Managing Risk Assessments - SCOHSG · x Risk Management will include the generation of specific Health & Safety risk assessments ; controls identified by the risk assessment process

Managing Risk Assessments:

Implementation, Communication and

Review

The DFDS Experience

Introduction

• Ma k s e uest – perspective on risk assessment from a large*

organisation

• Then saw the title:

• … Ma agi g ‘isk Assess e ts

Implementation, Communication & Review

• … hi h is huge …

• … a d all i a hou

• … all of hi h got e thi ki g a out e pe ie e of isk assess e t …

• … as I e had a fe diffe e t jo s i a fe diffe e t o pa ies

I the egi i g …

• Began as a graduate trainee in the steelworks in Rotherham

• Production foreman in a re-rolling Bar Mill

• Approx. 30 men on my shift

• No risk assessments

• Completed injury accident investigation reports

• … hi h I had to defe d i ou t* on several occasions

(personal injury cases)

• No safety qualifications

… a d the …

• Road haulage specialising in hazardous chemical transport – flammables, toxics, corrosives, oxidising agents

– bulk liquids in road-tankers

• There is only one way to do it; the safe way

• Management System (BS 5750/ISO 9002/1) Plan, Do, Check, Act HSG65 – feedback loop of continuous improvement

• Lots of procedures

• First exposure to risk assessment

• COSHH Regulations in 1988

• NEBOSH Certificate gained

• First fatality (driver ran out of diesel, crushed by cab)

The Docks Industry

• Hull Container Terminal

– Lo-Lo operation; ship-to-shore cranes

– rubber-tyred gantry cranes, tug units & trailers, top-lifts

– collecting/delivering HGVs

• Part of a Group of associated companies:

– Ships Agency, Freight Forwarding, Project Cargo

– (Bulk & General) Stevedoring, Warehousing & Transport

– Labour pool

– Berthing & Mooring

– Workshops

– Crewed workboats (Monobuoy in Humber estuary)

– A Train (Thomas the tank-engine shunting)

– Petroleum Coke silo cleaning operations

The Docks Industry

• 5 Operational sites on Humber Estuary: – Hull

– Howdendyke

– Keadby

– Grimsby

– Immingham*

• Other parts of the Group: – Mercedes-Benz franchise (16 HGV workshops)

– Pipe-coating factory

– Bonded warehouse in Felixstowe

– Dock activity in Southampton & Isle of Wight and Selby

• Lots of risk assessments

• NEBOSH Diploma Parts I & II gained

• Fatality – defe ded isk assess e t p o ess i Co o e s ou t*

Poacher to Gamekeeper

• Head of Safety for the ports of Grimsby and Immingham

• Immingham is the largest port in the country by tonnage

handled

• … and the largest port that no-one has ever heard of !

– 55 million tonnes per annum – inc. 20 mill. tonnes oil & 10 mill. tonnes

coal

– mainly bulk cargoes – bio-mass, animal feed, road-salt, grain, forest

products, steel

– also LoLo (containers) & RoRo (ferries, 30 sailings per week)

– plus general stevedoring & special/heavy lifts (eg. wind turbines; 52m

blades) & project cargoes

– … a d the e a e app o . COMAH sites i o i ediatel adja e t to the port [approx. 50:50 mix of Tier 1 & Tier 2]

Poacher to Gamekeeper

• Safety issues were minimal for the 300 port authority

employees

• … ost p o le s a ose f o the , people o ki g o the port each day – including several fatalities

• Suicide – RTC – drunken sailors – container crush – top-lift crush

– mooring ropes parting – falls into water

• Degree in Safety & Environmental management gained (Hull

Univ.)

Ferries & Logistics – from Lo-Lo to Ro-Ro

• Irish Sea business

– … he e I et Ma k

• Ro-Ro – roll-on, roll-off freight

• Ro-Pax – passenger vehicles

• Floating hotels

• i g ou holida - ake to o k da

• … si ila e pe ie e to he di g ats

• They can and do jump overboard

• Taken over by a larger organisation

• Ferry business was bigger; 9 vessels to 18

• … plus, a Logisti s Di isio ith e ual s ale of ope atio ! • Mooring rope fatality [12 tonne winch, 70 tonne rope]

Merger with DFDS - 2010

• DFDS Det Forenade Dampskibs-Selskab

• We e Da ish – HQ in Copenhagen

• The U ited Stea ship Co pa

• Founded by C.F. Tietgen in 1866

• Merger of the 3 largest steamship companies in Denmark

• Baltic – north North Sea – mid North Sea – Channel

DFDS – who are we ?

