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
21/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 21
Enhancing the Model
PerformancePerformance
ManagementManagement:
Establish goals
Set metrics
Collect data
Assess performance Make adjustments
ProgrammeProgramme
ManagementManagement:
Obtain political
support
Invoke consistency
between projects Risk management
Quality management
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
22/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 22
Programme Management
Organisational Development
Motivating
Change
Creating
A Vision
Developing
Political
Support
Managing the
Transition
Sustaining
Momentum
Step 1 Informational
Step 2 Transactional
Step 3 Process Redesign
Step 4 Full Integration
Step 5 e-Democracy
Step 6 MaturityBalanced Scorecard
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
23/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 23
Another view
Managing the
Transition
(Six Steps)
Balanced Scorecard
Organisation Development
Programme Management
P
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
24/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 24
PlanningPlanning
OrganisingOrganising
LeadingLeading
ControllingControlling
Programme
Management
Balanced
Scorecard
Organisation
Development
8/6/2019 ManagingEgovernanceInitiativesA
25/25
2004, Lionel Pearce 25
Questions