Quick Overview

• 60 vessels – 500 weekly shipping departures

• 2 million vehicle movements – trailers, containers, self-drives

• … suppo ted a et o k of te i als, hu s & logisti s operations

• DFDS Group has approx. 6,000 personnel +contractors

• … i ou t ies

• app o . 5 :5 split et & d pe so el • , u its – trailers, containers, mafis, cassettes, swap-bodies

• 140,000 m2 of warehousing

• Rail services

• Steel, paper, cars & other vehicles, passengers, foodstuffs

(frozen/ambient), project cargoes

• DKK illio a ual e e ue ≈ £ , , ,

Perspective from a large organisation

• HMRC website:

• EU legislation defines a SME, rather than a large business

• Inversion yields a definition for a large business

• EITHER >250 employees

• OR >€50M turnover AND €43M assets

• Also include UK businesses owned by multi-nationals

having >100 employees in the UK and which otherwise

satisfy the criteria for number of employees, turnover

and assets, globally

• Thus, DFDS meets the definition of a large organisation

DFDS Structure

• Wet a ti it

• The Fleet – 60 vessels (mainly owned, some on charter)

• D A ti it

• 2 Divisions – Sea a s a d Logisti s

• Sea a s – Dockside Terminals; interface with the vessels

• Logisti s – network of logistics operations

• But, Seaways Division also does logistics

• … a d Logisti s Di isio also does essel ha te i g

• Grown organically over the years

• My remit is safet fo e e thi g that is ot et

DFDS Group Safety Framework Document

Section 6 – Arrangements

DFDS Group Safety Management System

General Requirements

6.1 Resources

6.2 Customer Focus

6.3 Training/Competency

6.4 Risk Management

• 6.4.1 Strategic Risk – Response Mapping

• 6.4.2 Control of Change

• 6.4.3 Contractor Control

• 6.4.4 Legislative Compliance

6.4 Risk Management

All DFDS Group operational entities will adopt a systematic

approach to risk management by identifying and

understanding all pertinent business risks associated with

their activities and by planning and performing operations to

reduce and control those risks

Risk Management will include the generation of specific

Health & Safety risk assessments; controls identified by the

risk assessment process will become operating standards via

incorporation into safe systems of work

Health & Safety risks will be controlled via operation of the

DFDS Group Safety Management System

Risk management by operational entities will include business

continuity planning; there is therefore a requirement for

appropriate emergency planning per operational entity

All DFDS Group operational entities will develop and

communicate appropriate emergency planning arrangements

as part of the overall risk management of operational activity

Risk management by operational entities will include

appropriate health surveillance and provision of medicals

matched to health risks identified by the risk assessment

process

British Approach to Risk Assessment

• You will all be familiar with RA in the UK

• Management Regs. 1992 (originally)

• European Directive 89/391/EEC*




• European Directive 89/391/EEC

• Regulation 3 E e e plo e shall ake a suita le a d suffi ie t assess e t of the isks ….





• Regulation 3 E e e plo e shall ake a suitable and

suffi ie t assess e t of the isks ….

• ACOP … a s ste ati ge e al e a i atio …







• The pu pose of the isk assess e t …















• A suita le a d suffi ie t isk assess e t should e ade









• The isk assess e t should ide tif isks a isi g f o o i o e tio ith o k









• The risk assessment should identify risks arising from or in

o e tio ith o k

Activity/Process ************ Ref. No. ABC123

Assessor(s) : *.***** & *.********

Types of Persons at Risk :

*****

Staff / Drivers / Visitors

Numbers of Persons at Risk : **

HAZARDS CONSEQUENCE CONTROLS L S R

L = Likelihood -

score 1-5

1, Unlikely

2, Possible

3, Probable

4, Likely

5, Certain

S = Severity - score 1-5

1, Slight Injury

2, Minor

3, Serious

4, Major

5, Fatal

R = Overall Risk Rating

Overall Score Risk

<8

Tolerable

8-14

Moderate

>14

Intolerable

Any further action required?

Assessor(s) Name(s) *.****** & *.*******

& Signature(s) :

Li e Ma age s Na e *.**********

& Signature :

Assessment Date : ***** Review Date: *****

Activity/Process : Refuelling HGV Tractor Units in the Yard

Ref. No. ImmRA2

Assessor(s) : *.***** & *.********

Types of Persons at Risk : F/L

Operators

Staff / Drivers / Visitors

Numbers of Persons at Risk : 27

HAZARDS CONSEQUENCE CONTROLS L S R

Diesel Fuel Splash into eye

Dermatitis

Spillages

Fire

Authorised/Trained HGV drivers

PPE – gloves, eye protection

Bunded storage tank

Interceptor fitted to drains

Bunker delivery by ADR trained

supply drivers

Emergency cut off and fire

extinguishers

St i t No S oki g ‘ule

Eye wash at the refuelling point

1

1

1

1

2

3

2

4

2

3

2

4

L = Likelihood -

score 1-5

1, Unlikely

2, Possible

3, Probable

4, Likely

5, Certain

S = Severity - score 1-5

1, Slight Injury

2, Minor

3, Serious

4, Major

5, Fatal

R = Overall Risk Rating

Overall Score Risk

<8

Tolerable

8-14

Moderate

>14

Intolerable

Any further action required?

Assessor(s) Name(s) *.****** & *.*******

& Signature(s) :

Li e Ma age s Na e *.**********

& Signature :

Assess e t Date : Sept 9 ‘e ie Date: Sept

ASSESSMENT DATE

08/07/2013

DEPARTMENT

DFDS LOGISITCS

SAFE WORKING PROCEDURE Ref.

SWP-002

ACTIVITY / SITUATION:

VEHICLE RE-FUELLING

COSHH ASSESSMENT Ref.

MANUAL HANDLING ASSESSMENT Ref.

OTHER ASSESSMENT Refs. (NOISE,VDU ETC)

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR JOB

SWP TRAINING

INFORMATION & INSTRUCTIONS

SWP -002

ENGINEERING CONTROLS: (Isolation, Immobilisation, Permits to Work (Access) Etc.)

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND CLOTHING FOR JOB

SAFETY FOOTWEAR, HI-VISUAL CLOTHING, EYE PROTECTION, GLOVES.

EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES

OUTSTANDING ACTIONS & COMPLETION DATES

HAZARD

NO.

ACTION

REQUIRED

TARGET

DATE

ACTION

BY

COMPLETION

DATE

23 (SEE BELOW)

(SEE BELOW)

ONGIONG

HEATH AND

SAFETY

DEPARTMENT/

DEPARTMENT

HEADS

COMMENTS (Continue on page 4 if required)

HOUSKEEPING SHOULD BE MONITORED TO ENSURE AREA IS KEPT CLEAR OF ANY COMBUSTABLE MATRIAL DISGARDED FROM PREVIOUS

USE.

ALL SPILLAGES MUST BE DEALT WITH IMMEDIATLY TO ENSURE THAT ALL SURFACES ARE FREE FROM SLIP HAZARDS.

OVERALL RISK RATING, ONCE CONTROLS & OUTSTANDING

ACTIONS IMPLEMENTED (Please tick)

VERY HIGH HIGH MEDIUM LOW VERY LOW

ASSESMENT CARRIED OUT BY:

******* **********

SIGNED:

POSITION:-

HEALTH AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT

DATE:-

08/07/2013

RENEWAL DATE:-

08/07/2014

Hazard

Persons at Risk

Emp. Visitor Young Person

Cont. Exp. Mum

Likelyhood / Potentail for Exposure

Freq. O al Poss. Remote

Improb.

Potential Severity

Fatal Major Serious

Minor

Hazard

Rating

Number

Risk

Level

Action

‘e d

15 12 9 7 5 15 10 6 2 Yes/No

1 Fall of Object From Height

2 Fall of Person From Height

3 Fall on Same Level 42 L NO

4 Manual Handling Individual 42 L NO

5 Manual Handling Team

6 Slinging

7 Trapping

8 Cranes

9 Forklifts

10 Hand Operated Machinery 10 VL NO

11 Power Operated Machinery

12 Electricity / High voltage

13 Noise 10 VL NO

14 Electric Tools

15 Hydraulic tools

16 Hand Tools

17 Pneumatic Tools

18 Adverse Weather 42 L NO

19 Fire 105 M NO

20 Radiant heat

21 Flying Particles 42 L NO

22 Wind Blown Particles 10 VL NO

23 Housekeeping 42 L YES

24 Lighting

25 Lone Working

26 Deep Water

27 Pressure systems

28 Stored Energy

29 Fume 105 M NO

30 Asbestos

31 Awkward Access

32 Compressed Air

33 Confined Spaces

34 Excavations

35 Collision (RTC) 105 M NO

36 Collision (Pedestrian) 105 M NO



• He e s a a iatio o a the e; No the I ela d Health & Safet at Work (Northern Ireland) Order 1978

• The Management of H&S @W Regulations (N.I.) 2000 & 2006

• Regulation 3 E e e plo e shall ake a suitable and

suffi ie t assess e t ….

Name of site ****** Location within site Assessment date Assessment no. NI Transit 2 & 3 and the yard area **/**/201* RA 006-03

Task or process Name of assessor(s) Name (s) of staff

consulted

Manual Handling ******** *********

Hazards identified

Groups exposed

(with

numbers and

patterns)

Evidence of

previous

hazardous events Existing controls H* L* R*

1.Back strains

Grazing

Cuts & Bruises

Slips & trips

Bodily injuries

The risk of sustaining

bodily injury

participating in any

manual handling activity.

Injuries sustained could

be from minor to severe

trauma In back, neck

muscular strains

2. Crushing if item being

carried falls on the

olleague s odil pa ts.

3. Stabbing / injection

from protruding nails on

pallets or bars from

cages

70 + warehouse

colleagues and

agency staff.

Working on shift

patterns 24hrs a

day 7 days a

week.

IP stood on nail

sticking out from

a broken pallet

25/05/13

resulting in a 3

day RIDDOR

Manual handling training is

instructed and given to all

warehouse colleagues.

Safe working practise instruction.

Mechanical means are available

for the movement of heavy or

awkward loads where necessary.

Hazard reporting procedure

PPE (Gloves, Safety footwear, High

Viz Vest)

2

2

2

2

1

2

4

2

4

Additional controls needed Action date Date

completed Residual

risk Review date

Short-Term

Monitoring of SWOP compliance

Retraining policy after any related accident

Immediate investigation on any hazard reported. Immediate

& Ongoing

09/03/201*

Medium-Term

Continue to monitor and review

09/03/201*

Long-Term

This risk assessment will be reviewed within the

timescale detailed, after a related accident or change in

working practises

09/03/201*

I have read and understood the hazards and control measures of the risk assessment. Print __________________________________________ Signed _________________________________________ Date __________________ General Manager acceptance _______________________ Date ___________________

Swedish Approach to Risk Assessment

• Co ept of the Wo k E i o e t

– directive (89/391/EEC)

• Main legislation decided by the Swedish parliament

• Main ordinance ie. authority to form regulations

• The Swedish Wo k Environment Autho it eates ‘egulatio s

– ie. regulations covering specific work activity

– eg. there is a specific set of Dock Regulations

• Over 100 specific sets of Regulations

• … a of which contain a specific requirement to risk assess

– the use of vehicles

– the use of safety equipment

– pregnant workers

– work in high places

Co ept of the Wo k E i o e t

Additional controls needed Action date Date completed Residual risk Review date

Short-Term

Monitoring of SWOP compliance

Retraining policy after any related incident

Immediate investigation on any hazard reported.

Report any drivers not following procedures for Dock Locks to their Transport Manager

and potentially ban said driver from site.

Immediate & On-

going

09/10//2015

Medium-Term

Continue to monitor and review.

09/10//2015

Long-Term

This risk assessment will be reviewed within the timescale detailed, after a related

accident or change in working practices 09/10//2015

I have read and understood the hazards and control measures of the risk assessment. Print __________________________________________ Signed _________________________________________ Date ___________________ General Manager acceptance _______________________ Date ____________________

Provisions1

1 Cf.

Swedish Risk Assessment

• Definition of systematic work environment

management

• Section 2

• For the purposes of these Provisions, systematic work

environment management means the work done by the

employer to investigate, carry out and follow up activities

in such a way that ill-health and accidents at work are

prevented and a satisfactory working environment

achieved.


• Section 73 73

• The employer shall make sure that the e plo ees knowledge of the work and of the risks which the work

entails is sufficient for ill-health and accidents to be

prevented and for a satisfactory working environment to

be achieved.

• Where the risks at work are serious there shall be written

instructions for the work.


• Risk assessment, measures and follow-up

• Section 8

• The employer shall regularly investigate working

conditions and assess the risks of any person being

affected by ill-health or accidents at work.

• The risk assessment shall be documented in writing.

• The risk assessment shall indicate which risks are present

and whether or not they are serious.

DFDS Seaways Division Gothenburg Terminal

• Quote :

• We have an established routine (established with safety

representatives) about when and how we should carry out a risk

assessment on the regular work and changes.

DFDS Seaways Division Gothenburg Terminal

• Quote :

• We have an established routine (established with safety

representatives) about when and how we should carry out a risk

assessment on the regular work and changes.

• We have also a standard form.

• Last year we did about 25 different risk assessments, together

with the safety representatives, for example, layout changes,

new type of cargos, new machines etc.

• We also do separate safety inspections twice a year on every

ship, four times p.a. on the yard area (includes environmental

issues) and once p.a. i the offi es.

Dutch Approach to Risk Assessment

• Quote :

• The e s a e ui e e t to meet the EC directive with regard to

‘isk ‘espo si ilit .

• The EC directive, guidelines and standards are integrated in

Dutch Labour Law

– Occupational Health & Safety Regulations

• Plus, there are local regulations for OSH (set up by local

autho ities


• Quote o t d : • We have the risk assessment done as required by the Dutch

Labour Law (regarding safety for Labour, visitors, contractors)


• Quote o t d : • We have the risk assessment* done as required by the Dutch

Labour Law (regarding safety for Labour, visitors, contractors)

• … e are busy with the Fire Safety & Property Protection

assessment (Buildings and equipment)

• … a d a Business Continuity Plan (risk that affects the daily

business, and may harm the continuity of the daily business ).

• We also have to comply to the safety rules set up by the

insurance company.

• (* All this esults i ‘isk Inventorisation

Risico Analyse - Risk Assessment

Outside

Grounds

& Roads

Office

also

TSW Office

4. Hoofdpoort – main gate

5. Poort 5 (loge en poort) – gatehouse

8. Opslag Gasflessen – storage cylinders

10. Linkspans (+ kantoor botenbaas) – Linkspan oss s offi e

Extract from a 42 page spreadsheet !!

Verzakkingen – subsidence

Gevaar – Danger (Hazard)

Brand – fire

Lekkage (ondergrondse) leidingen – leakage (underground) pipes

Water en Stormschade – water (flood), storm damage

Spill – spill

Instorting – collapse

Brand – fire

Risicofactoren – Risk Factors

Beheersmaatregelen – Management (controls)

Mogelijke Schade – Possible Damage(s) (consequences)

Risicogrootte – Risk Size

Risicoomschrijving – Risk Description

Aanvaardbaar Risico – Acceptable Risk

Vereiste Maatregel – Required Action

Geen Actie – No Action

Creatief denken en dogen ! – Creative thinking and doing !

Veiligheidsrapportage – Safety Reporting

Wasstraat – Car Wash

APK Ruimte – Outer Space outside a d, ot the Cos os Werkplaats Bovenbouw – Workshop Superstructure

Handelingen door technisch onderhoud (hoofblad) –

Actions by technical maintenance (main page)

Locatie/Deelmachine – Location/Machine Part

Handeling – Action (Activity)

Algemeen onderhoud – General Maintenance

Freq. – Frequency

Maand – Month(ly) othe e t ies a e Jaar /Yea ly) ie. Annually)

Gebruikt Arbeidsmiddel – Use Work Equipment

Wasautomaat – Washing Machine

Remstation – Brake (test) Station (Rolling Road)

Optredende Gevaren – (Occuring) Hazards

Gevaar Voor Verwonding – Risk of Injury

Optredende Gevaren – (Occuring) Hazards

Gevaar Voor Elektrocutie – Risk of Electrocution

Oorzaak – Cause

Verkeerde Bediening – Incorrect Operation

Oorzaak – Cause

Installatie Onder Spanning – Incorrect Under-Voltage

“o hat do the do i F a e ?

Activity/Process : Vessel Operations – Port of Dover Ref. No. Du-A001

Assessor(s) :

************

Types of Persons at Risk :

Freight Co-Ordinators, Supervisors, Passenger

Services Dept. Personnel, Members of Public,

Ship s C e

Numbers of Persons at Risk :

60

HAZARDS CONSEQUENCE CONTROLS L x S = R

Moving vehicle contact Vehicle contact with pedestrian - general

Wheels running over feet - specifically

Vehicle contact with other vehicle

Vehicle contact with fixed infrastructure

Vehicle entering water

Vehicle overturning

Vehicle losing load (whole/part)

Authorised drivers 1 5 5

Vehicle movements per port layout 1 4 4

Low speed limit port limit (30KMPH) 1 3 3

Roadworthiness monitored 1 3 3

Roadways marked & signed 1 5 5

Walkways marked & signed 1 5 5

Driver awareness of pedestrian likelihood 1 4 4

DFDS Seaways DOVER Risk Assessment

DFDS Ferry Division DUNKERQUE - Evaluation des Risques

Activité/Procédure : Opérations Navires – Quai de ‘a sgate / Quai d Alsa e

Réf. No. Du-A001

Conseiller(s) :

*********

Types de personnes liées aux Risques :

Coordinateurs Fret, Superviseurs, Passagers, Services du

Personnel, Membres du Public, Equipages navires

Nombre de personnes liées aux risques :

60

DANGER CONSEQUENCE CONTROLES L x S = R

Contact véhicule en mouvement Contact véhicule avec piétons - général

Roues circulant sur les pieds - spécifiquement

Contact véhicule avec un autre véhicule

Contact avec une infrastructure fixe

V hi ule to a t da s l eau *p opos

Renversement véhicule

Véhicule perdant tout ou partie de son

Chauffeurs autorisés 1 5 5

Déplacements véhicules selon disposition du port 1 4 4

Vitesse limitée (30KM/H) 1 3 3

Contrôle véhicules en marche 1 3 3

Chaussées balisées et signalées 1 5 5

Allées piétonnières balisées et signalées 1 5 5

Sensibilisation des chauffeurs aux risques piétons 1 4 4

chargement

Sensibilisation des piétons aux

déplacements véhicules

Vêtements piétons hautement visible dans

la mesure du possible

Eclairage artificiel augmenté si demandé

Phares véhicules de mauvaise visibilité

Balises clignotantes sur le terminal véhicules

Visiteurs (piétons et occupants voitures) non

fa ilia is s a e le site, te us à l a t des zones de travail ou accompagnés par des

guides et dirigés/suivis par le personnel

Surfaces terminal contrôlées et entretenues

– zones balisées fortement endommagées

DANGER CONSEQUENCE CONTROLES L x S = R

Surfaces terminal contrôlées et entretenues

– zones balisées fortement endommagées

Sablage du sol lors de gel

Personnel du Terminal guide les véhicules

comme demandé

Utilisation par le personnel de sifflets pour

diriger les véhicules

Port par le personnel de chaussures à bout

renforcé

pe so el se tie t à l a t des hi ules.

DANGER CONSEQUENCE CONTROLES L x S =

R

Fourniture de blocs de béton pour guider la circulation

Fla ues/ta hes d huile – danger de

glissade

Chutes des piétons Signalement du personnel des épanchements pour élimination

rapide

1 4 4

Poi t d a a age le – risque de faux

pas

Chutes des piétons Précaution du personnel 1 4 4

Poi ts d a a age pei ts de ouleu s lata tes

Co ta t a pe d a s Blessures aux

mains/doigts

P autio du pe so el pou s assu e u est ie e ouill e une fois levée

1 4 4

Manuel spécifique – formation manutention

Manuel spécifique – évaluation manutention

P ise des a tes d e a ue e t Contact véhicule avec

piétons - général

Roues circulant sur les

pieds-spécifiquement

Co sig es au Pe so el d ite d alle e t e les files de oitu e, les a tes d e a ue e t e so t d li es u au poi ts de chargement. (voir aussi EXIGENCES MCA)

1 5 5

Des précautions spéciales doivent être prises la nuit.

D s la a te d e a ue e t p ise, le pe so el se tie t ie à l a t du hi ule

Poussière, cailloux, et débris au sol Chutes des piétons Précaution du personnel

colère et injures des MOP Agression physique Personnel formé pour gérer les situations 1 2 2

Clip- cravate porté par les membres du personnel

L = probabilité - score 1-5

1, Improbable

2, Possible

3, Probable

4, très probable

5, Certain

S = Gravité - score 1-5

1, blessure légère

2, mineure

3, grave

4, très grave

5, mortelle

R = Indice total risques

Score total Risque

<8 Tolérable

8-14 Modéré

>14 Intolérable

Autre action demandée ?

AUCUNE

Nom(s) du(des) Conseiller(s) ***********

Et Signature(s) :

Nom du Directeur de la Ligne : *********

et Signature :

Date Evaluation:

******

Date Révision: ******

Conclusions

• I e ade a isk assess e ts fo a a ge of a ti ities

• I e see a isk assess e ts ade othe s

• I e see a s ste s fo isk assess e t usi g a a ge of scoring

– 1 to 3 – alte ati e of Lo , Mediu a d High isk ranking)

– 1 to 4

– 1 to 5

– 1 to 6

– … e e to

• Usually just Likelihood & Severity to yield Risk Rating

• … ut ha e see F e ue used as a al ulatio fa to

• Usually without weighting, but some systems use weighting

• Also seen assessments (i) without considering existing controls and

then (ii) with existing controls - unnecessary

Personal Opinion

• The est s ste is …. • … the o e that o ks fo YOU !

• Advice :

• … keep it si ple

Managing Risk Assessments


• Implementation :

• Each BU has their own version which works for them



• Implementation

• Each BU has their own version which works for them – Tick

• … e ause all o pl ith ge e al e ui e e t to use ‘A to manage safety

• Review

• Each BU manages their own safety management system

• … hi h i ludes e ie of isk assessments



• Implementation

• Each BU has their own version which works for them – Tick

• … e ause all o pl ith ge e al e ui e e t to use ‘A to manage safety

• Review

• Each BU manages their own safety management system

• … hi h i ludes e ie of isk assessments – Tick

• Internal audit system operated by the Group Safety Dept. (me !)



• Communication – via SSOWs (essential elements of the RA process)

• This is the whole point of the risk assessment process

• The risk assessment process identifies required controls

• Controls form Safe Systems of Work

– Do do , do t do , al a s do , e e do , ou a do that ut o l if …

• SSOWs fo Ope ati g Sta da ds

• Promulgation of best practice

• Able to be inspected/audited to check compliance

Summary

• DFDS is a very diverse organisation with a wide range of

operational activity, equipment and business unit size

• … so the e is o o e size fits all risk assessment

• … espe iall ith the eed to o pl ith a i g atio al legislation

• BUT, the principles of risk assessment are readily applicable

• … a d the p o ess a e eas if kept si ple

Any Questions ?

Managing Risk Assessments - SCOHSG · x Risk Management will include the generation of specific Health & Safety risk assessments ; controls identified by the risk assessment process

Documents